Abstract
Absolute latency, interocular difference in latency, and waveform of visual evoked responses (VER) to checkerboard reversal stimuli recorded from the midline of the skull were studied in 104 multiple sclerosis patients, 25 to 50 years of age, classified according to visual symptomatology. Group 1 had strong evidence of past or present optic neuritis. Patients with blurring of vision, diplopia, and undefined visual complaints were assigned to group 2, while group 3 contained patients with no visual symptoms but suspected diagnosis of multiple sclerosis on other grounds. The three parameters explored showed consistent association with the degree of visual involvement, as assessed by clinical impression, but their discriminatory power was diverse. Absolute latency was significantly longer in group 1 patients compared with groups 2 and 3, but it did not discriminate between the last two, whereas interocular difference in latency proved to be sensitive to differences between symptomatic (diplopia, blurring) and asymptomatic groups (2 and 3). Waveshapes were grouped into three categories based upon degree of distortion of the major positive peak, and their relative distribution among the three patient groups was found to be associated with symptomatology. We suggest that, in the production of symptoms such as diplopia, a temporal disparity of afferent impulses might be involved in much the same way that spatial incongruities between both eyes lead to impaired function. In this regard, interocular difference in latency rather than absolute latency would be a more accurate predictor of symptom development. The analysis of VER waveshape suggests, in addition, the importance of inhomogeneous involvement of the visual pathways in the production of symptoms during the evolution of multiple sclerosis.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Asselman P., Chadwick D. W., Marsden D. C. Visual evoked responses in the diagnosis and management of patients suspected of multiple sclerosis. Brain. 1975 Jun;98(2):261–282. doi: 10.1093/brain/98.2.261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Behrman J., Nissim S., Arden G. B. A clinical method for obtaining pattern visual evoked responses. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1972;24(0):199–206. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4684-8231-7_19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cigánek L. Variability of the human visual evoked potential: normative data. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1969 Jul;27(1):35–42. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(69)90106-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Feinsod M., Hoyt W. F. Subclinical optic neuropathy in multiple sclerosis. How early VER components reflect axon loss and conduction defects in optic pathways. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1975 Nov;38(11):1109–1114. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.38.11.1109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Halliday A. M., McDonald W. I., Mushin J. Delayed visual evoked response in optic neuritis. Lancet. 1972 May 6;1(7758):982–985. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(72)91155-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Halliday A. M., McDonald W. I., Mushin J. Visual evoked response in diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Br Med J. 1973 Dec 15;4(5893):661–664. doi: 10.1136/bmj.4.5893.661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Halliday A. M., Michael W. F. Changes in pattern-evoked responses in man associated with the vertical and horizontal meridians of the visual field. J Physiol. 1970 Jun;208(2):499–513. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Heron J. R., Regan D., Milner B. A. Delay in visual perception in unilateral optic atrophy after retrobulbar neuritis. Brain. 1974 Mar;97(1):69–78. doi: 10.1093/brain/97.1.69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McDonald W. I. Pathophysiology in multiple sclerosis. Brain. 1974 Mar;97(1):179–196. doi: 10.1093/brain/97.1.179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Regan D., Milner B. A., Heron J. R. Delayed visual perception and delayed visual evoked potentials in the spinal form of multiple sclerosis and in retrobulbar neuritis. Brain. 1976 Mar;99(1):43–66. doi: 10.1093/brain/99.1.43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Richey E. T., Kooi K. A., Tourtellotte W. W. Visually evoked responses in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1971 Jun;34(3):275–280. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.34.3.275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]