Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jun 24.
Published in final edited form as: Neurotoxicology. 2012 Jun;33(3):512–513. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2012.05.002

Considerations on methylmercury (MeHg) treatments in in vitro studies

Michael Aschner 1,*
PMCID: PMC4919664  NIHMSID: NIHMS795461  PMID: 22608940

It is quite often that as researchers performing in vitro studies we are asked by reviewers of a manuscript or a grant proposal “what is the physiological relevance of the concentrations you use?” Indeed, it is incumbent upon the author to provide and prove the physiological relevance of their studied compound. Having gone through a myriad of these scenarios, I take the liberty to provide you with a justification for the in vitro concentrations of one of my favorite compounds, methylmercury. I encourage others with their preferred compound to apply the same exercise. To avoid future criticisms, please feel free to incorporate this description into you grant or paper.

Although a myriad of studies examined MeHg’s cellular effects, surprisingly few have measured Hg concentrations. In astrocytes treated for 24 h (hours) with high MeHg concentrations (10 μM) [Hg] were 124 ng/mg protein (Shapiro and Chan, 2008). In vivo rat studies demonstrated at birth neuropathologic damage and neurobehavioral alterations at brain Hg concentrations of 4.5 and 0.5 ppm, respectively (Castoldi et al., 2008). Perinatal MeHg treatment resulted in neonatal rat brain Hg concentrations of 3–11 ppm (Burbacher et al., 1990). In rats with behavioral alterations after continual pre-plus postnatal exposure [until postnatal day (PN16)] of 40 μg MeHg/kg/day, brain Hg concentrations were 0.5 ppm at birth and 0.04 ppm at weaning (Newland and Rasmussen, 2000); Six-month exposure to 0.5 ppm MeHg in drinking-water resulted in brain Hg concentrations of 5 ppm (Newland et al., 2006). In PN2 MeHg-treated mice, a single per os dose (4 mg/kg) led to cerebellar morphological changes and mean brain Hg concentrations of 1.8 and 0.1 ppm 24 h and 19 days post treatment, respectively (Sager et al., 1984). Forty-eight hours post oral MeHg administration (5 mg/kg/day for 8 days) to juvenile mice, cerebellar and cerebral Hg concentrations were 0.3 ppm (Toyama et al., 2011). In adult mice exhibiting neuropathologic changes after 8-week treatment with 30 ppm MeHg in drinking water, Hg concentrations in cerebellum, cerebral cortex and hippocampus were 10.9, 12.9 and 23.2 ppm, respectively (Fujimura et al., 2009). In children, delayed psychomotor development occurred at brain Hg concentrations <3 ppm (Burbacher et al., 1990). The threshold for observable clinical effects approximated brain Hg concentrations of 1 ppm (Burbacher et al., 1990) and the lowest-observed-adverse-effect-level (LOAEL) was at 0.5–1.0 ppm Hg (Lewandowski et al., 2003). In Seychellois asymptomatic neonates, brain total Hg concentrations ranged from 0.026 to 0.295 ppm (Lapham et al., 1995). Hg concentrations of 0.1–0.4 ppm were detected in infants from Minamata (Takeuchi, 1985; Takizawa, 1986) and in two Iraqi babies who died from in utero MeHg intoxication, brain Hg concentrations were ~1 and 13.7 ppm (Choi et al., 1978).

We performed the following calculations: protein content in cultured astrocytes is 0.006409 mg/million cells (unpublished data). Assuming an average cell radius of 2.25 μm and a volume of 31.01 × 10−9 μl, and crystalline protein s = ~0.65 (Matthews, 1974), we derive a protein content of 0.2067 mg/μl. This may vary by a factor of 2 dependent upon the cell size. If we apply this estimate, we calculate (using this conversion factor of 206.7 μM/(nmol/mg)) that a total brain Hg concentrations of 0.295 ppm (Lapham et al., 1995) corresponds to 1.48 ngHg/mg protein. The 0.4 ppm brain Hg concentrations detected in Japan (Takeuchi, 1985) corresponds to 2 ngHg/mg protein and the 13.7 ppm Hg concentrations in Iraq (Choi et al., 1978) to 68.5 ngHg/mg protein. If cellular Hg concentrations in your studies capture these sub-threshold and threshold toxic levels reported in the mammalian CNS, your studies are meritorious indeed.

Best of luck with your publications and grants!

Acknowledgments

M.A. was supported in part by NIH Grants, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences ES R01 07331 and the Molecular Toxicology Center ES P30 000267.

References

  1. Burbacher TM, Rodier PM, Weiss B. Methylmercury developmental neurotoxicity: a comparison of effects in humans and animals. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 1990;12:191–202. doi: 10.1016/0892-0362(90)90091-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Castoldi AF, Onishchenko N, Johansson C, Coccini T, Roda E, Vahter M, et al. Neurodevelopmental toxicity of methylmercury: laboratory animal data and their contribution to human risk assessment. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2008;51:215–29. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2008.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Choi BH, Lapham LW, Amin-Zaki L, Saleem T. Abnormal neuronal migration, deranged cerebral cortical organization, and diffuse white matter astrocytosis of human fetal brain: a major effect of methylmercury poisoning in utero. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1978;37:719–33. doi: 10.1097/00005072-197811000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fujimura M, Usuki F, Sawada M, Takashima A. Methylmercury induces neuropathological changes with tau hyperphosphorylation mainly through the activation of the c-jun-N-terminal kinase pathway in the cerebral cortex, but not in the hippocampus of the mouse brain. Neurotoxicology. 2009;30:1000–7. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2009.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lapham LW, Cernichiari E, Cox C, Myers GJ, Baggs RB, Brewer R, et al. An analysis of autopsy brain tissue from infants prenatally exposed to methymercury. Neurotoxicology. 1995;16:689–704. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lewandowski TA, Ponce RA, Charleston JS, Hong S, Faustman EM. Effect of methylmercury on midbrain cell proliferation during organogenesis: potential cross-species differences and implications for risk assessment. Toxicol Sci. 2003;75:124–33. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfg151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Matthews BW. Determination of molecular weight from protein crystals. J Mol Biol. 1974;82:513–26. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(74)90245-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Newland MC, Rasmussen EB. Aging unmasks adverse effects of gestational exposure to methylmercury in rats. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2000;22:819–28. doi: 10.1016/s0892-0362(00)00107-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Newland MC, Reed MN, LeBlanc A, Donlin WD. Brain and blood mercury and selenium after chronic and developmental exposure to methylmercury. Neurotoxicology. 2006;27:710–20. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2006.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Sager PR, Aschner M, Rodier PM. Persistent, differential alterations in developing cerebellar cortex of male and female mice after methylmercury exposure. Brain Res. 1984;314:1–11. doi: 10.1016/0165-3806(84)90170-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Shapiro AM, Chan HM. Characterization of demethylation of methylmercury in cultured astrocytes. Chemosphere. 2008;74:112–8. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.09.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Takeuchi T. Human effects of methylmercury as an environmental neurotoxicant. In: Blum K, Manzo L, editors. Neurotoxicology. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1985. pp. 345–67. [Google Scholar]
  13. Takizawa Y. Mercury content in recognized patients and non-recognized patients exposed to methylmercury from Minamata Bay in the last ten years. In: Tsubaki T, Takahashi H, editors. Recent advances in minamata disease studies. Tokyo: Kodansha Ltd; 1986. pp. 1–39. [Google Scholar]
  14. Toyama T, Shinkai Y, Yasutake A, Uchida K, Yamamoto M, Kumagai Y. Isothiocyanates reduce mercury accumulation via an Nrf2-dependent mechanism during exposure of mice to methylmercury. Environ Health Perspect. 2011;119:1117–22. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1003123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES