Skip to main content
American Journal of Epidemiology logoLink to American Journal of Epidemiology
. 2016 Jun 7;184(1):7–14. doi: 10.1093/aje/kww006

Associations Between Maternal Pregravid Obesity and Gestational Diabetes and the Timing of Pubarche in Daughters

Ai Kubo *, Assiamira Ferrara, Cecile A Laurent, Gayle C Windham, Louise C Greenspan, Julianna Deardorff, Robert A Hiatt, Charles P Quesenberry, Lawrence H Kushi
PMCID: PMC4929245  PMID: 27268032

Abstract

We investigated whether in utero exposure to maternal pregravid obesity and/or gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) was associated with early puberty in girls. We used data from a longitudinal study of 421 mother-daughter pairs enrolled in an integrated health services organization, Kaiser Permanente Northern California (2005–2012). Girls aged 6–8 years were followed annually through ages 12–14 years. Onset of puberty was assessed using study clinic-based Tanner staging. We examined associations of self-reported pregravid obesity and maternal GDM with timing of the daughter's transition to pubertal maturation stage 2 or above for development of breasts and pubic hair, using accelerated failure time regression models with interval censoring to estimate time ratios and hazard ratios and corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Maternal obesity (pregravid body mass index (BMI; weight (kg)/height (m)2) ≥30) was associated with a daughter's earlier transition to breast and pubic hair stage 2+ in comparison with girls whose mothers had pregravid BMI <25. These associations were attenuated and not statistically significant after adjustment for covariates. Girls whose mothers had both pregravid BMI ≥25 and GDM were at higher risk of an earlier transition to pubic hair stage 2+ than those whose mothers had neither condition (adjusted time ratio = 0.89, 95% confidence interval: 0.83, 0.96; hazard ratio = 2.97, 95% confidence interval: 1.52, 5.83). These findings suggest that exposure to maternal obesity and hyperglycemia places girls at higher risk of earlier pubarche.

Keywords: gestational diabetes, intergenerational disease transmission, life-course epidemiology, obesity, prenatal exposure delayed effects, pubarche, puberty, thelarche


A trend towards earlier onset of puberty has been observed among girls in the United States over the past few decades (1–3). In a 2013 study, Biro et al. (3) found that white girls experienced breast development (thelarche) 4 months earlier than those in a study published only 15 years before (2). In addition, the proportion of 6-year-old African-American girls who had already begun to develop breasts or pubic hair increased 2- to 3-fold (4). Early puberty is associated with adverse health outcomes for girls and women over the life course, including obesity, type 2 diabetes, insulin resistance, metabolic syndrome, polycystic ovarian syndrome, and cancer (5–10).

Early-life determinants of the timing of pubertal maturation are not well known. Sexual developmental events in females involve maturation of the ovaries (gonadarche) and the adrenal gland (adrenarche) through 2 hormonally distinct processes (11). Thelarche (first budding of breasts) is often one of the indications of gonadarche, and pubarche (first appearance of pubic hair) often follows adrenarche. These events are part of a continuum that begins during intrauterine life and extends through the completion of sexual maturation. It is therefore likely that early-life factors play important roles in the programming of sexual maturation, as well as later metabolic patterns. Intrauterine growth retardation and small size for gestational age have been identified as early-life risk factors for premature adrenarche (12, 13). In addition, in a large cohort of adolescent girls, Maisonet et al. (14) recently found that daughters of obese and overweight mothers reported earlier stages of breast development and menarche than daughters of women who had a normal pregravid weight. Other early-life factors such as primiparity, smoking during pregnancy, and rapid weight gain during infancy were also associated with earlier timing of pubertal onset and menarche in that study (14), corroborating results from other studies that have found an association between rapid infant weight gain and earlier onset of menarche (12, 15). These studies indicate the importance of early-life factors influencing the timing of pubertal development in girls.

The incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and the prevalence of obesity among women of reproductive age have increased during the last several decades (13, 16, 17). The adrenal cortex has receptors for insulin and growth factors, and previous studies have suggested that increased levels of insulin in girls may boost androgen production from the adrenal glands, triggering adrenarche (18–21). Daughters of women whose pregnancies were complicated by GDM or obesity are at higher risk of insulin resistance and development of diabetes in the future (22, 23). Since rapid infant weight gain, which appears to be related to earlier pubertal development (12, 14, 15), is a known risk factor for insulin resistance (24, 25), pregnancy obesity and GDM may also influence the timing of puberty onset in the offspring through a similar mechanism. Therefore, we conducted analyses examining the associations between pregravid obesity and GDM in mothers and the timing of thelarche and pubarche in their daughters, using data from a longitudinal study of a multiethnic cohort of girls drawn from the membership of a large integrated health-care delivery system in Northern California.

METHODS

This study was conducted as part of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences/National Cancer Institute Breast Cancer and the Environment Research Program, which included 3 collaborative epidemiologic studies examining environmental and other factors that influence pubertal maturation (26). The present analysis was carried out within one of these prospective cohort studies, the Cohort Study of Young Girls' Nutrition, Environment, and Transitions (CYGNET). CYGNET investigates pubertal maturation in the diverse membership of a health maintenance organization, Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC). Written informed consent and assent were obtained from parent and child participants, respectively, and the study protocol was approved by the Kaiser Permanente Institutional Review Board.

Participants and procedure

The CYGNET investigators recruited 444 girls and their caregivers (96% mothers) from KPNC members in the San Francisco Bay Area, Northern California. The study protocol has been described in detail previously (27). Briefly, girls were enrolled in the study at age 6–7 years at recruitment (a handful were 8 years of age at the time of baseline examination) and were ethnically diverse (see Table 1). Girls were members of the KPNC health-care system at birth (1997–1999) and at recruitment (2005–2006). At each annual study visit (mean duration of follow-up in this analysis was 5.4 years; range, 1–7 years), anthropometric measurements were taken, and pubertal staging for breast and pubic hair development was assessed based on the methods of Biro et al. (1) and Marshall and Tanner (28), using palpation for assessment of breast stage and visual inspection for assessment of pubic hair. Other data, such as information on demographic and lifestyle factors, were collected through annual interviews conducted with caregivers and with the girls themselves when they were old enough to provide their own information (ages 10–14 years).

Table 1.

Baseline Characteristics of Study Participants and Mothers by Maternal Gestational Diabetes Status and Pregravid Body Mass Index, CYGNET, San Francisco, California, 2005–2012

Characteristic GDM Status
Pregravid BMIa
No GDM
GDM
<25.0
25.0–<30
≥30.0
No. % Mean (SD) No. % Mean (SD) No. % Mean (SD) No. % Mean (SD) No. % Mean (SD)
Mother-daughter pairs 390 94 27 6 68 18 104 27 55 214
Girls’ characteristics
 Age, years
  6 93 97 3 3 49 53 24 26 19 21
  7 291 92 24 8 162 56 79 27 48 17
  8 6 100 0 0 3 60 1 20 1 20
 Race/ethnicity
  White 170 94 10 6 118b 70 31 18 20 12
  Asian 47 92 4 8 42 81 9 17 1 2
  Latina 91 91 9 9 32 38 35 42 17 20
  African-American 82 95 4 5 22 27 29 36 30 37
 Tanner stage 2+
  Breast development 28 7 2 7 12 6 8 8 8 12
  Pubic hair 29 8 2 8 9b 4 7 7 10 15
 Girl's BMI
  Normal-weight (<25) 284 95 15 5 171b 61 68 24 40 14
  Overweight (25–<30) 54 90 6 10 27 49 18 33 10 18
  Obese (≥30) 52 90 6 10 16 31 18 35 18 35
 % body fat 18.9 (8.7) 21 (10.5) 17.5b (8.1) 20.0 (9.7) 21.3 (9.5)
 Waist:height ratio 0.49c (0.05) 0.51 (0.05) 0.48b (0.04) 0.49 (0.06) 0.50 (0.06)
 Birth weight, g 3,373 (539) 3,396 (849) 3,335 (546) 3,415 (535) 3,458 (690)
Maternal characteristics
 Age at delivery, years 32.6 (5.9) 33.0 (5.0) 33.4 (5.2) 32.5 (5.8) 30.7 (7.2)
 Education
  High school diploma or less 63c 86 10 14 26b 46 16 29 14 25
  Some college 109 94 7 6 41 37 39 35 30 27
  College degree/university 127 96 5 4 86 67 27 21 16 12
  Postgraduate study 84 94 5 6 57 68 20 24 7 8
 Annual household income
  <$50,000 76 93 6 7 23b 32 24 33 26 36
  ≥$50,000 313 94 21 6 191 61 80 26 41 13

Abbreviations: ANOVA, analysis of variance; BMI, body mass index; CYGNET, Cohort Study of Young Girls' Nutrition, Environment, and Transitions; GDM, gestational diabetes mellitus; SD, standard deviation.

a Weight (kg)/height (m)2.

b P < 0.01 (χ2 test for categorical variables and t test/ANOVA for continuous variables).

c P < 0.05 (χ2 test for categorical variables and t test/ANOVA for continuous variables).

Measurements

Exposure variables

Maternal pregravid body mass index

Maternal pregravid body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight (in kilograms) divided by squared height (in meters) from self-reported prepregnancy weight and height data, obtained from the CYGNET questionnaire completed at enrollment. We categorized women's pregravid BMI as normal-weight (BMI <25.0), overweight (BMI 25.0–<30.0), or obese (BMI ≥30.0).

Maternal GDM

Each girl's medical record was linked to her mother's medical record. In the KPNC system, 96% of pregnancies are screened for GDM using a 50-g, 1-hour oral glucose challenge test (screening test), in accordance with American Diabetes Association recommendations (29). If the screening test result is abnormal, a diagnostic 100-g, 3-hour oral glucose tolerance test is performed. Pregnancy glucose values were obtained from the KPNC GDM registry (13). The validity of plasma glucose results obtained from our laboratory is supported by previously published data (30–33). GDM was defined according to the Carpenter and Coustan thresholds (29) for the diagnostic test, as 2 or more values meeting or exceeding the following plasma glucose cutpoints: fasting glucose 95 mg/dL; 1-hour glucose 180 mg/dL; 2-hour glucose 155 mg/dL; and 3-hour glucose 140 mg/dL.

Outcomes (onset of thelarche and pubarche)

Pubertal maturation staging was assessed by means of the gold-standard method for epidemiologic studies: 5-stage Tanner staging (28) conducted by trained personnel. Research staff were trained and certified for these assessments by a pediatric endocrinologist (L.G.). For this study, onset of breast development and pubic hair development were coded separately for each study visit as “no onset” (stage 1) or “onset” (stage 2 or above).

Covariates

Girl's BMI

The study clinic visit included several anthropometric measurements. Height was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm using a mounted wall stadiometer, with the participant in stocking feet and head in the neutral position. Weight was measured without shoes and in light clothing and was rounded to the nearest 0.5 kg. These measurements were used to calculate BMI, and associated percentiles and z scores were determined for the appropriate age- (and sex-) specific Centers for Disease and Control and Prevention year 2000 standard population distribution. As covariates, we included baseline BMI and BMI immediately prior to puberty onset separately; because the results were similar, we used baseline BMI, since data on this variable were available for a larger number of girls than BMI more proximal to puberty onset.

Other covariates

Girls' and mothers' demographic information and maternal age at menarche were obtained from the CYGNET questionnaires. Girl's race/ethnicity was assessed using the primary caregiver's report at baseline, and was coded into mutually exclusive categories as African-American or black, Hispanic or Latina, Asian, or non-Hispanic white. Girl's birth weight was obtained from the KPNC electronic databases. Caregivers reported annual household income at baseline. Income was dichotomized into “lower” (<$50,000/year) and “higher” (≥$50,000/year) income. Maternal age at menarche was defined categorically as age in years (<12, 12–<13, 13–<14, or ≥14).

Statistical analyses

Analyses of maternal GDM and pregravid obesity in relation to pubarche and thelarche used Weibull regression, which is both an accelerated failure time model and a proportional hazards regression model, with accommodation of left, right, and interval censoring (34). Interval censoring resulted from assessing pubertal stage at study examinations only; the exact time of transition for a girl who was at stage 1 at one examination and at stage 2 at the following examination was unknown.

The time interval in which pubarche or thelarche occurred was defined as falling between the last examination with pubertal assessment of stage 1 (with no previous assessment of stage 2+) and the first examination at pubertal stage 2 or greater. A study participant was considered left-censored if she had already transitioned to stage 2 or higher at the time of baseline examination and right-censored if she had not transitioned by the time of the last examination. Regression analyses provided 2 estimates of association (and 95% confidence intervals) between a covariate and the outcome of time to pubertal onset. The time ratio is interpreted as the ratio of the median (or any other quantile) time-to-event for a given level of a covariate to the referent level. The hazard ratio is interpreted as the risk of transitioning to Tanner breast development stage 2+ or pubic hair stage 2+ (PH2+) for a given level of a covariate compared with the referent level. The associations between maternal GDM and prepregnancy obesity and pubertal onset were examined for breast and pubic hair development in separate analyses, without adjustment as well as with adjustment for known confounders, such as girl's race/ethnicity, mother's age at menarche, and household income.

Effect modification between maternal GDM and obesity was evaluated by including a cross-product term. The mediating roles of girl's BMI and birth weight were tested by comparing the coefficients between models with and without these variables, also adjusting for other confounders mentioned above. If the observed association was attenuated substantially (>10% of the effect estimate) after the inclusion of a potential mediator, this was taken to indicate that the variable may mediate the association (35). All analyses used SAS statistical software, version 9.3 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, North Carolina).

RESULTS

Participant characteristics

Of the 444 participants enrolled at baseline, we excluded 27 mother-daughter pairs who were missing information on GDM status and 58 pairs who were missing data on pregravid BMI. The analyses comparing those pairs that were included with those that were excluded did not demonstrate substantial differences in the distributions of the exposure or outcome variables (data not shown). Table 1 shows the baseline characteristics of these study pairs, stratified by GDM status and pregravid BMI category. Daughters of women whose pregnancies were complicated by GDM were more likely to have a greater waist:height ratio, and their mothers were likely to have lower educational attainment than those without GDM. Daughters of women who had pregravid BMI ≥30 were more likely to be Hispanic or African-American, to have greater BMI and waist:height ratio, and to have transitioned to PH2+ by the time of the baseline examination. Mothers with pregravid obesity were younger, less educated, and of lower income than women without it.

Primary analyses

Associations between pregravid obesity and GDM and onset of thelarche

In crude analyses, daughters of women who were obese prior to pregnancy were more likely to have transitioned to breast development stage 2+ than those with pregravid BMI <25 (Table 2). The corresponding time ratio of 0.96 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.93, 0.99) translates to an approximately 4-month difference in the estimated median age at onset of thelarche between these groups. However, the associations were attenuated and not statistically significant after adjustment for race/ethnicity, household income, and maternal age at menarche. There was no association between maternal GDM and timing of thelarche.

Table 2.

Results From Survival Analysis of the Associations Between Maternal Gestational Diabetes and Pregravid Obesity and Girls' Thelarche (Onset of Breast Development), CYGNET, San Francisco, California, 2005–2012

Variable Unadjusted
Adjusteda
TR 95% CI HR 95% CI TR 95% CI HR 95% CI
Pregravid BMIb
 <25 1.00 Referent 1.00 Referent 1.00 Referent 1.00 Referent
 25–<30 0.98 0.95, 1.01 1.24 0.94, 1.62 0.99 0.96, 1.02 1.15 0.85, 1.56
 ≥30 0.96 0.93, 0.99 1.39 1.02, 1.91 1.00 0.97, 1.04 0.96 0.66, 1.39
  P for trend 0.002 0.002 0.57 0.78
GDM
 No 1.00 Referent 1.00 Referent 1.00 Referent 1.00 Referent
 Yes 1.00 0.95, 1.05 1.01 0.65, 1.57 1.02 0.97, 1.06 0.85 0.54, 1.35

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; CYGNET, Cohort Study of Young Girls' Nutrition, Environment, and Transitions; GDM, gestational diabetes mellitus; HR, hazard ratio; TR, time ratio.

a Adjusted for race/ethnicity, household income, and maternal age at menarche.

b Weight (kg)/height (m)2.

Associations between pregravid obesity and GDM and onset of pubarche

Without adjustment for covariates, girls whose mothers were obese prior to pregnancy had a higher risk of an earlier transition to PH2+ than those whose mothers had pregravid BMI <25 (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.08, 95% CI: 1.53, 2.82). The corresponding time ratio of 0.92 (95% CI: 0.88, 0.95) translates to an approximately 11-month difference in the estimated median age at onset of pubarche between these groups. Daughters of overweight mothers also had a younger age of transition to PH2+ (HR = 1.47, 95% CI: 1.12, 1.93; time ratio = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.92, 0.99 (approximately 7 months earlier)) than those whose mothers had pregravid BMI <25, and there was a dose-effect relationship between pregravid BMI and onset of pubarche (P < 0.0001). However, associations were attenuated and no longer statistically significant after adjustment for race/ethnicity, household income, and maternal age at menarche. There was no association between maternal GDM and onset of pubarche (Table 3).

Table 3.

Results From Survival Analysis of the Associations Between Maternal Gestational Diabetes and Pregravid Obesity and Girls' Puberarche (Onset of Pubic Hair), CYGNET, San Francisco, California, 2005–2012

Variable Unadjusted
Adjusteda
TR 95% CI HR 95% CI TR 95% CI HR 95% CI
Pregravid BMIb
 <25 1.00 Referent 1.00 Referent 1.00 Referent 1.00 Referent
 25–<30 0.95 0.92, 0.99 1.47 1.12, 1.93 0.98 0.95, 1.01 1.20 0.89, 1.62
 ≥30 0.92 0.88, 0.95 2.08 1.53, 2.82 0.97 0.94, 1.01 1.27 0.89, 1.81
  P for trend <0.0001 <0.0001 0.42 0.82
GDM
 No 1.00 Referent 1.00 Referent 1.00 Referent 1.00 Referent
 Yes 0.99 0.93, 1.05 1.09 0.71, 1.70 0.98 0.93, 1.03 1.24 0.79, 1.94

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; CYGNET, Cohort Study of Young Girls' Nutrition, Environment, and Transitions; GDM, gestational diabetes mellitus; HR, hazard ratio; TR, time ratio.

a Adjusted for race/ethnicity, household income, and maternal age at menarche.

b Weight (kg)/height (m)2.

Interaction between pregravid BMI and maternal GDM

Lastly, we evaluated possible interactions between maternal pregravid obesity and GDM (Table 4). The test for interaction suggested a possible interaction for pubarche (P = 0.08) but not thelarche (P = 0.77). After adjustment for race/ethnicity, household income, and maternal age at menarche, there was a significant increase in risk of an earlier transition to PH2+ for girls whose mothers had both GDM and pregravid BMI ≥25 in comparison with the referent group (those with no GDM and with pregravid BMI <25). Those girls on average transitioned to PH2+ substantially earlier than the referent girls (time ratio = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.83, 0.96). The hazard of having transitioned to PH2+ was approximately 3-fold (HR = 2.97, 95% CI: 1.52, 5.83) in this group, compared with the referent group. There was no effect of the association between maternal pregravid obesity and GDM on thelarche in our data.

Table 4.

Adjusteda Results From Survival Analysis of the Combined Effects of Maternal Gestational Diabetes and Pregravid Obesity on Girls' Puberty Onset, CYGNET, San Francisco, California, 2005–2012

BMIb and GDM Status Breast Development
Pubic Hair
TR 95% CI HR 95% CI TR 95% CI HR 95% CI
BMI <25
 No GDM 1.00 Referent 1.00 Referent 1.00 Referent 1.00 Referent
 GDM 0.98 0.91, 1.06 1.22 0.54, 2.74 0.99 0.91, 1.08 1.06 0.48, 2.36
BMI ≥25
 No GDM 0.98 0.96, 1.01 1.18 0.88, 1.57 0.98 0.95, 1.01 1.19 0.90, 1.56
 GDM 1.01 0.94, 1.08 0.93 0.47, 1.85 0.89 0.83, 0.96 2.97 1.52, 5.83

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; CYGNET, Cohort Study of Young Girls' Nutrition, Environment, and Transitions; GDM, gestational diabetes mellitus; HR, hazard ratio; TR, time ratio.

a Adjusted for race/ethnicity, household income, and maternal age at menarche.

b Weight (kg)/height (m)2.

Supplemental analysis

To evaluate whether the effect of the interaction between maternal obesity and GDM on the timing of girl's pubarche was mediated by girl's obesity or birth weight, we conducted analyses including girl's baseline BMI or birth weight as a mediator. Inclusion of girl's BMI (baseline or proximal to pubarche) or birth weight had only a modest impact on the effect estimates. Compared with the group whose mothers were without GDM and had pregravid BMI <25, the hazard ratio for transition to PH2+ among daughters of those with pregravid obesity and GDM was 2.53 (95% CI: 1.27, 5.05) when girl's baseline BMI was included in the model; this finding was somewhat attenuated from that obtained in the model without either girl's BMI or birth weight (HR = 2.97, 95% CI: 1.52, 5.83). When girl's later BMI was included, the results were more similar to those from the model without inclusion of BMI (HR = 2.79, 95% CI: 1.29, 6.01). Similarly, the hazard ratio for the same association including birth weight (HR = 3.16, 95% CI: 1.59, 6.30) was not substantially different from that excluding girl's BMI and birth weight, suggesting that these variables did not fully explain the observed association.

DISCUSSION

In this multiethnic cohort of mother-daughter pairs, we observed that daughters of mothers who had both pregravid obesity and GDM were more likely to experience an earlier transition to PH2+ than girls whose mothers had no GDM and a BMI <25 prior to pregnancy. This association was independent of race/ethnicity, household income, and maternal age at menarche, and it was not explained by girl's BMI or birth weight. Mothers' pregravid obesity or GDM did not appear to influence their daughters' age at onset of thelarche.

Animal and human studies have demonstrated that maternal GDM and obesity lead to persistent changes in offspring metabolism, such as in utero hyperinsulinemia, pancreatic β-cell secretory capacity, abnormal insulin signaling in insulin-sensitive tissues, and abnormal development of the hypothalamus and adrenal gland—all displaying associations with aberrant control of energy regulation and obesity (14, 36–43). Therefore, it is plausible that in utero exposure to GDM and obesity through fetal hyperinsulinemia may alter time to adrenarche. Although our study did not measure premature adrenarche (often determined by a high level of dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate and other adrenal androgens) as an outcome, pubarche, or the appearance of pubic hair, is one of the physical signs of adrenarche. Our results extend previous findings that early-life factors such as intrauterine exposure to maternal obesity probably alter metabolic programming in female offspring, putting them at higher risk of future chronic conditions related to metabolic dysregulation.

Although we hypothesized that in utero exposure to maternal GDM and obesity would also be associated with the timing of thelarche via adiposity in the girls, we did not observe the association after adjustment for other factors known to influence thelarche. It is possible that the underlying metabolic pathways that influence age at onset of pubarche versus thelarche are differentially affected by maternal obesity or GDM. From a methodological perspective, classification of breast development is more difficult to assess than pubic hair, in part because of the influence of adiposity. This may have led to nondifferential misclassification and therefore no association with breast development (35). The observed null finding may also have been due to effect modification by race/ethnicity. We adjusted the results for income and maternal age at menarche to control for hereditary and socioeconomic factors. The strongest attenuation was seen with inclusion of race/ethnicity, suggesting the importance of race/ethnicity's role in both prevalences of pregravid obesity and GDM and girl's pubertal onset. Unfortunately, we did not have enough statistical power to conduct analyses stratified by race/ethnicity, an important variable that has been shown to interact with relationships between prenatal factors and birth outcomes in previous studies (44–46). We did conduct stratified analyses comparing whites with nonwhites and comparing lower household income (<$50,000/year) with higher income (≥$50,000/year). Although neither of these analyses showed differences in the effect estimates between the groups (data not shown), we cannot preclude the possibility of effect modification by race/ethnicity in full-powered studies. Future studies that include diverse and large study populations should examine the role of race/ethnicity to shed more light on the interplay among these important variables.

While our findings represent important additions to the existing evidence regarding the risk factors for early pubarche, they should be interpreted with caution. First, maternal pregravid weight and height were self-reported. However, because of the unique availability of linkage of child medical records with maternal records at KPNC, we were able to compare, in a subgroup, self-reported height and weight data with height and weight recorded during pregnancy (measured at the time of α-fetoprotein testing) in the electronic medical record. The results were similar (for PH2+ analysis comparing pregravid BMI ≥30 with pregravid BMI <25, HR = 1.13 (95% CI: 0.70, 1.83) using self-reported BMI vs. HR = 1.32 (95% CI: 0.83, 2.11) using BMI from medical records), making it unlikely that self-reporting per se biased the results. Second, we did not have information on intrauterine growth retardation, which is known to be associated with timing of pubarche. We did examine the potential mediating roles of birth weight and gestational age, as well as small size for gestational age; however, inclusion of these variables did not change the effect estimates substantially. Lastly, due to the small sample size, we may not have been able to detect significant associations, especially in stratified analyses such as the one shown in Table 4. It is unlikely that we observed a strong association between maternal pregravid obesity and GDM and timing of pubic hair development only by chance. However, these results should be interpreted with caution and be replicated to confirm the associations. These limitations—possible measurement error in pregravid BMI, lack of information on intrauterine growth retardation, and a relatively small sample size—do not influence the major strengths of this study. These strengths include its prospective design, the use of objective glucose measurements to define GDM, and the use of gold-standard assessments of pubertal staging in an ethnically diverse sample. Few studies provide the opportunity to examine these questions in such a data-rich setting.

In summary, in this ethnically diverse study of mother-daughter pairs, maternal pregravid obesity, particularly in the presence of GDM, was found to be a strong risk factor for early onset of pubarche in girls, and the association was not fully mediated by girl's prepubertal obesity or birth weight. A similar association was not seen for thelarche. The concept of windows of susceptibility over the life course provides an important conceptual framework for understanding how prenatal exposures may influence the health of offspring, which may continue over generations. We found an association between in utero exposure to maternal obesity and GDM and the female offspring's metabolic programming, manifested as early onset of pubarche. Our finding suggests that there may be strategies for slowing down the trend toward earlier sexual maturation in girls by designing upstream interventions to manage obesity and hyperglycemia among women who are pregnant or planning to become pregnant.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Author affiliations: Kaiser Permanente Division of Research, Oakland, California (Ai Kubo, Assiamira Ferrara, Cecile A. Laurent, Charles P. Quesenberry, Lawrence H. Kushi); Division of Environmental and Occupational Disease Control, California Department of Public Health, Richmond, California (Gayle C. Windham); Kaiser Permanente San Francisco Medical Center, San Francisco, California (Louise C. Greenspan); Division of Community Health and Human Development, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California (Julianna Deardorff); and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California (Robert A. Hiatt).

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (grants U01ES012801, U01ES019435, K07CA166143, KL2TR000143, and R01DK54834) and the Avon Foundation for Women (New York, New York).

We thank the research staff of the Cohort Study of Young Girls' Nutrition, Environment, and Transitions.

Conflict of interest: none declared.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Biro FM, Galvez MP, Greenspan LC et al. . Pubertal assessment method and baseline characteristics in a mixed longitudinal study of girls. Pediatrics. 2010;1263:e583–e590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Herman-Giddens ME, Slora EJ, Wasserman RC et al. . Secondary sexual characteristics and menses in young girls seen in office practice: a study from the Pediatric Research in Office Settings network. Pediatrics. 1997;994:505–512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Biro FM, Greenspan LC, Galvez MP et al. . Onset of breast development in a longitudinal cohort. Pediatrics. 2013;1326:1019–1027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Biro FM, Deardorff J. Identifying opportunities for cancer prevention during preadolescence and adolescence: puberty as a window of susceptibility. J Adolesc Health. 2013;52(5 suppl):S15–S20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Ibáñez L, Dimartino-Nardi J, Potau N et al. . Premature adrenarche—normal variant or forerunner of adult disease? Endocr Rev. 2000;216:671–696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Kousta E. Premature adrenarche leads to polycystic ovary syndrome? Long-term consequences. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006;1092:148–157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Vuguin P, Grinstein G, Freeman K et al. . Prediction models for insulin resistance in girls with premature adrenarche. The Premature Adrenarche Insulin Resistance score: PAIR score. Horm Res. 2006;654:185–191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Saenger P, Dimartino-Nardi J. Premature adrenarche. J Endocrinol Invest. 2001;249:724–733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Steingraber S. The Falling Age of Puberty in U.S. Girls: What We Know, What We Need to Know. San Francisco, CA: Breast Cancer Fund; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Golub MS, Collman GW, Foster PM et al. . Public health implications of altered puberty timing. Pediatrics. 2008;121(suppl 3):S218–S230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Grumbach M, Styne D. Puberty: ontogeny, neuroendocrinology, physiology, and disorders. In: Larsen PR, Kronenberg HM, Melmed S et al., eds. Williams Textbook of Endocrinology. 10th ed Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders Company; 2002:1115–1286. [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Ong KK, Emmett P, Northstone K et al. . Infancy weight gain predicts childhood body fat and age at menarche in girls. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;945:1527–1532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Ferrara A, Kahn HS, Quesenberry CP et al. . An increase in the incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus: Northern California, 1991–2000. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;1033:526–533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Maisonet M, Christensen KY, Rubin C et al. . Role of prenatal characteristics and early growth on pubertal attainment of British girls. Pediatrics. 2010;1263:e591–e600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Salgin B, Norris SA, Prentice P et al. . Even transient rapid infancy weight gain is associated with higher BMI in young adults and earlier menarche. Int J Obes (Lond). 2015;396:939–944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR et al. . Prevalence of overweight and obesity in the United States, 1999–2004. JAMA. 2006;29513:1549–1555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Kit BK et al. . Prevalence of obesity and trends in the distribution of body mass index among US adults, 1999–2010. JAMA. 2012;3075:491–497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Neville KA, Walker JL. Precocious pubarche is associated with SGA, prematurity, weight gain, and obesity. Arch Dis Child. 2005;903:258–261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Ibáñez L, Potau N, Dunger D et al. . Precocious pubarche in girls and the development of androgen excess. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2000;13(suppl 5):1261–1263. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Ibáñez L, Valls C, Ong K et al. . Metformin therapy during puberty delays menarche, prolongs pubertal growth, and augments adult height: a randomized study in low-birth-weight girls with early-normal onset of puberty. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;916:2068–2073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Remer T, Manz F. Role of nutritional status in the regulation of adrenarche. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;8411:3936–3944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Garcia-Vargas L, Addison SS, Nistala R et al. . Gestational diabetes and the offspring: implications in the development of the cardiorenal metabolic syndrome in offspring. Cardiorenal Med. 2012;22:134–142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Boney CM, Verma A, Tucker R et al. . Metabolic syndrome in childhood: association with birth weight, maternal obesity, and gestational diabetes mellitus. Pediatrics. 2005;1153:e290–e296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Krishnaveni GV, Veena SR, Wills AK et al. . Adiposity, insulin resistance and cardiovascular risk factors in 9–10-year-old Indian children: relationships with birth size and postnatal growth. J Dev Orig Health Dis. 2010;16:403–411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Ibáñez L, Ong K, Dunger DB et al. . Early development of adiposity and insulin resistance after catch-up weight gain in small-for-gestational-age children. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;916:2153–2158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Hiatt RA, Haslam SZ, Osuch J et al. . The Breast Cancer and the Environment Research Centers: transdisciplinary research on the role of the environment in breast cancer etiology. Environ Health Perspect. 2009;11712:1814–1822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Deardorff J, Ekwaru JP, Kushi LH et al. . Father absence, body mass index, and pubertal timing in girls: differential effects by family income and ethnicity. J Adolesc Health. 2011;485:441–447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Marshall WA, Tanner JM. Variations in pattern of pubertal changes in girls. Arch Dis Child. 1969;44235:291–303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. American Diabetes Association. Gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2000;23(suppl 1):S77–S79. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Ferrara A, Hedderson MM, Quesenberry CP et al. . Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus detected by the National Diabetes Data Group or the Carpenter and Coustan plasma glucose thresholds. Diabetes Care. 2002;25:1625–1630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Hedderson MM, Ferrara A, Sacks DA. Gestational diabetes mellitus and lesser degrees of pregnancy hyperglycemia: association with increased risk of spontaneous preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;1024:850–856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Ehrlich SF, Crites YM, Hedderson MM et al. . The risk of large for gestational age across increasing categories of pregnancy glycemia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;2043:240.e1–240.e6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Ferrara A, Weiss NS, Hedderson MM et al. . Pregnancy plasma glucose levels exceeding the American Diabetes Association thresholds, but below the National Diabetes Data Group thresholds for gestational diabetes mellitus, are related to the risk of neonatal macrosomia, hypoglycaemia and hyperbilirubinaemia. Diabetologia. 2007;502:298–306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Hosmer DW Jr, Lemeshow S, May S. Applied Survival Analysis: Regression Modeling of Time-to-Event Data. 2nd ed New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Rothman K, Greenland S, Lash T. Modern Epidemiology. 3rd ed Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Poston L. Developmental programming and diabetes—the human experience and insight from animal models. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;244:541–552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Metzger BE, Lowe LP, Dyer AR et al. . Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2008;35819:1991–2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Fraser A, Tilling K, Macdonald-Wallis C et al. . Association of maternal weight gain in pregnancy with offspring obesity and metabolic and vascular traits in childhood. Circulation. 2010;12123:2557–2564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Boerschmann H, Pflüger M, Henneberger L et al. . Prevalence and predictors of overweight and insulin resistance in offspring of mothers with gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2010;338:1845–1849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Catalano PM, Farrell K, Thomas A et al. . Perinatal risk factors for childhood obesity and metabolic dysregulation. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;905:1303–1313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Herring SJ, Oken E. Obesity and diabetes in mothers and their children: can we stop the intergenerational cycle? Curr Diab Rep. 2011;111:20–27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Moore TR. Fetal exposure to gestational diabetes contributes to subsequent adult metabolic syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;2026:643–649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Reece EA. The fetal and maternal consequences of gestational diabetes mellitus. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010;233:199–203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Bowers K, Laughon SK, Kiely M et al. . Gestational diabetes, pre-pregnancy obesity and pregnancy weight gain in relation to excess fetal growth: variations by race/ethnicity. Diabetologia. 2013;566:1263–1271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Hunt KJ, Marlow NM, Gebregziabher M et al. . Impact of maternal diabetes on birthweight is greater in non-Hispanic blacks than in non-Hispanic whites. Diabetologia. 2012;554:971–980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Sridhar SB, Ferrara A, Ehrlich SF et al. . Risk of large-for-gestational-age newborns in women with gestational diabetes by race and ethnicity and body mass index categories. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;1216:1255–1262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Epidemiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES