Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2016 Jul 1;6:28808. doi: 10.1038/srep28808

Alpha-tubulin enhanced renal tubular cell proliferation and tissue repair but reduced cell death and cell-crystal adhesion

Juthatip Manissorn 1, Supaporn Khamchun 1, Arada Vinaiphat 1, Visith Thongboonkerd 1,a
PMCID: PMC4929438  PMID: 27363348

Abstract

Adhesion of calcium oxalate (CaOx) crystals on renal tubular epithelial cells is a critical event for kidney stone disease that triggers many cascades of cellular response. Our previous expression proteomics study identified several altered proteins in MDCK renal tubular cells induced by CaOx crystals. However, functional significance of those changes had not been investigated. The present study thus aimed to define functional roles of such proteome data. Global protein network analysis using STRING software revealed α-tubulin, which was decreased, as one of central nodes of protein-protein interactions. Overexpression of α-tubulin (pcDNA6.2-TUBA1A) was then performed and its efficacy was confirmed. pcDNA6.2-TUBA1A could maintain levels of α-tubulin and its direct interacting partner, vimentin, after crystal exposure. Also, pcDNA6.2-TUBA1A successfully reduced cell death to almost the basal level and increased cell proliferation after crystal exposure. Additionally, tissue repair capacity was improved in pcDNA6.2-TUBA1A cells. Moreover, cell-crystal adhesion was reduced by pcDNA6.2-TUBA1A. Finally, levels of potential crystal receptors (HSP90, HSP70, and α-enolase) on apical membrane were dramatically reduced to basal levels by pcDNA6.2-TUBA1A. These findings implicate that α-tubulin has protective roles in kidney stone disease by preventing cell death and cell-crystal adhesion, but on the other hand, enhancing cell proliferation and tissue repair function.

Until now, kidney stone disease is still a public health problem in almost all areas around the world. The disease causes substantial suffering and ultimately end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Unfortunately, the disease mechanisms remain poorly understood. Calcium oxalate (CaOx) is the major chemical component found in clinical stones1. This type of the stones can be originated from supersaturation of calcium and oxalate ions, leading to crystallization inside renal tubular fluid or urine2. CaOx crystals can then nucleate to form “stone nidus” and adhere directly onto apical surface of renal tubular epithelial cells3,4,5. Adhesion of crystals onto the cells is a critical event, which triggers many cascades of cellular response, e.g. cytotoxicity, injury, proliferation and apoptosis, that ultimately lead to kidney stone formation6,7. CaOx crystals also evoke inflammatory processes that can lead to fibrosis, loss of nephron and eventually ESRD8,9.

Even with the aforementioned knowledge, molecular mechanisms of the downstream cellular response remain largely unknown. From our previous expression proteomics study7, we have identified a number of proteins with altered levels in MDCK renal tubular cells in response to CaOx crystals. Those altered proteins were involved in various biological processes, i.e. ubiquitination pathway, signal transduction, cellular structure, purine biosynthesis, metabolic enzyme, retinol biosynthesis, cellular transportation, protein degradation, RNA metabolism, RNA binding protein, cell surface antigen, nucleic acid metabolism, antioxidant enzyme, chaperone, carrier protein, and protein biosynthesis. However, functional significance of those altered proteins had not been investigated. In the present study, we thus performed global protein network analysis of those altered proteins. Subsequently, overexpression of a protein, which was one of the central nodes of such protein-protein interactions network, was performed. Moreover, functional investigations were performed to address functional significance of the central-node protein and its associated partners in kidney stone disease.

Results

Global protein network analysis

From our previous expression proteomics study7, a number of differentially expressed proteins were identified in CaOx-treated MDCK cells. However, their functional roles in kidney stone disease had not been investigated. Our present study thus aimed to address functional significance of such altered proteins. First, they were submitted to global protein network analysis using STRING software (version 10) (http://string.embl.de/)10. The protein-protein interactions network demonstrated that α-tubulin was one of the central nodes of such protein-protein interactions (Fig. 1). We thus focused our attention on functional significance of α-tubulin in association with kidney stone formation.

Figure 1. Global protein network analysis of altered proteins in MDCK renal tubular cells induced by CaOx crystals.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

All the altered proteins identified in our previous study7 were subjected to global protein network analysis using STRING tool (version 10) (http://string.embl.de/)10. Upward and downward arrows indicate up-regulation and down-regulation induced by the crystals, respectively. The connecting lines between protein nodes indicate protein-protein interactions.

Α-tubulin overexpression (pcDNA6.2-TUBA1A) in MDCK cells and confirmation of α-tubulin level

To address functional significance of α-tubulin, of which level was decreased in CaOx-treated MDCK cells, overexpression of α-tubulin was performed using Gateway Technology (Invitrogen). Figure 2A summarizes schematic approach of α-tubulin overexpression using this technology, which is based on pcDNA6.2-TUBA1A. Western blot analysis revealed that α-tubulin level was increased (approximately 1.5-fold) in pcDNA6.2-TUBA1A cells as compared to the unmodified (WT) cells, confirming that the overexpression of α-tubulin using this technique was successful (Fig. 2B).

Figure 2. Overexpression of α-tubulin in MDCK cells.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

(A) Schematic diagram of α-tubulin overexpression (pcDNA6.2-TUBA1A) by Gateway Technology. (B) Efficacy of α-tubulin overexpression was confirmed by Western blot analysis. GAPDH served as the loading control. The data are reported as mean ± SEM (n = 3 independent experiments). *p < 0.05 vs. WT.

Effect of pcDNA6.2-TUBA1A on levels of α-tubulin, vimentin and ANXA2 in CaOx-treated cells

From STRING analysis, the protein-protein interactions network highlighted associations among cytoskeletal proteins (α-tubulin and vimentin) and a multi-function calcium-binding protein (annexin A2 or ANXA2) (Fig. 3A). Interestingly, α-tubulin directly interacted with vimentin, but indirectly interacted with ANXA2 via vimentin (Fig. 3A). Their associations were then validated by immunofluorescence co-staining. Figure 3B confirmed the co-localization between α-tubulin and its direct interacting partner, vimentin. Moreover, the data also revealed that α-tubulin co-localized with its indirect interacting partner, ANXA2 (Fig. 3B). Based on these direct and indirect interactions predicted by STRING analysis and confirmed by immunofluorescence study, levels of these interacting proteins were then examined upon exposure to CaOx crystals in both WT and pcDNA6.2-TUBA1A cells. Figure 3C shows Western blot data on α-tubulin that was decreased in WT cells after 48-h exposure to CaOx crystals, consistent to the expression proteomics data7. Overexpression of α-tubulin by pcDNA6.2-TUBA1A significantly increased α-tubulin level in the cells with and without CaOx treatment. Interestingly, while CaOx caused decrease in level of vimentin, pcDNA6.2-TUBA1A could restore the level of vimentin to its basal level as compared to both WT and pcDNA6.2-TUBA1A cells without CaOx treatment (Fig. 3D). For ANXA2, which was indirectly interacted with α-tubulin but directly interacted with vimentin, the data showed that the increase of ANXA2 upon CaOx treatment in WT was almost unaffected by pcDNA6.2-TUBA1A (Fig. 3E). This data was not unexpected as the overexpression of a target protein could affect its direct partner, whereas it was not necessary that those indirect partners would be affected by its overexpression (note that ANXA2 is a multi-function protein that also interacts with many other proteins in various biological pathways).

Figure 3. Effect of α-tubulin overexpression on levels of α-tubulin, vimentin and annexin A2 (ANXA2) in CaOx-treated cells.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

(A) Interactions or associations among α-tubulin, vimentin and ANXA2 are highlighted from the global protein interactions network. (B) Immunofluorescence study confirmed co-localizations (shown in yellow) of α-tubulin (in red) and vimentin (in green) (panels i-iv), as well as α-tubulin (in red) and ANXA2 (in green) (panels v-viii) (original magnification power was 1000X). (C–E) Whole cell lysate of MDCK cells with or without treatment with CaOx crystals for 48 h were subjected to Western blot analysis for α-tubulin (C), vimentin (D), and ANXA2 (E). GAPDH served as the loading control. The data are reported as mean ± SEM (n = 3 independent experiments). *p < 0.05 vs. WT; ##p < 0.01 vs. WT + CaOx; ###p < 0.001 vs. WT + CaOx.

Effect of pcDNA6.2-TUBA1A on cell death and proliferation

Cell morphology was observed under a phase-contrast microscope. Without CaOx treatment, morphology of WT and pcDNA6.2-TUBA1A cells looked normal without any significant differences observed (Fig. 4A). After 48-h treatment with CaOx crystals, the WT cells looked unhealthy with disruption of cell borders, whereas pcDNA6.2-TUBA1A cells remained normal (Fig. 4A). Cell death assay showed dramatic increase of cell death in WT cells exposed to CaOx crystals as compared to the untreated WT cells (Fig. 4B). pcDNA6.2-TUBA1A successfully reduced the percentage of cell death in the CaOx-treated cells to its basal level (Fig. 4B). In addition, we hypothesized that if α-tubulin overexpression could decrease cell death, it might also promote cell proliferation. To address this hypothesis, the total cell number was determined. The data showed that pcDNA6.2-TUBA1A could increase the total cell number in both untreated and CaOx-treated cells, as compared to the WT (note that the degree of such increase was slightly inferior in the CaOx-treated cells) (Fig. 4C).

Figure 4. Effect of α-tubulin overexpression on cell death and proliferation.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

(A) Phase-contrast microscopy to evaluate cell morphology (original magnification power was 200X). (B) Cell death assay using Trypan blue staining. (C) Total cell number representing cell proliferation. The data are reported as mean ± SEM (n = 3 independent experiments). *p < 0.05 vs. WT; **p < 0.01 vs. WT; ##p < 0.01 vs. WT + CaOx; $$p < 0.01 vs. pcDNA6.2-TUBA1A.

Effect of pcDNA6.2-TUBA1A on cell cycle

Cell cycle assay was performed using propidium iodide staining and analyzed by flow cytometry (Fig. 5A). Without CaOx treatment, pcDNA6.2-TUBA1A cells were shifted into G2/M or mitotic phase, while the CaOx-treated WT cells were found mainly in G0/G1 phase (Fig. 5B). Moreover, pcDNA6.2-TUBA1A could restore the cell cycle to normal after CaOx treatment (comparable to the untreated WT cells). These findings indicated that pcDNA6.2-TUBA1A enabled cells undergoing mitosis to promote cell division and had the protective role against cell cycle shift caused by CaOx crystals.

Figure 5. Effect of α-tubulin overexpression on cell cycle.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Evaluation of cell cycle was performed by flow cytometry. (A) Representative flow cytometric data of cell cycles stained with propidium iodide. (B) Quantitative and statistical analyses of cell-cycle phases (G0/G1, S, and G2/M). The data are reported as mean ± SEM (n = 3 independent experiments). *p < 0.05 vs. WT; #p < 0.05 vs. WT + CaOx; $p < 0.05 vs. pcDNA6.2-TUBA1A + CaOx.

Effect of pcDNA6.2-TUBA1A on tissue repair

To evaluate tissue repair capacity, the cell monolayers were scratched by a 200-μl pipette tip to generate a cell-free gap. At basal time-point (0 h after scratch), the cell-free width was approximately 750 μm in all conditions (Fig. 6). Differences were detectable from 3–12 h after scratch – pcDNA6.2-TUBA1A could enhance tissue repair capacity of the cells at all time-points in corresponding groups. Moreover, both untreated and CaOx-treated pcDNA6.2-TUBA1A cells had better tissue repair capacity as compared to the untreated WT cells (Fig. 6). This data strengthened the importance of α-tubulin in tissue repair function.

Figure 6. Effect of α-tubulin overexpression on tissue repair.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Evaluation of tissue repair was done by using a scratch assay. (A) Representative images of cell-free width used for quantitative analysis (original magnification power was 40X). (B) Quantitative and statistical analyses of cell-free width at 0–15 h. The data are reported as mean ± SEM (n = 3 independent experiments). *p < 0.05 vs. WT; **p < 0.01 vs. WT; ##p < 0.01 vs. WT + CaOx; %p < 0.05 vs. pcDNA6.2-TUBA1A; $p < 0.05 vs. pcDNA6.2-TUBA1A + CaOx.

Effect of pcDNA6.2-TUBA1A on cell-crystal adhesion and expression of potential CaOx crystal receptors on apical membrane of MDCK cells

Finally, the role of α-tubulin in a critical mechanism of kidney stone formation was evaluated. Crystal-cell adhesion assay revealed that pcDNA6.2-TUBA1A had significantly less degree of cell-crystal adhesion – there were significantly smaller numbers of the adherent crystals on the cell surface of pcDNA6.2-TUBA1A cells as compared to those of WT (Fig. 7). This data is the first dataset to demonstrate the protective role of α-tubulin in kidney stone formation.

Figure 7. Effect of α-tubulin overexpression on cell-crystal adhesion.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

Upper panels show phase-contrast microscopic images of remaining crystals adhered on the surface of WT and pcDNA6.2-TUBA1A cells (original magnification power was 400X). Lower panel demonstrate the quantitative and statistical data. The data are reported as mean ± SEM (n = 6 independent experiments). ***p < 0.001 vs. WT.

We then examined the possible mechanisms underlying such protective role of α-tubulin. Recently, we have reported a set of membrane proteins on apical membrane of MDCK polarized epithelial cells that might serve as CaOx crystal-binding molecules on the apical membrane or crystal receptors11. In the present study, we thus examined levels of some of those potential crystal receptors and found that levels of heat shock protein 90 (HSP90), HSP70, and α-enolase were significantly decreased on apical membrane of CaOx-treated pcDNA6.2-TUBA1A cells as compared to the CaOx-treated WT cells (Fig. 8). These data strengthen the protective role of α-tubulin in kidney stone formation via decreased expression of potential CaOx receptors on apical membrane of renal tubular epithelial cells.

Figure 8. Effect of α-tubulin overexpression on expression of potential CaOx crystal receptors on apical membrane of MDCK cells.

Figure 8

Open in a new tab

(A) Expression levels of potential CaOx crystal receptors, including HSP90, HSP70 and α-enolase, on apical membrane of polarized MDCK cells were investigated by Western blot analysis. GAPDH served as the loading control. (B–D) Quantitative data are reported as mean ± SEM (n = 3 independent experiments). *p < 0.05 vs. WT; #p < 0.01 vs. WT + CaOx; ###p < 0.001 vs. WT + CaOx.

Discussion

From our previous study7, we have identified a number of proteins with significantly altered levels when the cells were exposed to CaOx crystals. In the present study, we further explored functional aspects of those altered proteins. From global protein network analysis using STRING tool (Fig. 1), protein-protein interaction network pointed out that α-tubulin played significant roles in response to CaOx crystal, which is the major causative chemical crystalline or solid composition inside kidney stone matrices. In expression proteomics work, α-tubulin was decreased by CaOx crystal exposure. To address functional significance of α-tubulin, overexpression that has been applied to several aspects of biology and disease models12,13, was thus performed and its efficacy was confirmed by Western blot analysis (Fig. 2).

Α-tubulin (55 kDa) is a cytoskeletal protein and major component of microtubules that plays a crucial role in regulation of cell shape, intracellular transport, cell motility, cell migration and cell division14,15. In addition, microtubule is important for tight junction preservation and restoration16. Depolymerization of microtubule can disrupt tight junction and reduce cellular adhesion and spreading17,18. Yap et al.19 have demonstrated that alterations in microtubule composition could affect the integrity of epithelial cell sheet. Moreover, emerging evidence has suggested that tubulin and microtubule-associated proteins may play roles in cellular stress response that favor survival of the cancer cells20.

Vimentin, another cytoskeletal protein, has been reported to play significant roles to maintain cell and tissue integrity21. It has been found to interact with several organelles, such as plasma membrane, lysosome, golgi, nucleus, and microtubules22. In our present study, we found that vimentin, of which level was also reduced by CaOx crystals7, directly interacted with α-tubulin. In addition, ANXA2 (a multi-function protein that has been previously documented as CaOx-binding molecules9,23) was also identified as a partner of the protein-protein interactions network. However, ANXA2 did not directly interact to α-tubulin while directly interacted with vimentin (Fig. 3A). We then validated their interaction by demonstrating their co-localizations (Fig. 3B). Their interactions were also confirmed by examination of their levels after the cells were exposed to CaOx crystals for 48 h. The data showed that while vimentin level had been dramatically influenced by α-tubulin overexpression (pcDNA6.2-TUBA1A) and could restore at its basal level when the cells were exposed with CaOx crystals, degree of the increased ANXA2 level induced by CaOx crystals was almost unaffected by pcDNA6.2-TUBA1A (Fig. 3D,E), consistent to the order or proximity of their interactions (Fig. 3A).

The scratch assay generally facilitates a study of cell migration, tissue reorganization, cell division24, and in our present study, tissue repair function. Α-tubulin overexpression was found to promote cell proliferation (Fig. 4), cell division (Fig. 5), and tissue repair (Fig. 6), mimicking the tumor-like phenotype. When cell-cell contact was disrupted by artificial wound, they tended to repair the wound through a combination of proliferation and migration24,25,26. This implied that α-tubulin overexpression promoted tissue repair by increased cell proliferation and cell migration. Moreover, our present study found that α-tubulin overexpression also increased expression of vimentin (Fig. 3). From previous evidence, vimentin has been reported to involve in tissue/wound repair in mice27. Therefore, it was plausible that the enhanced cell proliferation and tissue repair capacity of the pcDNA6.2-TUBA1A cells were from the combined effects of increased levels of both α-tubulin and vimentin.

CaOx crystals are injurious to the cell and may result to cytotoxicity. Many previous reports have shown that CaOx not only induced renal tubular cell injury but also enhanced crystal attachment on renal cell surface5,28,29. When crystals adhered on the epical cell surface, it could damage cell membrane6,30. To prove the hypothesis that α-tubulin overexpression could protect crystal attachment, cell-crystal adhesion assay was performed. The results confirmed that the degree of cell-crystal adhesion was significantly reduced by pcDNA6.2-TUBA1A (Fig. 7).

Furthermore, our previous studies reported that high-calcium and high-oxalate conditions could enhance crystal-binding proteins, such as HSP90, HSP70 and α-enolase, on apical membrane of MDCK cells11,31,32. To address whether these potential crystal receptors might be responsible for the reduction of cell-crystal adhesion, Western blotting was performed to measure levels of these proteins. The data nicely confirmed such hypothesis (Fig. 8).

In conclusion, our present study has demonstrated that overexpression of α-tubulin could protect renal tubular epithelial cells from cytotoxicity and cell death induced by CaOx crystals, while cell proliferation and tissue repair capacity were enhanced. Moreover, α-tubulin overexpression could reduce the degree of cell-crystal adhesion and decrease levels of potential crystal receptors (HSP90, HSP70, and α-enolase) on apical membrane of the cells that might be responsible for the reduction of cell-crystal adhesion. Taken together, α-tubulin has protective roles in kidney stone disease by preventing cell death and cell-crystal adhesion, but on the other hand, enhancing cell proliferation and tissue repair function.

Materials and Methods

Global protein network analysis

To obtain additional protein information for subsequent functional validation, all of the differentially expressed proteins identified from our previous study7 were subjected to global protein network analysis using STRING tool (version 10) (http://string.embl.de/)10. The predicted protein-protein associations were queried through experimentally derived physical protein interactions from literatures combining with the databases of curated biological pathway knowledge10.

Cell cultivation

Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells were maintained in minimum essential medium (MEM) supplemented with 10% FBS, 2 mM L-glutamine and 1.2% Penicillin G/Streptomycin (GIBCO, Invitrogen Corporation; Grand Island, NY) in a humidified incubator at 37 °C with 5% CO2. Polarization of the cells was achieved by using Transwells (0.4 μm pore size; Corstar; Cambridge, MA).

RNA extraction and RT-PCR amplification of α-tubulin gene (TUBA1A)

To overexpress TUBA1A gene, the cDNA was prepared from MDCK cells. Briefly, MDCK cells were grown in 60-mm dishes and then harvested for total RNA extraction using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Life Technologies; Carlsbad, CA). The cDNA was then prepared using Super Script III (Invitrogen) and reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) was performed using specific primers. PCR primers were designed for TUBA1A gene based on human sequence retrieved from CCDS database (accession no. CCDS8781) and the forward primer (5′-GCAACAACCTCTCCTCTTCG-3′) and the reverse primer (5′-TCCCTGTAAAAGCAGCACCT-3′) were used to amplify the entire TUBA1A gene. The PCR product was amplified using Phusion high fidelity DNA polymerase (New England BioLabs; Beverly, MA) and the amplification was carried out under the following conditions: a preliminary denaturation at 98 °C for 3 min, 34 cycles of denaturation at 98 °C for 30 s, annealing at 55 °C for 30 s, elongation at 72 °C for 1 min, and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. PCR product was separated by 1.2% agarose gel electrophoresis and detected by staining with ethidium bromide. The DNA bands were visualized using ChemiDoc MP Imaging System (Bio-Rad; Berkeley, CA).

Cloning of the TUBA1A gene into expression vector and mammalian cell transfection

The 1.5-kb TUBA1A gene was cloned into an expression vector using Gateway Technology (Invitrogen). The entry clone was generated using pCR8/GW/TOPO vector (Invitrogen). The plasmid DNA was then extracted before subcloning into destination vector using Vivid colors pcDNA 6.2/EmGFP-Bsd/V5-DEST and LR clonase II enzyme (Invitrogen). Plasmid DNA was extracted and confirmed by DNA sequencing. The DNA sequence of TUBA1A was submitted to GenGank/EMBL/DDBJ (accession no. AB853091). Both controlled cells (WT) and α-tubulin-overexpressed cells (containing pcDNA6.2-TUBA1A vector) were transfected using Lipofectamin 2000 (Invitrogen) and 8 μg/ml blasticidin was added to generate the stable cell line. Overexpression of α-tubulin was confirmed by Western blot analysis.

Western blot analysis

To validate overexpression of α-tubulin and to examine levels of its associated partners or related proteins, Western blot analysis was performed. Whole cell lysate or apical membrane protein fraction (isolation of apical membrane is detailed below) from MDCK cells were prepared in Laemmli’s buffer and resolved by 12% SDS-PAGE under reducing condition (with an equal amount of 30 μg/lane). The resolved proteins were then transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane using a semi-dry transfer apparatus (GE Healthcare; Uppsala, Sweden) at 85 V. Non-specific bindings were blocked with 5% skim milk in PBS. The membrane was then incubated overnight at 4 °C with each of primary antibodies: mouse monoclonal anti-α-tubulin, mouse monoclonal anti-vimentin, goat-polyclonal anti-ANXA2, mouse monoclonal anti-HSP90, mouse monoclonal anti-HSP70, rabbit-polyclonal anti-α-enolase, or mouse monoclonal anti-GAPDH (all were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.; Santa Cruz, CA and were diluted 1:1,000 in 1% skim milk/PBS). After washing with PBS three times, the membrane was further incubated with corresponding secondary antibody conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (1:2,000 in 1% skim milk/PBS; DAKO; Glostrup, Denmark) for 1 h at room temperature (RT) (set at 25 °C). The immunoreactive protein bands were visualized with SuperSignal West Pico chemiluminescence substrate (Pierce Biotechnology, Inc.; Rockford, IL) using autoradiogram.

Immunofluorescence co-staining

To demonstrate protein co-localizations and to confirm protein-protein interactions predicted by STRING analysis, immunofluorescence study was performed. MDCK cells were cultivated on a cover slip for 24 h and the cells were fixed with 3.7% formaldehyde/PBS for 15 min and permeabilized with 0.1% triton X-100/PBS for 15 min. The cells were then incubated with mouse monoclonal anti-α-tubulin, rabbit polyclonal anti-vimentin, or goat-polyclonal anti-ANXA2 (all were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc. and were diluted 1:50 in 1% BSA/PBS) at 37 °C for 1 h. After washing, the cells were incubated with corresponding secondary antibody conjugated with Alexa 488 (in green; for α-tubulin) or Alexa 555 (in red; for vimentin and ANXA2) (Invitrogen-Molecular Probes; Burlinton, ON, Canada; all were diluted 1:500 in 1% BSA/PBS) at 37 °C for 1 h, whereas 0.1 μg/ml Hoechst dye (Invitrogen-Molecular Probes) was also co-incubated for nuclear staining. The cells were finally mounted with 50% glycerol/PBA and images were captured under an ECLIPSE 80i fluorescence microscope (Nikon; Tokyo, Japan).

Preparation of CaOx crystals and exposure of MDCK cells to the crystals

CaOx crystals were prepared in an artificial urine as previously described33. Briefly, 125 ml of 25.08 mM CaCl2.2H2O was added into 250 ml of a buffer containing 19.26 mM tri-sodium citrate dihydrate (C6H5Na3O7.2H2O), 23.1 mM magnesium sulfate heptahydrate (MgSO4.7H2O) and 127.4 mM potassium chloride (KCl). The pH of the solution was adjusted to 6.5 using HCl. The solution was then incubated at RT for 15 min. Thereafter, 125 ml of 6.4 mM sodium oxalate (Na2C2O4) was added under a continuous stirring. The solution was incubated further at RT for 15 min. CaOx crystals were then harvested by centrifugation at 2,000 × g for 5 min. Supernatant was discarded and the crystals were resuspended in methanol. After another centrifugation at 2,000 × g for 5 min, methanol was discarded and the crystals were air-dried. After crystal generation and harvesting, the crystals were decontaminated with UV irradiation for 30 min. They were then added to a complete MEM medium (GIBCO, Invitrogen Corporation) to achieve a final concentration of 1,000 μg of crystals/ml of medium. MDCK cells were cultivated in complete MEM medium without or with crystals for 48 h in a humidified incubator at 37 °C with 5% CO2.

Cell death and cell proliferation assays

Both WT and α-tubulin-overexpressed (pcDNA6.2-TUBA1A) cells with or without CaOx treatment were subjected to quantitative analysis of cell death and proliferation using trypan blue staining. Briefly, The cells were detached from the cultured well using 0.1% trypsin in 2.5 mM EDTA and immediately resuspended in MEM supplemented with 10% FBS to terminate trypsin activity. Aliquots of cell suspension were mixed with 0.4% trypan blue solution (GIBCO) and the cells were then counted using hemacytometer. Trypan blue-positive cells represented dead cells, whereas all the cells counted represented cell proliferation at 48 h after crystal exposure.

Cell cycle assay

Both WT and α-tubulin-overexpressed (pcDNA6.2-TUBA1A) cells were inoculated in 60-mm culture dish. After 48-h incubation with or without CaOx crystals, cell cycle was analyzed and quantitated by flow cytometry after propidium iodide staining. Briefly, the cells were collected by trypsinization, fixed and permeabilized with ice-cold 70% ethanol, and incubated on ice for 30 min. Thereafter, the cells were washed twice and resuspended in PBS containing 100 μg/ml RNase A (Sigma-Aldrich; St. Louis, MO). After incubation for 30 min, the cells were stained with propidium iodide (BD Biosciences; San Jose, CA) at RT in the dark for 10 min. The stained cells were finally analyzed for their DNA content using BD Accuri C6 flow cytometer (BD Accuri, Beckman Coulter; Fullerton, CA). At least 10,000 events per each sample were evaluated and the cell cycle histograms were generated by BD Accuri™ C6 software in order to quantify the percentage of cells in G0/G1, S and G2/M phases.

Tissue repair assay

Tissue repair capacity of the cells was evaluated by using a scratch method. Briefly, both WT and α-tubulin-overexpressed (pcDNA6.2-TUBA1A) cells were inoculated in 6-well plate. After 48-h treatment with or without CaOx crystals incubation, the cell monolayers were scratched along the culture well diameter using a 200-μl pipette tip to create a cell-free area. After washing with PBS to remove debris and detached cells, the cultures were further maintained in a humidified incubator at 37 °C with 5% CO2. At indicated time-points (0, 3, 6, 9, 12 and 15 h after the scratch), scratched wound size was monitored using BioStation CT (Nikon Corp.; Tokyo, Japan). The captured images were submitted to Tarosoft Image framework v.0.9.6 (Nikon) to accurately measure the cell-free width.

Cell-crystal adhesion assay

Both WT and α-tubulin-overexpressed (pcDNA6.2-TUBA1A) cells were inoculated in 6-well plate and maintained for 48-h. Thereafter, the culture medium was removed and the cells were washed with PBS twice. Crystal-cell adhesion was initiated by the addition of 10% FBS-supplemented MEM containing crystals into each well. The cells were further incubated in a humidified incubator at 37 °C with 5% CO2 for 30 min. Thereafter, the cells were vigorously washed using PBS five times to remove the unbound crystals. Finally, the remaining crystals adhered on the cell surface were counted in 20 randomized high power fields (HPF) per culture well.

Isolation of apical membrane of MDCK cells by peeling method

Both WT and α-tubulin-overexpressed (pcDNA6.2-TUBA1A) cells at a density of approximately 5.0–7.5 × 104 cells/ml were seeded and grown on prewetted collagen-coated permeable polycarbonate membrane in Transwells for four days. The culture medium was refreshed every other day. After 48-h treatment with or without CaOx crystals, the cell monolayers were washed with PBS three times to remove the unbound crystals. Apical membrane of the polarized MDCK cells was isolated by a peeling method recently established34. Briefly, Whatman filter paper (0.18-mm-thick, Whatman International Ltd.; Maidstone, UK) pre-wetted with deionized water was placed onto the polarized cell monolayer. After a 5-min incubation period, the filter paper was peeled out and the apical membranes retained at the filter paper surface were harvested by rehydration in deionized water and gentle scrapping. The apical membrane-enriched fraction was then lyophilized. Dried apical membrane was solubilized in 1X Laemmli’s buffer and quantitated by Bradford’s method using Bio-Rad Protein Assay (Bio-Rad Laboratories; Hercules, CA). The recovered proteins were then subjected to Western blot analysis for potential crystal receptors.

Statistical analysis

Quantitative analyses were done in at least triplicates of independent experiments unless stated otherwise. All quantitative data are presented as mean ± SEM. Comparisons between the two groups of samples were performed using unpaired Student’s t-test, whereas multiple comparisons of more than two groups of samples were performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s post-hoc test. P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Manissorn, J. et al. Alpha-tubulin enhanced renal tubular cell proliferation and tissue repair but reduced cell death and cell-crystal adhesion. Sci. Rep. 6, 28808; doi: 10.1038/srep28808 (2016).

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by Mahidol University research grant, Office of the Higher Education Commission and Mahidol University under the National Research Universities Initiative, and the Thailand Research Fund (RTA5680004 and TRG5580013). VT is supported by “Chalermphrakiat” and “Research Staff” Grants, whereas J.M. is supported by Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital.

Footnotes

Author Contributions J.M. and V.T. designed research; J.M., S.K. and A.V. performed experiments; J.M., S.K., A.V. and V.T. analyzed data; J.M. and V.T. wrote the manuscript; All authors reviewed the manuscript.

References

  1. Khan S. R. Renal tubular damage/dysfunction: key to the formation of kidney stones. Urol. Res. 34, 86–91 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barbas C., Garcia A., Saavedra L. & Muros M. Urinary analysis of nephrolithiasis markers. J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci 781, 433–455 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Lieske J. C., Toback F. G. & Deganello S. Direct nucleation of calcium oxalate dihydrate crystals onto the surface of living renal epithelial cells in culture. Kidney Int. 54, 796–803 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Sheng X., Ward M. D. & Wesson J. A. Crystal surface adhesion explains the pathological activity of calcium oxalate hydrates in kidney stone formation. J Am. Soc. Nephrol. 16, 1904–1908 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Wesson J. A., Worcester E. M., Wiessner J. H., Mandel N. S. & Kleinman J. G. Control of calcium oxalate crystal structure and cell adherence by urinary macromolecules. Kidney Int. 53, 952–957 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Peng H., Ouyang J. M., Yao X. Q. & Yang R. E. Interaction between submicron COD crystals and renal epithelial cells. Int. J Nanomedicine. 7, 4727–4737 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Thongboonkerd V., Semangoen T., Sinchaikul S. & Chen S. T. Proteomic analysis of calcium oxalate monohydrate crystal-induced cytotoxicity in distal renal tubular cells. J Proteome. Res. 7, 4689–4700 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Khan S. R. Crystal-induced inflammation of the kidneys: results from human studies, animal models, and tissue-culture studies. Clin. Exp. Nephrol. 8, 75–88 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Mulay S. R. et al. Calcium oxalate crystals induce renal inflammation by NLRP3-mediated IL-1beta secretion. J Clin. Invest 123, 236–246 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Szklarczyk D. et al. STRING v10: protein-protein interaction networks, integrated over the tree of life. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, D447–D452 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fong-ngern K., Peerapen P., Sinchaikul S., Chen S. T. & Thongboonkerd V. Large-scale identification of calcium oxalate monohydrate crystal-binding proteins on apical membrane of distal renal tubular epithelial cells. J Proteome. Res. 10, 4463–4477 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Habibi N., Mohd Hashim S. Z., Norouzi A. & Samian M. R. A review of machine learning methods to predict the solubility of overexpressed recombinant proteins in Escherichia coli. BMC. Bioinformatics. 15, 134 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Prelich G. Gene overexpression: uses, mechanisms, and interpretation. Genetics 190, 841–854 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Draber P., Sulimenko V. & Draberova E. Cytoskeleton in mast cell signaling. Front Immunol. 3, 130 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Wloga D. & Gaertig J. Post-translational modifications of microtubules. J Cell Sci 123, 3447–3455 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Glotfelty L. G., Zahs A., Iancu C., Shen L. & Hecht G. A. Microtubules are required for efficient epithelial tight junction homeostasis and restoration. Am. J Physiol Cell Physiol 307, C245–C254 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Domnina L. V., Rovensky J. A., Vasiliev J. M. & Gelfand I. M. Effect of microtubule-destroying drugs on the spreading and shape of cultured epithelial cells. J Cell Sci 74, 267–282 (1985). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Evans M. D. & Steele J. G. Multiple attachment mechanisms of corneal epithelial cells to a polymer–cells can attach in the absence of exogenous adhesion proteins through a mechanism that requires microtubules. Exp. Cell Res. 233, 88–98 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Yap A. S., Stevenson B. R., Abel K. C., Cragoe E. J. Jr. & Manley S. W. Microtubule integrity is necessary for the epithelial barrier function of cultured thyroid cell monolayers. Exp. Cell Res. 218, 540–550 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Parker A. L., Kavallaris M. & McCarroll J. A. Microtubules and their role in cellular stress in cancer. Front Oncol. 4, 153 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Osmanagic-Myers S. et al. Plectin reinforces vascular integrity by mediating crosstalk between the vimentin and the actin networks. J Cell Sci 128, 4138–4150 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Toivola D. M., Tao G. Z., Habtezion A., Liao J. & Omary M. B. Cellular integrity plus: organelle-related and protein-targeting functions of intermediate filaments. Trends Cell Biol. 15, 608–617 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kumar V., Farell G., Deganello S. & Lieske J. C. Annexin II is present on renal epithelial cells and binds calcium oxalate monohydrate crystals. J Am. Soc. Nephrol. 14, 289–297 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Yarrow J. C., Perlman Z. E. & Westwood N. J. & Mitchison,T.J. A high-throughput cell migration assay using scratch wound healing, a comparison of image-based readout methods. BMC. Biotechnol. 4, 21 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Coomber B. L. & Gotlieb A. I. In vitro endothelial wound repair. Interaction of cell migration and proliferation. Arteriosclerosis 10, 215–222 (1990). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Wong M. K. & Gotlieb A. I. The reorganization of microfilaments, centrosomes, and microtubules during in vitro small wound reendothelialization. J Cell Biol. 107, 1777–1783 (1988). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. DePianto D. & Coulombe P. A. Intermediate filaments and tissue repair. Exp. Cell Res. 301, 68–76 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Khan S. R. Calcium oxalate crystal interaction with renal tubular epithelium, mechanism of crystal adhesion and its impact on stone development. Urol. Res. 23, 71–79 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Tsujihata M. Mechanism of calcium oxalate renal stone formation and renal tubular cell injury. Int. J Urol. 15, 115–120 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Yasui T. et al. Calcium oxalate crystal attachment to cultured rat kidney epithelial cell, NRK-52E. Urol. Int. 67, 73–76 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Chutipongtanate S., Fong-ngern K., Peerapen P. & Thongboonkerd V. High calcium enhances calcium oxalate crystal binding capacity of renal tubular cells via increased surface annexin A1 but impairs their proliferation and healing. J Proteome. Res. 11, 3650–3663 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Kanlaya R., Fong-ngern K. & Thongboonkerd V. Cellular adaptive response of distal renal tubular cells to high-oxalate environment highlights surface alpha-enolase as the enhancer of calcium oxalate monohydrate crystal adhesion. J Proteomics 80C, 55–65 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Thongboonkerd V., Semangoen T. & Chutipongtanate S. Factors determining types and morphologies of calcium oxalate crystals: Molar concentrations, buffering, pH, stirring and temperature. Clin. Chim. Acta 367, 120–131 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Fong-ngern K., Chiangjong W. & Thongboonkerd V. Peeling as a novel, simple, and effective method for isolation of apical membrane from intact polarized epithelial cells. Anal. Biochem. 395, 25–32 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES