SUMMARY
Secondary osteoporosis is less common than primary osteoporosis. It may be suspected in patients who present with a fragility fracture despite having no risk factors for osteoporosis. In addition, secondary osteoporosis should be considered if the bone density Z-score is –2.5 or less.
Consider the fracture site and presence of other clinical clues to guide investigations for an underlying cause. The tests to use are those that are indicated for the suspected cause.
Baseline investigations include tests for bone and mineral metabolism (calcium, phosphate, alkaline phosphatase, 25-hydroxyvitamin D, parathyroid hormone), liver and kidney function, full blood count and thyroid-stimulating hormone. More detailed testing may be required in patients with severe osteoporosis.
Keywords: biopsy of bone, bone density, fracture of bone, osteoporosis, Z-score
Introduction
Secondary osteoporosis results from specific clinical disorders that are potentially reversible. Up to 30% of postmenopausal women and 50% of men with osteoporosis may have an underlying cause. The underlying pathogenesis of secondary osteoporosis is often multifactorial. Correctly treating the cause may ameliorate fracture risk and avoid unnecessary treatment with antiresorptive drugs.1,2
Clinical assessment
Secondary causes of osteoporosis should be considered in patients who suffer a fragility fracture when ‘traditional’ risk factors are insufficient to explain the injury. People with a bone mineral density Z-score –2.5 or less may also have secondary osteoporosis. (The Z-score is a comparison to age-matched, sex-matched individuals.)
Clues to an underlying secondary cause include an atypical fracture, the severity of osteoporosis and the presence of clinical features found through history and clinical examination (e.g. anaemia, malabsorption, amenorrhoea, constitutional symptoms or specific endocrinopathies) (see Table). A careful drug history may identify possible causes. While corticosteroids are well known to cause osteoporosis and fragility fractures, a number of other drugs also increase fracture risk (see Box). However, not all patients with secondary osteoporosis will present with the classic signs of the underlying condition. They may have subclinical disease at the time of their fracture or when the low bone mineral density is detected, with osteoporosis being the first manifestation of their underlying condition.
Table. Secondary causes of osteoporosis.
Disorder | Most common fracture site | Primary mechanism |
---|---|---|
Inflammatory conditions | ||
Rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus | Hip | High bone turnover due to pro-inflammatory cytokines |
Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis | Vertebrae | High bone turnover due to pro-inflammatory cytokines, malnutrition and malabsorption |
Hypogonadism | ||
Premature menopause (auto-immune, surgical, drugs) | Distal radius (Colles), vertebrae | High bone turnover from low oestrogen or low testosterone |
Hypopituitarism (structural or functional) | Distal radius (Colles), vertebrae | High bone turnover from low oestrogen or low testosterone |
Endocrinopathies | ||
Hypercortisolaemia (Cushing’s syndrome) | Vertebrae, ribs | Low bone turnover from impaired bone formation and mineralisation |
Hyperthyroidism | Hip | High bone turnover from increased bone resorption |
Primary hyperparathyroidism | Distal radius, vertebrae | High bone turnover from increased bone resorption |
Hyperprolactinaemia | Distal radius, vertebrae | High bone turnover from oestrogen deficiency |
Acromegaly | Vertebrae | High bone turnover, increase in bone size and co-existing secondary hypogonadism |
Diabetes mellitus | Hip | Low bone turnover from insulinopenia in type 1, mechanism not well understood in type 2 |
Malabsorption | ||
Pernicious anaemia | Vertebrae | Low bone turnover from impaired osteoblast recruitment |
Coeliac disease | Distal radius, vertebrae | High bone turnover due to malnutrition and malabsorption |
Gastrectomy | Vertebrae | High bone turnover due to malnutrition and malabsorption |
Haematological conditions | ||
Multiple myeloma and monoclonal gammopathy of unknown significance | Vertebrae | Uncoupling in bone turnover (high bone resorption and low bone formation) from pro-inflammatory cytokines |
Myeloproliferative disorders | Vertebrae | Direct marrow effects on bone |
Systemic mastocytosis | Vertebrae | High bone turnover from mast cell mediators |
Abnormal bone architecture | ||
Paget’s disease | Long bones | High bone turnover from overactive bone resorption |
Osteopetrosis | Hip, long bones | Low bone turnover due to defective bone resorption |
Malignancy (primary or secondary) | Affected bones | High bone turnover from paraneoplastic effects |
Other conditions | ||
Chronic liver disease | Vertebrae | Low bone turnover from liver disease and increased bone resorption due to malabsorption, vitamin D deficiency and hypogonadism |
Chronic kidney disease | Hip, vertebrae | High bone turnover from osteomalacia, secondary hyperparathyroidism or mixed bone disease, or low bone turnover from adynamic bone disease (from aluminium or iron) |
Kidney transplantation | Vertebrae, small bones | High bone turnover and tertiary hyperparathyroidism |
Box. Drugs that increase fracture risk.
Corticosteroids (≥5 mg prednisolone daily or equivalent for ≥3 months)
Antiepileptics: carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbitone
Hypoglycaemics: thiazolidinediones, empagliflozin
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors
Excess thyroxine
Aromatase inhibitors
Tamoxifen (when used in pre-menopausal women)
Gonadotropin-releasing hormone
Chemotherapy
Immunosuppressants: cyclosporine, tacrolimus, methotrexate
Lithium
Heparin
Proton pump inhibitors
Aluminium-containing antacids
Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate
Antipsychotics
Identifying the cause
When a patient has clinical evidence of an underlying cause of osteoporosis, the necessary investigations may be straightforward. In an otherwise healthy patient with no specific clinical signs, a range of investigations may be required to identify a secondary cause of osteoporosis.
The prevalence of undiagnosed secondary causes of osteoporosis is unknown and there are no guidelines regarding appropriate laboratory tests for the otherwise healthy patient. In any patient suspected of having secondary osteoporosis, most experts recommend evaluation of bone and mineral metabolism with blood tests for calcium, phosphate, alkaline phosphatase, 25-hydroxyvitamin D, parathyroid hormone, liver and kidney function, full blood count and thyroid-stimulating hormone.
In those with severe osteoporosis (multiple fractures or bone mineral density T-score <–3.0) without specific clinical findings, additional tests should be performed. These tests include serum protein electrophoresis, free light chain assay, markers of inflammation, coeliac serology and total IgA, sex steroids (testosterone in men and oestradiol in women) and 24-hour urinary free cortisol.3-7 A 24-hour urinary calcium collection is indicated if there are abnormalities of serum calcium or parathyroid hormone.
The role of bone turnover markers, such as telopeptides, in the diagnosis of osteoporosis is controversial. Currently, in specialists’ clinics, their clinical role is in monitoring treatment efficacy.8
Several small cross-sectional studies have evaluated the yield of combined laboratory investigations in identifying an underlying cause of osteoporosis in otherwise asymptomatic patients. In studies of 1739 and 2044 postmenopausal women, the three most common findings were hypercalciuria, malabsorption (vitamin D deficiency) and hyperparathyroidism.
In the study of 204 women, hyperparathyroidism was detected in 35%, although less than 10% had primary hyperparathyroidism with hypercalcaemia.4 A cost-benefit analysis of the investigations was not performed in either of these studies.4,9 There are no large studies assessing the frequency and cost–benefit of investigations for secondary osteoporosis.
Bone biopsy
In the past, bone histomorphometry was commonly used to assess the severity of osteoporosis before the advent of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry.
Bone biopsies are now rarely performed. In a highly select group of patients, bone biopsy performed and interpreted by an experienced specialist is useful in establishing the underlying aetiology and appropriate therapy of atypical cases if non-invasive methods have been inconclusive. Bone histomorphometry is a specialist tool to diagnose and assess:
osteomalacia
renal bone disease
bone turnover (to differentiate between low- and high-turnover osteoporosis) with potential impact on therapeutic options.
In one specialist centre, 99 transiliac bone biopsies were performed over 14 years on ‘atypical’ cases of osteoporosis.10 This represented 0.003% of patients reviewed for bone-related consultations.
Bone marrow and trephine biopsy is only required to exclude an underlying haematological cause for osteoporosis such as plasma cell dyscrasia, lymphoma or mastocyte disorders which will require specific therapies.
Conclusion
Secondary causes of osteoporosis are less common than primary osteoporosis, but correctly treating an underlying cause may be sufficient to ameliorate the increased fracture risk. Underlying causes should be suspected in patients with very low bone mineral density or in those without ‘traditional’ risk factors for fractures.
Confirming the diagnosis requires a careful history and physical examination for evidence of known causes and can be confirmed with selected laboratory investigations.
Footnotes
Conflict of interest: none declared
References
- 1.Fitzpatrick LA. Secondary causes of osteoporosis. Mayo Clin Proc 2002;77:453-68. 10.1016/S0025-6196(11)62214-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Polymeris A, Michalakis K, Sarantopoulou V. Secondary osteoporosis - an endocrinological approach focusing on underlying mechanisms. Endocr Regul 2013;47:137-48. 10.4149/endo_2013_03_137 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Adler RA. Laboratory testing for secondary osteoporosis evaluation. Clin Biochem 2012;45:894-900. 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2012.01.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Cerdá Gabaroi D, Peris P, Monegal A, Albaladejo C, Martínez MA, Muxí A, et al. Search for hidden secondary causes in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Menopause 2010;17:135-9. 10.1097/gme.0b013e3181ade8e5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ferrari S, Bianchi ML, Eisman JA, Foldes AJ, Adami S, Wahl DA, et al. IOF Committee of Scientific Advisors Working Group on Osteoporosis Pathophysiology . Osteoporosis in young adults: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management. Osteoporos Int 2012;23:2735-48. 10.1007/s00198-012-2030-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hofbauer LC, Hamann C, Ebeling PR. Approach to the patient with secondary osteoporosis. Eur J Endocrinol 2010;162:1009-20. 10.1530/EJE-10-0015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners. Clinical guideline for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women and older men. Melbourne: RACGP; 2010. http://www.racgp.org.au/ your-practice/guidelines/musculoskeletal/osteoporosis [cited 2016 May 1]
- 8.Lee J, Vasikaran S. Current recommendations for laboratory testing and use of bone turnover markers in management of osteoporosis. Ann Lab Med 2012;32:105-12. 10.3343/alm.2012.32.2.105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Tannenbaum C, Clark J, Schwartzman K, Wallenstein S, Lapinski R, Meier D, et al. Yield of laboratory testing to identify secondary contributors to osteoporosis in otherwise healthy women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002;87:4431-7. 10.1210/jc.2002-020275 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kann PH, Pfützner A, Delling G, Schulz G, Meyer S. Transiliac bone biopsy in osteoporosis: frequency, indications, consequences and complications. An evaluation of 99 consecutive cases over a period of 14 years. Clin Rheumatol 2006;25:30-4. 10.1007/s10067-005-1132-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]