Abstract
Background: Few studies, to our knowledge, have examined the longitudinal association of snacking with child body mass index (BMI), especially in China, where the incidence of overweight and obesity has increased rapidly.
Objectives: Our objective was to examine the longitudinal association between snacking and BMI z score and to test whether this association differs by baseline weight status.
Methods: Using data from the China Health and Nutrition Survey (2006, 2009, and 2011), we characterized snack intake for 9 provinces and 3 megacities. We used linear mixed-effects models to examine longitudinally the association between snacking (none, low, medium, and high tertiles according to energy) and BMI z score in children aged 2–13 y at baseline, controlling for sex, urbanicity, parental education, physical activity, and foods consumed at meals (n = 2277 observations). We tested whether this association differed by baseline underweight, normal weight, or overweight/obese.
Results: Snacking is prevalent in Chinese children, with fruit being the most common snack. Snacking was not associated with meaningful BMI z score changes in normal-weight children. However, in children who were underweight at baseline, snacking in the top tertiles was associated with increases in BMI z scores from 2006 to 2011 (+1.2 and +1.1 BMI z score units for ages 2–6 and 7–13 y, respectively) (P < 0.05). In overweight/obese 2- to 6-y-old children at baseline, being in the lowest snacking tertile was associated with declines in BMI z score (−3.3), whereas in overweight 7- to 13-y-old children, being in the top tertile of snacking was associated with the greatest decline in BMI z score (−2.1) (P < 0.05). The direction and magnitude of associations did not vary regardless of adjustment for total energy intake.
Conclusions: Snacking in China, dominated by fruit consumption, is associated with decreased BMI in overweight/obese children and increased BMI in underweight children. More work will be needed to monitor this relation as Chinese diets continue to westernize.
Keywords: snacking, China, children, adolescent, overweight, obesity, diet, underweight, BMI z score
Introduction
In China, childhood obesity now poses a substantial concern (1). In fact, from 1989 to 2004, the relative increase in overweight was higher in children than adults when baseline weight was taken into account (2). In 2011, 10% of 2- to 6-y-old children were overweight and 12% were obese, with 13% and 6% of 7- to 11-y-old children overweight and obese, respectively (3). At the same time, however, 19% and 22% of 2- to 6-y-old and 7- to 11-y-old children were underweight, indicating a “double burden” of coexistent underweight and overweight/obesity in Chinese children (4). Yet, to date, there is minimal epidemiologic literature on factors related to changes in body weight in Chinese children.
Possible drivers of the body weight increase include dramatic declines in child physical activity (5, 6), as well as increasing concern about overfeeding of the doted-upon solitary child in 1-child families (7), although empirical evidence on the latter is limited (8). In recent decades, and accelerating in the last 10 y (9), diets have become increasingly westernized, and have included increased animal-source foods and high-fat, processed, and fried foods (9–11). With regards to behavior, despite being relatively uncommon only a decade ago, snacking has become increasingly prevalent: in 2004, only 28% of 2- to 6-y-old children and 19% of 7- to 12-y-old children ate between meals, whereas snacking increased to 59% and 54%, respectively, in 2009 (12). This increase in snacking reflects an overall global trend, marked by increased eating frequency (13).
Globally, urbanization has been a major driver of shifts in diet, activity, and obesity (14–16). However, it is unclear whether China’s megacities are somehow different with regard to dietary behaviors and body weight. Previous work looking specifically at snacking found that snacking is more prevalent in urban areas (10, 12), but no work has examined whether the energy contribution or type of snack differs for China’s 3 megacities, Shanghai, Beijing, and Chongqing, which were only added to the China Health and Nutrition Survey in 2011. These cities have experienced much greater penetration of the modern retail food sector and modern mass media marketing of processed food (11, 17, 18).
More important to understand is whether this trend toward snacking contributes to changes in BMI in Chinese children. In China, one study of children and adolescents in rural northwest China found that consuming snacks ≥4 times/wk was more common in normal-weight children than in obese children, but this study was cross-sectional and did not control for other potential factors, such as diet quality (19). In the United States and Europe, the evidence for the link between snacking and weight is mixed: despite evidence that increased eating frequency is linked to increased total daily energy intake (20–22), some studies have found no link between meal patterns, snacking, and overweight status (23–25), whereas others have found that increased snacking is positively associated with overweight (26–28). An additional (albeit cross-sectional) study of US teenaged children found that overweight and obesity actually decreased with increased snacking (29), and studies of European children aged 5–16 y also have found that more frequent eating has been linked to reduced adiposity (30) and decreased risk of overweight (31). The association between snacking and weight status could depend on its effect on total energy across the day: although both the energy density and increased portion sizes of snacks can contribute to excess energy intake (32, 33), other work (in adults) suggests that snacking could improve appetite control and promote energy regulation (34, 35).
To our knowledge, no work in China has examined longitudinally the relation between snacking and BMI z score in children, despite the concomitant increase in both snacking and overweight. This relation depends in part on the type of foods children consume as snacks: whereas snacks tend to be foods and beverages high in added sugars and fats in Western countries and South America, in China, previous work has shown fruit to be a top contributor to snacks (12).
The objectives of this study were the following: 1) to look descriptively at the types of snacks children aged 2–12 y consumed from 2006 to 2011 and examine whether types of snacks differed for megacities in 2011, and 2) to examine longitudinally whether snacking was associated with a higher BMI z score in children aged 2–12 y, as well as whether the relation between snacking and BMI was modified by weight status at baseline.
Methods
Survey methodology.
The methodology of the China Health and Nutrition Survey has been described previously (36, 37). In brief, the original survey in 1989 used a multistage random cluster design such that within each province, cities and counties were selected on income, communities were selected based on urbanicity, and households were randomly selected for participation. For this study, data were from waves collected in 9 provinces in 2006, 2009, and 2011 (hereafter referred to as “provinces”). In 2011, 3 autonomous cities, Beijing, Shanghai, and Chongqing, were added to represent China’s megacities, major cities that have developed over time and have ∼20–30 million residents. Because these cities were included in the survey only in 2011, they were included here separately for descriptive, cross-sectional analyses and excluded from the longitudinal analyses. For the cross-sectional analyses, the sample was composed of all children with diet measurements in provinces (2006, n = 1134; 2009, n = 1202; and 2011, n = 1047) and megacities (2011, n = 363).
For the longitudinal analyses, we included any child whose age was 2–13 y in 2006, who participated in the survey in 2006 or 2009, and who had ≥1 follow-up visit (2009, 2011, or both) (54% had 2 follow-up visits and 46% had 3 follow-up visits). We then excluded children with missing BMI (n = 237), for a final analytic sample of 964 children with 2277 observations.
Anthropometric data.
Anthropometric data were collected on every household member at each visit. Height was measured without shoes to the nearest 0.2 cm with the use of a Seca stadiometer. Weight was measured without shoes and in light clothing to the nearest 0.1 kg with the use of a calibrated beam scale. To examine changes in weight status, we used age- and sex-adjusted BMI z scores (38). We also classified children as underweight or overweight/obese at baseline (2006 or 2009) by using the cutoffs established by the International Obesity Task Force (39, 40), which provides age- and sex-specific cutoffs for children.
Dietary intake data.
The methods for collecting household and individual dietary intake data have been described extensively (9). In brief, dietary data were collected over 3 consecutive days with the use of both household inventories of all ingredients, as well as 3 consecutive 24-h dietary recalls. For children <10 y of age, the primary caretaker reported.
The latest Chinese food composition table was used to calculate energy intake (41). To provide comparability to US studies on snacking, the USDA food grouping system was used to classify food groups (42). Fruit included whole fruit (fresh, frozen, dried, and canned).
In this study, a snack referred to any food or drink consumed outside of the 3 main meals (breakfast, lunch, and dinner), whereas a snacker referred to anyone who consumed ≥1 snack during the 3-d dietary recall. For the longitudinal analysis, children were grouped by age group (2–6 compared with 7–13 y of age) into nonsnackers or into tertiles based on absolute calories consumed from snacks (Supplemental Table 1). Children consumed ∼40, 125, and 350 kcal/d in the first, second, and third tertiles, respectively.
Statistical analysis.
All analyses were conducted with the use of Stata version 13.
For provinces, the sample was treated initially as a repeated cross-section, with differences in the sociodemographic composition examined in 2009 and 2011 compared with 2006, with the use of t tests for continuous variables and chi-square tests for categorical variables. Cross-sectional sociodemographic differences between megacities and all other regions in 2011 also were examined. Sociodemographic characteristics included the age and sex of the child, household income (adjusted for inflation), maximum parental education (less than secondary school, graduated from secondary school, and some college or greater), and a continuous measure of urbanicity (43). Physical activity was assessed via questionnaire, and metabolic equivalent tasks were calculated. We then described the percentage of snackers, percentage of consumers of snack food groups, and mean per-consumer daily calories from snacks across time and between megacities and all other regions in 2011.
For the longitudinal analysis, linear mixed-effects models were used to examine the association between snacking and BMI z score over time. The primary exposure, snacking, and potential confounders were treated as fixed effects, and included individual random slopes and intercepts to permit individual variability over time. To reflect developments in eating behavior and the food environment as children age, all analyses were stratified by age at baseline (2–6 and 7–13 y of age). Modeling snacking as total calories from snacks allowed snacks to affect total energy, presumably thereby affecting weight change. Snacking was included in models as an indicator variable for nonsnacker and each tertile of snacker. We tested whether snacking influenced BMI z score over time by including an interaction term for snacking and time. We also tested whether the association between snacking and BMI z score was different for underweight compared with normal-weight compared with overweight/obese children by including a 3-way interaction between snacking, weight status at baseline, and time. To control for diet quality of the remainder of the diet, all models controlled for the percentage of energy from food groups consumed at meals. In additional models, we also tested whether controlling for total energy changed the association between snacking and BMI in order to determine whether snacking influenced BMI outside of its contribution to total energy (in other words, whether the type of eating occasion mattered).
Stata’s margin command was used to predict the mean adjusted BMI z score by baseline weight status and snacking for each survey year. To test for statistical significance over time, pairwise contrasts were performed within baseline weight status and snacking to compare mean BMI z score in 2009 and 2011 to that in 2006 (P < 0.05). Joint contrasts to test the statistical significance of the interaction terms also were performed (P < 0.10).
All models controlled for urbanicity, sex, and parental education. Physical activity was not associated with either BMI z score or snacking in bivariate regression, likely because of the homogenous and low levels of physical activity in nonmegacity participants, and subsequently was excluded from analytic models. Sensitivity analyses revealed that results were robust to inclusion of physical activity.
Results
Characteristics of the sample.
In children in provinces, urbanicity and household income increased over time, as did physical activity, although physical activity was low across time points (Table 1). In 2011, children in megacities had higher household income and parental education, as well as higher physical activity (P < 0.05), than did children in provinces. For children in provinces, mean BMI z score decreased over time, and, in 2011, children in megacities had higher mean BMI z scores (P < 0.05), in addition to a higher proportion of obesity and lower proportion of underweight.
TABLE 1.
2011 |
||||
2006: 9 provinces (n = 1134) | 2009: 9 provinces (n = 1202) | 9 provinces (n = 1047) | 3 megacities (n = 363) | |
Female | 46 | 45 | 48 | 50 |
Age, y | 7.9 ± 0.1 | 10.4 ± 0.1* | 11.8 ± 0.1* | 12.3 ± 0.2** |
Urbanicity index | 59.8 ± 0.6 | 63.7 ± 0.5* | 67.2 ± 0.6* | 87.9 ± 0.6** |
Household income, 2009 yuan | 6352 ± 265 | 9007 ± 269* | 10,305 ± 389* | 16,122 ± 722** |
Parental education | ||||
Less than secondary school | 62 | 62 | 61 | 25** |
Graduated from secondary school | 28 | 29 | 29 | 32 |
Some college or greater | 9 | 10 | 10 | 43** |
Physical activity, METs2/wk | 36.1 ± 1.5 | 46.0 ± 1.8* | 48.0 ± 1.8* | 55.2 ± 3.2** |
Mean BMI-for-age z score3 | −0.05 ± 0.04 | −0.26 ± 0.04* | −0.22 ± 0.04* | 0.33 ± 0.07** |
Underweight | 21 | 23 | 23 | 10** |
Normal weight | 64 | 64 | 63 | 65 |
Overweight/obese | 15 | 13 | 14 | 24** |
Consumers of snacks | 39 | 53* | 63* | 80** |
Per-capita energy from snacking, kcal/d | 67 ± 4.8 | 94 ± 4.5* | 102 ± 4.6* | 183 ± 11.0** |
Per-consumer energy from snacking, kcal/d | 174 ± 10.6 | 179 ± 7.0 | 163 ± 6.3 | 231 ± 12.4** |
Values are means ± SEs (continuous variables) or percentages. Snacking is defined as having reported consuming ≥1 snack over 3 d. Provinces are treated as repeated cross-sectional (2006, 2009, and 2011) and megacities are treated as cross-sectional (2011 only). *Percentage or mean is different in 2009 or 2011 relative to 2006 (for provinces sample only) with the use of 2-sample t tests, P < 0.05. **Percentage or mean is different between megacity and provinces (2011 only) with the use of 2-sample t tests, P < 0.05.
MET, metabolic equivalent of task.
From WHO growth standards (38).
Cross-sectional description of snacking.
The percentage of children who snacked ≥1 time over the 3 d of dietary data collection increased from 39% to 63% between 2006 and 2011 (P < 0.05), but per-consumer daily energy from snacking did not change from 2006 to 2011. Children in megacities were more likely to snack (80%) and consumed more calories from snacks than did their provincial counterparts (236 compared with 176 kcal/d; P < 0.05).
Fruit was an increasingly common snack over time (with an increase from 30% of consumers in 2006 to 50% in 2011), and it was also the most common snack in megacities (63%) (Table 2). Condiments and sauces and fats and oils were commonly consumed during snacking occasions over time and across regions, although the calories consumed from fats and oils (11–15 kcal/d) and condiments (<1 kcal/d) were considerably fewer than those from fruit (54–68 kcal/d). Children from megacities consumed substantially more milk and yogurt (with 24% and 20% of consumers, respectively, in 2011) than did children in provinces [7% and 4%, respectively (P < 0.05)].
TABLE 2.
2006 |
2009 |
2011 |
2011 |
|||||||||
Provinces (n = 1134) |
Provinces (n = 1202) |
Provinces (n = 1047) |
Megacities (n = 363) |
|||||||||
Rank | Food group | Consumers, % | Consumer’s energy intake, kcal/d | Food group | Consumers, % | Consumer’s energy intake, kcal/d | Food group | Consumers, % | Consumer’s energy intake, kcal/d | Food group | Consumers, % | Consumer’s energy intake, kcal/d |
1 | Fruits | 30 | 61 ± 3 | Fats and oils | 39* | 14 ± 1 | Fruits | 50* | 59 ± 2 | Fruits | 63* | 68 ± 3** |
2 | Fats and oils | 30 | 15 ± 1 | Fruits | 38* | 54 ± 2* | Fats and oils | 48* | 11 ± 0.6* | Fats and oils | 60* | 14 ± 1** |
3 | Condiments and sauces | 29 | 1 ± 0 | Condiments and sauces | 37* | 1 ± 0 | Condiments and sauces | 47* | 0 ± 0 | Condiments and sauces | 60* | 1 ± 0** |
4 | Milk | 8 | 101 ± 11 | Milk | 6 | 124 ± 10 | Milk | 7 | 105 ± 18 | Milk | 24* | 90 ± 6 |
5 | Crackers | 4 | 140 ± 19 | Sweet bakery products | 5 | 188 ± 21 | Crackers | 6* | 176 ± 13 | Yogurt | 20* | 70 ± 6 |
6 | Sweet bakery products | 4 | 214 ± 29 | Other desserts | 5* | 48 ± 5* | Sweet bakery products | 6* | 131 ± 12* | Crackers | 14* | 135 ± 13** |
7 | Vegetables, excluding potatoes | 2 | 26 ± 5 | Crackers | 4 | 148 ± 12 | Other desserts | 6* | 52 ± 6* | Nonsoy plant protein | 10* | 106 ± 14 |
8 | Yogurt | 2 | 133 ± 30 | Breads, rolls, and tortillas | 4* | 160 ± 21* | Savory snacks | 4* | 162 ± 12 | Sweet bakery products | 9* | 141 ± 14 |
9 | Cured meats/poultry | 2 | 92 ± 15 | Yogurt | 3 | 67 ± 7* | Yogurt | 4* | 87 ± 8 | Candy | 9* | 76 ± 14 |
10 | Sweetened beverages | 2 | 63 ± 13 | Nonsoy plant protein | 3* | 93 ± 13 | Sweetened beverages | 4* | 53 ± 8 | Breads, rolls, and tortillas | 6* | 103 ± 12 |
11 | Cooked grains | 2 | 242 ± 45 | Dairy drinks and substitutes | 3* | 76 ± 10 | Dairy drinks and substitutes | 4* | 80 ± 11 | Savory snacks | 6 | 182 ± 35 |
12 | Nonsoy plant protein | 2 | 72 ± 15 | Cooked grains | 3* | 206 ± 23 | Nonsoy plant protein | 3* | 98 ± 18 | Sweetened beverages | 6 | 69 ± 14 |
13 | Other desserts | 2 | 26 ± 4 | Mixed dishes—Asian | 3* | 177 ± 24* | Breads, rolls, and tortillas | 3* | 113 ± 13 | 100% juice | 4 | 103 ± 42 |
14 | Dairy drinks and substitutes | 1 | 106 ± 39 | Vegetables, excluding potatoes | 3 | 37 ± 11 | 100% juice | 3* | 92 ± 14* | Other desserts | 4 | 42 ± 10 |
15 | Breads, rolls, and tortillas | 1 | 94 ± 17 | Sweetened beverages | 2 | 51 ± 6 | Cooked grains | 2 | 120 ± 10* | Dairy drinks and substitutes | 3 | 33 ± 6** |
16 | Savory snacks | 1 | 253 ± 108 | 100% juice | 2* | 95 ± 17* | Candy | 2* | 108 ± 22 | Cooked grains | 2 | 106 ± 15 |
17 | Candy | 1 | 192 ± 143 | Candy | 2* | 62 ± 11 | Tea | 2* | 2 ± 0.2 | Mixed dishes—Asian | 2 | 98 ± 19 |
18 | 100% juice | 1 | 31 ± 12 | Savory snacks | 2* | 159 ± 28 | Vegetables, excluding potatoes | 1 | 23 ± 6 | Eggs | 2* | 31 ± 5 |
19 | Infant formulas | 1 | 236 ± 66 | Cured meats/poultry | 2 | 103 ± 19 | Cured meats/poultry | 1 | 88 ± 23 | Tea | 2 | 19 ± 10 |
20 | White potatoes | 1 | 66 ± 20 | Cooked cereals | 1* | 159 ± 31 | Flavored or enhanced water | 1* | 38 ± 5 | Quick breads and bread products | 2 | 150 ± 27 |
Values are means ± SEs unless otherwise indicated. *Percentage or mean is different in 2009 or 2011 relative to 2006 (for ongoing sample only) with the use of 2-sample t tests or chi-square, P < 0.05. **Percentage or mean is different between megacity and province sample (2011 only) with the use of 2-sample t tests or chi-square, P < 0.05.
The percentage of consumers of sweetened beverages, crackers, sweet bakery products, other desserts, and savory snacks was low, but all increased over time. Among consumers, snack calories from sweet bakery products and savory snacks decreased, whereas calories from crackers increased and calories from sweetened beverages remained unchanged. Children in megacities were significantly more likely to consume crackers, sweetened bakery products, and candy than were children in provinces in 2011 (14% compared with 9%, 9% compared with 6%, and 6% compared with 2%, respectively; P < 0.05), as well as more nonsoy plant protein [10% compared with 3% (P < 0.05)]. Among consumers, children from megacities tended to consume calories from snack food groups that were similar to those in provinces, with the exception of more calories from fruit and fats/oils and fewer calories from crackers and dairy drinks/substitutes.
Longitudinal association between snacking and BMI z score.
Results for adjusted predicted changes in BMI z score from models that controlled for types of foods consumed at meals and sociodemographic characteristics, but not total energy intake, are shown in Figure 1A. Among underweight children aged 2–6 y at baseline, being in the top tertiles of snacking was associated with the greatest mean increases in BMI z score from 2006 to 2011 (+55% and +71% increases for the second and third tertiles, respectively, P < 0.05 for contrast between years). Among overweight children aged 2–6 y, all children showed declines in BMI z score over time, but children in the first tertile of snacking showed the largest mean declines [−89% compared with the second tertile (−69%), third tertile (−71%), and nonsnackers (−60%) (P < 0.05 for contrast)]. Among normal-weight 2- to 6-y-old children, nonsnackers showed the only statistically significant decline in BMI z score (−325%) (P < 0.05 for contrast), but in absolute terms, these declines in BMI z score were minor (<0.06 BMI z score–unit difference from 2006 to 2011 across all snacking categories). Results from models controlling for total daily energy were very similar (Supplemental Table 2, Part A).
Among underweight children aged 7–13 y at baseline, children in the first and second tertiles of snacking showed the greatest increases in BMI z score from 2006 (+43% and +51%, respectively; P < 0.05) (Figure 1B). Among overweight children aged 7–13 y, children in the top tertile of snacking showed the greatest declines in BMI z score [−107% relative to nonsnackers (−76%), those in the first tertile (−45%), and those in the second tertile (−60%) (P < 0.05)]. Again, normal-weight children did not show meaningful changes in BMI z score, although snackers in tertile 2 showed significant declines from 2006 to 2011 [−100% (−0.19 in absolute terms)]. Again, results from models controlling for total daily energy were very similar (Supplemental Table 2, Part B).
Discussion
In Chinese children aged 2–13 y, increases in the prevalence of snacking occurred rapidly between 2006 and 2011, increasing by nearly 25% in Chinese provinces. By 2011, snacking had become a predominant dietary behavior. On the other hand, in children from provinces, per-consumer calories from snacking remained consistent at ∼175 kcal/d.
Fruit consumed as snacks remained the most common snack across time, with the majority of those who snacked consuming fruit. At the same time, the intake of beverages as snacks was quite low, with only 7% consuming milk, 4% consuming sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs), and 3% consuming fruit drinks in provinces. Considering that the consumption of fruit during meals was rare (only 2% of children in this sample reported consuming fruit at meals) (data not shown), snacks are an important avenue for promoting fruit intake in this population. Higher fruit intake could also protect against other consequences of the westernizing diet, because fruits are good sources of fiber, which is associated with lower blood pressure, better glycemic control, and prevention of weight gain (44), and they contain important phytochemicals, whose antioxidant activities may prevent inflammation, cancer, and cardiovascular disease (45).
Children in megacities were more likely to snack and also consumed nearly 60 more calories/d from snacks. They were >3 times as likely to consume milk as a snack and 5 times more likely to consume yogurt. This disparity is the result of the rapid expansion of China’s dairy sector, with milk production doubling between 1990 and 2000 along with increasing incomes, especially in urban areas, making dairy widely available in megacities but still relatively scare throughout the rest of China (46). Advertising coupled with the incorporation of government recommendations for milk consumption in its dietary recommendations and the introduction of school milk in several large cities also have played a major role in the increased intake of milk and yogurt (47, 48). Although the intake of crackers, sweet baked goods, candy, snacks, and SSBs remains low even in urban areas, it will be important in the future to monitor changes in these food groups. In a separate study examining processed food intake in China, cross-sectional analyses that attempted to control for selectivity related to processed food intake found that increased processed food intake was linked with a higher BMI and greater risk of overweight in Chinese children 2–18 y of age in 2011 (49). That study suggested a shift in the future in the type of snack foods, especially in more urbanized areas in China.
In this study, we found that, in normal-weight children aged 2–6 y and 7–13 y, snacking was not associated with changes in BMI z score over time; however, in underweight children, snacking was associated with increases in BMI z score, and in overweight children, snacking was associated with larger declines in BMI z score from 2006 to 2011. These findings contradict 2 longitudinal studies of US children by Fields et al. (23) and Phillips et al. (28), who found no relation between snack food consumption and BMI z score in children, with the exception of soda, which was linked to increases in BMI z score in the study by Phillips et al. (28). Yet another longitudinal study of 5- to 12-y-old children in Bogotá, Columbia, found that a snacking pattern composed of high-energy–dense snack-foods such as candy, fried snacks, soda, and other SSBs was linked to an increased BMI z score, but for individual foods, only soda was linked to increased BMI z scores (50). Notably, however, all of these studies measured snack foods such as chips, cake, cookies, and ice cream, rather than the behavior of snacking, or eating outside of the 3-meal pattern. In addition, fruits, rather than high-energy–dense snacks, were by far the most commonly consumed snacks in this population, likely explaining this difference in association.
Results on eating frequency, however, suggest that increased eating frequency is linked to more favorable body composition, even when energy intake is higher. One study of 2372 black and white US girls aged 9–10 y found that lower snack and total eating frequencies were linked to greater 10-y increases in BMI and waist circumference (51). In addition, several cross-sectional studies of children and adolescents in the United States found that more frequent eating or snacking was inversely associated with overweight and abdominal adiposity (29, 52, 53), as well as (in a sample of Hispanic youth) lower fasting insulin, HOMA-IR, and TGs (52).
There is some evidence that more frequent eaters spend more time in physical activity (53), suggesting that increased movement might explain the link between frequent eating and body composition. In this sample, physical activity was low, with little variability, precluding close examination of the snacking–physical activity–obesity link; however, future works should examine whether increased eating frequency is the result of higher physical activity or whether it in part encourages higher activity. For example, one recent randomized controlled trial found that adults who ate breakfast consumed more calories but also increased physical activity, and although eating breakfast was linked to higher energy intake, breakfast eaters also expended more energy throughout the day, creating energy balance (54). In China, as the culture shifts more toward snacking, it may be increasingly important to couple messages around food and snacks with promotions of physical activity.
The robustness of our results to controlling for total energy suggests that the predominant pathway for snacking to affect BMI z score may not be through energy balance (55). In fact, we saw that increased snack intake was associated with overall higher energy, yet overweight snackers still lost weight and underweight snackers gained more. Some evidence suggests that frequent eating increases hormonal signals that suppress appetite, delay gastric emptying, and increase satiety (56–60), which could affect how much or what types of foods children eat, subsequently influencing lipogenesis. For example, it may be that without snacks, children would consume more energy at each eating occasion. Eating a higher number of calories or excess carbohydrate or fat at a given eating occasion can contribute to increased TGs (61). Lower energy density also has been linked to a decrease in ghrelin (a hunger-stimulating hormone) and an increase in peptide YY (a satiety-promoting hormone) (62). Because fruit was the predominant snack, it could be that this helps overweight children control their appetite across the day while they are losing weight. Less clear is how snacking would promote increased weight gain in underweight children through some pathway other than energy.
One limitation of this study is that we looked at intake of calories from snacks, rather than the timing or frequency of eating occasions, because of lack of information about when eating occasions took place. These results permitted us to examine whether eating outside of meals contributed to BMI z score over time, but did not tell us whether some snacking occasions were advantageous, whereas others may have been less so (for example, nighttime snacking). We also combined the effect of amount consumed from snacks overall compared with number of snacks, and because so few children consumed snacks other than fruit, we were unable to explore the differential effect of different types of snack foods (i.e., high-energy–dense snacks compared with fruits). Future work should consider what types of patterns (i.e., timing, frequency, type, and amount) are linked to the most advantageous weight outcomes.
In addition, we cannot rule out the possibility that the effects of the behavioral choice to snack may be affected by baseline weight status and weight gain or loss over time. For example, both younger and older children who were overweight at baseline and who were in the first tertile of snacking had the highest mean BMI z score within that weight category. Thus, these children may have been eating a certain amount of snacks as an attempt to lose weight. Similarly, children who were the most underweight to begin with may have been encouraged to snack more as part of an overall effort to gain weight. Ideally, a randomized trial would be conducted in order to establish a causal link between snacking frequency, amount and type of snack, and weight trajectories in youth.
However, to our knowledge, this study was the first to explore the longitudinal association between snacking, a prevalent and increasing dietary behavior, and weight status in Chinese children. Additional strengths included the use of objectively measured weight and height, very detailed dietary intake data collected over 3 d, and a mixed-effects design that allowed us to examine the longitudinal effects of snacking on weight while controlling for important dietary and contextual confounders.
In conclusion, snacking is highly prevalent in Chinese children in provinces and megacities, and the majority of children in 2011 were snackers. Fruit remains the most common snack. Children in megacities were more likely to consume snacks and consumed more calories per day from snacks, including from dairy products such as milk and yogurt. Snacking did not contribute to changes in BMI z score in normal-weight children aged 2–6 y and 7–13 y, but snacking was associated with declines in BMI z score in overweight/obese Chinese children and increases in BMI z score in underweight children. One question for future exploration is whether, as China continues its nutrition transition, high-energy–dense snacks such as sugary beverages, cookies, chips, and cakes will become more common, and, if so, whether these higher-energy–dense snacks are actually problematic for appropriate weight gain in Chinese children and adolescents.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank Phil Bardsley for excellent data management and programming assistance. LST was responsible for the study design, statistical analysis, interpretation of results, and the drafting and editing of the manuscript; DW and BMP assisted with the study design, interpreting results, and editing the manuscript; and BMP had primary responsibility for the final content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
References
- 1.Gordon-Larsen P, Wang H, Popkin BM. Overweight dynamics in Chinese children and adults. Obes Rev 2014;15 Suppl 137–48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Popkin BM, Conde W, Hou N, Monteiro C. Is there a lag globally in overweight trends for children compared with adults? Obesity (Silver Spring) 2006;14:1846–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Piernas C, Wang D, Du S, Zhang B, Wang Z, Su C, Popkin B. The double burden of under-and overnutrition and nutrient adequacy among Chinese preschool and school-aged children in 2009–2011. Eur J Clin Nutr 2015; in press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Seo DC, Niu J. Trends in underweight and overweight/obesity prevalence in Chinese youth, 2004–2009. Int J Behav Med 2014;21:682–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Tudor-Locke C, Ainsworth BE, Adair LS, Du S, Lee N, Popkin BM. Cross-sectional comparison of physical activity and inactivity patterns in Chinese and Filipino youth. Child Care Health Dev 2007;33:59–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Tudor-Locke C, Ainsworth BE, Adair LS, Du S, Popkin BM. Physical activity and inactivity in Chinese school-aged youth: the China Health and Nutrition Survey. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2003;27:1093–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Jing JE. Feeding China's little emperors: food, children, and social change. Stanford (CA): Stanford University Press; 2000. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Yang J. China’s one-child policy and overweight children in the 1990s. Soc Sci Med 2007;64:2043–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zhai FY, Du SF, Wang ZH, Zhang JG, Du WW, Popkin BM. Dynamics of the Chinese diet and the role of urbanicity, 1991–2011. Obes Rev 2014;15:16–26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wang Z, Zhai F, Du S, Popkin B. Dynamic shifts in Chinese eating behaviors. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 2008;17:123–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zhou Y, Du S, Su C, Zhang B, Wang H, Popkin BM. The food retail revolution in China and its association with diet and health. Food Policy 2015;55:92–100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wang Z, Zhai F, Zhang B, Popkin BM. Trends in Chinese snacking behaviors and patterns and the social-demographic role between 1991 and 2009. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 2012;21:253. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Adair LS, Popkin BM. Are child eating patterns being transformed globally? Obes Res 2012;13:1281–99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mendez MA, Popkin BM. Globalization, urbanization, and nutritional change in the developing world. Electronic Journal of Agricultural and Development Economics 2005;1:220–41. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Popkin B, Bisgrove EZ. Urbanization and nutrition in low-income countries. Food Nutr Bull 1988;10:3–23. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Popkin BM. Urbanization, lifestyle changes and the nutrition transition. World Dev 1999;27:1905–16. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Popkin BM. Nutrition, agriculture and the global food system in low and middle income countries. Food Policy 2014;47:91–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Zhang QF, Pan Z. The transformation of urban vegetable retail in china: wet markets, supermarkets and informal markets in Shanghai. J Contemp Asia 2013;43:497–518. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Guo X, Zheng L, Li Y, Yu S, Sun G, Yang H, Zhou X, Zhang X, Sun Z, Sun Y. Differences in lifestyle behaviors, dietary habits, and familial factors among normal-weight, overweight, and obese Chinese children and adolescents. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2012;9:120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Evans EW, Jacques PF, Dallal GE, Sacheck J, Must A. The role of eating frequency on total energy intake and diet quality in a low-income, racially diverse sample of schoolchildren. Public Health Nutr 2015;18:474–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Duffey KJ, Popkin BM. Causes of increased energy intake among children in the U.S., 1977–2010. Am J Prev Med 2013;44:e1–e8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Evans EW, Jacques PF, Dallal GE, Sacheck J, Must A. The role of eating frequency on relative weight in urban school-age children. Pediatr Obes 2015;10:442–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Field AE, Austin SB, Gillman MW, Rosner B, Rockett HR, Colditz GA. Snack food intake does not predict weight change among children and adolescents. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2004;28:1210–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Nicklas TA, Morales M, Linares A, Yang S-J, Baranowski T, De Moor C, Berenson G. Children’s meal patterns have changed over a 21-year period: the Bogalusa Heart Study. J Am Diet Assoc 2004;104:753–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Huang TTK, Howarth NC, Lin BH, Roberts SB, McCrory MA. Energy intake and meal portions: associations with BMI percentile in US children. Obes Res 2004;12:1875–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Fisher JO, Birch LL. Eating in the absence of hunger and overweight in girls from 5 to 7 y of age. Am J Clin Nutr 2002;76:226–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Nicklas TA, Yang S-J, Baranowski T, Zakeri I, Berenson G. Eating patterns and obesity in children: the Bogalusa Heart Study. Am J Prev Med 2003;25:9–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Phillips SM, Bandini LG, Naumova EN, Cyr H, Colclough S, Dietz WH, Must A. Energy‐dense snack food intake in adolescence: longitudinal relationship to weight and fatness. Obes Res 2004;12:461–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Keast DR, Nicklas TA, O’Neil CE. Snacking is associated with reduced risk of overweight and reduced abdominal obesity in adolescents: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999–2004. Am J Clin Nutr 2010;92:428–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Fabry P, Hejda S, Černý K, Ošancová K, Pechar J, Zvolankova K. Effect of meal frequency in schoolchildren changes in weight-height proportion and skinfold thickness. Am J Clin Nutr 1966;18:358–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Toschke AM, Thorsteinsdottir KH, von Kries R. Meal frequency, breakfast consumption and childhood obesity. Int J Pediatr Obes 2009;4:242–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ovaskainen ML, Reinivuo H, Tapanainen H, Hannila M, Korhonen T, Pakkala H. Snacks as an element of energy intake and food consumption. Eur J Clin Nutr 2006;60:494–501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Adler NE, Boyce T, Chesney MA, Cohen S, Folkman S, Kahn RL, Syme SL. Socioeconomic status and health: the challenge of the gradient. Am Psychol 1994;49:15–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.McCrory MA, Campbell WW. Effects of eating frequency, snacking, and breakfast skipping on energy regulation: symposium overview. J Nutr 2011;141:144–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Leidy HJ, Campbell WW. The effect of eating frequency on appetite control and food intake: brief synopsis of controlled feeding studies. J Nutr 2011;141:154–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Zhang B, Zhai FY, Du SF, Popkin BM. The China Health and Nutrition Survey, 1989–2011. Obes Rev 2014;15(Suppl1):2–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Popkin BM, Du S, Zhai F, Zhang B. Cohort Profile: The China Health and Nutrition Survey–monitoring and understanding socio-economic and health change in China, 1989–2011. Int J Epidemiol 2010;39:1435–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.World Health Organization [Internet]. Child growth standards: BMI-for-age. 2015 [cited 2015 Jun 1]. Available from: http://www.who.int/childgrowth/standards/bmi_for_age/en/.
- 39.Cole TJ, Bellizzi MC, Flegal KM, Dietz WH. Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey. BMJ 2000;320:1240–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Cole TJ, Lobstein T. Extended international (IOTF) body mass index cut‐offs for thinness, overweight and obesity. Pediatr Obes 2012;7:284–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Yang Y, Wang G, Pan X. China food composition 2002. Beijing (China): Peking University Medical Press; 2002. [Google Scholar]
- 42. US Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service. What we eat in America food categories 2011-2012 [Internet]. [cited 2015 Jul 1]. Available from: http://www.ars.usda.gov/SP2UserFiles/Place/80400530/pdf/1112/food_category_list.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Jones-Smith JC, Popkin BM. Understanding community context and adult health changes in China: development of an urbanicity scale. Soc Sci Med 2010;71:1436–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Anderson JW, Smith BM, Gustafson NJ. Health benefits and practical aspects of high-fiber diets. Am J Clin Nutr 1994;59:1242S–7S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Liu RH. Health benefits of fruit and vegetables are from additive and synergistic combinations of phytochemicals. Am J Clin Nutr 2003;78:517S–20S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Fuller F, Beghin JC, Rozelle S. Urban demand for dairy products in China: evidence from new survey data. Ames (IA): Center for Agricultural and Rural Development, Iowa State University; 2004. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Fuller F, Beghin JC, Hu D, Rozelle S. China's dairy market: consumer demand survey and supply characteristics. Ames (IA): Center for Agricultural and Rural Development, Iowa State University; 2004. [Google Scholar]
- 48.Fuller F, Huang J, Ma H, Rozelle S. Got milk? The rapid rise of China’s dairy sector and its future prospects. Food Policy 2006;31:201–15. [Google Scholar]
- 49.Zhou Y, Du S, Su C, Zhang B, Wang H, Popkin BM. The food retail revolution in China and its association with diet and health. Food Policy. In press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Shroff MR, Perng W, Baylin A, Mora-Plazas M, Marin C, Villamor E. Adherence to a snacking dietary pattern and soda intake are related to the development of adiposity: a prospective study in school-age children. Public Health Nutr 2014;17:1507–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Ritchie LD. Less frequent eating predicts greater BMI and waist circumference in female adolescents. Am J Clin Nutr 2012;95:290–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.House BT, Shearrer GE, Miller SJ, Pasch KE, Goran MI, Davis JN. Increased eating frequency linked to decreased obesity and improved metabolic outcomes. Int J Obes 2015;39:136–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Zerva A, Nassis GP, Krekoukia M, Psarra G, Sidossis LS. Effect of eating frequency on body composition in 9–11-year-old children. Int J Sports Med 2007;28:265–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Betts JA, Richardson JD, Chowdhury EA, Holman GD, Tsintzas K, Thompson D. The causal role of breakfast in energy balance and health: a randomized controlled trial in lean adults. Am J Clin Nutr 2014;100:539–47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Popkin BM, Duffey KJ. Does hunger and satiety drive eating anymore? Increasing eating occasions and decreasing time between eating occasions in the United States. Am J Clin Nutr 2010;91:1342–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Speechly D, Buffenstein R. Greater appetite control associated with an increased frequency of eating in lean males. Appetite 1999;33:285–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Stote KS, Baer DJ, Spears K, Paul DR, Harris GK, Rumpler WV, Strycula P, Najjar SS, Ferrucci L, Ingram DK. A controlled trial of reduced meal frequency without caloric restriction in healthy, normal-weight, middle-aged adults. Am J Clin Nutr 2007;85:981–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Bachman JL, Raynor HA. Effects of manipulating eating frequency during a behavioral weight loss intervention: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2012;20:985–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Smeets AJ, Westerterp-Plantenga MS. Acute effects on metabolism and appetite profile of one meal difference in the lower range of meal frequency. Br J Nutr 2008;99:1316–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Jackson SJ, Leahy F, Jebb S, Prentice A, Coward W, Bluck L. Frequent feeding delays the gastric emptying of a subsequent meal. Appetite 2007;48:199–205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Tanofsky-Kraff M, Shomaker LB, Stern EA, Miller R, Sebring N, DellaValle D, Yanovski SZ, Hubbard VS, Yanovski JA. Children’s binge eating and development of metabolic syndrome. Int J Obes (Lond) 2012;36:956–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Kulovitz MG, Kravitz LR, Mermier C, Gibson AL, Conn CA, Kolkmeyer D, Kerksick CM. Potential role of meal frequency as a strategy for weight loss and health in overweight or obese adults. Nutrition 2014;30:386–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.