Skip to main content
Applications in Plant Sciences logoLink to Applications in Plant Sciences
. 2016 Jun 14;4(6):apps.1500143. doi: 10.3732/apps.1500143

Development and characterization of SSR markers for Aster savatieri (Asteraceae)1

Naoko Ishikawa 2,4, Shota Sakaguchi 3, Motomi Ito 2
PMCID: PMC4915918  PMID: 27347451

Abstract

Premise of the study:

Simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers were developed for Aster savatieri (Asteraceae) and the serpentine variety A. savatieri var. pygmaeus to re-evaluate their taxonomic status.

Methods and Results:

Using RNA-Seq data, 22 expressed sequence tag (EST)–SSR markers were developed. Polymorphisms were assessed in A. savatieri and in A. savatieri var. pygmaeus. The average number of alleles ranged from four to 15, and expected heterozygosity ranged from 0.417 to 0.870. Transferability was examined in six representative species of Japanese Aster and in Solidago virgaurea subsp. asiatica var. asiatica, a member of the tribe Astereae (Asteraceae); most of the loci were transferable to these examined species.

Conclusions:

These markers will be useful for genetic studies of variation in A. savatieri and other Aster species that occur in Japan.

Keywords: Aster, Asteraceae, EST-SSR, serpentine plant


Aster savatieri Makino (Asteraceae) is a perennial herb endemic to Japan (Makino, 1898). It grows in the understory of forests on the islands of Honshu, Shikoku, and Kyushu and is distinguishable from other Japanese congeners by the lack of pappus in its achene and its spring flowering habit (flowering of other species occurs from summer to fall). Aster savatieri var. pygmaeus Makino was originally recognized as a dwarf form occurring on Mt. Asama, in Mie Prefecture, Honshu, Japan (Makino, 1913). However, the taxonomic treatment of this variety is controversial. Dwarf forms have been reported from other localities in southwestern Honshu and Shikoku, and these were sometimes considered as var. pygmaeus (Makino, 1918; Kitamura, 1936). In contrast, Iwatsuki et al. (1995) considered var. pygmaeus to be a dwarf form endemic to serpentine areas in Aichi Prefecture, Mie Prefecture (= Mt. Asama), and Shikoku. Ploidy levels may be considered in taxonomic studies because differences in ploidy can affect plant size (Kondorosi et al., 2000; Tsukaya, 2013). Although few studies have examined ploidy levels in A. savatieri, a nonserpentine population of var. pygmaeus has been reported to be diploid and polymorphisms have often been found in western Honshu populations of A. savatieri (2n = 2x = 18, 2n = 3x = 27, 2n = 4x = 36; Huziwara, 1954; N. Ishikawa, T. Fukuda, S. Sakaguchi, and M. Ito, unpublished data). Therefore, the taxonomic discrimination of A. savatieri var. savatieri from A. savatieri var. pygmaeus requires analyses of the genetic relationships among serpentine and nonserpentine populations, as well as among populations with different ploidy levels.

Although eight simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers have been reported for A. amellus L. (Mayor and Naciri, 2007), only two polymorphic markers have been successfully amplified by PCR in A. savatieri (Y. Morishita and M. Ito, unpublished data). Thus, additional markers are needed to investigate the population divergence in greater detail. We developed 22 polymorphic expressed sequence tag (EST)–SSR markers for A. savatieri and evaluated their polymorphisms in, and transferability to, multiple species of Aster L. and a related genus.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Total RNA was extracted from A. savatieri (Appendix 1; Aichi population) and A. savatieri var. pygmaeus (Appendix 1; Kochi population) using the Agilent Plant RNA Isolation Mini Kit (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, California, USA). Normalized cDNA libraries of shoots and roots of A. savatieri were constructed and sequenced using the HiSeq 2000 system (Illumina, San Diego, California, USA). De novo assembly of 37,253,459 cleaned 100-bp reads using Trinity (Grabherr et al., 2011) produced 162,360 contigs (N50: 1678 bp). A cDNA library of A. savatieri var. pygmaeus inflorescences was constructed and sequenced using the Ion Torrent Personal Genome Machine (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA). De novo assembly of 8,280,151 cleaned reads (≥400 bp) with CLC Genomics Workbench version 7.5.1 software (CLC bio, Aarhus, Denmark) produced 81,275 contigs (word size 43, bubble size 40, N50: 502 bp).

Microsatellite regions (≥10 dinucleotide repeats, ≥7 trinucleotide repeats) were searched using MSATCOMMANDER (Faircloth, 2008). Primer pairs with an optimal annealing temperature of 60 ± 2°C, a GC content of 30–70%, and a product size range of 100–500 bp were generated by Primer3 (Rozen and Skaletsky, 1999). We obtained 118 and 284 primer sets for A. savatieri and A. savatieri var. pygmaeus, respectively. Each of the 48 primer sets was selected from the two taxa based on the repeat numbers. For all loci, the forward primer was synthesized with one of three different M13 sequences (5′-CACGACGTTGTAAAACGAC-3′, 5′-TGTGGAATTGTGAGCGG-3′, or 5′-CTATAGGGCACGCGTGGT-3′) and the reverse primer was tagged with a PIG-tail (5′-GTTTCTT-3′). A similarity search of each contig against the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) nr database was conducted using the BLASTX algorithm. PCR reactions were performed using a QIAGEN Multiplex PCR Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) in a 10-μL volume containing 5–10 ng DNA, 5 μL 2× Multiplex PCR Master Mix, 0.01 μM forward primer, 0.2 μM reverse primer, and 0.1 μM fluorescently labeled M13 primer. The PCR protocol was as follows: 95°C for 3 min; followed by 35 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 57°C for 3 min, 68°C for 1 min; and a 20-min extension at 68°C. The PCR product was loaded with DNA Size Standard 600 (Beckman Coulter, Brea, California, USA) onto a GenomeLab GeXP Genetic Analysis System (Beckman Coulter), and fragment size was determined with CEQ fragment analysis software (Beckman Coulter).

For PCR amplification trials, we used two individuals from each of the two A. savatieri populations (Appendix 1; Aichi and Nagano populations) and the two A. savatieri var. pygmaeus populations (Appendix 1; Mie and Kochi populations). For the 22 primer pairs that showed clear peaks (Table 1), 24 individuals from each population (Aichi, Kyoto, and Mie) were evaluated for polymorphisms. All of the 24 individuals were considered to be diploid because no more than two alleles were found in any loci. We also confirmed the diploid status of these samples by microscopic chromosome counting of one individual from the Mie population, which showed that it was diploid (2n = 2x = 18). Flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey, USA) analyses of 10 individuals from each population revealed that all were diploid. Summary statistics were generated using GenAlEx 6.5 software (Peakall and Smouse, 2012), i.e., number of alleles per locus (A), expected heterozygosity (He), and observed heterozygosity (Ho). The significance of Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium and genotypic equilibrium was tested by 1000 randomizations with adjustment of the resulting P values through the Bonferroni correction using FSTAT 2.9.3 software (Goudet, 1995).

Table 1.

EST-SSR markers for Aster savatieri and A. savatieri var. pygmaeus.

Locus Primer sequences (5′–3′)a Repeat motif Allele size range (bp) Fluorescent dye BlastX top hit description E-value GenBank accession no.
Ast_comp41702_c0_seq1 F: TGTGGAATTGTGAGCGGTGGCCAACACAACGAAACGR: GTTTCTTCTGCTTCTTCATCACCACCC (AAC)7 329–335 D3 PREDICTED: probable WRKY transcription factor 14 [Vitis vinifera] 5E-86 FX983032
Ast_comp53978_c4_seq1 F: CACGACGTTGTAAAACGACCAAAGTGTTGGTTCCGAGACCR: GTTTCTTTCATGGATGTCGCTGAACAAC (AAG)7 197–203 D2 Polyphenol oxidase [Taraxacum officinale] 0.0 FX983033
Ast_comp54189_c0_seq15 F: TGTGGAATTGTGAGCGGATTCACAATGTCCAGCCAGCR: GTTTCTTATGTAGGTCGAAAGGGTGGC (ACC)7 182 D3 Hypothetical protein PHAVU_006G115800g [Phaseolus vulgaris] 4E-12 FX983034
Ast_comp22325_c0_seq1 F: TGTGGAATTGTGAGCGGTGTGAATCGGTTGCATAGCCR: GTTTCTTCACCAGTCCAACACAAAGCC (ACC)7 136–148 D3 PREDICTED: transcription factor HEC2-like [Sesamum indicum] 9E-75 FX983035
Ast_comp37017_c0_seq1 F: CACGACGTTGTAAAACGACTCAGATCCAACAGGCAAGTGR: GTTTCTTAAACCACCATGTCCCTGCC (ACC)7 166–181 D2 PREDICTED: zinc finger CCCH domain-containing protein 14-like [Nelumbo nucifera] 9E-103 FX983036
Ast_comp36481_c0_seq1 F: CTATAGGGCACGCGTGGTGAGGTTCTTGAAGACTGCTGCR: GTTTCTTGCCCTCCCACTTCTACCTTC (AGC)8 302–332 D4 S-adenosylmethionine synthase 2 [Cucumis melo] 0.0 FX983037
Ast_comp55030_c0_seq87 F: CACGACGTTGTAAAACGACTCACAAATCAAACCACCGGCR: GTTTCTTCCATGGAAGTATAGAGCGCG (CCG)7 267–279 D2 PREDICTED: N(6)-adenine-specific DNA methyltransferase 2 isoform X1 [Nicotiana tomentosiformis] 2.00E-103 FX983038
Ast_comp41314_c0_seq1 F: CTATAGGGCACGCGTGGTAGACCACCCAGATCTCTTTGTCR: GTTTCTTTCGCACGGTTAGATTCTCAC (AAC)7 159–210 D4 PREDICTED: uncharacterized protein LOC104099663 [Nicotiana tomentosiformis] 2E-37 FX983039
Ast_comp48897_c0_seq1 F: TGTGGAATTGTGAGCGGCACCAACATCATCCTCAGGGR: GTTTCTTAAATTGATGCCCACAACGCC (AGC)7 190–220 D3 Predicted protein [Nematostella vectensis] 0.15 FX983040
Ast_comp51216_c2_seq2 F: CACGACGTTGTAAAACGACCGATTTGGCTCACTGGAACG (AAC)7 350–374 D2 No significant similarity found. FX983041
R: GTTTCTTTCCCACTCGAACCAGGTTTC
Ast_comp50838_c2_seq2 F: CACGACGTTGTAAAACGACGTGCTGATCCGGTGTTCTTCR: GTTTCTTGCTTCAAAGGGTGGTTCAGG (ACC)7 204–210 D2 PREDICTED: uncharacterized protein LOC105170415 [Sesamum indicum] 0.00002 FX983042
Ast_comp55875_c0_seq1 F: TGTGGAATTGTGAGCGGGCCCGAGCCTTTAATCCAACR: GTTTCTTTGTTCCACGCTCATCTCTCC (CCG)7 167–191 D3 PREDICTED: probable prefoldin subunit 5 [Nicotiana tomentosiformis] 3E-79 FX983043
Ast_comp53959_c2_seq2 F: CACGACGTTGTAAAACGACGAAGAAGAAGGTGGTGTGGCR: GTTTCTTAGGCGGGTTCTCATTCTCTAC (ATC)7 155–173 D2 Hypothetical protein PRUPE_ppa002546mg [Prunus persica] 2E-122 FX983044
Ast_comp46752_c1_seq1 F: CACGACGTTGTAAAACGACATACTCTCGGGTCTGCACAGR: GTTTCTTGGACTTTCCCTAGGCTTCCG (AGG)7 181–199 D2 PREDICTED: UPF0503 protein At3g09070, chloroplastic-like [Solanum tuberosum] 9E-69 FX983045
Ast_33509 F: CACGACGTTGTAAAACGACTTTCATCATGGGCCTGTCACR: GTTTCTTTTTGCATCTTCTGGTGGCTC (AAG)10 201–225 D2 Unnamed protein product [Vitis vinifera] 9.00E-14 FX983024
Ast_19559 F: CACGACGTTGTAAAACGACACGACGATGAACATAGCAGCR: GTTTCTTTACCACGCTCAGCCAGTATC (ATC)12 220–235 D2 Hypothetical protein MIMGU_mgv1a003121mg [Erythranthe guttata] 1.00E-10 FX983025
Ast_44410 F: TGTGGAATTGTGAGCGGAGATCCAGAACCAACCACCG (ATC)11 248–257 D3 No significant similarity found. FX983026
R: GTTTCTTACTTACGGTGTCAACAAACTTG
Ast_65237 F: CTATAGGGCACGCGTGGTAGGGTCGATACTACTGTGGC (AC)11 213–221 D4 No significant similarity found. FX983027
R: GTTTCTTCATTCACCCAAAGCCCGTAC
Ast_47436 F: CACGACGTTGTAAAACGACGGTCTTTCTCCCTCCTTTGAAGR: GTTTCTTGGTATCTCCTGTTTCTGCGG (AAG)11 131–185 D2 PREDICTED: heat shock cognate 71 kDa protein-like [Amphimedon queenslandica] 3.00E-04 FX983028
Ast_34501 F: CACGACGTTGTAAAACGACGGGTGCATCAGAATCCGTACR: GTTTCTTTGGCGGTAATCTAGGTGTCC (AAC)10 292–307 D2 PREDICTED: uncharacterized protein LOC104095266 [Nicotiana tomentosiformis] 0.23 FX983029
Ast_59032 F: CACGACGTTGTAAAACGACTTGTTAATGGCGGGCATCTC (AGC)11 247–253 D2 No significant similarity found. FX983030
R: GTTTCTTGCGACGACTGCAGAATTGG
Ast_26109 F: CACGACGTTGTAAAACGACCGTGAGTCAAACCCGAGAACR: GTTTCTTCGCCTTCAAATCCTCCAACTC (AC)11 462–498 D2 PREDICTED: interactor of constitutive active ROPs 2 [Vitis vinifera] 3.00E-146 FX983031
R: GTTTCTTCGCCTTCAAATCCTCCAACTC
a

Forward and reverse primer sequence (with tag sequence).

Twenty-two primer pairs were polymorphic; A ranged from four to 15 alleles, while He and Ho ranged from 0.417 to 0.870 and 0.174 to 0.690, respectively (Table 2). No significant departures from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium were detected for any of the populations or loci after correcting for multiple tests (nominal level of significance: 0.05). No significant genotypic equilibrium was detected for any pair of loci. We examined the transferability of these primers to six representative Japanese Aster species and Solidago virgaurea L. subsp. asiatica Kitam. ex H. Hara var. asiatica Nakai ex H. Hara, a member of the tribe Astereae (Asteraceae). The Aster species were selected to cover the main lineages of Japanese Aster (Table 3; Appendix 1; Ito et al., 1998). The Solidago L. species was included to assess the general applicability of the primers. The PCR protocol was as follows: 95°C for 3 min; 40 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 57.5°C for 3 min (with reductions of 0.1°C per cycle), 68°C for 1 min; with a 20-min extension at 68°C. Of the 22 EST-SSR primer pairs tested, 14–20 and 16 loci were successfully amplified in the six Aster species and S. virgaurea subsp. asiatica var. asiatica, respectively (Table 3, Appendix 1). Thus, most of the loci were transferable to the examined species.

Table 2.

Characteristics of the 22 polymorphic EST-SSR markers for Aster savatieri and A. savatieri var. pygmaeus.

A. savatieri
Aichi population (N = 24) Kyoto population (N = 24) A. savatieri var. pygmaeus (Mie population) (N = 24) All (N = 72)
Locus A He Ho A He Ho A He Ho A He Ho
Ast_comp41702_c0_seq1 2 0.080 0.083 6 0.800 0.750 3 0.119 0.125 6 0.707 0.319
Ast_comp53978_c4_seq1 3 0.385 0.417 4 0.490 0.524 2 0.478 0.542 4 0.633 0.493
Ast_comp54189_c0_seq15 1 0.000 0.000 4 0.580 0.542 2 0.080 0.000 4 0.417 0.181
Ast_comp22325_c0_seq1 2 0.469 0.500 5 0.468 0.458 2 0.153 0.167 6 0.607 0.375
Ast_comp37017_c0_seq1 5 0.659 0.708 5 0.493 0.375 3 0.559 0.458 7 0.758 0.514
Ast_comp36481_c0_seq1 3 0.612 0.500 6 0.700 0.583 3 0.405 0.458 7 0.741 0.514
Ast_comp55030_c0_seq87 2 0.041 0.042 7 0.740 0.714 2 0.041 0.042 8 0.679 0.246
Ast_comp41314_c0_seq1 5 0.654 0.458 10 0.857 0.625 6 0.655 0.667 13 0.858 0.583
Ast_comp48897_c0_seq1 5 0.722 0.333 11 0.828 0.500 4 0.650 0.167 13 0.870 0.333
Ast_comp51216_c2_seq2 2 0.478 0.542 10 0.774 0.429 3 0.569 0.583 10 0.658 0.522
Ast_comp50838_c2_seq2 2 0.444 0.333 8 0.741 0.783 2 0.117 0.125 11 0.666 0.408
Ast_comp55875_c0_seq1 2 0.353 0.375 6 0.715 0.792 3 0.559 0.417 11 0.848 0.528
Ast_comp53959_c2_seq2 3 0.226 0.167 5 0.642 0.304 3 0.471 0.083 8 0.789 0.183
Ast_comp46752_c1_seq1 4 0.609 0.333 4 0.560 0.522 4 0.617 0.458 9 0.837 0.437
Ast_33509 7 0.798 0.833 10 0.811 0.750 4 0.556 0.458 13 0.851 0.681
Ast_19559 4 0.606 0.542 4 0.430 0.417 3 0.288 0.333 6 0.696 0.431
Ast_44410 2 0.478 0.708 3 0.553 0.609 3 0.226 0.250 5 0.479 0.521
Ast_65237 4 0.630 0.667 9 0.820 0.667 3 0.525 0.542 15 0.868 0.625
Ast_47436 3 0.478 0.042 7 0.654 0.048 7 0.647 0.417 14 0.861 0.174
Ast_34501 5 0.749 0.875 7 0.787 0.739 6 0.423 0.292 10 0.793 0.634
Ast_59032 2 0.080 0.083 7 0.794 0.750 3 0.392 0.417 7 0.579 0.417
Ast_26109 6 0.718 0.625 6 0.721 0.609 9 0.813 0.833 14 0.859 0.690
Average 3.4 0.467 0.417 6.5 0.680 0.568 3.6 0.425 0.356 9.1 0.730 0.446

Note: A = number of alleles per locus; He = expected heterozygosity; Ho = observed heterozygosity; N = number of individuals genotyped.

Table 3.

Transferability of the 22 EST-SSR markers for Japanese Aster and Solidago species.

Locus A. ageratoides var. ageratoides (N = 3)a A. glehnii var. hondoensis (N = 2)b A. hispidus var. tubulosus (N = 2)b,c A. rugulosus (N = 6)a A. scaber (N = 3)b A. sohayakiensis (N = 2)b S. virgaurea subsp. asiatica var. asiatica (N = 4)a A. savatieri (Nagano population) (N = 2)b,d A. savatieri var. pygmaeus (Kochi population) (N = 2)b,d
Ast_comp41702_c0_seq1 + + + + +
Ast_comp53978_c4_seq1 + + + + + +
Ast_comp54189_c0_seq15 + NG NG + + NG +
Ast_comp22325_c0_seq1 NG + +
Ast_comp37017_c0_seq1 + + + + + + +
Ast_comp36481_c0_seq1 + + + + + +
Ast_comp55030_c0_seq87 + + + + + NG +
Ast_comp41314_c0_seq1 NG NG NG NG NG + +
Ast_comp48897_c0_seq1 + NG + NG + + NG + +
Ast_comp51216_c2_seq2 + + + + + NG + +
Ast_comp50838_c2_seq2 NG + + + NG
Ast_comp55875_c0_seq1 + NG NG + + +
Ast_comp53959_c2_seq2 NG + + NG + +
Ast_comp46752_c1_seq1 + + + + + +
Ast_33509 + + + + + +
Ast_19559 NG NG + + NG + + +
Ast_44410 NG NG + + + NG + +
Ast_65237 + + + + + + + + +
Ast_47436 NG NG NG NG NG NG NG
Ast_34501 + NG + + + +
Ast_59032 + NG + + + +
Ast_26109 + NG + + + +
No. of successfully amplified loci 18 14 15 19 20 17 16 21 22

Note: — = monomorphic (only one allele was detected); + = polymorphic (more than one allele was detected); NG = no signal or nonspecific amplification was detected in PCR amplification.

a

Individuals originated from more than one population.

b

Individuals originated from a single population.

c

Putative tetraploid.

d

Samples used for initial PCR amplification trials.

CONCLUSIONS

The 22 EST-SSR markers developed were substantially polymorphic within and between populations. Thus, these markers will be useful for investigations of intraspecific relationships among A. savatieri var. savatieri and A. savatieri var. pygmaeus populations occurring at serpentine and nonserpentine sites. Transferability analyses were conducted with six representative species of Japanese Aster and S. virgaurea subsp. asiatica var. asiatica, a member of the tribe Astereae (Asteraceae). Of the 32 Japanese Aster species, 20 are endemic to Japan and 11 are regarded as endangered (Iwatsuki et al., 1995; Ministry of the Environment, 2012). Thus, our markers should also prove useful in conservation-directed investigations of genetic variation in endangered Aster species that occur in Japan.

Appendix 1.

Voucher information for Aster and Solidago species used in this study.

Species Population Collection locality Geographic coordinates (Altitude) N Voucher specimen accession no.a
Samples used for cDNA library construction
Aster savatieri Aichi Hasso, Inuyama, Aichi Prefec., Japan 35°21′38″N, 137°01′34″E 2 TI00010644
Aster savatieri var. pygmaeus Kochi Hidaka, Takaoka, Kochi Prefec., Japan 33°32′48″N, 133°20′54″E 6 TI00010646
Samples used for initial PCR amplification trials
Aster savatieri Nagano Togakushi, Nagano, Nagano Prefec., Japan 36°45′40″N, 138°04′09″E 2 TI00010645
Aster savatieri var. pygmaeus Kochi Hidaka, Takaoka, Kochi Prefec., Japan 33°32′48″N, 133°20′54″E 2 TI00010646
Samples used for initial PCR amplification trials and detailed evaluation for polymorphisms
Aster savatieri Aichi Hasso, Inuyama, Aichi Prefec., Japan 35°21′38″N, 137°01′34″E 24 TI00010644
Aster savatieri var. pygmaeus Mie Asama, Ise, Mie Prefec., Japan 34°27′34″N, 136°47′05″E 24 TI00010647
Samples used for detailed evaluation for polymorphisms
Aster savatieri Kyoto Ashiu, Miyama, Nantan, Kyoto Prefec., Japan 35°19′42″N, 135°43′42″E (528 m) 24 TI00010656
Samples used for transferability test
Aster ageratoides Turcz. var. ageratoides Ashio Ashio, Nikko, Tochigi Prefec., Japan 36°43′00″N, 139°29′07″E 2 TI00010648
Aster ageratoides var. ageratoides Chugushi Chugushi, Nikko, Tochigi Prefec., Japan 36°43′28″N, 139°29′09″E 1 TI00010649
Aster glehnii F. Schmidt var. hondoensis  Kitam. Chugushi, Nikko, Tochigi Prefec., Japan 36°46′13″N, 139°27′17″E 2 TI00010654
Aster hispidus Thunb. var. tubulosus  K. Asano Shimoina, Nagano Prefec., Japan b 2 TI00010650
Aster rugulosus Maxim. Tsugeno Tsugeno, Shinshiro, Aichi Prefec., Japan 34°51′37″N, 137°34′45″E 2 TI00010652
Aster rugulosus NAGN-a83 Naganoyama, Shinshiro, Aichi Prefec., Japan 35°00′02″N, 137°27′18″E 1 NA
Aster rugulosus Bibai Nishibibai, Bibai, Hokkaido, Japan 43°19′30″N, 141°48′39″E 1 NA
Aster rugulosus KAWM-GH2 Kawaminami, Koyu, Miyazaki Prefec., Japan 32°12′15″N, 131°31′40″E 1 NA
Aster rugulosus KIBG-A5 Shigaraki, Koga, Shiga Prefec., Japan 34°56′35″N, 135°57′29″E 1 NA
Aster scaber Thunb. Onan, Ochi, Shimane Prefec., Japan 34°55′30″N, 132°28′31″E 3 TI00010651
Aster sohayakiensis Koidz. Wadagawa, Shingu, Wakayama Prefec., Japan 33°45′56″N, 135°50′14″E 2 TI00010653
Solidago virgaurea L. subsp. asiatica  Kitam. ex H. Hara var. asiatica  Nakai ex H. Hara Serpentine soil Mukawa, Yufutsu, Hokkaido, Japan 42°51′18″N, 142°15′22″E (168 m) 2 TI00010655
Solidago virgaurea subsp. asiatica  var. asiatica Forest Mukawa, Yufutsu, Hokkaido, Japan 42°51′26.9″N, 142°15′33.6″E (183 m) 2 NA

Note: N = number of individuals; NA = voucher unavailable.

a

Vouchers deposited at the University of Tokyo (TI), Tokyo, Japan.

b

GPS data are not shown because this variety is critically endangered, but are available from the authors upon request.

LITERATURE CITED

  1. Faircloth B. C. 2008. MSATCOMMANDER: Detection of microsatellite repeat arrays and automated, locus-specific primer design. Molecular Ecology Resources 8: 92–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Goudet J. 1995. FSTAT: A computer program to calculate F statistics, version 1.2. Journal of Heredity 86: 485–486. [Google Scholar]
  3. Grabherr M. G., Haas B. J., Yassour M., Levin J. Z., Thompson D. A., Amit I., Adiconis X., et al. 2011. Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nature Biotechnology 29: 644–652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Huziwara Y. 1954. Karyotype analysis in Gymnaster. Japanese Journal of Genetics 29: 76–82. [Google Scholar]
  5. Ito M., Soejima A., Watanabe K. 1998. Phylogenetic relationships of Japanese Aster (Asteraceae, Astereae) sensu lato based on chloroplast-DNA restriction site mutations. Journal of Plant Research 111: 217–223. [Google Scholar]
  6. Iwatsuki K., Yamazaki T., Boufford D. E., Ohba H. 1995. Flora of Japan, Vol. IIIb: Angiospermae, Dicotyledoneae, Sympetalae (b). Kodansha, Tokyo, Japan. [Google Scholar]
  7. Kitamura S. 1936. Expositiones plantarum novarum Orientali-Asiaticum 1. Acta Phytotaxonomica et Geobotanica 5: 243–244. [Google Scholar]
  8. Kondorosi E., Roudier F., Gendreau E. 2000. Plant cell-size control: Growing by ploidy? Current Opinion in Plant Biology 3: 488–492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Makino T. 1898. Plantae Japonenses novae vel minus cognitae. Botanical Magazine (Tokyo) 12: 45–52. [Google Scholar]
  10. Makino T. 1913. Aster savatieri In C. Iinuma , Zotei Somoku Zusetsu 4, p. 1101. Seibido, Tokyo, Japan. [Google Scholar]
  11. Makino T. 1918. A contribution to the knowledge of the flora of Japan. Journal of Japanese Botany 2: 11–14. [Google Scholar]
  12. Mayor R., Naciri Y. 2007. Identification and characterization of eight microsatellite loci in Aster amellus L. (Asteraceae). Molecular Ecology Notes 7: 233–235. [Google Scholar]
  13. Ministry of the Environment, Government of Japan. 2012. Red list of vascular plants in Japan. Website https://www.env.go.jp/press/15619.html [accessed 18 May 2016] (in Japanese).
  14. Peakall R., Smouse P. E. 2012. GenAlEx 6.5: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research—An update. Bioinformatics 28: 2537–2539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Rozen S., Skaletsky H. 1999. Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. In S. Misener and S. A. Krawetz [eds.], Methods in molecular biology, vol. 132: Bioinformatics methods and protocols, 365–386. Humana Press, Totowa, New Jersey, USA. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Tsukaya H. 2013. Does ploidy level directly control cell size? Counterevidence from Arabidopsis genetics. PLoS ONE 8: e83729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applications in Plant Sciences are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES