Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2016 Jul-Aug;31(4):288–290. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000352

Reducing Disparities in Cardiovascular Health: Social Determinants Matter

Laura L Hayman 1, Jane Nelson Worel 2
PMCID: PMC4910516  NIHMSID: NIHMS774476  PMID: 27295043

Mortality from cardiovascular disease (CVD) has decreased substantially in the United States (U.S.) over the past five decades. 1 Advances in both prevention and treatment have been credited for this positive trend. Important to note, however, is that the burden of CVD remains high, particularly in marginalized sub-groups of the population, and the prevalence is projected to increase approximately 10% between 2010 and 2030. 2 Several reasons have been offered for these projections including the aging of the U.S. population and the substantial increases in chronic conditions, particularly obesity. 1 Epidemiological and clinical studies have documented an excess burden of obesity, its comorbidities, and adverse behavioral-lifestyle patterns in sub-groups of the U.S. population including racial/ethnic minorities and those from lower socioeconomic strata. 1 Viewed from a socio-ecological perspective, considerable research attention has focused on factors that operate beyond the individual level to alter life course trajectories that result in excess risk and burden of CVD. Based on accumulated evidence, the American Heart Association (AHA) recently issued a scientific statement that highlights the importance of the social correlates and determinants of both risk and outcomes for CVD. 3

The World Health Organization (WHO) has defined the social determinants of health broadly as “the circumstances in which people are born, grow, live, work and age and the systems put in place to deal with illness.” 4 Consistent with life course socio-ecological perspectives, this WHO definition was operationalized in the AHA statement with evidence indicating social economic position (SEP), race/ethnicity, social support, culture and language, access to care, and residential environment as social determinants of health. 3 Recent research and systematic reviews strongly suggest that socioeconomic conditions early in life contribute to risk for CVD in adulthood, particularly when early-life factors influence the developmental trajectories of conventional risk factors such as blood pressure, lipid levels, body-mass index (BMI) and health behaviors. 5 Harper and colleagues 5 suggest that the interactions among early –life socioeconomic environments and risk factor trajectories influence both the development and maintenance of health behaviors and their “cumulative biological sequelae” as part of a major life-course process linking SEP in early life to CVD in adulthood.

Racial/ethnic differences in the prevalence, treatment and outcomes of CVD have been investigated extensively and well-documented. As summarized by Havranek and colleagues in the AHA statement, 3 numerous factors interact to influence the excess burden of CVD in racial/ethnic minority populations. Points of emphasis that are particularly relevant to health care providers include the concepts of implicit bias and stereotype threat that may be root causes of disparate care. 3 While research has demonstrated that clinicians exhibit minimal explicit or intentional bias in clinical decision-making that influences care provided, implicit (unconscious, attitudinal) bias has been well documented. 68 Several studies have demonstrated that implicit bias may result in lower-quality clinical interactions and communication between clinicians and minority patients. 68 For example, in a study of primary care providers, Blair and colleagues 6 observed implicit race bias predicted differences between black and white patients’ reports of their clinicians’ patient centeredness. Black patients in this study reported less interpersonal treatment and poorer communication reducing comfort and trust in clinicians who were previously categorized as having higher levels of implicit racial bias. 6 Substantial research has focused on patients’ perceptions of discrimination and bias during health care encounters. One comprehensive review indicated that 52% of blacks, 13% of Latinos and 6% of non-Hispanic whites reported biased treatment based on their respective race or ethnicity. 9 While results are not consistent across studies, perception of biased treatment has been associated with self-reports of poorer health status, self care, adherence to treatment regimens, and underutilization of available health services. 3,9 Although less data are available on stereotype threat, the often unconscious fear of being judged negatively according to racial stereotypes, evidence suggests adverse effects on patient-provider communication and patient adherence.1011

Social support and its links with health and illness across the life course of individuals from diverse populations has been investigated extensively. While evidence indicates significant associations between low levels of social support and risk for and outcomes of CVD, lacking are effective interventions designed to increase social support. 3,12 Relatedly, social networks have emerged as an important area of emphasis thought to influence health through social influence on behavior and through the material resources (social capital) available to respective members.13 Of note, as documented in a national survey by Marsden, 14 whites have social networks of greater size and diversity compared with their Latino and black counterparts. Lacking, however, are data on the mechanisms by which social networks influence health and health care for individuals from diverse racial/ethnic populations.

Accumulated data and anecdotal clinical observations point to the importance of language differences and cultural beliefs and practices as important social determinants of health-seeking behaviors and access to and utilization of health care services. Results of several studies point to the promise and potential of community health workers (CHWs) as part of health care teams in reducing these barriers and improving both prevention and control of CVD.1518 Often members of the target population with similar cultural and linguistic practices, CHWs assume numerous roles in facilitating access to health care services, monitoring patient health status, improving patient-provider communication and adherence to treatment regimens. 1518

Taken together and as summarized by Havranek and colleagues, 3 additional research is needed to explicate the specific mechanisms through which these social determinants influence both risk and outcomes for CVD and to guide and inform effective and efficient multi-level interventions designed to attenuate adverse social influences and optimize cardiovascular health for all. Cognizant of the importance of social factors in both prevention and management of CVD, cardiovascular nurses are well-prepared and positioned to add to the existing knowledge base and to advocate for multilevel policies designed to mitigate adverse social influences.

Acknowledgments

Laura L. Hayman acknowledges grant support from the National Institute of Minority Health and Health Disparities (1 P60 MD006912-03)

Contributor Information

Laura L. Hayman, Associate Vice Provost for Research and Graduate Studies, Professor of Nursing, University of Massachusetts Boston.

Jane Nelson Worel, Nurse Practitioner, Phases, Primary HealthCare for Women, Madison, WI.

References

  • 1.Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, et al. Executive Summary: Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2016 Update.: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2016;133:447–454. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Heidenrich PA, Albert NM, Allen LA, et al. Forecasting the impact of heart failure in the United States: a policy statement from the American Heart Association. Circ Heart Failure. 2013;6:606–619. doi: 10.1161/HHF.Ob013e318291329a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Havranek EP, Mujahid MS, Barr DA, et al. Social determinants of risk and outcomes for cardiovascular disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2015;132:873–898. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Marmot M, Fried S, Bell R, Houweling TA, Taylor S. Commission on social determinants of health: closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on social determinants of health. Lancet. 2008;372:1661–1669. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.18.1.341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Harper S, Lynch L, Smith GD. Social determinants and the decline of cardiovascular disease: understanding the links. Annu Rev Public Health. 2011;32:39–69. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031210-101234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Blair IV, Havranek EP, Price DW, et al. Assessment of biases against Latinos and African American among primary care providers and community members. Am J Public Health. 2013;103:92–98. doi: 10.205/AJPH.2012.300812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Green AR, Carney DR, Palin DJ, et al. Implicit bias among physicians and its prediction of thrombolysis decisions for black and white patients. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22:1231–1238. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0258-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sabin J, Nosek BA, Greenwald A, Rivara FP. Physicians’ implicit and explicit attitudes about race by MD race, ethnicity, and gender. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2009;20:896–913. doi: 10.1353/hpu.0.0185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Shavers VL, Fagan P, Jones D, et al. The state of research on racial/ethnic discrimination in the receipt of health care. Am J Publ Health. 2012;102:953–966. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Burgess DJ, Warren J, Phelan S, Dovidio J, van Ryn M. Stereothreat and health disparities: what medical educators and future physicians need to know. Med Care Res Rev. 2010;25(suppl 2):S169–S177. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-1221-4. doi:10:1007/s11606-009-1221-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Havranek EO, Hanratty R, Tate C, et al. The effect of values affirmation on race-discordant patient-provider communication. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172:1662–1667. doi: 10.1001/2013.jamaintermed.258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Stansfeld SA. Social support and social cohesion. In: Marmot M, Wilkinson R, editors. Social Determinants of Health. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2006. pp. 155–174. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lin N. Inequality in social capital. Contemp Sociol. 29:785–795. 200. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Marsden PV. Homogeneity in confiding relations. Soc Networks. 1988;10:57–76. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Brownstein JN, Bone LR, Dennison CR, Hill MN, Kim MT, Levine DM. Community health workers as interventionists in the prevention and control of heart disease and stroke. Am J Prev Med. 2005;29(suppl 1):128–133. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.07.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Allen JK, Dennison-Himmelfarb CR, Szanton SL, et al. Community outreach and cardiovascular health (COACH) trial: a randomized, controlled trial of nurse practitioner/community health worker cardiovascular disease risk reduction in urban community health centers. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2011;4:595–602. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.111.961573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Choi SE, Rush EB. Effect of a short-duration, culturally-tailored, community-based diabetes self-management intervention for Korean immigrants: a pilot study. Diabetes Educ. 2012;38:377–385. doi: 10.1177/014572171244392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Levesque JF, Harris MF, Russell G. Patient-centered access to health care: conceptualizing access at the interface of health systems and populations. Int J Equity Health. 2013;12:18. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-12-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES