Abstract
Fullerene C60 nanoparticles are being used in broad range of applications. It is important to assess their potential impacts in the environment. We evaluated the effects of C60 introduced as aqueous suspensions of nC60 aggregates of different particle size or via organic solvents on soils with different organic matter contents in this study. Impacts of the application were evaluated by measuring total microbial biomass, metabolic activity and bacterial community structure. Results show that nC60 aggregates, introduced as an aqueous suspension, had size-dependent effects on soil bacterial community composition in the low organic matter system, but induced minimal change in the microbial biomass and metabolic activity in soils with both high and low organic matter contents. Fullerene C60, co-introduced via an organic solvent, did not influence the response of soil microbes to the organic solvents. Our results suggest that nC60 aggregates of smaller size may have negative impact on soil biota and soil organic matter may play a key role in modulating the environmental effect of nanomaterials.
Carbon nanoparticles, such as C60, have received a great deal of attention for their unique properties and potential commercial applications1. Although hydrophobic in nature, C60 will form stable colloidal suspensions in water2. This is important because C60 may control the availability of pollutants to biological systems3,4. The C60 aggregates in aqueous suspensions (nC60) have a crystal structure and can be stable for months, or longer, in low ionic strength solutions5, suggesting that nC60 aggregates could persist in the environment. This further raises concerns on their potential adverse effects.
Studies in our group have demonstrated fullerene C60 when exposed to the environmental matrices such as soil or activated sludge, showed limited effects on microbial activities and community structures6,7. However, other studies have reported that nC60 in water suspensions have strong antibacterial activities8 and affect the growth and development of benthic organisms9. This inconsistency could be caused by influential factors such as particle size, morphology, surface charge, and environmental conditions10,11. nC60 aggregates of smaller sizes have shown greater antibacterial activity on cultured bacterial cells8,12. It is still unknown if the size of nC60 aggregates is a major factor controlling the response of microorganisms in complex environmental matrices.
Pristine C60 is relatively insoluble in water13. Organic solvents are used during the manufacturing, processing, application, and handling of C60 and C60-containing products. Co-exposure with organic solvents has been shown to interfere with xenobiotic metabolic activity in zebrafish larvae14, while the biodegradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in soils has been observed to increase15,16. C60 nanoparticles are highly hydrophobic (log kow of 6.67)13, suggesting they will tend to absorb to soil. Organic solvents could possibly alter the potential effects of C60 in soil by facilitating interactions between C60 and soil microorganisms. However, the impact of C60 co-introduced in organic solvents on soil microbial processes is largely unknown.
The objective of this study was to examine the response of the soil bacterial community to the introduction of nC60 across a range of aggregate sizes, and C60 co-introduced in an organic solvent. Different sized nC60 aggregates were made by adjusting the mixing rate and ratio of water to a C60-saturated tetrahydrofuran (THF) solution. Toluene and THF were selected because: 1) Toluene is a solvent commonly used in many industrial applications, and it also finds use as a solvent to manipulate C60 as it can dissolve C60 at 2800 mg/L17; 2) THF is a water-miscible organic solvent with low boiling point (66 °C) that has been widely used to make water stable dispersions of C60 nanoparticles8,18. The effects of C60 on the response of soil microorganisms to toluene and THF were evaluated on soils with different organic matter contents. Results from this study may provide useful information to understand microbial response to C60 in environmental matrices.
Results and Discussion
nC60 aggregate size
In previous reports, differential centrifugation was used to separate nC60 aggregates into fractions with different size distributions19. Different sizes of nC60 aggregates can also be produced by changing the rate of water addition to C60-saturated THF during the mixing process8, where the particle size decreases as the rate of water addition is increased. In this study, nC60 aggregates at an average diameter of 77.8 ± 9.5 nm were generated when 250 mL of water was mixed with 250 mL of C60-saturated THF in 2 seconds with fast and vigorous agitation (Supplementary Fig. S1). Aggregates with smaller size were achieved by increasing the volume ratio of water to C60-saturated THF, and relatively narrow polydispersity was observed (Supplementary Table S1). Our data show that as the average particle size decreases, more particles with size approaching the mean value were obtained.
Mineralization activity and microbial biomass
Substrate-induced respiration (SIR) was usually used to estimate soil microbial activity. A readily decomposable substrate was added to soil samples, and the resulting maximal initial respiration response measured over a short time period is used to evaluate the microbial activity in response to toxic materials20. In this study, glucose induced respiration in 3 h was used to estimate the mineralization activity of the standing biomass affected by nanomaterial. With repeated application of different sized nC60, the levels of 14CO2 evolved in 3 h after 14C-labled glucose addition showed some weekly fluctuations and were higher in the Drummer soil than in the Tracy soil (Fig. 1a), indicating more microbial activity in the Drummer soil, which is typical for soils with higher organic matter21. It had been expected that nC60 aggregates of smaller particle sizes would have the greatest potential to cause adverse effects on soil microbial activities. However, no significant differences (P > 0.05) were observed between the treatments and the control at any time point for either soil, even when the applied nC60 had accumulated to 7 μg/g soil at week 7.
Figure 1. Microbial activity estimated by 14CO2 released (% of 14C applied) 3 hours following 14C-labled glucose amendment.
(a) Soils treated with C60 aggregates in aqueous suspensions (nC60) of different size, tetrahydrofuran residue (THF-R) and water (control) weekly. (b) Soils treated with solvents saturated with or without C60 at different doses (denoted as CL, CM and CH) after a 2-week incubation. Data are mean values ± SD, n = 3, *P < 0.05 compared to the control.
Using the same SIR principle, soil response to C60 co-introduced with toluene or THF was determined. No significant difference (P > 0.05) in 14CO2 production was observed between samples treated with low doses of toluene, with and without C60, and the control for either soil (Fig. 1b). Although THF at low dose did not affect 14CO2 production in the Drummer soil, they did significantly enhance 14CO2 production in the Tracy soil. Biodegradation of THF has been reported in several studies22,23,24. Therefore, we suggest that the low dose of THF might stimulate the microbial activity in the Tracy soil. However, it should be noted that the presence of C60 did not affect the mineralization activity of soil microbes. For both soils, decreased 14CO2 production was observed when the solvents were applied at medium and high doses, and toluene shows a stronger inhibitory effect than THF (Fig. 1b) in either soil. Similarly, the presence of C60 did not affect 14CO2 production compared to the non-C60 treatment in all cases.
Soil microbial biomass is a measure of the physiologically active part of the soil microbiota that is responsible for critical soil functions. Phospholipids make up cell membrane of living cells; moreover they are an important marker as they change in response to stress and once released to soil, break down rapidly25. Therefore, total phospholipid-derived phosphate (PL-PO4) is commonly used to estimate soil microbial biomass26,27. After 7 week incubation for particle size effects, the total microbial biomass estimated PL-PO4 concentrations range from 11 to 13 nmol/g for Drummer soil, and 6 to 7 nmol/g for Tracy soil (Fig. 2a). The results of the PL-PO4 analysis showed higher microbial biomass in Drummer soil, which has a higher organic matter content, and supports the widely held conclusion that microbial biomass is correlated with soil organic matter contents28. However, no significant changes was found (P > 0.05) in the size of the microbial biomass as compared to the control soils in either soil. Previous studies have also shown soil respiration and microbial biomass were unaffected by aqueous C60 aggregates29.
Figure 2. Microbial biomass indicated as total phospholipid-PO4.
(a) Soils treated with tetrahydrofuran residue (THF-R), C60 aggregates in aqueous suspensions (nC60) of different size compared with the control after a 7-week incubation. (b) Soils treated with solvents saturated with or without C60 at different doses (denoted as CL, CM and CH) after a 2-week incubation. Data are mean values ± SD, n = 3, *P < 0.05 compared to the control.
Total microbial biomass was significantly lower (P < 0.05) in the Drummer soil treated with a high dose of toluene, and in the Tracy soil with a high dose of either toluene or THF (Fig. 2b). In the two cases, the presence of C60 had no effect on the response. At a low dose, THF did not change the level of biomass in the Drummer soil, but increased the size of the biomass in the Tracy soil, where increased microbial activity as estimated by SIR was also evidenced (Fig. 1b). THF has been shown to be biodegradable22,23,24 and our work suggests that THF at low level may be utilized by the soil biomass and the co-introduced C60 would not alter this response. Hartmann et al.30 have also reported that mineralization of sodium acetate by activated sludge were not affected by the presence of nC60.
Bacterial community analysis
DGGE patterns of bacterial communities in the treated samples are shown in Figs 3 and 4. For both Drummer and Tracy soils, the DGGE profiles revealed complex banding patterns, indicating a highly diverse bacterial community structure typically found in soils31. A number of DGGE bands were unique to each soil suggesting that the soils do support different bacterial populations.
Figure 3. Microbial community analysis of the Drummer and Tracy soil samples treated with C60 aggregates in aqueous suspensions (nC60) of different size, tetrahydrofuran residue (THF-R), and water (control).
(a,b) DGGE profiles of 16S rRNA gene fragments. (c,d) Dendrograms based on UPGMA cluster analysis showing similarity of the DGGE profiles. Lane M: DGGE marker. Arrows indicate the bands which were extracted from the gels for sequence analysis.
Figure 4. Microbial community analysis for the Drummer soil treated with solvents saturated with or without C60 at different doses (denoted as CL, CM and CH).
(a) DGGE profiles of 16S rRNA gene fragments. (b) Dendrograms based on UPGMA cluster analysis showing similarity of the DGGE profiles. Lane M: DGGE marker. Arrows indicate the bands which were extracted from the gels for sequence analysis.
Following the application of nC60 aggregates of different sizes to either soil, the DGGE fingerprints yielded around 20 visible bands (Supplementary Fig. S2). The banding patterns of the Drummer soil showed a high degree of similarity, which was also indicated by the dendrogram (Fig. 3a,c). In contrast, a major band (B2) was missing and the intensities of bands B1, B3 and B4 were much lower in the Tracy soil treated with nC60 aggregates at 51 and 78 nm (Fig. 3b). Differences in the community structure were also indicated by the dendrogram of DGGE fingerprint. As shown in Fig. 3d, the DGGE profiles were classified into two groups, one with samples treated with the two smaller sized nC60 aggregates, and the other group which was further grouped into two clusters with water control and THF residue (THF-R) control samples grouped together. These results demonstrate that nC60 aggregates have size-dependent effects on bacterial community structure in soils with low organic matter content. Size-dependent toxicity of nC60 aggregates and nanoparticles have been previously reported10,19,32. Sorption of nanomaterials to natural organic matter can strongly reduce their bioavailability and antibacterial activity33,34.
When the Drummer soil was treated with low doses of toluene either with or without C60, few effects on the community profiles were noticed except the intensity of band B9 was enhanced (Fig. 4a). Medium and high doses of toluene produced unique patterns with several strong bands (B5 to B9) regardless of the presence of C60. These intensified bands may be the result of a selective enrichment of populations that are tolerant species or capable of toluene degradation. However, THF application had little effect on bacterial community structure except the intensity of band B10 was enhanced (Fig. 4a). These results were also indicated by the cluster analysis (Fig. 4b). The control sample was clustered together with the low dose toluene treatments, and the co-introduced C60 soil was grouped together with its respective toluene treatment. In contrast soils receiving low doses of C60-saturated THF forms an out-group while others were clustered together with similarity higher than 90%, which could be due to the enhanced band B10.
For the Tracy soil, the medium dose of C60-saturated toluene enriched bands B1 and B7 as compared with the control, while the intensity of band B3 was increased with low dose toluene additions (Fig. 5a). These results indicate that bands B1, B3 and B7 may be related to bacteria capable of toluene utilization. The respective dendrogram shows that the DGGE profiles are clustered into two groups, suggesting high doses of toluene can influence the bacterial community (Fig. 5b). Likewise, the samples with medium or high doses of THF were separated from the control and low doses of THF. These results are consistent with DGGE profiles that the intensity of bands B3, B4 and B11 in the Tracy soil were inhibited with THF addition at the two higher doses either with or without C60 (Fig. 5a). These findings suggest that co-exposed C60 exerts little effect on soil bacterial community structure.
Figure 5. Microbial community analysis for the Tracy soil treated with solvents saturated with or without C60 at different doses (denoted as CL, CM and CH).
(a) DGGE profiles of 16S rRNA gene fragments. (b) Dendrograms based on UPGMA cluster analysis showing similarity of the DGGE profiles. Lane M: DGGE marker. Arrows indicate the bands which were extracted from the gels for sequence analysis.
To better understand the changes of bacterial community composition induced by C60, the DGGE bands which showed enhanced or reduced intensity were excised and subjected to direct sequence analysis. The closest 16S rRNA gene sequences showing similarities are listed in Table 1. Bands B1, B2, B3 and B4, which are absent or whose intensity increased in samples treated with nC60 aggregates of two smaller particle sizes in the Tracy soil, are closely related to uncultured gamma proteobacteria clones (96–100% sequence similarity), indicating they are responsive to nC60 aggregate application. Bands B5, B6, B7 and B8 which occurred in Drummer soil treated with medium and high doses of toluene showed greatest similarity to Bacillus sp. (97–100%). Bands B9 and B10 show high similarity to Rhodococcus sp. (98%) and Pseudonocardia sp. (99%), respectively. Isolates of the three groups of bacteria have been previously reported to be capable of toluene degradation35,36, suggesting the systems may have responded with increases in populations capable of toluene degradation. A similar result has been shown in which bands appeared in DGGE analysis of bacterial communities after acute gamma-irradiation and suggesting surviving bacteria may have thrived and increased their representative populations37. Four bands were extracted and sequenced from Tracy soil following solvent applications. Bands B3, B4 and B11 showed high similarity to uncultured gram-negative bacteria, while band B12 showed 100% similarity to Bacillus benzoevorans38, which is capable of degradation of various aromatic acids and phenols.
Table 1. Sequence similarities of recovered DGGE Bands.
Bands (GenBank accession number) | Most closely related database entry (GenBank accession number) | Similarity |
---|---|---|
B1 (KP217807) | Uncultured Coxiellaceae bacterium clone (JX576004) | 96% |
B2 (KP204446) | Uncultured gamma proteobacterium clone (LN567544) | 98% |
B3 (GQ470409) | Uncultured Rhodanobacter sp. clone (DQ145582) | 100% |
B4 (GQ470410) | Uncultured gamma proteobacterium clone (EF072022) | 97% |
B5 (GQ470401) | Bacillus megaterium (EU723823) | 97% |
B6 (GQ470402) | Bacillus sp. 05 (EU399813) | 98% |
B7 (GQ470403) | Bacillus sp. C-17 (EU809476) | 100% |
B8 (GQ470404) | Bacillus sp. RM1A (EF765626) | 97% |
B9 (GQ470405) | Rhodococcus sp. VC-YC6630CNS139 (EU734599) | 98% |
B10 (GQ470406) | Pseudonocardia sp. (DQ448726) | 99% |
B11 (GQ470407) | Uncultured Flavobacteria bacterium clone (EF650874) | 100% |
B12 (GQ470408) | Bacillus benzoevorans (EU744622) | 100% |
Conclusion
In soil environments, nanomaterials come into contact with both organic matter and salts which create a substantially different microenvironment from test conditions found in water or culture media. Natural organic matter has been shown to disaggregate nC60 crystals and change the particle size39,40. On the other hand, salts at high concentrations in soil, especially calcium, will cause precipitation of the C60 from the aqueous suspension39, and as a result, the actual dose of nC60 will be much lower. Nonetheless, in the present study, the two smallest sized nC60 aggregates shifted the bacterial community composition in the soil with low organic matter content, suggesting that they are toxic to soil biota. Previous research has attributed the toxic effects to THF decomposition products rather than to nC60 alone41,42. However, our results demonstrate little adverse effects for the residual THF control in both soils. The highly complex nature of the soil system may have masked the adverse effects of any THF derived chemicals applied in trace amounts. Although organic solvents showed concentration-dependent effects on soil microbial activity and community structure, the co-introduced C60 have minimal effect even when their doses were much higher than that of nC60 aggregates. Their adverse effects might be shielded by large amount of carrier solvents. Overall, our results suggest that nC60 aggregates of smaller size may have negative impact on soil biota and soil organic matter may play a key role in modulating the environmental effect of nanomaterials.
Methods
Aqueous C60 preparation
Aqueous dispersions of C60 (nC60) aggregates were prepared using a procedure from Fortner et al.8 modified as follows. Approximately 12 mg of C60 (99.5%, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO ) were added to 500 mL of newly distilled THF (HPLC grade, 99.9%, Fisher Scientific) and stirred for 24 h in the dark at ambient temperature. Upon saturation, the solution was vacuum filtered through a 0.22 μm membrane. Then 250 mL of distilled water was added to 250 mL of C60-saturated THF solution with vigorous stirring. Changing the rate of water addition (1875, 1000, 250, 120, 30, 20 mL/min) will result in aggregates of different sizes. The mixed solutions were then gently heated using a rotary evaporator (Büchi Rotovap) to remove THF as described in Fortner et al.8, and concentrated as needed. A THF-R was generated in the same way but without adding C60. To maintain sterility, all containers, stir bars and distilled water were autoclaved. Concentrations of nC60 were measured spectrophotometrically6 and the resulting stock solutions were at 25–45 μg/mL. The average diameters of nC60 aggregates were determined by dynamic light scattering using a DynaPro-99 (Protein Solutions).
Soil sampling and microcosm experiments
The surface soils used in this study were the same as described previously43. The Drummer soil (fine-silty, mixed, superactive, mesic Typic Endoaquoll, 3.6% organic matter) was collected from the Purdue Agriculture Research Center, West Lafayette, IN. The Tracy soil (coarse-loamy, mixed, active, mesic Ultic Hapludalfs, 1.5% organic matter) was collected from the Pinney-Purdue Agriculture Center near Wanatah, IN. The soil properties were listed in Supplementary Table S2. Soils were sieved with 4 mm mesh, homogeneously mixed and stored in closed containers at room temperature.
To study the nC60 aggregate size effects, soil microcosm was constructed in a 250-mL screw-top jar containing 100 g of soil (dry weight). Soil moisture was adjusted with sterile distilled water to field capacity, which is 29.2% for the Drummer soil, and 15.2% for the Tracy soil. The microcosms were preincubated at 23 °C for 4 days. Then, nC60 aggregates with average diameter 51, 78, 108 or 250 nm were added into different microcosms at 1 μg/g soil, respectively, and thoroughly mixed with a spatula. Sterile distilled water and THF-R were added as controls. The treatments were reapplied weekly and done in triplicate at 23 °C for 7 weeks. SIR was conducted on 10 g (dry weight) subsamples taken from the microcosms weekly before reapplication of treatments. After 7 weeks, SIR, microbial biomass analysis and bacterial community profiling by PCR-DGGE were done.
For solvent co-introduction study, 50 g of soil (dry weight) was added into a 125-mL screw-top jar. Solvent saturated with C60 was generated by adding excess granular C60 (99.5%) to THF or toluene (HPLC, 99.9%, Fisher Scientific). The solutions were shaken for 24 h at 125 rpm on a gyratory shaker at room temperature. Undissolved C60 was removed with a 0.22 μm nylon membrane filter. After 4 days of preincubation, soil samples were exposed to C60-saturated solvents at 1, 5 and 10 mg/g soil, denoted as CL, CM and CH. The highest dose of the solvent was less than 10% of the soil field capacity to minimize toxic effects of the solvents. Because of the different solubility of C60 in toluene and THF, C60 was applied to soil samples at 0.01, 0.05 and 0.1 μg/g via THF, and 3.24, 16.18 and 32.37 μg/g via toluene, respectively, representing low to high doses of C60 (Table 2). Treatments with same amount of solvents and water controls were also included. All treatments were conducted at 23 °C in triplicate. Our preliminary study showed prolonged incubation with repeated application of low doses of solvents will result in microbial utilization of the solvents. Therefore, a two-week experiment with a one-time dosing was conducted. After two weeks, SIR, microbial biomass analysis and bacterial community profiling by PCR-DGGE were done.
Table 2. Dose of organic solvents and C60 applied to soil.
Dose | C60-toluene |
C60-THF |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
C60 (μg/g) | toluene (mg/g) | C60 (μg/g) | THF (mg/g) | |
CL | 3.24 | 1 | 0.01 | 1 |
CM | 16.18 | 5 | 0.05 | 5 |
CH | 32.37 | 10 | 0.1 | 10 |
Microbial biomass and activity assessment
After completion of the nC60 aggregate study (7 weeks) and the solvent co-introduction study (2 weeks), subsamples from the microcosms were sampled and freeze-dried. Microbial biomass was determined by measuring PL-PO4 of the lyophilized soil sample. The phospholipid was extracted and the PL-PO4 was measured using a previously described colorimetric method44.
The ability of the soil biomass to mineralize glucose was measured weekly for the 7-week nC60 aggregate study and at the end of solvent co-introduction study, by treating subsoil samples from each microcosm with D-glucose-UL-14C (specific activity = 264 mCi/mmol, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) to create an SIR response using a procedure as previously described43.
Soil bacterial community analysis using PCR-DGGE
At the indicated time, a 0.5-g soil sample from each microcosm was removed for DNA extraction. The genomic DNA was isolated using the FastDNA® SPIN kit for soil (MP Biomedical, Solon, OH) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The quantity and quality of isolated DNA were determined using a Nanodrop® ND-1000 Spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE). DNA extracts were also inspected by electrophoresis in 0.7% agarose gels with ethidium bromide staining.
PCR was performed using the universal primers for bacteria F338-GC and R534 as described by Muyzer et al.45 in a thermocycler (Eppendorf North America, Westbury, NY) using the following modified protocol: 94 °C for 5 min, followed by 30 cycles of 94 °C for 0.5 min, 55 °C for 0.5 min and 72 °C for 0.5 min, then a final extension step at 72 °C for 10 min. The resulting PCR products were analyzed with 1% agarose gel electrophoresis. The triplicate DGGE profiles were highly similar, and thus the triplicate PCR products were pooled for DGGE analysis.
PCR products were loaded on an 8% polyacrylamide gel with a denaturant gradient ranging from 35 to 70% and run at 60 °C and 75V for 16 h on a DCode system (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA). Bands were stained for 20 min in 1X TAE containing a 1:5,000 dilution of SYBR green I dye (Cambrex Bioscience, Walkersville, MD) and visualized under UV transillumination using the Kodak Imaging Station (Eastman Kodak Co., Rochester, NY). Band patterns and average intensities of the bands were analyzed using Quantity One, version 4.6.8 (Bio-Rad Laboratories). Profile similarity was analyzed using the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA).
The DGGE bands whose intensity appeared to be either enhanced or reduced were excised and suspended in 100 μL nuclease-free water overnight. The eluted DNA fragments were reamplified and run on the DGGE gel to ensure purity and correct mobility. Products showing one distinct band with correct mobility were further amplified with the primers for DGGE analysis but without a GC clamp. The PCR products were purified using a QIAquick gel extraction kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA) and submitted for sequencing at Purdue University’s Genomics Facility. The sequence data of DGGE bands were compared to sequences in GenBank database of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) using the BLASTn program, and have been deposited in the GenBank database (Table 1) under accession numbers GQ470401 to GQ470410, KP204446, and KP217807.
Additional Information
How to cite this article: Tong, Z.-H. et al. Influence of fullerene (C60) on soil bacterial communities: aqueous aggregate size and solvent co-introduction effects. Sci. Rep. 6, 28069; doi: 10.1038/srep28069 (2016).
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the Special S&T Program for Water Environment Improvement (Program No. 2012ZX07101-002), Natural Science Foundation of China (21477121, 51538012), Hefei Centre for Physical Science and Technology (2014FXCX010), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.
Footnotes
Author Contributions Z.-H.T. and R.F.T. designed the study; Z.-H.T. and M.B. performed the experiments; Z.-H.T wrote the manuscript. M.B., L.F.N., N.J.C., B.A. and R.F.T. reviewed and edited the manuscript.
References
- Bakry R. et al. Medicinal applications of fullerenes. Int. J. Nanomed. 2, 639–649 (2007). [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ma X. & Bouchard D. Formation of aqueous suspensions of fullerenes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43, 330–336 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baun A., Sørensen S. N., Rasmussen R. F., Hartmann N. B. & Koch C. B. Toxicity and bioaccumulation of xenobiotic organic compounds in the presence of aqueous suspensions of aggregates of nano-C60. Aquat. Toxicol. 86, 379–387 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tao X., He Y., Fortner J. D., Chen Y. & Hughes J. B. Effects of aqueous stable fullerene nanocrystal (nC60) on copper (trace necessary nutrient metal): enhanced toxicity and accumulation of copper in Daphnia magna. Chemosphere 92, 1245–1252 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fortner J. D. et al. C60 in water: nanocrystal formation and microbial response. Environ. Sci. Technol. 39, 4307–4316 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tong Z. H., Bischoff M., Nies L., Applegate B. & Turco R. F. Impact of fullerene (C60) on a soil microbial community. Environ. Sci. Technol. 41, 2985–2991 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nyberg L., Turco R. F. & Nies L. Assessing the impact of nanomaterials on anaerobic microbial communities. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42, 1938–1943 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lyon D. Y., Fortner J. D., Sayes C. M., Colvin V. L. & Hughes J. B. Bacterial cell association and antimicrobial activity of a C60 water suspension. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 24, 2757–2762 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Waissi-Leinonen G. C. et al. Fullerenes (nC60) affect the growth and development of the sediment-dwelling invertebrate Chironomus riparius larvae. Environ. Pollut. 206, 17–23 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kang S., Herzberg M., Rodrigues D. F. & Elimelech M. Antibacterial effects of carbon nanotubes: size does matter. Langmuir 24, 6409–6413 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Aschberger K., Micheletti C., Sokull-Klüttgen B. & Christensen F. M. Analysis of currently available data for characterising the risk of engineered nanomaterials to the environment and human health–lessons learned from four case studies. Environ. Int. 37, 1143–1156 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lyon D. Y., Adams L. K., Falkner J. C. & Alvarez P. J. J. Antibacterial activity of fullerene water suspensions: effects of preparation method and particle size. Environ. Sci. Technol. 40, 4360–4366 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jafvert C. T. & Kulkarni P. P. Buckminsterfullerene’s (C60) octanol-water partition coefficient (Kow) and aqueous solubility. Environ. Sci. Technol. 72, 1700–1705 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- David R. M. et al. Interference with xenobiotic metabolic activity by the commonly used vehicle solvents dimethylsulfoxide and methanol in zebrafish (Danio rerio) larvae but not Daphnia magna. Chemosphere 88, 912–917 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee P. H., Ong S. K., Golchin J. & Nelson G. L. Use of solvents to enhance PAH biodegradation of coal tar-contaminated soils. Water Res. 35, 3941–3949 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vandermeer K. D. & Daugulis A. J. Enhanced degradation of a mixture of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by a defined microbial consortium in a two-phase partitioning bioreactor. Biodegradation 18, 211–221 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ruoff R. S., Tse D. S., Malhotra R. & Lorents D. C. Solubility of C60 in a variety of solvents. J. Phys. Chem. 97, 3379–3383 (1993). [Google Scholar]
- Deguchi S., Alargova R. G. & Tsujii K. Stable dispersions of fullerenes, C60 and C70, in water. preparation and characterization. Langmuir 17, 6013–6017 (2001). [Google Scholar]
- Song M. Y. et al. Size-dependent toxicity of nano-C60 aggregates: more sensitive indication by apoptosis-related Bax translocation in cultured human cells. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 3457–3464 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Broos K. et al. Soil factors controlling the toxicity of copper and zinc to microbial processes in Australian soils. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26, 583–590 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shi W., Bischoff M., Turco R. F. & Konopka A. Long-term effects of chromium and lead upon the activity of soil microbial communities. Appl. Soil Ecol. 21, 169–177 (2002). [Google Scholar]
- Daye K. J., Groff J. C., Kirpekar A. C. & Mazumder R. High efficiency degradation of tetrahydrofuran (THF) using a membrane bioreactor: identification of THF-degrading cultures of Pseudonocardia sp. strain M1 and Rhodococcus ruber isolate M2. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 30, 705–714 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grove J. K. & Stein O. R. Polar organic solvent removal in microcosm constructed wetlands. Water Res. 39, 4040–4050 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vainberg S. et al. Biodegradation of ether pollutants by Pseudonocardia sp. strain ENV478. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72, 5218–5224 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zelles L. Fatty acid patterns of phospholipids and lipopolysaccharides in the characterization of microbial communities in soil: a review. Biol. Fertil. Soils 29, 111–129 (1999). [Google Scholar]
- Leckie S. E., Prescotta C. E., Graystonb S. J., Neufeld J. D. & Mohn W. W. Comparison of chloroform fumigation-extraction, phospholipid fatty acid, and DNA methods to determine microbial biomass in forest humus. Soil Biol. Biochem. 36, 529–532 (2004). [Google Scholar]
- Zink K. G., Mangelsdorf K., Granina L. & Horsfield B. Estimation of bacterial biomass in subsurface sediments by quantifying intact membrane phospholipids. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 390, 885–896 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Emmerling C., Udelhoven V. & Schroder D. Response of soil microbial biomass and activity to agricultural de-intensification over a 10 year period. Soil Biol. Biochem. 33, 2105–2114 (2001). [Google Scholar]
- Johansen A. et al. Effects of C60 fullerene nanoparticles on soil bacteria and protozoans. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 27, 1895–1903 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hartmann N. B., Buendia I. M., Bak J. & Baun A. Degradability of aged aquatic suspensions of C60 nanoparticles. Environ. Pollut. 159, 3134–3137 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Murase J. & Frenzel P. A methane-driven microbial food web in a wetland rice soil. Environ. Microbiol. 9, 3025–3034 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Adams C. P., Walker K. A., Obare S. O. & Docherty K. M. Size-dependent antimicrobial effects of novel palladium nanoparticles. PLoS One 9, e85981 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen J. W., Xiu Z. M., Lowry G. V. & Alvarez P. J. J. Effect of natural organic matter on toxicity and reactivity of nano-scale zero-valent iron. Water Res. 45, 1995–2001 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wirth S. M., Lowry G. V. & Tilton R. D. Natural organic matter alters biofilm tolerance to silver nanoparticles and dissolved silver. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 12687–12696 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Olapade O. A. & Ronk A. J. Isolation, characterization and community diversity of indigenous putative toluene-degrading bacterial populations with catechol-2,3-dioxygenase genes in contaminated soils. Microb. Ecol. 69, 59–65 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang L., Qiao N., Sun F. Q. & Shao Z. Z. Isolation, gene detection and solvent tolerance of benzene, toluene and xylene degrading bacteria from nearshore surface water and Pacific Ocean sediment. Extremophiles 12, 335–342 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McNamara N. P. et al. The sensitivity of a forest soil microbial community to acute gamma-irradiation. Appl. Soil Ecol. 37, 1–9 (2007). [Google Scholar]
- Klieve A. V., Plumb J. J. & Blackall L. L. Isolation and characterization of an unusual bacterium, allied to the soil bacterium Bacillus benzoevorans, from feedlot manure pads in Australia. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 29, 71–75 (1999). [Google Scholar]
- Chen K. L. & Elimelech M. Influence of humic acid on the aggregation kinetics of fullerene (C60) nanoparticles in monovalent and divalent electrolyte solutions. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 309, 126–134 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xie B., Xu Z. H., Guo W. H. & Li Q. L. Impact of natural organic matter on the physicochemical properties of aqueous C60 nanoparticles. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42, 2853–2859 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Henry T. B. et al. Attributing effects of aqueous C60 nano-aggregates to tetrahydrofuran decomposition products in larval zebrafish by assessment of gene expression. Environ. Health Perspect. 115, 1059–1065 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Spohn P. et al. C60 fullerene: a powerful antioxidant or a damaging agent? The importance of an in-depth material characterization prior to toxicity assays. Environ. Pollut. 157, 1134–1139 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tong Z. H. et al. Response of soil microorganisms to as-produced and functionalized single-wall carbon nanotubes (SWNTs). Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 13471–13479 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Blume E., Bischoff M., Moorman T. B. & Turco R. F. Degradation and binding of atrazine in surface and subsurface soils. Agric. Food Chem. 52, 7382–7388 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Muyzer G., Dewaal E. C. & Uitterlinden A. G. Profiling of complex microbial-populations by denaturing gradient gel-electrophoresis analysis of polymerase chain reaction-amplified genes-coding for 16s ribosomal-RNA. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 59, 695–700 (1993). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.