Abstract
Fungal infections of the nose and paranasal sinuses can be categorized into invasive and non-invasive forms. The clinical presentation and course of the disease is primarily determined by the immune status of the host and can range from harmless or subtle presentations to life threatening complications. Invasive fungal infections are categorized into acute, chronic or chronic granulomatous entities. Immunocompromised patients with poorly controlled diabetes mellitus, HIV and patients receiving chemotherapy or chronic oral corticosteroids are mostly affected. Mycetoma and Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis are considered non-invasive forms. Computer tomography is the gold-standard in sinonasal imaging and is complimented by Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as it is superior in the evaluation of intraorbital and intracranial extensions. The knowledge and identification of the characteristic imaging patterns in invasive – and non- invasive fungal rhinosinusitis is crucial and the radiologist plays an important role in refining the diagnosis to prevent a possible fatal outcome.
Keywords: Complications, fungal infections, invasive, magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography, non-invasive, sinonasal
INTRODUCTION
Fungi are ubiquitous in nature, and human exposure to fungi is unavoidable. The extent of fungal infections of the nose and paranasal sinuses is, therefore, primarily determined by the immune status of the host rather than the presence or absence of fungal organisms and can range from saprophytic colonization to orbital and cerebral involvement with often fatal outcomes. Due to a growing number of chemotherapy, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infections, and diabetes mellitus, the number of susceptible immunocompromised hosts is increasing. Sinonasal fungal infections can be broadly divided into invasive and noninvasive forms. Invasive fungal sinusitis is defined by the presence of fungal hyphae within the mucosa, submucosa, bone, or blood vessels of the paranasal sinuses, differentiating it from noninvasive forms.[1,2] Depending on the immunologic response of the host and the course of the disease, invasive fungal sinusitis can be categorized into acute, chronic, or chronic granulomatous entities. Mycetoma and allergic fungal rhinosinusitis are considered noninvasive forms. Figure 1 summarizes the forms and characteristics of fungal rhinosinusitis and [Figure 2] gives an overview of organisms involved in sinonasal and orbital fungal infections.[3] Risk factors for the development of fungal rhinosinusitis and treatment options are summarized in Table 1.[1]
Table 1.
Computer tomography (CT) is the gold standard in paranasal sinus imaging and is complemented by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as it is superior in the evaluation of intracranial and intraorbital extensions.[2,4]
NONINVASIVE FUNGAL SINUSITIS: MYCETOMA (FUNGUS BALL)
A mycetoma is a noninvasive, dense conglomeration of fungal hyphae within a sinus cavity secondary to a deficient mucociliary clearance mechanism.[2] It is primarily caused by Aspergillus fumigatus, resulting in chronic rhinosinusitis predominantly involving the maxillary sinus (84%) and it is often found in older immunocompetent females.[1,3,5]
On noncontrast CT imaging, a mycetoma appears as a hyperattenuating mass with intralesional metal-dense spots corresponding to fungal waste products and it is often accompanied by perilesional reactive osteitis. On T1- and T2-weighted imaging (WI), a fungal ball appears hypointense due to the absence of water and with an hyperintense-inflamed mucosal lining on T2-WI [Figure 3].[2]
ALLERGIC FUNGAL SINUSITIS
Allergic fungal sinusitis is an IgE-mediated hypersensitivity reaction to fungal elements and the most common form of fungal sinusitis.[1,4] Disease tends to be bilateral and asymmetric involving multiple sinuses with a frequent nasal component.[1,2] Patients typically have an intact immune system and a history of atopy, including allergic rhinitis or asthma and can present with proptosis, telecanthus, or gross facial dysmorphia.[1] Causative agents include dematiaceous (Bipolaris, Curvularia, and Alternaria) and hyaline molds (Aspergillus and Fusarium).[1,3,4,5]
On CT imaging, the paranasal sinuses appear enlarged with near-complete opacification due to mucin accumulation, which appears hyperdense on noncontrast CT imaging.[2,6] MRI T1-WIs show mixed signal intensities of the allergic mucin and characteristic signal voids on T2-WI, which are attributed to its high concentration of metal ions, proteins, and low free-water content.[1,2,6] The overlying inflamed mucosal lining appears relatively hypointense on T1-WI and hyperintense on T2-WI, with increased signal intensity upon administration of intravenous gadolinium [Figure 4].[2] As the quantity of fungal mucin increases, the involved paranasal sinuses begin to resemble a mucocele and bony remodeling, and decalcification may occur with subsequent nasal, intraorbital, or intracranial involvement mimicking malignancy.
INVASIVE FUNGAL SINUSITIS
Depending on the progression of the disease and the immune status of the host, invasive fungal sinusitis can be categorized into acute, chronic, or granulomatous subtypes. Causative agents most commonly identified are Aspergillus and fungi of the order Murocales (Zygomycetes). Their ability to angio-invade reflects in the presence of fungal hyphal forms within the mucosa, submucosa, blood vessels, and bone, often resulting in orbital and intracranial involvement.[4] Complications may include orbital and intracranial extensions with cavernous sinus thrombosis, parenchymal cerebritis or abscess, meningitis, osteomyelitis, mycotic aneurysm, stroke, and hematogenous dissemination.
Acute invasive fungal rhinosinusitis is found in an immunocompromised setting with a course of disease of 4 weeks or less.[6] Chronic invasive fungal rhinosinusitis shows a prolonged clinical development of over more than 12 weeks and it is found in immunocompetent or slightly immunocompromised patients.[5,6] Granulomatous-invasive fungal sinusitis is characterized by the presence of noncaseating granulomas in immunocompetent hosts and a course of disease of over 12 weeks.[7] Aspergillus flavus is mostly identified as the causative agent and infections are primarily found in Sudan, India, and Pakistan, with less prevalence in the United States.[7]
ACUTE INVASIVE FUNGAL RHINOSINUSITIS
Acute invasive fungal rhinosinusitis is the most urgent and lethal form of fungal sinusitis with a mortality of 50–80%.[2] Immunocompromised patients with poorly controlled diabetes mellitus and those receiving chemotherapy or chronic oral corticosteroids and patients with HIV are most commonly affected.[2,4,5] Aspergillus is the fungal species predominantly identified in patients with neutropenia and fungi of the Zygomycetes class are mostly encountered in diabetic patients.[2,8] Infection commonly begins as mucosal inflammation around the middle turbinate and rapidly spreads to the maxillary, ethmoid, or sphenoid sinus, usually affecting multiple unilateral sinuses.[9] Infectious spread to the adjacent soft tissue, and periantral fat planes, orbits, and central nervous system occur through direct extension or through vascular invasion owing to the angio-invasive nature of the fungi. Hyphal growth into the vessel lumen causes endothelial dysfunction and thrombosis.[8]
Orbital involvement is often characterized by periorbital edema, ptosis, ophthalmoplegia, visual loss, or proptosis. Altered mental status is concerned for spread to the central nervous system, which is at an increased risk if the posterior ethmoid or sphenoid cells are affected, and its involvement is associated with twice the mortality.[8,9]
Nonspecific findings on CT scan include mass effect, bony dehiscence, thickening of the extraocular muscles, and inflammatory changes of the orbit and orbital apex. Mucosal secretions may be hyper- or hypo-attenuating, although hyperattenuation is mostly attributed to chronic invasive fungal rhinosinusitis. MRI further evaluates the soft tissue extension beyond the sinuses to the periantral fat (intraorbital or masticator space), the cavernous sinus, and the brain and therefore, better demonstrates the findings of fulminant fungal invasion [Figures 5–7]. Biopsy remains crucial in the diagnosis of acute invasive fungal rhinosinusitis to isolate the fungus involved and initiate the appropriate treatment.
CHRONIC INVASIVE FUNGAL RHINOSINUSITIS
Patients are usually immunocompetent or slightly immunocompromised due to corticosteroid therapy, diabetes mellitus, or AIDS.[5,2,6] The most common pathogens identified are those causing acute invasive fungal sinusitis as well as dematiaceous molds (Bipolaris, Curvularia, Alternaria, and Pseudoalleschia), affecting mostly the ethmoid and sphenoid sinuses.[1,5,6] Patients usually endure sinus pain, nasal discharge, low-grade fever, and epistaxis, and infection can be recurrent and persistent.
Imaging features are similar to acute invasive fungal rhinosinusitis, noninvasive forms, or a combination of both. On noncontrast CT imaging, a hyperattenuating mass with bony wall destruction extending into the adjacent structures such as the orbits, maxillary floor, and hard palate visualizes the chronic invasive course of the infection and may mimic malignancy.[2] MRI is more accurate for the evaluation of extension into the orbital apex, cavernous sinus, or brain [Figure 8].
CONCLUSION
Invasive and noninvasive sinonasal fungal infections are closely associated with the host's immune system and ability to generate a proper immune response. Depending on the immune status of the host, infections may present as harmless colonization or include noninvasive or invasive forms. Knowledge and identification of the characteristic imaging patterns found in invasive and noninvasive fungal rhinosinusitis allow the radiologists to help refine the diagnosis and guide clinicians in the further evaluation and initialization of a proper and timely treatment to help prevent a possibly fatal outcome.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
Footnotes
Available FREE in open access from: http://www.clinicalimagingscience.org/text.asp?2016/6/1/23/184010
REFERENCES
- 1.Soler ZM, Schlosser RJ. The role of fungi in diseases of the nose and sinuses. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2012;26:351–8. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2012.26.3807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Aribandi M, McCoy VA, Bazan C., 3rd Imaging features of invasive and noninvasive fungal sinusitis: A review. Radiographics. 2007;27:1283–96. doi: 10.1148/rg.275065189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kirszrot J, Rubin PA. Invasive fungal infections of the orbit. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2007;47:117–32. doi: 10.1097/IIO.0b013e31803776db. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hoxworth JM, Glastonbury CM. Orbital and intracranial complications of acute sinusitis. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2010;20:511–26. doi: 10.1016/j.nic.2010.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Thompson GR, 3rd, Patterson TF. Fungal disease of the nose and paranasal sinuses. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012;129:321–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2011.11.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mossa-Basha M, Ilica AT, Maluf F, Karakoç Ö, Izbudak I, Aygün N. The many faces of fungal disease of the paranasal sinuses: CT and MRI findings. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2013;19:195–200. doi: 10.5152/dir.2012.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kim TH, Jang HU, Jung YY, Kim JS. Granulomatous invasive fungal rhinosinusitis extending into the pterygopalatine fossa and orbital floor: A case report. Med Mycol Case Rep. 2012;1:107–11. doi: 10.1016/j.mmcr.2012.10.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gorovoy IR, Kazanjian M, Kersten RC, Kim HJ, Vagefi MR. Fungal rhinosinusitis and imaging modalities. Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2012;26:419–26. doi: 10.1016/j.sjopt.2012.08.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Middlebrooks EH, Frost CJ, De Jesus RO, Massini TC, Schmalfuss IM, Mancuso AA. Acute invasive fungal rhinosinusitis: A comprehensive update of CT findings and design of an effective diagnostic imaging model. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36:1529–35. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]