Skip to main content
Medical Journal, Armed Forces India logoLink to Medical Journal, Armed Forces India
. 2011 Jul 21;57(2):134–138. doi: 10.1016/S0377-1237(01)80134-9

PROSTAGLANDINS IN CONGENITAL HEART DISEASE

MUKTI SHARMA *, M SASIKUMAR +, SD KARLOOPIA #, BN SHAHI **
PMCID: PMC4925861  PMID: 27407318

Introduction

Prior to the use of prostaglandins (PGE1) many infants with ductus arteriosus dependent congenital heart disease (CHD) born outside tertiary care centres did not survive the period from diagnosis to inter-hospital transportation for surgery. Development in the area of neonatal cardiac surgery has increased the importance of rapid diagnosis and stabilisation of infants with CHD. Survival after cardiac defect repair has increased in the past decade. Perhaps an important factor in this increase appears to be the early use of PGE1 to provide a more clinically stable patient for surgery [1]. Therapy with PGE1 can effectively maintain an infant's cardiovascular function until palliative or corrective procedure can be performed. At present many hospitals do not maintain a supply of PGE1 mainly because of its expense and limited use due to the various side effects.

Pharmacology of the Ductus Arteriosus

To appreciate the importance of PGE1 therapy it is necessary to briefly review the physiology of the ductus and its relevance to infants with CHD. In the foetus ductus arteriosus connects pulmonary artery to descending aorta. Endogenous prostaglandins produced during gestation keep the ductus patent, as a result, majority of the blood passes from pulmonary artery through the ductus by passing the lungs and going directly to the aorta where it is transported to placenta for oxygenation. At birth, an increase in arterial oxygen saturation and a decrease in amount of endogenous prostaglandins, both stimulate an alteration of vascular integrity promoting ductal closure. Exogenous prostaglandins like PGE1 can be used to maintain the patency of the ductus in neonates where bypassing a defective vessel or continued mixing of oxygenated and unoxygenated blood is needed to provide adequate systemic circulation [2].

The constricted ductus arteriosus is unusually sensitive to PGE1 responding with dilation at dosage rates below those required for altering systemic or pulmonary pressure or resistance. Ductal preservation by infusion of PGE1 can be life saving in neonates with heart disease characterised by severe restriction of pulmonary blood flow, poor arterial venous admixture and severe systemic hypoperfusion.

Indications

a) Restriction of pulmonary blood flow.

Prior to the advent of PGE1 early management of neonates with pulmonary atresia or other anomalies associated with marked limitation of pulmonary blood flow represented one of the major problems in neonatal cardiology. Patients were usually critically ill in the first few days of life as the ductus constricted and without intervention they generally died within the first few weeks of life. In rare instances the ductus rapidly constricts and pulmonary blood flow diminishes markedly. As a result overwhelming acidosis develops, and infant becomes critically ill. A majority of these children are lost due to delay in reaching a tertiary care centre. Even those who reach are too sick to withstand anaesthesia with the attendant risks of prolonged hypoxemia.

Since mid 1970s the use of PGE1 to maintain ductal patency has significantly improved the outlook of neonates with CHD characterised by marked restriction of pulmonary blood flow. Dilatation of the ductus is manifest by an immediate rise in PO2 often by as much as 20 to 30 mmHg. Selective aotograms have revealed wide dilatation of the ductus minutes after an infusion of PGE1 in prescribed dosage [3].

Infants improve clinically and since hypoxemia and acidosis is reversed, pertinent diagnostic studies can be implemented and the patient transferred to a tertiary care centre in a stable condition. PGE1 has been shown to dilate pulmonary vascular bed and PGE1 infusion may improve pulmonary blood flow by reducing pulmonary vascular resistance as well [4]. It has been seen that infants older than 96 hours were significantly less responsive than younger infants [5]. Patients with the lowest arterial P02before infusion demonstrate the greatest response. Some patients have been maintained on PGE1 for days and even weeks during which time right ventricular compliance improves [6]. Efficacy of PGE1 in improving pulmonary blood flow was evaluated by change in PaO2 and the value obtained one hour after therapy used to gauge the response. In a multicentre trial conducted over 56 centres in USA, it was observed that the mean PaO2 increased from 26.7 to 38.5 mmHg after infusion of PGE1. Infants with an initial PaO2 of less than 20 mm Hg had the greatest improvement as compared to those with an initial PaO2 of more than 40 mmHg who had virtually no response. If a rise in the Pa02 of 10 mmHg is considered to define clinically significant improvement 77% of such babies less than 96 hours old showed a favourable response whereas very few babies more than 96 hours old showed clinically significant improvement [5].

b) Poor arterio-venous admixture

Patients with transposition of the great arteries and an intact ventricular septum present in the early neonatal period with severe hypoxemia. The favoured approach to management of such anomalies is the arterial switch operation within the first two weeks of life. PGE1 is used in these sick neonates to ensure continuing patency of the ductus pending this procedure and serves as an important mixing site prior to surgery. In certain centres balloon atrial septostomy (BAS) is carried out to ensure mixing of blood at the atrial level. In addition to BAS, prostaglandins are advocated to achieve additional ductal shunting, however, increased fragility of ductal tissue among infants who have received prostaglandins has been described and may be complicating factor in the surgical ligation of ductus while performing arterial / atrial switch operation [7].

It has been observed that infants with transposition have a lower preinfusion Pa02 although the overall increase in PaO2 is similar to that in other infants with reduced pulmonary blood flow. Freed et al [5] reported that infants older than age 4 days and weighing more than 4 Kg at birth did not have a clinically significant rise in Pao2.

c) Ductal dependent systemic blood flow

Infants with various forms of hypoplastic left heart syndrome, including aortic atresia, critical aortic stenosis, interrupted aortic arch and severe juxtaductal coarctation of the aorta may depend on patency of the duct for survival during the early neonatal period. Natural constriction of the ductus results in low systemic cardiac output, shock, acidosis and death. Prostaglandins infusion has allowed such infants to remain viable for a longer period of time, so that potentially operable lesions can be identified and corrected. PGE1 usually improves descending aortic blood pressure and blood flow in infants with interruption of the aortic arch of juxtaductal coarctation and a closing ductus arteriosus. In a study where PGE1 was infused in 107 infants with duct dependent systemic flow, when the ductus was considered closed during cardiac catheterisation before the infusion of PGE1 reopening could not be accomplished, regardless of age (range 3 days – 5 months) [5]. An irreversibly closed ductus, acidosis and collapse are usually associated with a lower success rate with PGE1 infusion [8, 9, 10]. Improvement occurs in the majority in whom the ductus is partially constricted [5]. Clinically this is reflected by increased perfusion of the lower limbs, increased urine output and reduced metabolic acidemia. It has also been observed that cyanotic infants achieve a maximal beneficial response within 30 minutes of statring the infusion whereas maximal response occurs 1.5 hours (range 15 min to 4 hours) later in infants with acyanotic congenital heart disease [11].

d) Refractory Severe Hypertension

PGE1 infusion is a possible therapeutic alternative for babies with idiopathic arterial calcification complicated by severe hypertension refractory to conventional treatment [13].

Prostaglandin Therapy

Since prostaglandin is metabolised rapidly infusion must be continuous. Over two thirds of the circulating prostaglandin is metabolised in a single pass through the lungs, and the metabolites are excreted by the kidneys within 24 hours. Hence, the agent should be infused through a pump delivery system at an initial intravenous infusion of 0.05 micrograms/kg/min although to avoid side effects lower dosages (0.005–0.01 micrograms/Kg/min) have been recommended by some workers with equal efficacy [5]. A ductus that has functionally closed but is anatomically capable of reopening may respond to prostaglandins, however, results are better when the agent is administered as early as possible so that the infant is not subjected to a period of severe hypoxemia. The decreased response of the ductus to PGE1 infusion after 96 hours of age suggests that either anatomical closure is complete or there is irreversible functional closure due to lack of responsiveness of prestaglandin receptors by this age. However patients with cyanotic CHD have responded as late as 36 days of age [11].

There have been reports on newborn children, in whom only prostaglandins E2 was used to perform a better lung or kidney perfusion by opening ductus arteriosus. The diagnosis of the children were pulmonary atresia, hypoplastic left heart syndrome, transposition of the great arteries with or without ventricular septal defect, coarctation of the aorta and tetralogy of Fallot. The dose of prostaglandins E2 infusion used was 0.1 microgram/kg body weight/min and consecutive reduction depending on the capillary pO2. An oral prostaglandin preparation E2 has also been administered. The effectiveness and simplicity of oral PGE2 administration have advantages over intravenous administration, especially for long-term treatment. The duration of treatment ranged between 15 min and 37 days. There was a significant increase of capillary pO2 under prostglandin E2 treatment (p less than 0.0001), the increase of capillary pO2 correlated negatively with the initial pO2 before treatment (p less than 0.05), but was not dependent on the age of children [14, 15].

Side Effects

In several large studies the incidence of side effects has been reported to vary from 21.5 to 53% [11, 12]. The common side effects are cutaneous vasodilatation, apnoea or hypoventilation, seizures or jitteriness, pyrexia and diarrhoea. However, using the suggested dosage range, significant complications are rare. Flushing has been reported in 10% of patients [5]. Severe vasodilatation of an upper extremity secondary to arterial infusion in the arch of the aorta is usually not seen.

When considering the use of prostaglandins in a patient, who is to have surgical manipulation in the region of the ductus, it is important the surgeon be aware of increased risk of surgically induced rupture of the ductus [11]. It has been reported that mucopolysaccharides are increased throughout the ductus. These changes produced increased fragility of the ductal and juxtaductal structures, thus increasing the likelihood of spontaneous aneurysms and rupture, or of tearing or rupture at the aortic and pulmonary junctions at the time of surgical closure of the ductus. Unusual fragility of the ductus, pulmonary artery, and aorta has been observed during ligation of the ductus following prostglandin E infusion lasting seven and ten days. Additionally, another patient who had received prostaglandins E infusion for six days has been reported to have aneurysmal fullness of the ductus arteriosus at autopsy. The histologic findings and intraoperative experience in this study suggest that there may be a real danger of spontaneous or surgically related rupture of the ductus arteriosus after prolonged infusion of prostaglandins [16, 17].

Hyperpyrexia and apnoea that occur in 10–15% of cases are the most severe complications with prostaglandin infusion. These episodes are known to cease after the infusion is discontinued. Sudden onset apnoea my require immediate intubation and ventilation during treatment; hence ventilatory support should be available before a neonate is started on PGE1. The question of whether apnoea attacks are dose related remains controversial however in the multicentre trial side effects like apnoea, jitteriness and pyrexia did not appear to be dose related [5].

Short and long term prostaglandins infusion in neonates is also reported to be associated with cortical proliferation throughout the skeletal system. Total resolution of these changes has occurred in seven patients described to date; other reports did not note either the time or the regression of these changes. Skeletal changes may occur within 9 days of initiation of prostaglandins therapy and include widened fontanelles, pretibial and soft-tissue swelling, and swelling of the upper and lower extremities. These reactions may last up to 38 weeks following discontinuation of therapy. Alkaline phosphates (AP) concentrations have been shown to be increased in 4 cases, as well as in 1 retrospective analysis. Although these were not prospective studies, evaluation of AP may provide a means to monitor neonates receiving prostglandin therapy [18]. The periostitis was associated with limb pain and considerable swelling of the extremities in all children. Periostitis improved on cessation of prostaglandin infusion, and by 6 weeks after cessation of the drug, periostitis decreased significantly. Periostitis seemed more dependent on the duration of administration of prostaglandins than on dosage of prostaglandins administered. Awareness of this entity is essential not only for the team caring for these infants but also for consultant paediatric orthopaedists to avoid excessive investigation for infection, metabolic disease, or vitamin deficiencies that resemble prostaglandin induced periostitis [18, 19, 20, 21].

Two cases of neonatal acute gastric outlet obstruction related to prostaglandin induced gastric foveolar hyperplasia, which developed following infusion of prostaglandins E1 (PGE1) for treatment of hypoplastic left heart syndrome have also been reported [22, 23].

Experience with PGE1

The drug is commercially available in India since April 1995. Author has recorded the outcome of use of PGE1 in 61 infants [24]. Age at time of starting PGE1 infusion ranged from 18 hours to 50 days. 41 of these were more than a week of age, 18 were more than 14 days, and 2 were above one month. PGE1 was started in an initial dose of 0.05mcgm/Kg/min, decreased to 0.005–0.01 mcgm/Kg/min for maintenance. Desired response was obtained in all except one infant. The indications for use of PGE1 were to increase pulmonary blood flow in 32 cases with pulmonary atresia (PAt), tricuspid atresia or critical pulmonary stenosis with or without a BT shunt (Gp I). The other indications were to increase systemic blood flow in 15 cases with coarctation of aorta (CoA), hypoplastic left heart or interrupted aortic arch (IAA) (GPII); to improve mixing in 12 cases of transposition of great vessels (TGA) (GP III) and to improve the left ventricular volume by keeping the duct open in 2 cases of TGA with intact ventricular septum (IVS). The efficacy of the drug was assessed by a rise in SPO2 determined non-invasively. A rise in SPO2 > 10% within the first half an hour of starting prostaglandins was considered favourable for GPI and III, and the appearance of lower limbs pulse in GP II. Left ventricular volumes were serially measured by echocardiography in cases where PGE1 was given in TGA-IVS after balloon atrial septostomy (BAS). The drug was successful in 59 of the 61 cases. The mean (range) of increase in SPO2 in GP I was 33 ± 14 (28–43)% and GP III it was 21 ± 12(14–32)%. The 2 failures were a 39 day old baby with PAt and a seven day old baby with COA and renal failure. Side effects included apnoea in 5(9%) of 56 spontaneously breathing patients. NEC and hyperpyrexia occurred where PGE1 was used in a dose higher than 0.2 mcgm/kg/min. Jitteriness was seen in 1. 4 patients died. 2 were related to PGE1, 1 due to failure, another due to its side effects. Definitive procedures were performed in 49 cases electively. PGE1 was used upto 13 days with sustained benefit.

PGE1 is a major addition to medical management before, during and even after palliative or corrective surgery in infants with ductus arteriosus dependent heart disease. Although many of these infants are older than 4 days of age when diagnosed, PGE1 appears to be effective and therefore should be used regardless of age to dilate ductus arteriosus and improve perfusion.

References

  • 1.Buck ML. Prostaglandins E1 treatment of congenital heart disease: use prior to neonatal transport. DICP Ann Pharmacother. 1991;25:408–409. doi: 10.1177/106002809102500413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Olley PM, Coceani F, Bodach E. E type prostaglandins: a new emergncy therapy for certain cyanotic congenital heart malformations. Circulation. 1976;53:728–734. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.53.4.728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Coceni F, Olley PM. The response of the ductus arteriosus to prostaglandins. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1973;51:220–223. doi: 10.1139/y73-031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cassin S, Tyler T, Wallis R. The effects of Prostaglandin E1 on foetal pulmonary vascular resistance. J Clin Invest. 1986;45:399–412. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Freed MD, Heymann MA, Lewis AB, Roehl SL, Kensey RC. Prostaglandin E1 in infants with ductus arteriosus dependent congenital heart disease. Circulation. 1981;61:899–904. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.64.5.899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Taxieuria OH, Carpenter B, McMurray SB. Long tern prostaglandin E1 therapy in congenital heart defects. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1984;3(3):838–852. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(84)80262-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Calder A, Kierker JA, Neutz JM, Starling MB. Pathology of the ductus arterious treated with prostaglandins: comparisons with untreated cases. Pediatr Crdiol 19894;5(2):85–92. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 8.Heymann MA, Berman W, Jr, Rudolf AM, Whitman V. Dilation of the ductus arteriosus by prostaglandin E1 in aortic arch abnormalities. Circulation. 1979;59:169–173. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.59.1.169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lewis AB, Takahashi M, Lurie PR. Administration of Prostaglandin E1 in neonates with critical congenital cardiac defects. J Pediatr. 1978;93:481–485. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(78)81171-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hastreiter AR, van Der Horst RL, Sepheri B, Du Brow IW, Fisher EA, Levitsky S. Prostaglandin E1 infusion in newborns with hypoplastic left ventricle and aortic atresia. Pediatr Cardiol. 1982;2:95–98. doi: 10.1007/BF02424943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hallidie-Smith KA. Prostaglandin E1 in suspected ductus dependent cardic malformation. Arch Dis Child. 1984;59:1020–1027. doi: 10.1136/adc.59.11.1020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lewis AB, Freed MD, Heymann MA, Roehl SK, Kensey RC. Side effects of therapy with Prostaglandin E1 in infants with critical congenital heart disease. Circulation. 1981;64:893–898. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.64.5.893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ciana G, Colonna F, Forleo V, Brizzi F, Benettoni A, de Vonderweid U. Idiopathic arterial calcification of infancy: effectiveness of prostaglandin infusion for treatment of secondary hypertension refractory to conventional therapy: case report. Pediatr Cardiol. 1977;18:67–71. doi: 10.1007/s002469900114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Schlemmer M, Khoss A, Salzer HR, Wimmer M. prostaglandin E2 in newborns with congenital heart disease. Z Kardiol. 1982;71:452–457. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Silove ED, Coe JY, Shiu MF, Brunt JD, Page AJ, Singh SP. Oral prostaglandin E2 in ductus-dependent pulmonary circulation. Circulation. 1981;63:682–688. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.63.3.682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Cole RB, Abman S, Aziz KU, Bharati S, Lev M. Prolonged prostaglandin E1 infusion: histologic effects on the patent ductus arteriosus. Pediatris. 1981;67:816–819. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Tsubata S, Hashimoto I, Ichida F, Miyazaki A, Okada T, Murakami A. Aneurysmal change of the ductus arteriosus after prostaglandin E1 administration for pulmonary atresia: demonstration with magnetic resonance imaging. Pediatr Cardiol. 1994;15:30–32. doi: 10.1007/BF00797003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kaufman MB, EL-Chaar GM. Bone and tissue changes following prostaglandin therapy in neonates. Ann Pharmacother. 1996;30:269–274. doi: 10.1177/106002809603000311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kalloghlian AK, Frayha HH, deMoor MM. Cortical hyperostosis simulating oesteomyelitis after short-term prostaglandin E1 infusion. Eur J Pediatr. 1996;155:173–174. doi: 10.1007/BF01953932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Letts M, Pang E, Simons J. Prostaglandin-induced neonatal periostitis. J Pediatr Orthop. 1994;14:809–813. doi: 10.1097/01241398-199414060-00023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Woo K, Emery J, Peabody J. Cortical hyperostosis: a complication of prolonged prostaglandin infusion in infants awaiting cardiac transplantation. Pediatrics. 1994;93:417–420. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kobayashi N, Aida N, Nishimura G, Kashimura T, Ohta M, Kawataki M. Acute gastric outlet obstruction following the administration of prostaglandin; an additional case. Pediatr Radiol. 1997;27:57–59. doi: 10.1007/s002470050064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Mercado-Deane MG, Burton EM, Brawley AV, Hatley R. Prostaglandin — induced foveolar hyperplasia simulating pyloric stenosis in an infant with cyanotic heart disease. Pediatr Radiol. 1994;24:45–46. doi: 10.1007/BF02017660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Saxena A, Sharma M, Kothari SS, Juneja R, Reddy SCB, Sharma R. Prostaglandin E1 in infants with congenital heart disease: Indian experience. Ind Pediatr. 1998;35:1063–1069. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Medical Journal, Armed Forces India are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES