Skip to main content
PMC home page
Preventive Medicine Reports logoLink to Preventive Medicine Reports
. 2016 Mar 8;3:244–249. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.03.004

Low adherence of Swiss children to national dietary guidelines

L Suzanne Suggs a, Sara Della Bella a, Pedro Marques-Vidal b
PMCID: PMC4929232  PMID: 27419022

Abstract

Introduction

Dietary guidelines aim to inform people of the types of foods and quantities they should consume each day or week to promote and maintain health. The aim of this study was to describe children's dietary behaviors in terms of adherence to the Swiss Society for Nutrition (SSN) dietary guidelines and possible determinants.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted in September 2010 with 568 children aged 6–12 years old living in Ticino Switzerland. Food intake was collected using 7-day food logs. Adherence with the dietary guidelines from the SSN was assessed according to age group.

Results

With the exception of fish and cereal/potato intake (adherence rates of 68.5% and 47.9%, respectively), adherence to SSN guidelines was low: 26.9% for meat; 22.7% for eggs; 10.4% for fruit; 9.5% for sweets, snacks & soft drinks; 3.5% for milk & dairy, and 0% for vegetables. Multivariate analysis showed no consistent association between the child or their parent's socio-demographic characteristics and adherence to SSN guidelines. Girls had a higher likelihood of adhering with fruit and meat guidelines: multivariate adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval) 1.98 (1.10–3.56) and 1.80 (1.08–2.99), respectively. Children aged 10 to 12 had a lower likelihood of adhering with cereals and potatoes 0.48 (0.29–0.78), and a higher likelihood of adhering with the guideline for eggs 1.78 (1.00–3.15).

Conclusion

Dietary intake of Ticinese children shows poor adherence with SSN guidelines. Given the lack of specific socio-demographic factors associated with adherence, population-wide interventions to improve dietary intake are necessary.

Keywords: Dietary guidelines, Eating behavior, Children, Guideline adherence, Epidemiology

Highlights

  • •

    Adherence to dietary guidelines of Swiss children aged 6–12 is low.

  • •

    One out of ten children adheres with fruit intake, none with vegetable intake.

  • •

    (Non)adherence rates are evenly distributed between socio-economic strata.

  • •

    6 to 9 year old children are more likely to meet dairy and cereals guidelines.

  • •

    Overall adherence to guidelines is not significantly associated with a child's BMI.

1. Introduction

Unhealthy diets can lead to high blood pressure, increased blood glucose, elevated blood lipids, and obesity; all intermediate risk factors for cardiovascular diseases. Conversely, diets rich in fruits and vegetables reduce the risks of several non-communicable diseases and cancers (McNaughton et al., 2009, Fernandes et al., 2013, World Cancer Research Fund and American Institute for Cancer R, Anon., n.d; World Health Organization (WHO), 2011). Moreover, there is some evidence of linkages between cognitive functioning, academic performance and children's food intake: excessive intake of saturated fats and simple carbohydrates is adversely associated with several learning and memory processes (Correa-Burrows et al., 2015, Nyaradi et al., 2014, Northstone et al., 2012).

Despite the evidence on the importance of a healthy diet and the consequences of an unhealthy one, the overall quality of diets has declined. There has been a shift from diets high in grains and vegetables to diets rich in fat and sugar and characterized by increased consumption of processed foods (Popkin and Ng, 2007, World Health Organization (WHO), 2007). Eating habits are acquired during childhood (Hu, 2008, Krebs et al., 2007, Birch, 1999, Anzman et al., 2010) and generally endure over one's life (World Health Organization (WHO), 2014). Thus, it is critical that children follow a healthy diet.

Both the Food and Agricultural Organization and the World Health Organization have provided recommendations on energy proteins and nutrient requirement since the 1950s (European Food Safety Authority, 2007). On the contrary, food based dietary guidelines aim to inform people of the types of foods and quantities they should consume, daily and weekly, to promote and maintain health. In Switzerland, the Swiss Society for Nutrition (SSN) has issued food based guidelines for adults and children (Walter et al., 2007). Several studies have shown that adherence with the guidelines is low among Swiss adults (de Abreu et al., 2013, de Abreu et al., 2014, Meier et al., 2010). However, to date, no study has assessed dietary guideline adherence in children.

The aim of this study was to describe children's dietary behaviors in terms of adherence to the SSN 2010 dietary guidelines. Data from a sample of children living in the Italian-speaking canton of Ticino (a heterogeneous state with mountain villages, rural areas and small cities that hosts around 350,000 residents) that were attending public elementary school or first two classes of middle school and who enrolled in the project FAN (Famiglia, Attività fisica, Nutrizione) in 2010 (Suggs et al., 2013) were used.

2. Methods

2.1. Sampling

Data come from the project FAN (Famiglia, Attività fisica, Nutrizione) conducted in September 2010. Details of the project FAN have been described previously (Suggs et al., 2013). Briefly, FAN was an 8-week social marketing program offered free of charge to families in Ticino and promoted through schools. It encouraged and advised children and their parents to eat healthy and get regular physical activity. The data used in this study were collected prior to exposure to the intervention.

2.2. Non-dietary data collection

Through a survey administered to parents of participating children, parents were asked to provide their highest educational degree and their child's height and weight. The child's body mass index (BMI) was calculated and the child was categorized as underweight, healthy weight, overweight and obese according to age and gender-specific criteria from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, that have been previously validated with Swiss children aged 6–12 (Zimmermann et al., 2004).

2.3. Dietary data collection and adherence with dietary guidelines

Food intake of the children was collected using a paper based 7-day food log validated for this population (insert reference after peer-review). For each day of the week, children were asked to write down the foods and beverages they consumed at the main meals (breakfast, lunch and dinner) and between them (morning, afternoon and after dinner). Information about portion size was not collected because of known difficulties in accurate self-report of portion sizes (Livingstone and Robson, 2000, Foster et al., 2009, Collins et al., 2010, Thiagarajah et al., 2008). The 7-day food log was used for several reasons. First, there is no food frequency questionnaire for children available in Ticino. Second, daily logging of food consumption is more accurate than 3–7 day recall reporting. Finally, the instrument was tested with parents and children independently recording what the child ate each day and a high level agreement between parents and children was found (note: data are available upon request).

Coding procedures of the food log was developed in collaboration with a registered dietician and the foods were categorized into fruit; vegetables; milk, probiotics & dairy; sweets, snacks and soft drinks (SSD); cereal & potatoes; eggs; fish; and meat. An example of the foods included in each category is provided in Supplementary Table 1. As dietary guidelines include daily and weekly consumption recommendations, daily consumptions were averaged throughout the week by summing the frequency of consumption of each of the eight food categories from every meal throughout the week and dividing this count by the number of days the child completed the log), while weekly consumptions were obtained by summing the frequency of consumption of each of the eight food categories from every meal. The 2010 SSN recommendations for children are summarized in Supplementary Table 2.

A child was categorized as adhering to the SSN dietary guidelines if their consumption was within the range proposed by SSN for food consumed daily. For instance, according to the SSN guidelines, a child aged 6 should eat three portions of dairy daily. For this analysis, a 6-year old child was considered as adherent to the dairy recommendations if they ate dairy between 2.8 and 3.2 times per day. Fish and fruit over-consumers (eating fish more than once a week or eating fruits more than twice a day) were considered to be adherers, as an overconsumption of these foods was not considered harmful.

2.4. Statistical analyses

Statistical analyses were performed using Stata 13.0 (Stata Corp, College Station, TX, USA). Descriptive results were presented as mean ± standard deviation or as the percent or actual number of participants. Bivariate associations between adherence and several characteristics of the sample were assessed by chi-square or by Fisher's exact test. Multivariable associations were assessed by logistic regression and the results were expressed as odds ratio and (95% confidence interval). Sensitivity analyses were conducted including all data available in the bivariate analysis. All tests were two-sided and statistical significance was assessed for p < 0.05.

2.5. Ethics statement

Study procedures were reviewed by the Canton Ticino Ethics Committee and voted “except” from human research ethics approval in accordance with Swiss law. The recommendations in the Helsinki Declaration were followed and all participants, both children and parents, provided informed consent and voluntarily provided their data.

3. Results

3.1. Characteristics of the participants

Out of the 750 children who enrolled in FAN, 607 children completed the food log in September 2010 and 568 of them (93.6%) had complete data for analysis. Comparison between children with and without complete data showed no major differences, except that children with incomplete data were more often from a non-Swiss family (i.e. from parents without Swiss citizenship) than children with complete data (Supplemental Table 3).

Of the 568 children included, 287 (50.5%) were female and mean age was 8.5 ± 1.9 years. The frequencies of underweight, healthy weight, and overweight/obesity were 10.4%, 72.0% and 17.6%, respectively. The reported parent's education was 26.4% high, 15.5% middle and 58.1% low.

3.2. Adherence with dietary guidelines

The overall rates of adherence with the SSN guidelines were, in descending order, 68.5% for fish; 47.9% for cereals & potatoes; 26.9% for meat; 22.7% for eggs; 10.4% for fruit; 9.5% for SSD; 3.5% for milk & dairy and 0% for vegetables (Table 1). For SSD, all non-adheres were over-consumers, a similar trend being for meat, for which 72.7% were over-consumers. Conversely, for eggs and cereals & potatoes, most non-adheres were under-consumers (71.0% and 51.6%, respectively).

Table 1.

Bivariate analysis of the factors associated with children's adherence to the guidelines of the Swiss society of Nutrition, canton Ticino, 2010, N = 568.

N Fruit Milk & dairy Cereals & potatoes SSD Eggs Fish Meat
All 568 59 (10.4) 20 (3.5) 272 (47.9) 54 (9.5) 129 (22.7) 389 (68.5) 153 (26.9)
Child's data
 Age group (years)
  6 116 18 (15.5) 7 (6.0) 66 (56.9) 8 (6.9) 23 (19.8) 79 (68.1) 32 (27.6)
  7 to 9 271 25 (9.2) 10 (3.7) 135 (49.8) 26 (9.6) 53 (19.6) 185 (68.3) 76 (28.0)
  10 to 12 181 16 (8.8) 3 (1.7) 71 (39.2) 20 (11.1) 53 (29.3) 125 (69.1) 45 (24.9)
 p-Value 0.126 0.123 § 0.008 0.491 0.038 0.979 0.745
 Gender
  Male 281 21 (7.5) 11 (3.9) 139 (49.5) 24 (8.5) 62 (22.1) 188 (66.9) 64 (22.8)
  Female 287 38 (13.2) 9 (3.1) 133 (46.3) 30 (10.5) 67 (23.3) 201 (70.0) 89 (31)
 p-Value 0.024 0.655 § 0.456 0.437 0.716 0.422 0.027
 BMI categories
  Underweight 59 8 (13.6) 1 (1.7) 30 (50.9) 3 (5.1) 14 (23.7) 37 (62.7) 15 (25.4)
  Healthy weight 409 41 (10.0) 14 (3.4) 202 (49.4) 36 (8.8) 96 (23.5) 282 (69) 108(26.4)
  Overweight 67 6 (9.0) 4 (6.0) 28 (41.8) 11 (16.4) 14 (20.9) 49 (73.1) 19 (28.4)
  Obese 33 4 (12.1) 1 (3.0) 12 (36.4) 4 (12.1) 5 (15.2) 21 (63.6) 11 (33.3)
 p-Value 0.763 § 0.590 § 0.343 0.138 0.713 0.576 0.830
Parent's data
 Gender
  Male 77 3 (3.9) 3 (3.9) 39 (50.7) 10 (13.0) 17 (22.1) 46 (59.7) 15 (19.5)
  Female 491 56 (11.4) 17 (3.5) 233 (47.5) 44 (9.0) 112 (22.8) 343 (69.9) 138 (28.1)
 p-Value 0.045 § 0.744 § 0.602 0.263 0.887 0.076 0.113
 BMI categories
  Underweight 34 4 (11.8) 1 (2.9) 20 (58.8) 2 (5.9) 7 (20.6) 25 (73.5) 7 (20.5)
  Healthy weight 364 39 (10.7) 12 (3.3) 169 (46.4) 29 (8.0) 80 (22.0) 250 (68.7) 114 (31.3)
  Overweight 129 16 (12.4) 5 (3.9) 63 (48.8) 17 (13.2) 35 (27.1) 91 (70.5) 21 (16.3)
  Obese 41 0 (0.0) 2 (4.9) 20 (48.8) 6 (14.6) 7 (17.1) 23 (56.1) 11 (26.8)
 p-Value 0.071 § 0.882 § 0.572 0.181 § 0.498 0.311 0.007 §
 Parent's education
  Primary 19 1 (5.3) 1 (5.3) 7 (36.8) 2 (10.5) 2 (10.5) 12 (63.2) 2 (10.5)
  Secondary 356 33 (9.3) 11 (3.1) 166 (46.6) 32 (9.0) 83 (23.3) 250 (70.2) 102 (28.6)
  Tertiary 193 25 (13.0) 8 (4.2) 99 (51.3) 20 (10.4) 44 (22.8) 127 (65.8) 49(25.4)
 p-Value 0.382 § 0.481 § 0.378 0.762 § 0.431 0.499 0.192 §
 Nationality
  Non-Swiss 66 15 (22.7) 5 (7.6) 31 (47.0) 7 (10.6) 9 (13.6) 44 (66.7) 10 (15.2)
  Swiss 502 44 (8.8) 15 (3.0) 241 (48.0) 47 (9.4) 120 (23.9) 345 (68.7) 143 (28.5)
 p-Value < 0.001 0.07 0.874 0.746 0.061 0.735 0.022
Open in a new tab

BMI, body mass index; SSDs, sweets, snacks and soft drinks. Results are expressed as number of participants and (row percentage) of adherers with each food group guideline. Statistical analysis by chi-square or Fisher's exact test (§). No results shown for vegetables as no child in our sample adhered with the guidelines concerning vegetables' intake.

3.3. Factors associated with adherence

The bivariate associations between adherence with the SSD guidelines and the characteristics of the children and their parents are summarized in Table 1. Children aged 10 to 12 had a lower adherence to cereal & potato recommendations and a higher adherence to egg consumption; girls had a higher adherence to fruit and meat guidelines. Children whose parents were Swiss and children whose parents were obese or with a healthy weight had a higher adherence to meat guidelines, but the numbers were rather small. Finally, both children who took part in the FAN project with their mothers and children whose parents were non-Swiss had a higher adherence to fruit guidelines (Table 1).

Most of the findings were reinforced by the multivariate analysis (Table 2a, Table 2b). Regarding the characteristics of children, increasing age was inversely associated with adherence to cereals and potatoes and milk and dairy guidelines, although the last association was borderline significant (p = 0.054); increasing age was also positively associated with adherence to egg consumption. Girls had a higher likelihood of adhering to fruit and meat guidelines. BMI was not significantly associated with the likelihood of adhering with any guidelines except the meat one: obese children seem to have an increase likelihood of adhering with meat guidelines (although this association is only marginally significant) (Table 2a). Regarding the characteristics of parents, children of non-Swiss parents had a lower likelihood of adhering with meat guidelines, but a higher likelihood of adhering with fruit guidelines. Children who took part in the project with their mothers also had a higher likelihood of adhering with fruit guidelines, while no association was found with BMI or educational level of the reporting parent (Table 2b).

Table 2a.

Multivariate analysis of the children-related factors associated with children's adherence to the guidelines of the Swiss Society of Nutrition, Canton Ticino, 2010, N = 568.

Fruit Milk & dairy Cereals & potatoes SSD Eggs Fish Meat
Gender
 Male 1 (ref.) 1 (ref.) 1 (ref.) 1 (ref.) 1 (ref.) 1 (ref.) 1 (ref.)
 Female 1.98
(1.10–3.56)		 0.72
(0.29–1.81)		 0.80
(0.57–1.12)		 1.35
(0.75–2.40)		 1.10
(0.74–1.65)		 1.17
(0.81–1.68)		 1.53
(1.03–2.25)
Age group (years)
 6 1 (ref.) 1 (ref.) 1 (ref.) 1 (ref.) 1 (ref.) 1 (ref.) 1 (ref.)
 7 to 9 0.57
(0.29–1.13)		 0.59
(0.21–1.63)		 0.75
(0.48–1.17)		 1.55
(0.67–3.60)		 1.03
(0.59–1.79)		 1.06
(0.66–1.71)		 1.04
(0.63–1.72)
 10 to 12 0.59
(0.28–1.26)		 0.25
(0.06–1.02)		 0.48
(0.29–0.78)		 1.92
(0.8–4.61)		 1.78
(1.00–3.15)		 1.08
(0.65–1.81)		 0.87
(0.50–1.51)
 p-Value for trend 0.172 0.053 0.003 0.147 0.049 0.764 0.624
BMI categories
 Underweight 1.64
(0.69–3.91)		 0.49
(0.06–3.92)		 1.02
(0.58–1.78)		 0.63
(0.18–2.15)		 1.15
(0.60–2.23)		 0.74
(0.41–1.32)		 0.87
(0.45–1.65)
 Healthy weight 1 (ref.) 1 (ref.) 1 (ref.) 1 (ref.) 1 (ref.) 1 (ref.) 1 (ref.)
 Overweight 0.95
(0.37–2.48)		 1.58
(0.48–5.16)		 0.70
(0.41–1.20)		 1.90
(0.89–4.07)		 0.91
(0.48–1.76)		 1.34
(0.74–2.44)		 1.32
(0.72–2.43)
 Obese 1.17
(0.37–3.78)		 0.72
(0.09–5.86)		 0.52
(0.25–1.11)		 1.30
(0.42–4.02)		 0.58
(0.21–1.59)		 0.86
(0.40–1.83)		 1.96
(0.88–4.37)
 p-Value for trend 0.975 0.722 0.096 0.258 0.239 0.606 0.064
Open in a new tab

BMI, body mass index; SSDs, sweets, snacks and soft drinks; NA; not assessed. For each food group guideline, results are expressed as odds ratio and (95% confidence interval). Statistical analysis by logistic regression adjusting for all variables in the table. Analysis not performed on vegetables, as no child adhered with the guidelines concerning vegetables.

Table 2b.

Multivariate analysis of the parent's-related factors associated with children's adherence to the guidelines of the Swiss Society of Nutrition, Canton Ticino, 2010, N = 568.

Fruit Milk & dairy Cereals & potatoes SSD Eggs Fish Meat
Gender
 Male 1 (ref.) 1 (ref.) 1 (ref.) 1 (ref.) 1 (ref.) 1 (ref.) 1 (ref.)
 Female 3.85
(1.10–13.4)		 0.86
(0.22–3.32)		 0.94
(0.56–1.57)		 0.82
(0.37–1.82)		 1.23
(0.66–2.29)		 1.57
(0.92–2.67)		 1.35
(0.71–2.58)
BMI categories
 Underweight 1.05
(0.33–3.30)		 0.88
(0.11–7.29)		 1.49
(0.71–3.11)		 0.87
(0.20–3.90)		 0.93
(0.38–2.25)		 1.33
(0.60–2.99)		 0.59
(0.25–1.43)
 Healthy weight 1 (ref.) 1 (ref.) 1 (ref.) 1 (ref.) 1 (ref.) 1 (ref.) 1 (ref.)
 Overweight 1.55
(0.78–3.08)		 0.99
(0.32–3.09)		 1.13
(0.73–1.74)		 1.63
(0.82–3.25)		 1.51
(0.91–2.49)		 1.15
(0.72–1.85)		 0.40
(0.23–0.70)
 Obese NA 1.25
(0.25–6.34)		 1.26
(0.64–2.48)		 1.73
(0.63–4.73)		 0.90
(0.37–2.19)		 0.57
(0.28–1.12)		 0.80
(0.37–1.07)
 p-Value for trend NA 0.798 0.794 0.349 0.858 0.129 0.416
Education
 Primary 1 (ref.) 1 (ref.) 1 (ref.) 1 (ref.) 1 (ref.) 1 (ref.) 1 (ref.)
 Secondary 1.77
(0.20–15.6)		 0.74
(0.08–6.50)		 1.55
(0.58–4.12)		 0.85
(0.18–4.02)		 2.34
(0.52–10.5)		 1.37
(0.51–3.66)		 3.77
(0.48–29.6)
 Tertiary 2.30
(0.26–20.6)		 0.87
(0.09–8.18)		 1.85
(0.68–5.07)		 1.08
(0.22–5.30)		 2.57
(0.56–11.8)		 1.14
(0.41–3.12)		 3.09
(0.38–24.8)
 p-Value for trend 0.455 0.900 0.230 0.927 0.225 0.806 0.147
Nationality
 Swiss 1 (ref.) 1 (ref.) 1 (ref.) 1 (ref.) 1 (ref.) 1 (ref.) 1 (ref.)
 Non-Swiss 3.44
(1.71–6.92)		 2.60
(0.88–7.67)		 0.98
(0.58–1.66)		 1.04
(0.44–2.44)		 0.50
(0.24–1.05)		 0.94
(0.54–1.64)		 0.43
(0.21–0.87)
Open in a new tab

BMI, body mass index; SSDs, sweets, snacks and soft drinks; NA; not assessed. For each food group guideline, results are expressed as odds ratio and (95% confidence interval). Statistical analysis by logistic regression adjusting for all variables in the table. NA not assessable. Analysis not performed on vegetables as no child adhered with the guidelines concerning vegetables.

3.4. Sensitivity analyses

The results of the sensitivity analysis using all available data are summarized in Supplementary Tables 3 and 4. Neither the overall rates of adherence nor the results of the bivariate analysis changed substantively.

4. Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first study ever conducted in Switzerland assessing adherence with SSN guidelines in school-aged children. Our results demonstrate that adherence levels are low and that consumption of SSD and meat is excessive in this group. Given the importance of consuming a healthy diet in childhood, the results obtained in this study are concerning and will serve as a reference for future descriptive or intervention studies among Swiss school-aged children.

4.1. Adherence with dietary guidelines

Overall, the children in this study displayed low adherence with the SSN dietary guidelines. They consumed too many sweets, snacks and soft drinks and ate too few fruits and vegetables. They did not consume enough dairy and ate too much meat. All in all, they mirror the low adherence to guidelines observed among Swiss adults (de Abreu et al., 2013, Meier et al., 2010).

4.2. Factors associated with adherence

Girls were more likely to meet or exceed recommendations concerning fruit intake and were less likely to exceed the recommended intake of meat. These findings are in agreement with a study of children aged 6–14 in the German part of Switzerland, where boys consumed more meat and less fruit than girls (Aeberli et al., 2007). Boys and girls seem to differ in their food preferences and attitudes towards foods and cultural issues might be at play since some foods are perceived to be more masculine than others (meat vs fruit) (Cooke and Wardle, 2005, Arganini et al., 2012). Another factor that could contribute to gender differences in food choice may stem from girls' concern about weight control: some studies suggest that gender differences are apparent even among children and adolescents, with females more likely to experience higher level of body dissatisfaction and weight concerns (Arganini et al., 2012, Lowes and Tiggemann, 2003, Johnson and Wardle, 2005, Mendes et al., 2014, Furnham et al., 2002). Moreover, females have been shown to be more health conscious and possess better health-related nutrition knowledge (Baker and Wardle, 2003, Pirouznia, 2001, Wardle et al., 2000).

Younger (i.e. 6-year old) children showed a better adherence to dietary guidelines for fruits and cereals & potatoes. Conversely, older (10–12 years old) children were more likely to meet the guidelines for egg intake. Some studies suggest that “older” children (i.e. adolescents) have a less healthy diet because of lower parental control, increased peer pressures and autonomy in the choice of food (Birch et al., 2007, Gidding, 2005). However, other studies showed a non-linear association between age and food preferences (Cooke and Wardle, 2005), suggesting that among pre-school children the younger children are more affected by peer pressure than the older ones (Birch, 1980) and that younger adolescents are more susceptible to peer influence and hence tend to have a worse diet (Nørgaard et al., 2013).

No association was found between child or parent BMI status and adherence to most of the SSN dietary guidelines. The only exception is meat, for which there is a positive association between being obese and adhering to the guidelines, although this association is only marginally significant and we need to be very cautious in interpreting these findings in that reverse causality might partly account for them. These findings are not consistent with a recent study of 6 to 14-year-old children living in the German part of Switzerland that found that overweight children had a higher intake of meat and protein (Aeberli et al., 2007). Further, many studies that compared the food intake of obese and non-obese children reported mixed findings (Krebs et al., 2007, Field et al., 2003, Ludwig et al., 2001, Bradlee et al., 2010, Lahti-Koski et al., 2002). Although a reporting bias cannot be ruled out (i.e. overweight parents or children voluntarily underestimating their meat intake), our results fail to find a consistent association between BMI status and adherence to dietary guidelines.

Many studies have shown that children from lower SES families show less healthy eating behaviors such as skipping breakfast, consuming less fruits and vegetables and more sugar sweetened drinks (Fernández-Alvira et al., 2013, Ahmadi et al., 2015, Adamo and Brett, 2014, Xie et al., 2003). Conversely, higher parental education has been shown to be associated with healthier food choices, higher vegetable consumption and lower intake of sugars and fats (Fernández-Alvira et al., 2013, Ahmadi et al., 2015, Adamo and Brett, 2014, Xie et al., 2003). In this study, no association was found between the education level of the parent and their child's adherence to dietary guidelines. Possible explanations are that parents are unaware of the guidelines regarding healthy eating or tend to be less strict regarding their child's eating behavior. Overall, our results suggest that, in Ticino, the parent's education level is not associated with a healthier dietary intake in children, but further studies are needed to assess the reasons for this absence of association.

Children of migrant parents had a higher likelihood of adhering to guidelines for fruit intake, a finding in agreement with other studies conducted among adults (de Abreu et al., 2013). This finding is likely related to the fact that the majority of migrants in Ticino are of Italian origin, a country with higher fruit consumption per capita than Switzerland (Abreu et al., 2014).

4.3. Importance for public health and prevention efforts

Healthy eating behaviors should be promoted and established during childhood. Our results indicate that children in Ticino consume too many sweets, snacks and soft drinks, too much meat and eat too few fruits and vegetables. Thus, appropriate interventions are needed to curb impending health problems associated with unhealthy eating behaviors.

Many approaches have been implemented around the globe, some with success and others with marginal to no effect. Many interventions target overweight and/or obese children, running the risk of stigmatizing children with “weight problems” thereby missing the opportunity to reinforce good behaviors or focus on a population based norm or healthy eating. Promoting healthy diets requires a combination of interventions at the individual as well as the environmental level. Interventions relying on communication and education are less effective than interventions using more holistic approaches reflecting the social and environmental influences on individual lifestyle choices (Nutbeam, 2000, Merzel and D'Afflitti, 2003). For example, school meal interventions would be of little utility in Ticino, because most children return home for lunch. Social marketing has been shown to effectively intervene at individual, community, environmental and policy levels (Stead et al., 2007a, Stead et al., 2007b, Evans et al., 2010, Wolfenden et al., 2014, Gordon et al., 2006) and as such, a social marketing approach to dietary improvement is warranted.

4.4. Strengths and limitations

This study is characterized by several strengths. This is the first study in Switzerland to assess school-aged children's eating behaviors and their adherence with national dietary guidelines. The sample well resembles Ticino's population and includes children from all BMI categories. It examined children's food and beverage intake using a 7-day log. Food consumption logs have several advantages compared to other dietary assessment methods, including food frequency questionnaires and 24 h-recall, as they are completed in an ongoing basis, not relying on children's ability to recall what they ate 1 day ago, or select only from a list of items. They also provide a better estimate of typical weekly food intake which allows us to overcome day to day variability in eating behaviors (Livingstone and Robson, 2000, Collins et al., 2010, Bingham et al., 1994). Further, they allow assessing adherence to guidelines based on weekly consumptions, something unachievable by 24 h-recalls.

This study also has some limitations. First, it relied on voluntary participation in the FAN project, and it is known that participants in voluntary health related studies tend to be more health conscious than the general population. Hence, it is possible that our results might be biased towards a more positive dietary behavior, and that the true adherence to SSN guidelines in the entire population might be even lower. However, this would place even more urgency in the need to promote healthy eating behaviors among Ticinese children, given the low adherence with guidelines found in our sample. Second, as with all studies using self-reported data, self-reporting errors likely exist. However, this cannot be resolved without more invasive data collection measures, such as direct or video observation or biometric samples. Seasonal variation in food intake could not be accounted for (Ma et al., 2005, Shahar et al., 2001, Rossato et al., 2010) and it is not known if children's adherence to the SSN dietary guidelines varies over the year; although it is unlikely that seasonal variation would considerably change adherence rates. Finally, we acknowledge that the cross-sectional nature of our data limited our analysis and interpretation in that we could not control for potential reverse causation.

5. Conclusion

Children aged 6–12 living in Ticino have a low adherence to the SSN dietary guidelines. Population-based interventions are needed to improve the dietary consumption behavior of Swiss children.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Funding

This study was funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (Ref. n. CR13I3_156385/1). The FAN intervention was funded by the Department of Health and Social Services of Canton Ticino and by Health Promotion Switzerland. The funders had no role in the decision to publish or in the preparation of the manuscript.

Transparency document

Transparency document.

mmc1.pdf (1.2MB, pdf)

Footnotes

The transparency document associated with this article can be found, in online version.

Appendix A

Supplementary data to this article can be found online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.03.004.

Appendix A. Supplementary data

Supplementary tables: Table 1 Food categories; Table 2 The SSN 2010 guidelines: Tables 3 and 4 Results of sensitivity analysis.

mmc2.pdf (401.8KB, pdf)

References

  1. Abreu D., Cardoso I., Gaspoz J.-M., Guessous I., Marques-Vidal P. Trends in dietary intake in Switzerland, 1999 to 2009. Public Health Nutr. 2014;17(3):479–485. doi: 10.1017/S1368980013000207. (Mar.) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adamo K.B., Brett K.E. Parental perceptions and childhood dietary quality. Matern. Child Health J. 2014;18(4):978–995. doi: 10.1007/s10995-013-1326-6. (May) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Aeberli I., Kaspar M., Zimmermann M.B. Dietary intake and physical activity of normal weight and overweight 6 to 14 year old Swiss children. Swiss Med. Wkly. 2007;137(29–30):424–430. doi: 10.4414/smw.2007.11696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ahmadi N., Black J.L., Velazquez C.E., Chapman G.E., Veenstra G. Associations between socio-economic status and school-day dietary intake in a sample of grade 5–8 students in Vancouver, Canada. Public Health Nutr. 2015;18(5):764–773. doi: 10.1017/S1368980014001499. (Apr.) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Anon. Swiss nutrition policy. 2016. http://www.blv.admin.ch/themen/04679/05055/index.html?lang=en [Online]. Available: (Accessed: 04-Jun-2015)
  6. Anzman S.L., Rollins B.Y., Birch L.L. Parental influence on children's early eating environments and obesity risk: implications for prevention. Int. J. Obes. 2010;34(7):1116–1124. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2010.43. (Jul.) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Arganini C., Saba A., Comitato R., Virgili F., Turrini A. Gender differences in food choice and dietary intake in modern western societies. In: Maddock J., editor. Public Health — Social and Behavioral Health. InTech; 2012. [Google Scholar]
  8. Baker A.H., Wardle J. Sex differences in fruit and vegetable intake in older adults. Appetite. 2003;40(3):269–275. doi: 10.1016/s0195-6663(03)00014-x. (Jun.) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bingham S.A., Gill C., Welch A. Comparison of dietary assessment methods in nutritional epidemiology: weighed records v. 24 h recalls, food-frequency questionnaires and estimated-diet records. Br. J. Nutr. 1994;72(4):619–643. doi: 10.1079/bjn19940064. (Oct.) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Birch L.L. Effects of peer models' food choices and eating behaviors on preschoolers' food preferences. Child Dev. 1980;51(2):489–496. (Jun.) [Google Scholar]
  11. Birch L.L. Development of food preferences. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 1999;19(1):41–62. doi: 10.1146/annurev.nutr.19.1.41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Birch L., Savage J.S., Ventura A. Influences on the development of children's eating behaviours: from infancy to adolescence. Can. J. Diet. Pract. Res. 2007;68(1):s1–s56. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Bradlee M.L., Singer M.R., Qureshi M.M., Moore L.L. Food group intake and central obesity among children and adolescents in the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) Public Health Nutr. 2010;13(6):797–805. doi: 10.1017/S1368980009991546. (Jun.) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Collins C.E., Watson J., Burrows T. Measuring dietary intake in children and adolescents in the context of overweight and obesity. Int. J. Obes. 2010;34:1103–1115. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2009.241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Cooke L.J., Wardle J. Age and gender differences in children's food preferences. Br. J. Nutr. 2005;93(5):741–746. doi: 10.1079/bjn20051389. (May) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Correa-Burrows P., Burrows R., Orellana Y., Ivanovic D. The relationship between unhealthy snacking at school and academic outcomes: a population study in Chilean schoolchildren. Public Health Nutr. 2015;18(11):2022–2030. doi: 10.1017/S1368980014002602. (Aug.) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. de Abreu D., Guessous I., Vaucher J. Low compliance with dietary recommendations for food intake among adults. Clin. Nutr. 2013 doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2012.11.022. (Dec.) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. de Abreu D., Guessous I., Gaspoz J.-M., Marques-Vidal P. Compliance with the Swiss Society for Nutrition's dietary recommendations in the population of Geneva, Switzerland: a 10-year trend study (1999–2009) J. Acad. Nutr. Diet. 2014;114(5):774–780. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2013.07.032. (May) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. European Food Safety Authority, editor. Development of Food-based Dietary Guidelines: EFSA Scientific Colloquium Summary Report 5; 21–22 March 2006, Parma, Italy. EFSA; Parma: 2007. [Google Scholar]
  20. Evans W.D., Christoffel K.K., Necheles J.W., Becker A.B. Social marketing as a childhood obesity prevention strategy. Obesity. 2010;18(S1):S23–S26. doi: 10.1038/oby.2009.428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Fernandes J., Arts J., Dimond E., Hirshberg S., Lofgren I.E. Dietary factors are associated with coronary heart disease risk factors in college students. Nutr. Res. 2013;33(8):647–652. doi: 10.1016/j.nutres.2013.05.013. (Aug.) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Fernández-Alvira J.M., Mouratidou T., Bammann K. Parental education and frequency of food consumption in European children: the IDEFICS study. Public Health Nutr. 2013;16(03):487–498. doi: 10.1017/S136898001200290X. (Mar.) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Field A.E., Gillman M.W., Rosner B., Rockett H.R., Colditz G.A. Association between fruit and vegetable intake and change in body mass index among a large sample of children and adolescents in the United States. Int. J. Obes. 2003;27(7):821–826. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802297. (Jul.) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Foster E., Adamson A.J., Anderson A.S., Barton K.L., Wrieden W.L. Estimation of portion size in children's dietary assessment: lessons learnt. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2009;63(S1):S45–S49. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2008.64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Furnham A., Badmin N., Sneade I. Body image dissatisfaction: gender differences in eating attitudes, self-esteem, and reasons for exercise. J. Psychol. 2002;136(6):581–596. doi: 10.1080/00223980209604820. (Nov.) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Gidding S.S. Dietary recommendations for children and adolescents: A guide for practitioners: consensus statement from the American Heart Association: endorsed by the American Academy of Pediatrics. Circulation. 2005;112(13):2061–2075. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.169251. (Sep.) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Gordon R., McDermott L., Stead M., Angus K. The effectiveness of social marketing interventions for health improvement: what's the evidence. Public Health. 2006:1133–1139. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2006.10.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Hu F., editor. Obesity Epidemiology. Oxford University Press; 2008. [Google Scholar]
  29. Johnson F., Wardle J. Dietary restraint, body dissatisfaction, and psychological distress: a prospective analysis. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 2005;114(1):119–125. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.114.1.119. (Feb.) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Krebs N.F., Himes J.H., Jacobson D., Nicklas T.A., Guilday P., Styne D. Assessment of child and adolescent overweight and obesity. Pediatrics. 2007;120:S193–S228. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-2329D. (Supplement, Dec.) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Lahti-Koski M., Pietinen P., Heliövaara M., Vartiainen E. Associations of body mass index and obesity with physical activity, food choices, alcohol intake, and smoking in the 1982–1997 FINRISK Studies. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2002;75(5):809–817. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/75.5.809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Livingstone M.B.E., Robson P.J. Measurement of dietary intake in children. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2000;59(02):279–293. doi: 10.1017/s0029665100000318. (May) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Lowes J., Tiggemann M. Body dissatisfaction, dieting awareness and the impact of parental influence in young children. Br. J. Health Psychol. 2003;8(2):135–147. doi: 10.1348/135910703321649123. (May) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Ludwig D.S., Peterson K.E., Gortmaker S.L. Relation between consumption of sugar-sweetened drinks and childhood obesity: a prospective, observational analysis. Lancet. 2001;357(9255):505–508. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04041-1. (Feb.) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Ma Y., Olendzki B.C., Li W. Seasonal variation in food intake, physical activity, and body weight in a predominantly overweight population. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2005;60(4):519–528. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602346. (Dec.) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. McNaughton S.A., Mishra G.D., Brunner E.J. Food patterns associated with blood lipids are predictive of coronary heart disease: the Whitehall II study. Br. J. Nutr. 2009;102(4):619–624. doi: 10.1017/S0007114509243030. (Aug.) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Meier M., Berchtold A., Akré C., Michaud P.-A., Surís J.-C. Who eats healthily? A population-based study among young Swiss residents. Public Health Nutr. 2010;13(12):2068–2075. doi: 10.1017/S1368980010000947. (Dec.) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Mendes V., Araújo J., Lopes C., Ramos E. Determinants of weight loss dieting among adolescents: a longitudinal analysis. J. Adolesc. Health. 2014;54(3):360–363. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.12.003. (Mar.) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Merzel C., D'Afflitti J. Reconsidering community-based health promotion: promise, performance, and potential. Am. J. Public Health. 2003;93(4):557–574. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.4.557. (Apr.) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Nørgaard Maria Kümpel, Hansen Kathrine Nørgaard, Grunert Klaus G. Peer influence on adolescent snacking. J. Soc. Mark. 2013;3(2):176–194. (Jul.) [Google Scholar]
  41. Northstone K., Joinson C., Emmett P., Ness A., Paus T. Are dietary patterns in childhood associated with IQ at 8 years of age? A population-based cohort study. J. Epidemiol. Community Health. 2012;66(7):624–628. doi: 10.1136/jech.2010.111955. (p. jech.2010.111955, Feb.) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Nutbeam D. Health literacy as a public health goal: a challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century. Health Promot. Int. 2000;15(3):259–267. (Sep.) [Google Scholar]
  43. Nyaradi A., Foster J.K., Hickling S. Prospective associations between dietary patterns and cognitive performance during adolescence. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry. 2014;55(9):1017–1024. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12209. (Sep.) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Pirouznia M. The association between nutrition knowledge and eating behavior in male and female adolescents in the US. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2001;52(2):127–132. doi: 10.1080/713671772. (Mar.) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Popkin B., Ng S.W. The nutrition transition in high- and low-income countries: what are the policy lessons? Agric. Econ. 2007;37:199–211. (Dec.) [Google Scholar]
  46. Rossato S.L., Olinto M.T.A., Henn R.L., dos Anjos L.A., Bressan A.W., Wahrlich V. Seasonal effect on nutrient intake in adults living in Southern Brazil. Cad. Saude Publica. 2010;26(11):2177–2187. doi: 10.1590/s0102-311x2010001100019. (Nov.) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Shahar D.R., Yerushalmi N., Lubin F., Froom P., Shahar A., Kristal-Boneh E. Seasonal variations in dietary intake affect the consistency of dietary assessment. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 2001;17(2):129–133. doi: 10.1023/a:1017542928978. (Feb.) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Stead Martine, Gordon Ross, Angus Kathryn, McDermott Laura. A systematic review of social marketing effectiveness. Health Educ. 2007;107(2):126–191. (Feb.) [Google Scholar]
  49. Stead M., Hastings G., McDermott L. The meaning, effectiveness and future of social marketing. Obes. Rev. 2007;8(Suppl. 1):189–193. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2007.00340.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Suggs L.S., Rangelov N., Rangel Garcia M., Aguirre Sanchez L. FAN — Famiglia, Attività fisica, Nutrizione: Ticino Switzerland's campaign for healthy weight. In: Hastings G., Domegan C., editors. Social Marketing, From Tunes to Symphonies. Routledge; UK: 2013. [Google Scholar]
  51. Thiagarajah K., Fly A.D., Hoelscher D.M. Validating the food behavior questions from the elementary school SPAN questionnaire. J. Nutr. Educ. Behav. 2008;40(5):305–310. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2007.07.004. (Sep.) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Walter P., Infanger E., Mühlemann P. Food pyramid of the Swiss Society for Nutrition. Ann. Nutr. Metab. 2007;51(2):15–20. [Google Scholar]
  53. Wardle J., Parmenter K., Waller J. Nutrition knowledge and food intake. Appetite. 2000;34(3):269–275. doi: 10.1006/appe.1999.0311. (Jun.) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Wolfenden L., Wyse R., Nichols M., Allender S., Millar L., McElduff P. A systematic review and meta-analysis of whole of community interventions to prevent excessive population weight gain. Prev. Med. 2014;62:193–200. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.01.031. (May) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. World Cancer Research Fund, American Institute for Cancer Research . 2007. Food, Nutrition, Physical Activity and the Prevention of Cancer: A Global Perspective. (Washington DC) [Google Scholar]
  56. World Health Organization (WHO) In: The Challenge of Obesity in the WHO European Region and the Strategies for Response: Summary. Branca Francesco, Nikogosian Haik, Lobstein Tim., editors. WHO; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  57. World Health Organization (WHO) 2011. Global Status Report on Noncommunicable Diseases 2010. [Google Scholar]
  58. World Health Organization (WHO) WHO; 2014. WHO | childhood overweight and obesity. (Online, Available: http://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/childhood/en/, Accessed: 22-Oct-2014) [Google Scholar]
  59. Xie B., Gilliland F.D., Li Y.-F., Rockett H.R.H. Effects of ethnicity, family income, and education on dietary intake among adolescents. Prev. Med. 2003;36(1):30–40. doi: 10.1006/pmed.2002.1131. (Jan.) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Zimmermann M.B., Gübeli C., Püntener C., Molinari L. Detection of overweight and obesity in a national sample of 6–12-y-old Swiss children: accuracy and validity of reference values for body mass index from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the International Obesity Task Force. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2004;(137):838–843. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/79.5.838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Transparency document.

mmc1.pdf (1.2MB, pdf)

Supplementary tables: Table 1 Food categories; Table 2 The SSN 2010 guidelines: Tables 3 and 4 Results of sensitivity analysis.

mmc2.pdf (401.8KB, pdf)

Articles from Preventive Medicine Reports are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES