In vitro-activated tumor-specific T lymphocytes prolong the survival of patients with advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective cohort study

Abstract

Background

Conventional tumor managements have limited survival benefits and cause severely impaired immune function in patients with advanced gastric cancer (GC) whereas immunotherapies could restore antitumor immunity. This prospective cohort study was aimed at investigating the efficacy of in vitro-activated tumor-specific T lymphocytes combined with chemotherapy on the survival of patients with advanced GC.

Patients and methods

Two hundred and seventy-four postoperative patients were enrolled in this study to receive either activated T lymphocytes immunotherapy combining chemotherapy (71 patients) or only receive postoperative chemotherapy (203 patients). Overall survival was analyzed by the Kaplan–Meier with log-rank test and Cox’s regression methods.

Results

The immunotherapy prolonged 9.8-month median survival for advanced gastric cancer (29.70 vs 19.70 months, P=0.036). Furthermore, immunotherapy significantly benefited the survival of patients who underwent radical, palliative resection, and stage III malignancy. No serious adverse effect was observed in the immunotherapy group.

Conclusion

In vitro-activated tumor-specific T lymphocytes prolonged survival in patients with advanced GC.

Introduction

Gastric cancer (GC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide and also accounts for the third highest cancer mortality rate in the People’s Republic of China.^1,2 Many patients with GC are diagnosed at an advanced stage because GC is characterized by frequently asymptomatic at early stages.³ Although standardized comprehensive therapies of surgical resection, adjuvant chemotherapy, and radiotherapy have been widely used for the management of patients with advanced GC, the efficacy of these therapies and the survival rates of patients with advanced GC remain low.⁴ Recently, immunotherapy has become a promising strategy for the treatment of several types of cancers and some immunotherapies have been approved for clinic use by the Food and Drug Administration of USA.⁵ However, little is known about immunotherapy for patients with advanced GC.

Various immunocytes are used for immunotherapy in cancer, such as dendritic cell (DC)-based vaccine, natural killer cells, and cytokine-induced killer cells.^6–11 Many studies have tested the efficacy of adoptive transfer of these immune cells in animal models and in the clinic; however, efficacy is limited for solid cancer owing to tumor specific lacking of immune cells.¹² Therefore, development of a more tumor-specific immunotherapy approach for preventing cancer metastasis and recurrence after surgery is required for further promoting the survival of advanced GC patients.

T lymphocytes activated through tumor lysate-pulsed autologous DC cells can induce more specific antitumor immunity against the resident tumor cells after treatment and provide more effective therapeutic effect;¹³ otherwise, patients suffer severe immunosuppression within 7–14 days after surgery.¹⁴ Administration of T lymphocytes during the perioperative period may restore antitumor immunity as soon as possible and thus inhibit metastasis and recurrence. Patients with advanced GC have susceptibility to local recurrence, peritoneal implantation, and hematogenous metastasis. Administration of T lymphocytes via intravenous and intraperitoneal approaches may have more comprehensive effects on metastasis and recurrence. In this study, a single-center prospective clinical trial was performed to validate the efficacy and safety of postoperative immunotherapy with in vitro-activated T lymphocytes for patients with advanced GC through various therapeutic approaches at different postoperative treatment points.

Patients and methods

Patients

Two hundred and seventy-four patients who had undergone surgery for primary GC at the First Affiliated Hospital of Xin-Xiang Medical University from June 2, 2010 to July 1, 2014 were recruited in this study, including 71 patients who received chemotherapy and multi-immunocytes treatment in the immunotherapy group. Two hundred and three patients who received chemotherapy alone within the corresponding period were enrolled as the control group. Inclusion criteria were histologically confirmed stage III or IV GC, over 18 years of age, and a life expectancy of >24 weeks. The exclusion criteria were acute and severe postoperative complications, active uncontrolled infection, acute and chronic comorbidities, and death due to other causes. Written informed consent was obtained from individual patients. The study protocol was approved by the Institute Review Board of the Xin-Xiang Medical University.

Treatment

According to the 2014 National Comprehensive Cancer Network clinical practice guidelines in oncology, all patients in this study were treated with standard curative resection and postoperative standard chemotherapeutic regimens, including epirubicin, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil or docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil. A total of 77 patients in the immunotherapy group received postoperative immunotherapy within 14 days after surgery, and immunocytes were administrated after every two cycles of chemotherapy. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated from peripheral blood of patients for preparing T lymphocytes. Individual patients were sequentially administrated one part of T lymphocytes (>1×10¹⁰) via the intraperitoneal approach on day 12 after PBMC collection and were intravenously transfused with the remaining part (>1×10¹⁰) after PBMC collection.

Follow-up

All the patients were followed up as outpatients, including physical examination and serum carcinoembryonic antigen test every 3 months for the first 2 years, every 6 months for the next 3 years, and once annually thereafter. Endoscopy or abdominal computerized tomography scans were obtained generally every 12 months. Clinical follow-up duration lasted from the date of surgery to either the time of death or July 2015.

Generation of activated T lymphocytes

Tumor samples of individual patients obtained during the surgery were mechanically dispersed to create a single-cell suspension, then incubated in a water bath at 60°C for 60 minutes to induce heat shock proteins. After three cycles of −80°C freeze/thaw, the cells were centrifuged at 4°C, 600× g for 60 minutes. The supernatants were filtrated through a 0.2 μm filter, and the concentrations of proteins in the supernatants were determined as tumor-specific antigens, which were stored at −80°C until use.

PBMCs at 6×10⁶ cells/mL were isolated from the blood of individual patients by Ficoll-Hypaque (Haoyang Biological Manufacture, Tianjin, People’s Republic of China) gradient centrifugation and then cultured at 37°C for 3 hours. Tumor lysate-loaded DCs were generated by the routine method from the adherent PBMCs.^15,16 The nonadherent PBMCs (1×10⁵ cells/mL) were stimulated with anti-CD3 (20 μg/mL) in the presence of recombinant human interferon gamma (200 U/mL) and recombinant human interleukin-2 (200 U/mL) in T-cell media for 7 days. On day 8, the activated T lymphocytes (1×10⁶/mL) were cultured with 1×10⁷/mL of tumor lysate-pulsed DCs in Cellix 602 media (Xinminglitai Biological Manufacture, Beijing, People’s Republic of China) for 4 days to generate activated tumor-specific T lymphocytes.

Quality and sterility control of the T lymphocytes

T lymphocytes were evaluated by flow cytometry using the FACSCalibur (Becton, Dickinson and Company, NJ, USA) flow cytometer before transferring to the patient. Briefly, cell samples were stained with different fluorescence-labeled antibodies against CD80/CD83/D86/HLA-DR for DCs and CD3/CD4/CD8/CD56 for T lymphocytes. Only cells with a viability of >95% were used for treatment. To reduce the potential risk of microbial contamination, all samples of the isolated and prepared cells were sent to a microbiology laboratory for analysis of potential organism contamination.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using SPSS software (version 20.0, IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA). Overall survival was defined as duration from the date of surgery to death, whereas recurrence-free survival was defined as the period from the date of surgery to recurrence. The chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test was used to compare different clinicopathologic characteristics between the two groups. Kaplan–Meier method was used to assess the effect of treatment on the 12- and 36-month survival rates, median survival time, and median follow-up time. The difference of 12- and 36-month survival rates between the immunotherapy and the control groups was analyzed using the chi-square test. The Cox regression model was used to assess the hazard ratio (HR) and multivariate analysis. A P-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Patients

A total of 274 patients, including 71 patients in the immunotherapy group and 203 in the control group, comprising 192 males and 82 females with an average age of 54±11.8 years were studied. Among these patients, 72 cases were diagnosed with gastric cardia cancer, whereas 130 patients presented as tumor located in the gastric body and 72 patients with gastric antrum cancer. According to the tumor-node-metastasis staging methods, 185 patients were stage III and 89 patients were stage IV. Moreover, 119 patients underwent radical resection, while 155 patients received palliative surgery. As expected, there was no significant difference in the distribution of age, sex, tumor site and size, pathologic differentiation, clinical stage, and surgical mode between the immunotherapy and control groups (Table 1).

Table 1.

Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of advanced gastric cancer patients

Characteristic	Control, N=203; n (%)	Immunotherapy, N=71; n (%)	P-value
Age (years)
Mean	57	54
Minimum	23	32
Maximum	86	75
Sex			0.114
Male	137 (67.5)	55 (77.5)
Female	66 (32.5)	16 (22.5)
Tumor site			0.506
Gastric cardia	50 (24.6)	22 (31.0)
Gastric body	100 (49.2)	30 (42.3)
Gastric antrum	53 (26.2)	19 (26.7)
Tumor size (cm)			0.498
<5	140 (69.0)	52 (73.2)
≥5	63 (31.0)	19 (26.8)
Differentiation			0.746
Well/moderate	116 (57.1)	39 (54.9)
Poor	87 (42.9)	32 (45.1)
Clinical stage			0.568
III	139 (68.5)	46 (64.8)
IV	64 (31.5)	25 (35.2)
Surgical procedure performed			0.816
Radical	89 (43.8)	30 (42.3)
Palliative	114 (56.2)	41 (57.7)

Quantity and quality of activated T lymphocytes and tumor lysate-loaded DCs

Median cell count of DCs has been achieved to approximately 4×10⁷ (0.2–8.0×10⁷) cells/mL after culturing in vitro for 8 days. Subsequently, phenotypic analysis of DCs showed that the median percentages (and range) of CD80⁺, CD83⁺, CD86⁺, and HLA-DR⁺ DCs were 86.52% (62.13%–97.54%), 72.48% (56.48%–97.66%), 88.64% (72.38%–98.33%), and 92.84% (80.12%–97.24%), respectively (Figure 1A). The median number of the available T lymphocytes was 4.57×10¹⁰ (0.8–8.7×10¹⁰). Furthermore, median percentages (and range) of CD3⁺CD8⁺ T-cells and CD3⁺CD56⁺ natural killer T-cells of T lymphocytes were 71.02% (62.13%–88.14%) and 34.62% (6.73%–48.57%), respectively (Figure 1B).

Figure 1.

Phenotypic analysis of DC and T-cells.

Notes: (A) Percentages (and range) of CD80⁺, CD83⁺, CD86⁺, and HLA-DR⁺ DCs were 86.52% (62.13%–97.54%), 72.48% (56.48%–97.66%), 88.64% (72.38%–98.33%), and 92.84% (80.12%–97.24%), respectively. (B) Median percentages (and range) of CD3⁺CD8⁺ T-cells and CD3⁺CD56⁺ NKT cells of T lymphocytes were 71.02% (62.13%–88.14%) and 34.62% (6.73%–48.57%).

Abbreviations: DC, dendritic cell; NKT, natural killer T-cells; HLA-DR, human leukocyte antigen-DR.

Treatment efficacy

Median follow-up duration was 16.4 months (6.1–79.57 months). At the end of this study, 184 (67.15%) of the 274 patients had died. Upon assessing the efficacy of available T lymphocytes for advanced GC, we found that patients in the immunotherapy group had a statistically significantly better postoperative prognosis than those in the control group with respect to overall median survival (29.70 vs 19.70 months, P=0.036) (Table 2; Figure 2). Otherwise, the clinical stage and surgical procedure also significantly influenced the prognosis of advanced GC (Table 2).

Table 2.

The prognostic characteristics of advanced gastric cancer patients

Characteristics	Univariate			Multivariate
	n	MS (months)	P-value	HR	95% CI	P-value
Age (years)			0.624
≥60	190	21.13
<60	84	22.33
Sex			0.632
Male	192	19.27
Female	82	26.80
Tumor site			0.136
Gastric cardia	72	20.17
Gastric body	130	22.52
Gastric antrum	72	10.38
Tumor size (cm)			0.370
≥5.0	192	20.52
<5	82	22.40
Differentiation			0.502
Well/moderate	155	22.87
Poor	119	21.13
Clinic stage			0.000	2.201	1.605–3.020	0.000
III	185	26.43
IV	89	14.27
Surgical procedure			0.001	0.548	0.403–0.745	0.000
Radical	119	29.70
Palliative	155	18.07
Immunotherapy			0.036	0.641	0.450–0.913	0.014
Yes	71	29.70
No	203	19.90

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; MS, median survival.

Figure 2.

Kaplan–Meier estimates of overall survival.

Notes: Panel shows the results of the analysis of efficacy of immunotherapy compared with control (median survival in immunotherapy, 29.70 months; in control, 19.90 months; P=0.036).

Tumor burden has been considered as an obvious factor influencing antitumor immune status. For patients who undergo palliative surgery, immunotherapy can prolong median survival by 9.4 months (immunotherapy, 26.33 months; control, 16.93 months, P=0.011). Similarly, patients who received immunotherapy had a longer median survival than patients in the control group after radical resection (36.63 vs 25.17 months, P=0.024). Furthermore, in the univariate analysis of recurrence-free survival in patients who underwent radical resection, patients who received immunotherapy had a better outcome than patients in the control group (30.00 vs 23.14 months, P=0.042) (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Survival estimation in different surgery methods.

Notes: (A) The results of the comparison analysis of the immunotherapy and control group of patients who received palliative resection (mean survival time immunotherapy, 26.33 months; in control, 16.93 months, P=0.011). (B) Similarity trend in patients who underwent radical surgery (36.63 vs 25.17 months, P=0.024). (C) Patients who received immunotherapy had a better survival benefit than controls in the radical resection group (30.00 vs 23.14 months, P=0.042).

When the influence of immunotherapy on stage II and IV GC were respectively accessed, we found that patients with stage III GC benefited from immunotherapy, showing a median survival of 36.63 months, which was longer than the control group (24.47 months, P=0.034). However, there was no significant difference between the immunotherapy and control groups in patients with stage IV GC (Figure 4).

Figure 4.

TNM stage-wise survivability.

Notes: (A) There was a statistically significant survival difference between immunotherapy and control group in stage III gastric cancer patients (median survival in immunotherapy, 36.63 months; in control, 24.47 months; P=0.034). (B) There was no significant survival difference between immunotherapy and control groups in stage IV gastric cancer patients (mean survival time in immunotherapy, 20.30 months; in control, 11.60 months; P=0.350).

Abbreviation: TNM, tumor-node-metastasis.

A multivariate analysis of age and sex of patients, tumor size and site, histological differentiation type, clinical stage, surgery, and immunotherapy using the Cox regression model to identify independent prognostic factors for advanced GC was performed. The result showed that immunotherapy (HR, 0.641; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.450–0.913; P<0.05), surgery (HR, 0.548; 95% CI, 0.403–0.745; P<0.05), and clinic stage (HR, 2.201; 95% CI, 1.605–3.020; P<0.05) were the independent prognostic factors (Table 2).

Adverse effects

There was no obvious serious adverse effect observed in 71 patients during immunotherapy, such as high fever, chills, or allergic reactions. Five patients presented with transient fever (not more than 38.5°C) after intravenous T lymphocytes. Two patients complained of tenesmus after intraperitoneal T lymphocytes and recovered without interventions.

Discussion

GC is a common form of cancer and one of the most frequent causes of cancer-related deaths in the world.¹⁷ Although efficacy of GC had been promoted by multiple disciplinary team (MDT) approach, many GC patients suffer from poor prognosis owing to relapse or metastasis, especially for advanced tumors.¹⁸ Conventional treatments, including surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, may induce a variety of adverse effects and impair the antitumor immunity, thus making tumor residue.¹⁹ It has been proposed that adoptive cellular immunotherapy can stimulate and restore the host antitumor immunity, which has the ability to recognize and kill tumor cells.^20–22 Several adoptive cellular immunotherapies have been used in the treatment of solid tumors with increased efficacy, particularly in malignancy with poor response to traditional therapies.^5,8,11,23

In this study, in vitro-activated tumor-specific T lymphocytes immunotherapy plus chemotherapy after surgery prolonged the median survival of advanced GC patients by 9.8 months compared with chemotherapy alone. There are a variety of factors determining the clinical outcome of immunotherapies for GC patients.^24,25 First, the immunogenicity of tumor antigens and effective presentation of antigens play an important role in antitumor immunity. It has been proposed that tumor lysate-loaded DCs can present tumor antigen to effective T cells immunity in humans and rodents.^26,27 For this consideration, we obtain autologous tumor samples during surgery, which was further prepared to tumor lysate. We then used prepared tumor lysate as tumor-specific antigen activating DCs. Second, the quantity and quality of immunocytes are crucial factors impacting the efficacy of immunotherapy.²⁸ We have set up an optimal cell culture system in our laboratory and can effectively expand T lymphocytes, which comprised 71.02% CD8⁺ T-cells and 34.62% natural killer T-cells. These cells have high immune activity and antitumor specificity.^29,30 Otherwise, we can incubate tumor samples at 60°C for 60 minutes to induce heat shock proteins, which act as the immunologic adjuvant in tumor antigen delivery and enhance proliferation and immunological activity of T lymphocytes.^31–33 Finally, a more accurate administration timing and approach can promote the efficacy of immunotherapy. There always exists an immunosuppressed status after surgery and chemotherapy, so residual tumor cells may escape immune surveillance and survive during this period. In this study, we administered T lymphocytes on days 12 and 14 after surgery or recovery interval among chemotherapies, which can correct such immunosuppressed status and restore antitumor immunity within a short period of time, killing residual tumor cells and inhibiting recurrent and metastatic diseases. Tumors can metastasize via peritoneal implantation and hematogenous spread, so we administrated T lymphocytes through the intravenous and intraperitoneal approaches, which may efficiently prevent local relapse and metastatic diseases.

Surgery can reduce tumor burden as much as possible, thus promoting survival, however, it also impaired anti-tumor immunity.³⁴ Treatment with immunocytes can correct immunosuppression status after surgery. Our results coincide with these findings; immunotherapy has been shown to provide survival benefits for patients who have undergone radical surgery. In patients with residual tumor burden after palliative surgery, immunotherapy can also kill and limit the development of tumor cells, thus improving the prognosis outcome. In this study, we found that there was no significant difference between immunotherapy and control groups of patients with stage IV GC. The underlying reason may be that the observational duration for patients with stage IV GC was too short to obtain a statistically significant difference.

Limitations

There are several limitations in this study. First, the patients were enrolled from a single center, which cannot be applied universally. A multicenter prospective study is required for confirming the general effects of immunotherapy. Second, some unknown potential factors influence random choice of treatment regimens and affect conclusion, which may be corrected partly through Cox model analysis. Otherwise, a randomized trial should be conducted to further evaluate the benefit of immunotherapy. Lastly, the number of cases also limits the quality of further evaluating the significance of immunotherapy in stage IV patients.

Conclusion

T lymphocytes immunotherapy plus chemotherapy after surgery benefited patients with advanced GC. However, there are several questions that need to be resolved in further studies. These include 1) how to regulate the phenotype and the number of expanded T-cells individually for different patients; 2) how to make T-cells survive longer after infusion; and 3) how to improve tumor microenvironment and systemic environment to promote efficacy of T lymphocytes. By this way, immunotherapy would be considered as an adjuvant treatment for GC.