Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry logoLink to Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry
. 1976 Feb;39(2):114–121. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.39.2.114

Observations on sensory and sympathetic function during intrathecal analgesia.

P W Nathan
PMCID: PMC492235  PMID: 1262887

Abstract

A dilute solution of procaine in glucose solution was injected by slow drip into the lumbar theca of patients to cause a differential block. Vasodilatation of the skin vessels of the lower limbs always occurred before any change in sensibility. The first changes in sensibility were inability to fell painful stimuli and warm stimuli; these two forms of sensibility were usually coextensive and occurred at the same time. When this was not so, either form of sensibility could be more extensively disturbed than the other. When warmth sensibility was removed, cold sensibility was either normal or diminished or cold stimuli caused non-thermal sensations such as non-thermal wetness or pressure. It is concluded that the nerve fibres signalling warmth are the smaller delta fibres or non-myelinated fibres or both. As two groups of investigators who recorded from the non-myelinated fibres in man found no non-myelinated fibres responding to cold, it is condluded that fibres signalling cold cover the same delta range as those signalling warmth, together with a proportion of larger delta fibres. When fibres subserving pain, warmth, and cold were blocked, tactile sensibility could be normal. It is concluded that, if there are tactile fibres in man in the smaller delta and non-myelinated ranges, their contribution to tactile sensibility is insignificant. It is also concluded that the pre-galglionic B fibres are the most susceptible of all fibres of the nerve roots to local anaesthetic agents. On two occasions, piloerection occurred when the pre-ganglionic sympathetic fibres were blocked. In two patients spontaneous itching occurred when all peripheral nerve fibres were blocked except large tactile fibres.

Full text

PDF
114

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Darian-Smith I., Johnson K. O., Dykes R. "Cold" fiber population innervating palmar and digital skin of the monkey: responses to cooling pulses. J Neurophysiol. 1973 Mar;36(2):325–346. doi: 10.1152/jn.1973.36.2.325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hagbarth K. E., Vallbo A. B. Mechanoreceptor activity recorded percutaneously with semi-microelectrodes in human peripheral nerves. Acta Physiol Scand. 1967 Jan-Feb;69(1):121–122. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1967.tb03498.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hallin R. G., Torebjörk H. E. Afferent and efferent C units recorded from human skin nerves in situ. A preliminary report. Acta Soc Med Ups. 1970;75(5-6):277–281. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Heavner J. E., de Jong R. H. Lidocaine blocking concentrations for B- and C-nerve fibers. Anesthesiology. 1974 Mar;40(3):228–233. doi: 10.1097/00000542-197403000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Iggo A. Cutaneous thermoreceptors in primates and sub-primates. J Physiol. 1969 Feb;200(2):403–430. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Iggo A., Ogawa H. Primate cutaneous thermal nociceptors. J Physiol. 1971 Jul;216(2):77P–78P. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Johnson K. O., Darian-Smith I., LaMotte C. Peripheral neural determinants of temperature discrimination in man: a correlative study of responses to cooling skin. J Neurophysiol. 1973 Mar;36(2):347–370. doi: 10.1152/jn.1973.36.2.347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Long R. R. Cold fiber heat sensitivity: dependency of "paradoxical" discharge on body temperature. Brain Res. 1973 Dec 7;63:389–392. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(73)90110-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Martin H. F., Manning J. W. Rapid thermal cutaneous stimulation: peripheral nerve responses. Brain Res. 1969 Dec;16(2):524–526. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(69)90246-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Martin H. F., Manning J. W. Response of A -fibers of peripheral nerve to warming of cutaneous fields. Brain Res. 1972 Aug 25;43(2):653–656. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(72)90424-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. NATHAN P. W., SEARS T. A. Differential nerve block by sodium free and sodium-deficient solutions. J Physiol. 1962 Dec;164:375–394. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp007027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. NATHAN P. W., SEARS T. A. Some factors concerned in differential nerve block by local anaesthetics. J Physiol. 1961 Aug;157:565–580. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1961.sp006743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Nathan P. W. Motor effects of differential block of spinal roots in spastic patients. J Neurol Sci. 1969 Jan-Feb;8(1):19–26. doi: 10.1016/0022-510x(69)90038-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Pick J., Sheehan D. Sympathetic rami in man. J Anat. 1946 Jan;80(Pt 1):12–20.3. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Torebjörk H. E. Afferent C units responding to mechanical, thermal and chemical stimuli in human non-glabrous skin. Acta Physiol Scand. 1974 Nov;92(3):374–390. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1974.tb05755.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Torebjörk H. E., Hallin R. G. C-fibre units recorded from human sensory nerve fascicles in situ. A preliminary report. Acta Soc Med Ups. 1970;75(1-2):81–84. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Van Hees J., Gybels J. M. Pain related to single afferent C fibers from human skin. Brain Res. 1972 Dec 24;48:397–400. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(72)90198-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES