Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2016 Jun 28;6:28499. doi: 10.1038/srep28499

Piezoresistive effect in p-type 3C-SiC at high temperatures characterized using Joule heating

Hoang-Phuong Phan 1,a, Toan Dinh 1, Takahiro Kozeki 2, Afzaal Qamar 1, Takahiro Namazu 2, Sima Dimitrijev 1, Nam-Trung Nguyen 1, Dzung Viet Dao 1,3
PMCID: PMC4923857  PMID: 27349378

Abstract

Cubic silicon carbide is a promising material for Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS) applications in harsh environ-ments and bioapplications thanks to its large band gap, chemical inertness, excellent corrosion tolerance and capability of growth on a Si substrate. This paper reports the piezoresistive effect of p-type single crystalline 3C-SiC characterized at high temperatures, using an in situ measurement method. The experimental results show that the highly doped p-type 3C-SiC possesses a relatively stable gauge factor of approximately 25 to 28 at temperatures varying from 300 K to 573 K. The in situ method proposed in this study also demonstrated that, the combination of the piezoresistive and thermoresistive effects can increase the gauge factor of p-type 3C-SiC to approximately 20% at 573 K. The increase in gauge factor based on the combination of these phenomena could enhance the sensitivity of SiC based MEMS mechanical sensors.

Sensors based on MEMS technologies, which can withstand harsh environments, have been extensively developed and investigated recently1,2. The use of these transducers could not only improve the efficiency of systems but also predict possible failures due to hostile conditions3. For instance, in pipeline systems, gas flow sensors, strain sensors, and pressure sensors are required to measure the pressure level, monitor pipeline cracks, as well as detect gas leakage4. Additionally, in industries involving fuel combustion such as aerospace and automotive systems, temperature and pressure sensors are vital devices in the feedback control to enhance the performance of engines5,6. Among various technologies utilized in mechanical sensors, the piezoresistive effect has several advantages, such as device miniaturization, low power consumption, and simple read out circuits7,8,9,10,11. The piezoresistance of silicon (Si) has been deployed in a large number of applications, including inertia12, pressure13, tactile14, and chemical/bio sensors15,16 owing to its large gauge factor, worldwide availability and mature fabrication technologies. However, Si is not a suitable material used in harsh environments because of its relatively low energy gap of 1.12 eV and its plastic deformation at high temperature17.

Recent studies have paid a great attention to silicon carbide (SiC), a wide energy gap material, which possesses several superior physical properties over Si for applications under hostile conditions18,19,20,21,22. The piezoresistive effect of SiC has been investigated to replace Si based counterparts for high temperature applications1,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32. However, one of the main obstacles for SiC material is its high cost compared to Si1,25,26. Researchers have aimed at growing SiC on large scale Si substrates to reduce the cost of SiC wafers as well as to ease the SiC MEMS devices fabrication processes. Among 200 poly types of crystalline SiC, 3C-SiC (or cubic SiC) is the only poly type that can be grown on a Si substrate33. The size of single crystalline 3C-SiC grown on Si substrates has been reported to be up to 150 mm34,35. In addition, the piezoresistance of p-type 3C-SiC grown on large scale Si wafers with a diameter of 150 mm has been reported recently, showing a gauge factor of approximately 30, which is promising for mechanical sensors36,37. However, to date, the piezoresistive effect of p-type 3C-SiC at high temperatures has not been reported. One of the main reasons that makes the characterization of the electrical properties of 3C-SiC at high temperature challenging, is the large current leakage between the SiC and Si junction at temperature above 150 °C38,39.

This paper aims to characterize the piezoresistive effect of highly doped p-type 3C-SiC at high temperatures utilizing a new measurement method in which 3C-SiC piezoresistors are heated using the Joule heating effect. We also report on the combination of the piezoresistive and themoresistive effects in 3C-SiC at high temperatures (hereinafter the combination phenomenon). A mathematical model was also proposed to extract the true gauge factor of p-type 3C-SiC from the combination of these two effects. The measurement technique proposed in this study can also be used to characterize the piezoresistive effect in other semiconductors at high temperatures, and to tune their gauge factor based on the combination phenomenon.

Results and Discussion

Principle of the in situ measurement method

Figure 1(a) shows the fabricated SiC resistors on a Si strip. A SiC bridge with Al electrodes deposited and patterned on its top surface was released from the Si substrate, while its two ends were fixed to the substrate by non-released pads with a surface area of 100 μm  ×  300 μm. A SiC resistor with a dimension of 08 μm × 12 μm × 300 nm is located at the center of the released bridge.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

(a) SEM images of SiC resistors released from the Si substrate using a MEMS photolithography process; (b) The IV curve of a SiC resistor measured at low applied voltage to avoid the effect of Joule heating; (c) Measurement of the current leakage through the SiC/Si junction when the SiC/Si strip was uniformly heated at high temperatures up to 200 °C.

The linear current-voltage curve of the resistor indicates that a good Ohmic contact was formed between Al and SiC, Fig. 1(b). The current leak through the SiC/Si heterojunction was found to be negligible at room temperature. The fabricated sample was then heated using a hot plate up to 200 °C. The experimental data showed that, at temperature above 100 °C the leakage current becomes significant, reaching above 10% of the current of the SiC resistor. As a consequence, the Si substrate may contribute to the measurement of the piezoresistive effect in SiC at high temperature if the whole SiC/Si strip is heated. To avoid the influence of the Si layer on the measurement of the piezoresistive effect in SiC at high temperature, there is a need to lower the temperature of the Si when heating the SiC piezoresistors. We propose the following technique to characterize the piezoresistance of the p-type 3C-SiC at elevated temperatures.

As shown in Fig. 2, initially a high electrical power was supplied to the released SiC resistor to increase its temperature using the Joule heating effect. Because the Al/SiC bridge was released, the thermal conductivity through the substrate was significantly reduced. Therefore, the temperature of the Si layer remained relatively low, preventing a large leakage current occurring at high temperatures. Once the temperature of the SiC resistors reached the steady state, an external mechanical strain was then applied. Because the SiC was heated by applying an electrical power, the change in its resistance due to the piezoresistance will in turn change the applied power, and consequently change the resistance of SiC due to the thermoresistive effect. Thus, both the piezoresistive and thermoresistive effects will contribute to the modification in the electrical conductance of SiC under stress. From the change in SiC resistance due to this combined effect, the gauge factor of p-type 3C-SiC at high temperatures can be obtained. The following sections present: (i) the bending method used to characterize the piezoresistive effect; (ii) the thermoresistive effect used to monitor the temperature of the heated SiC resistor; (iii) the Joule heating effect for locally increasing the temperature of SiC; and (iv) separation of the piezoresistive effect from the combination phenomenon.

Figure 2. The proposed in situ measurement.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

(a) A high electrical power was supplied to locally raise the temperature of a released SiC resistor; (b) Mechanical strain was induced into the SiC resistor, while its resistance change was also measured.

The piezoresistive effect of 3C-SiC at room temperature

The piezoresistive effect of the released 3C-SiC was initially investigated at room temperature. The strain was induced into the SiC frame by employing the bending beam method. One end of the Si beam was fixed using a metal clamp, while the free end was deflected. The strain applied to the top surface of Si layer is:

graphic file with name srep28499-m1.jpg

where F is the applied force; and E, l, w and t are the Young’s modulus, length, width, and thickness the Si cantilever, respectively. Since the released SiC bridges were fixed to the Si substrate at their two ends, we expected that the strain would be induced into the SiC resistors following the bending of the Si cantilever40,41. Finite element analysis (FEA) was then carried out using COMSOL Multiphysics™, Fig. 3(a). The simulation results indicated that the strain induced into SiC resistors was almost the same as that of the Si substrate with a difference of below 5%. Therefore, the strain applied to the fabricated SiC resistor can be approximated using equation (1).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

(a) Simulation result of the strain applied to the SiC resistor when bending the Si cantilever (inset: a comparison between the strain induced into the SiC resistor (dart line) and that of the top surface of the Si substrate (solid line)); (b) The relationship between the relative resistance change of the p-type 3C-SiC resistor and the applied strain at room temperature. The applied current of the multimeter was set at 500 nA, at which the Joule heating effect is considered to be negligible.

The resistance change of SiC resistors under mechanical strain was monitored using a resistance-meter (Agilent Multimeter™). At a small applying current of 500 nA from the multimeter, the Joule heating effect in 3C-SiC resistor is considered to be negligible. Under mechanical strains varying from 00 to 350 ppm, the relative resistance change (ΔR/R) of the p-type 3C-SiC shows a linear relationship with the applied strain, Fig. 3(b). Consequently, the gauge factor of p-type 3C-SiC was calculated to be 28 at room temperature (25 °C), using the equation: GF = (ΔR/R)/ε.

The gauge factor of p-type 3C-SiC has a positive value and is at least 15 times larger than that of metals. The piezoresistive effect in p-type 3C-SiC can be qualitatively explained due to the redistribution of holes in the top valance bands. Under a mechanical strain, these bands (e.g. light holes and heavy holes) will split and warp, causing holes to move from higher energy to lower energy levels. The re-population of holes will lead to the change of their effective mass and thus their mobility, resulting in a change in SiC resistance (or conductance).

The thermoresistive effect of 3C-SiC

Next, we characterized the thermoresistive effect of 3C-SiC to monitor the temperature of the 3C-SiC elements under Joule heating. The released SiC resistors were detached from the Si substrate using the Focused Ion Beam (FIB)42, as illustrated in Fig. 4 inset. Firstly, a probe was attached to the SiC bridge. Next, two ends of the released SiC resistors were diced using FIB to disconnect them from the Si substrate. Subsequently, the SiC resistors were transferred onto a glass substrate with aluminum contacts already deposited on it. Finally, tungsten was deposited onto the transferred SiC resistors to enhance the electrical contact (ESI). Because FIB was used to cut the SiC bridge on the Al area, ion bombardment was expected to have no significant impact on the SiC resistor. This assumption was confirmed as the resistance of the SiC elements before and after the FIB process showed no difference.

Figure 4. The thermoresistive effect in p-type 3C-SiC transferred on glass substrate.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

The thermoresistive effect was then investigated by increasing the temperature of the transferred SiC elements using a high temperature oven. It can be seen from Fig. 4 that when raising the temperature from 300 K to 600 K, the resistance of the p-type 3C-SiC decreased by approximately 50%, indicating the negative temperature coefficient of resistance (TCR) in p-type 3C-SiC. This decrease in SiC resistance is due to the thermally activated carrier concentration43. From the relationship between the change of SiC resistance and its temperature, the temperature of the SiC element under the Joule heating effect can be estimated.

Joule heating in released SiC structures

The Joule heating effect was then employed to locally raise the temperatures of the SiC resistors. The physical model of the Joule heating effect in our released SiC resistor is established based on the model of suspended beam heaters, which have been extensively investigated in gas sensors44,45. Accordingly, the heating power supplied to SiC resistor is Psup = V ×I, where V is the voltage drop across the SiC resistor and I is the applied current. The heat losses in the SiC bridges are caused by thermal conduction through the released beam to the anchor parts, thermal convection through the surrounding air, and thermal radiation. The heat loss through thermal conduction of the beam can be estimated as44: Pcd ∝ AcrkcdΔT where Acr is the cross sectional area of the SiC bridges; kcd is the heat conductivity of SiC; and ΔT is the temperature difference between the bridge center and beam anchor, respectively. The heat loss through thermal convection to the surrounding air can be approximated as44: Pcv ∝ AsfkcvΔT, where Asf is the surface area of the SiC bridges, and kcv is the heat transfer coefficient. Additionally, the heat loss due to thermal radiation is46: Inline graphic, where λ is the Stefan–Boltzmann constant, while T∞ and T0 are the temperature of the SiC bridge and the surrounding air, respectively. At the steady state, the Joule heating effect reaches equilibrium, following the rule that the supplied power is balanced by the heat loss: Psup = V∞ × I∞ = Pcd +Pcv + Prad. Here, the subscript ∞ indicates the steady state.

From the above mentioned theoretical analysis, we simulated the Joule heating effect using COMSOL Multiphysics™. The temperature of the surrounding air was set to be 25 °C, while the silicon substrate was considered as the heat sink. The simulation results show that when the released SiC bridge is heated by the Joule heating effect, high temperatures mainly distributed at the center part of Al/SiC bridge and temperature gradually decreases from the center part to the anchor part. The temperature at the vicinity of the SiC/Si junction remains below 50 °C even when the temperature of the SiC resistor reaches above 300 °C, Fig. 5(a).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

(a) Simulation of the Joule heating effect on released SiC resistor using Comsol Multiphysics; (b) The relationship between the resistance of p-type 3C-SiC resistor and the heating power at the steady state, using the current mode and voltage mode. The decrease in SiC resistance at high applied power indicates that the Joule heating effect has significantly raised the temperature of SiC resistance; (c) Temperature at SiC resistor calibrated from Fig. 4. The non-linearity between the applied power and temperature is considered due to thermal radiation in nano structures at high temperatures46.

We conducted the Joule heating effect experiment on the released SiC resistors employing two different modes: constant current and constant voltage. Both modes showed the same result that, when the heating power was increased, the resistance of SiC decreased. Figure 5(b) presents the experimental results of the relationship between the supplied power and the SiC resistance at the steady state. The decrease in the resistance of SiC with increasing heating power obeys the thermoresistive effect presented in the previous section where increasing the temperature of the SiC element could increase its carrier concentration, thus enhance its electrical conductance. Additionally, by correlating the results in Figs 5(b) and 4, it is possible to develop the relationship between the temperature of the SiC resistor when a certain power is applied, as shown in Fig. 5(c). We also measured the leakage current through the SiC/Si junction when a large power was applied, showing that the leakage current was negligible in comparison to the current flowing through the SiC resistor (ESI). This is due to the fact that temperature rises locally at the SiC resistor while the temperature at the SiC/Si junction remains relatively low. This result is also in solid agreement with the simulation result. Due to the low heat loss caused by thermal conductance of the thin bridge, high temperatures mainly concentrated at the SiC resistor. Additionally, the temperature decreased significantly along the released bridge towards the fixed electrode pads. Therefore, the Joule heating effect can elevate the temperature of the SiC resistors and prevent the current leaking through the substrate. This result allowed us to characterize the piezoresistive effect in 3C-SiC on Si substrate in situ, which is presented as follows.

Combination of the piezo- and thermo-resistive effects in locally heated 3C-SiC

Once the temperature of the SiC resistors had reached the steady state (T∞) in the Joule heating experiment, the bending method was employed to investigate the piezoresistance in SiC at high temperatures.

Experimental results showed that, at a low applied power (below 6 μW) where the Joule heating effect was insignificant, the relative resistance changes of SiC resistor under strain in both constant current and constant voltage modes were almost the same. The gauge factor of p-type 3C-SiC was calculated to be approximately 28, which is the same as the result measured using the multimeter. However, under a high applied heating power (e.g. above 340 μW), the relative resistance changes of SiC resistor under constant applied current and constant applied voltage have different values. Figure 6 shows that under the same mechanical load and heating power, the change of SiC resistance in constant voltage mode is larger than that of the constant current mode. At an applied power of 340 μW which corresponds to a temperature of approximately 573 K, the gauge factor at constant voltage mode was calculated to be GFV = 32.5, while at constant current mode this value was calculated to be GFI = 20.5. This phenomenon was considered to be due to the combination of piezoresistance and thermoresistance in the heated SiC element under strain, as illustrated in Fig. 7(a).

Figure 6. Characterization of the piezoresistive effect at high temperature using the Joule heating effect.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

The relative resistance change at (a) small applied power (b) high applied power. The red line shows the output of the constant current mode, while the blue line illustrates the output of the constant voltage mode.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

(a) The combination of thermoresistance and piezoresistance in the heated SiC resistors under strain; (b) The calculation method of the true gauge factor.

The combination phenomenon can be qualitatively explained as follows. Initially, under the Joule heating effect which raises the temperature of the SiC element (T), the resistance of SiC decreases to R0 at steady state due to the thermoresistance. Next, when temperature is maintained at the steady state (T), applying the tensile strain will cause the resistance to increase to R* due to the piezoresistance. Furthermore, this increase in the resistance will change the heating power supplied to the SiC element. In the case of the constant current mode, the heating power will increase as resistance increases (PI = RI2), while for constant voltage mode, the heating power will decrease (PV = V2/R), Fig. 7(a). The change of heating power in turn results in a change of resistance of the SiC piezoresistors following the thermoresistive effect. Consequently, at the steady state, the resistance of SiC under constant current mode will decrease from R* to R1, while the resistance under constant voltage mode will increase from R* to R2 due to the negative temperature coefficient of resistance as shown in Fig. 6(b).

Based on the combination phenomenon and the observed gauge factor at constant current and constant voltage modes, we propose a method to extract the piezoresistive effect from the influence of the thermoresistive effect at high temperature. It can be assumed from the diagram in Fig. 7 that when a mechanical strain is applied, if the power could be maintained constantly at P* = P0, the temperature of SiC would be then kept constantly, and the resistance of SiC would also maintain its value of R* at the steady state. Therefore, the true gauge factor of the piezoresistive effect at temperature T, should be within the gauge factors of GFI and GFV since the combination of thermoresistance and piezoresistance will enhance the gauge factor of SiC at the constant voltage mode; conversely the combination phenomenon reduces the gauge factor at the constant current mode.

As shown in Fig. 5(b), the resistance change shows a non-linear relationship with the applied power varying from 6 to 340 μW. However, this relationship can be linearized within a smaller interval of powers by applying the Taylor series expansion to a monotonically decreasing function. As such, at each applied power in the Joule heating experiment, we measured the resistance change with the heating powers varying by ±5%. The resistance change showed a good linear relationship with the power applied in this small range, with a linear regression of 99%. Therefore, in the combination phenomenon, the heating power and resistance change can exhibit a linear relationship as the change of resistance at the steady state was relatively small (below 0.6%) resulting in a small change of heating power (below 0.6%), Fig. 7(b). A detailed explanation of the linear approximation of the relationship between the heating powers and resistances is presented in the ESI. Using this linear approximation, the following equation can be established:

graphic file with name srep28499-m3.jpg

where P* is the heating power at the steady state before applying strain (P* = P0 = V2/R0 = I2R0); and PI and PV are the heating power at the steady state after applying strain under constant current mode, and constant voltage mode, respectively. Given that δR be the relative resistance change before and after applying strain, we have: δRI = (RI − R0)/R0, δRV = (RV − R0)/R0, and δR* = (R* − R0)/R0. Equation (2) can be written as follows:

graphic file with name srep28499-m4.jpg

Additionally, the power differences are:

graphic file with name srep28499-m5.jpg

Therefore, equation (3) and equation (4) result in:

graphic file with name srep28499-m6.jpg

Consequently, the true relative resistance change due to the piezoresistive effect can be estimated as:

graphic file with name srep28499-m7.jpg

Note that as the gauge factor is the ratio of the relative resistance change to the applied strain (GF = δR/ε), the true gauge factor of the piezoresistive effect can be calculated based on the obtained gauge factor at the constant current and voltage modes:

graphic file with name srep28499-m8.jpg

The bending experiment was also performed at different applied powers varying from 6 μW to 340 μW, corresponding to a temperature range of 298 K to 570 K, Fig. 5(c). Additionally, using equation (7), the gauge factors of p-type 3C-SiC at different temperatures were calculated and plotted in Fig. 8. Evidently, with temperature varying from 298 K to 573 K, the gauge factor of p-type 3C-SiC was relatively stable with a smaller deviation of below 10%. This result is understandable due to the fact that the p-type 3C-SiC was relatively highly doped, making its piezoresistive effect more stable at high temperatures. The results also indicate that p-type 3C-SiC is a good candidate for applications operated at high temperatures where Si cannot be used. Additionally, the gauge factor of constant applied voltage mode was approximately 20% larger than that of the true gauge factor, indicating that by employing the piezoresistance and thermoresistance, it is possible to enhance the sensitivity of SiC based mechanical devices.

Figure 8. Calculated gauge factor of SiC at different heating temperatures.

Figure 8

Open in a new tab

In conclusion, this work reports the piezoresistive effect in p-type 3C-SiC at high temperatures of up to 573 K, characterized using an in situ measurement method. With a gauge factor of above 25 at 573 K, as well as a small deviation compared to the gauge factor at room temperature, highly doped p-type 3C-SiC is a promising poly type for mechanical sensing applications used in harsh environments. We also report a physical phenomenon regarding the combination of the thermoresistive effect and the piezoresistive effect on a locally heated SiC element under mechanical strain. A physical model was also proposed to analyze this phenomenon and a calculation method to obtain the gauge factor of 3C-SiC at high temperatures was also presented. These models and method can be utilized for in situ characterizing of the piezoresistive effect in other semiconductor materials grown on a conductive material, as well as in tuning the gauge factor of these materials.

Methods

Growth of p-type single crystalline 3C-SiC

Cubic SiC films were grown on a 150 mm Si(100) wafer by using a hot-wall low pressure chemical vapor deposition (LPCVD) reactor at 1000 °C34,35. The alternating supply epitaxy approach was used to achieve single crystalline SiC film deposition with silane (SiH4) and propylene (C3H6) as precursors. Trimethylaluminum [(CH3)3Al, TMAl] was employed as p-type dopant to in situ dope the SiC wafer. The quality of the grown SiC on Si film is presented in the ESI.

Fabrication of the released SiC resistors

After the SiC on Si wafers were grow, SiC resistors with dimensions of approximately 12 μm × 8 μm were patterned using a conventional MEMS photolithography process36. Silicon carbide on Si wafer was then diced into cantilevers with dimensions of 60 mm × 7 mm for the bending experiment. Finally, SiC resistors and Aluminum electrodes (SiC bridges with dimensions of 200 μm × 8 μm) were released from the Si substrate by under-etching the Si substrate using XeF2 gas. Additionally, all p-type 3C-SiC resistors used in this study were aligned in longitudinal [110] direction in order to obtain a large gauge factor. A detailed description of the fabrication can be found in the Electronic Supplementary Information (ESI).

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Phan, H.-P. et al. Piezoresistive effect in p-type 3C-SiC at high temperatures characterized using Joule heating. Sci. Rep. 6, 28499; doi: 10.1038/srep28499 (2016).

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information
srep28499-s1.pdf (343.8KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

This work was partially funded by the linkage grant (LP150100153) from the Australian Research Council (ARC). This work was performed in part at the Queensland node of the Australian National Fabrication Facility, a company established under the National Collaborative Research Infrastructure Strategy to provide nano and micro-fabrication facilities for Australia’s researchers.

Footnotes

Author Contributions H.-P.P. and T.D. fabricated the released SiC resistors. T.K. and T.N. transferred SiC on to a glass substrate. H.-P.P., T.D. and A.Q. conducted the experiments. H.-P.P., S.D., D.V.D. and N.-T.N. conceived the experiments and analyzed the results. D.V.D. and N.-T.N. planed and supervised the project. All authors participated in the discussion of the results and the writing of the manuscript.

References

  1. Phan H.-P., Dao D. V., Nakamura K., Dimitrijev S. & Nguyen N.-T. The piezoresistive effect of SiC for MEMS sensors at high temperatures: A review. J. Microelectromech. Syst. 24(6), 1663–1677 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  2. Wright N. G., Horsfall A. B. & Vassilevski K. Prospects for SiC electronics and sensors. Materials Today 11(1), 16–21 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  3. Senesky D. G., Jamshidi B., Cheng K. B. & Pisano A. P. Harsh environment silicon carbide sensors for health and performance monitoring of aerospace systems: A review. IEEE Sensors J. 9(11), 1472–1478 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  4. Nguyen S. D. et al. MEMS capacitive flow sensor for natural gas pipelines. Sens. Actuators A. 231, 28–34 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  5. Werner M. et al. High-temperature sensors based on SiC and diamond technology. Sensors Update 5, 141–190 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  6. Willander M., Friesel M., Wahab Q. U. & Straumal B. Silicon carbide and diamond for high temperature device applications. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 17(1), 1–25 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  7. Zhang C., Sarkar A. D. & Zhang R. Q. Strain induced band dispersion engineering in Si nanosheets J. Phys. Chem. C 115(48), 23682–23687 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  8. Barlian A. A., Park W. T., Mallon J. R. Jr., Rastegar A. J. & Pruitt B. L. Review: semiconductor piezoresistance for microsystems. Proc. IEEE 97(3), 513–552 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Rowe A. C. H. Piezoresistance in silicon and its nanostructures. Mater. Res. Soc. 29(6), 731–744 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  10. Wong J. H., Wu B. R. & Lin M. F. Strain effect on the electronic properties of single layer and bilayer graphene. J. Phys. Chem. C 116(14), 8271–8277 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  11. Littlejohn S., Nogaret A., Prentice G. M. & Pantos G. D. Pressure sensing and electronic amplification with functionalized graphite-silicone composite. Adv. Funct. Mater. 23(43), 5398–5402 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  12. Doll J. C. & Pruitt B. L. Piezoresistor design and applications, (Springer) (2013). [Google Scholar]
  13. Nguyen M. D., Phan H. P., Matsumoto K. & Shimoyama I. A sensitive liquid-cantilever diaphragm for pressure sensor. 26th IEEE MEMS 617–620 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  14. Kim J. et al. Stretchable silicon nanoribbon electronics for skin prosthesis. Nature Comm. 5, 5147 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Li M., Tang H. X. & Roukes M. L. Ultra-sensitive NEMS-based cantilevers for sensing, scanned probe and very high-frequency applications. Nature Nanotech. 2(2), 114–120 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Nguyen T.-V. et al. Viscosity measurement based on the tapping-induced free vibration of sessile droplets using MEMS-based piezoresistive cantilevers. Lab Chip. 15, 3670–3676 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Sarro P. M. Silicon carbide as a new MEMS technology. Sensor. Actuators A. 82, 210–218 (2000). [Google Scholar]
  18. Maboudian R., Carraro C., Senesky D. G. & Roper C. S. ‘Advances in silicon carbide science and technology at the micro-and nanoscales. J. Vacuum Sci. Technol. A 31(5), 050805 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  19. Zetterling C. M. Integrated circuits in silicon carbide for high-temperature applications. MRS Bulletin 40(05), 431–438 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  20. Lu X., Lee J. Y. & Lin Q. High-frequency and high-quality silicon carbide optomechanical microresonators. Scientific Reports 5, 17005 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Zhuang H. et al. Electrochemical properties and applications of nanocrystalline, microcrystalline and epitaxial cubic silicon carbide films. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7(20), 10886–10895 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Wang Z. H., Lee J. S. & Feng P. X. L. Spatial mapping of multimode Brownian motions in high frequency silicon carbide (SiC) microdisk resonators. Nature Comm. 5, 5158 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Shor J. S., Goldstein D. & Kurtz A. D. Characterization of n-Type β-Sic as a piezoresistor. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 40(6), 1093–1099 (1993). [Google Scholar]
  24. Yasui K., Miura H., Takata M. & Akadane T. SiCOI structure fabricated by catalytic chemical vapor deposition. Thin Solid Film 516, 644–647 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  25. Wu C. H., Zorman C. A. & Mehregany M. Fabrication and testing of bulk micromachined silicon carbide piezoresistive pressure sensors for high temperature applications. IEEE Sensors J. 6(2), 316–324 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  26. Eickhoff M. et al. Influence of crystal quality on the electronic properties of n-type 3C-SiC grown by low temperature low pressure chemical vapor deposition. J. Appl. Phys. 95, 7908 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  27. Okojie R. S., Ned A. A., Kurtz A. D. & Carr W. N. Characterization of highly doped n- and p-type 6H-SiC piezoresistors. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 45(4), 785–790 (1998). [Google Scholar]
  28. Toriyama T. Piezoresistance consideration on n-type 6H SiC for MEMS-based piezoresistance sensors. J. Micromech. Microeng. 14, 1445–1448 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  29. Shao R., Zheng K., Zhang Y., Li Y. & Zhang Z. The piezoresistive effect behaviors of ultra-strained SiC nanowires. Appl. Phys. Lett. 101, 233109 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  30. Bi J. et al. Highly sensitive piezoresistance behaviors of n-type 3C-SiC nanowires. J. Mater. Chem. C 1, 4514 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  31. Gao F., Zheng J., Wang M., Wei G. & Yang W. Piezoresistance behaviors of p-type 6H-SiC nanowires. Chem. Commun. 47, 11993–11995 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Okojie R. S., Lukco D., Nguyen V. & Savrun E. 6H-SiC piezoresistive pressure sensors at 800°C with observed sensitivity recovery. IEEE Electron Dev. Lett. 36(2), 174–176 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  33. Phan H.-P. et al. Orientation dependence of the pseudo-Hall effect in p-type 3C–SiC four-terminal devices under mechanical stress. RSC Advances 5(69), 56377–56381 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  34. Wang L. et al. Demonstration of p-type 3C-SiC grown on 150 mm Si (100) substrates by atomic-layer epitaxy at 1000 °C. J. Crystal Growth 329(1), 67–70 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  35. Wang L. et al. Kinetic surface roughening and wafer bow control in heteroepitaxial growth of 3C-SiC on Si (111) substrates. Scientific reports 5, 15423 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Phan H.-P. et al. Piezoresistive effect of p-type single crystalline 3C-SiC thin film. Electron. Dev. Lett. 35(3), 399–401 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  37. Phan H.-P. et al. Thickness dependence of the piezoresistive effect in p-Type single crystalline 3C-SiC nanothin films. J. Mater. Chem. C 3, 1172–1176 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  38. Dezauzier C. et al. Electrical characterization of SiC for high temperature thermal-sensor applications. Sensor Actuatuator A. 46(1), 71 (1995). [Google Scholar]
  39. Vinod K. N. et al. Fabrication of low defect density 3C-SiC on SiO2 structures using wafer bonding techniques. J. Electron. Mater. 27(3), L17–L20 (1998). [Google Scholar]
  40. He R. & Yang P. Giant piezoresistance effect in silicon nanowires. Nat. Nanotech. 1(1), 42–46 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Milne J. S. et al. Giant piezoresistance effects in silicon nanowires and microwires. Phys. Rev. Letts. 105(22), 226802 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Phan H.-P. et al. Piezoresistive effect of p-type silicon nanowires fabricated by a top-down process using FIB implantation and wet etching. RSC Adv. 5, 82121–82126 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  43. Dinh T. et al. Charge transport and activation energy of amorphous silicon carbide thin film on quartz at elevated temperature. Appl. Phys. Express 8(6), 061303 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  44. Zhou Q. et al. Fast response integrated MEMS microheaters for ultra low power gas detection. Sens. Actuators A. 223, 67–75 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  45. Baranov A., Spirjakin D., Akbari S. & Somov A. Optimization of power consumption for gas sensor nodes: A survey. Sens Actuators A. 233, 279–289 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  46. Chiriac H. & Astefanoaei I. A model of the DC Joule heating in amorphous wires. Physica Status Solidi (a) 153(1), 183–189 (1996). [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information
srep28499-s1.pdf (343.8KB, pdf)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES