Abstract
Fibrosis is an ominous pathological process in failing myocardium, but its pathogenesis is poorly understood. We recently reported that loss of an extracellular matrix (ECM) protein, fibulin-2, protected against ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction (MI) in association with absence of activation of transforming growth factor (TGF)-β signaling and suppressed up-regulation of ECM protein expression during myocardial remodeling. Here, we investigated a role of fibulin-2 in the development of myocardial hypertrophy and fibrosis induced by continuous pressor-dosage of Ang II infusion. Both wild type (WT) and fibulin-2 null (Fbln2KO) mice developed comparable hypertension and myocardial hypertrophy by Ang II infusion. However, myocardial fibrosis with significant up-regulation of collagen type I and III mRNA was only seen in WT but not in Fbln2KO mice.Transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1 mRNA and its downstream signal, Smad2, were significantly up-regulated in WT by Ang II, whereas there were no Ang II-induced changes in Flbn2KO, suggesting fibulin-2 is necessary for Ang II-induced TGF-β signaling that induces myocardial fibrosis. To test whether fibulin-2 is sufficient for Ang II-induced TGF-β up-regulation, isolated Flbn2KO cardiac fibroblasts were treated with Ang II after transfecting with fibulin-2 expression vector or pretreating with recombinant fibulin-2 protein. Ang II-induced TGF-β signaling in Fbln2KO cells was partially rescued by exogenous fibulin-2, suggesting that fibulin-2 is required and probably sufficient for Ang II-induced TGF-β activation. Smad2 phosphorylation was induced just by adding recombinant fibulin-2 to KO cells, suggesting that extracellular interaction between fibulin-2 and latent TGF-β triggered initial TGF-β activation. Our study indicates that Ang II cannot induce TGF-β activation without fibulin-2 and that fibulin-2 plays an essential role in Ang II-induced TGF-β signaling and subsequent myocardial fibrosis. Fibulin-2 can be considered as a critical regulator of TGF-β that induces myocardial fibrosis.
Introduction
Heart failure is a progressive lethal disease that is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the modern world. Myocardial remodeling is a pathological process of the myocardium responsible for geometric changes in the ventricular chamber and resulting functional deterioration. A number of studies have implicated that angiotensin II (Ang II), a major bioactive peptide of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS), plays a central role in maintaining cardiovascular homeostasis1 and that its dysregulation results in pathological remodeling, especially myocardial fibrosis2, 3. Progressive fibrosis results in increased ventricular stiffness contributing to diastolic dysfunction and increased arrhythmogenesis4. Beneficial effects of Ang II inhibition have been reported widely in experimental animal studies5, 6 and clinical settings7, 8. Ang II-induced ventricular remodeling is a widely used animal model to study pathogenesis of heart failure, but its biological effects are diverse and widely modulated by many other factors.
Transforming growth factor (TGF)-β is a multi-functional peptide growth factor with a vital role in the regulation of cell proliferation, differentiation, inflammation, angiogenesis, and wound healing, as recently reviewed9, 10. Several lines of evidence support an essential role of excessive TGF-β in pathogenesis of maladaptive remodeling and heart failure11-15. TGF-β serves as a downstream pro-hypertrophic and pro-fibrotic growth factor induced by Ang II16, 17. TGF-β has been trialed as a therapeutic target for progressive ventricular remodeling14, 18-21, but the results were inconsistent20, 22, 23. Although excessive TGF-β is deleterious to stressed myocardium, baseline TGF-β is essential to preserve myocardial integrity and structure12. Complete elimination of this essential growth factor may not be altogether benign. TGF-β activation is regulated at multiple different sites including within intracellular signaling pathways and through extracellular interactions. In the extracellular milieu, several matricellular proteins have been known to modulate TGF-β activation and have been recently highlighted as major contributors of the pathogenesis of ventricular remodeling24, 25.
We recently reported that genetic deletion of fibulin-2, an ECM protein, attenuated ventricular dysfunction and significantly improved survival following experimental myocardial infarction (MI) in the mouse model26. The same fibulin-2 deficient mice failed to develop subpressor Ang II-induced myocardial hypertrophy in conjunction with suppressed TGF-β mRNA up-regulation and its downstream signaling, suggesting that fibulin-2 is necessary for Ang II-induced TGF-β signaling and myocardial hypertrophy27. Collectively, these studies suggest that fibulin-2 assumes a unique role in mediating TGF-β activation in the ECM to enhance myocardial remodeling. We also found that fibulin-2 appeared to mediate Ang II-induced myocardial fibrosis, but the underlying mechnism of how fibulin-2 facilitates fibrosis was not fully studied. Here, we introduce an experimenal model that induces myocardial fibrosis by chronic infusion of pressor dosage of Ang II that also causes systemic hypertension and investigate how fibulin-2 deficiency prevents development of myocardial fibrosis, an ominous pathological process that aggravates ventricular remodeling and heart failure.
Materials and Methods
2.1 Animals
Adult male mice, 12-20 wks old, were used in this study. The Fbln2KO mice were maintained on the C57BL/6 genetic background after backcrossing for 10 generations as described elsewhere28. Age-matched WT C57BL/6 mice were purchased from the Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). All animal procedures in this study were performed in adherence with the National Institutes of Health Guidelines on the Use of Laboratory Animals and have been approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of Nemours/Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children.
2.2 Chronic subcutaneous Ang II infusion
Under isoflurane anesthesia (1.5%), a mini-osmotic pump (ALZET, model 2004; ALZACorp, Palo Alto, CA) filled with either pressor dose of Ang II (2 μg/kg/min; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO)29 or normal saline was inserted underneath the skin. Body weight (BW), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and heart rate (HR) were measured before, 2 wks, and 4 wks after Ang II infusion. After 4 wk of Ang II infusion, all mice were euthanized with CO2 inhalation. The weight of the left ventricle was measured, and the ratio of left ventricular weight (LVW) to the body weight (BW) was calculated as an index of LV hypertrophy.
2.3 Echocardiography
Under isoflurane anesthesia (1.5%), M-mode echocardiography was performed before, 2 wks, and 4 wks after the initiation of Ang II infusion (Vevo770 System, VisualSonics, Toronto, Canada). Diastolic measurements of inter-ventricular septum (IVSd), LV internal dimension (LVIDd), LV posterior wall thickness (LVPWd), and systolic measurement of LV internal dimension (LVIDs) were obtained. The LV shortening fraction (%LVSF) was calculated as below:
2.4 Histopathology and immunohistochemistry
The LV myocardium was stored in 10% formalin/PBS or frozen medium (OCT) for routine histology (hematoxylin and eosin [H&E] and Masson's trichrome staining) or immunohistochemistry, respectively. Serial 8-μm-thick cryosections of frozen specimens were prepared for immunohistochemistry. The detailed protocol for immunostaining has been described elsewhere30. Primary antibody used was anti-fibulin-231. Alexa Fluor 546 goat anti-rabbit IgG antibody (Invitrogen Corporation, Carlsbad, CA) was used for secondary antibody. The specimens were observed under a light microscope or epifluorescent microscope (Olympus, Japan). The area of fibrosis in Masson's trichrome staining was measured by ImageJ and was represented as percentage of total myocardial area. Average myocyte cross-sectional area in H&E slides was also measured by ImageJ.
2.5 Quantitative real-time RT-PCR (qRT-PCR)
Total RNA was extracted from the LV myocardium using TRI Reagent (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The cDNA was synthesized from 2 μg of total RNA by oligo(dT)-primed reverse transcription s(RT) (iScript cDNA synthesis kit, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA). Real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was performed with MyiQ Single-Color Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad Laboratories). Collagen type I (Col I), collagen type III (Col III), fibulin-2, TGF-β1, atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), and β-myosin heavy chain (β-MHC) were studied. The expression for each gene was determined as the relative expression or cycle threshold (Ct) of the gene of interest to the expression of GAPDH by the following formula:
Primers for qRT-PCR are listed in online supplemental Table 1.
Table 1. Physiological parameters during pressor dosage of Ang II infusion (2 μg/kg/min) over 4 weeks.
Before (0 Wk) | 2 Wks | 4 Wks | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||
WT-Sh | WT-Ang II | KO-Sh | KO-Ang II | WT-Sh | WT-Ang II | KO-Sh | KO-Ang II | WT-Sh | WT-Ang II | KO-Sh | KO-Ang II | |
BW (g) | 30.4 ±2.2 | 30.3 ±1.2 | 28.7 ±3.1 | 30.9 ±2.4 | 29.5 ±2.3 | 28.5 ±1.0 | 29.0 ±3.1 | 28.4 ±2.7 | 29.7 ±2.2 | 28.4 ±1.2 | 28.9 ±3.0 | 27.7 ±2.1 |
HR (beats/min) | 633 ±82 | 558 ±94 | 605 ±113 | 590 ±132 | 662 ±95 | 559 ±70 | 687 ±42 | 588 ±69 | 661 ±55 | 580 ±58 | 652 ±87 | 642 ±83 |
SBP (mmHg) | 100 ±11 | 104 ±9 | 105 ± 13 | 107 ±8 | 112 ±8 | 158 ±19*† | 109 ±11 | 161 ±11*† | 120 ±10 | 170 ±12*† | 121 ±7 | 162 ±12*† |
p < 0.05 compared with sham.
p < 0.05 compared with 0 day.
2.6 Western blotting analysis
Myocardial tissue was homogenized with RIPA lysis buffer (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), and protein concentration of the supernatants was determined by Pierce BCA Assays (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL). Protein lysates (50 μg) were electrophoresed on a 14% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-polyacrylamide gel and then electrophoretically transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Millipore, Billerica, MA). Primary antibodies used were against phospho-Smad2, Smad2, phospho-ERK1/2, ERK1/2, phospho-p38MAPK, p38MAPK, β-Actin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), and fibulin-2. Blots were incubated with horseradish-labeled secondary antibodies (anti-mouse IgG or anti-rabbit IgG), and signals were detected using Pierce ECL Western Blotting Substrate (Pierce Biotechnology). Membrane was exposed to Fuji radiograph film, and signal intensities were analyzed with the ImageJ software.
2.7. Cell Culture
Cardiac fibroblasts (CFs) were isolated from ventricular myocardium of Fbln2KO after repeated digestion with collagenase IV (100U/ml)/trypsin (0.6mg/ml) (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) solution. The CFs were resuspended in DMEM with 20% FBS (Mediatech Inc., Herndon, VA) and 1% penicillin and streptomycin (Invitrogen) and were plated on laminin-coated 60-mm dishes (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ). After the first passage, CFs were transfected with fibulin-2 expression plasmid in Rc/CMV vector31 and empty Rc/CMV vector (control) by Nucleofactor Technology (Lonza, Walkersville, MD). In another experiment, recombinant fibulin-231 was plated on the laminin-coated plates at two different concentrations (0.5 and 2.5 μg/ml as a final concentration of culture medium) before CFs were seeded. Then, CFs were incubated in serum-free medium for 24 hours, followed by Ang II (1×10-7 M) treatment for 24 hours. The CFs were then harvested.
2. 8 Statistical analysis
All values in the text and figures are presented as mean ± SD unless specified otherwise. All data were subjected to one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferoni correction for post-hoc t-test. Western blot densities were analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn's post-hoc test. P values of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Results
3.1 Physiological Effects of Pressor dosage of Ang II infusion
All mice survived Ang II treatment for 4 wks. The BW, HR, and SBP were measured before treatment and 2 wks and 4 wks after Ang II infusion (Table 1). The BW did not change in either WT or Fbln2KO over 4 wks. Ang II-induced hypertension (40 to 50 mmHg increase compared with sham) was noted in both WT and Fbln2KO at 2 wks and 4 wks, but there was no significant difference between WT and Fbln2KO. The HR did not change significantly among the four groups. Echocardiogram revealed that the increase in LV wall thickness after Ang II treatment was comparable between WT and Fbln2KO, but there was no change in LV cavity size (LVIDd) and/or LV systolic function (%LVFS) by Ang II treatment in either group (Figure 1A). The LVW/BW ratio increase by Ang II treatment was 32.5% in WT and 34.5% in Fbln2KO mice when compared with sham mice, respectively, consistent with the echocardiographic findings (Figure 1B). Pressor dosage of Ang II infusion resulted in the same degree of LV hypertrophy in both WT and Fbln2 KO without change in systolic function or ventricular chamber size. Fibulin-2 deletion did not attenuate the degree of Ang II-induced myocardial hypertrophy.
Figure 1.
A: Echocardiographic parameters at 0W and 4W after pressor dosage of Ang II infusion Significant but comparable increase in IVS and LV wall thickness was seen in both WT and KO (Fbln2KO). There was no signficant change in LV chamber size (LVIDd) or LV systolic function (%LVSF) after Ang II treatment in either group (n = 10 in all four groups). * p < 0.05 compared with sham. IVSd: Interventricular septum in diastole, LVPWd: Left ventricular posterior wall thickness in diastole, LVIDd: Left ventricular internal diameter in diastole, and %LVSF: % Left ventricular shortening fraction. B: LVW (left ventricular weight) /BW (body weight) ratio. There was significant but comparable increase of LVW/BW in the Ang II-treated groups, both WT and Fbln2KO, when compared with sham groups. Data are shown as mean ± SD.
3.2 Developemnt of Myocardial Fibrosis was Markedly Reduced in Fbln2KO Mice
The degree of myocardial fibrosis was assessed by Masson's Trichrome staining (Figure 2A). In WT with Ang II treatment, there was significant increase in fibrosis (blue color) in both perivascular and interstitial area in WT, whereas the degree of fibrosis did not increase by Ang II in Fbln2KO mice. Quantitative assessment of fibrotic area showed that Ang II-treated WT showed significantly increased fibrosis compared with the rest of the groups (Figure 2C). With Ang II treatment, spatial expression of fibulin-2 protein was increased in the interstitial area in WT when compared with sham; there was no fibulin-2 expression in Fbln2KO mice. Signficant increase in mRNA levels of collagen type I (Col I) and collagen type III (Col III) by Ang II was seen in WT, whereas there was no significant increase by Ang II in Fbln2KO mice (Figure 3). These results indicated that the development of Ang II-induced myocardial fibrosis was significantly attenuated by the absence of fibulin-2. Myocyte cross-sectional area was equally increased by Ang II treatment in both WT and Fbln2KO, consistent with LVW/BW (Figure 1B). However, β-MHC showed no change by Ang II in either group. Although Ang II-induced myocardial hypertrophy was comparable between WT and Fbln2KO, ANP and BNP mRNA were both significantly higher in Fbln2KO than WT.
Figure 2. Development of myocardial fibrosis (A) and hypertrophy (B) after Ang II infusion.
A: Masson's trichrome staining (left 4) and fibulin-2 localization by immunohistochemistry (right 4). WT developed significant perivascular and insterstitial fibrosis by Ang II infusion, whereas Ang II-induced fibrosis was almost completely abolished in KO (Fbln2KO). Fibulin-2 protein expression was significantly increased after Ang II infusion in WT (dissuse interstitial localization: arrows). Magnification bar = 100 μm. B: High magnification of left ventricular myocardium by hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) staining. Magnification bar = 100 μm. C: Quantification of myocardial fibrosis by meauring fibrotic area (blue color after Masson's Trichrome staining) using Image J software. Y axis indicates % area of fibrosis. Ang II-treated WT showed significant myocardial fibrosis compared with WT sham or Ang II-treated KO. Sample size: WT-sham (n = 3), WT-Ang II (n = 5), KO-sham (n = 3), and KO-Ang II (n = 5). D: Myocyte cross-sectional area was measured by ImageJ. Average area of WT sham was arbitarily set at 1. Sample size: n = 4 in all groups. Data are shown as mean ± SD.
Figure 3. Myocardial mRNA expression of selective remodeling genes by real-time RT-PCR (qRT-PCR).
Col I (collagen type I), Col III (collagen type III), fibulin-2, TGF-β1, ANP, BNP, and β-MHC were studied. Col I, Col III, and TGF-β1were significantly increased by Ang II in WT but not as significantly in Fbln2KO. Ang II-induced TGF-β1 increase was abolished in Fbln2KO. On the contrary, the Ang II-induced increase in ANP and BNP was significantly higher in Fbln2KO when compared with WT. There was no significant change in β-MHC after Ang II treatment in either WT or KO. Data are shown as mean ± SD. *p < 0.05 compared with sham (Sh). #p < 0.05 compared with WT. Sample size: n = 10 in all four groups.
3.3 The Activation of Ang II-induced TGF-β Signaling Pathway was also Attenuated in Fbln2KO Mice
Ang II treatment significantly increased TGF-β1 mRNA levels in WT but not in Fbln2KO, suggesting fibulin-2 is required for Ang II-induced TGF-β1 mRNA up-regulation. Phosphorylation of Smad2, a downstream maker of TGF-β downstream canonical pathway, was significantly increased in WT by Ang II treatment, but there was no change in Fbln2KO (Figure 4). Protein expression of fibulin-2 was increased in WT by Ang II, which is consistent with the finding of immunohistochemistry (Figure 2) and qRT-PCR (Figure 3). There was no significant changes in phosphorylation in p38MAPK, JNK, or TAK1, markers for noncanonical pathways, by Ang II in either WT or Fbln2KO (data not shown). The study suggests that fibulin-2 is required for Ang II-induced TGF-β1 mRNA up-regulation and its downstream Smad signaling.
Figure 4. Protein expression by Western blots.
A: Fibulin-2 protein expression and Smad2 phosphorylation were significantly increased with Ang II treatment in WT, whereas there was no significant change in these protein expressions in Fbln2 KO hearts. B: Quantification of protein expression. Sample size: n = 4 in all groups.
3.4 Addition of Exogenous Fibulin-2 to Fbln2KO CFs Rescued Ang II-induced TGF-β Signaling
We have previously shown that fibulin-2 is required for Ang II-induced TGF-β up-regulation and ECM protein up-regulation in isolated CFs26, 32. In this study, fibulin-2 deficient CFs were rescued by either transfecting fibulin-2 expression vector or adding recombinant mouse fibulin-2 to the culture plates before treating with Ang II. By transfecting fibulin-2 expression vector, fibulin-2 protein was synthesized by Fbln2 KO CFs. Ang II treatment increased phosphorylated Smad2 (Figure 5A). By adding recombinant fibulin-2 in Fbln2KO cells, Ang II treatment increased TGF-β downstream noncanonical signaling markers ERK1/2 and p38MAPK but did not up-regulate Smad2 (Figure 5B). However, Smad2 phosphorylation was increased just by adding recombinant fibulin-2. These findings suggest that fibulin-2 is, in part, sufficient for Ang II-induced TGF-β signaling responsible for ECM remodeling.
Figure 5. The effects of introducing exogenous fibulin-2 in Fbln2KO cardiac fibroblats (CFs) for Ang II treatment.
A: Either Rc/CMV vector or fibulin-2 expression vector was transfected in CFs before Ang II treatment. Western blots showing fibulin-2 expression and Smad2 phophorylation. Fibulin-2 transfection successfully introduced fibulin-2 on Fbln2KO CFs, in which Ang II slightly increased Smad2 phorphorylation. B: Recombinant mouse fibulin-2 was added to Fbln2KO CFs in two different concentrations; 0.5 and 2.5 μg/ml. Smad2 phosphorylation was increased only by adding recombinant fibulin-2. Both ERK1/2 and p38MAPK showed increased phosphorylation after adding both recombinant fibulin-2 and Ang II. Quantification of protein expression were shown in the graphs for both A and B.
Discussion
Our current study demonstrated that the absence of fibulin-2 attenuated Ang II-induced myocardial fibrosis but not myocardial hypertrophy. Fibulin-2 was not required for Ang II-induced systemic hypertension. In this model, the mouse LV myocardium was exposed to both direct pharmacological effects of Ang II and the pressure overload (40 to 50 mmHg) secondary to hypertension. With this sequence of experiments, we have demonstrated that fibulin-2 is essential for upregulation of TGF-β mRNA and subsequent signaling in developing myocardial fibrosis.
4.1 Fibulin-2 Deficiency did not Prevent Hypertension or Hypertrophy but Attenuated Myocardial Fibrosis
In the current study, we focused on induction of myocardial fibrosis by infusing high-dose Ang II (2 μg/kg/min) for 4 weeks, which is a 10-fold higher dosage than the dose of subpressor used in the previous study27. High-dose Ang II infusion is reported to induce hypertension via direct vasoconstriction and resulting LV hypertrophy and myocardial fibrosis in WT mice29. In our study, the degree of hypertension and myocardial hypertrophy were comparable between WT and Fbln2KO, but myocardial fibrosis was seen only in WT and was almost abolished in Fbln2KO mice (Figure 2). There was no LV dilatation or LV systolic dysfunction in either group after high-dose Ang II infusion, as demonstrated by echoardiography (Figure 1). The attenuated myocardial fibrosis in Fbln2KO by Ang II is associated with lack of up-regulation of TGF-β1 mRNA and its downstream signal, phosphorylated Smad2. Decreased up-regulation of Col I and Col III mRNA expression in Fbln2KO may be attributed to lack of TGF-β activation. Smad-dependent pathways are a central pathway for TGF-β-induced myocardial fibrosis33. Our results were similar to other experiments with Smad3KO mice in response to Ang II infusion34.
In our current model, a comparable degree of myocardial hypertrophy was induced in Fbln2KO without TGF-β activation, suggesting that pressure overload and other Ang II-induced TGF-β- independent pathways may be responsible for hypertrophy in both groups, such as interleukin-6 (IL-6) and nitric oxide (NO)35. Enhanced TGF-β signaling plays a principal role in inducing myocardial fibrosis. This is in agreement with the previous studies in which TGF-β inhibition by TGF-β neutralizing antibody resulted in attenuation of myocardial fibrosis but no significant change in myocrdial hypertrophy in a pressure overload model15, 36. Absence of fibulin-2 did not allow Ang II-induced TGF-β1 up-regulation, suggesting Ang II cannot directly induce TGF-β mRNA expression without fibulin-2. Of note, Smad2 activation was increased only by adding recombinant fibulin-2 to isolated Fbln2KO CFs, suggesting extracellular interaction between fibulin-2 and latent TGF-β complex (Figure 5B). Fibulin-2 appears to mediate TGF-β-induced TGF-β synthesis/activation or TGF-β autoinduction.
Interestingly, we found that up-regulation of ANP and BNP mRNA was significantly higher in Fbln2KO than in WT by Ang II despite a similar degree of hypertrophy between WT and Fbln2KO. Although natriuretic peptides are up-regulated in pressure overload-induced hypertrophy (transverse arch constriction or TAC model), they are also known to counteract against TGF-β in its pro-fibrotic properties37. The synthesis of natriuretic peptides is induced not only by mechanical stretch but also directly by Ang II38. The up-regulation of natriuretic peptides may counteract the progression of fibrosis in in Flbn2KO. The mechanism of prominent up-regulation of natriuretic pepides in Fbln2KO remains elusive in this study, but a similar finding was reported in osteopotin-deficient mice in which Ang II-induced myocardial fibrosis was attenutated29. As stated above, the role of natriuretic peptides in our model may be different from that in TAC-induced ventricular remodeling model, in which ANP and BNP up-regulation primarily represents the degree of hypertrophy.
4.2 Fibulin-2 is Required and Sufficient for Ang II-induced TGF-β Activation
Adding exogenous fibulin-2 in Fbln2KO CFs by transfecting fibulin-2 expression vector or by adding recombinant fibulin-2 protein rescued, in part, Ang II-induced TGF-β signaling in Fbln2KO CFs, suggesting fibulin-2 is also sufficient for Ang II-induced TGF-β activation, as shown as increased phosphorylation in Smad2 (Figure 5A) and in ERK1/2 and p38MAPK (Figure 5B). With the subpressor Ang II infusioin model, we demonstrated the fibulin-2-mediated autocrine and paracrine positive-feedback loop involving TGF-β as a central mechanism of Ang II-induced myocardial hypertrophy27. In our current model, myocardial hypertrophy was induced equally in both WT and Fbln2KO regardless of myocardial TGF-β activation, but fibrosis was almost abolished in Fbln2KO in conjunction with suppressed TGF-β activation. Fibulin-2 played a pivotal role in activating TGF-β and subsequently introducing myocardial fibrosis. Separately, Karakikes et al. identified fibulin-2 as a direct downstream marker in miRNA treatment (miR-1) that prevented pressure overload-induced pathological remodeling in conjunction with attenuated TGF-β signaling39. Fibulin-2 was up-regulated in the left ventricular myocardium of endstage heart failure patients in conjunction with significantly enhanced TGF-β bioactivity when compared with control myocardium, suggesting a pathological role of fibulin-2 in exacerbating adverse ventricular remodeling also in humans40. These findings, together with our current results, strongly suggest that fibulin-2 plays a critical role in pathological remodeling that can become a potential target for attenuating heart failure.
4.3 Fibulin-2 is a Unique Matricellular Protein in Modulating ECM during Ventricular Remodeling
We have proposed that fibulin-2 is a new member of matricellular protein that does not participate in structural integrity of a tissue but is mainly involved in regulating activation of enzymes, proteinases, and growth factors25. Spatially, fibulin-2 is highly up-regulated at the sites of epithelial-mesenchymal transformation during embyonic development, but its expression is restricted to the vascular endothelial basement membrane, cardiac valves, skin basal layers, and periostial membrane30, 41. Fibulin-2 is up-regulated in the tissue repair process in skin wound healing42 and myocardial infarction (MI)26. Loss of fibulin-2 protected against cardiac rupture and ventricular dysfunction, and significantly improved survival after MI by attenuating TGF-β signaling26. Both MMP-2 mRNA and activation levels were markedly reduced in Fbln2KO when compared with WT during ventricular remodeling after MI26.
The underlying molecular mechamism of how fibulin-2 regulates TGF-β synthesis remains elusive, but it is important to note that Ang II cannot induce TGF-β up-regulation without fibulin-2, suggesting that Ang II does not directly induce TGF-β expression without ECM involvement. Ang II initially up-regulates fibulin-2, which subsequently activates TGF-β probably by cleaving free TGF-β from the latent complex in ECM. Isolated free TGF-β induces TGF-β synthesis in an autocrine manner, which promotes a positive-feedback loop (autoinduction) (Figure 6). We speculate that secreted fibulin-2 first enhances TGF-β activation by interacting with inactive latent complex in the ECM and that released free TGF-β can induce autoinduction by autocrine and/or paracrine means.
Figure 6. Possible underlying mechanism of how fibulin-2 is involved in TGF-β autoinduction (TGF-β-induced TGF-β synthesis and activation), myocardial hypertrophy, and fibrosis in response to pressor dosage of Ang II.
Myocardial hypertrophy was induced predominantly via hypertension-induced shear stress and Ang II receptor type 1 (ATR1)-mediated signaling pathways independent of TGF-β, as presence or absence of fibulin-2 did not alter hypertrophy in this model. Increased fibulin-2 protein expression may enhance TGF-β activation through extracellular interaction that triggers TGF-β autoinduction in WT leading fibrosis, whereas absence of fibulin-2 cannot initiate TGF-β autoinduction. IL-6: interleukin-6, NO: nitric oxide.
Limitations
Ang II is known to induce myocardial fibrosis through increased inflammatory process, which is also mediated by TGF-β34. We have not investigated the involvement of inflammatory cells and their cytokines in this study. In our previous post-MI study, the number of macrophages and neutrophils in the ischemic myocardium were significantly reduced in Fbln2KO mice when compared with WT three days after MI26. We have not examined LV diastolic function, which is an excellent functional marker of myocardial fibrosis and/or hypertrophy. To claim that this is an animal model of pathological myocardial fibrosis, it is critical to assess diastolic function. However, echocardiographic assessment of LV diastolic dysfunction in the mouse model remains controversial.
Conclusion
Our current study suggests that fibulin-2 is essential for Ang II-induced myocardial fibrosis by mediating TGF-β signaling. Without fibulin-2, TGF-β autoinduction does not occur. Targeting fibulin-2 may have potential therapeutic indication not only by preventing TGF-β-mediated myocardial fibrosis, thus attenuating the progression of heart failure in humans, but also by enhancing expression of natriuretic peptides that have antifibrotic properties43. Further investigation is required to delineate the underlying molecular mechanisms that involve fibulin-2.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by U. S. National Institute of Health (1P20RR020173-01 to TT).
Grant Support: National Institute of Health (1P20RR020173-01)
Abbreviations
- Ang II
Angiotensin II
- ANP
Atrial natriuretic peptide
- BNP
Brain nariuretic peptide
- β-MHC
β-myosin heavy chain
- BW
Body weight
- ECM
Extracellular matrix
- ERK
Extracellular signal-regulated kinases
- Fbln2 KO
Fibulin-2 knockout
- HR
Heart rate
- MAPK
Mitogen-activated protein kinases
- MI
Myocardial infarction
- RAAS
Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system
- SBP
Systolic blood pressure
- Smad
Sma and Mad (Mothers against decapentaplegic)
- TAC
Transverse arch constriction
- TGF-β
Transforming growth factor-β
Footnotes
Conflict of Interest: None.
References
- 1.Higuchi S, Ohtsu H, Suzuki H, et al. Angiotensin II signal transduction through the AT1 receptor: novel insights into mechanisms and pathophysiology. Clin Sci (Lond) 2007;112(8):417–428. doi: 10.1042/CS20060342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Weber KT. Extracellular matrix remodeling in heart failure: a role for de novo angiotensin II generation. Circulation. 1997;96(11):4065–4082. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.96.11.4065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Pfeffer JM, Fischer TA, Pfeffer MA. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction. Annu Rev Physiol. 1995;57:805–826. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ph.57.030195.004105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Swynghedauw B. Molecular mechanisms of myocardial remodeling. Physiol Rev. 1999;79(1):215–262. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1999.79.1.215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Harada K, Sugaya T, Murakami K, et al. Angiotensin II type 1A receptor knockout mice display less left ventricular remodeling and improved survival after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1999;100(20):2093–2099. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.100.20.2093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Jain M, Liao R, Ngoy S, et al. Angiotensin II receptor blockade attenuates the deleterious effects of exercise training on post-MI ventricular remodelling in rats. Cardiovasc Res. 2000;46(1):66–72. doi: 10.1016/s0008-6363(99)00429-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Pfeffer MA, Braunwald E, Moye LA, et al. Effect of captopril on mortality and morbidity in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction. Results of the survival and ventricular enlargement trial. The SAVE Investigators N Engl J Med. 1992;327(10):669–677. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199209033271001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Schieffer B, Wirger A, Meybrunn M, et al. Comparative effects of chronic angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockade on cardiac remodeling after myocardial infarction in the rat. Circulation. 1994;89(5):2273–2282. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.89.5.2273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Verrecchia F, Mauviel A. Control of connective tissue gene expression by TGF beta: role of Smad proteins in fibrosis. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2002;4(2):143–149. doi: 10.1007/s11926-002-0010-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Leask A, Abraham DJ. TGF-beta signaling and the fibrotic response. FASEB J. 2004;18(7):816–827. doi: 10.1096/fj.03-1273rev. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lim HZY. Role of transforming growth factor-beta in the progression of heart failure. Cell Mole Life Sci. 2006;63:2584–2596. doi: 10.1007/s00018-006-6085-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Dobaczewski M, Chen W, Frangogiannis NG. Transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta signaling in cardiac remodeling. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2011;51(4):600–606. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2010.10.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wang J, Xu N, Feng X, et al. Targeted disruption of Smad4 in cardiomyocytes results in cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure. Circ Res. 2005;97(8):821–828. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000185833.42544.06. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Okada H, Takemura G, Kosai K, et al. Postinfarction gene therapy against transforming growth factor-beta signal modulates infarct tissue dynamics and attenuates left ventricular remodeling and heart failure. Circulation. 2005;111(19):2430–2437. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000165066.71481.8E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kuwahara F, Kai H, Tokuda K, et al. Transforming growth factor-beta function blocking prevents myocardial fibrosis and diastolic dysfunction in pressure-overloaded rats. Circulation. 2002;106(1):130–135. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000020689.12472.e0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gray MO, Long CS, Kalinyak JE, et al. Angiotensin II stimulates cardiac myocyte hypertrophy via paracrine release of TGF-beta 1 and endothelin-1 from fibroblasts. Cardiovasc Res. 1998;40(2):352–363. doi: 10.1016/s0008-6363(98)00121-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Rosenkranz S. TGF-beta1 and angiotensin networking in cardiac remodeling. Cardiovasc Res. 2004;63(3):423–432. doi: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2004.04.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Chen LL, Yin H, Huang J. Inhibition of TGF-beta1 signaling by eNOS gene transfer improves ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction through angiogenesis and reduction of apoptosis. Cardiovascular pathology : the official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Pathology. 2007;16(4):221–230. doi: 10.1016/j.carpath.2007.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ellmers LJ, Scott NJ, Medicherla S, et al. Transforming growth factor-beta blockade down-regulates the renin-angiotensin system and modifies cardiac remodeling after myocardial infarction. Endocrinology. 2008;149(11):5828–5834. doi: 10.1210/en.2008-0165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ikeuchi M, Tsutsui H, Shiomi T, et al. Inhibition of TGF-beta signaling exacerbates early cardiac dysfunction but prevents late remodeling after infarction. Cardiovasc Res. 2004;64(3):526–535. doi: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2004.07.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Tan SM, Zhang Y, Connelly KA, et al. Targeted inhibition of activin receptor-like kinase 5 signaling attenuates cardiac dysfunction following myocardial infarction. American journal of physiology Heart and circulatory physiology. 2010;298(5):H1415–1425. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.01048.2009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Frantz S, Hu K, Adamek A, et al. Transforming growth factor beta inhibition increases mortality and left ventricular dilatation after myocardial infarction. Basic Res Cardiol. 2008;103(5):485–492. doi: 10.1007/s00395-008-0739-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lucas JA, Zhang Y, Li P, et al. Inhibition of transforming growth factor-beta signaling induces left ventricular dilation and dysfunction in the pressure-overloaded heart. American journal of physiology Heart and circulatory physiology. 2010;298(2):H424–432. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00529.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Schellings MW, Pinto YM, Heymans S. Matricellular proteins in the heart: possible role during stress and remodeling. Cardiovasc Res. 2004;64(1):24–31. doi: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2004.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Frangogiannis NG. Matricellular proteins in cardiac adaptation and disease. Physiol Rev. 2012;92(2):635–688. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00008.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Tsuda T, Wu J, Gao E, et al. Loss of fibulin-2 protects against progressive ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2012;52(1):273–282. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2011.11.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Zhang H, Wu J, Dong H, et al. Fibulin-2 deficiency attenuates angiotensin II-induced cardiac hypertrophy by reducing transforming growth factor-beta signalling. Clin Sci (Lond) 2014;126(4):275–288. doi: 10.1042/CS20120636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Sicot FX, Tsuda T, Markova D, et al. Fibulin-2 is dispensable for mouse development and elastic fiber formation. Mol Cell Biol. 2008;28(3):1061–1067. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01876-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Matsui Y, Jia N, Okamoto H, et al. Role of osteopontin in cardiac fibrosis and remodeling in angiotensin II-induced cardiac hypertrophy. Hypertension. 2004;43(6):1195–1201. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000128621.68160.dd. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Tsuda T, Wang H, Timpl R, et al. Fibulin-2 expression marks transformed mesenchymal cells in developing cardiac valves, aortic arch vessels, and coronary vessels. Dev Dyn. 2001;222(1):89–100. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.1172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Pan T-CST, Zhang RZ, Fassler R, Timpl R, Chu M-L. Structures and expression of fibulin-2, a novel extracellular matrix protein with multiple EGF-like repeats and concensus motif for calcium binding. J Cell Biol. 1993;123:1269–1277. doi: 10.1083/jcb.123.5.1269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Huntgeburth M, Tiemann K, Shahverdyan R, et al. Transforming growth factor beta(1) oppositely regulates the hypertrophic and contractile response to beta-adrenergic stimulation in the heart. PloS one. 2011;6(11):e26628. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Koitabashi N, Danner T, Zaiman AL, et al. Pivotal role of cardiomyocyte TGF-beta signaling in the murine pathological response to sustained pressure overload. J Clin Invest. 2011;121(26):2301–2312. doi: 10.1172/JCI44824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Huang XR, Chung AC, Yang F, et al. Smad3 mediates cardiac inflammation and fibrosis in angiotensin II-induced hypertensive cardiac remodeling. Hypertension. 2010;55(5):1165–1171. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.147611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Schluter KD, Wenzel S. Angiotensin II: a hormone involved in and contributing to pro-hypertrophic cardiac networks and target of anti-hypertrophic cross-talks. Pharmacol Ther. 2008;119(3):311–325. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2008.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Koitabashi N, Arai M, Niwano K, et al. Plasma connective tissue growth factor is a novel potential biomarker of cardiac dysfunction in patients with chronic heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2008;10(4):373–379. doi: 10.1016/j.ejheart.2008.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Molkentin JD. A friend within the heart: natriuretic peptide receptor signaling. J Clin Invest. 2003;111(9):1275–1277. doi: 10.1172/JCI18389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Majalahti T, Suo-Palosaari M, Sarman B, et al. Cardiac BNP gene activation by angiotensin II in vivo. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2007;273(1-2):59–67. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2007.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Karakikes I, Chaanine AH, Kang S, et al. Therapeutic cardiac-targeted delivery of miR-1 reverses pressure overload-induced cardiac hypertrophy and attenuates pathological remodeling. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2013;2(2):e000078. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.113.000078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Khan S, Joyce J, Margulies KB, et al. Enhanced Bioactive Myocardial Transforming Growth Factor-beta in Advanced Human Heart Failure. Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society. 2014;78(11):2711–2718. doi: 10.1253/circj.cj-14-0511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Kobayashi N, Kostka G, Garbe JH, et al. A comparative analysis of the fibulin protein family. Biochemical characterization, binding interactions, and tissue localization J Biol Chem. 2007;282(16):11805–11816. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M611029200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Fassler R, Sasaki T, Timpl R, et al. Differential regulation of fibulin, tenascin-C, and nidogen expression during wound healing of normal and glucocorticoid-treated mice. Exp Cell Res. 1996;222(1):111–116. doi: 10.1006/excr.1996.0014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Li P, Wang D, Lucas J, et al. Atrial natriuretic peptide inhibits transforming growth factor beta-induced Smad signaling and myofibroblast transformation in mouse cardiac fibroblasts. Circ Res. 2008;102(2):185–192. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.107.157677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.