Abstract
Background
Between 04 Mar 2002 to 21 Mar 2002, 31 cases of pneumonia were admitted at a military hospital in South India. Most of these cases were young recruits. The out break was investigated to ascertain the cause and suggest preventive measures.
Methods
Detailed epidemiological history was taken from all 31 cases and 100 controls. Case sheets, laboratory reports and chest radiographs were studied. Laboratory investigations included sputum examination by Gram stain and blood cultures on brain heart infusion broth. Cultures grown on liquid media were subcultured on solid media. The regimental centre was visited to note the living and environmental conditions.
Results
Epidemiological investigations revealed overcrowding in the regimental centre. The space per recruit was below recommended standards. 51.6% of recruits who contacted pneumonia were sleeping on double deckers as compared to 21% of healthy controls. Blood culture was positive for Streptococcus pneumoniae in 25.8% of the cases. Chest radiograph showed consolidation typical of lobar pneumonia in 67% of the cases.
Conclusion
The outbreak of pneumococcal pneumonia occurred due to overcrowding. Chilly weather conditions and stress were contributing factors.
Key Words: Military recruits, Outbreak, Overcrowding, Pneumococcal, Pneumonia
Introduction
In general population of developed countries, pneumococcal pneumonia is common in extremes of age. Annual incidence in young adults is estimated at 25 per 100,000 as compared to 280 per 100,000 in elderly individual [1]. Reliable data for developing countries are not available.
Between 04 Mar 2002 to 21 Mar 2002, 31 cases of pneumonia (mostly recruits) were admitted to a military hospital in South India. The outbreak was investigated by a team of specialists from Armed Forces Medical College Pune, Command Hospital(Air Force) Bangalore and Military Hospital Wellington.
Material and Methods
A detailed epidemiological history (including history of movements, camps, route marches, sleeping arrangements, etc) was taken from all 31 cases and 100 controls (25 randomly selected recruits from each of the 4 training companies who were not affected). Case sheets, lab reports and chest radiographs were studied. Besides routine haematological and biochemical tests, laboratory investigations included sputum examination by Gram Stain and blood culture. All 31 cases were subjected to blood cultures (blood was drawn prior to administration of antibiotics). 2-3 ml venous blood was inoculated into 30 ml brain-heart infusion broth and incubated at 37°C. The specimens were subcultured on to blood agar plates every 48 hours. Smears from the broth were made and stained with Gram's stain. All the cultures grown on liquid media at Military Hospital, Wellington were brought to Department of Microbiology, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune by the investigation team for further identification. All the samples were subcultured on blood agar plates and incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2. Confirmation for Str pneumoniae was done by morphology, cultural characteristics, catalase test, optochin sensitivity, bile solubility, inulin fermentation and animal pathogenicity in mice. The pneumococcal isolates were evaluated for antibiotic sensitivity by disc diffusion test. Further analysis by random amplified polymorphic DNA(RAPD) typing of the isolates was carried out. The investigation team also carried 500 ml of viral transport medium and sterile screw capped plastic containers. Throat washings of all admitted patients and some OPD patients with respiratory symptoms (n=40) were collected in 2 ml viral transport medium along with antibiotics in screw capped sterile vials and labelled. Serum samples of all patients admitted in the hospital were also collected for further serological studies. However, paired samples were not taken. The samples were sent to National Institute of Virology, Pune for detection of respiratory viruses namely paramyxo, orthomyxo and adeno viruses. Serum samples were also tested for cold agglutinins by double dilution method. Hospital records were studied for present and past trends of pneumonia.
The team visited the regimental training centre to elicit the strength, turnover, sickness rates and other relevant data. It visited the barracks and assessed the floor and cubic space available. Medical Inspection Room records were also reviewed for other respiratory group of diseases (possibly viral) besides pneumonia. Practitioners in the adjoining civil areas were interviewed. Meteorological data was noted.
Results
Clinical presentation : Most of the 31 cases suffered from preceding Upper respiratory infection (URI) (manifested by running nose, sore throat, hoarseness of voice and dry cough) ranging from few days to 2 weeks prior to admission. At the time of admission, most of the recruits had combinations of multiple signs and symptoms. 21 (67%) had moderate to high-grade fever, 18 (58%) had cough with expectoration and 17 (54.8%) had pain chest. 16 (51.6%) of the cases which went into septicaemia as manifested by high fever and/or marked hypotension, out of which 14 were put on dangerously ill list (DIL) and 2 on seriously ill list (SIL).
Radiographic findings: Radiologically, there was consolidation typical of pneumonia in 21 (67%) cases (sites of consolidation were-right upper lobe 1; right middle lobe 3; right lower lobe 7; left lower lobe 10). 6 patients had features suggestive of bronchopneumonia, while chest radiograph was normal in 4 cases.
Laboratory investigations: (a) Blood culture: Out of the 31 samples, 8 blood cultures showed Gram positive diplococci morphologically resembling Streptococcus pneumoniae in brain-heart infusion broth by Gram stain. On subculture of these samples on blood agar plates at Armed Forces Medical College, two could be recovered and were confirmed as Streptococcus pneumoniae by morphology, cultural characteristics, catalase test, optochin sensitivity, bile solubility, inulin fermentation and animal pathogenicity in mice. Both the pneumococcal isolates were found to be sensitive to penicillin, erythromycin, cefotaxime, chloramphenicol and tetracycline by disc diffusion tests. Analysis by RAPD typing of the isolates showed that they belonged to the same strain. (b) Sputum smears: All the sputum smears available were reviewed. Out of the available 26 smears, 11 showed Gram positive diplococci morphologically resembling Streptococcus pneumoniae as the predominant organism. (c) Haematological parameters: The blood smears were reviewed by the investigating team and showed polymorphonuclear leukocytosis in 15 out of the 31 patients ranging from 12,000 to 22,600/cumm. All blood culture positive patients had polymorphonuclear leukocytosis. Toxic granules could be demonstrated in only 2 patients. 5 patients showed normal counts despite having severe clinical manifestations. (d) Biochemical parameters: These were within normal limits. (e) Virological studies: All samples were negative for respiratory viruses namely paramyxo, orthomyxo and adeno viruses by culture, immunoflourescence and serology. (f) Cold agglutinins: All the serum samples were found to be negative for cold agglutinins (provisionally excluding mycoplasmal pneumonia).
Delay in seeking treatment : Average delay in seeking treatment for symptoms was 4.5 days. 8(24%) of the cases delayed treatment for more than a week because of fear of relegation.
Case management : Pending isolation of specific organisms, confirmation of aetiology and in view of the fact that a large proportion of patients (51.6%) presented with marked hypotension indicating septicaemia, all the cases were managed with broad-spectrum antibiotics either singly or in combination covering both gram positive and gram negative organisms (Cloxacillin, Cefotaxime, Gentamicin, Amikacin, Vancomycin and Ampicillin). All the patients responded to treatment and there was no mortality.
Place and person distribution
The regimental centre has 4 training companies. These, along with approximate strengths on 21 March 2002 are as follows:
(a) | 'A' Company | 635 | these two barracks were |
(b) | 'B' Company | 546 | adjacent |
(c) | 'C' Company | 583 | these two were located some |
(d) | 'D' Company | 628 | distance from above two companies (1 Km) |
In each company there are 10 platoons. Platoon strength was about 60 (recently raised from 30 due to shortage of instructors).
The bulk of the cases (23 of the 31), admitted for pneumonia between 04 and 21 Mar 2002 at military hospital occurred in ‘A’ Company (Table 1). Twenty-seven (87%) of the recruits affected were between 0 to 12 weeks of training. ‘A’ Company contributed the maximum number of cases and also had the least floor and air space per recruit.
Table 1.
Floor and air space per recruit company-wise and number of cases of pneumonia contributed by each individual company
Coy | Total barrack floor space (M2) | Strength | Floor area* per rect (m2) | Air space+ per rect (m3) | No of cases of pneumonia | % of total cases |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | 2185 | 635 | 3.44 | 10.49 | 23# | 74.2 |
B | 2185 | 546 | 4.002 | 12.19 | 5 | 16.1 |
C | 2452.6 | 583 | 4.21 | 12.82 | 2 | 6.5 |
D | 2452.6 | 628 | 3.91 | 11.90 | 1 | 3.2 |
Total | 9275.2 | 2392 | 3.88 | 11.82 | 31 | 100 |
Recommended floor space = 5 m2 per person, + Recommended air space = 18 m3 per person,
22 recruits.
Time distribution
All the cases in the present outbreak were admitted between 04 and 21 Mar 2002. The first case (from ‘A’ Company) was admitted on 04 Mar 2002. The second case (the company havildar major (CHM) of ‘A’ company who had come in contact with the first case) was admitted on 08 Mar 2002. Except for one case from ‘B’ company and one soldier (both gave history of close contact with recruits of ‘A’ company), all the cases admitted till 19 Mar 2002 were from ‘A’ company. After 19th March few cases were reported from other companies.
State of accommodation and sleeping arrangements
The total barrack space available for accommodating the four companies along with the strength and space available per recruit are given in Table 1. 16(51.6%) of the recruits who contacted pneumonia, gave history of sleeping in the double decker cots, or on the floor because of unavailability of adequate number of cots. As compared to this, 21% of the healthy controls gave history of sleeping in double deckers or on the floor. This difference was statistically significant (Table 2). Such arrangements due to overcrowding further compromised the available floor and air space facilitating spread of respiratory infections due to droplet infection. Moreover, there were no fans, being a non-fan station.
Table 2.
Proportion of cases of pneumonia giving history of sleeping on double deckers/floor as compared to controls without pneumonia
History of sleeping | Cases of pneumonia | Healthy controls | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Double deckers/floor | 16 (51.6%) | 21 (21%) | 37 (28.24%) |
Single cots | 15 (48.4%) | 79 (79%) | 94 (71.76%) |
Total | 31 (100%) | 100 (100%) | 131 (100%) |
Chi square (Yates corrected) = 9.48, df = 1, p = 0.002 (significant) Odd's ratio = 4.01 (cornfield 95% CL for OR = 1.58 < OR < 10.30)
Turnover and overall strength of the regimental centre
The strength of recruits of the training centre varied between 1463 in Jan 2001 to 1497 in Dec 2001. However, since Jan 2002 there was a sudden increase in new enrolments with 508 enrolments in Jan 2002, 249 in Feb 2002 and 349 in Mar 2002 (Table 3). Not only absolute number of recruits increased suddenly in the first quarter of the present year as compared to previous year but the monthly intake in the first three months of the present year was also very high. Whereas in the first quarter of previous year the total new enrolment for the quarter was 126, in the present year there were 1106 new enrolments - an increase of almost 10 times (Fig. 1).
Table 3.
Monthwise strength along with monthly new enrolments Jan 01 to 20 Mar 2002*
Months and year | Total recruit strength | New enrolments |
---|---|---|
Jan 2001 | 1463 | 108 |
Feb 2001 | 1427 | 02 |
Mar 2001 | 1095 | 16 |
Apr 2001 | 1239 | 260 |
May 2001 | 1233 | 42 |
Jun 2001 | 1211 | 259 |
Jul 2001 | 1436 | 237 |
Aug 2001 | 1619 | 192 |
Sep 2001 | 1462 | 189 |
Oct 2001 | 1470 | 30 |
Nov 2001 | 1636 | 178 |
Dec 2001 | 1497 | 38 |
Jan 2002 | 1993 | 508 |
Feb 2002 | 2114 | 249 |
Mar 2002 | 2392 | 349 |
The strength of recruits who have left in each month after completion of training has not been shown. Only strength in each month with new enrolments has been shown
Fig. 1.
Quarterly new enrolments Jan 01 to Mar 02 (upto mid Mar)
Meteorological conditions
The regimental centre is located at an altitude of about 1,800 metres. The maximum temperature was between 17°C to 24°C in the months Jan to Mar 2002 and the minimum between 7°C to 14°C.
Present and past incidence of respiratory group of diseases (other than pneumonia) among the recruits
Besides pneumonia, there was also increase in other respiratory diseases reporting to the OPD such as common cold, bronchitis and URTI in the month of March as compared to previous year (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2.
Cases of other respiratory illnesses among rects reporting to MI room (Jan-Mar 01-02)
Previous incidence of pneumonia among recruits
In the year 2001 there were 11 cases of pneumonia among the recruits from Jan to Dec with 2 cases occurring in March. During 2000 there were 30 cases with 6 cases in March (Figure 3). No bacteriological confirmation could be established in earlier years. The cases of pneumonia per 1000 recruits in the months of March 2000-2002 is shown in Figure 4. The number of cases in Mar 2002 is clearly in excess of normal expectations as compared to the preceding two years (Figure 4).
Fig. 3.
Pneumonia cases 2002-2002 (Mar)
Fig. 4.
Incidence of pneumonia among recruits in the month of Mar (2000-2002)
Disease rate in neighbouring civil population
There was no unusual incidence of pneumonia like illness among the civil population.
Control measures
Overcrowding was reduced in barracks, classrooms and dining halls. Contacts were segregated and administered either Erythromycin or Azithromycin for five days (Erythromycin 250 mg twice a day and Azithromycin 250 mg once a day). As Streptococcus pneumonia is found in the respiratory tract of healthy people [1], detection of carrier rates is of no practical value.
Discussion
Like many other microorganisms, Str pneumoniae colonizes the nasopharynx [1]. Appropriate culture yields pneumococci in 5-10% of healthy adults, which may rise to 40-60% in certain groups. An individual serotype persists usually 2-4 weeks, sometimes much longer [2]. Population based studies carried out in different parts of the world [3], show that the overall rate of invasive pneumococcal disease, is about 15 per 100,000 persons per year. In certain populations and ethnic groups [4, 5], the incidence may be increased 10 fold. It is a disease of continuing endemicity particularly in infancy and old age [6]. Day care centres are very likely to be places for spread of organisms in toddlers [7, 8, 9, 10]. In military medical literature, there are accounts of pneumococcal outbreaks. Hodges et al [11], reported an epidemic in an Army Training School during World War II, where under conditions of overcrowding and high turnover of recruits, there were 1,600 cases of pneumonia over a two and a half year period. More recently, between 4 Mar to 8 April 1999, an Epidemiologic Consultation team of the US Army conducted an investigation of pneumococcal pneumonia outbreak in a cohort of Ranger students at Fort Benning [12]. During the first five weeks of training, there were 29 cases of pneumonia. The outbreak was controlled by mass azithromycin treatment.
In a large percentage of cases with acute respiratory infections, the pathogens responsible for infection are not known [13]. In community acquired pneumonia, the causative organism is unknown in approximately 98% of those treated as outpatients and 50% to 60% of those treated as hospital inpatients [14, 15]. Studies of the bacterial causes of pneumonia have been marred by problems of contamination of sputum by nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal organisms [16]. As bronchoscopic and transtracheal aspirates are also at risk of contamination [17, 18], most investigators rely on percutaneous needle lung aspirates and blood culture for accurate diagnosis [19]. Blood cultures are positive in only 1 to 16% of patients, and their cost-effectiveness have been questioned [20, 21]. In this outbreak we could isolate the etiologic agent in blood culture in 25% of the cases in liquid media. However, only in 6.45% of the cases the organisms could be confirmed on solid media. Because of this limitation, the etiologic role of Streptococcus pneumonia in a patient who has pneumonia is strongly suggested by microscopic demonstration of large number of Gm +ve cocci in pairs and chains in sputum [1]. Streptococcus pneumoniae is associated with upto 70% of pneumonia cases in which a pathogen is isolated [22, 23]. Though the conditions for mycoplasmal pulmonary infection was present in the barracks, the findings of the present study support the view that pneumococcal disease still remains the predominant cause of community acquired pneumonia. The chest radiograph is fairly reliable with low inter-observer variability [24, 25, 26, 27]. Lobar consolidation, cavitation and large pleural effusions support a bacterial cause. Most lobar pneumonias are pneumococcal, whereas most pneumococcal pneumonias are not lobar [1] In the present outbreak 21 (67%) of the cases had lobar pneumonia.
The floor and air space available per recruit were below the recommendations in the Manual of Health for the Armed Forces, which recommend 5m2 of floor area and 18m3 of air space per person. In ‘A’ and ‘D’ company it was also below the norms recommended by WHO in emergency shelters, i.e., 4m2 per person [28]. Correlation exists between overcrowding and pneumonia incidence [13]. The recruits in the present outbreak were exposed to chilly conditions and were undergoing stress of training. It is not clear whether meteorological factors per se increase host susceptibility or whether crowding is a concomitant variable [13]. Graham et al [29], studied the relationship between stress and respiratory infection. Stress was related to incidence of respiratory infections even after adjustment for confounders. Stress may suppress immune function [30].
Viral infections predispose to pneumococcal infections [1, 11]. In this outbreak, rate of upper respiratory infections reporting was higher than previous figures. Though erythromycin/azithromycin prophylaxis was resorted to as one of the measures to control the outbreak, taking cue from an isolated reference [12], same is not mentioned in standard text [1, 6, 13]. This needs further evaluation. Vaccines have been recommended for prophylaxis [1, 3, 6]. However, because of differences in serotype prevalence, the vaccine may have lower efficacy in developing countries [6]. Research on prevalent serotypes in our population is needed. Meanwhile, overcrowding in military barracks should be avoided.
References
- 1.Musher DM. Steprococcus pneumoniae. In: Mandell GL, Bennett JE, Raphael D, editors. Mandell, Douglas and Bennett's Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases. 5th ed. Churchill; Livingstone: 2000. pp. 2128–2147. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ekdahl K, Ahlinder I, Hansson H. Duration of nasopharyngeal carriage of penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneuminiae: Experience from the South Swedish pneumococcal intervention project. Clin Infect Dis. 1997;25:1113–1117. doi: 10.1086/516103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Fedson DS, Musher DM, Eskola J. Pneumococcal vaccine. In: Plotkin SA, Orenstein WA, editors. Vaccines. 3rd ed. WB Saunders; Philadelphia: 1999. pp. 553–607. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Davidson M, Parkinson AJ, Bulkow LR. The epidemiology of invasive pneumococcal disease in Alaska, 1986–1990; ethnic differences and opportunities for prevention. Jour Infect Dis. 1994;170:368–376. doi: 10.1093/infdis/170.2.368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Torzillo P, Hanna J, Morey F. Invasive pneumococcal disease in Central Australia. Med Jour Aust. 1995;162:182–186. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1995.tb126016a.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.APHA . Pneumococcal Pneumonia. In: Chin J, editor. Control of Communicable Diseases Manual. 17th ed. American Public Health Association; Washington DC: 2000. pp. 387–390. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Henderson FW, Gilligan PH, Wait K, Goff DA. Nasopharyngeal carriage of antibiotic resistant pneumococcal by children in day care. J Infect Dis. 1988;157:256–263. doi: 10.1093/infdis/157.2.256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Rauch AM, O'Ryan M, Van R, Pickering LK. Invasive disease due to Streptococcus pneumoniae in a day care center. Am J Dis Child. 1990;144:923–927. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1990.02150320087033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Doyle MG, Morrow AL, Van R, Pisckering LK. Intermediate resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae to penicillin in day care centre. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1992;11:831–835. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199210000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Nuorti JP, Butler JC, Crutcher JM. An outbreak of multi-drug resistant pneumococcal pneumonia and bacteremia among unvaccinated nursing home residents. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:1861–1868. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199806253382601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hodges RG, Macleod CM. Epidemic pneumococcal pneumonia. Description of the epidemic. Am J Hyg. 1946;44:183–192. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a119088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Sanchez JL, Craig SC, Kolavic S, Hastings D. An outbreak of pneumococcal penumonia among military personnel at high risk: control by low dose post-exposure chemoprophylaxis. Mil Med. 2003;168(1):1–6. Jan. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Graham NMH. The epidemiology of acute respiratory infections. In: Nelson KE, Williams CM, Graham NMH, editors. Infectious Disease Epidemiology. Aspen Publishers Inc; Maryland: 2001. pp. 439–476. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bartlett JG, Breiman RF, Mandell G. Community acquired pneumonia in adults: guidelines for managment. Clin Infect Dis. 1998;26:811–838. doi: 10.1086/513953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Reimer LG, Caroll KC. Role of the microbiology laboratory in the diagnosis of lower respiratory tract infections. Clin Infect Dis. 1998;26:742–748. doi: 10.1086/514583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Barrett-Conner E. The nonvalue of sputum culture in the diagnosis of acute pneumonia. Am Rev Resp Dis. 1971;103:845–848. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1971.103.6.845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Davidson M, Tempest B, Palmer DL. Bacteriologic diagnosis of acute pneumonia-comparison of sputum, transtracheal aspirates and lung aspirates. JAMA. 1976;235:158–163. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Halperin SA, Suratt PM, Gwaltney JM., Jr Bacterial cultures of the lower respiratory tract in normal volunteers with and without experimental rhinovirus infection using plugged double catheter system. Am Rev Resp Dis. 1982;125:678–680. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1982.125.6.678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Silverman M, Stratton D, Diallo A. Diagnosis of acute bacterial pneumonia in Nigerian children. Value of needle aspirations of lung and counter current electrophoresis. Arch Dis Child. 1977;52:925–931. doi: 10.1136/adc.52.12.925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bothe R, van Furth R, van den Broeks PJ. A etiology of community-acquired pneumonia: A prospective study among adults requiring admission to hospital. Thorax. 1995;50:543–547. doi: 10.1136/thx.50.5.543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Chalasani NP, Valdecanas MAL, Gopal AK. Clinical utility of blood cultures in adult patients with community-acquired penumonia. Chest. 1995;108:932–936. doi: 10.1378/chest.108.4.932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.MacFarlane JT. Treatment of lower respiratory infection. Lancet. 1987;2:1446–1449. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(87)91140-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.MacFarlane JT, Finch RG, Ward MJ. Hospital study of adult community-acquired pneumonia. Lancet. 1982;2:255–258. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(82)90334-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Albaum MN, Hill LC, Murphy M. Interobserver reliability of the chest radiograph in community-acquired pneumonia. Chest. 1996;110:343–350. doi: 10.1378/chest.110.2.343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Gonzales R, Steiner JF, Sande MA. Antibiotic prescribing for adults with colds, upper respiratory tract infecitons and bronchitis by ambulatory care physicians. JAMA. 1997;278:901–904. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Hasley PB, Albaum MN, Li Y-H. Do pulmonary radiographic findings at presentations predict mortality in patients with community-acquired pneumonia? Ann Intern Med. 1996;156:2206–2212. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Scanlon GT, Unger JD. The radiology of bacterial and viral pneumonias. Radiol Clin North Am. 1973;11:317–338. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.WHO . Rapid Health Assessment Protocols for Emergencies. World Health Organization; Geneva: 1999. List of reference values for rapid health assessment in developing countries; p. 95. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Graham NMH, Douglas RM, Ryan P. Stress and acute respiratory infeciton. Am J Epidemiol. 1986;124:389–401. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kiecolt-Glaser JK, Glaser R. Psychological influences on immunity. Psychosomatics. 1986;27:621–624. doi: 10.1016/S0033-3182(86)72630-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]