Abstract
Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a multi drug resistant organism responsible for severe outbreaks of life threatening infections in hospitals which are difficult to treat They are spread by nasal carriage among the hospitalised patients, staff and visitors. Mannitol cloxacillin salt agar (MCSA) is a single tube method to identify MRSA. However, tubes showing growth and change in colour on biochemical characterisation often do not prove to be MRSA. In this study we have combined two strategies for the rapid identification and isolation of MRSA by culture in MCSA and multiplex PCR for mecA and femB genes. Anterior nasal swabs obtained from nursing staff and patients admitted to a large referral hospital, were inoculated into MCSA. Of the 100 tubes inoculated, 8 tubes showed change in colour and growth. On conventional testing 4 were MRSA, 3 were methicillin sensitive S aureus (MSSA) and 1 was Methicillin Sensitive Coagulase Negative S aureus (MSCNS). Genotyping by multiplex PCR revealed 5 MRSA, 2 MSSA and 1 MRCNS. The Multiplex PCR technique to rapidly identify presence of mecA and femB genes showed presence of both mecA and femB bands in all MRSA. The methicillin sensitive organisms showed absence of mecA gene while coagulase negative organisms showed absence of the fern B gene. Combining MSCA with multiplex PCR for mec A and fem B genes made the test both rapid and specific. Use of this strategy would enable rapid screening of nasal carriers and early implementation of hospital infection control measures.
KEY WORDS: Mannitol cloxacillin salt agar, Methicillin Resistant S aureus, Methicillin Sensitive Coagulase Negative S aureus, Methicillin Sensitive S aureus
Introduction
MRSA cause life-threatening infections, but they are no more pathogenic than methicillin-sensitive strains. Difficulties occur because of incorrect or missed identification of MRSA, and hence inappropriate or ineffective treatment of infections. However, new methods of detection and new agents for treatment are being developed for MRSA [1].
MRSA was initially detected in Europe in the 1960s, soon after the introduction of methicillin. Naturally-resistant strains were isolated before the use of methicillin or related agents. After a decline in the 1970s, new epidemic strains that differed from the original MRSAs emerged in Europe and USA and have now reached global proportions. Most strains are highly resistant to antibiotics and are only sensitive to vancomycin or teicoplanin. MRSA with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin have also emerged [2]. On the basis of evidence from countries where MRSA is not a problem, it has been suggested that early detection, effective infection control measures, and rational antibiotic use will limit the transmission of these organisms; however, spread is still increasing in many countries [3].
In order to avoid sudden out breaks caused by MRSA, regular screening of patients, hospital staff and newly transferred-in patients from other hospitals needs to be carried out. The conventional microbiological techniques lack the sensitivity, accuracy and rapidity needed to correctly identify and prevent a probable out break caused by MRSA. MCSA is a single tube method commonly used to identify MRSA [4]. Coagulase positive Staphylococci ferment mannitol and are able to grow in the presence of high salt concentrations. Addition of cloxacillin makes it selective for MRSA. However, tubes showing growth and change in colour on biochemical characterisation often do not prove to be MRSA. MRSA are characterised by the presence of mec A and fern B genes which can be detected by a multiplex PCR [5]. In this study we have combined the two methods, culture in MCSA for the rapid identification and isolation of MRSA and multiplex-PCR. This has been used to rapidly identify the carriage of MRSA in hospitalised patients.
Material and Methods
100 anterior nasal swabs were collected from patients hospitalised for more than 2 weeks and nursing staff at a large referral hospital in September 1999. Informed consent was obtained prior to sample collection. The swabs were directly inoculated at bed side into tubes containing 10 ml of MCSA (1%), Nacl (10%), Bactopeptone (1%), Beef extract (0.1%), agar (0.8%) and cloxacillin (6 μg/ml). Phenol Red pH indicator, pH (7.4) [4]. Tubes were incubated for 24 hours at room temperature. Growth in the tubes was noted. All the isolates which were Gram positive cocci (GPC) in clusters were tested for catalase, slide coagulase and tube coagulase test by conventional methods. The colonies were subjected to slide coagulase test, tube coagulase test and antimicrobial susceptibility (ABST) by the comparative Stokes method. Sensitivity testing to methicillin was carried out using a disc diffusion technique. Known control strains of MSSA (NCTC 11561) and known MRSA were plated in two quadrants of a Mueller Hinton agar and two test strains were plated on the other two quadrants. A 5 µg disc of methicillin was placed in the center and incubation at 30°C was carried out for 24 hours. Results were read against known controls.
For PCR about 10 colonies on each plate were lightly touched using a straight wire loop. The colonies were emulsified in 2 µL of Tris EDTA Buffer (pH 7.4) deposited in a microcentrifuge tube. Bacteria were then lysed by irradiation in a BPL microwave oven using seven pulses of 60 seconds each with a 60 second interval in between. No further DNA extraction was carried out. After irradiation 25 µL of premixed multiplex PCR mix was added. Each 25 μl reaction mix contained : 10 × PCR Buffer 2.5 μl, GATC Mix 1.5 μl, distilled water 19.5 µL, Primer mix (2.5 pM each) 1 µL. Taq Polymerase 0.25 μL (The PCR core Kit, Bangalore Genie). Primers concentration was 2.5 picoM per 25 μL reaction mix. Their sequences were as previously described [5, 6, 7, 8].
mecA1-5 ‘: GTA GAA ATG ACT GAA CGT CCG ATA A,
mecA2-5 ‘: CCA ATT CCA CAT TGT TTC GGT CTA A,
femB1-5’: TTA CAG AGT TAA CTG TTA CC
femB2-5’: ATA CAA ATC CAG CAC GCT CT.
PCR was carried out in a thermal cycler (Hybaid Omni E). Cycling parameters were: a hot start of 94°C for 4 min was followed by 30 cycles of melting at 94°C for 45 sec, annealing at 50°C for 45 sec and extension at 72°C for 60 sec. Electrophoresis was carried out using 10 μL of product in a 2% agarose gel containing ethidium bromide at 50V for 2 hours. A 100 bp ladder was simultaneously loaded as molecular weight marker. The results were read in a UV transilluminator and photographed using a Wratten No 9 filter.
Results
Of the 100 swabs taken, 8 tubes showed growth on MCSA (tubes 6,15,42,69,73,78, 86 and 87). The biochemical characterisation and results of ABST are shown in Table-1. Using conventional biochemical testing, of the 8 organisms isolated, 4 were shown to be MRSA (tubes 6,73,78 and 87), 3 were MSSA (tubes 15,69 and 86) and 1 was seen to be MSCNS (tube 42). On PCR, the mecA gene gave a 310 bp fragment, femB gene gave a 651 bp fragment The Multiplex PCR technique was able to identify the presence of mecA and femB genes and showed presence of both the bands in the 5 organisms (tubes 6,15,73.78 and 87). The 2 MSSA organisms showed presence of femB gene only (tube 69 and 86) and absence of mecA gene. MRCNS showed the presence of mecA band only (tube 42). The results of the multiplex PCR are shown in Fig-1.
TABLE 1.
Genotyping and Phenotyping characteristics of isolated staphylococci
| Tube numbers |
||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 15 | 42 | 69 | 73 | 78 | 86 | 87 | |
| Catalase | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Slide coagulase | + | - | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Tube coagulase | + | + | - | - | + | + | + | + |
| ABST | ||||||||
| Ampicillin | R | S | S | S | R | R | S | R |
| Cefotaxime | R | R | R | S | R | R | S | R |
| Netilmicin | R | R | R | s | R | R | S | R |
| Gentamicin | R | R | S | R | R | R | S | R |
| Clindamycin | R | S | S | R | R | S | R | S |
| Augmentin | R | S | S | S | MS | R | S | S |
| Erythromycin | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
| Trimethoprim | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
| Sulpha | R | R | R | R | R | MS | R | R |
| Chloramphenicol | S | S | S | S | S | S | R | S |
| Vancomycin | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Diagnosis of conventional ABST | MRSA | MSSA | MSCNS | MSSA | MRSA | MRSA | MSSA | MRSA |
| mecA Gene | + | + | + | . | + | + | − | + |
| fern B Gene | + | + | - | + | + | + | + | + |
| Diagnosis following genotyping | MRSA | MRSA | MRCNS | MSSA | MRSA | MRSA | MSSA | MRSA |
Fig. 1.

Photograph of PCR products show mec A and fern B bands in MRSA (isolates 6.15,73,78. 87), only the fern B band in MSSA (isolates 69.86) and only mec A band in MRCNS (tubes 42). The first lane shows the molecular weight marker of 100 bp ladder, relevant controls are shown in lanes 2 (MRCNS), lane 3 (MSSA) and lane 4 (MRSA).
Discussion
In healthy subjects, over time, three patterns of S aureus carriage can be distinguished : about 20% of people are persistent carriers, 60% are intermittent carriers and approximately 20% almost never carry S aureus. Elimination of carriage status appears to be an attractive preventive strategy in patients at risk [6]. Airborne dispersal of S aureus by shedders in association with a viral URI may be an important mechanism of transmission of MRSA in hospitals [9]. MRSA from a patient can be transferred to other patients on medical equipment or on the hands of staff who do not adhere strictly to infection control measures [10]. In children throat and perianal site screenings have a higher sensitivity than nasal swabs in identifying carrier status [11]. Studies have shown that MRSA can persist in the oral cavities for more than five years, and that oral cavity can serve as a reservoir for MRSA with the potential to cause nosocomial infections [12]. Studies show that carriers harbour MRSA for more than three years and that, culture of the anterior nasal swab alone is a valid and efficient method for the detection of persistent MRSA carriage [13]. The present study used anterior nasal swabs to identify carriage status of MRSA.
MRSA carriage on admission to the hospital may be an increasing and underestimated problem. Troillet et al [14] have shown the prevalence of MRSA nasal carriage to be 2.6% on admission to hospital. In our study, the MRSA colonisation of anterior nares was found in 5% of the anterior nasal swabs. They were resistant to penicillin, sulphamethoxazole, trimethoprim, tetracyline and gentamicin. In a Japanese study 9% nurses and 5% doctors were found to be nasal MRSA carriers. The isolates were resistant to multiple antibiotics but they remained sensitive to vancomycin [15]. Auto-infection from nasal carriage or cross-infection, probably via staff hands seemed to be the most common mode of acquisition of MRSA infections [16]. A study from Pakistan has shown MRSA in 1.78% hospital personnel [17]. In the present study MRSA has been studied in hospital staff and patients admitted more than two weeks in the hospital and showed a 5% carriage rate. Mir et al [4] used the soft MCSA test, a highly specific bedside test for detection of colonisation with MRSA. Our study combines the use of MCSA with PCR for the rapid diagnosis of MRSA.
Identification of MRSA by drug-susceptibility tests alone poses a serious problem, because a considerable number of clinical S aureus isolates are borderline resistant to methicillin. Hence, a quick and sensitive method of PCR based amplification for the detection of the mecA gene is necessary. The mecA gene codes for the drug resistant polypeptides called penicillin-binding protein 2a (PBP2a) or 2′(PB2′), and mediates the clinically relevant resistance to all beta-lactam antibiotics [18]. For appropriate treatment of MRSA infection, rapid detection of mecA is extremely important. However, identical mecA genes have been found in both coagulase-positive and coagulase-negative methicillin resistant Staphylococcus. A second gene related to the expression of methicillin-resistance has been called femA. Oshima et al [7] amplified both mecA and femA genes by PCR and found the mec A gene was positive in all MRSA strains and 6% MSSA strains. The femA gene was positive in all MRSA and MSSA strains. On the other hand the femA gene was absent from coagulase-negative Staphylococcus strains with the methicillin resistant phenotype. Towner et al [8] used the mecA and femB gene to detect MRSA. The femB gene is involved in pentaglycine side chain formation and inter peptide bridge as well as expression of methicillin resistance. Cotter et al [19] used a one-tube triplex PCR wherein three genes, mecA, femA and the extracellular thermonuclease gene (nuc), were simultaneously amplified. MSSA and coagulase-negative Staphylococci were also tested and the assay was found to be MRSA specific. Our study studied the mecA and femB genes in 5 of the isolates rendering them to be classified as MRSA. The PCR assay is a sensitive and reliable procedure for the rapid diagnosis of MRSA infection, even in cases in which the conventional MIC assay failed to detect MRSA [20], In our study, 5 MRSA showed the presence of the mecA and femB genes'.
This study compared and combined culture of anterior nasal swabs in MCSA with a multiplex PCR as a strategy for early detection of MRSA. Accurate and rapid results could be available in as short as 24 hours following this method. This strategy can be used to rapidly detect and prevent outbreaks of MRSA infection in hospital wards. Thus, culture on MSCA and combination with multiplex PCR for mecA and femB made the test both rapid and specific.
References
- 1.Edon HJ, Pinney RJ. Meihicillin-resisiani Staphylococcus aureus-an overview. J Clin Pharm Ther. 1991 Dec;16(6):453–462. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2710.1991.tb00335.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wichelhaus TA, Schulze J, Hunfeld KP, Schafer V, Brade V. Clonal heterogeneity, distribution and pathogenicity of methicillin-resistant S aureus. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1997;16(12):893–897. doi: 10.1007/BF01700555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ayliffe GA. The progressive intercontinental spread of methicillin-resistant S aureus. Clin Infect Dis. 1997;24(Suppl 1):S74–S79. doi: 10.1093/clinids/24.supplement_1.s74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mir N, Sanchez M, Baquero F, Lopez B, Calderon C, Canton R. Soft mannitol agar Cloxacillin test: A highly specific bedside test for detection of colonisation with Metliicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36(4):986–989. doi: 10.1128/jcm.36.4.986-989.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Menon PK, Nagendra A. A rapid method to identify mecA and femB genes in MRSA. MJAFI. 2001;57:194–196. doi: 10.1016/S0377-1237(01)80041-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kluytmans J, van Belkum A, Verbrugh H. Nasal carriage of S aureus: epidemiology, underlying mechanisms, and associated risks. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1997;10(3):505–520. doi: 10.1128/cmr.10.3.505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Oshima T, Miyachi H, Fusegawa H, Masukawa A, Ikeda M, Ando Y. Detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by in vitro enzymatic amplification of mecA and femA genes. Rinsho Byori. 1993;41(7):773–778. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Towner KJ, Talbot CS, Curran C, Webster A, Humphreys H. Development and evaluation of a PCR based immunoassay for rapid detection of MRSA. J Med Microbiol. 1998;47:607–613. doi: 10.1099/00222615-47-7-607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sheretz RJ, Reagan DR, Hampton KD, Robertson KL, Streed SA, Hoen HM. A cloud adult: the S aureus-virus interaction revisited. Am Intern Med. 1996;124(6):539–547. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-124-6-199603150-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mueller-Preinru M, Muzlovic I. Typing of consecutive MRSA isolates from intensive care unit patients and staff with pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Int J antimicrob Agents. 1998;10(4):309–312. doi: 10.1016/s0924-8579(98)00056-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Shahin R, Johnson IL, Jameison F, McGeer A, Tolkin J, Ford-Jones EL. MRSA carriage in a child care center following a case of disease. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1999;153(8):864–868. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.153.8.864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Suzuki J, Komalsuzawa H, Sugai M, Suzuki T, Kozai K, Miyake Y. A long-term survey of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the oral cavity of children. Microbiol Immunol. 1997;41(9):681–686. doi: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.1997.tb01911.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sanford MD, Widmer AF, Bale MJ, Jones RN, Wenzel RP. Efficient detection and long-term persistence of the carriage of MRSA. Clin Infect Dis. 1994;19(6):1123–1128. doi: 10.1093/clinids/19.6.1123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Troillet N, Carmeli Y, Samore MH, Dakos J, Eichelberger K, DeGirolami PC. Carriage of MRSA at hospital admission. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1998;19(3):181–185. doi: 10.1086/647791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kwashima T. A study of nasal carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Kansenshogaku Zasshi. 1992;66(6):686–695. doi: 10.11150/kansenshogakuzasshi1970.66.686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Coello R, Jimenez J, Garcia M, Arroyo P, Minguez D, Fernandez C. Prospective study of infection, colonization and carriage of MRSA in an outbreak affecting 990 patients. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1994;13(1):74–81. doi: 10.1007/BF02026130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ashiq B, The carrier state MRSA. A hospital study “screening of hospital personnel” for nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus. J Pak Med Assoc. 1989;39(2):35–38. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hiramatsu K, Kihara H, Yokota T. Analysis of borderline-resistant strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus using polymerase chain reaction. Microbiol Immunol. 1992;36(5):445–453. doi: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.1992.tb02043.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Cotter L, Lynch M, Cryan B, Greer P, Fanning S. Investigation of a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) outbreak in an Irish hospital: triplex PCR and DNA amplification fingerprinting. J Hosp Infect. 1997;36(1):37–47. doi: 10.1016/s0195-6701(97)90089-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Tokue Y, Shoji S, Satoh K, Watanabe A, Molomiya M. Comparison of a polymerase chain reaction assay and a conventional microbiologic method for detection of MRSA. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1992;36(1):6–9. doi: 10.1128/aac.36.1.6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
