Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2016 Jun 23;11(6):e0157631. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157631

Dengue in Malaysia: Factors Associated with Dengue Mortality from a National Registry

Su May Liew 1,*,#, Ee Ming Khoo 1,#, Bee Kiau Ho 2,#, Yew Kong Lee 1,#, Mimi Omar 3,#, Vickneswari Ayadurai 4,#, Fazlina Mohamed Yusoff 5,#, Zailiza Suli 6, Rose Nani Mudin 6, Pik Pin Goh 7, Karuthan Chinna 8
Editor: Ray Borrow9
PMCID: PMC4919027  PMID: 27336440

Abstract

Background

The increasing incidence and geographical distribution of dengue has had significant impact on global healthcare services and resources. This study aimed to determine the factors associated with dengue-related mortality in a cohort of Malaysian patients.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study of patients in the Malaysian National Dengue Registry of 2013. The outcome measure was dengue-related mortality. Associations between sociodemographic and clinical variables with the outcome were analysed using multivariate analysis.

Results

There were 43 347 cases of which 13081 were serologically confirmed. The mean age was 30.0 years (SD 15.7); 60.2% were male. The incidence of dengue increased towards the later part of the calendar year. There were 92 probable dengue mortalities, of which 41 were serologically confirmed. Multivariate analysis in those with positive serology showed that increasing age (OR 1.03; CI:1.01–1.05), persistent vomiting (OR 13.34; CI: 1.92–92.95), bleeding (OR 5.84; CI 2.17–15.70) and severe plasma leakage (OR 66.68; CI: 9.13–487.23) were associated with mortality. Factors associated with probable dengue mortality were increasing age (OR 1.04; CI:1.03–1.06), female gender (OR 1.53; CI:1.01–2.33), nausea and/or vomiting (OR 1.80; CI:1.17–2.77), bleeding (OR 3.01; CI:1.29–7.04), lethargy and/or restlessness (OR 5.97; CI:2.26–15.78), severe plasma leakage (OR 14.72; CI:1.54–140.70), and shock (OR 1805.37; CI:125.44–25982.98), in the overall study population.

Conclusions

Older persons and those with persistent vomiting, bleeding or severe plasma leakage, which were associated with mortality, at notification should be monitored closely and referred early if indicated. Doctors and primary care practitioners need to detect patients with dengue early before they develop these severe signs and symptoms.

Introduction

Dengue is the most common and serious arthropod-borne viral disease. First reported in 1779 by David Bylon during an epidemic in Indonesia, there has been a dramatic expansion in disease distribution in the last 50 years [1]. Before 1970, only nine countries had dengue epidemics. Currently, dengue is endemic in more than a hundred countries in five out of the six WHO regions [2]. It is estimated that there are 2.5 billion people living in dengue-endemic countries [3, 4].

Nearly 75% of the global dengue disease burden is in the WHO South East Asia and Western Pacific regions [3, 4]. Dengue was first reported in 1902 in Penang, Malaysia [5]. The incidence rate of dengue in Malaysia had quadrupled from 44.3 cases/100 000 in 1999 to 181 cases/100 000 in 2007 [6] and the number of reported dengue cases has increased 6.5 fold in the last decade [7]. Since 2001, the fatality rate has been 2 to 3 in a thousand cases except for 2007 where it increased to 6 in a thousand [6, 7]. The high dengue incidence, and its possible complications and fatalities, has posed a huge burden on the national health care system. During dengue epidemics, vital resources including time, hospital beds, finances and personnel are diverted from other serious disease areas.

Dengue has a wide spectrum of clinical presentations and its clinical course can be unpredictable [8]. The WHO 1997 guidelines classified dengue into undifferentiated fever, dengue fever and dengue haemorrhagic fever (DHF). DHF was further classified into four severity grades with grade 3 and 4 defined as dengue shock syndrome (DSS) [9]. However, difficulties in applying the criteria in clinical practice have led to a revision of the classification with the disease classified as severe and non-severe dengue with or without warning signs [8].

A study in Singapore of 596 dengue cases found that female gender, lower than normal haematocrit levels, abdominal distension, vomiting and fever on admission were factors associated with severe dengue [10]. Another study on 560 dengue patients in France found that plasma leakage, severe thrombocytopenia and acute hepatitis were associated with increased mortality [11]. Abdominal pain, cough and diarrhoea were found to predict development of severe complications [11]. In Vietnam, young age and female gender were found to be associated with dengue mortality [12]. Similar findings were shown in a meta-analysis by Huy et al. [13].

The identification of variables associated with poor outcomes assists health care practitioners to focus on patients at higher risk and facilitate patient flow. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the factors associated with dengue-related mortality in a cohort of patients in the Malaysian dengue registry in 2013.

Materials and Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients in the 2013 Malaysian national dengue (e-Dengue) registry. In Malaysia, all cases of dengue diagnosed by clinical suspicion or serological confirmation must be reported to the district health authorities using an online notification system (e-Notice). Data on socio-demographic characteristics, clinical features at notification, full blood count and disease diagnosis were sent through e-Notice. The district health authorities verified the diagnosis using the WHO 1997 criteria of acute febrile illness with two or more dengue manifestations [9]. A probable dengue case was defined as an acute febrile illness with two or more clinical manifestations (headache, retro-orbital pain, myalgia, arthralgia, rash, hemorrhagic manifestations, leukopenia) in addition to supportive serology or occurrence at the same location and time as other confirmed cases of dengue fever. A confirmed dengue case is one confirmed by laboratory criteria such as dengue virus isolation, a fourfold rise in antibody titres, virus antigen detection or virus genomic sequence detection [9]. The data was then entered into the e-Dengue registry at the district health office.

In this study, data was analysed using SPSS statistical software package (version 22.0; SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). The outcome measure used was dengue-related mortality. Socio-demographic and clinical data were described using proportions. Continuous variables were checked for normality. Associations between variables and outcomes were first analysed using univariate analysis. Variables with a p-value of less than 0.25 were selected for inclusion into the multivariate analysis model [14]. However, variables were only considered as significant if the multivariate analysis showed that the association had a p-value of less than 0.05. Multivariate analysis was performed using the Enter method.

Names and identifiers of the patients in the registry were anonymised and kept confidential. The study was approved by the Malaysian Research Ethics Committee, NMRR-14-1275-22205.

Results

In 2013, there were 43 347 cases of dengue entered into the registry. There were 96 deaths, of which 92 were attributed to dengue. Of the dengue deaths, 8 were children, who were less than 15 years of age. The overall dengue case fatality rate was 0.2%.

Table 1 shows a summary of socio-demographic characteristics of the cohort. The mean age was 30.0 years (SD 15.7) with more men than women. Most cases were from urban areas. The incidence of dengue increased towards the later part of the year (Fig 1).

Table 1. Socio-demographic characteristics of patients with dengue in Malaysia in 2013 (n = 43347).

Socio demographic characteristics Total n (%) Alive, n (%) Dead, n (%), n = 92
Age (n = 43347)
Mean (SD) (years) 30.0 (15.7) 30.0 (15.7) 41.8 (20.5)
Median (years) 28.0 28.0 42.5
Range (years) <1–96 <1–96 <1–84
Gender (n = 43347)
Male 26086 (60.2) 26042 (60.2) 42 (45.7)
Female 17261 (39.8) 17209 (39.8) 50 (54.3)
Nationality (n = 43347)
Malaysian 29665 (91.5) 39574 (91.5) 87 (94.6)
Non Malaysian 3682 (8.5) 3677 (8.5) 5 (5.4)
Ethnicity (n = 39662)
Malay 23486 (54.2) 23433 (59.2) 50 (57.5)
Chinese 10045 (23.2) 10021 (25.3) 24 (27.6)
Indian 4223 (9.7) 4216 (10.7) 6 (6.9)
Indigenous West Malaysia 172 (0.4) 172 (0.4) 0 (0.0)
Indigenous Sarawak 920 (2.1) 917 (2.3) 3 (3.4)
Indigenous Sabah 567 (1.3) 563 (1.4) 4 (4.6)
Others 249 (0.6) 249 (0.6) 0 (0.0)
Place of dwelling (n = 38084)
Urban 32061 (84.2) 31990 (84.2) 68 (80.0)
Rural 6023 (15.8) 6005 (15.8) 17 (20.0)

Fig 1. Number of dengue cases in Malaysia between December 2012-December 2013.

Fig 1

* All months are in 2013 unless otherwise stated.

Table 2 summarizes clinical manifestations at notification. The five most common accompanying features were body or joint ache, headache, nausea and/or vomiting, abdominal symptoms and rash.

Table 2. Clinical manifestations at notification (n = 43347).

Clinical manifestation Total n (%) Alive n (%), n = 43255 Dead, n (%), n = 92
Body or joint ache 37209 (85.8) 37134 (85.8) 73 (79.3)
Headache 32913 (75.9) 32849 (75.9) 63 (68.5)
Nausea and/or vomiting 14917 (34.4) 14867 (34.4) 47 (51.1)
Abdominal symptoms 12489 (28.8) 12455 (28.8) 31 (33.7)
Rash 6700 (15.5) 6689 (15.5) 11 (12.0)
Suborbital pain 1655 (3.8) 1653 (3.8) 2 (2.2)
Bleeding 864 (2.0) 856 (2.0) 7 (7.6)
Abdominal pain or tenderness 805 (1.9) 801 (1.9) 3 (3.3)
Lethargy and/or restlessness 316 (0.7) 310 (0.7) 6 (6.5)
Persistent vomiting 64 (0.1) 62 (0.1) 2 (2.2)
Severe plasma leakage 27 (0.1) 25 (0.1) 2 (2.2)
Liver enlargement 2cm 5 (<0.1) 5 (<0.1)) 0 (0.0)
Shock 4 (<0.1) 1 (<0.1) 3 (3.3)
Clinical fluid accumulation 2 (<0.1) 2 (<0.1) 0 (0.0)
Organ failure (kidney/liver/central nervous system/heart) 2 (<0.1) 1 (<0.1) 1 (1.1)
Severe bleeding 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)

Serological testing was done in 69.3% (30020) of the cohort of which 13081 were positive, 1210 were negative, 39 were equivocal and 15690 had no documented results. Table 3 shows the univariate and multivariate analysis of possible factors of dengue-related mortality (n = 41) in the serologically positive population. Multivariate analysis in those with confirmed dengue shows that increasing age, persistent vomiting, bleeding and severe plasma leakage were associated with mortality.

Table 3. Univariate and multivariate analysis (n = 13081) of dengue mortality in serologically-confirmed cases.

Variables Alive n (%) Dengue-related death, n (%) Univariate analysis, OR (95% CI) p Multivariate analysis, OR (95% CI) p
Mean Age, years (SD) 30.7 (15.86) 37.6 (21.19) 1.03 (1.01–1.04) 0.006 1.03 (1.01–1.05) 0.002
Gender
Male 7580 (99.7) 19 (0.3) 1 1
Female 5458 (99.6) 22 (0.4) 1.61 (0.87–2.97) 0.130 1.49 (0.80–2.78) 0.214
Nationality
Malaysian 12188 (99.7) 38 (0.3) 1
Non Malaysian 850 (99.6) 3 (0.4) 1.13 (0.35–3.68) 0.836
Race (n = 39658) 0.580
Malay 6011 (99.7) 18 (0.3) 1
Chinese 4015 (99.7) 13 (0.3) 48.38 x 105 0.997
Indian 1241 (99.8) 2 (0.2) 52.30 x 105 0.997
Indigenous people 848 (99.4) 5 (0.6) 26.03 x 105 0.998
Others 71 (100.0) 0 (0.0) 95.25 x 105 0.997
Place of dwelling (n = 38080)
Urban 9642 (99.7) 32 (0.3) 1
Rural 1920 (99.6) 7 (0.4) 0.91 (0.40–2.07) 0.822
Month of onset 0.918
December 2012 166 (99.4) 1 (0.6) 1
January 692 (99.4) 4 (0.6) 0.96 (0.11–8.64) 0.971
February 593 (99.5) 3 (0.5) 0.84 (0.09–8.13) 0.880
March 647 (99.7) 2 (0.3) 0.51 (0.05–5.69) 0.587
April 595 (99.7) 2 (0.3) 0.56 (0.05–6.19) 0.635
May 640 (99.7) 2 (0.3) 0.52 (0.05–5.76) 0.593
June 945 (99.8) 2 (0.2) 0.35 (0.03–3.90) 0.394
July 985 (99.9) 1 (0.1) 0.17 (0.01–2.71) 0.209
August 1008 (99.5) 5 (0.5) 0.82 (0.10–7.09) 0.860
September 1188 (99.7) 4 (0.3) 0.56 (0.06–5.03) 0.604
October 1700 (99.7) 5 (0.3) 0.49 (0.06–4.20) 0.514
November 2080 (99.8) 4 (0.2) 0.32 (0.04–2.87) 0.308
December 1799 (99.7) 6 (0.3) 0.55 (0.07–4.63) 0.585
Headache
YES 9937 (99.7) 28 (0.3) 1 1
NO 3101 (99.6) 13 (0.4) 1.48 (0.77–2.88) 0.237 1.46 (0.73–2.93) 0.283
Suborbital Pain
YES 637 (99.8) 1 (0.2) 1
NO 12401 (99.7) 40 (0.3) 2.05 (0.28–14.97) 0.477
Body or Joint Ache
YES 11390 (99.7) 31 (0.3) 1 1
NO 1648 (99.4) 10 (0.6) 2.23 (1.09–4.56) 0.028 1.95 (0.90–4.25) 0.091
Nausea and/or vomiting
YES 4171 (99.6) 18 (0.4) 1.66 (0.90–3.09) 0.106 1.38 (0.72–2.67) 0.327
NO 8867 (99.7) 23 (0.3) 1 1
Rash
YES 1967 (99.6) 7 (0.4) 1.16 (0.51–2.62) 0.723
NO 11071 (99.7) 34 (0.3) 1
Abdominal symptoms
YES 3848 (99.7) 11 (0.3) 0.87 (0.44–1.75) 0.707
NO 9190 (99.7) 30 (0.3) 1
Bleeding
YES 254 (98.1) 5 (1.9) 6.99 (2.72–17.96) <0.001 5.84 (2.17–15.70) <0.001
NO 12784 (99.7) 36 (0.3) 1 1
Abdominal pain or tenderness
YES 245 (99.2) 2 (0.8) 2.68 (0.64–11.15) 0.176 1.06 (0.19–5.92) 0.946
NO 12793 (99.7) 39 (0.3) 1 1
Persistent vomiting
YES 23 (92.0) 2 (8.0) 29.02 (6.61–127.31) <0.001 13.34 (1.92–92.95) 0.009
NO 13015 (99.7) 39 (0.3) 1 1
Clinical fluid accumulation
YES 2 (100.0) 0 (0.0)
NO 13036 (99.7) 42 (0.3) 1.00
Lethargy and/or restlessness
YES 108 (98.2) 2 (1.8) 6.14 (1.46–25.75) 0.013 0.94 (0.10–8.65) 0.955
NO 12930 (99.7) 39 (0.3) 1 1
Liver enlargement 2cm
YES 3 (100.0) 0 (0.0)
NO 13035 (99.7) 41 (0.3) 0.999
Severe plasma leakage
YES 8 (80.0) 2 (20.0) 83.53 (17.19–405.94) <0.001 66.68 (9.13–487.23) <0.001
NO 13030 (99.7) 39 (0.3) 1 1
Shock
YES 0 (0.0) 3 (100.0) 0.999
NO 13038 (99.7) 38 (0.3)
Severe bleeding
YES 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
NO 13038 (99.7) 41 (0.3)
Organ failure
YES 0 (0.0) 1 (100.0) 0.999
NO 13038 (99.7) 40 (0.3)

Table 4 shows the univariate and multivariate analysis of possible factors of probably dengue-related mortality in the overall study population. Multivariate analysis shows that increasing age, female gender, nausea and/or vomiting, bleeding, lethargy and/or restlessness, severe plasma leakage and shock were associated with mortality.

Table 4. Univariate and multivariate analysis (n = 43343) of probable dengue-related mortality.

Variables Alive n (%) Dengue-related death, n (%) Univariate analysis, OR (95% CI) p Multivariate analysis, OR (95% CI) p
Mean Age, years (SD) 30.0 (15.7) 41.8 (20.5) 1.04 (1.03–1.05) <0.001 1.04 (1.03–1.06) <0.001
Gender
Male 26042 (99.8) 42 (0.2) 1 1
Female 17209 (99.7) 50 (0.3) 1.80 (1.20–2.72) 0.005 1.53 (1.01–2.33) 0.047
Nationality
Malaysian 39574 (99.8) 87 (0.2) 1.62 (0.66–3.98)
Non Malaysian 3677 (99.9) 5 (0.1) 1 0.297
Race (n = 39658) 0.369
Malay 23433 (99.8) 50 (0.2) 1
Chinese 10021 (99.8) 24 (0.2) 1.12 (0.69–1.83) 0.642
Indian 4216 (99.9) 6 (0.1) 0.67 (0.29–1.56) 0.349
Indigenous people 1652 (99.6) 7 (0.4) 1.99 (0.90–4.39) 0.090
Others 249 (100.0) 0 (0.0) 0.00 (0.00) 0.995
Place of dwelling (n = 38080)
Urban 31990 (99.8) 68 (0.2) 1
Rural 6005 (99.7) 17 (0.3) 1.33 (0.78–2.27) 0.291
Month of onset 0.752
December 2012 486 (99.8) 1 (0.2) 1
January 2283 (99.8) 5 (0.2) 1.30 (0.38–4.51) 0.675
February 1751 (99.7) 5 (0.3) 0.68 (0.16–2.87) 0.605
March 2000 (99.9) 3 (0.1) 0.71 (0.17–2.96) 0.635
April 1938 (99.8) 3 (0.2) 0.82 (0.22–3.05) 0.766
May 2230 (99.8) 4 (0.2) 1.16 (0.37–3.67) 0.796
June 2747 (99.7) 7 (0.3) 0.65 (0.18–2.44) 0.528
July 2789 (99.9) 4 (0.1) 1.10 (0.36–3.38) 0.862
August 3309 (99.8) 8 (0.2) 1.71 (0.63–4.65) 0.291
September 4532 (99.6) 17 (0.4) 0.85 (0.30–2.41) 0.759
October 7095 (99.8) 12 (0.2) 0.77 (0.27–2.19) 0.628
November 7095 (99.8) 12 (0.2) 0.89 (0.31–2.57) 0.830
December 5639 (99.8) 11 (0.2) 0.94 (0.11–8.06) 0.955
Headache
YES 32489 (99.8) 63 (0.2) 0.69 (0.44–1.07) 0.688
NO 10402 (99.7) 29 (0.3) 1
Suborbital Pain
YES 1653 (99.9) 2 (0.1) 1
NO 41598 (99.8) 90 (0.2) 1.79 (0.44–7.27) 0.417
Body or Joint Ache
YES 37134 (99.8) 73 (0.2) 1 1
NO 6117 (99.7) 19 (0.3) 1.58 (0.95–2.62) 0.076 1.52 (0.90–2.58) 0.120
Nausea and/or vomiting
YES 14867 (99.7) 47 (0.3) 1.99 (1.32–3.00) 0.001 1.80 (1.17–2.77) 0.008
NO 28384 (99.8) 45 (0.2) 1 1
Rash
YES 6689 (99.8) 11 (0.2) 1
NO 36562 (99.8) 81 (0.2) 1.35 (0.72–2.53) 0.354
Abdominal symptoms
YES 12455 (99.8) 31 (0.2) 1.26 (0.82–1.93) 0.301
NO 30796 (99.8) 61 (0.2) 1
Bleeding
YES 856 (99.2) 7 (0.8) 4.08 (1.88–8.84) <0.001 3.01 (1.29–7.04) 0.011
NO 42395 (99.8) 85 (0.2) 1 1
Abdominal pain or tenderness
YES 801 (99.6) 3 (0.4) 1.79 (0.56–5.66) 0.324
NO 42450 (99.8) 89 (0.2) 1
Persistent vomiting
YES 62 (96.9) 2 (3.1) 15.48 (3.73–64.25) <0.001 0.41 (0.01–18.35) 0.648
NO 43189 (99.8) 90 (0.2) 1 1
Clinical fluid accumulation
YES 2 (100.0) 0 (0.0)
NO 43249 (99.8) 92 (0.2) 1.00
Lethargy and/or restlessness
YES 310 (98.1) 6 (1.9) 9.66 (4.19–22.28) <0.001 5.97 (2.26–15.78) <0.001
NO 42491 (99.8) 86 (0.2) 1 1
Liver enlargement 2cm
YES 5 (100.0) 0 (0.0)
NO 43246 (99.8) 92 (0.2) 0.999
Severe plasma leakage
YES 25 (92.6) 2 (7.4) 38.42 (8.97–164.63) <0.001 14.72 (1.54–140.67) 0.020
NO 43226 (99.8) 90 (0.2) 1 1
Shock
YES 1 (25.0) 3 (75.0) 1457.87 (150.21–14149.51) <0.001 1805.37 (125.44–25982.98) <0.001
NO 43250 (99.8) 89 (0.2) 1 1
Severe bleeding
YES 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
NO 43251 (99.8) 92 (0.2)
Organ failure
YES 1 (50.0) 1 (50.0) 475.28 (29.50–7656.58) <0.001 2.947 (0.00–9.74x1010) 0.923
NO 43250 (99.8) 91 (0.2) 1 1

Table 5 shows the univariate and multivariate analysis of possible factors of dengue-related mortality in the adult study population (age 15 years and above). Multivariate analysis shows that increasing age, nausea and/or vomiting, lethargy or restlessness, and severe plasma leakage were associated with mortality.

Table 5. Univariate and multivariate analysis (n = 37021) of probable dengue-related mortality in Adults (≥15 years old).

Variables Alive n (%) Dengue-related death, n (%) Univariate analysis, OR (95% CI) p Multivariate analysis, OR (95% CI) p
Mean Age, years (SD) 33.6 (13.95) 45.2 (18.05) 1.05 (1.04–1.06) <0.001 1.05 (1.04–1.06) <0.001
Gender (n = 37018)
Male 22478 (99.8) 40 (0.2) 1 1
Female 14456 (99.7) 44 (0.3) 1.71 (1.11–2.63) 0.014 1.34 (0.87–2.08) 0.190
Nationality
Malaysian 33352 (99.8) 79 (0.2) 1.70 (0.69–4.19) 0.252
Non Malaysian 3582 (99.9) 5 (0.1) 1
Race (n = 33427) 0.622
Malay 19372 (99.8) 45 (0.2) 1
Chinese 8778 (99.8) 22 (0.3) 1.08 (0.65–1.80) 0.771
Indian 3539 (99.8) 6 (0.2) 073 (0.31–1.71) 0.469
Indigenous people 1439 (99.6) 6 (0.4) 1.80 (0.77–4.21) 0.179
Others 220 (100.0) 0 (0.0) 0 0.996
Place of dwelling (n = 32570)
Urban 27304 (99.8) 63 (0.2) 1
Rural 5189 (99.7) 14 (0.3) 1.17 (0.66–2.09) 0.597
Month of onset 0.660
December 2012 407 (99.8) 1 (0.2) 1
January 1938 (99.8) 4 (0.2) 0.84 (0.09–7.54) 0.876
February 1477 (99.7) 5 (0.3) 1.38 (0.16–11.83) 0.770
March 1693 (99.9) 2 (0.1) 0.48 (0.04–5.32) 0.550
April 1644 (99.8) 3 (0.2) 0.74 (0.08–7.16) 0.797
May 1933 (99.9) 2 (0.1) 0.42 (0.04–4.66) 0.481
June 2396 (99.8) 6 (0.2) 1.02 (0.12–8.49) 0.986
July 2394 (99.8) 4 (0.2) 0.68 (0.08–6.10) 0.730
August 2867 (99.8) 7 (0.2) 0.99 (0.12–8.10) 0.995
September 3835 (99.6) 16 (0.4) 1.79 (0.23–12.84) 0.608
October 5431 (99.8) 12 (0.2) 0.90 (0.12–6.93) 0.919
November 6114 (99.8) 12 (0.2) 0.80 (0.10–6.16) 0.829
December 4805 (99.8) 10 (0.2) 0.85 (0.11–6.63) 0.874
Headache
YES 28606 (99.8) 60 (0.2) 1
NO 8328 (99.7) 24 (0.3) 1.37 (0.86–2.21) 0.189
Suborbital pain
YES 1477 (99.9) 2 (0.1) 1
NO 35457 (99.8) 82 (0.2) 1.71 (0.42–6.95) 0.455
Body or joint ache
YES 32353 (99.8) 70 (0.2) 1 1
NO 4581 (99.7) 14 (0.3) 1.41 (0.80–2.51) 0.239 1.26 (0.70–2.27) 0.451
Nausea and/or vomiting
YES 12422 (99.7) 42 (0.3) 1.97 (1.229–3.03) 0.002 1.90 (1.22–2.98) 0.005
NO 24512 (99.8) 42 (0.2) 1 1
Rash
YES 5449 (99.8) 9 (0.2) 1
NO 31485 (99.8) 75 (0.2) 1.44 (0.77–2.88) 0.300
Abdominal symptoms
YES 10493 (99.7) 27 (0.3) 1.19 (0.76–1.89) 0.449
NO 26441 (99.8) 57 (0.2) 1
Bleeding
YES 750 (99.5) 4 (0.5) 2.41 (0.88–6.60) 0.086 1.95 (0.68–5.59) 0.213
NO 26184 (99.8) 80 (0.2) 1 1
Abdominal pain or tenderness
YES 670 (99.6) 3 (0.4) 2.01 (0.63–6.36) 0.238 1.05 (0.28–3.98) 0.943
NO 36264 (99.8) 81 (0.2) 1 1
Persistent vomiting
YES 50 (96.2) 2 (3.8) 17.99 (4.31–75.17) <0.001 2.99 (0.34–26.38) 0.325
NO 36884 (99.8) 82 (0.2) 1 1
Clinical fluid accumulation
YES 2 (100.0) 0 (0.0)
NO 36932 (99.8) 84 (0.2) 1.00
Lethargy and/or restlessness
YES 251 (97.7) 6 (2.3) 11.24 (4.86–26.03) <0.001 5.98 (2.13–16.81) 0.001
NO 36683 (99.8) 78 (0.2) 1 1
Liver enlargement 2cm
YES 2 (100.0) 0 (0.0)
NO 36932 (99.8) 84 (0.2) 1.00
Severe plasma leakage
YES 17 (89.5) 2 (10.5) 52.97 (12.04–232.93) <0.001 23.32 (2.58–229.10) 0.005
NO 36917 (99.8) 82 (0.2) 1 1
Shock
YES 1 (50.0) 1 (50.0) 444.98 (27.60–7173.74) <0.001 2.19 (0.00–22954.64) 0.868
NO 36933 (99.8) 83 (0.2) 1 1
Severe bleeding
YES 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
NO 36934 (99.8) 84 (0.2)
Organ failure
YES 1 (50.0) 1 (50.0) 444.98 (27.60–7173.74) <0.001 27.72 (0.00–235825.80) 0.472
NO 36933 (99.8) 83 (0.2) 1 1

Discussion

The large cohort is a reflection of the increase in the incidence of dengue in the past decade [15]. The case fatality rate of 2 in a thousand is consistent with that found over the years since 2001 [6, 7]. With proper identification of factors associated with dengue mortality, time and resources can be focused on those at highest risk.

Our findings show that among those who were serologically confirmed, increasing age, persistent vomiting, bleeding and severe plasma leakage were independently associated with mortality. This differed from the overall study population because it included persistent vomiting, and excluded female gender, nausea and/or vomiting, lethargy and/or restlessness and shock. These added factors are non-specific and one possible explanation is that the death could have been due to other non-dengue illnesses. However, there were only 41 deaths in the serologically confirmed group which represented 44.6% of overall deaths. Only 30.2% of the entire study population (13081 of 43343) were serologically positive. The relatively small number of deaths which is the outcome of interest limits the prognostic information available even with the large study population. We included data from the entire study population as the diagnosis was made based on the WHO clinical criteria for dengue. For those with serological results, 91.3% were positive showing that clinical diagnosis is highly predictive of dengue. Determination of early warning symptoms and signs in the overall population regardless of serological confirmation is crucial in actual clinical practice as this is the population that presents to primary care. The burden of caring for those who are clinically suspected to have dengue is overwhelming as many of the early symptoms and signs are non-specific. Yet, dengue is endemic and is potentially fatal. Early warning symptoms and signs can help the primary care practitioner to identify those who are at greater risk of complications even when diagnostic test results are not available.

We found that increasing age was associated with mortality in the serologically confirmed as well as the overall study cohort. The mean age of those who died from dengue was 12 years greater than those who survived. The number of children who died from dengue in this study population was very small and we were unable to perform a multivariate analysis on this sub-group. In the multivariate analysis of the adult subgroup, increasing age remained a significant associated factor. Older age was found to be associated with severe dengue in France [11]. This differed from a study in Vietnam which found that mortality was highest in young children [12]. A meta-analysis by Huy et al found that age was negatively associated with dengue shock syndrome. However, there was high heterogeneity and this association was mainly seen in studies on children. They were unable to analyse the age factor in adults [13]. The number of children who died from dengue in this study population was very small and we were unable to perform any analysis in this sub-group.

Although gender was associated with mortality in the overall study population, this was not seen in the subgroup analysis for adult nor the serologically confirmed group. Studies have conflicting evidence on the association of gender with severe dengue or dengue-related death. A meta-analysis, and studies in Singapore and Vietnam found that female gender was associated with severe dengue [12, 13, 16]. However, a study in France showed that male gender was associated with severe dengue manifestations [11]. It is unclear as to the mechanism by which age and gender affects the disease manifestation and outcomes. Studies have reported that gender differences could be due to differences in physiology [17] or health seeking behavior [13, 16].

This study found that persistent vomiting, bleeding and severe plasma leakage was associated with dengue-related mortality in the serologically confirmed group while nausea and/or vomiting, bleeding, lethargy, severe plasma leakage and shock were associated with dengue-related mortality in the overall population. Of these, only nausea and/or vomiting has not been included as a warning sign in guideline recommendations [6]. Nausea and/or vomiting should be considered as an early warning sign that can alert the attending health care practitioner to monitor such patients closely. Nausea and vomiting were also found to be associated with dengue shock syndrome in a meta-analysis and other studies [13, 18]. These symptoms could lead to reduced fluid intake and hence dehydration and serious complications during the phase of plasma leakage. Primary care practitioners should be alerted to these warning signs, as they are the first line contacts for these patients at risk. Bleeding, shock and severe plasma leakage are late manifestations. It is important to detect bleeding and plasma leakage early by monitoring hematocrit levels frequently. Frequent testing during the critical period will guide clinicians in adjusting the rate of intravenous fluid replacement to prevent severe plasma leakage and therefore avert shock. Thrombocytopenia is also useful in detecting early plasma leakage and bleeding. Thus, a complete blood count with haematocrit, white cell and platelet counts is a simple laboratory test that is worth doing to detect and avert these complications [19].

As our data were obtained at notification, some patients presented late in the disease process. Hence the public needs to be educated about dengue and its presentation so that they seek treatment earlier.

We found that the incidence of dengue was greater in the later part of the year. There is evidence that dengue incidence is associated with climatic factors, such as temperature and rainfall [15, 20]. A study in Malaysia showed that rainfall peaked in April and through October to December [21].

Strengths and limitation

The large database of more than 40 000 individuals with significant numbers of mortality enabled the identification of its independent associated factors.

In the process of data cleaning, we found that important factors such as blood indices (platelet count, haematocrit and white cell count) could not be used due to data input error. For example, platelet count were entered as 1.39, 139 or 139 000. In order to ensure that the data were clean, we omitted those variables that could not be verified. Hospitalisation was not captured as a variable in the database and therefore could not be used as a study outcome.

Recommendation

We recommend that further training be given to those who enter the data. A glossary of variables for the database should be developed. In addition, data that is entered needs to be verified by a medical personnel before final entry.

For clinical practice, doctors treating dengue especially those working in the front-line should be made aware of the independent associated factors of dengue mortality. Future studies should include death cases from other years as different serotypes may predominate in different years.

Conclusion

The case fatality rate remains at 2 in a thousand in this cohort. Older persons and patients with persistent vomiting, bleeding or severe plasma leakage, which were associated with mortality, at notification should be monitored closely and referred early for hospitalisation.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Director General of the Ministry of Health Malaysia for permission to publish this work.

Data Availability

We confirm that all data underlying the findings in our study are available in the manuscript.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the National Clinical Research Center, Ministry of Health Malaysia. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Hanley KA, Weaver SC. Frontiers in Dengue Virus Research. Norfolk: Caister Academic Press; 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.World Health Organization. Technical Paper "Dengue: Call for urgent interventions for a rapidly expanding emerging disease" 2011 [3 April 2015]. Available: http://applications.emro.who.int/docs/RC_technical_papers_2011_3_14217.pdf.
  • 3.World Health Organization. Global Alert and Response: Impact of Dengue [3 April 2015]. Available: http://www.who.int/csr/disease/dengue/impact/en/.
  • 4.World Health Organization SEARO. Comprehensive Guidelines for Prevention and Control of Dengue and Dengue Haemorrhagic Fever (Revised and expanded edition). India: World Health Organization Regional Office for South East Asia; 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Skae FMT. Dengue fever in Penang. BMJ. 1902;2:1581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ministry of Health Malaysia. Management of Dengue Infection in Adults (Revised 2nd Edition). Putrajaya: Ministry of Health Malaysia; 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mia MS, Begum RA, Er AC, Abidin RD, Pereira JJ. Trends of dengue infections in Malaysia, 2000–2010. Asian Pac J Trop Med. 2013;6(6):462–6. Epub 2013/05/29. 10.1016/s1995-7645(13)60075-9 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.World Health Organization. Dengue: Guideline for Diagnosis, Treatment, Prevention and Contro. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.World Health Organization. Dengue Haemorrhagic Fever: Diagnosis, Treatment, Prevention and Control, 2nd edn. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Carrasco LR, Leo YS, Cook AR, Lee VJ, Thein TL, Go CJ, et al. Predictive tools for severe dengue conforming to World Health Organization 2009 criteria. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 2014;8(7):e2972 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002972 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Thomas L, Brouste Y, Najioullah F, Hochedez P, Hatchuel Y, Moravie V, et al. Predictors of severe manifestations in a cohort of adult dengue patients. Journal of clinical virology: the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology. 2010;48(2):96–9. 10.1016/j.jcv.2010.03.008 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Anders KL, Nguyet NM, Chau NV, Hung NT, Thuy TT, Lien le B, et al. Epidemiological factors associated with dengue shock syndrome and mortality in hospitalized dengue patients in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene. 2011;84(1):127–34. 10.4269/ajtmh.2011.10-0476 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Huy NT, Van Giang T, Thuy DH, Kikuchi M, Hien TT, Zamora J, et al. Factors associated with dengue shock syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7(9):e2412 Epub 2013/10/03. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002412 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hosmer D, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. New York: Wiley; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mohd-Zaki AH, Brett J, Ismail E, L'Azou M. Epidemiology of dengue disease in Malaysia (2000–2012): a systematic literature review. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 2014;8(11):e3159 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003159 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Yew YW, Ye T, Ang LW, Ng LC, Yap G, James L, et al. Seroepidemiology of dengue virus infection among adults in Singapore. Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore. 2009;38(8):667–75. Epub 2009/09/09. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Halstead SB. Epidemiology of dengue and dengue hemorrhagic fever Dengue and dengue hemorrhagic fever. Wallingford, Oxon, UK; New York: CAB International; 1997. p. xi, 478 p. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Cheah WK, Ng KS, Marzilawati AR, Lum LC. A review of dengue research in malaysia. Med J Malaysia. 2014;69 Suppl A:59–67. Epub 2014/11/25. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.World Health Organization. Handbook for clinical management of dengue Geneva: World Health Organization; 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Johansson MA, Dominici F, Glass GE. Local and global effects of climate on dengue transmission in Puerto Rico. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 2009;3(2):e382 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000382 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wan Fairos W, Wan Azaki W, Mohamad Alias L, Bee Wah Y. Modelling Dengue fever and dengue haemorrhagic fever outbreak using Poisson and negative binomial model. International journal of Mathematical, computational, Physical and Quantum Engineering 2010;4(2):1–6. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

We confirm that all data underlying the findings in our study are available in the manuscript.


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES