Skip to main content
The Journal of Reproduction and Development logoLink to The Journal of Reproduction and Development
. 2016 Mar 13;62(3):297–303. doi: 10.1262/jrd.2015-159

Liver receptor homolog 1 influences blastocyst hatching in pigs

Jing GUO 1, Ming-Hui ZHAO 1, Shuang LIANG 1, Jeong-Woo CHOI 1, Nam-Hyung KIM 1, Xiang-Shun CUI 1
PMCID: PMC4919294  PMID: 26971889

Abstract

Liver receptor homolog 1 (Lrh1, also known as Nr5a2) belongs to the orphan nuclear receptor superfamily and has diverse functions in development, metabolism, and cell differentiation and death. Lrh1 regulates the expression of Oct4, which is a key factor of early embryonic differentiation. However, the role of Lrh1 in early development of mammalian embryo is unknown. In the present study, the localization, Lrh1 mRNA expression, and LRH1 protein levels in porcine early parthenotes were examined by immunofluorescence and real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction. To determine the role of Lrh1 in porcine early embryo development, the parthenotes were treated with the specific LRH1 antagonist 505601. The immunofluorescence signal for LRH1 was only observed in the nucleus of blastocysts. The blastocyst developmental rate in the presence of 50 and 100 μM 505601 was significantly lower than that in the control group. The blastocyst hatching rate was also reduced in the presence of 50 and 100 μM 505601 than that under control conditions. The latter effect was possibly due to the decreased expression of hatching-related genes such as Fn1, Itgα5, and Cox2 upon the inhibition of Lrh1. Incubation with the LRH1 antagonist also increased the number of apoptotic cells among the blastocysts. Moreover, LRH1 inhibition enhanced the expression of the pro-apoptotic genes Bax and Casp3, and reduced the expression of the anti-apoptotic gene Bcl2. Lrh1 inhibition also led to significant decrease in the expression levels of Oct4 mRNA and octamer-binding transcription factor 4 (OCT4) protein in the blastocysts. In conclusion, Lrh1 affects blastocyst formation and hatching in porcine embryonic development through the regulation of OCT4 expression and cell apoptosis.

Keywords: Apoptosis, Hatching, LRH1, Octamer-binding transcription factor 4 (OCT4), Pig


Blastocyst hatching from the zona pellucida is a critical event during the attachment of the blastocyst to the uterine epithelium before implantation [1]. Any dysregulation of the hatching process causes implantation failure, which leads to infertility [2]. Blastocyst hatching is controlled by an extremely complicated interplay of various cellular factors and biomolecules, which are regulated in a defined spatio-temporal fashion [3].

Liver receptor homolog 1 (Lrh1, also known as Nr5a2) belongs to the orphan nuclear receptor superfamily and has diverse functions in the development, metabolism, and cell differentiation and death. Lrh1 plays important roles in bile acid biosynthesis [4], cholesterol metabolism [5], and glucose sensing [6] in the liver. In the ovaries, Lrh1 regulates steroid synthesis [7], pregnancy time course [8], maturation of ovarian follicles, and ovulation [9]. Lrh1 is also a critical factor in embryonic development. Mice with a homozygous null mutation of the Lrh1 gene die on around embryonic day 7.5 and exhibit pathological features typical of visceral endoderm dysfunction [10].

Several studies have demonstrated that Lrh1 is highly expressed in embryonic stem cells (ESCs). In cooperation with its partner Dax1, Lrh1 activates the transcription of Oct4, which encodes the key factor for maintaining the pluripotency of mouse ESCs [11-13]. Lrh1 acts upstream of Oct4 and regulates Oct4 expression during the epiblast stage of mouse embryonic development [14]. In addition, Lrh1 not only increases the reprogramming efficiency, but also substitutes for exogenous Oct4 in reprogramming mouse embryonic fibroblasts to induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), which further underscores the relationship between the two genes and highlights the important role of Lrh1 in regulating Oct4 and maintaining pluripotency [15]. On the other hand, Oct4 is essential for porcine embryo development, as can be inferred from the effects of Oct4 small interfering RNA treatment on porcine blastocyst formation [16]. Overexpression of Oct4 enhances the proliferation of porcine embryos [17], however, the function of Lrh1 in porcine blastocyst formation is still unknown. We hypothesized that Lrh1 plays a critical role in porcine early embryonic development by regulating the expression of the octamer-binding transcription factor 4 (OCT4).

Several studies have addressed the function of Lrh1 in the regulation of ESC pluripotency and differentiation, however little information is available on the actions of Lrh1 in porcine early embryo development. It has been demonstrated that porcine parthenogenetic diploids can develop to the blastocyst stage just as in fertilized porcine embryos [18]. Furthermore, researchers have shown the successful development of parthenogenetic porcine embryos to the post-implantation stage [19]. However, porcine embryos of homogeneous quality are difficult to obtain because of the relatively high incidence of polyspermy during in vitro fertilization (IVF) [20]. Therefore, parthenogenetic diploids could be used as model embryos for early development studies in pigs [21]. To investigate the developmental role of Lrh1, parthenotes were treated with a specific LRH1 antagonist and the blastocyst formation and OCT4 expression levels were analyzed. We demonstrated that Lrh1 may play an important role in blastocyst formation and hatching through the regulation of OCT4 and apoptosis. Therefore, Lrh1 is possibly a critical factor in early porcine embryo development.

Materials and Methods

Oocyte collection, in vitro maturation, and embryo culture

Ovaries from prepubertal gilts were obtained from a local slaughterhouse, maintained in saline at 37°C, and transported to the laboratory. Cumulus oocyte complexes (COCs) were isolated from follicles and washed three times in Tyrode’s lactate-4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid. The COCs were cultured in tissue culture medium 199 (TCM 199) supplemented with 10% porcine follicular fluid, 0.1 g/l sodium pyruvate, 0.6 mM L-cysteine, 10 ng/ml epidermal growth factor, 10 IU/ml luteinizing hormone, and 10 IU/ml follicle stimulating hormone at 38.5°C for 44 h in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 and 95% air. After maturation, cumulus cells were removed by treatment with 0.1% hyaluronidase for 2–3 min and repeated pipetting. For parthenogenetic activation, oocytes with polar bodies were selected and activated by two direct current (DC) pulses of 1.1 kV/cm for 60 µsec and then incubated in the porcine zygote medium (PZM-5) containing 7.5 μg/ml of cytochalasin B for 3 h. Finally, the embryos were cultured in PZM-5 medium for 8 days at 38.5°C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 and 95% air. On the fifth day, fetal bovine serum (FBS) was added to the medium to a total concentration of 4%. To observe the effect of LRH1 on porcine early embryo development, the LRH1 antagonist 505601 (Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany) was added to the medium used for parthenogenic activation to obtain final concentrations of 50 or 100 μM.

Real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction

Twenty oocytes and 40 embryos were collected initially (at 0 h) and after culturing the oocytes for 48 h. The oocytes had been activated for 24, 30, 43, or 144 h corresponding to the GV, MII, one-cell, two-cell, four-cell, and blastocyst stages, respectively. mRNA was extracted from 10 oocytes per group with a Dynabeads mRNA Direct Kit (DynalAsa, Oslo, Norway) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. cDNA was obtained by reverse transcription of the mRNA using the Oligo (dT)12-18 primer and SuperScript TM III Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY, USA). The amplification cycles used were as follows: 95°C for 3 min followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 sec, 60°C for 30 sec, and 72°C for 20 sec, and a final extension at 72°C for 5 min. The relative quantification of gene expression was normalized to internal porcine Gapdh mRNA levels using the 2−ΔΔCT method. The primers used to amplify each gene are shown in Table 1.

Table 1. List of primers used for real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction.

Gene Primer Sequence (5′–3′) Annealing temperature (°C) Product size (bp)
Lrh1 F:GGTACCACTATGGGCTCCTCAC
R:TCGGCCCTTACCGCTTCT
60 193
Fn1 F:AGGGCGATGAACCACAGT
R:GCTCCAGCGAACGACAAT
60 221
Itgα5 F:TGATGACAGTTATTTGGGCTAC
R:CAAAGTCCTCGCTGCTCT
60 100
Cox2 F:GGCTGCGGGAACATAATAGA
R:GCAGCTCTGGGTCAAACTTC
55 183
Bcl2 F:GCCGAAATGTTTGCTGAC
R:GCCGATCTCGAAGGAAGT
60 154
Bax F:GATCGAGCAGGGCGAATG
R:GGGCCTTGAGCACCAGTTTA
60 277
Casp3 F:GACGGACAGTGGGACTGAAGA
R:GCCAGGAATAGTAACCAGGTGC
60 101
Oct4 F: CCCCGCCCTATGACTTCT
R: TAGGAGCTTGGCAAATTGTTC
60 269
F-actin F:AGTTCACCATCACACCACCTACA
R:CTTGGCAGTTTGGGCTTCATTC
60 146
Gapdh F: TTCCACGGCACAGTCAAG
R: ATACTCAGCACCAGCATCG
60 117

Immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy

Oocytes and embryos were fixed in 3.7% paraformaldehyde for 20 min at room temperature, permeabilized with phosphate buffered saline/polyvinyl alcohol (PBS/PVA) containing 1.0% Triton X-100 at 37°C for 1 h, and then incubated in PVA-PBS containing 3.0% bovine serum albumin at 37°C for 1 h. Subsequently, the oocytes and embryos were incubated overnight at 4°C with an anti-LRH1 antibody (ab153944, 1:100; Abcam, Cambridge, UK) and an anti-OCT4 antibody (sc8628, 1:100; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, CA, USA). After washing three times in PBS/PVA, the oocytes and embryos were incubated at 37°C for 1 h with either goat anti-rabbit IgG or rabbit anti-goat IgG. The oocytes and embryos were then stained with Hoechst 33342 for 5 min, washed three times in PBS/PVA, mounted onto slides, and examined using a confocal microscope (Zeiss LSM 710 META, Jena, Germany). Images were processed using Zen software (version 8.0, Zeiss, Jena, Germany).

Terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase-mediated 2'-deoxyuridine 5'-triphosphate (dUTP) nick-end labeling (TUNEL) assay

After the oocytes were treated with different concentrations of the LRH1 antagonist, the blastocysts were collected. The blastocysts were fixed in 3.7% paraformaldehyde for 30 min at room temperature and then permeabilized by incubation in 1% Triton X-100 for 1 h at 37°C. The embryos were incubated with fluorescein-conjugated dUTP and the terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase enzyme (In Situ Cell Death Detection Kit, Roche, Mannheim, Germany) for 1 h at 37°C and then washed three times in PBS/PVA. Embryos were treated with Hoechst 33342 for 5 min to stain the DNA, washed three times in PBS/PVA, and mounted onto glass slides. Images were captured using a confocal microscope.

Statistical analysis

All data were analyzed with a one-way analysis of variance and differences between the treatment groups were assessed by the least significant difference test using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software. Each experiment was performed at least in triplicate and differences were considered to be significant if P < 0.05.

Results

Expression and localization of Lrh1 in porcine embryos

Before investigating the function of Lrh1 in early embryo development, the expression level and subcellular localization of this protein were initially examined. As shown in Fig. 1A, Lrh1 mRNA was expressed throughout porcine oocyte maturation and the early embryo developmental stages, although, these expression levels were significantly higher at the blastocyst stage than during other embryonic stages. To investigate the subcellular localization of the LRH1 protein, porcine embryos at different stages were cultured and processed for immunofluorescent staining. An anti-LRH1 antibody was used to detect LRH1 localization (Fig. 1B). An LRH1 immunofluorescence signal was only observed in the nucleus of the blastocysts, but not during other stages. On the basis of these findings, we concluded that Lrh1 may play a role during the pre-implantation stage.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Lrh1 mRNA expression and localization in porcine oocytes and early embryos at various developmental stages. (A) mRNA was collected during different phases of porcine embryo development. (B) Laser scanning confocal microscopy images of liver receptor homolog 1 immunostaining during the MII, 2C, 4C, and blastocyst stages. GV, MII, 1C, 2C, 4C, and BL indicate germinal vesicle, meiosis II, one-cell stage, two-cell stage, four-cell stage, and the blastocyst, respectively. ** indicates statistically significant difference (P < 0.01) from GV. Data are presented as the mean (± standard deviation of the mean) of three independent experiments.

Effect of Lrh1 on the development of porcine parthenotes

In order to investigate the functions of Lrh1 in development, parthenotes were treated with different concentrations of the LRH1-specific antagonist 505601. No significant differences in the developmental rates for the two-cell and four-cell stages were observed between the treatment and control groups. However, the blastocyst development rates in the presence of 50 and 100 μM of 505601 (37.30 ± 3.67% and 20.10 ± 2.81%, respectively) were significantly lower than that of the control group (53.43 ± 3.67%, Fig. 2A). The blastocyst hatching rates were also reduced (P < 0.01) by the treatment with 50 or 100 μM 505601 (12.66 ± 3.13% and 20.10 ± 2.81%, respectively) from the hatching rate in the control (40.59 ± 0.59%).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

The effect of liver receptor homolog 1 (LRH1) inhibition on the embryo development. The parthenotes were treated with the specific LRH1 antagonist 505601 in concentrations of 50 or 100 μM. (A) The percentages of those in the two-cell, four-cell, blastocyst, and hatching blastocyst stages are shown by bars. (B) The images of embryos treated with different concentrations of 505601 are shown. (C) Expression of Fn1, Itgα5, and Cox2 mRNA in hatching blastocysts in the presence or absence of the LRH1 antagonist. Statistical significance of the differences from the control group is indicated as follows: * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, and *** P < 0.001. Data are presented as the mean (± standard deviation of the mean) of three independent experiments.

In order to detect the mechanism of Lrh1’s influence on blastocyst hatching, the expression of hatching-related genes was examined. As illustrated in Fig. 2C, the expression levels of the hatching-related genes Fn1, Itgα5, and Cox2 were significantly lower in the treatment group than in the control group (P < 0.01).

Effect of Lrh1 on the porcine blastocyst quality

The quality of the blastocysts was further evaluated based on Gardner’s criteria [22]. Blastocysts were graded on a scale of 1 to 6 and the grade depended on their degree of expansion and hatching status as follows: 1, an early blastocyst without a full blastocoel volume, which occupies less than a half of the embryo; 2, a blastocyst with a blastocoel volume, which occupies at least half (or more) of the embryo; 3, a full blastocyst with a blastocoel completely filling the embryo; 4, an expanded blastocyst with a blastocoel, which is larger than the volume of the early embryo, with a thinning zona pellucida; 5, a hatching blastocyst with the trophectoderm, which begins to hatch from the zona pellucida; and 6, a hatched blastocyst, which completely escaped from the zona pellucida. The distribution of the blastocyst quality scores is shown in Fig. 3A. In the present study, there was a significant decrease in the number of high quality blastocysts and an increase in the number of low quality blastocysts following the inhibition of LRH1 (Fig. 3B). A blastocyst score from 4 to 6 was a sign of a high quality blastocyst. Blastocysts of lower quality received scores from 1 to 3. The fraction of high quality blastocysts was significantly lower in the presence of 50 and 100 μM of 505601 (32.48 ± 0.81%; 34.85 ± 1.5%, respectively) than that fraction in the control group (56.41 ± 6.41%).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Effect of pharmacological inhibition of liver receptor homolog 1 (LRH1) on porcine blastocysts. (A) Blastocyst quality was examined in the presence or absence of the LRH1 antagonist. Black and white bars indicate high and low quality blastocysts, respectively (P < 0.05). (B) Blastocysts were graded on a scale from 1 to 6 as illustrated. Different scores were indicated by the respective numbers. Ctrl, control; 50, 50 μM; 100, 100 μM.

Effect of Lrh1 on apoptosis in porcine blastocysts

Previous studies showed that blastocyst hatching was influenced by the blastocyst cell number [23], therefore the effect of Lrh1 on this parameter was investigated (Fig. 4A). The total blastocyst cell number in the control group (40.67 ± 2.84) was significantly higher (P < 0.05) than that observed in the presence of 50 (28.25 ± 2.53) or 100 μM of 505601 (27.00 ± 4.95). Thus, the blastocyst hatching after treatment with an LRH1 antagonist may be associated with the total blastocyst cell number.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Effect of liver receptor homolog 1 (LRH1) on apoptosis. (A) The total number of blastocyst cells and the fraction of apoptotic cells were examined. (B) Laser scanning confocal microscopy images of nuclei and fragmented DNA in samples from the control group and the LRH1-antagonist-treated group. (C) Expression of Bax, Bcl2, and Casp3 mRNA in porcine blastocysts during in vitro culturing with or without the LRH1 antagonist. Statistical significance of differences from the control group is indicated as follows: * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01. Data are presented as the mean (± standard deviation of the mean) of three independent experiments. Ctrl, control; 50, 50 μM; 100, 100 μM.

Since the inhibition of LRH1 by 505601 decreased the total blastocyst cell number, we next investigated if this pharmacological manipulation affected apoptosis. The number of apoptotic cells per blastocyst was checked on the eighth day after parthenogenetic activation in the treatment and control groups. The number of apoptotic cells was significantly lower (P < 0.05) in the control group (3.00 ± 0.82) than in the groups treated with 50 (6.00 ± 0.71) or 100 μM (6.00 ± 0.75) of 505601 (Fig. 4B). Therefore, we concluded that the inhibition of LRH1 increased the apoptotic rate of the blastocysts.

In order to understand the mechanism by which Lrh1 exerts this effect on apoptosis, the expression of three critical apoptotic genes, Bax, Casp3, and Bcl2, was analyzed. LRH1 inhibition enhanced the expression of the pro-apoptotic genes Bax and Casp3 (P < 0.05) and reduced the expression of the anti-apoptotic gene Bcl2 (P < 0.01). Thus, Lrh1 could regulate apoptosis via modulation of the expression of the apoptosis-related genes Bax, Casp3, and Bcl2.

Effect of Lrh1 on the expression of OCT4 in porcine blastocysts

The expression levels of OCT4 mRNA and protein were analyzed following treatment with the LRH1 antagonist 505601. The Oct4 mRNA expression was significantly lower in the LRH1 antagonist-treated embryos than in the control, untreated embryos (P < 0.001, Fig. 5A). Consistent with the data on mRNA expression, weaker expression of the OCT4 protein was observed at the blastocyst stage in the LRH1 antagonist-treated embryos than in the untreated embryos (Fig. 5B).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

The mRNA and protein expression levels of octamer-binding transcription factor 4 (OCT4). Relative Oct4 mRNA expression level and laser scanning confocal microscopy images of immunostaining for the OCT4 protein in porcine blastocysts during treatments with different concentrations of the liver receptor homolog 1 (LRH1) antagonist. *** indicates statistically significant difference (P < 0.001) from the control group. Data are presented as the mean (± standard deviation of the mean) of three independent experiments. Ctrl, control; LRH1i, inhibition of LRH1; 50, 50 μM; 100, 100 μM.

Discussion

In mammals, blastocysts must hatch from the zona pellucida before implantation for further development. Blastocyst hatching is an essential event for the subsequent viability and development of the embryo [24]. Although it is vital to understand the mechanism of hatching in detail, in-depth studies of this critical process are still scarce. In the present study, we discovered that the activity of Lrh1, a novel transcription factor, affects blastocyst hatching. It has been reported previously that mice bearing a homozygous null mutation in the Lrh1 gene die on embryonic days 6.5–7.5. This observation shows that Lrh1 is likely to play an important role in embryo development [10]. The structure-based discovery of LRH1 antagonists has identified ligands that inhibit Lrh1 transcriptional activity and diminish the expression of the receptor’s target genes [25, 26]. Therefore, several studies have used LRH1 antagonists to investigate the receptor’s biological function[25]. In the present study, the treatment of porcine parthenotes with an LRH1-specific antagonist had a negative effect on blastocyst formation and quality; therefore, our data support the notion that Lrh1 affects the developmental capacity of the embryo. Furthermore, decrease in the hatching rate that we observed upon LRH1 inhibition can lead to implantation failure.

. In the present study, the mRNA expression levels of several hatching-related genes, i.e. Fn1, Itgα5, and Cox2, were significantly smaller in the experimental groups treated with an LRH1 antagonist than in the control, untreated groups. The FN1 protein is produced by the trophoblast cells of the blastocyst, and the interaction of this protein with integrins is critically important for the attachment of the embryo to the maternal endometrium during successful implantation [27]. FN1 is an important bridging ligand providing the Arg-Gly-Asp integrin recognition site for apically-expressed integrins in the endometrium and the embryo [28]. Itgα5 is a major fibronectin receptor, and Cox2 is another key factor for blastocyst hatching. Prostacyclin synthesized by Cox2 plays an important role in embryo development during preimplantation and blastocyst hatching [29]. The selective pharmacological inhibition of Cox2 completely blocks blastocyst hatching [30]. Hence, we postulate that Lrh1 regulates blastocyst hatching through its effect on the expression of Fn1, Itgα5, and Cox2, which are followed by the attachment of the embryo to the uterine endometrium.

There is a direct correlation between blastocyst quality and blastocyst hatching [22]. In the presence of an LRH1 antagonist in the culture medium, the fraction of good quality blastocysts was smaller than that in control conditions. Furthermore, blastocyst hatching is influenced by the blastocyst cell number [23], and apoptosis in the early embryo has an important impact on embryo development [31]. It is possible that LRH1 inhibition caused a failure of embryo competence because of the enhancement of the apoptotic rate. In support of this, LRH1 inhibition upregulated the expression of the proapoptotic genes Bax and Casp3 and decreased the expression levels of Bcl2, an anti-apoptotic gene. These observations suggest that the natural activity of intact Lrh1 is to enhance blastocyst vitality.

Blastocysts escape from the zona pellucida and form a compact inner cell mass (ICM) [32]. Oct4 is a key factor in ICM formation. It should be noted that mouse embryos with a homozygous null mutation in the Oct4 gene die around the time of the implantation stage [33]. Previous studies have demonstrated that the expression of the Oct4 gene was regulated by Lrh1, as knockdown of the Lrh1 gene decreased Oct4 expression [15]. In the present study, the pharmacological inhibition of LRH1 during early porcine embryonic development resulted in decreased expression of OCT4 protein and mRNA. Regulation of the Oct4 expression level by Lrh1 may be mediated by a canonical Wnt/β-catenin-dependent pathway, which has been shown to be involved in the hatching of pig blastocysts [34, 35]. Therefore, we hypothesized that Lrh1 affects blastocyst hatching through the regulation of Oct4 expression via the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway.

In summary, we revealed an important role of Lrh1, an orphan nuclear receptor superfamily member, in early porcine embryo development, especially during blastocyst formation and hatching. The present study demonstrated that Lrh1 influenced early embryo development by regulating apoptosis and OCT4 expression. In the future, further experiments will be necessary to understand the pathways involved in the Lrh1 regulation of blastocyst hatching; this will be particularly necessary to validate the application of LRH1 antagonists to improve porcine IVF cycles suffering from hatching problems.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grant from the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (No. 2015R1D1A1A01057629), Republic of Korea.

References

  • 1.Seshagiri PB, Sen Roy S, Sireesha G, Rao RP. Cellular and molecular regulation of mammalian blastocyst hatching. J Reprod Immunol 2009; 83: 79–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Petersen CG, Mauri AL, Baruffi RL, Oliveira JB, Massaro FC, Elder K, Franco JG., Jr Implantation failures: success of assisted hatching with quarter-laser zona thinning. Reprod Biomed Online 2005; 10: 224–229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Simón C, Gimeno MJ, Mercader A, Francés A, Garcia Velasco J, Remohí J, Polan ML, Pellicer A. Cytokines-adhesion molecules-invasive proteinases. The missing paracrine/autocrine link in embryonic implantation? Mol Hum Reprod 1996; 2: 405–424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lu TT, Makishima M, Repa JJ, Schoonjans K, Kerr TA, Auwerx J, Mangelsdorf DJ. Molecular basis for feedback regulation of bile acid synthesis by nuclear receptors. Mol Cell 2000; 6: 507–515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mataki C, Magnier BC, Houten SM, Annicotte J-S, Argmann C, Thomas C, Overmars H, Kulik W, Metzger D, Auwerx J, Schoonjans K. Compromised intestinal lipid absorption in mice with a liver-specific deficiency of liver receptor homolog 1. Mol Cell Biol 2007; 27: 8330–8339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Oosterveer MH, Mataki C, Yamamoto H, Harach T, Moullan N, van Dijk TH, Ayuso E, Bosch F, Postic C, Groen AK, Auwerx J, Schoonjans K. LRH-1-dependent glucose sensing determines intermediary metabolism in liver. J Clin Invest 2012; 122: 2817–2826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Saxena D, Escamilla-Hernandez R, Little-Ihrig L, Zeleznik AJ. Liver receptor homolog-1 and steroidogenic factor-1 have similar actions on rat granulosa cell steroidogenesis. Endocrinology 2007; 148: 726–734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zhang C, Large MJ, Duggavathi R, DeMayo FJ, Lydon JP, Schoonjans K, Kovanci E, Murphy BD. Liver receptor homolog-1 is essential for pregnancy. Nat Med 2013; 19: 1061–1066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Duggavathi R, Volle DH, Mataki C, Antal MC, Messaddeq N, Auwerx J, Murphy BD, Schoonjans K. Liver receptor homolog 1 is essential for ovulation. Genes Dev 2008; 22: 1871–1876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Paré J-F, Malenfant D, Courtemanche C, Jacob-Wagner M, Roy S, Allard D, Bélanger L. The fetoprotein transcription factor (FTF) gene is essential to embryogenesis and cholesterol homeostasis and is regulated by a DR4 element. J Biol Chem 2004; 279: 21206–21216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wang J, Rao S, Chu J, Shen X, Levasseur DN, Theunissen TW, Orkin SH. A protein interaction network for pluripotency of embryonic stem cells. Nature 2006; 444: 364–368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Niakan KK, Davis EC, Clipsham RC, Jiang M, Dehart DB, Sulik KK, McCabe ER. Novel role for the orphan nuclear receptor Dax1 in embryogenesis, different from steroidogenesis. Mol Genet Metab 2006; 88: 261–271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kelly VR, Hammer GD. LRH-1 and Nanog regulate Dax1 transcription in mouse embryonic stem cells. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2011; 332: 116–124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gu P, Goodwin B, Chung AC-K, Xu X, Wheeler DA, Price RR, Galardi C, Peng L, Latour AM, Koller BH, Gossen J, Kliewer SA, Cooney AJ. Orphan nuclear receptor LRH-1 is required to maintain Oct4 expression at the epiblast stage of embryonic development. Mol Cell Biol 2005; 25: 3492–3505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Heng J-CD, Feng B, Han J, Jiang J, Kraus P, Ng J-H, Orlov YL, Huss M, Yang L, Lufkin T, Lim B, Ng HH. The nuclear receptor Nr5a2 can replace Oct4 in the reprogramming of murine somatic cells to pluripotent cells. Cell Stem Cell 2010; 6: 167–174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sakurai N, Fujii T, Hashizume T, Sawai K. Effects of downregulating oct-4 transcript by RNA interference on early development of porcine embryos. J Reprod Dev 2013; 59: 353–360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kim SJ, Koo OJ, Park HJ, Moon JH, da Torre BR, Javaregowda PK, Kang JT, Park SJ, Saadeldin IM, Choi JY, Lee BC, Jang G. Oct4 overexpression facilitates proliferation of porcine fibroblasts and development of cloned embryos. Zygote 2015; 23: 704–711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kure-Bayashi S, Miyake M, Katayama M, Miyano T, Kato S. Development of porcine blastocysts from in vitro- matured and activated haploid and diploid oocytes. Theriogenology 1996; 46: 1027–1036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kure-bayashi S, Miyake M, Okada K, Kato S. Successful implantation of in vitro-matured, electro-activated oocytes in the pig. Theriogenology 2000; 53: 1105–1119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Van Thuan N, Harayama H, Miyake M. Characteristics of preimplantational development of porcine parthenogenetic diploids relative to the existence of amino acids in vitro. Biol Reprod 2002; 67: 1688–1698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Cui XS, Kim NH. Epidermal growth factor induces Bcl-xL gene expression and reduces apoptosis in porcine parthenotes developing in vitro. Mol Reprod Dev 2003; 66: 273–278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Gardner DK, Lane M, Stevens J, Schlenker T, Schoolcraft WB. Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril 2000; 73: 1155–1158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Montag M, Koll B, Holmes P, van der Ven H. Significance of the number of embryonic cells and the state of the zona pellucida for hatching of mouse blastocysts in vitro versus in vivo. Biol Reprod 2000; 62: 1738–1744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Enders AC, Schlafke S. A morphological analysis of the early implantation stages in the rat. Am J Anat 1967; 120: 185–225. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Benod C, Carlsson J, Uthayaruban R, Hwang P, Irwin JJ, Doak AK, Shoichet BK, Sablin EP, Fletterick RJ. Structure-based discovery of antagonists of nuclear receptor LRH-1. J Biol Chem 2013; 288: 19830–19844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Fletterick RJ. Inhibition of Pancreatic Cancer Cell Proliferation by LRH-1 Inhibitors. DTIC Document; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Schultz JF, Mayernik L, Rout UK, Armant DR. Integrin trafficking regulates adhesion to fibronectin during differentiation of mouse peri-implantation blastocysts. Dev Genet 1997; 21: 31–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kaneko Y, Murphy CR, Day ML. Extracellular matrix proteins secreted from both the endometrium and the embryo are required for attachment: a study using a co-culture model of rat blastocysts and Ishikawa cells. J Morphol 2013; 274: 63–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Pakrasi PL, Jain AK. Evaluation of cyclooxygenase 2 derived endogenous prostacyclin in mouse preimplantation embryo development in vitro. Life Sci 2007; 80: 1503–1507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Huang J-C, Wun W-SA, Goldsby JS, Matijevic-Aleksic N, Wu KK. Cyclooxygenase-2-derived endogenous prostacyclin enhances mouse embryo hatching. Hum Reprod 2004; 19: 2900–2906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Haouzi D, Hamamah S. Pertinence of apoptosis markers for the improvement of in vitro fertilization (IVF). Curr Med Chem 2009; 16: 1905–1916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Vejlsted M, Du Y, Vajta G, Maddox-Hyttel P. Post-hatching development of the porcine and bovine embryo—defining criteria for expected development in vivo and in vitro. Theriogenology 2006; 65: 153–165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kehler J, Tolkunova E, Koschorz B, Pesce M, Gentile L, Boiani M, Lomelí H, Nagy A, McLaughlin KJ, Schöler HR, Tomilin A. Oct4 is required for primordial germ cell survival. EMBO Rep 2004; 5: 1078–1083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Huang Y, Ouyang H, Xie W, Chen X, Yao C, Han Y, Han X, Song Q, Pang D, Tang X. Moderate expression of Wnt signaling genes is essential for porcine parthenogenetic embryo development. Cell Signal 2013; 25: 778–785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Lim KT, Gupta MK, Lee SH, Jung YH, Han DW, Lee HT. Possible involvement of Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in hatching and trophectoderm differentiation of pig blastocysts. Theriogenology 2013; 79: 284–290.e2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Reproduction and Development are provided here courtesy of The Society for Reproduction and Development

RESOURCES