Abstract
Purpose
A variety of elastographic techniques have been developed to facilitate the non-invasive assessment of tissue properties. The goal of the study was to examine the influence of gender, age, BMI, alcohol consumption, and smoking in healthy volunteers.
Methods
Of the 263 participants who met all the study inclusion criteria, 234 had successful measurements. The examination was performed with the Siemens Acuson S3000 (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany), using the 6C1 curved array transducer with the virtual touch tissue quantification (VTQ) method.
Results
The values determined with the curved array in the head of the pancreas were 1.44 ± 0.39 m/s for women and 1.19 ± 0.29 m/s for men; in the body, the results were 1.49 ± 0.37 m/s for women and 1.26 ± 0.30 m/s for men; in the tail, the corresponding values were 1.29 ± 0.36 m/s for women and 1.05 ± 0.30 m/s for men. Comparison of gender showed that men have significantly lower mean values than women. There were significantly higher values in all parts of the organ with the increasing age of the participants (p < 0.0001). For BMI, there was a significant correlation with the values only when considering the BMI in continuous form. Alcohol consumption and smoking did not have any significant effects.
Conclusions
ARFI-VTQ is qualified for use on pancreatic tissue. Further studies are required to examine the influence of other factors in larger populations.
Keywords: Pancreas, ARFI, VTQ, Influencing factors, Standard values, p-SWE
The incidence of pancreatic disease, such as cancer, cystic lesions, and acute and chronic pancreatitis, is rising [1–3]. Early diagnosis of these diseases is extremely important, especially in the case of pancreatic cancer [4]. Computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), positron emission tomography (PET), PET-CT, and transabdominal ultrasound scanning (TUS) are currently available imaging techniques for diagnostic purposes. Various elastographic procedures have also been available for several years [5].
Elastographic procedures allow us to determine the stiffness of tissues. At the present time, the available techniques are strain elastography, which demonstrates the tissue elasticity by external compression, and point shear wave elastography (p-SWE), single shot (VTIQ), 2D-SWE, and real-time (SSI technology). A recent study shows that the various elastography methods seem to be comparable [6]. Elastographic methods have been used most extensively to investigate diffuse liver disease, and breast and thyroid tissues [6–12], while there are only limited data on transabdominal examination of the pancreas. The findings of earlier transabdominal elastographic studies to detect acute or chronic pancreatitis are still conflicting [13–15]. More recent investigations to determine the degree of pancreatic fibrosis show promising results, however, also in the assessment of patients with cystic fibrosis [16, 17]. Two recent studies to detect solid pancreatic masses found clearly higher shear wave velocity in solid tumors of the pancreas than in the surrounding parenchymal tissue [18, 19]. The value of pancreatic elastography in the assessment of cystic space-occupying lesions cannot be determined conclusively at the present time, as all the data come from just one research team [20]. The great value of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) elastography in the investigation of the pancreas has been shown in recent studies [21]. Compared with transabdominal elastographic procedures, however, EUS procedures are more invasive and technically more demanding [19].
Systematic investigations of the influence of factors such as gender, age, body mass index (BMI), anatomical conditions, transducer frequency, respiration, and nutritional status on pancreatic measurements are somewhat limited [22–24]. Arda et al. found no differences in the pancreas due to gender in 127 subjects [24]. Gallotti et al. measured higher shear wave velocities in the head of the pancreas than in the body [22]. In their recent study on 210 healthy volunteers, Xie et al. did not find any effects of age, gender, BMI, organ size, or waist circumference [15]. Various other studies have examined healthy volunteers using the virtual touch tissue quantification (VTQ) technology from Siemens (Acuson S2000, Siemens Medical Solutions, Mountain View, CA, USA) [13, 22]. Yashima et al. studied 52 healthy volunteers and determined values of 1.23 ± 0.34, 1.30 ± 0.34, and 1.24 ± 0.5 m/s for the head, body, and tail of the pancreas, respectively [13]. Mateen et al. published a normal value of 1.27 ± 0.29 m/s for pancreatic tissue, likewise in 52 healthy volunteers, although they made no distinction between the head, body, and tail regions [14]. Gallotti et al. examined 35 patients and obtained a mean value of 1.40 m/s, but they also did not distinguish the different anatomical regions of the pancreas [22].
The aim of our study was therefore to investigate the influence of age, gender, BMI, alcohol consumption, and smoking on the shear wave velocity of the pancreas in healthy volunteers.
Materials and methods
Volunteers
The study was performed in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration and approved by the local ethics committee [25]. All subjects gave their written consent to participate in the study. We enrolled 324 healthy volunteers between March and August 2013. Healthy volunteers were defined as follows: persons without known pre-existing conditions, no drug revenues, physical and mental health at the time of the investigation. The medical history taken from each subject included previous illnesses, medications, and drug and alcohol consumption. Subjects who admitted to drinking alcohol more than three times a week were allocated to the positive control group in this study. The random sample included only those subjects in whom we were able to obtain elastographic measurements for all three regions of the pancreas—head, body, and tail. Of the 324 healthy volunteers enrolled, we excluded 90 from the analysis for the following reasons: incomplete measurements, medication, drug consumption, chronic disease, BMI >30 kg/m2, and a history of cancer.
Interview and questionnaire
Each interview was conducted by a trained interviewer. The standardized questionnaire included personal data (i.e., date of birth, gender, current weight, body size), health and social behavior (i.e., alcohol consumption), and other risk factors for medical diseases (i.e., smoking) and previous medical records of participants. For estimation of alcohol consumption and smoke behavior, each subject was asked if they drink alcohol and if they smoke.
Elastography
Measurements were made with a Siemens Acuson S3000 (Siemens Medical Solutions, Mountain View, CA, USA) and a 6C1 curved array transducer for VTQ (Fig. 1). To begin with, the pancreas was demonstrated in B-mode imaging. The echogenicity of the pancreas was then compared with the kidney/liver parenchyma. A diagnosis of pancreatic lipomatosis was made if the pancreas was clearly more echogenic than the liver parenchyma [26]. Patients fasted for 3 h prior to the examinations, which were then carried out with the patient lying down. In each case, we took four measurements in each of the head, body, and tail regions. Figure 2 shows the procedure for positioning the region of interest (ROI). So that we could obtain measurements in mid-respiration, the subject was instructed to breathe in deeply, breathe out, and then breathe normally, until told to stop breathing while the measurements were taken. This procedure prevented movement artifacts, as far as possible. We excluded subjects in whom we could not get clear views of the head, body, and tail of the pancreas, as well as all those with fewer than four measurements per region. The shear wave velocities for each measurement position were recorded in m/s.
Reliability measurements
As nine examiners were involved in the study, they performed reliability measurements on phantoms to determine the inter-observer reproducibility. We selected four phantoms—a pig’s liver, pig’s muscle, and two balls (one of a hard and one of a soft material consistency)—and encased them in agarose gel. This allowed us to determine the intra- and inter-rater reliability.
Statistical analyses
SPSS statistics software (IBM SPSS Statistics, Version 21) was used for the analyses. Mean, standard deviation (STD), median, and range were determined for continuous variables. Continuous variables of two or more independent groups were compared with Student’s t test or one-way ANOVA. Correlation between parameters were expressed with Pearson’s correlation coefficients. Parameters that were significant in univariate analysis (age, gender, BMI) were included in multivariate analysis using linear regression. The intra- and inter-rater reliability of measurements obtained with the curved array on the phantoms was checked with the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC, two-factorial with the inclusion of phantom and mass effects). With this procedure, agreement is considered excellent with a figure of 0.75 or more, good with 0.60–0.74, moderate with 0.40–0.59, and poor with results of less than 0.40. We used two-tailed statistical tests to demonstrate all relationships and differences in the mean.
Results
The sample consisted of 148 women (63.3%) and 86 men (36.8%). The mean age of the men was 31.5 ± 13.7 years, and that of the women 36.3 ± 15.5 years; the mean BMI was 22.5 ± 2.4 kg/m2. Overall, 9.9% of participants (n = 23) were smokers, while 11.1% of these healthy volunteers (n = 26) admitted that they drank alcohol more than three times a week.
The shear wave velocity obtained for the pancreas with the 6C1 curved array transducer was 1.35 ± 0.37 m/s for the head, 1.41 ± 0.36 m/s for the body, and 1.20 ± 0.36 m/s for the tail (Table 1). Independent of the location, the following values were determined: 1.31 ± 0.29 m/s (range 0.74–2.29). The values of the individual segments correlate significantly with each other ((head vs. body: p ≤ 0.0001 (r = 0.49120); head vs. tail: <0.0001 (r = 0.35442); body vs. tail: <0.0001 (r = 0.44167)). Dividing the subjects into three age groups (<25, 25–50, >50 years), however, the values for all three pancreatic regions differ significantly between the age groups. Measured values rose with increasing age (Table 2). In all three organ segments, the mean values for men were lower than those for women (p < 0.0001) (Table 3). In order to determine the effects of BMI on the measurements, we divided the healthy volunteers into two groups (BMI < 25 and BMI > 25). Comparing the results, it became apparent that the values does not differ between the two groups for all segments (head p = 0.4190; body p = 0.1806; tail p = 0.2952). There were no significant differences of the means between smokers (n = 23) and non-smokers (n = 211) (head: p = 0.4105; body: p = 0.4561; tail: p = 0.2624). In participants with a higher alcohol consumption (n = 26), there was a tendency toward higher values but the differences were not significant (head: p = 0.3690; body: p = 0.2131; tail: p = 0.1120).
Table 1.
Mean | 95% CI | STD | Med | Min | Max | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LL | UL | ||||||
Head | 1.35 | 1.30 | 1.39 | 0.37 | 1.28 | 0.70 | 2.73 |
Body | 1.41 | 1.36 | 1.45 | 0.36 | 1.34 | 0.68 | 2.90 |
Tail | 1.20 | 1.16 | 1.25 | 0.36 | 1.12 | 0.64 | 2.61 |
STD, standard deviation; Med, median; Min, minimum; Max, maximum; LL, lower limit; UL, upper limit; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval
Table 2.
Mean ± STD (range) | p value | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Age < 25 (n = 84) |
Age 25–50 (n = 105) |
Age > 50 (n = 45) |
||
Head | 1.27 ± 0.31 (0.76–2.33) |
1.33 ± 0.38 (0.70–2.49) |
1.53 ± 0.39 (0.80–2.73) |
0.0004 |
Body | 1.32 ± 0.33 (0.68–2.82) |
1.40 ± 0.33 (0.84–2.58) |
1.59 ± 0.43 (0.98–2.90) |
0.0002 |
Tail | 1.10 ± 0.29 (0.70–2.12) |
1.16 ± 0.32 (0.64–2.35) |
1.49 ± 0.41 (0.86–2.61) |
<0.0001 |
Table 3.
MW | STD | min | max | t | p | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Head | ||||||
Women | 1.44 | 0.39 | 0.86 | 2.73 | 5.024 | <0.000 |
Men | 1.19 | 0.29 | 0.70 | 2.17 | ||
Body | ||||||
Women | 1.49 | 0.37 | 0.85 | 2.90 | 5.375 | <0.000 |
Men | 1.26 | 0.30 | 0.68 | 2.82 | ||
Tail | ||||||
Women | 1.29 | 0.36 | 0.73 | 2.61 | 5.303 | <0.000 |
Men | 1.05 | 0.30 | 0.64 | 2.16 |
M, mean; STD, standard deviation; min, minimum; max, maximum
The results of the multivariate analysis show for the areas head and body a significant association between shear wave velocity and age (continuous), BMI (continuous), and gender. For the section tail, the same result could be shown like for the other two sections, only BMI had no influence on the shear wave values (Table 4).
Table 4.
Factor | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Estimate | p | Estimate | p | 95% confidence interval | |
Head | |||||
Gender | −0.24741 | <0.0001 | −0.17241 | 0.0005 | −0.26782 to −0.07699 |
BMI | −0.02510 | 0.0131 | 0.00773 | 0.0011 | −0.05408 to −0.01363 |
Age | 0.000672 | <0.0001 | −0.03386 | <0.0001 | 0.00455 to 0.01091 |
Body | |||||
Gender | −0.23797 | <0.0001 | −0.15052 | 0.0015 | −0.24268 to −0.05836 |
BMI | −0.03517 | 0.0003 | −0.04491 | <0.0001 | −0.06444 to −0.02537 |
Age | 0.00600 | 0.0001 | 0.00772 | <0.0001 | 0.00465 – 0.01079 |
Tail | |||||
Gender | −0.23548 | <0.0001 | −0.17683 | 0.0001 | −0.26612 to −0.08754 |
BMI | 0.00353 | 0.7217 | −0.00989 | 0.3042 | −0.02882 to 0.00903 |
Age | 0.01031 | <0.0001 | 0.00999 | <0.0001 | 0.00707 to 0.01296 |
The ICCs for the intra-rater reliability of the individual examiners ranged from 0.857 to 0.979, indicating excellent reliability (Table 5). The inter-rater reliability was also excellent, with figures of 0.931 in round 1 and 0.898 in round 2 (Table 6).
Table 5.
Examiner | ICC | 95% CI | |
---|---|---|---|
LL | UL | ||
1 | 0.943 | 0.842 | 0.986 |
2 | 0.885 | 0.701 | 0.970 |
3 | 0.964 | 0.897 | 0.991 |
4 | 0.979 | 0.938 | 0.995 |
5 | 0.979 | 0.940 | 0.995 |
6 | 0.920 | 0.783 | 0.979 |
7 | 0.882 | 0.693 | 0.969 |
8 | 0.857 | 0.638 | 0.962 |
9 | 0.860 | 0.643 | 0.963 |
Transducer mounted on a tripod | 0.982 | 0.948 | 0.996 |
ICC, intra-class correlation; CI, confidence interval; LL, lower limit; UL, upper limit
Table 6.
ICC | 95% CI | ||
---|---|---|---|
LL | UL | ||
Round 1 | 0.931 | 0.848 | 0.981 |
Round 2 | 0.898 | 0.751 | 0.982 |
ICC, intra-class correlation; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; LL, lower limit; UL, upper limit
Discussion
To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the largest one investigating the factors affecting measurements of the pancreas with a Siemens Acuson S3000. Our data confirm earlier results obtained using the VTQ technique with an Acuson S2000. Our findings also confirm data from Yashima and Gallotti, which showed different shear wave velocities for the head, body, and tail of the pancreas [13, 22]. The reason for the different measurements obtained from these anatomical regions may be different histological properties or differences in the measurement positions imposed by the anatomy when determining shear wave velocity. One possible explanation is the different angles of the ROIs when measuring the head and tail, as there is deviation from the vertical in the measurements [27]. Another explanation might be the deeper location resulting in lower measurements from the head and tail in comparison with the body of the pancreas.
Our results show a significant difference between the genders. In a further study from our research group, a gender difference could also be shown on the liver [28]. A deep dependence of the shear wave velocity was detected by various working groups [28, 29]. One possible explanation for the different values could be the different organ position in men and women. Due to a thicker muscle layer, the organ in males is usually farther from the transducer away than in women. The difference between the measurement results could therefore be due to measuring technique-related error.
Our data show a significant relationship between the increase in the density of the pancreatic tissue and age. In 202 children, Lee et al. also demonstrated an age-dependent increase in shear wave velocity [30]. Contrary to these results, Xie et al. found that age had no effect on shear wave velocity in 210 healthy volunteers [15]. The influence of the factor “age” has not yet been adequately studied. Two studies see a correlation between higher shear wave velocity and age [31, 32]. Elastographic examinations on the kidneys have confirmed a significant age-dependent increase in the velocity in children [33]. Age-related remodeling processes within organs may explain these changes. With increasing age, the tissue becomes harder due to inflammation, atrophy, or fibrotic changes and the associated loss of elasticity leads to higher shear wave velocities. Various research teams have shown gender-specific differences [32–34]. On the other hand, the results from Xie et al. refute such a difference [15].
In the body of the pancreas, our results show a reduction in the shear wave velocity as the BMI increases. Friedrich-Rust et al. found that the acoustic radiation force impulse imaging (ARFI) values in patients with pancreatic insufficiency due to cystic fibrosis were significantly lower than in those without insufficiency. The authors suggested that the deposition of fat in the tissues was responsible for this reduction [16]. A higher BMI and associated increase in total body fat means an increased risk of fatty deposition in the organs. Fat is softer than normal pancreatic parenchyma and its deposition may lead to the tissues becoming less firm, with a subsequent reduction in the shear wave velocity. Another possible explanation is the depth of the site where the measurements are being taken. Healthy volunteers with higher BMIs have a thicker abdominal wall, so that the organ lies further away from the transducer. This increased depth could result in lower measurements [29].
Our investigation into the effects of smoking, alcohol, and lipomatosis on the measurements revealed no significant relationships. It has to be remembered, however, that only a very small number of healthy volunteers were allocated to the positive control group in this random sample. Two studies have shown a significant reduction in the stiffness of the liver with transient elastography (TE) after abstinence from alcohol [35, 36]. The fact that we found no effects of alcohol consumption on our results may be partly due to the small number of healthy volunteers as well as to the way in which we recorded the history of alcohol consumption. We asked about the frequency of consumption rather than about absolute quantities of alcohol consumed and the duration of consumption.
Comparing subjects with pancreatic lipomatosis with those who did not have fatty infiltration of this organ did not produce any significant results. Motosugi et al. compared 121 patients with and without fatty deposition in the liver and 46 healthy volunteers without fatty organs. Here, too, there was no significant difference between the groups [37]. Although this result agrees with our current findings, it is somewhat unexpected, as lipomatosis should lead to softer tissue and hence lower shear wave velocities.
One of the limitations of the present study is the large number of examiners. The reliability measurements, however, show excellent results for the investigators involved in the study. Further, the angle and depth dependence of the method must be taken into consideration [38]. Also shear wave speed measurements can be influenced by increased subcutaneous fat. Since fat is soft, it can lead to a slow propagation of shear waves. This may lead to incorrect results. The pancreas lies in a close anatomical relationship with the aorta. Correspondingly, movement of the pancreas due to aortic pulsation affects the measurement of shear wave velocity. As it is impossible to eliminate this movement in living human subjects, its effects on the measurements remain unclear.
Conclusions
In summary, we can say that our data confirm that age and gender influence the shear wave velocity of the pancreas. Future research with large-scale studies targeting healthy volunteers selected on the basis of their medical history is needed to address the questions of smoking, alcohol consumption, and pancreatic lipomatosis. A more precise history of alcohol consumption (quantity and duration) is required to determine the influence of alcohol. Other possible influencing factors, such as the pressure applied with the transducer, penetration depth, and precise phase of respiration, have also to be investigated in further studies.
Compliance with ethical standards
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Footnotes
Sabina Stumpf and Heike Jaeger have equally contributed.
References
- 1.Wada K, Takaori K, Traverso LW. Screening for pancreatic cancer. Surg Clin North Am. 2015;95:1041–1052. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2015.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Farrell JJ. Prevalence, diagnosis and management of pancreatic cystic neoplasms: current status and future directions. Gut Liver. 2015;9:571–589. doi: 10.5009/gnl15063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ye X, Lu G, Huai J, Ding J. Impact of smoking on the risk of pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0124075. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Cerrito A, Falcone A, Ducreux M, Valle JW, Parnaby A, Djazouli K, Alnwick-Allu K, Hutchings A, Palaska C, Parthenaki I. A systematic review of the burden of pancreatic cancer in Europe: Real-world impact on survival, quality of life and costs. J Gastrointest Cancer. 2015;46:201–211. doi: 10.1007/s12029-015-9724-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.D’Onofrio M, Crosara S, De Robertis R, Canestrini S, Demozzi E, Pozzi Mucelli R. Elastography of the pancreas. Eur J Radiol. 2014;83:415–419. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.04.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gerber L, Kasper D, Fitting D, Knop V, Vermehren A, Sprinzl K, Hansmann ML, Herrmann E, Bojunga J, Albert J, Sarrazin C, Zeuzem S, Friedrich-Rust M. Assessment of liver fibrosis with 2-D shear wave elastography in comparison to transient elastography and acoustic radiation force impulse imaging in patients with chronic liver disease. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2015;41:2350–2359. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.04.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Remonti LR, Kramer CK, Leitão CB, Pinto LC, Gross JL. Thyroid ultrasound features and risk of carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Thyroid. 2015;25:538–550. doi: 10.1089/thy.2014.0353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Shiina T, Nightingale KR, Palmeri ML, Hall TJ, Bamber JC, Barr RG, Castera L, Choi BI, Chou YH, Cosgrove D, Dietrich CF, Ding H, Amy D, Farrokh A, Ferraioli G, Filice C, Friedrich-Rust M, Nakashima K, Schafer F, Sporea I, Suzuki S, Wilson S, Kudo M. WFUMB guidelines and recommendations for clinical use of ultrasound elastography: part 1: basic principles and terminology. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2015;41:1126–1147. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.03.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Barr RG, Nakashima K, Amy D, Cosgrove D, Farrokh A, Schafer F, Bamber JC, Castera L, Choi BI, Chou YH, Dietrich CF, Ding H, Ferraioli G, Filice C, Friedrich-Rust M, Hall TJ, Nightingale KR, Palmeri ML, Shiina T, Suzuki S, Sporea I, Wilson S, Kudo M. WFUMB guidelines and recommendations for clinical use of ultrasound elastography: part 2: breast. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2015;41:1148–1160. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Barr RG, Zhang Z. Shear-wave elastography of the breast: value of a quality measure and comparison with strain elastography. Radiology. 2015;275:45–53. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14132404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ciurea A, Calin A, Ciortea C, Dudea SM. Ultrasound in the diagnosis of papillary breast lesions. Med Ultrason. 2015;17:392–397. doi: 10.11152/mu.2013.2066.173.aci. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Li DD, Guo LH, Xu HX, Liu C, Xu JM, Sun LP, Wu J, Liu BJ, Liu LN, Xu XH. Acoustic radiation force impulse elastography for differentiation of malignant and benign breast lesions: a meta-analysis. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8:4753–4761. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Yashima Y, Sasahira N, Isayama H, Kogure H, Ikeda H, Hirano K, Mizuno S, Yagioka H, Kawakubo K, Sasaki T, Nakai Y, Tada M, Yoshida H, Omata M, Koike K. Acoustic radiation force impulse elastography for noninvasive assessment of chronic pancreatitis. J Gastroenterol. 2012;47:427–432. doi: 10.1007/s00535-011-0491-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mateen MA, Muheet KA, Mohan RJ, Rao PN, Majaz HM, Rao GV, Reddy DN. Evaluation of ultrasound based acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) and eSie touch sonoelastography for diagnosis of inflammatory pancreatic diseases. JOP. 2012;13:36–44. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Xie J, Zou L, Yao M, Xu G, Zhao L, Xu H, Wu R. A preliminary investigation of normal pancreas and acute pancreatitis elasticity using virtual touch tissue quantification (VTQ) imaging. Med Sci Monit. 2015;21:1693–1699. doi: 10.12659/MSM.892239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Friedrich-Rust M, Schlueter N, Smaczny C, Eickmeier O, Rosewich M, Feifel K, Herrmann E, Poynard T, Gleiber W, Lais C, Zielen S, Wagner TO, Zeuzem S, Bojunga J. Non-invasive measurement of liver and pancreas fibrosis in patients with cystic fibrosis. J Cyst Fibros. 2013;12:431–439. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2012.12.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Harada N, Ishizawa T, Inoue Y, Aoki T, Sakamoto Y, Hasegawa K, Sugawara Y, Tanaka M, Fukayama M, Kokudo N. Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging of the pancreas for estimation of pathologic fibrosis and risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;219(887–894):e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.07.940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kawada N, Tanaka S, Uehara H, Takakura R, Katayama K, Fukuda J, Matsuno N, Takenaka A, Ishikawa O. Feasibility of second-generation transabdominal ultrasound-elastography to evaluate solid pancreatic tumors: preliminary report of 36 cases. Pancreas. 2012;41:978–980. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e3182499b84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Park MK, Jo J, Kwon H, Cho JH, Oh JY, Noh MH, Nam KJ. Usefulness of acoustic radiation force impulse elastography in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant solid pancreatic lesions. Ultrasonography. 2014;33:26–33. doi: 10.14366/usg.13017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.D’Onofrio M, Crosara S, Canestrini S, Demozzi E, De Robertis R, Salvia R, Bassi C, Mucelli RP. Virtual analysis of pancreatic cystic lesion fluid content by ultrasound acoustic radiation force impulse quantification. J Ultrasound Med. 2013;32:647–651. doi: 10.7863/jum.2013.32.4.647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Meng FS, Zhang ZH, Ji F. New endoscopic ultrasound techniques for digestive tract diseases: a comprehensive review. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:4809–4816. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i16.4809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Gallotti A, D’Onofrio M, Pozzi Mucelli R. Acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) technique in ultrasound with virtual touch tissue quantification of the upper abdomen. Radiol Med. 2010;115:889–897. doi: 10.1007/s11547-010-0504-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Goertz RS, Amann K, Heide R, Bernatik T, Neurath MF, Strobel D. An abdominal and thyroid status with acoustic radiation force impulse elastometry: a feasibility study: acoustic radiation force impulse elastometry of human organs. Eur J Radiol. 2011;80:e226–e230. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.09.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Arda K, Ciledag N, Aktas E, Aribas BK, Köse K. Quantitative assessment of normal soft-tissue elasticity using shear-wave ultrasound elastography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197:532–536. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.5449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Puri KS, Suresh KR, Gogtay NJ, Thatte UM. Declaration of Helsinki, 2008: implications for stakeholders in research. J Postgrad Med. 2009;55:131–134. doi: 10.4103/0022-3859.52846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Pezzilli R, Calculli L. Pancreatic steatosis: is it related to either obesity or diabetes mellitus? World J Diabetes. 2014;5:415–419. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v5.i4.415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ling W, Lu Q, Quan J, Ma L, Luo Y. Assessment of impact factors on shear wave based liver stiffness measurement. Eur J Radiol. 2013;82:335–341. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Galgenmueller S, Jaeger H, Kratzer W, Schmidt SA, Oeztuerk S, Haenle MM, Mason RA, Graeter T. Parameters affecting different acoustic radiation force impulse applications in the diagnosis of fibrotic liver changes. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:8425–8432. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i27.8425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Potthoff A, Attia D, Pischke S, Kirschner J, Mederacke I, Wedemeyer H, Manns MP, Gebel MJ, Rifai K. Influence of different frequencies and insertion depths on the diagnostic accuracy of liver elastography by acoustic radiation force impulse imaging (ARFI) Eur J Radiol. 2013;82:1207–1212. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lee MJ, Kim MJ, Han KH, Yoon CS. Age-related changes in liver, kidney, and spleen stiffness in healthy children measured with acoustic radiation force impulse imaging. Eur J Radiol. 2013;82:e290–e294. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.01.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bota S, Bob F, Sporea I, Şirli R, Popescu A. Factors that influence kidney shear wave speed assessed by acoustic radiation force impulse elastography in patients without kidney pathology. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2015;41:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2014.07.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Popescu A, Sporea I, Sirli R, Bota S, Focşa M, Dănilă M, Nicoliţă D, Martie A, Sendroiu M, Juchiş A. The mean values of liver stiffness assessed by acoustic radiation force impulse elastography in normal subjects. Med Ultrason. 2011;13:33–37. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Guo LH, Xu HX, Fu HJ, Peng A, Zhang YF, Liu LN. Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging for noninvasive evaluation of renal parenchyma elasticity: preliminary findings. PLoS One. 2013;8:e68925. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Liao LY, Kuo KL, Chiang HS, Lin CZ, Lin YP, Lin CL. Acoustic radiation force impulse elastography of the liver in healthy patients: test location, reference range and influence of gender and body mass index. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2015;41:698–704. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2014.09.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Gelsi E, Dainese R, Truchi R, Mariné-Barjoan E, Anty R, Autuori M, Burroni S, Vanbiervliet G, Evesque L, Cherikh F, Tran A. Effect of detoxification on liver stiffness assessed by Fibroscan® in alcoholic patients. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2011;35:566–570. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2010.01374.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Bardou-Jacquet E, Legros L, Soro D, Latournerie M, Guillygomarc’h A, Le Lan C, Brissot P, Guyader D, Moirand R. Effect of alcohol consumption on liver stiffness measured by transient elastography. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19:516–522. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i4.516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Motosugi U, Ichikawa T, Niitsuma Y, Araki T. Acoustic radiation force impulse elastography of the liver: can fat deposition in the liver affect the measurement of liver stiffness? Jpn J Radiol. 2011;29:639–643. doi: 10.1007/s11604-011-0607-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Zhao H, Song P, Urban MW, Kinnick RR, Yin M, Greenleaf JF, Chen S. Bias observed in time-of-flight shear wave speed measurements using radiation force of a focused ultrasound beam. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2011;37:1884–1892. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2011.07.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]