ABSTRACT
The generation of complex three-dimensional structures is a key developmental step for most eukaryotic organisms. The details of the molecular machinery controlling this step remain to be determined. An excellent model system to study this general process is the generation of three-dimensional fruiting bodies in filamentous fungi like Sordaria macrospora. Fruiting body development is controlled by subunits of the highly conserved striatin-interacting phosphatase and kinase (STRIPAK) complex, which has been described in organisms ranging from yeasts to humans. The highly conserved heterotrimeric protein phosphatase PP2A is a subunit of STRIPAK. Here, catalytic subunit 1 of PP2A was functionally characterized. The Δpp2Ac1 strain is sterile, unable to undergo hyphal fusion, and devoid of ascogonial septation. Further, PP2Ac1, together with STRIPAK subunit PRO22, governs vegetative and stress-related growth. We revealed in vitro catalytic activity of wild-type PP2Ac1, and our in vivo analysis showed that inactive PP2Ac1 blocks the complementation of the sterile deletion strain. Tandem affinity purification, followed by mass spectrometry and yeast two-hybrid analysis, verified that PP2Ac1 is a subunit of STRIPAK. Further, these data indicate links between the STRIPAK complex and other developmental signaling pathways, implying the presence of a large interconnected signaling network that controls eukaryotic developmental processes. The insights gained in our study can be transferred to higher eukaryotes and will be important for understanding eukaryotic cellular development in general.
IMPORTANCE
The striatin-interacting phosphatase and kinase (STRIPAK) complex is highly conserved from yeasts to humans and is an important regulator of numerous eukaryotic developmental processes, such as cellular signaling and cell development. Although functional insights into the STRIPAK complex are accumulating, the detailed molecular mechanisms of single subunits are only partially understood. The first fungal STRIPAK was described in Sordaria macrospora, which is a well-established model organism used to study the formation of fungal fruiting bodies, three-dimensional organ-like structures. We analyzed STRIPAK subunit PP2Ac1, catalytic subunit 1 of protein phosphatase PP2A, to study the importance of the catalytic activity of this protein during sexual development. The results of our yeast two-hybrid analysis and tandem affinity purification, followed by mass spectrometry, indicate that PP2Ac1 activity connects STRIPAK with other signaling pathways and thus forms a large interconnected signaling network.
INTRODUCTION
Reversible protein phosphorylations are among the most common posttranslational modifications (1) that are involved in various signaling pathways controlling a multitude of different processes, such as cell proliferation and sexual propagation (2, 3). Kinases and phosphatases regulate protein phosphorylation mostly on serine (S) and threonine (T) residues and less frequently on tyrosine (Y) residues. In mammals, up to 400 kinases exist, while lower eukaryotes, such as filamentous fungi, possess about 100 kinases (4, 5). Kinases are classified into families based on substrate specificity and domain structure (6).
The number of phosphatases is similar to the number of kinases. However, significantly fewer phosphatase genes than kinase genes exist, since phosphatase diversity is based on the multimeric nature of most protein phosphatases. For example, major and highly abundant S/T protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) is a heterotrimeric protein phosphatase. A scaffolding subunit (PP2AA) and a catalytic subunit (PP2Ac) form a core complex, which is joined by a B-type regulatory subunit to complete the functional holoenzyme. The PP2A core complex is well conserved, and mammalian cells contain two isoforms each of PP2AA and PP2Ac (7). In fungi, PP2AA is encoded by a single gene, while two genes exist for PP2Ac isoforms that control developmental processes such as vegetative growth, hyphal fusion, virulence, and asexual and sexual propagation (8–11).
Regulatory PP2A subunits mediate substrate specificity and are classified into four families, called B, B′, B′′, and B′′′. Although members of these protein families within a single species show rather low sequence similarity, homologs of a given family are well conserved from yeasts to humans. The B′′′ subunits are the latest members of the regulatory subunits and are referred to as striatins (12). Striatins were initially detected in structures of the central nervous system, mostly in the striatum, and were the denominating subunits of the striatin-interacting phosphatase and kinase (STRIPAK) complex (13–15). Besides striatin, further subunits of STRIPAK are PP2AA and PP2Ac, striatin-interacting protein 1/2 (STRIP1/2), sarcolemmal membrane-associated protein (SLMAP), monopolar spindle-one-binder homolog 3 (Mob3), cerebral cavernous malformation 3 protein, and germinal-center-like kinases (15). STRIPAK coordinates key cellular processes such as cytoskeleton organization, cell migration, and cell size, as well as morphology control, in mammalians (15). In fungi, this complex regulates sexual and asexual development, hyphal fusion, and virulence (14, 15). Although the functions of STRIPAK complexes have been discovered in recent years, the molecular function of distinct subunits remains largely obscure.
We previously characterized the STRIPAK complex of the filamentous fungus Sordaria macrospora, which comprises, besides PP2AA, the striatin homolog PRO11, the STRIP1/2 homolog PRO22, the SLMAP homolog PRO45, the Mob3 homolog SmMOB3, and the germinal-center kinases SmKIN3 and SmKIN24 (14, 16). Previous evidence from protein-protein interaction studies indicated that catalytic subunit 1 of PP2A (PP2Ac1) is also part of fungal STRIPAK (17, 18). Therefore, the aim of this study was to functionally characterize PP2Ac1 in the filamentous fungus S. macrospora. We show that active PP2Ac1 is required for fruiting body formation, hyphal fusion, and vegetative growth. Genetic studies support the idea of a core STRIPAK complex comprising PP2A and the STRIP1/2 homolog PRO22, which plays a role in the septation of early reproductive structures. Finally, yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) analysis and tandem affinity purification (TAP)-mass spectrometry (MS) with PP2Ac1 as bait revealed that PP2Ac1 directly interacts with PRO22 and PP2AA. Our studies indicate that catalytically active PP2Ac1 is a major regulator of fungal sexual development and must be considered a key component of the fungal STRIPAK complex.
RESULTS
The pp2Ac1 gene governs fungal sexual development and hyphal fusion.
Previous TAP-MS data obtained with PRO22 as bait supported the idea that PP2Ac1 is part of the fungal STRIPAK complex (17) and stimulated our interest in its functional characterization. Annotation of the S. macrospora genome identified two genes encoding catalytic subunits 1 (PP2Ac1, SMAC_04678) and 2 (PP2Ac2, SMAC_04756) of PP2A. Both are highly homologous to their human homologs (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). We constructed pp2Ac1 and pp2Ac2 deletion mutants. We failed to generate a Δpp2Ac2 mutant, since the deletion is most probably lethal, as in other fungi (19–21). However, we successfully generated a Δpp2Ac1 strain, where pp2Ac1 is replaced with a hygromycin B resistance cassette. The deletion was confirmed by PCR analysis and Southern hybridization (see Fig. S2A to C in the supplemental material).
We analyzed the sexual development of the Δpp2Ac1 mutant strain in comparison to that of the wild type. The life cycle of S. macrospora is completed within 7 days. Starting from germinating sexual spores (ascospores), the fungus forms vegetative mycelium. Some hyphae differentiate into female gametangia, the ascogonia, which develop into immature fruiting bodies (protoperithecia) and then into pear-shaped fruiting bodies called perithecia. They protect the sexual sporangia (asci), each containing eight ascospores (22). We observed that after growth for 2 to 7 days on BMM (biomalt and maize extract medium)-coated slides, the Δpp2Ac1 strain generates small protoperithecia but never pigmented protoperithecia or perithecia (Fig. 1A). This phenotype of the Δpp2Ac1 mutant strain resembles the previously described pro phenotype, which has also been described in strains lacking genes for STRIPAK subunits (14). When we transformed the deletion strain with the wild-type pp2Ac1 gene controlled by its own promoter, we observed restoration of sexual development (Fig. 1A). Fertility was also regained after the transformation of a recombinant gene encoding an N-terminal fusion of the TAP tag to PP2Ac1 (ntap-pp2Ac1) (Fig. 1A). The number of perithecia in the NTAP-PP2Ac1 strain is lower than that in the wild type (see Fig. S2D in the supplemental material). However, strains remained sterile when we used a construct for C-terminally tagged PP2Ac1 (data not shown).
We and others observed previously that STRIPAK mutants have defects in both sexual development and hyphal fusion (14). Thus, we analyzed hyphal fusion in vegetative mycelium of the wild-type and Δpp2Ac1 mutant strains. Unlike the wild type, which frequently formed hyphal fusion bridges, the deletion strain was unable to undergo hyphal fusion (Fig. 1B). Reintroduction of the wild-type gene with its own promoter into the Δpp2Ac1 strain rescued the mutant phenotype. However, we were unable to show hyphal fusion in the Δpp2Ac1 strain containing overexpressed ntap-pp2Ac1.
PP2Ac1 is required for ascogonial septation.
Previously, aseptate ascogonia were described as being a unique feature of mutant pro22 (23). Here, we observed the same phenotype in the Δpp2Ac1 deletion strain (Fig. 2). This observation indicates that PRO22 and PP2Ac1 have a mutual function in the same signaling pathway that is distinct from STRIPAK signaling. To test this hypothesis, crosses were performed to generate a Δpp2Ac1 Δpro22 double deletion strain (see Fig. S3A in the supplemental material). The corresponding homokaryotic isolates were defective in sexual development and hyphal fusion, and the wild-type phenotype was restored by transformation of the double deletion strain with both wild-type genes (Fig. 1A and B). To quantify septum formation in ascogonial coils of the Δpp2Ac1, Δpro22, and Δpp2Ac1 Δpro22 strains compared to that in the wild type (Fig. 2), ascogonial septa were visualized by staining the cell wall with Calcofluor White M2R (CFW; Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, United States) (23). Screening of 200 ascogonia of each strain showed that intercalary septa occurred only in the wild type (Fig. 2), where all ascogonia showed septation.
Vegetative and stress-related growth is governed by STRIPAK subunits.
Mutations in many developmental genes have been linked to delayed vegetative and stress-related growth (24, 25). We compared the vegetative growth rates of the wild-type and Δpp2Ac1, Δpro22, and Δpp2Ac1 Δpro22 mutant strains. While the wild type grows approximately 41 mm/day, both single deletion strains exhibited a significantly reduced growth rate of about 17 mm/day. This reduction was even more severe in the double deletion strain, which grew only 13.4 mm/day (Fig. 3A). We tested different growth conditions to trigger endoplasmic reticulum (ER), oxidative, cell wall, and osmotic stresses. Only osmotic stress, induced by high sugar concentrations, and cell wall stress caused a significant growth defect in the deletion strains (Fig. 3B), while all of the other conditions tested revealed no defect (see Fig. S3C in the supplemental material). In comparison to the Δpro22 and Δpp2Ac1 mutant strains, the double deletion strain exhibited a similar sensitivity to osmotic stress, while cell wall stress-related growth was slightly restored in the Δpp2Ac1 Δpro22 strain (Fig. 3B). Thus, the double deletion strain partially bypasses the cell wall stress-sensitive phenotype of the single deletion strains. Once again, the mutants regained wild-type-like growth rates after transformation with the corresponding wild-type genes (Fig. 3A and B).
Defining the interaction network of PP2Ac1.
Previously, we described the STRIPAK complex of S. macrospora by TAP-MS with the STRIP1/2 homolog PRO22 as bait (17). This approach identified PP2Ac1 as a putative STRIPAK subunit. Here, we studied the interaction network of PP2Ac1 by using TAP-MS in a similar approach. For this purpose, we constructed the Δpp2Ac1::ntap-pp2Ac1 strain, which is fertile and thus confirms the functionality of the ntap-pp2Ac1 fusion gene in this developmental process (Fig. 1A). We identified more than 350 proteins in four TAP-MS experiments (see Dataset S1 in the supplemental material). We found 315 proteins in total and obtained putative interaction partners of PP2Ac1 by subtracting the unspecific background from several TAP-MS and affinity purification (AP)-MS experiments (25) and eliminating ribosomal proteins. Eight proteins were found in at least three experiments with a minimum mean of five spectral counts (Table 1). The protein identified with the highest number of spectral counts, besides PP2Ac1, was PRO22 (SMAC_02580). In all of our experiments, we found two regulators of PP2Ac1 in high abundance, called two A phosphatase-associated protein 42 (TAP42; SMAC_00948) and protein phosphatase two A phosphatase activator 1 (PTPA1; SMAC_03446). Furthermore, we identified a protein probably involved in RNA polymerase II degradation (SMAC_00817), a putative poly(A) RNA binding protein (SMAC_02147), and two proteins of unknown function (SMAC_00681, SMAC_08770).
TABLE 1 .
S. macrospora identifier |
Protein | Function | Spectral count (peptide count) |
Ø MS1-4 PSMsa | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MS1 | MS2 | MS3 | MS4 | ||||
SMAC_04678 | PP2Ac1 | Catalytic subunit of PP2A | 34 (7) | 55 (7) | 325 (16) | 125 (6) | 134.75 |
SMAC_02580 | PRO22 | Developmental protein | 84 (25) | 51 (20) | 174 (45) | 6 (6) | 78.75 |
SMAC_03446 | PTPA1 | PP2A activator | 32 (16) | 14 (12) | 75 (23) | 9 (9) | 32.5 |
SMAC_00948 | TAP42 | Associated with PP2A | 28 (9) | 20 (8) | 36 (14) | 4 (3) | 22 |
SMAC_00817 | DEF | RNA polymerase II degradation | 14 (7) | 7 (6) | 17 (10) | 8 (5) | 11.5 |
SMAC_02147 | PUB1 | Poly(A) RNA binding | 7 (4) | 3 (2) | 8 (4) | 2 (2) | 5 |
SMAC_00681 | Hypothetical | 4 (4) | 4 (4) | 17 (12) | 6.25 | ||
SMAC_08770 | Hypothetical | 4 (4) | 2 (2) | 16 (11) | 5.5 |
MS1 to MS4, mass spectrometry runs 1 to 4, respectively; Ø, average value; PSMs, peptide spectral matches (spectral counts).
We analyzed our TAP-MS data for signaling proteins that did not fit the above-mentioned criteria. The PP2A scaffold protein PP2AA (SMAC_01919) and the B-type regulatory subunit of PP2A, CDC55 (SMAC_04241) were identified in two experiments and one experiment, respectively. Furthermore, we detected the scaffold protein for the cell wall integrity (CWI) mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway, PRO40 (SMAC_04815), and the CWI pathway components RHO1 (SMAC_06239) (25) and GTPase-activating protein SAC7 (SMAC_02232), which is also a target of the target of rapamycin complex (TORC) (26). Moreover, we discovered protein kinase GSK-3 (SMAC_04408), which we identified previously in TAP-MS with PRO45 as bait (27). In addition, three putative methyltransferases (SMAC_09155, SMAC_06301, and SMAC_09840) that might be involved in posttranslational modification of PP2Ac1 were detected.
Y2H analysis indicates an interaction between STRIPAK and the CWI pathway.
Our TAP-MS data gave us an insight into the composition of the protein complex containing PP2Ac1. However, direct interactions within this complex remained elusive. The TAP-MS analysis presented here, together with previous TAP- and AP-MS analyses, emphasizes a putative connection between STRIPAK and the CWI pathway (17, 25). Similar to STRIPAK, the CWI pathway is also involved in sexual development, hyphal fusion, and vegetative, as well as stress-related, growth (25). Thus, we performed Y2H studies to investigate direct physical interactions between known STRIPAK subunits, putative regulators of PP2Ac1, and the MAPK kinase kinase MIK1, the MAPK kinase MEK1, and the MAPK MAK1, as well as the scaffold protein PRO40 of the CWI pathway. We analyzed the putative interaction partners PP2Ac1, TAP42, PTPA1, PRO22, PP2AA, SmMOB3, MIK1, MEK1, MAK1, PRO40, and epsin ENT1. Epsins in yeast interact with STRIPAK subunits and putatively link this signaling complex to endocytotic events (26). Mating of yeast strains PJ69-4a and PJ69-4α carrying Gal4 activation domain (AD) or DNA-binding domain (BD) fusions of the above-mentioned proteins resulted in diploid strains that were tested for growth (see Fig. S4 in the supplemental material) and reporter gene activity (Fig. 4A). PP2Ac1 physically interacts with STRIPAK subunits PP2AA and PRO22 and with its regulators PTPA1 and TAP42, with the latter forming a homodimer (Fig. 4A). PP2Ac1 showed interactions with all tested components of the CWI pathway. In addition, we identified several other direct interactions between STRIPAK and CWI pathway subunits (Fig. 4A), which emphasizes a link between both protein complexes. In detail, we confirmed putative protein-protein interactions between PRO22 and MAK1 and between PRO40 and PP2AA (Fig. 4A) that were identified by previous TAP- and AP-MS approaches (17, 25). Furthermore, MAK1 exhibited an interaction with TAP42 and ENT1 that was not described previously.
Since BD-PP2Ac1 and BD-PRO11 fusion proteins show transactivation, we tested the binding of PP2Ac1 to subfragments of PRO11, which is the homolog of mammalian striatin and thus the regulatory subunit of PP2A in STRIPAK. To determine the interaction sites of PRO22 and PP2AA that mediate binding to PP2Ac1, we used subfragments as displayed in Fig. 4B. Growth tests for reporter gene activity were performed with diploid yeast strains carrying fragments as indicated in Fig. 4C. We deduced that PP2Ac1 interacts with PRO22-PxxP and PRO22-TM2 but not with PRO22-T1, PRO22-T2/3, and PRO22-T3. PRO22-PxxP is full-length PRO22 with a mutation in the PxxP motif, which is supposed to mediate protein-protein interaction in large protein complexes (28), while PRO22-TM2 contains the N1221 domain, the PxxP domain, and a fragment of the conserved domain. In summary, the N1221 domain is involved in the interaction between PRO22 and PP2Ac1, while the conserved domain and the PxxP motif are not essential for this interaction (Fig. 4D). PP2Ac1 and PRO11 subfragments did not show a physical interaction, while PP2Ac1 and PP2AA-C, containing HEAT (huntingtin, elongation factor 3, PP2A, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae TOR1) repeats 8 to 12, interacted in the Y2H analysis.
We identified the CWI pathway components as interaction partners of STRIPAK subunits PP2Ac1 and PRO22. Thus, we analyzed the phosphorylation status of MAK1 in both deletion strains and the double deletion strain with an appropriate antibody. As shown in Fig. S5 in the supplemental material, the phosphorylation level of MAK1 is unchanged in the Δpp2Ac1 strain and slightly but not significantly higher in the Δpro22 and Δpp2Ac1 Δpro22 strains.
Catalytically active PP2Ac1 is required for sexual development.
Since the catalytic subunits of PP2A are highly conserved from fungi to humans (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material), putative residues comprising the active site of this enzyme are easily predictable. Thus, we were able to identify the active site of PP2Ac1. To study phosphatase activity, we generated a pp2Ac1 derivative with the highly conserved histidine replaced with a glutamine at position 59 (H59Q). Mammalian homolog proteins harboring the H59Q mutation in the active site were inactive in vitro (29, 30). As a further control, we constructed a pp2Ac1 derivative with a mutation at codon 50 encoding the nonconserved alanine (A50G). We purified glutathione S-transferase (GST)-PP2Ac1, GST-P2Ac1A50G, GST-PP2Ac1H59Q, and GST from Escherichia coli (Fig. 5A) and used the purified proteins in phosphatase activity tests with 6,8-difluoro-4-methylumbelliferyl phosphate (DiFMUP) as a substrate (Fig. 5B). GST-PP2Ac1 showed phosphatase activity with approximately 249 relative fluorescence units (RFU), while the activity of GST-PP2Ac1A50G was slightly reduced at 136 RFU and GST-PP2Ac1H59Q was impaired in phosphatase activity at only 20 RFU. GST alone did not show any phosphatase activity. To verify that the phosphatase activity detected resulted from PP2Ac1, the specific PP2A inhibitor okadaic acid was added to the reaction mixture (31). Okadaic acid reduced the phosphatase activity of GST-PP2Ac1, GST-PP2Ac1A50G, and GST-PP2Ac1H59Q by 71, 93, and 77%, respectively (Fig. 5B). These data indicate that PP2Ac1 is an active phosphatase in vitro and a subunit of PP2A.
Phosphatase activity is required for sexual development.
The results of in vitro phosphatase activity tests revealed that the conserved active site of PP2Ac1 is required for enzyme activity. To study the physiological effect of modified phosphatase activity on S. macrospora, constructs encoding PP2Ac1, PP2Ac1A50G, and PP2Ac1H59Q were used for comparative complementation studies with the Δpp2Ac1 strain as the recipient, with fully developed strains carrying the gene derivatives as indicated in Fig. 6A. While the Δpp2Ac1::egfp-pp2Ac1 and Δpp2Ac1::egfp-pp2Ac1A50G strains formed mature wild-type-like perithecia, the Δpp2Ac1::egfp-pp2Ac1H59Q strain generated only protoperithecia with few enveloping hyphae. The vegetative growth defect of the pp2Ac1 deletion strain was restored by reintroduction of the full-length wild-type gene and pp2Ac1A50G to approximately 66% of wild-type growth. In contrast, the introduction of pp2Ac1H59Q decreased the growth rate of the Δpp2Ac1 strain further by about 88% compared to that of the wild type (Fig. 6B).
DISCUSSION
PP2Ac1, the catalytic subunit of PP2A, is a core subunit of STRIPAK, a conserved eukaryotic complex. STRIPAK regulates different aspects of eukaryotic growth. In mammalian cells, it is involved in cytoskeleton organization, cell migration, and morphology control, while in filamentous fungi it controls sexual development, vegetative growth, and hyphal fusion (14, 15). The functional analysis and enzymatic characterization of PP2Ac1 provides a more mechanistic insight into the regulation of eukaryotic developmental processes. Moreover, the data presented strongly imply that cross talk between STRIPAK and other conserved eukaryotic regulatory complexes occurs.
The heterotrimeric phosphatase PP2A governs numerous fungal developmental processes.
The highly conserved protein phosphatase PP2A participates in a variety of cellular processes and was described as a kinase phosphatase (12). It comprises a scaffold (PP2A) and a catalytic subunit (PP2Ac) forming a core enzyme, which is joined by a regulatory subunit (PP2AB) to form a functional protein phosphatase. Either of two catalytic subunits provides PP2A phosphatase activity. By functionally characterizing the isoform PP2Ac1, we specified it as an important factor for fungal fruiting body formation, hyphal fusion, and vegetative, as well as stress-related, growth in S. macrospora. This agrees with findings on other filamentous fungi, where homologs of PP2Ac1 are involved in hyphal fusion, vegetative growth, and sexual and asexual development (9, 18, 21). The deletion of the pp2Ac1 gene results in a sterile S. macrospora strain generating ascogonial coils and unpigmented protoperithecia. This phenotype resembles the pro phenotype described previously for other STRIPAK deletion strains and other developmental mutants (reviewed in references 14 and 22). In the ascomycetes S. macrospora and Neurospora crassa, many of these developmental mutants are impaired in hyphal fusion (22, 32). The deletion of the N. crassa pp2Ac1 homolog led to a female sterile strain that also fails to form conidial anastomosis tubes (CATs), and shows reduced vegetative growth rates (18). CATs are specialized thin hyphae formed during conidial germination and mediate cell fusion at this developmental stage (32, 33). Reduced vegetative growth rates were also described for an Aspergillus nidulans pp2Ac1 deletion strain that shows a defect in asexual development and is sensitive to high glucose concentrations (21). This stress-related growth defect is also found in S. macrospora Δpp2Ac1, and we hypothesize that, similar to findings on S. cerevisiae and rat cell lines, large amounts of glucose activate PP2Ac1 (34, 35). Moreover, our complementation analysis with ntap-pp2Ac1 showed that sexual development and hyphal fusion are not necessarily linked (Fig. 1A and B). Since the native construct complements all of the defects of the deletion strain, the lack of hyphal fusion might be due to overexpression of ntap-pp2Ac1.
Until now, evidence for the phosphatase activity of PP2Ac1 in filamentous fungi was lacking. Our in vitro tests with the wild-type and mutant versions of PP2Ac1 indicate clearly that the purified enzyme has enzymatic activity. We used mutant PP2Ac1A50G as a positive control, since the A50G substitution affects a nonconserved residue. However, the catalytic mutant protein PP2Ac1H59Q showed strongly reduced phosphatase activity, concurring with mammalian homologs sharing the same mutation (29, 30). Residue 59 (H) is highly conserved from fungi to humans and is part of the first domain of the active site (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). Thus, PP2Ac1 needs an intact active site for phosphatase activity. We also verified that PP2Ac1 is a catalytic subunit of PP2A, since specific inhibition by okadaic acid is concentration dependent toward PP2A, PP1, and PP2B (31, 36). The importance of phosphatase activity was demonstrated by our in vivo experiments in that complementation with the wild type and the control mutant version led to fertile strains with better vegetative growth than the Δpp2Ac1 strain, while PP2Ac1H59Q was unable to restore sexual development and led to a more severe defect in vegetative growth (Fig. 5B). However, the control mutant version led to a reduced number of perithecia (see Fig. S2D in the supplemental material). In conclusion, PP2Ac1 is a phosphatase and its catalytic activity is essential for fungal sexual development and vegetative growth.
TAP-MS experiments with PP2Ac1 as bait identified additional subunits of PP2A, namely, PP2AA and CDC55. The genomes of both N. crassa and S. macrospora encode a single scaffold subunit of PP2A, PP2AA (37, 38). PP2AA is crucial for the viability of N. crassa, and homokaryotic ascospores of deletion mutants show apolar germination, followed by instant lysis (18). Similarly, deletion of PP2Ac2 is lethal to filamentous fungi, including S. macrospora (19–21). B regulatory subunit CDC55 in A. nidulans is involved in asexual and sexual development and septation (39), and thus, CDC55 and PP2Ac1 might form a trimeric enzyme with PP2AA to regulate septation in ascogonial coils of S. macrospora. The regulatory PP2A subunit found in the core STRIPAK complex is striatin, the B′′′ regulatory subunit of PP2A (14). Striatins are structurally and functionally conserved in eukaryotes and govern sexual development and pathogenicity in ascomycetes (14, 40). It has been reported that striatin homologs of animals and yeasts directly interact with PP2A catalytic subunits (15). However, we were unable to show the interaction of PP2Ac1 and the striatin homolog PRO11 by TAP-MS or Y2H analysis. Unlike in N. crassa, where the interaction of the PRO11 and PP2Ac1 homologs was already detected by single-step purification (18), we used a TAP-MS analysis that provides specific results but often fails to identify more-transient interactions. Furthermore, the transactivation of both pB-pp2Ac1 and pB-pro11 precludes Y2H analysis with both full-length constructs. Data from mammalian cell lines indicate that PP2AA and PP2Ac bind to the coiled-coil domains of striatins (41, 42). Together with the findings on N. crassa, these data indicate that binding between PP2Ac1 and PRO11 might depend on PP2AA.
PP2Ac1 links STRIPAK to other developmental signaling pathways.
Many signaling pathways form interconnected networks that enable feedback loops and fine-tuned cross talk to control developmental processes. For STRIPAK, cross talk with the Erk pathway in insects and mammals exists (42). In Drosophila, the dSTRIPAK complex is important for the negative regulation of several protein kinase pathways, and STRIPAK-associated PP2A is apparently a key regulator of these processes (15).
Our Y2H and TAP-MS analyses indicate a connection between the STRIPAK complex and other developmental signaling pathways in fungi (Fig. 7A to D). We identified direct interactions between STRIPAK subunits PP2Ac1, PRO22, and PP2AA and subunits MIK1, MEK1, MAK1, and PRO40 of the CWI pathway (Fig. 4C and D). Our previous TAP- and AP-MS results already suggested a connection between these complexes (17, 25). The hypothesis of cross talk between STRIPAK and the CWI pathway is supported by findings on mammals and S. cerevisiae, where PP2A is supposedly a negative regulator of CWI pathway signaling (43, 44). Similarly, STRIPAK probably regulates MAPK signaling in filamentous fungi. In N. crassa, STRIPAK subunits affect the nuclear accumulation of the MAPK MAK-1 in conjunction with MAK-2, which suggests feedback loops between the STRIPAK and MAPK cascades (18). Our data, together with reports on different yeasts, further suggest that STRIPAK has strong links to the evolutionarily conserved signaling complexes target of rapamycin complex (TORC) and the septation initiation network (SIN) (Fig. 7A to C). TORC exists as a rapamycin-sensitive or -insensitive complex containing S/T protein kinase TOR1 or -2, as well as different sets of subunits (45), and regulates nutrient sensing, growth, metabolism, and aging (46, 47). In S. cerevisiae, where the STRIPAK-like complex is called the factor arrest (FAR) complex and controls cell cycle arrest during mating, the FAR complex negatively regulates the TORC2 signaling network (26, 48–50). In our TAP-MS analysis, we found evidence of a link between PP2Ac1 and GTPase-activating protein SAC7, a signaling component of the CWI and TORC2 pathways in S. cerevisiae (26, 51, 52). The physical interaction between PP2Ac1 and TAP42 is a further hint at the link between STRIPAK and TORC (Fig. 7B and C). The S. cerevisiae homolog of TAP42 forms a complex with PP2Ac independently of PP2AA and PP2AB and is a target of the TORC signaling pathway, and deletion of the pp2Ac1-like gene for PPG1 suppresses mutant alleles of TORC (50, 53, 54).
Previously published data on S. macrospora and Schizosaccharomyces pombe already underlined the connection between STRIPAK and the SIN (27, 55). Specifically, PRO45 and its S. pombe homolog Csc1 link the STRIPAK complex to the SIN in both fungi (Fig. 7A and C). In S. pombe, the STRIPAK-like complex antagonizes the SIN and was therefore called the SIN-inhibitory PP2A complex (55). In this yeast, the SIN is crucial for cytokinesis and septum formation, and asymmetry of SIN components indicates active SIN signaling during mitosis (56). The S. macrospora Δpp2Ac1, Δpro22, and Δpp2Ac1 Δpro22 deletion strains lack intercalary septa in ascogonial coils, indicating a development-specific dysregulation of the SIN in these STRIPAK mutants (Fig. 7). The structure of septa in ascogonia may vary from the septal structure in vegetative mycelium, which was shown in Sordaria humana (57). Intercalary septation in ascogonial coils might be essential for spatial separation or accumulation of signaling molecules in ascogenous hyphae during sexual development and may provide a link to the dikaryotic state preceding meiosis (23, 57). Septae with different molecular functions and compositions were described recently in N. crassa, where several septal pore-associated proteins show development-dependent localization to septal pores (58). Moreover, insights into the phosphorylation status of STRIPAK subunits will greatly increase our mechanistic understanding of phosphosignaling in eukaryotes.
In conclusion, our findings show that the catalytic activity of STRIPAK subunit PP2Ac1 is required for fungal fruiting body formation. Our interaction studies indicate that PP2Ac1 mediates cross talk between STRIPAK and other key regulatory complexes involved in nutrient signaling, CWI, and cytokinesis (Fig. 7A to D). Such information may be useful for understanding cellular development in general in higher eukaryotes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Strains and growth conditions.
E. coli XL1-Blue MRF′ (59), NEB5α (NEB), and TOP10 (IBA) were used for the propagation of recombinant plasmids under standard laboratory conditions (60). Recombinant proteins were expressed in E. coli BL21(DE3) (Stratagene) (61). Alternative plasmid construction and Y2H analysis were performed with S. cerevisiae PJ69-4a and PJ69-4α (62) as previously described (17, 63). The yeast strains were cultivated according to standard protocols; transgenic yeast strains were selected by prototrophy to leucine, tryptophan, or uracil; and corresponding experiments were carried out according to standard protocols (64).
The S. macrospora strains used in this study are listed in Table S1 in the supplemental material. Unless otherwise described, standard growth conditions, isolation of genomic DNA, and DNA-mediated transformation were performed as described previously (65, 66). The transformants were selected on nourseothricin (50 mg/ml)- and/or hygromycin B (80 U/ml)-containing medium. Growth tests in race tubes were performed for 7 days with 20 ml of SWG medium, SWG medium containing 250 µg/ml CFW, and SWG medium containing 0.6 M glucose as described before (25). Growth tests in petri dishes were carried out with 20 ml of SWG medium containing 0.6 M sorbitol, 0.6 M NaCl, 0.01% H2O2, or 100 mM dithiothreitol (DTT). For each experiment, three dishes were inoculated with an 8-mm-diameter agar plug and incubated for 2 to 3 days. The growth front was marked every 24 h (see Fig. S3C in the supplemental material).
Generation of a pp2Ac1 deletion strain and a pp2Ac1pro22 double deletion strain.
To generate a Δpp2Ac1 strain, linearized pKO-pp2Ac1 was transformed into a Δku70 strain (67). Details of plasmid construction are shown in Text S1 in the supplemental material. The primary transformants were selected for hygromycin resistance and subsequently verified by PCR (data not shown). Ascospore isolates of the Δpp2Ac1 strain with the wild-type genetic background were obtained by crosses against the spore color mutant fus as described elsewhere (68, 69) and verified by PCR and Southern blot analysis (see Fig. S3B and C in the supplemental material). The oligonucleotides used in this work are listed in Table S2 in the supplemental material. For a pp2Ac1 pro22 double deletion strain, Δpro22 was crossed against a spore color mutant, Δpp2Ac1::natp-pp2Ac1/fus. Ascospore isolates were selected for hygromycin B resistance and nourseothricin sensitivity to obtain strains with a wild-type genetic background (Fig. S3A). Strains were verified by PCR analysis (see Fig. S3B in the supplemental material).
Production and purification of recombinant proteins.
Plasmid construction is described in Text S1 in the supplemental material. Plasmids for high expression of recombinant genes were transformed into E. coli BL21(DE3). E. coli strains were grown in LB liquid culture with ampicillin for selection while shaking at 280 rpm and 37°C until reaching an optical density at 600 nm of 0.5 to 0.6, when overexpression was induced with 100 ng/ml anhydrotetracycline for 1 h at 280 rpm and 37°C. Overexpression of the GST gene was performed with plasmid pGEX-4T-1 as previously described (70). Cells were harvested and disrupted by sonication, followed by centrifugation to clear the soluble fraction, which was subjected to SDS-PAGE and AP as described previously (70). Purification was performed with glutathione Sepharose 4 Fast Flow (GE Healthcare Life Science, Freiburg, Germany) affinity medium as previously described (70), with minor modifications during washing. The first washing step was performed in batches, and the three following washing steps were performed on a column. The elution buffer contained 30 µM glutathione and 100 mM NaCl. Elutions were concentrated, and the buffer was exchanged against 100 mM Tris/Cl, pH 8.
TAP-MS.
For TAP, the above-mentioned Δpp2Ac1::ntap-pp2Ac1 strain (A1572) was generated and analyzed for production of NTAP-PP2Ac1 by Western blotting as previously described (17). The strain was precultured in liquid BMM for 2 days and cultured for 3 days at 27°C in 12 P-flasks containing BMM, and protein extraction and TAP were performed as described previously (17). Tobacco etch virus protease cleavage was performed with AcTEV (Novex). Tryptic digestion, multidimensional protein identification technology MS, and peptide identification were performed with four replicates as described elsewhere (17).
Y2H analysis.
The Y2H plasmids used in this study are listed in Table S3 in the supplemental material, and plasmid generation is described in Text S1 in the supplemental material. Haploid strains were generated by electroporation or chemical transformation (71, 72). PJ69-4α and PJ69-4a containing pGBKT7 and pGADT7 derivatives, respectively, were mated to generate diploid strains as previously described (73). Strains were plated on medium lacking leucine and tryptophan or leucine and uracil to analyze growth. Reporter gene activity was analyzed on medium lacking leucine, tryptophan/uracil, adenine, and histidine. Drop plating assays were performed as previously described (25). Constructs showing transactivation were omitted from the analysis; these were pB-pp2Ac1, pB-pro11, pB-Smmob3, and pB-ENT1. We tested pGBKT7 derivatives with pA-Δn-ranbpm, since the fusion protein Gal4-AD–RanBPM activates reporter gene expression with every functional Gal4 BD fusion protein (74).
Microscopic investigations.
Microscopic investigations were performed with an AxioImager microscope (Zeiss, Jena, Germany). Sexual development and hyphal fusion were documented by differential interference contrast (DIC) microscopy with strains inoculated onto BMM-coated glass slides for 2 to 7 days or after 2 days on cellophane-covered MMS dishes, respectively (75). Fluorescence microscopy was carried out with an XBO75 xenon lamp (LEJ, Jena, Germany). For fluorescence microscopy, strains were grown on BMM-coated glass slides for 2 to 3 days (68). Fluorescence was observed with filter set 31000v2 (ET560/40x, ET630/75m, T585lp) for CFW M2R (Sigma-Aldrich).
Phosphatase activity measurements.
The phosphatase activity of purified recombinant proteins was measured in a phosphatase activity assay with DiFMUP as the substrate (76, 77). This substrate can be dephosphorylated by a phosphatase, producing the fluorescent product 6,8-difluoro-7-hydroxy-4-methylcoumarin, showing excitation and emission maxima at approximately 358 and 450 nm (76). Thus, fluorescence intensity corresponds to the phosphatase activity of the protein tested and was measured in RFU with a fluorometer (TKO 100; Hoefer). For each sample, 1 µg of protein was used with 600 µl of buffer containing 83.3 µM difluoro-4-methylumbelliferyl phosphate (DiFMUP), 50 mM Tris (pH 8.0), 8 mM MnCl2, and 0.05% (wt/vol) acetylated bovine serum albumin. The reaction was performed three times in triplicate for 60 min at 30°C in the dark. Fluorescence measurements were taken after the addition of 1.9 ml of distilled water. To verify that fluorescence was due to a dephosphorylation reaction by PP2Ac1, we performed two inhibitor experiments, each in triplicate, with 5 nM okadaic acid added to the reaction mixtures or with the GST tag alone.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank S. Schlewinski, R. Ricke, K. Kalkreuter, and I. Godehardt for their excellent technical support; A. Birk and M. Lutomski for their help with some of the experiments; and G. Frenßen-Schenkel for the assistance with graphical work. We acknowledge S. Fields (Seattle, WA) for the gift of yeast strains PJ69-4a and PJ69-4α.
This study was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Bonn, Germany) (PAK489, KU517/11-2). The funding agency was not involved in designing the experiments, conducting the work, generating and analyzing the data, or the decision to write this paper and submit it for publication.
Footnotes
Citation Beier A, Teichert I, Krisp C, Wolters DA, Kück U. 2016. Catalytic subunit 1 of protein phosphatase 2A is a subunit of the STRIPAK complex and governs fungal sexual development. mBio 7(3):e00870-16. doi:10.1128/mBio.00870-16.
REFERENCES
- 1.Boekhorst J, van Breukelen B, Heck A Jr, Snel B. 2008. Comparative phosphoproteomics reveals evolutionary and functional conservation of phosphorylation across eukaryotes. Genome Biol 9:R144. doi: 10.1186/gb-2008-9-10-r144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Farrell JA, O’Farrell PH. 2014. From egg to gastrula: how the cell cycle is remodeled during the Drosophila mid-blastula transition. Annu Rev Genet 48:269–294. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-111212-133531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Grallert A, Boke E, Hagting A, Hodgson B, Connolly Y, Griffiths JR, Smith DL, Pines J, Hagan IM. 2015. A PP1-PP2A phosphatase relay controls mitotic progression. Nature 517:94–98. doi: 10.1038/nature14019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Park G, Servin JA, Turner GE, Altamirano L, Colot HV, Collopy P, Litvinkova L, Li L, Jones CA, Diala FG, Dunlap JC, Borkovich KA. 2011. Global analysis of serine–threonine protein kinase genes in Neurospora crassa. Eukaryot Cell 10:1553–1564. doi: 10.1128/EC.05140-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.De Souza CP, Hashmi SB, Osmani AH, Andrews P, Ringelberg CS, Dunlap JC, Osmani SA. 2013. Functional analysis of the Aspergillus nidulans kinome. PLoS One 8:e58008. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Manning G, Whyte DB, Martinez R, Hunter T, Sudarsanam S. 2002. The protein kinase complement of the human genome. Science 298:1912–1934. doi: 10.1126/science.1075762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Janssens V, Longin S, Goris J. 2008. PP2A holoenzyme assembly: in cauda venenum (the sting is in the tail). Trends Biochem Sci 33:113–121. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2007.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kosmidou E, Lunness P, Doonan JH. 2001. A type 2A protein phosphatase gene from Aspergillus nidulans is involved in hyphal morphogenesis. Curr Genet 39:25–34. doi: 10.1007/s002940000177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Fu C, Iyer P, Herkal A, Abdullah J, Stout A, Free SJ. 2011. Identification and characterization of genes required for cell-to-cell fusion in Neurospora crassa. Eukaryot Cell 10:1100–1109. doi: 10.1128/EC.05003-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Erental A, Harel A, Yarden O. 2007. Type 2A phosphoprotein phosphatase is required for asexual development and pathogenesis of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 20:944–954. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-20-8-0944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Yatzkan E, Szöor B, Fehér Z, Dombrádi V, Yarden O. 1998. Protein phosphatase 2A is involved in hyphal growth of Neurospora crassa. Mol Gen Genet 259:523–531. doi: 10.1007/s004380050844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Janssens V, Goris J. 2001. Protein phosphatase 2A: a highly regulated family of serine/threonine phosphatases implicated in cell growth and signalling. Biochem J 353:417–439. doi: 10.1042/bj3530417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Castets F, Bartoli M, Barnier JV, Baillat G, Salin P, Moqrich A, Bourgeois JP, Denizot F, Rougon G, Calothy G, Monneron A. 1996. A novel calmodulin-binding protein, belonging to the WD-repeat family, is localized in dendrites of a subset of CNS neurons. J Cell Biol 134:1051–1062. doi: 10.1083/jcb.134.4.1051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kück U, Beier AM, Teichert I. 2016. The composition and function of the striatin-interacting phosphatases and kinases (STRIPAK) complex in fungi. Fungal Genet Biol 90:31–38. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2015.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hwang J, Pallas DC. 2014. STRIPAK complexes: structure, biological function, and involvement in human diseases. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 47:118–148. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2013.11.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Frey S, Reschka EJ, Pöggeler S. 2015. Germinal center kinases SmKIN3 and SmKIN24 are associated with the Sordaria macrospora striatin-interacting phosphatase and kinase (STRIPAK) complex. PLoS One 10:e0139163. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Bloemendal S, Bernhards Y, Bartho K, Dettmann A, Voigt O, Teichert I, Seiler S, Wolters DA, Pöggeler S, Kück U. 2012. A homologue of the human STRIPAK complex controls sexual development in fungi. Mol Microbiol 84:310–323. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2012.08024.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Dettmann A, Heilig Y, Ludwig S, Schmitt K, Illgen J, Fleißner A, Valerius O, Seiler S. 2013. HAM-2 and HAM-3 are central for the assembly of the Neurospora STRIPAK complex at the nuclear envelope and regulate nuclear accumulation of the MAP kinase MAK-1 in a MAK-2-dependent manner. Mol Microbiol 90:796–812. doi: 10.1111/mmi.12399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Yatzkan E, Yarden O. 1995. Inactivation of a single-2A phosphoprotein phosphatase is lethal in Neurospora crassa. Curr Genet 28:458–466. doi: 10.1007/BF00310816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Egan JD, García-Pedrajas MD, Andrews DL, Gold SE. 2009. Calcineurin is an antagonist to PKA protein phosphorylation required for postmating filamentation and virulence, while PP2A is required for viability in Ustilago maydis. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 22:1293–1301. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-22-10-1293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Son S, Osmani SA. 2009. Analysis of all protein phosphatase genes in Aspergillus nidulans identifies a new mitotic regulator, Fcp1. Eukaryot Cell 8:573–585. doi: 10.1128/EC.00346-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Teichert I, Nowrousian M, Pöggeler S, Kück U. 2014. The filamentous fungus Sordaria macrospora as a genetic model to study fruiting body development. Adv Genet 87:199–244. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-800149-3.00004-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Bloemendal S, Lord KM, Rech C, Hoff B, Engh I, Read ND, Kück U. 2010. A mutant defective in sexual development produces aseptate ascogonia. Eukaryot Cell 9:1856–1866. doi: 10.1128/EC.00186-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Bernhards Y, Pöggeler S. 2011. The phocein homologue SmMOB3 is essential for vegetative cell fusion and sexual development in the filamentous ascomycete Sordaria macrospora. Curr Genet 57:133–149. doi: 10.1007/s00294-010-0333-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Teichert I, Steffens EK, Schnaß N, Fränzel B, Krisp C, Wolters DA, Kück U. 2014. PRO40 is a scaffold protein of the cell wall integrity pathway, linking the MAP kinase module to the upstream activator protein kinase C. PLoS Genet 10:e1004582. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Pracheil T, Thornton J, Liu Z. 2012. TORC2 signaling is antagonized by protein phosphatase 2A and the Far complex in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 190:1325–1339. doi: 10.1534/genetics.111.138305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Nordzieke S, Zobel T, Fränzel B, Wolters DA, Kück U, Teichert I. 2015. A fungal sarcolemmal membrane-associated protein (SLMAP) homolog plays a fundamental role in development and localizes to the nuclear envelope, ER, and mitochondria. Eukaryot Cell 14:345–358 doi: 10.1128/EC.00241-14:345-358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ravi Chandra B, Gowthaman R, Akhouri RR, Gupta D, Sharma A. 2004. Distribution of proline-rich (PxxP) motifs in distinct proteomes: functional and therapeutic implications for malaria and tuberculosis. Protein Eng Des Sel 17:175–182. doi: 10.1093/protein/gzh024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ogris E, Du X, Nelson KC, Mak EK, Yu XX, Lane WS, Pallas DC. 1999. A protein phosphatase methylesterase (PME-1) is one of several novel proteins stably associating with two inactive mutants of protein phosphatase 2A. J Biol Chem 274:14382–14391. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.20.14382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Yu XX, Du X, Moreno CS, Green RE, Ogris E, Feng Q, Chou L, McQuoid MJ, Pallas DC. 2001. Methylation of the protein phosphatase 2A catalytic subunit is essential for association of Balpha regulatory subunit but not SG2NA, striatin, or polyomavirus middle tumor antigen. Mol Biol Cell 12:185–199. doi: 10.1091/mbc.12.1.185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Cohen P, Klumpp S, Schelling DL. 1989. An improved procedure for identifying and quantitating protein phosphatases in mammalian tissues. FEBS Lett 250:596–600. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(89)80803-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Herzog S, Schumann MR, Fleißner A. 2015. Cell fusion in Neurospora crassa. Curr Opin Microbiol 28:53–59. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2015.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Roca MG, Arlt J, Jeffree CE, Read ND. 2005. Cell biology of conidial anastomosis tubes in Neurospora crassa. Eukaryot Cell 4:911–919. doi: 10.1128/EC.4.5.911-919.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Castermans D, Somers I, Kriel J, Louwet W, Wera S, Versele M, Janssens V, Thevelein JM. 2012. Glucose-induced posttranslational activation of protein phosphatases PP2A and PP1 in yeast. Cell Res 22:1058–1077. doi: 10.1038/cr.2012.20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Arora DK, Machhadieh B, Matti A, Wadzinski BE, Ramanadham S, Kowluru A. 2014. High glucose exposure promotes activation of protein phosphatase 2A in rodent islets and INS-1 832/13 beta-cells by increasing the posttranslational carboxylmethylation of its catalytic subunit. Endocrinology 155:380–391. doi: 10.1210/en.2013-1773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Bialojan C, Takai A. 1988. Inhibitory effect of a marine-sponge toxin, okadaic acid, on protein phosphatases. Specificity and kinetics. Biochem J 256:283–290. doi: 10.1042/bj2560283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Teichert I, Wolff G, Kück U, Nowrousian M. 2012. Combining laser microdissection and RNA-seq to chart the transcriptional landscape of fungal development. BMC Genomics 13:511. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Galagan JE, Calvo SE, Borkovich KA, Selker EU, Read ND, Jaffe D, FitzHugh W, Ma LJ, Smirnov S, Purcell S, Rehman B, Elkins T, Engels R, Wang S, Nielsen CB, Butler J, Endrizzi M, Qui D, Ianakiev P, Bell-Pedersen D, Nelson MA, Werner-Washburne M, Selitrennikoff CP, Kinsey JA, Braun EL, Zelter A, Schulte U, Kothe GO, Jedd G, Mewes W, Staben C, Marcotte E, Greenberg D, Roy A, Foley K, Naylor J, Stange-Thomann N, Barrett R, Gnerre S, Kamal M, Kamvysselis M, Mauceli E, Bielke C, Rudd S, Frishman D, Krystofova S, Rasmussen C, Metzenberg RL, Perkins DD, Kroken S, et al.. 2003. The genome sequence of the filamentous fungus Neurospora crassa. Nature 422:859–868. doi: 10.1038/nature01554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Zhong GW, Jiang P, Qiao WR, Zhang YW, Wei WF, Lu L. 2014. Protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) regulatory subunits ParA and PabA orchestrate septation and conidiation and are essential for PP2A activity in Aspergillus nidulans. Eukaryot Cell 13:1494–1506. doi: 10.1128/EC.00201-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Shim WB, Sagaram US, Choi YE, So J, Wilkinson HH, Lee YW. 2006. FSR1 is essential for virulence and female fertility in Fusarium verticillioides and F. graminearum. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 19:725–733. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-19-0725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Chen C, Shi Z, Zhang W, Chen M, He F, Zhang Z, Wang Y, Feng M, Wang W, Zhao Y, Brown JH, Jiao S, Zhou Z. 2014. Striatins contain a noncanonical coiled coil that binds protein phosphatase 2A A subunit to form a 2:2 heterotetrameric core of striatin-interacting phosphatase and kinase (STRIPAK) complex. J Biol Chem 289:9651–9661. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.529297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Gordon J, Hwang J, Carrier KJ, Jones CA, Kern QL, Moreno CS, Karas RH, Pallas DC. 2011. Protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) binds within the oligomerization domain of striatin and regulates the phosphorylation and activation of the mammalian Ste20-like kinase Mst3. BMC Biochem 12:54. doi: 10.1186/1471-2091-12-54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Junttila MR, Li SP, Westermarck J. 2008. Phosphatase-mediated crosstalk between MAPK signaling pathways in the regulation of cell survival. FASEB J 22:954–965. doi: 10.1096/fj.06-7859rev. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Sacristán-Reviriego A, Martín H, Molina M. 2015. Identification of putative negative regulators of yeast signaling through a screening for protein phosphatases acting on cell wall integrity and mating MAPK pathways. Fungal Genet Biol 77:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2015.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Loewith R, Jacinto E, Wullschleger S, Lorberg A, Crespo JL, Bonenfant D, Oppliger W, Jenoe P, Hall MN. 2002. Two TOR complexes, only one of which is rapamycin sensitive, have distinct roles in cell growth control. Mol Cell 10:457–468. doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00636-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Loewith R, Hall MN. 2011. Target of rapamycin (TOR) in nutrient signaling and growth control. Genetics 189:1177–1201. doi: 10.1534/genetics.111.133363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Cornu M, Albert V, Hall MN. 2013. mTOR in aging, metabolism, and cancer. Curr Opin Genet Dev 23:53–62. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2012.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Kemp HA, Sprague GF Jr.. 2003. Far3 and five interacting proteins prevent premature recovery from pheromone arrest in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 23:1750–1763. doi: 10.1128/MCB.23.5.1750-1763.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Goudreault M, D’Ambrosio LM, Kean MJ, Mullin MJ, Larsen BG, Sanchez A, Chaudhry S, Chen GI, Sicheri F, Nesvizhskii AI, Aebersold R, Raught B, Gingras AC. 2009. A PP2A phosphatase high density interaction network identifies a novel striatin-interacting phosphatase and kinase complex linked to the cerebral cavernous malformation 3 (CCM3) protein. Mol Cell Proteomics 8:157–171. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M800266-MCP200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Baryshnikova A, Costanzo M, Kim Y, Ding H, Koh J, Toufighi K, Youn JY, Ou J, San Luis BJ, Bandyopadhyay S, Hibbs M, Hess D, Gingras AC, Bader GD, Troyanskaya OG, Brown GW, Andrews B, Boone C, Myers CL. 2010. Quantitative analysis of fitness and genetic interactions in yeast on a genome scale. Nat Methods 7:1017–1024. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Bickle M, Delley PA, Schmidt A, Hall MN. 1998. Cell wall integrity modulates RHO1 activity via the exchange factor ROM2. EMBO J 17:2235–2245. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.8.2235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Schmidt A, Bickle M, Beck T, Hall MN. 1997. The yeast phosphatidylinositol kinase homolog TOR2 activates RHO1 and RHO2 via the exchange factor ROM2. Cell 88:531–542. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81893-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Van Hoof C, Janssens V, De Baere I, Stark MJ, de Winde JH, Winderickx J, Thevelein JM, Merlevede W, Goris J. 2001. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae phosphotyrosyl phosphatase activator proteins are required for a subset of the functions disrupted by protein phosphatase 2A mutations. Exp Cell Res 264:372–387. doi: 10.1006/excr.2000.5144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Düvel K, Santhanam A, Garrett S, Schneper L, Broach JR. 2003. Multiple roles of Tap42 in mediating rapamycin-induced transcriptional changes in yeast. Mol Cell 11:1467–1478. doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00228-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Singh NS, Shao N, McLean JR, Sevugan M, Ren L, Chew TG, Bimbo A, Sharma R, Tang X, Gould KL, Balasubramanian MK. 2011. SIN-inhibitory phosphatase complex promotes Cdc11p dephosphorylation and propagates SIN asymmetry in fission yeast. Curr Biol 21:1968–1978. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.10.051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Simanis V. 2015. Pombe’s thirteen—control of fission yeast cell division by the septation initiation network. J Cell Sci 128:1465–1474. doi: 10.1242/jcs.094821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Beckett A. 1981. The ultrastructure of septal pores and associated structures in the ascogenous hyphae and asci of Sordaria humana. Protoplasma 107:127–147. doi: 10.1007/BF01275613. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Lai J, Koh CH, Tjota M, Pieuchot L, Raman V, Chandrababu KB, Yang D, Wong L, Jedd G. 2012. Intrinsically disordered proteins aggregate at fungal cell-to-cell channels and regulate intercellular connectivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:15781–15786. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1207467109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Jerpseth B, Greener A, Short JM, Viola J, Kretz PL. 1992. XL1-blue MRFʹ E. coli cells: mcrA-, mcrCB-, mcrF-, mmr-, hsdR- derivative of XL1-blue cells. Strategies Mol Biol 5:81–83. [Google Scholar]
- 60.Sambrook J, Russel DW. 2001. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 3rd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY. [Google Scholar]
- 61.Wood WB. 1966. Host specificity of DNA produced by Escherichia coli: bacterial mutations affecting the restriction and modification of DNA. J Mol Biol 16:118–133. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(66)80267-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.James P, Halladay J, Craig EA. 1996. Genomic libraries and a host strain designed for highly efficient two-hybrid selection in yeast. Genetics 144:1425–1436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Colot HV, Park G, Turner GE, Ringelberg C, Crew CM, Litvinkova L, Weiss RL, Borkovich KA, Dunlap JC. 2006. A high-throughput gene knockout procedure for Neurospora reveals functions for multiple transcription factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:10352–10357. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0601456103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Anonymous. 2009. Yeast protocols handbook. Clontech Laboratories, Inc., Mount View, CA. [Google Scholar]
- 65.Kamerewerd J, Jansson M, Nowrousian M, Pöggeler S, Kück U. 2008. Three alpha-subunits of heterotrimeric G proteins and an adenylyl cyclase have distinct roles in fruiting body development in the homothallic fungus Sordaria macrospora. Genetics 180:191–206. doi: 10.1534/genetics.108.091603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Dirschnabel DE, Nowrousian M, Cano-Domínguez N, Aguirre J, Teichert I, Kück U. 2014. New insights into the roles of NADPH oxidases in sexual development and ascospore germination in Sordaria macrospora. Genetics 196:729–744. doi: 10.1534/genetics.113.159368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Pöggeler S, Kück U. 2006. Highly efficient generation of signal transduction knockout mutants using a fungal strain deficient in the mammalian ku70 ortholog. Gene 378:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2006.03.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Engh I, Würtz C, Witzel-Schlömp K, Zhang HY, Hoff B, Nowrousian M, Rottensteiner H, Kück U. 2007. The WW domain protein PRO40 is required for fungal fertility and associates with Woronin bodies. Eukaryot Cell 6:831–843. doi: 10.1128/EC.00269-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Nowrousian M, Teichert I, Masloff S, Kück U. 2012. Whole-genome sequencing of Sordaria macrospora mutants identifies developmental genes. G3 (Bethesda) 2:261–270. doi: 10.1534/g3.111.001479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Schmitt EK, Hoff B, Kück U. 2004. AcFKH1, a novel member of the forkhead family, associates with the RFX transcription factor CPCR1 in the cephalosporin C-producing fungus Acremonium chrysogenum. Gene 342:269–281. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2004.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Gietz RD, Schiestl RH. 2007. Frozen competent yeast cells that can be transformed with high efficiency using the LiAc/SS carrier DNA/PEG method. Nat Protoc 2:1–4. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Becker DM, Lundblad V. 1994. Introduction of DNA into yeast cells, p 13.17.11–13.17.10 In Ausubel FM, Brent R, Kingston RE, Moore DD, Seidman JG, Smith JA, Struhl K (ed), Current protocols in molecular biology. Wiley, New York, NY. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Kopke K, Hoff B, Bloemendal S, Katschorowski A, Kamerewerd J, Kück U. 2013. Members of the Penicillium chrysogenum velvet complex play functionally opposing roles in the regulation of penicillin biosynthesis and conidiation. Eukaryot Cell 12:299–310. doi: 10.1128/EC.00272-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Tucker CL, Peteya LA, Pittman AM, Zhong J. 2009. A genetic test for yeast two-hybrid bait competency using RanBPM. Genetics 182:1377–1379. doi: 10.1534/genetics.109.103069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Rech C, Engh I, Kück U. 2007. Detection of hyphal fusion in filamentous fungi using differently fluorescence-labeled histones. Curr Genet 52:259–266. doi: 10.1007/s00294-007-0158-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Fontal OI, Vieytes MR, Baptista de Sousa JM, Louzao MC, Botana LM. 1999. A fluorescent microplate assay for microcystin-LR. Anal Biochem 269:289–296. doi: 10.1006/abio.1999.3099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Gee KR, Sun WC, Bhalgat MK, Upson RH, Klaubert DH, Latham KA, Haugland RP. 1999. Fluorogenic substrates based on fluorinated umbelliferones for continuous assays of phosphatases and beta-galactosidases. Anal Biochem 273:41–48. doi: 10.1006/abio.1999.4202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Heilig Y, Schmitt K, Seiler S. 2013. Phospho-regulation of the Neurospora crassa septation initiation network. PLoS One 8:e79464. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.