Skip to main content
Indian Journal of Microbiology logoLink to Indian Journal of Microbiology
. 2016 Apr 18;56(3):318–327. doi: 10.1007/s12088-016-0581-9

Antagonistic and Biocontrol Potential of Trichoderma asperellum ZJSX5003 Against the Maize Stalk Rot Pathogen Fusarium graminearum

Yaqian Li 1,2,3, Ruiyan Sun 1,2,3, Jia Yu 1,2,3, Kandasamy Saravanakumar 1,2,3, Jie Chen 1,2,3,
PMCID: PMC4920761  PMID: 27407296

Abstract

The efficacy of seven strains of Trichodermaasperellum collected from the fields in Southern China was assessed against Fusarium graminearum (FG) the causal agent of corn stalk rot of maize were in vitro for their antagonistic properties followed by statistical model of principal compound analysis to identify the beneficial antagonist T.asperellum strain. The key factors of antagonist activity were attributed to a total of 13 factors including cell wall degrading enzymes (chitnase, protease and β-glucanases), secondary metabolites and peptaibols and these were analyzed from eight strains of Trichoderma. A linear regression model demonstrated that interaction of enzymes and secondary metabolites of T. asperellum strain ZJSX5003 enhanced the antagonist activity against FG. Further, this strain displayed a disease reduction of 71 % in maize plants inoculated with FG compared to negative control. Pointing out that the T. asperellum strain ZJSX5003 is a potential source for the development of a biocontrol agent against corn stalk rot.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s12088-016-0581-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Keywords: Cell wall-degrading enzymes, Corn stalk rot, Fusariumgraminearum, Principal component analysis, Trichoderma asperellum

Introduction

Maize is one of the important food crops worldwide. However, growing this crop finds difficulty due to its susceptibility to plant diseases caused by phytopathogens. Corn stalk rot (CSR) caused by the soil borne fungus Fusariumgraminearum Schwabe (FG) (Teleomorph, Giberella zeal (Schwein) Petch is one of most serious issues worldwide, causing severe losses of maize production. The occurrence of CSR has been reported in 23 countries, including the United States, Canada, India, and France [1]. Use of the most chemical fungicides as seed coatings could not effectively control CSR due to the natural degradation of chemicals and non beneficial Fusarium sp., which can infect the maize at any growing stage and season.

Use of fungicides potentially increases the consequence of toxicity of environmental concern and little effect on biological control. Therefore, the use of biocontrol agents (BCAs) capable of colonising in the rhizosphere could constitute a potential disease management strategy for maize cultivation [2]. Therefore, farmers are interested to use the highly virulent microbial fungicides as BCAs against CSR. Trichoderma spp., are a well known BCAs group that control the pathogens through competition, antibiosis, mycoparasitism, besides inducing the plant defence responses and triggering plant growth by prodcuing growth hormones, antibiosis compounds and cell wall degrading enzymes which act synergistically against the fungal pathogens [25]. In addition, some Trichoderma (Teleomorph, Hypocrea) strains can colonize corn roots during the juvenile phase and induce broad spectrum systemic resistance responses (ISR) in leaves during later periods of plant growth [6].

Mycoparasitism involves direct antagonism against soil-borne pathogens through enzymatic lysis by secretion of cell wall degrading enzymes (CWDEs) such as chitinases, glucanases, and proteases [7]. Reportedly Trichoderma can produce the diverse range of secondary metabolites, CWDEs and peptaibols which enhance antagonism against fungal pathogens [8]. Production of peptaibols, a class of non-ribosomally synthesised linear peptides with antimicrobial properties by Trichoderma virens (Miller, Giddens and Foster) Arx and cloning of the gene responsible for its production has been established [9]. Numbers of studies dedicated to biological control of plant pathogens by Trichoderma, [10] have identified the production of secondary metabolites such as T22-azaphilone, harzianolide and T39 butenolide inhibitory to the R. solani (Teleomorph: Thanatephorus spp.), P. ultimum and G. graminis var. tritici.. Trichoderma harzianum Rafai T22 colonising roots of maize seedlings. These metabolites may induce the expression of resistance-response genes, such as chitinase, β-1,3-glucanase and protease and are repressive to the effect on Pythium ultimum infecting the maize [2].

The search of novel Trichoderma strains with high biocontrol potential for plant disease management is required for the ubiquitous occurrence of Trichoderma. It is highly necessary to screen the candidate Trichoderma strains for potential control of CSR in corn seedlings. Therefore, the present study aimed at screening the potent Trichoderma strain against FG by in vitro, in planta greenhouse assays followed by confirming the antagonistic virulence through the study of enzymes and secondary metabolites from the potent Trichoderma strain.

Materials and Methods

Fungi Strains, Medium, and Culture Conditions

A total of seven different Trichoderma asperellum (Samuels, Liechfeldt et Nirenberg) strains collected from the fields in Southern China were selected for the present study based on antagonistic study [11] (Supplementary Table 1). Trichoderma harzianum SH2303 (CGMCC No. 4963) which has been characterized as potent BCAs [12] was used as a positive control in antagonist and greenhouse experiments for comparison. A virulent plant pathogen F. graminearum Schwabe (CGMCC No. 304598) originated from diseased maize was used for antagonistic experiments. The Trichoderma strains were maintained in potato dextrose agar (PDA) and stored as glycerol stocks at −80 °C for genetic stability and viability. For the experimental purpose, agar plugs of Trichoderma strains were inoculated in the PDA agar plates, and incubated at 28 °C with 60 % humidity and continuous light for 5 days.

In Vitro Antagonist Assay

The in vitro antagonist activity against F. graminearum (FG) was determined using the dual culture technique [13]. Mycelial discs of 5 mm diameter removed from the growing edge of one week old Trichoderma and one week old FG culture were placed on the opposite sides of Petri dishs (90 × 15 mm) containing potato-dextrose agar at equal distance. A complete randomized experimental design was used with four Petri dishes for each antagonist. In control plates (without Trichoderma), a sterile agar disc was placed in place of the pathogen. The plates were incubated at 28 ± 2 °C for 5 days in the dark and at the end of the incubation period, the diameter of mycelia growth was measured and used to determine percentage of inhibition by using the formula

I=C-T/C×100.

where I percent inhibition; C radial growth of pathogen (mm) alone (control); T radial growth of pathogen (mm) in the presence of Trichoderma strains.

Determination of Cell Wall-Degrading Enzyme Activity

The cell wall-degrading enzymes (CWDEs) such as chitinase, β-1,3-glucanase, and protease were determined from culture filtrate of different T. asperellum strains. In brief, the Trichoderma strain was cultured in liquid production medium consisted of peptone (0.1 %), Urea (0.03 %), KH2PO4 (0.2 %), (NH4)2 SO4 (0.14 %), MgSO4·7H2O (0.03 %), CaCl2·6H2O (0.03), and 1 ml of trace element solution (Fe2+, Mn2+, Zn2+, and Co2+), pH (5.5), for 72 h at 180 RPM. After the incubation, the culture filtrates were centrifuged at 3000 RPM for 10 min and the supernatants were collected and used for enzyme assay. 0.05 % of substrate such 1.0 % of colloidal chitin [15] or cellulase carboxymethyl cellulose or gelatin, or pachyman to detect the enzymes chitinase [14] or cellulase or protease [17] or β (1–3) glucanase [16] respectively were dissolved in 50 mM of sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0). One unit of the enzyme activity is defined as the required amount of enzymes to catalyse µg of reducing sugar per ml per minute under the respective reaction condition. All the measurements were performed in triplicates.

Extraction and Purification of Peptaibols

For peptaibol profiling, each strain was grown in a 250 ml flask dispensed with 50 ml of a mineral medium containing (g l−1) glucose (5.0), KH2PO4 (0.8), KNO3 (0.7), Ca(H2PO4) (20.2), MgSO4·7H2O (0.5), MnSO4·5H2O (0.01), CuSO4·5H2O (0.005), FeSO4·7H2O (0.001) at 28 °C for 20 days. The extraction culture fluid was extracted twice with a mixture of butanol (3:1). The extracts were combined and centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 15 min. The supernatant was fully evaporated under vacuum. The residue was dissolved in 80 ml of methanol and dichloromethane (1:1) mixture and then filtered with 0.45 μm of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) membrane. The resulting extract was further evaporated in 5 ml of an 85:15 mixture of dichloromethane and methanol. The samples were transferred to a silica gel column (300 mm × 25 mm, 60 A, 35–75 mm). The column was washed to discard the acetone by using MeOH–H2O (85:15). Finally, the effluent was collected and evaporated to dryness under vacuum. The residue containing the peptides was dissolved in 2 ml of MeOH–H2O (85:15), transferred to a 1.5 ml centrifuge tube, and again evaporated to dryness vacuum for 10 min. The final residue of peptides was quantified and dissolved in 5 ml of MeOH–H2O (85:15) for the further analysis.

UPLC-QTOF-MS/MS Analysis of Trichoderma Peptaibols

Aliquots of peptaibols (1 μg of peptaibols /2 ml of MeOH) were analyzed using UPLC-QTOF-MS/MS (UMS, ACQUITYTM UPLC & Q-TOF MS Premier). The MS analysis was performed using a turbo data-dependent scan under the same conditions as used for negative-mode MS scanning. Total current ion mass spectra (full-scan mode) were measured between 200 and 2000 m/z. The mixture used for automatic mass calibration was 200 ng mL−1 of leucine enkephalin (556.3 m/z). The resulting 3-D matrix containing arbitrarily assigned peak index (retention time-m/z pairs), sample names (observations), and normalized peak area were exported to SIMCA-P software 11.0 (Umetrics, Umea, Sweden) for multivariate statistical analysis [1820].

Extraction and Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC–MS) Analysis of Secondary Metabolites

Secondary metabolites were extracted from culture filtrates of Trichoderma as previously described [10]. The selected Trichoderma (spore suspension 4.7 × 103 CFU/ml) was cultured in one liter of a mineral medium containing (g l−1 of 50 % seawater) peptone (10), glucose (5), MgSO4, NH4NO2 (2.4), yeasts extracts (5), ZnSO4 (0.2), FeSO4 (0.2) at pH 7.2 and incubated at 28 °C with shaking at 180 rpm for 31 days. After the incubation, 250 ml of dichloromethane was incorporated in the culture for overnight, and then impurities were removed by filtration (Whatman No.4) Further the supernatant was collected and stored at 2 °C for 24 h, and then the solvent and water were separated by using a separating funnel. The dichloromethane phase washed with the distilled water for two times and then concentrated by a using rotary evaporator. The concentrated residue of 10 μg were dissolved in 100 μl of methanol, passed through a 0.45 μm disposable PTFE filter, and then used for GC-MS (AutoSystem XLGC/TurboMass MS) analysis. To qualitatively analyze the chemical composition of the extracts, GC-MS was used in combination with computer retrieval technology. The normalized gas chromatographic peak area was used to evaluate the relative content of each component.

In Vivo Antagonistic Activity

In order to confirm the antagonistic potential of a selected T. asperellum strain ZJSX5003 from previous experiments based on its inhibition rate an in planta antagonistic experiment against FG were performed in greenhouse. For the in planta greenhouse experiment, maize seeds were surface sterilized in 2 % NaClO (Sodium hypochloride) for 3 min and 75 % ethanol for 2 min and then rinsed 3 times in sterile water. The seeds were then allowed to germinate on sterile wet filter paper in 9 cm at 25 °C for 48 h. and shown pots containing 4 kg sterilized loamy and clay nature of native agriculture soil.

The conidia and mycelia fragments of T. asperellum strain ZJSX5003 were harvested from the surface of 7-day-old PDA culture and concentrated to approximately 1 × 106 conidia/ml by centrifugation. The following two treatments were maintained: (1) CK (soil inoculated with FG alone); and, (2) T1 (Soil inoculated with T. asperellum strain ZJSX5003 and FG). Two days before sowing the germinated maize seeds, the soil was inoculated with FG at a rate of 5 g of FG biomass/kg of soil. Subsequently, the soil was amended with 20 ml spore suspension of T. asperellum strain ZJSX5003 per pot and disease incidence was recorded 7 days after T. asperellum strain ZJSX5003 treatment according to corn stalk rot (CSR) classification standards [21]. The evaluation of disease was based on a scale for leaf spot disease from grade zero to grade five. Grade zero: no disease spot; Grade 1: no more than 10 %; Grade 2: 11–30 %; Grade 3: 31–50 %; Grade 4: 51–70 %; and Grade 5: more than 70 % and the disease index calculation with the following formula:

Disease index = Σ (number of plants in each disease stage × levels value)/(total number of plants × the highest levels × 100).

The disease reduction was computed with the following formula:

Disease reduction = the disease index of CK—disease index after treatment of T. asperellum strain ZJSX5003.

Statistical Analysis

SPSS version 20.0 statistical software package (IBM Corp. Released 2011. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.) was used for principal component analysis (PCA) for peptaibols screening and discriminant analysis for influencing factors for antagonist assay in which 13 variables were included (Table 2). Main component was established by multiple linear regression equation based on eigenvalues. Each eigenvalue represents the amount of standardized variance that was captured by a single component. In order to assess the significance between Trichoderma species, a ANOVA test (one way classifications) with Duncan Post hoc multiple comparison was used on antagonistic and enzyme activity experiments.

Table 2.

The selected list of antagonistic activity influencing factors of Trichoderma against pathogen: F. graminearum Schw for the statistical evaluation study

Factors Code Trichoderma strains
SH2303 GDFS1009 ZJSX5003 ZJSX5002 HNLY1002 HNCS4002 GDZQ1008 GDFS5001
Chitinase activity (U) x1 4.14 ± 1.2d 3.61 ± 0.2c 4.07 ± 0.5d 3.72 ± 1.2c 2.44 ± 1.5b 2.84 ± 1.2b 2.89 ± 1.2b 1.20 ± 0.2a
β-1,3-glucanase activity (U) x2 0.59 ± 0.2b 0.6 ± 0.3c 0.80 ± 0.2d 0.50 ± 0.5b 0.66 ± 0.2c 0.72 ± 0.5d 0.45 ± 0.3a 0.62 ± 0.3c
Protease activity (U) x3 2.48 ± 0.9b 2.48 ± 0.8b 4.85 ± 0.8d 1.72 ± 0.5a 3.13 ± 1.2c 2.6485 ± 0.2b 3.8107 ± 0.5c 2.38 ± 08b
Peptaibol number x4 2 ± 0.2a 6 ± 1.5c 7 ± 1.4cd 4 ± 1.5b 3 ± 0.8b 1 ± 0.6a 9 ± 2.4d 1 ± 0.1a
Polyketides (relative %) x5 2.40 ± 0.5b 1.15 ± 0.6a 3.84 ± 1.5c 2.20 ± 1.2b 0.40 ± 0.1a 6.01 ± 1.5d 3.75 ± 1.6c 5.28 ± 1.2cd
Terpenes (relative %) x6 14.53 ± 0.6cd 0.00 ± 0.0a 22.18 ± 4.6d 2.22 ± 0.5a 1.43 ± 0.6a 4.05 ± 2.4b 9.87 ± 1.4c 1.94 ± 0.7a
Alkane-including hydrocarbon (%) x7 0.00 ± 0.0a 15.30 ± 1.2c 21.18 ± 2.5d 16.38 ± 2.6cd 22.46 ± 2.5d 0.00 ± 0.0a 25.86 ± 3.5d 5.98 ± 0.9b
Carboxylic acids and derivatives x8 17.34 ± 1.5b 18.42 ± 1.5b 45.09 ± 5.6d 18.55 ± 1.5b 37.18 ± 4.5c 13.09 ± 1.5a 28.79 ± 1.8cd 60.14 ± 4.2e
Aldehyde-including hydrocarbon (%) x9 0.22 ± 0.1a 0.23 ± 0.1a 0.18 ± 0.1a 14.49 ± 2.5c 1.81 ± 0.6bb 1.86 ± 0.6b 0.69 ± 0.5a 1.59 ± 0.6b
Nitrogen heterocyclic compounds x10 2.02 ± 0.2a 14.40 ± 1.2d 2.97 ± 1.5a 2.41 ± 0.8a 6.41 ± 1.5 7.93 ± 2.4cd 5.36 ± 1.4c 3.98 ± 1.2b
Alcohols (%) x11 0.00 ± 0.0a 0.21 ± 0.1b 0.05 ± 0.0a 2.42 ± 0.9cd 0.22 ± 0.1b 3.44 ± 1.6d 1.30 ± 0.8c 0.16 ± 0.05b
Inhibitory rate of pathogen in vitro (%) x12 74.12 ± 5.6d 68.24 ± 6.5b 74.48 ± 3.5d 66.10 ± 5.8b 71.3 ± 42.6c 65.85 ± 5.6b 65.09 ± 5.2b 43.53 ± 5.4a
Antagonistic effect of pathogen (%) x13 64.28 ± 2.6d 66.67 ± 7.5d 70.67 ± 2.5e 48 ± 4.5b 55.11 ± 4.5c 55.11 ± 4.5c 63.11 ± 4.9d 16.18 ± 1.9a

The results showed mean value ± standard error (n = 3), one way ANOVA followed by multiple comparison of Duncan test

The different alphabets in the superscript differ significantly (p < 0.05) between the Trichoderma strains

Results

In Vitro Antagonistic Activity of T. asperellum Isolates

The eight Trichoderma strains (including one positive control) exhibited different inhibition rates against FG (Fig. 1a). The maximum inhibition was recorded with strain ZJSX5003 which was 0.48 % higher compared to positive control strain SH2303 (Fig. 1a, b).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

a In vitro antagonistic activity of different T. asperellum strains and positive control of T. harzianum SH2303 against F. graminearum. Results shown are mean ± SEM (n = 3), bars with a same letters are not statistically different among the antagonistic activity of Trichoderma strains following Duncan’s test (p < 0.05). b In vitro antagonist activity; a Fusarium graminearum on PDA petri dish, b antagonism of T. asperellum strain ZJSX5003 (T) against Fusarium graminearum (FG)

Cell Wall-Degrading Enzyme Activity

Cell wall-degrading enzyme (CWDEs) activity was measured in eight strains of Trichoderma including the positive control. CWDEs such as chitinase, β-1,3-glucanase, and protease activity significantly varied between the tested strains (Fig. 2). The chitinase activity was generally less compared to positive control (strain SG3403) excepting in the case of the ZJSX5003 test strain, in which higher (4 U/L). β-1,3-glucanase activity was 26 % higher in T. asperellum ZJSX5003 than in the positive control (strain SG3403) whereas the protease activity was 47 % higher in T. asperellum ZJSX5003.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Cell wall-degrading enzyme activity of Trichoderma strains, results shown are mean ± SEM (n = 3), bars with a same letters are not statistically different among the enzyme activity of Trichoderma strains following Duncan’s test (p < 0.05)

Identification of Peptaibols and Secondary Metabolites in Trichoderma

A total of 30 peptaibiotics were detected in eight Trichoderma culture filtrate using UPLC-Q-TOF-MS (Supplementary Table 2) and seven classes of secondary metabolites were identified through GC-MS (Table 1; Supplementary Table 3). The kinds of peptaibols and secondary metabolites varied between different Trichoderma spp. The ZJSX5003 and GDZQ1008 strains produced more than seven kinds of peptaibols compared with other T.asperellum strains. The enzymes, peptaibol and secondary metabolites data were mean-centered with unit variance scaling for statistical analysis. Discriminant analysis was performed to observe the correlation of peptaibols, CWDEs and secondary metabolites in relation to antagonistic activity of the Trichoderma strains.

Table 1.

Secondary metabolites and their concentration produced by Trichoderma strains were analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS)

Trichoderma strains Content of antibiosis secondary metabolites (%)
Polyketides Terpenes CAD NHC Alkanes Ethanols Aldehydes
SH2303 3.42 ± 0.2d 11.82 ± 1.5d 15.04 ± 1.2a 1.99 ± 0.5a 34.96 ± 2.3d 2.59 ± 1.2c 0.00 ± 0.0a
ZJSX5003 3.84 ± 0.8d 22.18 ± 3.2d 18.42 ± 5.6a 2.97 ± 0.8b 21.18 ± 1.5c 0.05 ± 0.0a 0.18 ± 0.1a
GDFS1009 1.15 ± 0.5b 0.00 ± 0.0a 45.09 ± 8.9c 14.40 ± 1.4 15.30 ± 3.2b 0.21 ± 0.1a 0.23 ± 0.1a
ZJSX5002 2.20 ± 0.9c 2.22 ± 0.8a 18.55 ± 4.5a 2.41 ± 0.5b 16.38 ± 1.5b 2.42 ± 0.5c 14.49 ± 2.5c
HNLY1002 0.40 ± 0.1a 1.43 ± 0.6a 37.18 ± 6.5c 6.41 ± 2.5c 22.46 ± 2.3c 0.22 ± 0.1a 1.81 ± 0.5b
HNCS4002 6.01 ± 1.5e 4.05 ± 1.2b 13.09 ± 2.5a 7.93 ± 1.5d 21.05 ± 6.2c 3.44 ± 1.2d 1.86 ± 0.6b
GDZQ1008 3.75 ± 0.9d 9.87 ± 2.5c 28.79 ± 8.5b 5.36 ± 1.2c 25.86 ± 1.4c 1.30 ± 0.9b 0.69 ± 0.2a
GDFS5001 5.28 ± 0.5e 1.94 ± 0.8a 60.14 ± 7.2d 3.98 ± 1.2bc 5.98 ± 3.2a 0.16 ± 0.1a 1.59 ± 0.8b

The results showed mean value ± standard error (n = 3), one way ANOVA followed by multiple comparison of Duncan test

CAD carboxylic acids and derivatives, NHC nitrogen heterocyclic compounds; The different alphabets in the superscript differ significantly (p < 0.05) between the Trichoderma strains

Discriminant Analysis

In order to assess the correlation between the Trichoderma derived CWDEs, peptaibols, and secondary metabolites in relation to in vitro inhibitory rates (%) against pathogens FG. 13 relevant variables were subjected to discriminant (Table 2). The five most important components explained nearly 90 % of the variation in the original 13 variables. The screen plot determined the optimal number of components as five. Thus, the first five components were used in the linear regression model.

The five factors were selected were chitinase activity, β-1,3-glucanase activity, extracellular protease activity, peptaibol quantity, and polyketide quantity and these were selected for a linear regression model. The first three components accounted for 38.1, 19.8, 13.0 % of the variance, totaling 70.9 %. In other words, chitinase, β-1,3-glucanase and extracellular protease activity could influence the biocontrol results in this study. Orthogonal vectors and the eigenvector matrix were standardized and the five principal component scores were obtained based on the standardized orthogonal feature matrix. The relationship between biocontrol potential and the five most important variables was arrived at with the following linear regression model equation:

Y=0.3810y1+0.19082y2+013039y3+0.11192y4+0.07241y5 1

where Y is the integrated evaluation value of the synthesized five principal components and y is the principal component score after standardization.

Based on this equation, T. asperellum ZJSX5003 exhibited the highest correlation value (1.266), followed by CDZQ1008 (0.470) and GDFS1009 (0.213) (Table 3). The positive control T. harzianum SH2303 had an average value of 0.572.

Table 3.

Principal components analysis and comprehensive scores

Trichoderma y1 y2 y3 y4 y5 Y
SH2303 1.379 −0.396 1.550 −0.981 0.446 0.572
GDFS1009 1.349 −0.505 −2.639 1.147 0.208 0.213
ZJSX5003 1.193 3.583 0.769 0.197 −0.279 1.266
ZJSX5002 0.687 −2.707 0.212 −1.628 −0.706 −0.480
HNLY1002 0.040 0.279 −1.670 −0.093 −0.527 −0.196
HNCS4002 −0.294 −1.487 1.357 2.333 1.257 0.123
GDZQ1008 1.063 0.862 −0.405 −1.469 1.536 0.470
GDFS5001 −6.186 0.406 −0.092 −0.363 −0.024 −2.331

Among these strains, T. asperellum ZJSX5003, GDFS1009, and GDZQ1008 were observed far from the midline axis and showed significant antagonistic and diversified peptaibols (p < 0.05; Fig. 3a, b; Table 3). The three Trichoderma strains contained significantly different types of peptaibols (p < 0.01) as follows: Trichovirin-Ib in T. asperellum ZJSX5003, Trichotoxin_A-50_F in T. asperellum GDFS1009, and Trichorzin_HA_III, Trichotoxin_A-40, and Hypomurocin_B_IV in T. asperellum GDZQ1008. Therefore, a total of five peptaibols are the potential factors that influenced the biocontrol activity of Trichoderma.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

A partial least-squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) model of the UPLC-QTOF-MS spectral data of peptaibols present in different Trichoderma strains, a the scores plot of differential Trichoderma strains based on analysis differential peptaibols spots, the horizontal and vertical axis indicate differences between groups and within groups, b the loading plot show the correlation analysis of which peptaibols are the major components that determine the difference in Trichoderma strains

Polyketides and terpenes showed a positive correlation with antagonism of Trichoderma. Polyketones (i.e. pyrones, 6PP) and terpenes with broad and high antagonizing activity were recorded as ZJSX5003 (26 %), SG3403 (17 %), SG2303 (15 %), and GDZQ1008 (14 %). Carboxylic acids and their derivatives were abundant in strain ZJSX5003 (18 %). Thus, the strain ZJSX5003 seemed to be better at antagonism and growth promotion.

This model predicted results were consistent with the laboratory experimental results of in vitro antagonistic activity and enzyme activity, in addition the greenhouse experiments also confirmed the strain ZJSX5003 as potent to control FG a casual agent of CSR in maize with disease reduction of 71 % (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Effect of T. asperellum ZJSX5003 treatment on biological control of CSR caused by FG, CK (Soil inoculated with FG alone), T1 Soil inoculated with T. asperellum strain ZJSX5003 and FG)

Discussion

The biological control of corn stalk rot (CSR) in maize crops would greatly increase the production of corn worldwide. Several control strategies, such as the selection of resistant corn varieties, improved cultivation techniques, seed coating treatments, and use of biological control agents have been attempted. The seed coating is not effective against CSR due to its non-lasting preventative effects after the seedling stage. However, Several Trichoderma agents are commercially available as BCAs against CSR but their effects, virulence and mechanisms are not clear. Therefore, in this study, the antagonistic activity of eight T. asperellum strains was compared for the selecting the effective antagonist stain against CSR caused by FG.

The main factors such as hydrolytic enzymes (chitinase, β-1,3-glucanase, protease) and secondary metabolites (peptaibols and polyketides) significantly contributed to antagonistic activity of Trichoderma against FG. The components of antagonistic function of the Trichoderma could be due to the effects of chitinase, β-1,3-glucanase, protease, peptaibols, and polyketides. Mycoparasitism is usually mediated by a set of CWDEs and these also seem to play a role in Trichoderma’s antagonistic effects against Fusarium [22, 23]. Comparative genomic studies revealed that Trichoderma evolved from a mycoparasitic ancestor [24, 25] Six out of 30 T. asperellum isolates showed high antagonistic activity against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici isolates due to production of high amounts of CWDEs.

Trichoderma spp., have an active metabolism and they can produce large amounts of enzymes that act as potent weapons against other non beneficial fungi [26]. Trichoderma spp., also secrete a chemically diverse range of secondary metabolites, including peptaibols, polyketides, pyrones, terpenes, and polypeptides [27, 28]. A previous study reported on the significance of secondary metabolites in the antagonistic action of Trichoderma spp., against the pathogenic fungi Pythium ultimum and Rhizoctonia solani [10, 29]. We also found that Trichoderma produced a diverse group of metabolites that were species-specific. The antagonistic effects of T.asperellum isolate ZJSX5003 were positively correlated with their production of peptaibols and polyketides. Similarly, T. asperellum produced rich volatile and secondary metabolites which are effective biocontrol agents against pathogens such as F. oxysporum,R. solani and P. ultimum [26]. Each compound exhibits a specific antibiotic activity and each Trichoderma strain hasd different antagonistic effect on different pathogens. Secondary metabolites serve a pivotal function in antagonistic activities against Fusarium and also act as sporogenic factors and growth promoters that affect morphological differentiation in mycoparasitic Trichoderma [30, 31]. In view of this specific secondary metabolites could be of a commercially viable alternative for controlling phytopathogens rather than whole organism formulations [31].

The challenge remains to determine which secondary metabolites would be most effective in mitigating the effects of Fusarium and how they can be applied to corn seedlings for a sustainable effect. Differential antagonism activity has been observed for Trichoderma isolates belonging to the same species, as shown by a semi-specificity in the interaction of Trichoderma with spores of Botrytis cinerea and M. phaseolina [32, 33]. Testing for the strain of Trichoderma with the highest antagonistic activity is important for developing biocontrol agents. A correlation result of this study indicated that hydrolytic enzyme and some metabolites played a key role in controlling CSR. In particular, chitinase was the most highly correlated hydrolytic enzyme, emphasizing its relevance for biocontrol of FG. This result is consistent with the hypothesis that Trichoderma sp., are able to repress pathogen through synchronization of mycoparasitism and antibiotic production [22, 34, 35].

Finally, we detected 70 different chemical compounds in T. asperellum ZJSX5003. The isolates produced more secondary metabolites than other strains tested including alkanes (21 %), terpenes (22 %), carboxylic acids and derivatives (18 %), and others. These metabolites promote the transfer of soil insoluble elements, such as phosphorus, iron, and manganese into soluble nutrients available for plants, and promote plant growth and also increase immunity. Our in vivo greenhouse test confirmed that T.asperellum ZJSX5003 is an effective potential strain against FG.

Conclusion

Integration of the antagonistic assay in vivo and in vitro and the metabolic data gathered suggested that T. asperellum ZJSX5003 had the best antagonistic activity and was the most promising antagonist against the pathogen FG. This study lays the foundation for using T. asperellum ZJSX5003 as a biocontrol of CSR in field situations paving the way for the use of this strain in understanding the molecular basis of fungal antagonism and their exploitation in improving crop production.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Acknowledgments

We thank the financial support from the Special Project of Basic Work for Science and Technology (2014FY120900), the key project of the basic research of Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Commission (12JC1404600), Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31201557), Natural Science Fund of Shanghai (No.12ZR1414100), the special fund of Modern Agricultural Industry Technology System (CARS-02), Ministry of Education University Doctoral Foundation (No. 20120073120070), and the SJTU Medical-Engineering Cross Research Fund (No. YG2015MS37).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1.Marasas WFO, Nelson PE, Toussoun TA. Toxigenic Fusarium species: identity and mycotoxicology. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press; 1984. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Harman GE, Howell CR, Viterbo A, Chet I, Lorito M. Trichoderma species—opportunistic, avirulent plant symbionts. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004;2:43–56. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lorito M, Farkas V, Rebuffat S, Bodo B, Kubicek CP. Cell wall synthesis is a major target of mycoparasitic antagonism by Trichoderma harzianum. J Bacteriol. 1996;178:6382–6385. doi: 10.1128/jb.178.21.6382-6385.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Harman GE, Herrera-Estrella AH, Horwitz BA, Lorito M. Special issue: Trichoderma—from basic biology to biotechnology. Microbiology. 2012;158:1–2. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.056424-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Schmoll M, Schuster A. Biology and biotechnology of Trichoderma. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010;87:787–799. doi: 10.1007/s00253-010-2632-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Shoresh M, Mastouri F, Harman G. Induced systemic resistance and plant responses to fungal biocontrol agents. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2010;48:21–43. doi: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-073009-114450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lorito M, Woo SL, Harman GE, Monte E. Translational research on Trichoderma: from ‘omics to the field. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2010;48:395–417. doi: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-073009-114314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chet T. Trichoderma—application, mode of action, and potential as a biocontrol agent of soil-borne plant pathogenic fungi. In: Chet P, editor. Innovative approaches to plant disease control. New York: Wiley; 1987. pp. 137–160. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wiest A, Grzegorski D, Xu BW, Goulard C, Rebuffat S, Ebbole DJ, Bodo B, Kenerley C. Identification of peptaibols from Trichoderma virens and cloning of a peptaibols synthetase. J Biol Chem. 2002;227:20862–20868. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M201654200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Vinale F, Marra R, Scala F, Ghisalberti EL, Lorito M, Sivasithamparam K. Major secondary metabolites produced by two commercial Trichoderma strains active against different phytopathogens. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2006;43:143–148. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2006.01939.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sun R (2013) Resource collection, identification and biocontrol evaluation of Trichoderma isolated from Southern China. Master thesis, Shanghai Jiao Tong University
  • 12.Wang B, LI G, Guo Y, Chen J. Comparison of antagonistic effects of four Trichoderma strains. Chin J Biol Control. 2012;28:147–151. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Morton DJ, Stroube WH. Antagonistic and stimulating effects of soil micro-organism of Sclerotium. Phytopathology. 1955;45:417–420. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Li Y, Fu K, Gao S, Wu Q, Fan L, Chen J. Impact on bacterial community in midguts of the Asian Corn Borer Larvae by transgenic Trichoderma strain overexpressing a heterologous chit42 gene with chitin-binding domain. PLoS One. 2013;8:e55555. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Silva BDS, Ulhoa CJ, Batista KA, Yamashita F, Fernandes KF. Potential fungal inhibition by immobilized hydrolytic enzymes from trichoderma asperellum. J Agri Food Chem. 2011;59:8148–8154. doi: 10.1021/jf2009815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Noronha EF, Ulhoa CJ. Characterization of a 29-kDa beta-1,3-glucanase from Trichoderma harzianum. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2000;183:119–123. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2000.tb08944.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951;193:265–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Xie G, Zheng X, Qi X, Cao Y, Chi Y, Su M, Ni Y, Qiu Y, Liu Y, Li H, Zhao A, Jia W. Metabonomic evaluation of melamine-induced acute renal toxicity in rats. J Proteome Res. 2010;9:125–133. doi: 10.1021/pr900333h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Xie G, Ye M, Wang Y, Ni Y, Su M, Huang H, Qiu M, Zhao A, Zheng X, Chen T, Jia W. Characterization of Pu-erh tea using chemical and metabolic profiling approaches. J Agric Food Chem. 2009;57:3046–3054. doi: 10.1021/jf804000y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ni Y, Su MM, Qiu YP, Chen MJ, Liu YM, Zhao AH, Jia W. Metabolic profiling using combined GC-MS and LC-MSprovides a systems understanding of aristolochic acid-induced nephrotoxicity in rat. FEBS Lett. 2007;581:707–711. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2007.01.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Li J, Fu J, Yan X, Li H. Analysis of temporal dynamics of Curvularia leaf spot of maize (Curvularia lunata) epidemic and yield loss. J Shengyang Agric Univ. 2006;37:835–838. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Viterbo A, Ramot O, Chemin L, Chet I. Significance of lytic enzymes from Trichoderma spp. in the biocontrol of fungal plant pathogens. Anton Leeuw Int J. 2002;81:549–556. doi: 10.1023/A:1020553421740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Qualhato TF, Lopes FAC, Steindorff AS, Brandão RS, Jesuino RSA, Ulhoa CJ. Mycoparasitism studies of Trichoderma species against three phytopathogenic fungi: evaluation of antagonism and hydrolytic enzyme production. Biotechnol Lett. 2013;35:1461–1468. doi: 10.1007/s10529-013-1225-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Atanasova L, Crom SL, Gruber S, Coulpier F, Seidl-Seiboth V, Kubicek CP, Druzhinina IS. Comparative transcriptomics reveals different strategies of Trichoderma mycoparasitism. BMC Genom. 2013;14:121. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Mahmoud HE, Amgad AS, Anas E, Younes YM. Characterization of novel Trichoderma asperellum isolates to select effective biocontrol agents against tomato fusarium wilt. Plant Pathol J. 2015;31:50–60. doi: 10.5423/PPJ.OA.12.2014.0127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Rodríguez MA, Cabrera G, Godeas A. Soil-borne fungi act as biocontrol agents: the role of antifungal metabolite production. In: Brar SK, editor. Biocontrol: management, process and challenges. New York: Nova Science Publishers; 2012. pp. 63–80. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Daniel JF, Filho ER. Peptaibols of Trichoderma. Nat Prod Rep. 2007;24:1128–1141. doi: 10.1039/b618086h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Szekeres A, Leitgeb B, Kredics L, Antal Z, Hatvani L, Manczinger L, Vagvolgyi C. Peptaibols and related peptaibiotics of Trichoderma. A review. Acta Microbiol Immunol Hung. 2005;52:137–168. doi: 10.1556/AMicr.52.2005.2.2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Dubey SC, Tripathi A, Dureja P, Grover A. Characterization of secondary metabolites and enzymes produced by Trichoderma species and their efficacy against plant pathogenic fungi. Indian J Agr Sci. 2011;81:455–461. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Luo Y, Zhang DD, Dong XW, Zhao PB, Chen LL, Song XY, Wang XJ, Chen XL, Shi M, Zhang YZ. Antimicrobial peptaibols induce defense responses and systemic resistance in tobacco against tobacco mosaic virus. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2010;313:120–126. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2010.02135.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Keswani C, Mishra S, Sarma BK, Singh SP, Singh HB. Unraveling the efficient applications of secondary metabolites of various Trichoderma spp. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014;98:533–544. doi: 10.1007/s00253-013-5344-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Sanz L, Montero M, Grondona I, Vizcaíno JA, Llobell A, Hermosa R, Monte E. Cell wall-degrading isoenzyme profiles of Trichoderma biocontrol strains show correlation with rDNA taxonomic species. Curr Genet. 2004;46:277–286. doi: 10.1007/s00294-004-0532-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Larralde-Corona CP, Santiago-Mena MR, Sifuentes-Rincon AM, Rodriguez-Luna IC, Rodriguez-Perez MA, Shirai K, Narvaez-Zapata JA. Biocontrol potential and polyphasic characterization of novel native Trichoderma strains against Macrophomina phaseolina isolated from sorghum and common bean. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008;80:167–177. doi: 10.1007/s00253-008-1532-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Saravanakumar K, Yu C, Dou K, Wang M, Li Y, Chen J. Synergistic effect of Trichoderma-derived antifungal metabolites and cell wall degrading enzymes on enhanced biocontrol of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum. Biol Control. 2016;94:37–46. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2015.12.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Lorito M, Peterbauer C, Hayes CK, Harman GE. Synergistic interaction between fungal cell wall degrading enzymes and different antifungal compounds enhances inhibition of spore germination. Microbiology. 1994;140:623–629. doi: 10.1099/00221287-140-3-623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials


Articles from Indian Journal of Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES