Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications
. 2016 Mar 31;72(Pt 4):556–558. doi: 10.1107/S2056989016004497

Crystal structure of 1,2-bis­[(1H-imidazol-2-yl)methylidene]hydrazine and its one-dimensional hydrogen-bonding network

Chia-Hwa Lee a, Gene-Hsiang Lee b,*
PMCID: PMC4910350  PMID: 27375888

In the title compound, two imidazolyl groups are separated by a zigzag –CH=N—N=CH– linkage. Each mol­ecule forms four N—H⋯N hydrogen bonds with two neighbouring mol­ecules to constitute a one-dimensional ladder-like structure along the a axis.

Keywords: crystal structure, imidazole derivative, hydrogen bonding, supra­molecular architecture

Abstract

In the title compound, C8H8N6, two imidazolyl groups are separated by a zigzag –CH=N—N=CH– linkage. An inversion center is located at the mid-point of the N—N single bond and the complete molecule is generated by symmetry. In the crystal, each mol­ecule forms four N—H⋯N hydrogen bonds with two neighbouring mol­ecules to constitute a one-dimensional ladder-like structure propagating along the a-axis direction.

Chemical context  

Supra­molecular chemistry is a fascinating topic, and mol­ecular assemblies via inter­molecular non-covalent binding inter­actions (i.e. hydrogen bonding, ionic and π–π stacking inter­actions) have attracted much attentions in the field of crystal engineering over the last decade. In particular, hydrogen bonding, which is a powerful organizing force in designing a variety of supra­molecular and solid-state architectures (Subramanian & Zaworotko, 1994), is not only used extensively to generate numerous network structures consisting of discrete organic and organometallic compounds (Desiraju, 2000), but is also responsible for inter­esting physical properties of these supra­molecular arrangements, such as electrical, optical, magnetic, etc. (Bacchi & Pelagatti, 2016; Lindoy & Atkinson, 2000; Létard et al., 1998).graphic file with name e-72-00556-scheme1.jpg

Imidazoles, containing two nitro­gen atoms, possess both hydrogen-bond donating and accepting sites and are superior building blocks for supra­molecular architectures. Many imidazole-containing polydentate ligands derived from hydrazine find a wide range of applications in coordination chemistry owing to their chelating ability (Zhou et al., 2012). In this paper we report the synthesis of 1,2-bis­[(1H-imidazol-2-yl)methyl­ene]hydrazine (I), designed to consist of nitro­gen donors and acceptors, and the supra­molecular architecture it gives rise to via hydrogen bonds. The functionality of mol­ecule (I) as a bridge between metal centers for the formation of multi-dimensional structures will be discussed in subsequent publications.

Structural commentary  

The mol­ecular structure of the title compound consists of two imidazolyl groups linked by a zigzag –CH=N—N=CH– linkage (Fig. 1) and with C5⋯C5i = 5.937 (3) Å [the distance between the centroids of the imidazolyl groups is 8.103 (3) Å]. The mol­ecule possesses an inversion center located in the mid-point of the N—N single bond and the complete molecule is generated by symmetry. The mol­ecule appears in a Z(EE)Z configuration and its geometry is similar to that of 1,2-bis­[(1H-imidazol-5-yl)methyl­ene]hydrazine (Pinto et al., 2013) and 1,2-bis­[(thio­phene-3-yl)methyl­ene]hydrazine (Kim & Lee, 2008).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The mol­ecular structure of (I), showing the atom-labeling scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level. [Symmetry code: (i) −x, −y + 1, −z + 2.]

The mol­ecule (I) has a planar (r.m.s. deviation = 0.012 Å) structure which, in addition to the observed bond distances, suggests partial delocalization of the π electrons over the whole mol­ecule. The geometric parameters, viz., the N—N single bond [N7—N7i = 1.409 (2) Å; symmetry code: (i) –x, −y + 1, −z + 2] , C=N double bond [C6—N7 = 1.2795 (19) Å] and C=N—N bond angle [C6=N7—N7i = 111.41 (15)°], are comparable to the corresponding parameters found in 1,4-bis­(3-pyrid­yl)-2,3-di­aza-1,3-butadiene [Dong et al., 2000] and 1,4-bis­(4-pyrid­yl)-2,3-di­aza-1,3-butadiene [Ciurtin et al., 2001].

Supra­molecular features  

In the crystal structure of (I), each mol­ecule is involved in four N—H⋯N hydrogen bonds (i.e.: two donor and two acceptor interactions) and inter­acts with two neighboring mol­ecules, resulting in a one-dimensional ladder-like structure along the a axis (Fig. 2). Numerical details of the hydrogen-bonding geometry are tabulated in Table 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

A packing diagram for (I), viewed along the c axis. Dashed lines represent hydrogen bonds. [Symmetry code: (i) x + 1, y, z.]

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N1—H1⋯N4i 0.95 (2) 1.95 (2) 2.8493 (17) 157.9 (19)

Symmetry code: (i) Inline graphic.

As a comparison, the related compound 1,2-bis­[(1H-imidazol-5-yl)methyl­ene]hydrazine (Pinto et al., 2013) is a planar mol­ecule which constitutes corrugated layers parallel to the (101) plane, as a result of both hydrogen bonding and π–π stacking inter­actions with adjacent mol­ecules. In the present case of (I), instead, there are no significant π–π stacking inter­actions.

Synthesis and crystallization  

A methanol solution (10 mL) of imidazole-2-carboxaldehyde (2.48 g, 25.8 mmol) was added to a methanol solution (10 mL) of hydrazine monohydrate (0.64 ml, 12.9 mmol). The mixture was stirred for 3 h and the precipitate was collected by filtration. Single crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction studies were obtained by diffusion of diethyl ether into a DMSO solution of the title compound (I). Yield: 2.21 g (91%).

Refinement  

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2. All the H atoms were located in difference-Fourier maps. For the H atom bounded to atom N1, the atomic coordinates and U iso were refined, giving an N—H distance of 0.95 (2) Å. The C-bound H atoms were subsequently treated as riding atoms in geometrically idealized positions: C—H distances of 0.95 Å with U iso(H) = 1.2U eq(C).

Table 2. Experimental details.

Crystal data
Chemical formula C8H8N6
M r 188.20
Crystal system, space group Monoclinic, P21/n
Temperature (K) 150
a, b, c (Å) 5.0618 (3), 14.6282 (8), 6.1294 (4)
β (°) 106.321 (2)
V3) 435.56 (5)
Z 2
Radiation type Mo Kα
μ (mm−1) 0.10
Crystal size (mm) 0.35 × 0.10 × 0.03
 
Data collection
Diffractometer Bruker D8 VENTURE
Absorption correction Multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2015)
T min, T max 0.702, 0.746
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections 2614, 999, 903
R int 0.014
(sin θ/λ)max−1) 0.650
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.042, 0.117, 1.12
No. of reflections 999
No. of parameters 68
H-atom treatment H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) 0.31, −0.26

Computer programs: APEX3 and SAINT (Bruker, 2015), SHELXS97 and SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008) and SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015).

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989016004497/bg2582sup1.cif

e-72-00556-sup1.cif (91KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989016004497/bg2582Isup2.hkl

e-72-00556-Isup2.hkl (81.6KB, hkl)

Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989016004497/bg2582Isup3.cml

CCDC reference: 1468833

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Acknowledgments

GHL thanks the Instrumentation Center, National Taiwan University, for support of this work.

supplementary crystallographic information

Crystal data

C8H8N6 F(000) = 196
Mr = 188.20 Dx = 1.435 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/n Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 5.0618 (3) Å Cell parameters from 2074 reflections
b = 14.6282 (8) Å θ = 2.8–27.5°
c = 6.1294 (4) Å µ = 0.10 mm1
β = 106.321 (2)° T = 150 K
V = 435.56 (5) Å3 Needle, colourless
Z = 2 0.35 × 0.10 × 0.03 mm

Data collection

Bruker D8 VENTURE diffractometer 903 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
φ and ω scans Rint = 0.014
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2015) θmax = 27.5°, θmin = 2.8°
Tmin = 0.702, Tmax = 0.746 h = −6→6
2614 measured reflections k = −18→19
999 independent reflections l = −7→6

Refinement

Refinement on F2 0 restraints
Least-squares matrix: full Hydrogen site location: mixed
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.042 H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.117 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0528P)2 + 0.2863P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.12 (Δ/σ)max < 0.001
999 reflections Δρmax = 0.31 e Å3
68 parameters Δρmin = −0.26 e Å3

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
N1 −0.1374 (2) 0.62851 (8) 0.4802 (2) 0.0175 (3)
H1 0.055 (5) 0.6193 (14) 0.515 (4) 0.037 (6)*
C2 −0.2801 (3) 0.67725 (10) 0.2944 (2) 0.0204 (4)
H2 −0.2082 0.7044 0.1823 0.025*
C3 −0.5481 (3) 0.67920 (10) 0.3022 (2) 0.0197 (3)
H3 −0.6956 0.7084 0.1937 0.024*
N4 −0.5714 (2) 0.63279 (8) 0.4899 (2) 0.0187 (3)
C5 −0.3193 (3) 0.60313 (10) 0.5944 (2) 0.0162 (3)
C6 −0.2539 (3) 0.55035 (10) 0.8020 (2) 0.0180 (3)
H6 −0.3975 0.5336 0.8659 0.022*
N7 −0.0068 (3) 0.52574 (8) 0.9014 (2) 0.0195 (3)

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
N1 0.0139 (6) 0.0223 (6) 0.0170 (6) 0.0001 (5) 0.0052 (5) 0.0008 (5)
C2 0.0187 (7) 0.0264 (8) 0.0165 (7) 0.0001 (6) 0.0055 (5) 0.0039 (5)
C3 0.0168 (7) 0.0227 (7) 0.0187 (7) 0.0013 (5) 0.0037 (5) 0.0040 (5)
N4 0.0152 (6) 0.0220 (6) 0.0188 (6) 0.0006 (5) 0.0046 (5) 0.0027 (5)
C5 0.0141 (7) 0.0180 (7) 0.0167 (7) −0.0007 (5) 0.0049 (5) −0.0013 (5)
C6 0.0166 (7) 0.0205 (7) 0.0173 (7) −0.0005 (5) 0.0054 (5) 0.0004 (5)
N7 0.0198 (6) 0.0224 (6) 0.0159 (6) 0.0003 (5) 0.0043 (5) 0.0030 (5)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

N1—C5 1.3557 (18) C3—H3 0.9500
N1—C2 1.3656 (18) N4—C5 1.3295 (18)
N1—H1 0.95 (2) C5—C6 1.445 (2)
C2—C3 1.371 (2) C6—N7 1.2795 (19)
C2—H2 0.9500 C6—H6 0.9500
C3—N4 1.3689 (19) N7—N7i 1.409 (2)
C5—N1—C2 107.26 (12) C5—N4—C3 105.60 (12)
C5—N1—H1 130.4 (13) N4—C5—N1 111.18 (13)
C2—N1—H1 122.3 (13) N4—C5—C6 123.37 (13)
N1—C2—C3 106.15 (12) N1—C5—C6 125.46 (13)
N1—C2—H2 126.9 N7—C6—C5 121.43 (13)
C3—C2—H2 126.9 N7—C6—H6 119.3
N4—C3—C2 109.81 (13) C5—C6—H6 119.3
N4—C3—H3 125.1 C6—N7—N7i 111.41 (15)
C2—C3—H3 125.1
C5—N1—C2—C3 −0.35 (16) C2—N1—C5—N4 0.38 (17)
N1—C2—C3—N4 0.21 (17) C2—N1—C5—C6 −179.95 (14)
C2—C3—N4—C5 0.02 (17) N4—C5—C6—N7 −177.58 (13)
C3—N4—C5—N1 −0.25 (16) N1—C5—C6—N7 2.8 (2)
C3—N4—C5—C6 −179.93 (13) C5—C6—N7—N7i −179.35 (14)

Symmetry code: (i) −x, −y+1, −z+2.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
N1—H1···N4ii 0.95 (2) 1.95 (2) 2.8493 (17) 157.9 (19)

Symmetry code: (ii) x+1, y, z.

References

  1. Bacchi, A. & Pelagatti, P. (2016). Chem. Commun. 52, 1327–1337. [DOI] [PubMed]
  2. Bruker (2015). APEX3, SAINT and SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc, Madison , Wisconsin, USA.
  3. Ciurtin, D. M., Dong, Y.-B., Smith, M. D., Barclay, T. & zur Loye, H.-C. (2001). Inorg. Chem. 40, 2825–2834. [DOI] [PubMed]
  4. Desiraju, G. R. (2000). Stimulating Concepts in Chemistry, edited by F. Vogtle, J. F. Stoddart & M. Shibasaki, pp. 293–302. Weinheim: Wiley VCH.
  5. Dong, Y.-B., Smith, M. D., Layland, R. C. & zur Loye, H.-C. (2000). Chem. Mater. 12, 1156–1161.
  6. Kim, S. H. & Lee, S. W. (2008). Inorg. Chim. Acta, 361, 137–144.
  7. Létard, J. F., Guionneau, P., Rabardel, L., Howard, J. A. K., Goeta, A. E., Chasseau, D. & Kahn, O. (1998). Inorg. Chem. 37, 4432–4441. [DOI] [PubMed]
  8. Lindoy, L. F. & Atkinson, I. M. (2000). In Self-assembly in Supramolecular Systems, pp. 8–46. Cambridge: RSC.
  9. Pinto, J., Silva, V. L. M., Silva, A. M. S., Claramunt, R. M., Sanz, D., Torralba, M. C., Torres, M. R., Reviriego, F., Alkorta, I. & Elguero, J. (2013). Magn. Reson. Chem. 51, 203–221. [DOI] [PubMed]
  10. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  11. Sheldrick, G. M. (2015). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8.
  12. Subramanian, S. & Zaworotko, M. J. (1994). Coord. Chem. Rev. 137, 357–401.
  13. Zhou, X.-P., Li, M., Liu, J. & Li, D. (2012). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 67–70. [DOI] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989016004497/bg2582sup1.cif

e-72-00556-sup1.cif (91KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989016004497/bg2582Isup2.hkl

e-72-00556-Isup2.hkl (81.6KB, hkl)

Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989016004497/bg2582Isup3.cml

CCDC reference: 1468833

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES