Skip to main content
Nature Communications logoLink to Nature Communications
. 2016 Jun 14;7:ncomms11851. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11851

A new type of solar-system material recovered from Ordovician marine limestone

B Schmitz 1,2,a, Q -Z Yin 3, M E Sanborn 3, M Tassinari 1, C E Caplan 2, G R Huss 2
PMCID: PMC4911632  PMID: 27299793

Abstract

From mid-Ordovician ∼470 Myr-old limestone >100 fossil L-chondritic meteorites have been recovered, representing the markedly enhanced flux of meteorites to Earth following the breakup of the L-chondrite parent body. Recently one anomalous meteorite, Österplana 065 (Öst 65), was found in the same beds that yield L chondrites. The cosmic-ray exposure age of Öst 65 shows that it may be a fragment of the impactor that broke up the L-chondrite parent body. Here we show that in a chromium versus oxygen-isotope plot Öst 65 falls outside all fields encompassing the known meteorite types. This may be the first documented example of an ‘extinct' meteorite, that is, a meteorite type that does not fall on Earth today because its parent body has been consumed by collisions. The meteorites found on Earth today apparently do not give a full representation of the kind of bodies in the asteroid belt ∼500 Myr ago.


Inline graphicMeteorites falling on Earth today are believed to represent 100–150 parent bodies. Within 470  Myr ago sediments at a limestone quarry in Sweden, Schmitz et al. have found and identified a new type of meteorite based on chromium and oxygen isotopes sourced from a previously unknown parental body.


The ordinary chondrites are the dominant type of meteorite falling on Earth today, representing about 85% of the total flux. They are divided in three subgroups, H (42% of ordinary chondrite falls), L (47%) and LL (11%), depending on their iron and metal content. In the 1960s, it was realized that the L chondrites show a major peak in K–Ar degassing ages at 500 Myr ago1,2, an age recently better constrained to 470 Myr ago3. These meteorites apparently underwent a massive collisional event at this time, involving the breakup of their parent body. In contrast, the typical degassing age of most meteorite types goes back to the young solar system, that is, >3.5 Gyr ago. In marine limestone that formed on Earth around 470 Myr ago, there is an evidence for an at least two orders of magnitude increase in the flux of L-chondritic meteorites and micrometeorites (for a review, see ref. 4). The prime evidence is the more than 100 fossil L chondrites recovered during the industrial quarrying of Ordovician limestone in southern Sweden4,5. The meteorites are almost completely replaced by secondary minerals, but spinel grains, and often also petrographic textures, are preserved. Mineralogical, chemical, isotopic and petrographic studies have shown that mid-Ordovician fossil extraterrestrial material is indeed of L-chondritic origin4. Recently, one 8-cm-large meteorite was found, containing spinel grains very different from all the other meteorites6. On the basis of 21Ne cosmic-ray exposure ages of its spinel grains this meteorite, Österplana 065, previously referred to as the ‘mysterious object', appears to have been liberated as a meteoroid at the same time as the other fossil meteorites6,7,8. It may thus represent a piece of the impactor that broke up the L-chondrite parent body6. The breakup of this body and the following enhanced flux of extraterrestrial material, including km-sized asteroids, coincide with marked evolutionary changes in Earth's invertebrate life, the so-called Great Ordovician Biodiversification Event9. Unravelling why the L-chondrite parent body broke up at this time, may lead to a better understanding of possible large-scale astronomical perturbations affecting both Earth and the solar system4.

Österplana 065 was preliminarily classified as ‘winonaite-like', based on oxygen isotopic and elemental composition of its spinels and by comparison with a winonaite clast in the Villabeto de la Peña ordinary (L6) chondrite6,10. In order to further clarify the origin of Öst 65 here we apply chromium isotopic analyses of whole-rock samples of Öst 65 plus three fossil L chondrites (Österplana 018, 029 and 032, or informal names Ark 018, Gol 001 and Bot 003, respectively), as well as clast and host material from Villabeto de la Peña. We also perform Cr-isotopic analyses of separated chrome-spinel grains from two recent meteorites, the winonaite NWA 725 and the L6 ordinary chondrite Lundsgard. In addition, we present refined oxygen three-isotopic analyses for the chrome spinels of Öst 65, and new data on the appearances and distribution of relict minerals in Öst 65. We show that Öst 65 has no documented analogue among the known meteorites that have fallen on Earth in recent time. The 54Cr values of Öst 65 are similar to those of ordinary chondrites, whereas oxygen isotopes show its affinity with some rare primitive achondrites.

Results

Isotopic results

The fossil meteorite Öst 65 is shown in Fig. 1, and its stratigraphic position in the Thorsberg quarry, together with previously established 21Ne cosmic-ray exposure ages6,7, is presented in Fig. 2. Our new ɛ54Cr and Δ17O data are compared to similar data for many of the major groups of meteorites known today in Fig. 3. For the detailed results of our isotopic analyses, see Tables 1 and 2. The spinel grains from Lundsgard and NWA 725 yield ɛ54Cr values that are the same as previously analyzed L6 chondrites and winonaites, respectively. The samples of the fossil L chondrites yield ɛ54Cr results in agreement with an ordinary chondrite origin, that is, in the range −0.34 to −0.24. This indicates that whole-rock analyses of fossil meteorites provide reliable Cr-isotopic results. This is in line with previous elemental analyses of whole-rock fossil L chondrites showing that they have retained most of their original chromium11. The Villabeto de la Peña host and clast give ɛ54Cr values confirming the previous classifications based on oxygen isotopes alone10. The two whole-rock samples of Öst 65 yield ɛ54Cr values of −0.26 to −0.23, which are within the uncertainties of previously measured ordinary chondrites12. The new oxygen-isotope analyses confirm previous Δ17O values for Öst 65 spinels just below the terrestrial fractionation line. The data plot with the winonaites, acapulcoites and lodronites, clearly separated from the chromites of the typical L-chondrite fossil meteorites. Although the oxygen isotopes support a relationship to the winonaites (as suggested in ref. 6), acapulcoites or lodronites, the ɛ54Cr results for Öst 65 rule out such a relationship. Our combined ɛ54Cr and Δ17O analyses of Öst 65 suggest that it originated from an asteroid of a kind not represented in our collections of recent meteorites (Fig. 3).

Figure 1. The Österplana 065 fossil meteorite from the Glaskarten 3 bed.

Figure 1

The meteorite is 8 × 6.5 × 2 cm large. It is surrounded by a grey reduction halo, in the otherwise red limestone. Oxygen was consumed when the meteorite weathered on the sea floor. The coin in the image has a diameter of 2.5 cm.

Figure 2. Thorsberg quarry and cosmic-ray exposure ages of fossil meteorites.

Figure 2

(a) The quarried profile in the Thorsberg quarry with the names of individual beds. (b) Cosmic-ray exposure ages for some of the mid-Ordovician fossil meteorites. Meteorite cosmic-ray exposure ages increase with stratigraphic height, in accordance with sedimentation rates as established from conventional biochronology7,8. The data indicate that all the fossil meteorites, including Öst 65, originate from a breakup event that took place about 200 Ka before the lowermost beds in the quarry formed6. The details and the analytical background of the 21Ne exposure ages are discussed in ref. 6. In the figure the Österplana 065 meteorite is represented by its ‘field' name, Gla3 003, at the top of the section studied. Our fossil meteorites obtain official names, approved by the Meteoritical Society, following the convention of naming meteorites after the locality at which they have been found, that is, in this case Österplana. But in order to emphasize that meteorites in different beds fell at different times they also receive an informal ‘field' name. For Öst 65 the name Gla3 003, implies that it is the third meteorite found in the bed Glaskarten 3.

Figure 3. Oxygen and chromium isotopic composition of meteorites.

Figure 3

Comparison of Δ17O versus ɛ54Cr of achondrites, and ordinary chondrites fallen on Earth in recent time with Österplana 065 (Öst 65) and fossil L-chondritic meteorites Österplana 018, 029 and 032 (Öst 18, Öst 29 and Öst 32 in figure). The fields for ordinary chondrites (OC), Mars (SNCs), Earth and earth-likes, Vesta (HEDs), brachinites, ureilites, winonaites (win), acapulcoites (acp)/lodranites/ungrouped achondrites (ung) and a newly identified unique metal-rich chondrite are marked with select representative samples with available data. Symbol colours indicate meteorite type or grouping. Note that the carbonaceous chondrites and affiliated achondrites plot outside the field, with highly positive ɛ54Cr. The ɛ54Cr literature values are from refs 12, 18, 19, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, and Δ17O literature values are from refs 10, 12, 25, 30, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43.

Table 1. Chromium isotopic results for recent and fossil meteorites.*.

Meteorite name & sample ɛ53Cr ɛ54Cr
Lundsgard +0.21±0.04 −0.38±0.10
NWA 725 +0.05±0.04 −0.54±0.08
Öst 65 sample 1 +0.24±0.03 −0.23±0.07
Öst 65 sample 2 +0.23±0.04 −0.26±0.09
Öst 32 +0.21±0.04 −0.32±0.10
Öst 29 +0.19±0.05 −0.34±0.11
Öst 18 +0.31±0.04 −0.24±0.10
Villabeto de la Peña clast +0.06±0.03 −0.52±0.10
Villabeto de la Peña host +0.26±0.04 −0.29±0.11

*Errors for ɛ53Cr and ɛ54Cr values are 2σ SD.

Table 2. Oxygen isotopic results for Öst 65 chrome-spinel grains.*.

Grain and spot 17O/16O 18O/16O
Grain 4, spot 1 0.00038301±0.00000017 0.0020113±0.0000009
Grain 4, spot 2 0.00038305±0.00000020 0.0020110±0.0000009
Grain 5, spot 1 0.00038329±0.00000016 0.0020117±0.0000009
Grain 8, spot 1 0.00038310±0.00000019 0.0020119±0.0000011
Grain 8, spot 2 0.00038317±0.00000021 0.0020118±0.0000010
Grain 9, spot 1 0.00038312±0.00000020 0.0020127±0.0000010
Grain 10, spot 1 0.00038306±0.00000017 0.0020119±0.0000012
     
Weighted mean and 2σ SD 0.00038311±0.00000007 0.0020117±0.0000004
Reduced χ2 1.226 1.178  
Grain and spot δ17O δ18O Δ17O
Grain 4, spot 1 0.33±0.43 3.02±0.46 −1.24±0.50
Grain 4, spot 2 0.44±0.51 2.92±0.46 −1.07±0.57
Grain 5, spot 1 1.06±0.42 3.24±0.44 −0.62±0.47
Grain 8, spot 1 0.57±0.49 3.36±0.46 −1.18±0.55
Grain 8, spot 2 0.75±0.56 3.28±0.51 −0.96±0.62
Grain 9, spot 1 0.62±0.52 3.74±0.52 −1.32±0.59
Grain 10, spot 1 0.47±0.45 3.37±0.60 −1.28±0.55
       
Weighted mean and 2σ SD 0.61±0.18 3.25±0.18 −1.08±0.21
Reduced χ2 1.266 1.178 0.933

*Data are from measurement spots that are free of cracks, inclusions, overlaps onto other phases and so on that could have caused shifts in the oxygen-isotope ratios.

Errors do not include the systematic uncertainty from the deadtime correction (∼±20‰). Including that uncertainty increases the errors on the mean values for δ17O and Δ17O to ±0.27 and ±0.29, respectively. The larger errors are used in Fig. 3. The errors on individual measurements are only minimally affected by the uncertainty in the deadtime.

Mineralogy and petrology

Mineralogical and petrological data support the conclusion that Öst 65 represents a so far unknown type of meteorite. Our data rule out that Öst 65 is a breccia with clasts of, for example, winonaite and ordinary chondrite origin. The relict texture is unbrecciated and no relict chondrule texture is observed. We have dissolved several fragments from different parts of Öst 65, and have not been able to recover one single grain of the type of chromite that is so common in equilibrated ordinary chondrites. Such chromite (>ca. 30 μm) has a narrow element compositional range, making it easy to identify4. Our studies of polished sections show that the type of chrome-spinel grains we used for oxygen isotopic analyses are distributed throughout the meteorite. There are no MgAl spinels (>5 μm) in Öst 65. The only type of inclusion found in the chrome spinels from Öst 65 has a Ti- and Cr-rich composition (similar to olkhonskite). These inclusions are quite common in the spinels of Öst 65 (Fig. 4a), but no silicate inclusions have been found although searched extensively. The chrome-spinel grains are sometimes associated with 10–30 μm large rutile grains (Fig. 4b). To our knowledge there is no known meteorite with the chrome-spinel–rutile assemblage that we observe in Öst 65.

Figure 4. Back-scattered electron images of mineral grains from Österplana 065.

Figure 4

(a) Chrome-spinel grain with inclusion of a TiCr-mineral, possibly olkhonskite (TiO2=56 wt%, Cr2O3=30 wt%, FeO=9 wt%). (b) Rutile and chrome spinel in polished section of Öst 65. (c) Chrome-spinel grain with apparent shock deformation lamellae. Scale bars, 50 μm.

The majority of the chrome-spinel grains in Öst 65 show abundant planar deformation features (Fig. 4c), something not observed in the many fossil L chondrites. The planar features appear similar to shock lamellae in chromites from shock melt veins in recent meteorites13. The Öst 65 spinels are also heavily fractured (Fig. 4a,c), which provides independent evidence for severe shock. Chromites of recently fallen L chondrites show increasing levels of fracturing with increasing shock stage14.

Discussion

The meteorite Öst 65 accompanies >100 L chondrites recovered in the sediments of the Swedish quarry. Although single random meteorites are possible, one has to consider that Öst 65 represents on the order of one per cent of the meteorites that have been found on the mid-Ordovician sea floor. This indicates that Öst 65 may represent one of the dominant types of meteorites arriving on Earth 470 Myr ago. Although we cannot rule out that a meteorite similar to Öst 65 may eventually be found among meteorites falling on Earth today, we can be quite certain that the Öst 65 type does not represent one per cent of the 52,600 classified recent meteorites. At the most there could be a few overlooked specimens.

The discovery in the Ordovician record of a meteorite type that is apparently not falling on the Earth today has important implications. For example, it is possible that the asteroid that produced Öst 65 no longer exists, and there is no source for such meteorites today. The asteroid belt has been evolving through collisions over the history of the solar system, and many of the original asteroids have undoubtedly been destroyed. The record of fossil meteorites on Earth (or on other planetary bodies) provides the only evidence for their former existence and the only way to investigate the collisional evolution of the solar system. The diversity of meteorite parent bodies even relatively late in solar-system history, ∼500 Myr ago, may have been significantly greater than today. We know, for example, that remnants of Earth building blocks are not present in our meteorite collections. Such meteorites are extinct now but clearly built the Earth in the distant past.

The cosmic-ray exposure age of Öst 65 is ∼1 Myr and is within the range of those of the fossil L chondrites (Fig. 2)6,7,8. This associates Öst 65 with the breakup of the L-chondrite parent body. The high level of shock metamorphism in the chrome-spinel grains (Fig. 4c) is consistent with the Öst 65 parent body having experienced a major collision. It is possible that a collision between the L-chondrite parent body and the Öst 65 parent body resulted in almost complete destruction of the Öst 65 parent asteroid while only disrupting the L-chondrite parent body into several smaller bodies and debris. These smaller bodies continue to feed meteorites, but there is nothing left to provide Öst 65 meteorites to Earth today.

We do not know whether the Öst 65 parent body was one of the original asteroids or already a fragment of a larger object. Iron meteorites come from parent bodies that experienced melting and differentiation that separated the Fe–Ni metal from the silicate components. Trace-element data indicate that iron meteorites may originate from up to 60 different parent bodies15. With a few potential exceptions, we have not been able to identify the silicate fractions that accompanied the Fe–Ni metal in the original parent bodies. The silicates were probably stripped from tougher iron cores of the asteroids early in solar-system history. The iron cores of these parent bodies were much more resistant to collisional degradation, whereas the outer silicate parts have been consumed over time in this process16. Because Öst 65 does not exhibit chondrite texture and has other characteristics that do not match most chondrites, the Öst 65 parent body might represent some of this missing silicate. Winonaite meteorites have very similar oxygen-isotope compositions to the silicate inclusions in IAB and IIICD iron meteorites, implying that they may have originated on the same parent asteroid15,17. The ‘forensic' power of paired Δ17O-ɛ54Cr isotope systematics18,19 could be applied to silicate and oxide inclusions of many types of iron meteorites in order to identify their genetic link with other planetary materials. Studies of fossil meteorites in the Earth sedimentary record may identify other classes of ‘extinct' meteorites, some of which could be linked to known classes of iron meteorites.

The Öst 65 meteorite is significant because it demonstrates that ∼500 Myr ago we may have had different meteorites falling to Earth than what we see today. Some may be extinct, whereas others, such as the L chondrites, still fall on Earth. Apparently there is potential to reconstruct important aspects of solar-system history by looking down in Earth's sediments, in addition to looking up at the skies4.

Methods

Chromium isotopic analysis

Aliquots for Cr-isotopic composition measurements were prepared using bulk material for seven of the samples: Öst 65-1, Öst 65-2, Öst 18, Öst 29 and Öst 32, a winonaite clast fraction from Villalbeto de la Peña and Villalbeto de la Peña L-chondrite host matrix. For the Villalbeto de la Peña clast, the clast fraction was visually inspected for adhered matrix material and any visible matrix was removed by hand. Bulk powders were generated for each sample by crushing a fusion crust-free piece using an agate mortar and pestle. For two of the samples, Lundsgard and NWA 725, Cr-isotopic composition measurements were made using separated chromite grains instead of bulk powders. The bulk powders were homogenized and an aliquot of the powder (30–50 mg) was placed into a PTFE Parr bomb capsule with a 2:1 concentrated HF-HNO3 acid solution. For Lundsgard and NWA 725 the chromite grains were placed directly into their respective PTFE capsules with the 2:1 HF-HNO3 acid solution. The capsules were sealed in stainless steel jackets and heated in an oven for 96 h at 190 °C to ensure complete dissolution of all refractory phases. After dissolution, the sample solutions were dried down and treated with concentrated HNO3 and 6 N HCl to eliminate fluorides generated during the dissolution processes.

Chromium was removed from the sample matrix utilizing a 3-column chemistry procedure described in ref. 20. High-precision isotope ratios were measured in the purified Cr fractions using a Thermo Triton Plus thermal ionization mass spectrometer at the University of California at Davis. The Cr fractions were loaded onto outgassed tungsten filaments after being mixed with an Al-boric acid-silica gel activator solution. Each filament was loaded with 3 μg of Cr and four filaments were loaded for each sample for a total load of 12 μg. Each four filament set was bracketed with filaments loaded with the NIST SRM 979 Cr standard. The signal intensity for each filament was set to 10 V (±15%) for 52Cr with 1011Ω resistors. Each filament analysis consisted of 1,200 ratios with 8 s integrations times. A gain calibration was made at the beginning of each filament, and the baseline was measured and the amplifiers were rotated between each block of 25 ratios. The mass fractionation was corrected using an exponential law and a 50Cr/52Cr ratio of 0.051859 (ref. 21). The 53Cr/52Cr and 54Cr/52Cr ratios are expressed in ɛ-notation (that is, parts per 10,000 deviation from the NIST SRM 979 Cr standard).

Oxygen isotopic analysis

Individual chromite grains, 50–100 μm in diameter, separated from Öst 65, were mounted in resin in 0.25-inch-diameter stainless steel bullets. Somewhat larger grains of Stillwater chromite standard were mounted in similar bullets. All grains were ground and polished to give a flat cross section at least 50 μm across. The grains were imaged with secondary electrons and measurement spots were selected to avoid cracks, surface imperfections, inclusions and so on. The spots were marked using the scanning electron microscope so that the spots could be seen by scanning ion imaging to accurately position the beam for measurement.

Oxygen-isotope compositions were measured using the University of Hawai‘i Cameca ims-1280 ion microprobe. The detailed methodology is provided in ref. 22. Here, we provide details specific for these measurements. A 1 nA Cs+ primary ion beam, focused to ∼10 μm, with a total impact energy of 20 keV was used. Spots were presputtered for 60 s using a 5-μm raster, after which the raster was reduced to 3 μm for measurement. Masses 16O, 17O and 18O were measured simultaneously in multicollection mode. 16O and 18O were measured by multicollector Faraday cups with low-mass resolving power (MRP ∼2,000), while 17O was measured using the axial monocollector electron multiplier with MRP ∼5,600, sufficient to separate the 16OH interference. The relatively high 17O count rate produces a loss in gain due to aging of the first dynode of the electron multipler. To minimize this effect, the 17O signal was measured for only 4 s in each cycle, after which the beam was deflected into a monocollector Faraday cup for 10 s (procedure originally proposed by Kita et al.23). Signals for 16O and 17O collected during the 4-s interval were used to determine the 17O/16O ratio and the 16O and 18O signals collected during the 10-s interval were used to determine the 18O/16O ratio. Each measurement consisted of 30 cycles.

Measured data were corrected for detector background and deadtime (electron multiplier). The background corrections for the Faraday cups were made using a smoothed fit to the backgrounds measured during presputtering. A tail correction was made for the 16OH interference. The contribution of the 16OH tail at mass 17O was estimated from measurement of the low-mass tail of the 17O peak to be ∼6 × 10-6 of the 16OH interference. The height of the 16OH interference was measured at the end of each measurement. Even with our protocol to minimize changes in the gain of the electron multiplier, the gain did change with time. We checked the pulse-height distribution at the beginning of each day and set the gain to our ‘standard' condition. We did not check the gain again during the day, as we have learned that the act of checking the multiplier gain introduces a transient instability in the multiplier gain that compromises the data. The gain of the monocollector electron multiplier during the day was monitored by measuring the Stillwater chromite standard for five-six measurements at the beginning of each day, after five-six measurements of the unknown, and at the end of the day. The Stillwater measurements permitted us to model and account for the gain drift in the multiplier during each measurement day.

The uncertainties for the individual measurement data reported in Table 2 include the counting-statistical uncertainties from the individual measurements, the standard deviation of the standard measurements (including uncertainties in the drift correction in the case of 17O), and the uncertainties in the background and tail corrections. The mean values for Öst 65 are the error-weighted means and the standard errors for the set of measurements. The uncertainties do not include a systematic uncertainty associated with the deadtime correction for 17O. The deadtime of 30 ns has an uncertainty of ±1 nanosecond, which results in an uncertainty on δ17O and Δ17O of 0.2‰. When combined with the statistical errors for individual δ17O and Δ17O measurements, this uncertainty makes little difference. But this error cannot be incorporated into the calculation of the weighted mean and standard error, because it is a systematic error that is not reduced by making more measurements. It must be applied after the mean values and standard errors are calculated. When combined quadratically with the standard errors on the mean values, the total uncertainty for δ17O becomes ±0.27‰ and for Δ17O becomes ±0.29‰.

Data availability

The authors declare that data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.

Additional information

How to cite this article: Schmitz, B. et al. A new type of solar-system material recovered from Ordovician marine limestone. Nat. Commun. 7:11851 doi: 10.1038/ncomms11851 (2016).

Acknowledgments

We thank quarry owners Göran, Sören and Stig Thor for enduring support with the meteorite search; K. Deppert and P. Eriksson for support at Lund University; R. Weihard for steadfast support in Lidköping; A. Cronholm and F. Terfelt for technical assistance; and L. Ferrière, P. Heck, J. Holstein, U. Kolitsch, M. Meier, S. Rout and D. Topa for discussions. Two anonymous referees and D. Lauretta provided helpful comments. B.S. is funded by a European Research Council-Advanced Grant (213000). Q.-Z.Y. thanks K. Ziegler for providing materials from the Villalbeto de la Peña meteorite, and acknowledges NASA (NNX14AM62G) and the UC Office of the President (UC Lab Fees Award ID# 12-LR-237921) for partial support of this work. G.R.H. was supported by NASA (NNX14AI19G). This is Hawai'i Institute of Geophysics and Planetology Publication #2188 and School of Ocean and Earth Science and Technology Publication #9612.

Footnotes

Author contributions All authors contributed equally to the study.

References

  1. Anders E. Origin, age and composition of meteorites. Space Sci. Rev. 3, 583–714 (1964). [Google Scholar]
  2. Keil K., Haack H. & Scott E. R. D. Catastrophic fragmentation of asteroids: evidence from meteorites. Planet. Space Sci. 42, 1109–1122 (1995). [Google Scholar]
  3. Korochantseva E. V. et al. L-chondrite asteroid breakup tied to Ordovician meteorite shower by multiple isochron 40Ar–39Ar dating. Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 42, 113–130 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  4. Schmitz B. Extraterrestrial spinels and the astronomical perspective on Earth's geological record and evolution of life. Chem. Erde. 73, 117–145 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  5. Schmitz B., Tassinari M. & Peucker-Ehrenbrink B. A rain of ordinary chondritic meteorites in the early Ordovician. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 194, 1–15 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  6. Schmitz B. et al. A fossil winonaite-like meteorite in Ordovician limestone: a piece of the impactor that broke up the L-chondrite parent body? Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 400, 145–152 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  7. Heck P. R., Schmitz B., Baur H., Halliday A. N. & Wieler R. Fast delivery of meteorites to Earth after a major asteroid collision. Nature 430, 323–325 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Heck P. R., Schmitz B., Baur H. & Wieler R. Noble gases in fossil micrometeorites and meteorites from 470 Myr old sediments from southern Sweden and new evidence for the L-chondrite parent body breakup event. Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 43, 517–528 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  9. Schmitz B. et al. Asteroid breakup linked to mid-Ordovician biodiversification event. Nat. Geosci. 1, 49–53 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  10. Bischoff A. et al. Reclassification of Villalbeto de la Peña—occurrence of a winonaite-related fragment in a hydrothermally metamorphosed L-chondritic breccia. Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 48, 628–640 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  11. Schmitz B. et al. Determining the impactor of the Ordovician Lockne crater: oxygen and neon isotopes in chromite versus sedimentary PGE signatures. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 306, 149–155 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  12. Jenniskens P. et al. Fall, recovery, and characterization of the Novato L6 chondrite breccia. Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 49, 1388–1425 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  13. Chen M., Shu J., Xie X. & Mao H. K. Natural CaTi2O4-structured FeCr2O4 polymorph in the Suizhou meteorite and its significance in mantle mineralogy. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 67, 3937–3942 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  14. Alwmark C. et al. A 3-D study of mineral inclusions in chromites from ordinary chondrites using synchrotron microtomography—method and applications. Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 46, 1071–1081 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  15. Goldstein J. I., Scott E. R. D. & Chabot N. L. Iron meteorites: crystallization, thermal history, parent bodies, and origin. Chem. Erde 69, 293–325 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  16. Burbine T. H., Meibom A. & Binzel R. P. Mantle material in the main belt: battered to bits? Meteoritics 31, 607–620 (1996). [Google Scholar]
  17. Benedix G. K., McCoy T. J., Keil K. & Love G. A petrologic study of the IAB iron meteorites: constraints on the formation of the IAB-winonaite parent body. Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 35, 1127–1141 (2000). [Google Scholar]
  18. Sanborn M. E., Yin Q.-Z. & Irving A. J. in 45th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, The Woodlands, TX, USA. Abstract #2032 (2014).
  19. Sanborn M. E. & Yin Q.-Z. in 45th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, The Woodlands, TX, USA. Abstract #2018 (2014).
  20. Yamakawa A., Yamashita K., Makishima A. & Nakamura E. Chemical separation and mass spectrometry of Cr, Fe, Ni, Zn, and Cu in terrestrial and extraterrestrial materials using thermal ionization mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 81, 9787–9794 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Shields W. R., Murphy T. J., Catanzaro E. J. & Garner E. L. Absolute isotopic abundance ratios and the atomic weight of a reference sample of chromium. J. Res. Natl Bur. Stand. 70A, 193–197 (1966). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Makide K. et al. Oxygen- and magnesium-isotope compositions of calcium–aluminum-rich inclusions from CR2 carbonaceous chondrites. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 73, 5018–5050 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  23. Kita N. T., Ushikubo T., Fu B., Spicuzza M. J. & Valley J. W. in 38th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, League City, TX, USA. Abstract #1338 (2007).
  24. Yamakawa A., Yamashita K., Makishima A. & Nakamura E. Chromium isotope systematics of achondrites: chronology and isotopic heterogeneity of the inner solar system bodies. ApJ 720, 150–154 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  25. Benedix G. K. et al. in 45th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, The Woodlands, TX, USA. Abstract #1650 (2014).
  26. Shukolyukov A. & Lugmair G. W. in 37th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, League City, TX, USA. Abstract #1478 (2006).
  27. Ueda T., Yamashita K. & Kita N. Chromium isotopic study of ureilites. Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 41, A176 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  28. Sanborn M. E. et al. Re-evaluation of anomalous metal-rich lodranite Northwest Africa 468 based on combined chromium and oxygen isotopes. Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 49, A352 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  29. Sanborn M. E., Yin Q.-Z., Zipfel J. & Palme H. Investigating the genetic relationship between NWA 5492 and GRO 95551 using high-precision chromium isotopes. Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 50, A5159 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  30. Popova O. P. et al. Chelyabinsk airburst, damage assessment, meteorite recovery, and characterization. Science 342, 1069–1073 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Trinquier A., Birck J.-L. & Allegre C. Widespread 54Cr heterogeneity in the inner solar system. ApJ 655, 1179–1185 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  32. Sanborn M. E. et al. Chromium isotopic studies of ungrouped achondrites NWA 7325, NWA 2976, and NWA 6704. Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 48, A5220 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  33. Sanborn M. E. & Yin Q.-Z. in 46th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, The Woodlands, TX, USA. Abstract #2241 (2015).
  34. Clayton R. N. & Mayeda T. K. Oxygen isotope studies of achondrites. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 60, 1999–2017 (1996). [Google Scholar]
  35. Clayton R. N., Mayeda T. K. & Rubin A. E. Oxygen isotopic compositions of enstatite chondrites and aubrites. J. Geophys. Res. 89, C245–C249 (1984). [Google Scholar]
  36. Clayton R. N., Mayeda T. K., Goswami J. N. & Olsen E. J. Oxygen isotope studies of ordinary chondrites. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 55, 2317–2337 (1991). [Google Scholar]
  37. Rubin A. E., Kallemeyn G. W. & Wasson J. T. A AB-complex iron meteorite containing low-Ca clinopyroxene: northwest Africa 468 and its relationship to lodranites and formation by impact melting. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 66, 3657–3671 (2002). [Google Scholar]
  38. Scott E. R. D., Greenwood R. C., Franchi I. A. & Sanders I. S. Oxygen isotopic constraints on the origin and parent bodies of eucrites, diogenites, and howardites. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 73, 5835–5853 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  39. Irving A. J. et al. in 45th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, The Woodlands, TX, USA. Abstract #2465 (2014).
  40. Weisberg M. K. et al. Petrology and oxygen isotopes of NWA 5492, a new metal-rich chondrite. Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 47, 363–373 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  41. Day J. M. D. et al. Origin of felsic achondrites Graves Nunataks 06128 and 06129, and ultramafic brachinites and brachinite-like achondrites by partial melting of volatile-rich primitive parent bodies. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 81, 94–128 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  42. Heck P. R. et al. A single asteroidal source for extraterrestrial Ordovician chromite grains from Sweden and China: high-precision oxygen three-isotope SIMS analysis. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 74, 497–509 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  43. Greenwood R. C., Franchi I. A., Gibson J. M. & Benedix G. K. Oxygen isotope variation in primitive achondrites: the influence of primordial, asteroidal, and terrestrial processes. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 94, 146–163 (2012). [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The authors declare that data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.


Articles from Nature Communications are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES