Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications
. 2016 Mar 15;72(Pt 4):509–511. doi: 10.1107/S2056989016003923

Redetermination of cytosinium hydrogen maleate–cytosine (1/1) from the original data

Jan Fábry a,*
PMCID: PMC4910327  PMID: 27375877

The title structure has been redetermined from the data published by Benali-Cherif, Falek & Direm [Acta Cryst. (2009), E65, o3058–o3059]. The improvement of the present redetermination consists in the discovery of the disorder of one of the H atoms with occupancies equal to 0.55 (2) and 0.45 (2), respectively. These H atoms are involved in an N⋯N hydrogen bond and are shifted towards its centre.

Keywords: crystal structure, redetermination, hydrogen bonding, refinement constraints, refinement restraints, Cambridge Structural Database

Abstract

The title salt, C4H6N3O+·C4H3O4 ·C4H5N3O, has been redetermined from the data published by Benali-Cherif, Falek & Direm [Acta Cryst. (2009), E65, o3058–o3059]. The improvement of the present redetermination consists in the discovery of the splitting of one of the H atoms into two disordered positions, the occupancies of which are equal to 0.55 (2) and 0.45 (2). These H atoms are involved in an N⋯N hydrogen bond and are shifted towards its centre. The disorder of these H atoms is in agreement with a similar environment of the two independent, but chemically equivalent, cytosinium/cytosine mol­ecules.

Chemical context  

Structures which contain hydroxyl, secondary and primary amine groups are often determined incorrectly because of an assumed geometry of these groups and the subsequent applied constraints or restraints. In such cases, the correct geometry is missed as it is not verified by inspection of the difference electron-density maps. Thus a considerable number of structures could have been determined more correctly – cf. Figs. 1 and 2 in Fábry et al. (2014). The inclusion of such structures causes bias in the crystallographic databases.graphic file with name e-72-00509-scheme1.jpg

Figure 1.

Figure 1

View of the constituent mol­ecules and atoms of the title structure in the original article [Benali-Cherif, Falek & Direm (2009). Acta Cryst. E65, o3058–o3059]. The displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

A section of the difference electron-density map for the present redetermined title structure, which shows the build up of the electron density between atoms N1 and N3. Positive and negative electron densities are indicated by continuous and dashed lines, respectively. The increment between the contours is 0.05 e Å−3 (JANA2006; Petříček et al., 2014).

In the course of recalculation of suspect structures which were retrieved from the Cambridge Crystallographic Database (Groom & Allen, 2014), a defect in the structure determination of 2-amino-4,6-di­meth­oxy­pyrimidine–4-amino­benzoic acid (1/1) by Benali-Cherif et al. (2009) has been found; the CSD refcode is DUJCAN. The aim of the present article is to demonstrate how the original structure determination can be improved.

Structural commentary  

The structure of the title compound has been described by Benali-Cherif et al. (2009). In that article, the hydrogen atom H3b was attached to atom N3b and refined with a distance constraint of N3b—H3b = 0.86 Å with U iso(H3b) = 1.2U eq(N3b). This hydrogen is involved in the hydrogen bond N3b—H3b⋯N3a (Fig. 1).

However, inspection of the difference electron density map of the recalculated structure has shown that hydrogen atom H3b is disordered over two positions (Fig. 2), between atoms N3a and N3b. Thus, atom H3b was split into two atoms, labelled as H1n3b and H1n3a, with respective occupancies 0.52 (2) and 0.48 (2). These hydrogen atoms remain involved in the N3a⋯N3b hydrogen bond (Table 1), as shown in Fig. 3.

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N1b—H1b⋯O2i 0.956 (15) 1.824 (15) 2.7718 (14) 170.8 (13)
N8b—H8b1⋯O7b ii 0.900 (17) 2.030 (18) 2.8517 (14) 151.2 (13)
N8b—H8b2⋯O7a 0.992 (15) 1.850 (15) 2.8411 (15) 177.4 (12)
C5b—H5b⋯O2iii 0.93 2.43 3.3347 (16) 164.60
N1a—H1a⋯O4 0.952 (14) 1.793 (14) 2.7411 (14) 173.2 (12)
N8a—H8a1⋯O7b 0.897 (16) 1.959 (16) 2.8555 (15) 179.0 (13)
N8a—H8a2⋯O7a iv 0.885 (17) 2.028 (18) 2.8368 (15) 151.5 (14)
C5a—H5a⋯O4iv 0.93 2.37 3.2970 (16) 175.15
O1—H3⋯O3 1.223 (14) 1.201 (14) 2.4155 (12) 170.6 (15)
O1—H3⋯C1 1.223 (14) 2.071 (15) 3.0775 (15) 136.7 (11)
O3—H3⋯O1 1.201 (14) 1.223 (14) 2.4155 (12) 170.6 (15)
O3—H3⋯C4 1.201 (14) 2.100 (15) 3.0927 (15) 137.4 (12)
N3b—H1n3b⋯N3a 0.861 (16) 1.979 (16) 2.8398 (14) 178 (2)
N3a—H1n3a⋯N3b 0.873 (18) 1.970 (18) 2.8398 (14) 174 (3)

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (ii) Inline graphic; (iii) Inline graphic; (iv) Inline graphic.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

View of the constituent mol­ecules and atoms of the present redetermined title structure. The displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level.

The observed disorder of the secondary amine hydrogen atoms is probably due to the chemical equality of two symmetry-independent cytosinium/cytosine mol­ecules and their quite similar environments. Otherwise, the description of the hydrogen-bond pattern by Benali-Cherif et al. (2009) remains intact because locally one of the nitro­gen atoms, N3a or N3b, acts as a donor while the other acts as an acceptor of the hydrogen bond.

The hydrogen atom H3, which was situated about the centre of the hydrogen bond O3—H3⋯O1 has also been checked (Fig. 4). It turns out that the build-up of the electron density is not split into two positions and the original position determined by Benali-Cherif et al. (2009) is correct.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

A section of the difference electron-density map for the present redetermined title structure, which shows the build up of the electron density between atoms O1 and O3. Positive and negative electron densities are indicated by continuous and dashed lines, respectively. The increment between the contours is 0.05 e Å−3 (JANA2006; Petříček et al., 2014).

In a broader sense, the present redetermination emphasizes how important it is to carefully examine the difference electron-density maps during structure determinations.

Supra­molecular features  

The graph set analysis (Etter et al., 1990) of the title compound has been described by Benali-Cherif et al. (2009).

Database survey  

The CIF file of the article by Benali-Cherif et al. (2009) has been included in the Cambridge Crystallographic Database (Groom & Allen, 2014) under the refcode DUJCAN.

Synthesis and crystallization  

The preparation of the title compound has been described by Benali-Cherif et al. (2009).

Refinement  

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2. All the hydrogen atoms were discernible in the difference electron density maps. The aryl hydrogen atoms were refined as constrained with Car­yl—Har­yl = 0.93 Å and U iso(Har­yl) = 1.2U eq(Car­yl). The displacement parameter of the hydroxyl hydrogen atom H3 was constrained by U iso(H3) = 1.5U eq(O3). The hydrogen atoms of the primary and secondary amine groups were constrained by U iso(Hamine) = 1.2U eq(Namine). In addition, the distances of the disordered amine hydrogen atoms, H1n36 and H1n3b, were refined with the distance restraint N—H = 0.87 (1) Å, and their occupational parameters constrained to fulfill the condition that their sum = 1 [viz. 0.55 (2) (H1n3b) and 0.45 (2) (H1n3a)].

Table 2. Experimental details.

Crystal data
Chemical formula C4H6N3O+·C4H3O4 ·C4H5N3O
M r 338.29
Crystal system, space group Monoclinic, C2/c
Temperature (K) 298
a, b, c (Å) 27.3226 (5), 7.3618 (2), 14.6742 (4)
β (°) 93.905 (1)
V3) 2944.77 (13)
Z 8
Radiation type Mo Kα
μ (mm−1) 0.13
Crystal size (mm) 0.3 × 0.15 × 0.1
 
Data collection
Diffractometer Nonius KappaCCD
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 3σ(I)] reflections 3490, 3474, 2367
R int 0.043
(sin θ/λ)max−1) 0.661
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 3σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.038, 0.093, 1.85
No. of reflections 3474
No. of parameters 246
No. of restraints 2
H-atom treatment H atoms treated by a mixture of restrained and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) 0.20, −0.20

Computer programs: KappaCCD Server Software (Nonius, 1998), DENZO and SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997), SIR2004 (Burla et al., 2005), PLATON (Spek, 2009) and JANA2006 (Petříček et al., 2014). Extinction correction: Becker & Coppens (1974).

Nine reflections [5 1 0; −9 1 1;-1 1 1; −8 2 1; 4 2 1; −2 0 2; 0 0 2;-3 1 2; −20 0 8; 22 2 8] for which ||F o| − |F c|| >10σ(F) were omitted from the final cycles of refinement.

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989016003923/su5280sup1.cif

e-72-00509-sup1.cif (32.9KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989016003923/su5280Isup2.hkl

e-72-00509-Isup2.hkl (143.4KB, hkl)

Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989016003923/su5280Isup3.smi

CCDC reference: 1459296

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Acknowledgments

The author is grateful for the support of the Ministry of Education of the Czech Republic under Project NPU I-LO1603.

supplementary crystallographic information

Crystal data

C4H6N3O+·C4H3O4·C4H5N3O F(000) = 1408
Mr = 338.29 Dx = 1.526 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/c Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -C 2yc Cell parameters from 3490 reflections
a = 27.3226 (5) Å θ = 2.8–28.0°
b = 7.3618 (2) Å µ = 0.13 mm1
c = 14.6742 (4) Å T = 298 K
β = 93.905 (1)° Prism, colourless
V = 2944.77 (13) Å3 0.3 × 0.15 × 0.1 mm
Z = 8

Data collection

Nonius KappaCCD diffractometer 2367 reflections with I > 3σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube Rint = 0.043
Graphite monochromator θmax = 28.0°, θmin = 2.8°
ω–θ scans h = 0→35
3490 measured reflections k = 0→9
3474 independent reflections l = −19→19

Refinement

Refinement on F2 H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.038 Weighting scheme based on measured s.u.'s w = 1/(σ2(I) + 0.0004I2)
wR(F2) = 0.093 (Δ/σ)max = 0.022
S = 1.85 Δρmax = 0.20 e Å3
3474 reflections Δρmin = −0.20 e Å3
246 parameters Extinction correction: B–C type 1 Lorentzian isotropic (Becker & Coppens, 1974)
2 restraints Extinction coefficient: 21000 (5000)
33 constraints

Special details

Refinement. This part differs from the original article by Benali-Cherif et al. (2009). In the refinement, F2 > 3σ(F2) has been used as a criterion for observed diffractions.The diffractions for which ||Fo|-|Fc||>10σ(F) were discarded from the refinement. This refers to the diffractions 5 1 0; −9 1 1; −1 1 1; −8 2 1; 4 2 1; −2 0 2; 0 0 2; −3 1 2; −20 0 8; 22 2 8.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq Occ. (<1)
O7b 0.33926 (3) 1.06385 (11) 0.29287 (6) 0.0445 (3)
N1b 0.40065 (3) 0.90018 (14) 0.23744 (7) 0.0400 (3)
H1b 0.4157 (5) 1.011 (2) 0.2197 (9) 0.048*
N3b 0.33591 (3) 0.75686 (12) 0.30318 (7) 0.0368 (3)
N8b 0.33297 (5) 0.44786 (15) 0.31476 (9) 0.0506 (4)
H8b1 0.3454 (5) 0.338 (2) 0.3026 (9) 0.0607*
H8b2 0.3002 (6) 0.458 (2) 0.3394 (9) 0.0607*
C2b 0.35770 (4) 0.91429 (16) 0.27860 (8) 0.0352 (4)
C4b 0.35664 (4) 0.59317 (16) 0.28928 (8) 0.0386 (4)
C5b 0.40187 (4) 0.58331 (18) 0.24835 (9) 0.0443 (4)
H5b 0.416945 0.472174 0.23913 0.0531*
C6b 0.42233 (5) 0.73892 (18) 0.22326 (9) 0.0443 (4)
H6b 0.451959 0.735942 0.195619 0.0531*
O7a 0.23772 (3) 0.47438 (12) 0.38018 (7) 0.0481 (3)
N1a 0.17576 (3) 0.63613 (15) 0.43512 (7) 0.0413 (3)
H1a 0.1595 (4) 0.528 (2) 0.4518 (9) 0.0496*
N3a 0.24303 (3) 0.78185 (13) 0.37815 (7) 0.0375 (3)
N8a 0.24808 (5) 1.09110 (16) 0.37611 (9) 0.0522 (4)
H8a1 0.2767 (6) 1.0812 (19) 0.3501 (10) 0.0627*
H8a2 0.2363 (5) 1.200 (2) 0.3886 (10) 0.0627*
C2a 0.21958 (4) 0.62341 (16) 0.39695 (8) 0.0364 (4)
C4a 0.22340 (4) 0.94481 (16) 0.39665 (8) 0.0388 (4)
C5a 0.17788 (4) 0.95478 (18) 0.43679 (9) 0.0439 (4)
H5a 0.164021 1.066081 0.450387 0.0527*
C6a 0.15539 (5) 0.79794 (18) 0.45457 (9) 0.0447 (4)
H6a 0.125322 0.800462 0.480683 0.0536*
O1 0.00024 (3) 0.51326 (12) 0.62974 (6) 0.0463 (3)
O2 −0.05067 (3) 0.30108 (13) 0.67262 (7) 0.0560 (3)
O3 0.07413 (3) 0.53082 (11) 0.54869 (6) 0.0433 (3)
H3 0.0368 (5) 0.535 (2) 0.5874 (9) 0.0649*
O4 0.12217 (3) 0.33900 (14) 0.48088 (7) 0.0555 (3)
C1 0.08603 (4) 0.37076 (18) 0.52453 (8) 0.0394 (4)
C2 0.05595 (5) 0.21144 (19) 0.54864 (10) 0.0512 (5)
H1 0.067397 0.100138 0.528962 0.0614*
C3 0.01546 (5) 0.20204 (19) 0.59362 (10) 0.0523 (5)
H2 0.003281 0.085236 0.600501 0.0628*
C4 −0.01355 (4) 0.34770 (18) 0.63476 (8) 0.0415 (4)
H1n3b 0.3079 (5) 0.763 (3) 0.3267 (14) 0.0442* 0.554 (16)
H1n3a 0.2718 (6) 0.783 (4) 0.3556 (18) 0.045* 0.446 (16)

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
O7b 0.0462 (5) 0.0256 (5) 0.0628 (6) 0.0015 (3) 0.0110 (4) −0.0015 (4)
N1b 0.0413 (6) 0.0342 (6) 0.0454 (6) −0.0014 (4) 0.0100 (5) −0.0016 (5)
N3b 0.0375 (5) 0.0249 (6) 0.0486 (6) 0.0009 (4) 0.0073 (4) −0.0018 (4)
N8b 0.0551 (7) 0.0278 (6) 0.0705 (8) 0.0025 (5) 0.0171 (6) 0.0000 (5)
C2b 0.0374 (6) 0.0291 (7) 0.0388 (7) 0.0009 (5) 0.0007 (5) −0.0022 (5)
C4b 0.0450 (6) 0.0285 (7) 0.0420 (7) 0.0019 (5) 0.0002 (5) −0.0021 (5)
C5b 0.0452 (7) 0.0368 (8) 0.0516 (8) 0.0105 (5) 0.0093 (6) −0.0029 (6)
C6b 0.0425 (6) 0.0435 (8) 0.0476 (8) 0.0062 (5) 0.0093 (6) −0.0040 (6)
O7a 0.0468 (5) 0.0246 (5) 0.0740 (6) 0.0004 (4) 0.0134 (4) −0.0008 (4)
N1a 0.0382 (5) 0.0335 (6) 0.0532 (6) −0.0044 (4) 0.0100 (5) −0.0018 (5)
N3a 0.0354 (5) 0.0246 (5) 0.0531 (6) 0.0008 (4) 0.0079 (4) −0.0001 (4)
N8a 0.0515 (6) 0.0263 (6) 0.0806 (9) 0.0013 (5) 0.0171 (6) 0.0004 (6)
C2a 0.0374 (6) 0.0269 (7) 0.0448 (7) 0.0008 (5) 0.0024 (5) 0.0000 (5)
C4a 0.0400 (6) 0.0296 (7) 0.0467 (7) 0.0024 (5) 0.0009 (5) −0.0017 (5)
C5a 0.0421 (7) 0.0341 (7) 0.0560 (8) 0.0085 (5) 0.0059 (6) −0.0059 (6)
C6a 0.0375 (6) 0.0457 (8) 0.0514 (8) 0.0032 (5) 0.0073 (6) −0.0065 (6)
O1 0.0411 (5) 0.0411 (6) 0.0582 (6) −0.0016 (4) 0.0155 (4) −0.0041 (4)
O2 0.0471 (5) 0.0532 (6) 0.0703 (7) −0.0059 (4) 0.0234 (5) 0.0033 (5)
O3 0.0426 (5) 0.0365 (5) 0.0521 (5) −0.0035 (4) 0.0137 (4) −0.0025 (4)
O4 0.0547 (5) 0.0476 (6) 0.0677 (6) −0.0001 (4) 0.0288 (5) −0.0052 (5)
C1 0.0402 (6) 0.0388 (7) 0.0398 (7) 0.0003 (5) 0.0070 (5) −0.0002 (6)
C2 0.0545 (8) 0.0338 (8) 0.0675 (9) 0.0020 (6) 0.0202 (7) −0.0028 (6)
C3 0.0544 (8) 0.0332 (8) 0.0714 (10) −0.0045 (6) 0.0185 (7) 0.0033 (7)
C4 0.0383 (6) 0.0417 (8) 0.0449 (7) −0.0028 (5) 0.0059 (5) 0.0025 (6)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

O7b—C2b 1.2345 (14) N3a—H1n3a 0.873 (18)
N1b—H1b 0.956 (15) N8a—H8a1 0.897 (16)
N1b—C2b 1.3600 (15) N8a—H8a2 0.885 (17)
N1b—C6b 1.3492 (17) N8a—C4a 1.3165 (17)
N3b—C2b 1.3627 (15) H8a1—H8a2 1.54 (2)
N3b—C4b 1.3528 (15) C4a—C5a 1.4137 (17)
N3b—H1n3b 0.861 (16) C5a—H5a 0.93
N8b—H8b1 0.900 (17) C5a—C6a 1.3420 (19)
N8b—H8b2 0.992 (15) C6a—H6a 0.93
N8b—C4b 1.3174 (17) O1—H3 1.223 (14)
H8b1—H8b2 1.64 (2) O1—C4 1.2793 (16)
C4b—C5b 1.4123 (17) O2—C4 1.2376 (15)
C5b—H5b 0.93 O3—H3 1.201 (14)
C5b—C6b 1.3373 (18) O3—C1 1.2789 (15)
C6b—H6b 0.93 O4—C1 1.2354 (15)
O7a—C2a 1.2356 (14) C1—C2 1.4886 (19)
N1a—H1a 0.952 (14) C2—H1 0.93
N1a—C2a 1.3591 (15) C2—C3 1.328 (2)
N1a—C6a 1.3535 (17) C3—H2 0.93
N3a—C2a 1.3679 (15) C3—C4 1.4859 (19)
N3a—C4a 1.3493 (15) H1n3b—H1n3a 1.11 (2)
H1b—N1b—C2b 117.2 (8) H8a2—N8a—C4a 119.4 (10)
H1b—N1b—C6b 120.3 (8) O7a—C2a—N1a 121.32 (11)
C2b—N1b—C6b 122.48 (11) O7a—C2a—N3a 121.14 (10)
C2b—N3b—C4b 121.52 (10) N1a—C2a—N3a 117.53 (10)
C2b—N3b—H1n3b 118.7 (15) N3a—C4a—N8a 117.68 (11)
C4b—N3b—H1n3b 119.8 (15) N3a—C4a—C5a 120.20 (11)
H8b1—N8b—H8b2 120.1 (13) N8a—C4a—C5a 122.12 (12)
H8b1—N8b—C4b 118.2 (9) C4a—C5a—H5a 121.18
H8b2—N8b—C4b 121.2 (9) C4a—C5a—C6a 117.64 (12)
O7b—C2b—N1b 121.19 (11) H5a—C5a—C6a 121.18
O7b—C2b—N3b 121.54 (10) N1a—C6a—C5a 121.06 (12)
N1b—C2b—N3b 117.28 (10) N1a—C6a—H6a 119.47
N3b—C4b—N8b 117.51 (11) C5a—C6a—H6a 119.47
N3b—C4b—C5b 119.83 (11) H3—O1—C4 114.1 (8)
N8b—C4b—C5b 122.67 (11) H3—O3—C1 113.3 (8)
C4b—C5b—H5b 121.07 O1—H3—O3 170.6 (15)
C4b—C5b—C6b 117.86 (12) O3—C1—O4 123.05 (12)
H5b—C5b—C6b 121.07 O3—C1—C2 120.35 (11)
N1b—C6b—C5b 121.00 (12) O4—C1—C2 116.60 (12)
N1b—C6b—H6b 119.5 C1—C2—H1 114.68
C5b—C6b—H6b 119.5 C1—C2—C3 130.64 (13)
H1a—N1a—C2a 119.2 (8) H1—C2—C3 114.68
H1a—N1a—C6a 118.4 (8) C2—C3—H2 114.74
C2a—N1a—C6a 122.28 (11) C2—C3—C4 130.53 (13)
C2a—N3a—C4a 121.30 (10) H2—C3—C4 114.74
C2a—N3a—H1n3a 121.9 (18) O1—C4—O2 122.93 (12)
C4a—N3a—H1n3a 116.8 (18) O1—C4—C3 119.78 (11)
H8a1—N8a—H8a2 120.2 (14) O2—C4—C3 117.28 (12)
H8a1—N8a—C4a 120.4 (9)

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
N1b—H1b···O2i 0.956 (15) 1.824 (15) 2.7718 (14) 170.8 (13)
N8b—H8b1···O7bii 0.900 (17) 2.030 (18) 2.8517 (14) 151.2 (13)
N8b—H8b2···O7a 0.992 (15) 1.850 (15) 2.8411 (15) 177.4 (12)
C5b—H5b···O2iii 0.93 2.43 3.3347 (16) 164.60
N1a—H1a···O4 0.952 (14) 1.793 (14) 2.7411 (14) 173.2 (12)
N8a—H8a1···O7b 0.897 (16) 1.959 (16) 2.8555 (15) 179.0 (13)
N8a—H8a2···O7aiv 0.885 (17) 2.028 (18) 2.8368 (15) 151.5 (14)
C5a—H5a···O4iv 0.93 2.37 3.2970 (16) 175.15
O1—H3···O3 1.223 (14) 1.201 (14) 2.4155 (12) 170.6 (15)
O1—H3···C1 1.223 (14) 2.071 (15) 3.0775 (15) 136.7 (11)
O3—H3···O1 1.201 (14) 1.223 (14) 2.4155 (12) 170.6 (15)
O3—H3···C4 1.201 (14) 2.100 (15) 3.0927 (15) 137.4 (12)
N3b—H1n3b···N3a 0.861 (16) 1.979 (16) 2.8398 (14) 178 (2)
N3a—H1n3a···N3b 0.873 (18) 1.970 (18) 2.8398 (14) 174 (3)

Symmetry codes: (i) x+1/2, −y+3/2, z−1/2; (ii) x, y−1, z; (iii) x+1/2, −y+1/2, z−1/2; (iv) x, y+1, z.

References

  1. Becker, P. J. & Coppens, P. (1974). Acta Cryst. A30, 129–147.
  2. Benali-Cherif, N., Falek, W. & Direm, A. (2009). Acta Cryst. E65, o3058–o3059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  3. Burla, M. C., Caliandro, R., Camalli, M., Carrozzini, B., Cascarano, G. L., De Caro, L., Giacovazzo, C., Polidori, G. & Spagna, R. (2005). J. Appl. Cryst. 38, 381–388.
  4. Etter, M. C., MacDonald, J. C. & Bernstein, J. (1990). Acta Cryst. B46, 256–262. [DOI] [PubMed]
  5. Fábry, J., Dušek, M., Vaněk, P., Rafalovskyi, I., Hlinka, J. & Urban, J. (2014). Acta Cryst. C70, 1153–1160. [DOI] [PubMed]
  6. Groom, C. R. & Allen, F. H. (2014). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 662–671. [DOI] [PubMed]
  7. Nonius (1998). KappaCCD Server Software. Nonius BV, Delft, The Netherlands.
  8. Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Methods in Enzymology, Vol. 276, Macromolecular Crystallography, Part A, edited by C. W. Carter Jr & R. M. Sweet, pp. 307–326. New York: Academic Press.
  9. Petříček, V., Dušek, M. & Palatinus, L. (2014). Z. Kristallogr. 229, 345–352.
  10. Spek, A. L. (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148–155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989016003923/su5280sup1.cif

e-72-00509-sup1.cif (32.9KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989016003923/su5280Isup2.hkl

e-72-00509-Isup2.hkl (143.4KB, hkl)

Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989016003923/su5280Isup3.smi

CCDC reference: 1459296

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES