Skip to main content
The Journal of Biological Chemistry logoLink to The Journal of Biological Chemistry
. 2016 Mar 28;291(23):12358–12369. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M116.722801

Toll/Interleukin-1 Receptor Domain Derived from TcpC (TIR-TcpC) Ameliorates Experimental Autoimmune Arthritis by Down-modulating Th17 Cell Response*

Shweta Pasi 1,1,2, Ravi Kant 1,1,2, Avadhesha Surolia 1,3
PMCID: PMC4933282  PMID: 27022030

Abstract

Evasion through immunomodulation is one of the several strategies adopted by pathogens to prolong their survival within the host. One such pathogen, Escherichia coli CFT073, utilizes an immunomodulatory protein, TcpC, to combat the host's innate immune defense. TcpC abrogates the function of MyD88 in macrophages, thus perturbing all the signaling processes that involve this adaptor protein. Although central to various signaling pathways initiated by IL-1, IL-18, and toll-like receptors, the precise contribution of MyD88 to the development of autoimmunity, particularly rheumatoid arthritis, still needs extensive exploration. Herein, by using the toll/interleukin-1 receptor (TIR) domain homologous C-terminal motif of TcpC, i.e. TIR-TcpC, we found MyD88 to be critical for the induction and progression of rheumatoid arthritis through its pivotal role in the development of Th17 cells, the subset of CD4+ T-cells widely implicated in various autoimmune disorders. The TIR-TcpC mediated inhibition of signaling through MyD88, and subsequent amelioration of experimental autoimmune arthritis was observed to be an outcome of perturbations in the NFκB-RORγt (RAR-related orphan receptor γt) axis.

Keywords: arthritis, autoimmunity, collagen, myeloid differentiation primary response gene 88 (MYD88), NF-κB, toll/interleukin-1 receptor (TIR)

Introduction

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA),4 an autoimmune inflammatory disorder primarily of the diarthrodial joints, cripples about 1% of the global population and requires early therapeutic intervention for effective disease management. The clinical picture is characterized by extensive immune cell infiltration, inflammation of the synovial lining, and erosion of the cartilage and underlying bone. The pathogenesis of RA is complex with the involvement of numerous autocrine and paracrine cytokine loops that perpetuate and amplify the vicious cycle of chronic inflammatory pathways (1, 2). Considering the complicated immunopathology of RA and the active involvement of cells of both the innate and adaptive arms of the immune system, inhibition of multiple pathways is highly desirable. Alternatively, identification and targeting of molecules crucially involved in the activation of both arms of the immune system could be an important approach.

Identified as a gene up-regulated during myeloid differentiation in response to IL-6 (3), MyD88 has over the years emerged as a canonical adaptor protein for the toll-like receptors (TLRs) and IL-1 family of receptors including IL-18R (4). Moreover, with the participation of these receptors in the development of both innate and adaptive responses, the relevance of MyD88 as a key player and a promising therapeutic target for RA becomes enormous and demands extensive explorations.

MyD88 is a modular protein (5) that consists of a death domain at the N terminus (6) and a toll/IL-1 receptor (TIR) domain at the C terminus linked by an intermediate domain (5, 7). The cross-talk between MyD88 and its interacting partners is mediated by the TIR domain located at their C termini (8).

In the present study, we utilized the immunomodulatory property of a TIR domain-containing protein, TcpC, derived from uropathogenic Escherichia coli CFT073 (9) to study the role of MyD88 in the development of RA. TcpC bears a structural domain closely resembling the mammalian TIR domain in its C-terminal region. This domain aids TcpC in interacting with MyD88, thus preventing the association of MyD88 with its interacting partner (TLR or IL-1 receptor (IL-1R)), leading to abrogation of the signaling cascade (911).

We treated mice exhibiting collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) with TIR domain derived from TcpC (TIR-TcpC) and observed a significant remission of the disease activity. The disease-modifying effect of TIR-TcpC could be attributed to limitation of the pathogenic Th17 responses, which turned out to be an outcome of TIR-TcpC-induced inhibition of MyD88 signaling in dendritic cells (DCs) and CD4+ T-cells. Abrogation of the MyD88 signaling cascade by TIR-TcpC arrested the activation of NFκB and subsequent transcription of downstream Th17 signature RORγt in naïve CD4+ T-cells cultured under Th17-polarizing conditions.

Our study further demonstrates the significance of MyD88 signaling in the development of RA through its effects on Th17 differentiation and function as observed in complete and cell-specific MyD88−/− mice. Cumulatively, these results suggest a novel pathway for regulation of Th17 differentiation by MyD88 and also highlight the superiority of targeting MyD88 for effective management of Th17 cell-mediated autoimmunities. Furthermore, we put forward TIR-TcpC as a novel and appealing therapeutic molecule for rheumatoid arthritis.

Experimental Procedures

Cloning, Expression, and Purification

Uropathogenic E. coli CFT073 strain procured from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) was cultured and maintained according to the supplier's instructions. Genomic DNA was isolated using a commercially available kit (Qiagen), and the region of interest was amplified using the following gene-specific primers: TIR-TcpC forward primer, 5′-AAGCTTTGTATGATTTTTTCATATCCCATGC-3′; TIR-TcpC reverse primer, 5′-AATTCTTATCTTCTCCTGTATGCTATTTCAGCCAACTC-3′; TIRRAR-TcpC reverse primer, 5′-AATTCTTATCTTGCCCTGTATGCTATTTCAGC-3′. The forward primer for TIRRAR-TcpC was the same as for TIR-TcpC. All the primers were 5′-phosphorylated. The amplified products (TIR-TcpC and TIRRAR-TcpC amplicons) were cloned into pPAL7 expression vector (Bio-Rad) using a restriction endonuclease-free cloning strategy. The identity of recombinants obtained was verified by sequence analysis. Plasmids pPAL7-TIR-TcpC and pPAL7-TIRRAR-TcpC were amplified in E. coli DH5α and transformed into E. coli BL21(DE3) cells. Protein expression was induced using 1 mm isopropyl β-d-thiogalactopyranoside (Calbiochem) for 4 h at 37 °C. The overexpressed protein was purified from inclusion bodies as follows. The inclusion bodies were harvested by centrifugation at 13,500 rpm for 60 min at 4 °C. The inclusion bodies obtained were solubilized in 0.1 m sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.0, containing 8 m urea at room temperature (shaking for 1 h). Thereafter solubilized protein was dialyzed against a urea gradient (stepwise) at 4 °C. Refolded proteins TIR-TcpC and TIRRAR-TcpC with an 8-kDa N-terminal Profinity eXact tag (recognized by a mutant subtilisin protease, S189) were purified using Bio-Scale Mini Profinity eXact FPLC columns (Bio-Rad). Identity of the expressed protein was established by Western blotting using polyclonal serum raised against keyhole limpet hemocyanin-conjugated peptides derived from TcpC. Protein concentration was determined spectrophotometrically by measuring absorbance at 280 nm and calculated using the following equation: A280 = ϵcl where ϵ is molar extinction coefficient (liters/(mol × cm)), A is absorbance at 280 nm, c is concentration (mol/liter), and l is the path length of the cuvette (cm). ϵ for TIR-TcpC and TIRRAR-TcpC is 29,910 liters/(mol × cm). The sequences corresponding to TIR-TcpC and TIRRAR-TcpC were subcloned into mammalian expression vector pEGFP-N1 (Clontech). The sequences of primers used were as follows: TIR-TcpC-EGFP forward primer, 5′-TCAAGCTTCGAATTCTGCCGCCACCATGTATGATTTTTTCATAT-3′; TIR-TcpC-EGFP reverse primer, 5′-GCGGTACCGTCGACTGTTATTATCTTCTCCTGTATGC-3′; TIRRAR-TcpC-EGFP reverse primer, 5′-GCGGTACCGTCGACTGTTATTATCTTGCCCTGTATGC-3′. The forward primer for TIRRAR-TcpC-EGFP was the same as for TIR-TcpC-EGFP. The identity of recombinants was verified by sequence analysis.

Tissue Culture, Cell Lines, and Reagents

Cytokines IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-12, IL-23, TNF-α, and TGF-β were purchased from R&D Systems and Peprotech. Cell line RAW-Blue was procured from Invivogen was cultured and maintained according to the suppliers' instructions. Tissue culture media Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium, heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (certified), and antibiotic-antimycotic solution were obtained from Gibco. Zeocin, Normocin, Quantiblue, and p65IP were purchased from Invivogen. Methyl-β-cyclodextrin was obtained from Sigma.

Generation of Polyclonal Sera to TIR-TcpC

Antiserum was generated against TIR-TcpC by immunizing a rabbit (New Zealand White strain, 10–12 weeks old, male) subcutaneously with 200 μg of TIR-TcpC-derived peptides EQTLEVGDSLRRNIDL and FLNKKWTQYELDSLIC (Bioconcept) (sequences of the peptides were taken from a previous report (9)) conjugated to keyhole limpet hemocyanin (Sigma) and emulsified in complete Freund's adjuvant (Sigma). TIR-TcpC-derived peptides were coupled to keyhole limpet hemocyanin using the HOOK peptide coupling kit (GBiosciences). At day 14, a booster dosage of 150 μg was given in incomplete Freund's adjuvant (Sigma). Subsequently, on day 23, a 5–10-ml bleed was taken and analyzed for reactivity by Western blotting.

Mice

C57BL6/J, B6.MyD88−/−, B6.CD4-cre, B6.CD11c-Cre, and B6.MyD88flox/flox mice procured from The Jackson Laboratory were housed and bred under standard conditions with ad libitum access to food and water. Animals were allowed to acclimate for at least 2 weeks prior to the experiments. The experimental protocol and animal handling were strictly in accordance with the Institutional Animal Ethics committee of the National Institute of Immunology, New Delhi, India.

Experimental Autoimmune Arthritis Induction and Assessment

Autoimmune experimental arthritis was induced in C57BL6/J, B6.MyD88−/−, B6.MyD88ΔM, or B6.MyD88ΔT mice (male, 12–14 weeks old) as described previously (12). Briefly, mice were immunized intradermally with 100 μg of chicken type II collagen (Chondrex) emulsified in complete Freund's adjuvant. Chicken type II collagen was dissolved in l0 mm acetic acid with mild stirring at 4 °C. Each paw was scored individually for joint inflammation as described previously (13) on a scale of 0–4. The scoring system used was as follows: 0, no evidence of erythema and swelling; l, mild erythema or swelling (detectable arthritis); 2, moderate erythema and swelling; 3, significant erythema and swelling encompassing entire paw; 4, maximal swelling with or without limb distortion. For radiographic analysis, at the end of the treatment period (∼6 weeks), animals were anesthetized, and fore- and hind paws were radiographed using In Vivo Imaging System FX Pro (Eastman Kodak Co.). The severity of bone erosion was ranked as described previously (13) using a modified version of the Larsen scoring method: 0, normal; 1, slight abnormality with any one or two of the exterior metatarsal bones showing slight bone erosion; 2, definite early abnormality with any of the metatarsal or tarsal bones showing bone erosion; 3, medium destructive abnormality with any of the metatarsal or any one of the tarsal bones showing definite bone erosion; 4, severe destructive abnormality with all the metatarsal bones showing definite bone erosion and at least one of the tarsometatarsal joints being completely eroded, leaving some bony joint outlines partly preserved; 5, mutilating abnormality with no bony outlines that can be deciphered.

Assessment of Serological Markers of Disease

Serum samples were collected and assayed for levels of cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP), C-terminal telopeptides of collagen type II (CTX II), and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-3 in an ELISA-based assay. Kits for COMP, CTX II, and MMP-3 were purchased from AnaMar, Immunodiagnostics Systems, and R&D Systems. For the cytokine assay, the levels of various cytokines in serum or joint tissue homogenates were quantified using Ready-SET-Go! ELISA kits (eBioscience) following the manufacturer's instructions. Values observed were normalized to control (buffer).

T-cell Isolation, Transfection, Differentiation, and NFκB Activity Estimation

Splenocytes harvested from C57BL6/J mice (4–6 weeks old, male) were magnetically sorted for naïve CD4+CD62L+ T-cells (Miltenyi Biotech). Purified naïve CD4+ T-cells were electroporated with 0.5 μg of TIR-TcpC-EGFP or TIRRAR-TcpC-EGFP using an Amaxa Mouse T-cell Nucleofector kit (Lonza). Transfection efficiency was determined by FACS. Purified naïve T-cells were subjected to Th17 differentiation conditions as described previously (14, 15). Briefly, purified naïve T-cells (0.5 million cells/ml) were treated with anti-CD3 (plate-bound, 1 μg/ml; catalogue number 553057, BD Biosciences), anti-CD28 (1 μg/ml; catalogue number 553294, BD Biosciences), TGF-β (5 ng/ml), IL-6 (40 ng/ml), IL-23 (50 ng/ml), anti-IL-4 (5 μg/ml; catalogue number 554433, BD Biosciences), anti-IFNγ (5 μg/ml; catalogue number 554409, BD Biosciences), anti-IL-2 (10 μg/ml; catalogue number 554375, BD Biosciences), IL-1β (10 ng/ml), and TNF-α (10 ng/ml). For intracellular staining, cells were stimulated with phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (Sigma) and ionomycin (Sigma) in the presence of GolgiStop (BD Biosciences) for 4 h prior to staining. To determine levels of NFκB activity in treated or untreated naïve CD4+ T-cells, nuclear fractions were isolated using a Nuclear Extraction kit (Active Motif). NFκB activity was estimated using a TransAM p65 kit (Active Motif). NFκB activity was estimated in RAW-Blue cells according to the supplier's instructions.

Proliferation Assay

To determine proliferative activity, splenocyte cultures at the end of 48 h were pulsed with [3H]thymidine for 10–12h. Thereafter cells were harvested onto Filtermat A (Wallac) and analyzed in a plate scintillation counter (PerkinElmer Life Sciences).

Intracellular Staining and FACS Analysis

Cells were harvested, washed, and resuspended in staining buffer (BD Biosciences). Thereafter cells were treated with Fc Block (1 μg/million cells; catalogue number 553142, BD Biosciences) for 15 min on ice. Subsequently cells were washed and incubated with PE-anti-CD4 (1:100; catalogue number 553730, BD Biosciences), Alexa Fluor 700-anti-CD4 (1:100; catalogue number 557956, BD Biosciences), PE-anti-CD11c (1:100; catalogue number 553802, BD Biosciences), anti-CD121a (1:50; catalogue number Ab8154, Abcam), FITC-anti-CD69 (1:250; catalogue number 553236, BD Biosciences), and Alexa Fluor 488-anti-rat IgG (1:1000; catalogue number 4416, Cell Signaling Technology) for 30 min on ice. Next, for intracellular staining, cells were resuspended in Cytofix/Cytoperm buffer (BD Biosciences) for 15 min at room temperature, washed with Perm/Wash buffer (BD Biosciences), and incubated with PE-anti-IFNγ (1:200; catalogue number 12-7311-41, eBioscience), FITC-anti-IFNγ (1:200; catalogue number 562019, BD Biosciences), Alexa Fluor 488-anti-IL-4 (1:100; catalogue number 557728, BD Biosciences), FITC-anti-IL-17A (1:100; catalogue number 560220, BD Biosciences), Alexa Fluor 488-anti-FoxP3 (1:100; catalogue number 563487, BD Biosciences), and FITC-anti-RORγt (1:100; catalogue number Ab104906, Abcam) for 30 min on ice. Thereafter cells were washed twice with Perm/Wash buffer and resuspended in staining buffer for acquisition. Data were acquired on a BD Biosciences FACSVerse and analyzed using Flowing Software 2.

Co-immunoprecipitation Assay

100 μg of TIR-TcpC carrying an N-terminal affinity tag (Profinity eXact tag) was incubated overnight at 4 °C with agarose coupled to a mutant subtilisin protease, S189, that binds with high specificity to the Profinity eXact tag. The resin bound to TIR-TcpC was washed twice with 0.1 m phosphate buffer (pH 7.2). Then lysates of naïve CD4+CD62L+ T-cells stimulated with IL-1β for 90 min were incubated with agarose-bound TIR-TcpC for 1 h at 4 °C followed by 30 min at 22 °C. Nonspecifically bound proteins were removed by washing five times with wash buffer (0.1 m phosphate buffer, pH 7.2, 0.1% Nonidet P-40, 1× protease inhibitor mixture (Sigma)). Lysates were prepared using non-denaturing Nonidet P-40 buffer (20 mm Tris HCl, pH 8, 137 mm NaCl, 1% Nonidet P-40, 2 mm EDTA) supplemented with 0.125% (w/v) N-octyl glucoside. Bound proteins were recovered from the agarose beads by boiling them in 2× SDS loading buffer followed by 10% SDS-PAGE and Western blotting.

Western Blotting

Protein samples electrophoresed on a 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel were transferred onto nitrocellulose membrane using a semidry Trans-Blot system (Bio-Rad). The blots were blocked with 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 1 h at room temperature and then incubated with anti-MyD88 (1:2500; catalogue number 4283, Cell Signaling Technology) and anti-IL-1RI (1:2000; Ab8154, Abcam) antibody overnight at 4 °C. Blots were then washed thrice using 1× TBST (1× Tris-buffered saline, pH 7.6, 0.1% Tween 20). Secondary antibody (anti-rabbit IgG-HRP (1:16,000; catalogue number 7074, Cell Signaling Technology) or anti-rat IgG-HRP (1:10,000; catalogue number 7077, Cell Signaling Technology)) was then added, and blots were incubated for 50 min at room temperature. Following three washes with TBST, blots were visualized using enhanced chemiluminescence reagent (Clarity ECL Western blotting substrate, Bio-Rad).

Cellular Uptake Assay of TIR-TcpC

For the in vivo cellular uptake assay, C57BL6/J mice (4 weeks old, male) were injected intravenously with FITC-conjugated BSA (FITC-BSA) or TIR-TcpC (FITC-TIR-TcpC) (5 mg/kg of body weight). Four hours later splenocytes were examined by flow cytometry for the FITC-positive population among dendritic cells (DCs) or T-cells (CD4+) using PE-anti-CD11c (1:100) and Alexa Fluor 700-anti-CD4 (1:100) antibodies.

For the in vitro assay, CD11c+ dendritic cells or naïve CD4+CD62L+ T-cells derived magnetically from spleen of C57BL6/J mice (4 weeks old, male, 0.1 million cells) were plated in poly-l-lysine-coated cell culture slides and treated with FITC-BSA, FITC-TIRRAR-TcpC, or FITC-TIR-TcpC (0.1 mg/ml) for 90 min. Cells were then washed, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, and mounted in Fluoroshield DAPI (Sigma), and images were acquired in a confocal microscope (LSM510 Meta).

Statistical Analysis

Multiple or binary comparisons were analyzed using analysis of variance (single factor) and Student's t test (unpaired, two-tailed), respectively. Differences in mean values were considered significant when p was <0.05.

Results

Uropathogenic E. coli-derived TIR-TcpC Ameliorates Collagen-induced Arthritis

TIR homologous domain (residues 1–137) of TcpC, an immunomodulatory protein secreted by uropathogenic E. coli CFT073 (9), was expressed recombinantly in a bacterial system (supplemental Fig. S1, A–F). Recombinant TIR-TcpC was analyzed for its biological activity in RAW-Blue cells, a mouse macrophage cell line that harbors an NFκB-inducible secreted embryonic alkaline phosphatase reporter construct. The treatment with TIR-TcpC inhibited lipopolysaccharide (TLR-4 ligand)-driven NFκB activation in a dosage-dependent manner with more than 50% reduction at a concentration of 2 μm. Surprisingly, the inhibitory potential of TIR-TcpC was several times greater than that of p65IP (commercially available positive control) (supplemental Fig. S2).To analyze the therapeutic effect of TIR-TcpC, autoimmune arthritis with characteristics similar to RA was induced in C57BL6/J mice by immunization with heterologous chicken type II collagen (CII). Nearly 70% of mice immunized with CII displayed joint inflammation on day 28 postimmunization. Upon clinical onset of the disease, mice were randomized into two experimental groups, viz. disease control and TIR-TcpC, and treated with vehicle or TIR-TcpC, respectively, for 2 weeks. An approximate 50% reduction in joint inflammation was readily evident (Fig. 1A and Table 1). Also, radiographs acquired at the end of the treatment period distinctly showed the absence of early signs of joint erosion in TIR-TcpC-treated animals (modified Larsen score = 0) that had begun in disease control mice (modified Larsen score = 1). Apart from integrity of joint surfaces, radiographs also revealed a drastic decrease in soft tissue volume (translucent regions around bones that essentially signify inflammatory edema) (Fig. 1B). An assessment of the serum biomarkers implicated in various disease processes such as inflammation, cartilage damage, and bone erosion was also carried out. The levels of proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β, TNF-α, and IL-6 were significantly reduced (Fig. 1, C–E). These proinflammatory cytokines are known to induce the release of soluble inflammatory mediators such as prostaglandins and leukotrienes. Furthermore, the levels of COMP, a component of the articular cartilage, and fragments of CII (CTX II), which are released into the circulation upon degradative action of MMPs, were found to be significantly low (Fig. 1, F and H). Low levels of COMP and CTX II were additionally a reflection of reduced activity of MMP-3 in line with its observed serum levels (Fig. 1G). The reduced levels of COMP, CTX II, and MMP-3 primarily indicated architectural conservation of the cartilaginous tissue, hence the protective effect of TIR-TcpC treatment. This was also an indication that the synovial lining in TIR-TcpC-treated mice had not been transformed into pannus, a hyperplastic aggressive tissue that is a rich source of matrix-degrading enzymes and cytokines. In another scenario, i.e. co-treatment, CII-immunized animals were treated with TIR-TcpC from days 0 to 14 postimmunization. In comparison with treatment, the mean arthritic score in both the experimental groups was lower, which essentially reflects disease-free survival in 25–30% of mice immunized with CII. In the co-treatment experiment, the severity of the arthritic score was found to be reduced by 70% in mice injected with TIR-TcpC. In addition to a reduction in disease severity, clinical onset of disease was delayed by ∼1 week (Fig. 1, I and J, and Table 1).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1.

TIR-TcpC treatment alleviates CIA. C57BL6/J mice (12–14 weeks old, male) were immunized intradermally with CII. On clinical onset, diseased mice were treated with TIR-TcpC (5 mg/kg of body weight) or vehicle (PBS) daily for 2 weeks. A, arthritic score (mean ± S.E.; n = 5; *, p < 0.05; data in the figure represent three independent experiments; error bars represent S.E.). B, radiographs (representative) acquired at the end of treatment period. C–H, levels of various disease markers, namely IL-1β (C) (mean ± S.D.; n = 5; *, p < 0.05), TNF-α (mean ± S.D.; n = 5; *, p < 0.05) (D), IL-6 (mean ± S.D.; n = 5; *, p < 0.05) (E), COMP (mean ± S.D.; n = 5; *, p < 0.05) (F), MMP-3 (mean ± S.D.; n = 5; *, p < 0.05) (G), CTX-II (mean ± S.D.; n = 5; *, p < 0.05) (H), in serum samples drawn at the end of the treatment period. Error bars in C–H represent S.D. C57BL6/J mice (12–14 weeks old, male) were immunized with CII and treated with TIR-TcpC (5 mg/kg of body weight) from days 0 to 14 postimmunization, and percent disease-free survival (I) and arthritic score (J) were determined (mean ± S.E. (n = 5); *, p < 0.05). Error bars represent S.D. Data in the figure represent three independent experiments. DC, disease control; FP, forepaw; HP, hind paw; ND, not detected; U/l, units per liter.

TABLE 1.

Effect of MyD88 deletion, TIR-TcpC treatment, and pretreatment: cumulative arthritic score (total arthritic score recorded over the entire experimental duration) and clinical onset of disease

graphic file with name zbc024164417t001.jpg

TIR-TcpC Treatment Impaired CD4+ T-cell Effector Functions

As CIA is a Th17 cell-mediated pathology (16), we examined the splenocytes of treated mice for various CD4+ T-cell subsets. To study the impact of TIR-TcpC treatment on effector T-cell functions, C57BL6/J mice were immunized with CII and on clinical onset of the disease were treated with TIR-TcpC. At the end of the treatment period (2 weeks), splenocytes were analyzed by flow cytometry for various CD4+ T-cell phenotypes such as Th1 (CD4+IFNγ+), Th2 (CD4+IL-4+), Th17 (CD4+Th17+), and Treg (CD4+FoxP3+). A significant reduction was noted in the proportion of Th1 and Th17 cells, whereas the proportions of other phenotypes remained unaltered (Fig. 2A). The findings of flow cytometric analysis were corroborated by the near-normal levels of IL-17A and IFNγ in the joint tissue homogenates of treated mice vis-à-vis untreated controls (Fig. 2B).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2.

TIR-TcpC impairs CD4+ T-cell effector functions. Splenocytes derived from C57BL6/J mice (12–14 weeks old, male) immunized with CII and treated with TIR-TcpC (5 mg/kg of body weight) from days 28 to 41 were analyzed by flow cytometry for Th1 (CD4+IFNγ+), Th2 (CD4+IL-4+), Th17 (CD4+IL-17A+), Treg (CD4+FoxP3+), and activated (CD4+CD69+) T-cells. A, representative FACS dot plots. B, levels of proinflammatory cytokines in joint tissue homogenates of TIR-TcpC-treated (5 mg/kg of body weight) or untreated (DC) animals (mean ± S.D.; n = 5; *, p < 0.05). Error bars in the figure represent S.D. Data in the figure represent three independent experiments. DC, disease control; FSC, forward scatter; SSC, side scatter.

Besides analyzing the effect of TIR-TcpC treatment on effector T-cell phenotypes, splenocytes of treated mice were also analyzed for activation. T-cell activation was assessed using the activation marker CD69. Surprisingly, the frequencies of CD4+CD69+ cells were comparable between TIR-TcpC treatment and control groups (Fig. 2A). Taken together, TIR-TcpC treatment blocked differentiation of naïve CD4+ T-cells into pathogenic phenotypes, i.e. Th1 and Th17. The observation therefore reflects the remarkable immunomodulatory property of TIR-TcpC in situ.

Mice with Complete or Cell-specific MyD88 Knockdown Are Resistant to CIA

TcpC has been shown previously to require an interaction with MyD88 for activity (9). To confirm the specificity of this interaction and hence the mechanism of action of TIR-TcpC, we performed pulldown assays in naïve CD4+ T-cells. The cells were activated and prestimulated with IL-1β for 90 min to increase the intracellular expression of MyD88. The pulldown assays revealed a specific interaction between MyD88 and purified TIR-TcpC that was concentration-dependent (Fig. 3). However, TIR-TcpC did not interact with type I IL-1 receptor, another member of the IL-1 signaling cascade. These results corroborate a previous report that highlighted interactions between the TIR domain of TcpC and MyD88 but not with other components of the TLR signaling pathway in RAW264.7 macrophages (9). Therefore, it was noteworthy to examine the effect of MyD88 deletion on the progression of CIA. For this, B6.MyD88−/− mice or their wild type counterparts were immunized with CII and monitored for joint inflammation. Although CIA progressed normally in the control group (wild type), MyD88−/− mice did not develop the disease at all (Fig. 4, A and B). Furthermore, the frequency of Th1 and Th17 cells was negligible in splenocytes when analyzed using flow cytometry at the end of 4 weeks postimmunization with CII (Fig. 4, C and D). Although the impact of TIR-TcpC treatment or MyD88 deletion on CD4+ T-cell differentiation and consequently on autoimmunity is through macrophages/dendritic cells (antigen-presenting cells) as expected, it was still important to examine the relative contribution of CD4+ T-cell- or CD11c+ dendritic cell-specific MyD88 on CIA and in situ T-cell differentiation. Mice with specific MyD88 deletion in CD4+ T-cells (MyD88ΔT) or CD11c+ dendritic cells (MyD88ΔM) were generated by crossing B6.MyD88flox/flox with B6.CD4-cre or B6.CD11c-cre, respectively. MyD88ΔT, MyD88ΔM, or wild type mice were immunized with CII. Although the percent incidence and clinical onset remained comparable, the severity of CIA in MyD88ΔT or MyD88ΔM mice was noted to be 60–65% lower than that of wild type controls (Fig. 4, A and B, and Table 1). Furthermore, flow cytometric analysis of splenocytes revealed a significant decrease in the frequency of Th17 cells in MyD88ΔT mice and MyD88ΔM mice, whereas relative proportions of Th1 cells were comparable between MyD88ΔT and wild type control (Fig. 4, C and D). Contrary to CD4+T-cells, CD11c+ dendritic cell-specific MyD88 deletion significantly down-modulated Th1 cell differentiation also (Fig. 4, C and D). For ex situ analysis, CD4+CD62L+ naïve T-cells were isolated from MyD88−/− or wild type mice and subjected to Th17 differentiation conditions. In line with in situ differentiation analysis, naïve T-cells derived from MyD88−/− mice showed negligible differentiation into Th17 cells and were unresponsive to IL-1β treatment (Fig. 4, E and F). To summarize, although MyD88 deletion limited to CD4+ T-cells or CD11c+ dendritic cells significantly impairs Th17 cell differentiation, complete knockdown of MyD88 totally abrogates Th17 development and hence CIA.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3.

TIR-TcpC interacts specifically with MyD88. Concentrated lysates of naïve CD4+CD62L+ T-cells (protein concentration, 50 μg/ml) stimulated with IL-1β (10 ng/ml) were subjected to co-immunoprecipitation using the Profinity eXact-tagged TIR-TcpC (total protein, 0, 10, and 100 μg) and S189-agarose bead system (described under “Experimental Procedures”). Proteins co-immunoprecipitated with TIR-TcpC were analyzed for the presence of MyD88 or IL-1RI by Western blotting. Total lysate loaded (Input) served as a control for expression of MyD88 and IL-1RI in the lysates. Data in the figure represent three independent experiments.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4.

MyD88 deficiency impairs Th17 cell differentiation and development of CIA. MyD88−/−, MyD88ΔT, MyD88ΔM, or wild type C57BL6/J mice (12–14 weeks old, male) were immunized with CII, and percent disease-free survival (A) and arthritic score (B) were determined (mean ± S.E.; n = 5; *, p < 0.05). Error bars represent S.E. Data in the figure represents three independent experiments. C, frequencies of Th1 (CD4+IFNγ+)/Th17 (CD4+ IL-17A+) cells in spleen analyzed by flow cytometry on day 28 postimmunization (mean ± S.D.; n = 3; *, p < 0.05). Error bars represent S.D. D, representative FACS dot plots. CD4+CD62L+ naïve T-cells isolated from MyD88−/− or wild type C57BL6/J mice (4–6 weeks old, male) were cultured in Th17-polarizing conditions (described under “Experimental Procedures”) in the presence or absence of IL-1β (10 ng/ml). E, frequencies (mean ± S.D.; n = 3; *, p < 0.05). Error bars represent S.D. F, representative FACS dot plots.

TIR-TcpC Blocks IL-1β-dependent Th17 Cell Differentiation

The impaired CD4+ T-cell differentiation and autoimmunity, particularly in MyD88ΔT animals, prompted us to examine the direct effect of TIR-TcpC treatment on Th17 cell development. First of all the effect of proinflammatory cytokines, i.e. IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α, the levels of which were found to be down-modulated in treated joints, was studied on in vitro Th17 differentiation. As reported previously (15), the presence of IL-1β in the differentiation milieu significantly enhanced Th17 cell differentiation, whereas TNF-α had no effect (Fig. 5, A and B). The frequency of Th17 cells was negligible when IL-6 was not included in the differentiation mixture, signifying its indispensable role in Th17 cell differentiation (Fig. 5, A and B). Surprisingly, TIR-TcpC treatment had an inhibitory effect only when IL-1β was included in the differentiation mixture (Fig. 5, A and B). In conclusion, TIR-TcpC treatment blocked only the IL-1β-mediated increase in Th17 cell differentiation.

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5.

TIR-TcpC treatment blocks IL-1β-dependent RORγt activation and Th17 cell differentiation. Naïve CD4+CD62L+ T-cells isolated from spleen of C57BL6/J mice (4–6 weeks old, male) were subjected to Th17-polarizing conditions (described under “Experimental Procedures”) in the presence or absence (control) of IL-1β (10 ng/ml), TNF-α (10 ng/ml), IL-6 (40 ng/ml), and/or TIR-TcpC (1 mg/ml) and analyzed by flow cytometry for the expression of IL-17/IFNγ (Th1/Th17). A, representative FACS dot plots. B, frequencies (mean ± S.D.; n = 3; *, p < 0.05). C, IL-1RI (CD121a) representative histogram and RORγt representative dot plots. Error bars in the figure represent S.D. FSC, forward scatter; SSC, side scatter.

The detrimental effect of TIR-TcpC treatment on IL-1β-mediated Th17 cell differentiation was analyzed in further detail. Expression of IL-1RI is essential for IL-1 activity. Thus, naïve CD4+ T-cells treated with IL-1β in the presence of TIR-TcpC were analyzed for surface expression of CD121a (IL-1RI). Flow cytometric analysis revealed no significant difference in the expression of IL-1RI (Fig. 5C). This was also indicative of intact IL-6 signaling even in the presence of TIR-TcpC as the former is known to be a critical factor for IL-1RI up-regulation during polarization (15). Furthermore, TIR-TcpC-treated naïve CD4+ T-cells were noted to express lower levels of RORγt (master transcription factor involved in Th17 differentiation (17)) vis-à-vis the untreated control (Fig. 5C).

C-terminal Arg-Arg-Arg Motif Is Critical for Translocation across Cell Membrane

Cirl et al. (9) have shown internalization and subsequent blocking activity of TIR-TcpC to be My D88-dependent in uroepithelial cells and macrophages. Because endocytic uptake of protein antigens is relatively unknown in the case of helper T-cells, it was intriguing to explore the mechanism of its entry. A careful analysis of the TIR-TcpC sequence revealed the presence of three consecutive arginine residues (arginines 135–137) at the C terminus (supplemental Fig. S1G). Numerous studies in the past have highlighted the remarkable property of cationic peptides especially polyarginine to penetrate cell membranes. We, therefore, hypothesized the arginine triplet (arginines 135–137) to mediate cell penetration of TIR-TcpC. To test this, we generated a variant of TIR-TcpC in which the arginine triplet (Arg-Arg-Arg) was mutated to Arg-Ala-Arg, designated as TIRRAR-TcpC, to see whether the consecutive triple arginine is necessary for internalization (supplemental Fig. S1G). Spleen-derived CD11c+ dendritic cells or CD4+CD62L+ naïve T-cells were treated with fluorescently labeled TIR-TcpC, TIRRAR-TcpC, or BSA (control) and analyzed by confocal microscopy. TIR-TcpC could readily be observed more or less evenly distributed in the cytosol of dendritic cells and naïve T-cells, whereas TIRRAR-TcpC could not enter the cytosol (Fig. 6A). Furthermore, to study the uptake of TIR-TcpC in vivo, C57BL6/J mice (4–6 weeks old, male) were injected with FITC-TIR-TcpC, and 4 h later CD11c+ DCs and CD4+ T-cells in spleen were analyzed for the FITC+ population by FACS. Significant proportions among DCs and T-cells were noted to be positive for FITC (Fig. 6B). To analyze its impact on NFκB activation, naïve CD4+CD62L+ T-cells were stimulated with IL-1β in the presence of TIR-TcpC or TIRRAR-TcpC. NFκB activation was quantified as described under “Experimental Procedures.” As expected, the IL-1/MyD88-mediated NFκB activation was persistent in the presence of TIRRAR-TcpC, also suggesting its failure to translocate across the plasma membrane and subsequently prevent IL-1/MyD88 interaction through their TIR domains (Fig. 6C). However, it was also important to see that the observed abrogation of activity is not an outcome of mutation-induced structural changes in TIRRAR-TcpC. For this, the tyrosine fluorescence spectrum was recorded. TIR-TcpC and TIRRAR-TcpC showed exact spectral overlap, signifying minimal structural perturbations in TIRRAR-TcpC (Fig. 6D). Furthermore, TIR-TcpC and TIRRAR-TcpC sequences were cloned into a mammalian expression vector, electroporated into murine CD4+CD62L+ T-cells, and probed for their ability to block IL-1 signaling-dependent NFκB activation. Both were found to be comparable in inhibiting NFκB activation (Fig. 6E). Thus, from these experiments, we concluded that the Arg-Arg-Arg motif is critical for its translocation through the cell membrane.

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6.

C-terminal Arg-Arg-Arg motif is critical for translocation across cell membrane. CD11c+ dendritic cells or CD4+CD62L+ (naïve) T-cells isolated from spleen of C57BL6/J mice (male, 4–6 weeks old) were treated with FITC-TIR-TcpC (TIR), FITC-TIRRAR-TcpC (TIRRAR), FITC-BSA (BSA) (0.1 mg/ml), and/or methyl-β-cyclodextrin (MβCD) (10 mm). A, representative confocal photomicrographs acquired 90 min post-treatment. Scale bars, 5 μm.C57BL6/J mice (male, 4–6 weeks old) were injected intravenously with FITC-BSA or FITC-TIR-TcpC (5 mg/kg of body weight), and 4 h later dendritic cells (CD11c+) or T-cells (CD4+) in spleen were analyzed by flow cytometry for the presence of fluorescent protein. B, representative FACS dot plots. C, NFκB activity in nuclear fractions of naïve T-cells stimulated with IL-1β (10 ng/ml) in the presence of TIR-TcpC (1 mg/ml) (mean ± S.D.; n = 3; *, p < 0.05). D, tyrosine fluorescence (excitation wavelength, 275 nm) spectra (290–500 nm) of TIR-TcpC and TIRRAR-TcpC. E, NFκB activity in nuclear fractions of IL-1β-stimulated CD4+CD62L+ T-cells transfected with TIR-TcpC or TIRRAR-TcpC constructs (mean ± S.D.; n = 3; *, p < 0.05). F, NFκB activity in nuclear fractions of methyl-β-cyclodextrin (10 mm)-treated naïve T-cells upon stimulation with IL-1β (10 ng/ml) in the presence of TIR-TcpC (1 mg/ml) (mean ± S.D.; n = 3; *, p < 0.05). Error bars in the figure represent S.D. FSC, forward scatter; SSC, side scatter; ns, not significant; DIC, differential interference contrast.

Several virulence factors, polycationic peptides (polyarginines), have been shown to be internalized into living cells via endocytosis and/or through lipid rafts (18). To explore the role of lipid rafts and/or endocytosis in the entry of TIR-TcpC, naïve T-cells treated with methyl-β-cyclodextrin (a cholesterol-extracting reagent that disrupts lipid rafts) were examined for IL-1β-dependent activation of NFκB. Methyl-β-cyclodextrin prevented TIR-TcpC-mediated suppression of NFκB activation (IL-1-driven) (Fig. 6F).

TIR-TcpC Treatment Does Not Generate Neutralizing Immune Response

To determine whether TIR-TcpC treatment generates a neutralizing immune response, serum samples drawn at the end of the treatment period were analyzed for antibody titer. Also, splenocytes isolated at the end of the treatment period were examined for proliferative activity in response to TIR-TcpC stimulation. Both anti-TIR-TcpC titer and TIR-TcpC-specific proliferative response were noted to be close to untreated controls, whereas the proliferative response to CII stimulation was high (Fig. 7, A and B).

FIGURE 7.

FIGURE 7.

TIR-TcpC treatment does not generate neutralizing immune response. C57BL6/J mice (12–14 weeks old, male) were immunized with CII and treated with TIR-TcpC (5 mg/kg of body weight) or vehicle from days 0 to 14. A, anti-TIR-TcpC antibody titer. B and C, proliferative activity of splenocytes in response to in vitro CII (50 μg/ml) (B) or TIR-TcpC (50 μg/ml) (C). Proliferation in response to anti-CD3 (100 ng/ml) was used as a positive control (mean ± S.D.; n = 3; *, p < 0.05). Error bars in the figure represent S.D.

Discussion

The present study utilized an immunomodulatory protein of bacterial origin, TIR-TcpC, known for active subversion of MyD88-dependent TLR signaling pathway, to underscore the functional relevance of MyD88 in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (9, 11). Surprisingly, TIR-TcpC was not only instrumental in delineating the precise contribution of MyD88 to RA pathology, but it also emerged as a promising therapeutic molecule targeting multiple pathways simultaneously. It drastically suppressed several aspects of arthritis in terms of inflammation, cartilage damage, and bone erosion. Although treatment with TIR-TcpC reduced the articular score by 50–60%, it is likely that prolonged treatment or higher dosages would have further suppressed the inflammatory disease processes. As TIR-TcpC has been shown to be as effective as full-length protein, TIR-TcpC was used in our study (9). Th17 cells, a subset of the CD4+ helper T-cell lineage, have emerged as key contributors to the disease processes in RA as well as in CIA (1922). In humans a strong correlation between systemic disease activity and the circulating levels of IL-17 and Th17 cells has been reported in RA patients wherein IL-17 promotes joint destruction and bone resorption; in CIA neutralization of IL-17 has been found to be protective against disease development, and its overexpression is associated with a spontaneous and more severe form of autoimmune arthritis (2329). Consistent with this, abrogation of Th17 responses by TIR-TcpC led to a significant limitation of the arthritic processes.

The observed defect in Th17 function induced by TIR-TcpC was determined to be an outcome of inhibition of various proinflammatory signaling cascades involving MyD88. Furthermore, TIR-TcpC affected the differentiation of Th17 cells in a drastic manner with modest effects on Th1 cells. This is in agreement with recent reports that highlight increased expression of MyD88-dependent receptors IL-1R and TLRs on Th17 cells vis-à-vis Th1 cells (15, 30). Moreover, these receptors are intricately involved in generation of Th17 cells in an indirect (31) as well as direct manner (15, 30, 32). Acting in an indirect manner, these pathways activate innate immune cells, particularly antigen-presenting cells, which in turn potently stimulate adaptive immune responses (3234). On the other hand, evidence also suggests a direct action of MyD88-dependent (IL-1 and TLR) pathways on CD4+ T-cells and promotion of their differentiation into Th17 cells (15, 30). It is noteworthy that the MyD88-dependent IL-1 and TLR pathways are not only important for Th17 differentiation but also have a significant contribution in the onset and progression of RA through other mechanisms. Elevated levels of various TLRs such as TLR-2, -3, -4, and -7 and their ligands such as bacterial DNA, peptidoglycans, heat shock proteins, fibronectin fragments, etc. have been observed in rheumatoid synovium in RA patients; these in addition to viral infections are implicated in disease initiation and progression (3542). Conversely, IL-1 is a well established therapeutic target in RA (4345). Elevated levels of IL-1, with a positive correlation with disease activity, have been detected in the plasma and synovial fluid of RA patients (46, 47). In animal models, IL-1 appears to be the main contributor toward disease pathogenesis (13, 4850).

Thus, TIR-TcpC targeted MyD88-dependent signaling in both innate and adaptive immune cells to provide a comprehensive inhibition of Th17 differentiation in vivo.

TIR-TcpC-induced inhibition of the IL-1/MyD88 pathway resulted in impairment of NFκB activation, expression of RORγt, and subsequent Th17 differentiation, which is in line with a recent report that highlights the importance of p65 activity within CD4+ T-cells for induction of optimal Th17 responses through the up-regulation of RORγt (51). Notably, TIR-TcpC was added during early stages of lineage commitment, which indicated that early MyD88 signaling is essential for Th17 generation and is in agreement with recent reports that highlight the importance of IL-1 signaling during early stages of Th17 differentiation (15). It could also be inferred that NFκB activation during early stages of differentiation is important for optimal Th17 differentiation.

Although a few sporadic reports had pointed out an indirect involvement of MyD88 (based on the studies in mice deficient in MyD88-dependent TLRs) in the pathogenesis of RA, direct evidence and/or underlying mechanisms have so far remained elusive (5254). Addressing this ambiguity, the present study attempts to emphasize the unforeseen role of MyD88 as a valuable therapeutic target in RA. The absence of CIA in MyD88−/− mice was a clear indicator of the absolute necessity of this molecule for the induction of arthritic processes. MyD88 deletion (complete or cell-specific) was associated with deficient or defective Th17 development both in vivo and in vitro. In the case of CD4+ cell-specific MyD88 deletion, the defect could be the result of impaired IL-1-induced NFκB activation during early stages of development as apparent from experiments with TIR-TcpC. However, this needs further investigation. Other possible explanations of the observed defect could be impaired IL-23R expression and inability of naïve CD4+ T-cells to overcome Treg-mediated suppression as highlighted in studies by Chang et al. (14) and Schenten et al. (55), respectively. The present study, therefore, brings into light the importance of targeting CD4+ T-cell-specific MyD88 in controlling the differentiation of autoreactive Th17 cells and subsequently RA pathogenesis.

It could be argued that TIR-TcpC is less efficient than gene knock-outs. Several factors may account for the observed difference. For example, limited biological half-life may affect the complete blockade of MyD88 in target cells. Consequently, resurgence of proinflammatory responses during drug-free intervals between two consecutive dosages could also contribute to the limited in vivo efficacy of TIR-TcpC. It could also be a matter of timing of treatment as disease processes in arthritis are continuous. Hence, early, sustained, and prolonged treatment regimens are likely to be more effective at near-complete blockade of MyD88 signaling, which may require the use of suitable delivery vehicles such as osmotic pumps, nanoparticles, etc. and are beyond the scope of the present study. It is also likely that use of high initial dosages could result in an improvement in MyD88 blockade.

Interestingly, we did not find any compromise in the entry of TIR-TcpC into target cells as revealed through in vitro cellular internalization experiments in dendritic and CD4+ T-cells. Furthermore, the interaction of TIR-TcpC was very specific for MyD88 as we did not find any interaction with IL-1R.

Notably, the inhibitory activity of TIR-TcpC was dependent on its cellular entry. TIR-TcpC crossed the plasma membrane through cholesterol-rich lipid rafts and its entry was similar to the internalization of arginine rich polycationic peptides which is in corroboration with a previously published report (9).

Taking into account the central role of Th17 lymphocytes in RA, disruption of pathogenic processes leading to their generation is highly desirable. TIR-TcpC, herein, emerged as a potent anti-arthritic molecule capable of arresting disease processes in terms of initiation and progression in an effective manner, which it did so by controlling Th17 cell responses both in vivo and in vitro, through regulation of the common adaptor molecule MyD88.

Author Contributions

S. P. and R. K. contributed equally to the study. S. P., R. K., and A. S. conceived and designed the study. A. S. provided the entire infrastructure and supported the research. S. P. and R. K. performed experiments, analyzed data, and wrote the manuscript. A. S. reviewed the manuscript. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Data

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Prafullakumar B. Tailor for providing a breeding pair of CD11c-cre mice, Dr. P. Nagarajan for valuable input on mice breeding experiments, Drs. Sarika Gupta and Anil Suri for allowing access to laboratory space, and T. Khaling and Kapil Manglani for technical help in acquisition of FACS and confocal data, respectively. We also thank Prof. William J. Whelan, University of Miami School of Medicine and Prof. Angelo Azzi, Tufts University, Boston, MA for proofreading the manuscript.

*

This work was supported by a grant from the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), India (to A. S.). The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article.

Inline graphic

This article contains supplemental Figs. S1 and S2.

4
The abbreviations used are:
RA
rheumatoid arthritis
TLR
toll-like receptor
TIR
toll/interleukin-1 receptor
IL-1R
IL-1 receptor
CIA
collagen-induced arthritis
DC
dendritic cell
EGFP
enhanced GFP
COMP
cartilage oligomeric matrix protein
CTX II
C-terminal telopeptides of collagen type II
MMP
matrix metalloproteinase
PE
phycoerythrin
CII
chicken type II collagen
Treg
regulatory T-cell
RORγt
RAR-related orphan receptor γt.

References

  • 1. Bingham C. O., 3rd. (2002) The pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis: pivotal cytokines involved in bone degradation and inflammation. J. Rheumatol. Suppl. 65, 3–9 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Choy E., Taylor P., McAuliffe S., Roberts K., and Sargeant I. (2012) Variation in the use of biologics in the management of rheumatoid arthritis across the UK. Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 28, 1733–1741 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Lord K. A., Hoffman-Liebermann B., and Liebermann D. A. (1990) Nucleotide sequence and expression of a cDNA encoding MyD88, a novel myeloid differentiation primary response gene induced by IL6. Oncogene 5, 1095–1097 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Warner N., and Núñez G. (2013) MyD88: a critical adaptor protein in innate immunity signal transduction. J. Immunol. 190, 3–4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Hardiman G., Rock F. L., Balasubramanian S., Kastelein R. A., and Bazan J. F. (1996) Molecular characterization and modular analysis of human MyD88. Oncogene 13, 2467–2475 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Park H. H., Lo Y. C., Lin S. C., Wang L., Yang J. K., and Wu H. (2007) The death domain superfamily in intracellular signaling of apoptosis and inflammation. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 25, 561–586 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Hultmark D. (1994) Macrophage differentiation marker MyD88 is a member of the Toll/IL-1 receptor family. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 199, 144–146 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Ohnishi H., Tochio H., Kato Z., Orii K. E., Li A., Kimura T., Hiroaki H., Kondo N., and Shirakawa M. (2009) Structural basis for the multiple interactions of the MyD88 TIR domain in TLR4 signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 10260–10265 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Cirl C., Wieser A., Yadav M., Duerr S., Schubert S., Fischer H., Stappert D., Wantia N., Rodriguez N., Wagner H., Svanborg C., and Miethke T. (2008) Subversion of Toll-like receptor signaling by a unique family of bacterial Toll/interleukin-1 receptor domain-containing proteins. Nat. Med. 14, 399–406 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Snyder G. A., Cirl C., Jiang J., Chen K., Waldhuber A., Smith P., Römmler F., Snyder N., Fresquez T., Dürr S., Tjandra N., Miethke T., and Xiao T. S. (2013) Molecular mechanisms for the subversion of MyD88 signaling by TcpC from virulent uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 6985–6990 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Yadav M., Zhang J., Fischer H., Huang W., Lutay N., Cirl C., Lum J., Miethke T., and Svanborg C. (2010) Inhibition of TIR domain signaling by TcpC: MyD88-dependent and independent effects on Escherichia coli virulence. PLoS Pathog. 6, e1001120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Inglis J. J., Criado G., Medghalchi M., Andrews M., Sandison A., Feldmann M., and Williams R. O. (2007) Collagen-induced arthritis in C57BL/6 mice is associated with a robust and sustained T-cell response to type II collagen. Arthritis Res. Ther. 9, R113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Pasi S., Kant R., Gupta S., and Surolia A. (2015) Novel multimeric IL-1 receptor antagonist for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Biomaterials 42, 121–133 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Chang J., Burkett P. R., Borges C. M., Kuchroo V. K., Turka L. A., and Chang C. H. (2013) MyD88 is essential to sustain mTOR activation necessary to promote T helper 17 cell proliferation by linking IL-1 and IL-23 signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 2270–2275 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Chung Y., Chang S. H., Martinez G. J., Yang X. O., Nurieva R., Kang H. S., Ma L., Watowich S. S., Jetten A. M., Tian Q., and Dong C. (2009) Critical regulation of early Th17 cell differentiation by interleukin-1 signaling. Immunity 30, 576–587 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Nakae S., Nambu A., Sudo K., and Iwakura Y. (2003) Suppression of immune induction of collagen-induced arthritis in IL-17-deficient mice. J. Immunol. 171, 6173–6177 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Ivanov I. I., McKenzie B. S., Zhou L., Tadokoro C. E., Lepelley A., Lafaille J. J., Cua D. J., and Littman D. R. (2006) The orphan nuclear receptor RORγt directs the differentiation program of proinflammatory IL-17+ T helper cells. Cell. 126, 1121–1133 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Zorko M., and Langel U. (2005) Cell-penetrating peptides: mechanism and kinetics of cargo delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 57, 529–545 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Leipe J., Grunke M., Dechant C., Reindl C., Kerzendorf U., Schulze-Koops H., and Skapenko A. (2010) Role of Th17 cells in human autoimmune arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 62, 2876–2885 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Sarkar S., Cooney L. A., and Fox D. A. (2010) The role of T helper type 17 cells in inflammatory arthritis. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 159, 225–237 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Sarkar S., and Fox D. A. (2010) Targeting IL-17 and Th17 cells in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheum. Dis. Clin. North Am. 36, 345–366 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Tesmer L. A., Lundy S. K., Sarkar S., and Fox D. A. (2008) Th17 cells in human disease. Immunol. Rev. 223, 87–113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Chu C. Q., Song Z., Mayton L., Wu B., and Wooley P. H. (2003) IFNγ deficient C57BL/6 (H-2b) mice develop collagen induced arthritis with predominant usage of T cell receptor Vβ6 and Vβ8 in arthritic joints. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 62, 983–990 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Chu C. Q., Swart D., Alcorn D., Tocker J., and Elkon K. B. (2007) Interferon-γ regulates susceptibility to collagen-induced arthritis through suppression of interleukin-17. Arthritis Rheum. 56, 1145–1151 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Lubberts E., Koenders M. I., Oppers-Walgreen B., van den Bersselaar L., Coenen-de Roo C. J., Joosten L. A., and van den Berg W. B. (2004) Treatment with a neutralizing anti-murine interleukin-17 antibody after the onset of collagen-induced arthritis reduces joint inflammation, cartilage destruction, and bone erosion. Arthritis Rheum. 50, 650–659 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Manoury-Schwartz B., Chiocchia G., Bessis N., Abehsira-Amar O., Batteux F., Muller S., Huang S., Boissier M. C., and Fournier C. (1997) High susceptibility to collagen-induced arthritis in mice lacking IFN-γ receptors. J. Immunol. 158, 5501–5506 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Sato K., Suematsu A., Okamoto K., Yamaguchi A., Morishita Y., Kadono Y., Tanaka S., Kodama T., Akira S., Iwakura Y., Cua D. J., and Takayanagi H. (2006) Th17 functions as an osteoclastogenic helper T cell subset that links T cell activation and bone destruction. J. Exp. Med. 203, 2673–2682 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Shen H., Goodall J. C., and Hill Gaston J. S. (2009) Frequency and phenotype of peripheral blood Th17 cells in ankylosing spondylitis and rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 60, 1647–1656 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. van Hamburg J. P., Asmawidjaja P. S., Davelaar N., Mus A. M., Colin E. M., Hazes J. M., Dolhain R. J., and Lubberts E. (2011) Th17 cells, but not Th1 cells, from patients with early rheumatoid arthritis are potent inducers of matrix metalloproteinases and proinflammatory cytokines upon synovial fibroblast interaction, including autocrine interleukin-17A production. Arthritis Rheum. 63, 73–83 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Reynolds J. M., Pappu B. P., Peng J., Martinez G. J., Zhang Y., Chung Y., Ma L., Yang X. O., Nurieva R. I., Tian Q., and Dong C. (2010) Toll-like receptor 2 signaling in CD4+ T lymphocytes promotes T helper 17 responses and regulates the pathogenesis of autoimmune disease. Immunity 32, 692–702 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Janssens S., and Beyaert R. (2002) A universal role for MyD88 in TLR/IL-1R-mediated signaling. Trends Biochem. Sci. 27, 474–482 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Aliahmadi E., Gramlich R., Grützkau A., Hitzler M., Krüger M., Baumgrass R., Schreiner M., Wittig B., Wanner R., and Peiser M. (2009) TLR2-activated human Langerhans cells promote Th17 polarization via IL-1β, TGF-β and IL-23. Eur. J. Immunol. 39, 1221–1230 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Eriksson U., Kurrer M. O., Sonderegger I., Iezzi G., Tafuri A., Hunziker L., Suzuki S., Bachmaier K., Bingisser R. M., Penninger J. M., and Kopf M. (2003) Activation of dendritic cells through the interleukin 1 receptor 1 is critical for the induction of autoimmune myocarditis. J. Exp. Med. 197, 323–331 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Luft T., Jefford M., Luetjens P., Hochrein H., Masterman K. A., Maliszewski C., Shortman K., Cebon J., and Maraskovsky E. (2002) IL-1β enhances CD40 ligand-mediated cytokine secretion by human dendritic cells (DC): a mechanism for T cell-independent DC activation. J. Immunol. 168, 713–722 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Ospelt C., Brentano F., Rengel Y., Stanczyk J., Kolling C., Tak P. P., Gay R. E., Gay S., and Kyburz D. (2008) Overexpression of toll-like receptors 3 and 4 in synovial tissue from patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: toll-like receptor expression in early and longstanding arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 58, 3684–3692 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Radstake T. R., Roelofs M. F., Jenniskens Y. M., Oppers-Walgreen B., van Riel P. L., Barrera P., Joosten L. A., and van den Berg W. B. (2004) Expression of toll-like receptors 2 and 4 in rheumatoid synovial tissue and regulation by proinflammatory cytokines interleukin-12 and interleukin-18 via interferon-γ. Arthritis Rheum. 50, 3856–3865 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Roelofs M. F., Boelens W. C., Joosten L. A., Abdollahi-Roodsaz S., Geurts J., Wunderink L. U., Schreurs B. W., van den Berg W. B., and Radstake T. R. (2006) Identification of small heat shock protein B8 (HSP22) as a novel TLR4 ligand and potential involvement in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. J. Immunol. 176, 7021–7027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Roelofs M. F., Joosten L. A., Abdollahi-Roodsaz S., van Lieshout A. W., Sprong T., van den Hoogen F. H., van den Berg W. B., and Radstake T. R. (2005) The expression of toll-like receptors 3 and 7 in rheumatoid arthritis synovium is increased and costimulation of toll-like receptors 3, 4, and 7/8 results in synergistic cytokine production by dendritic cells. Arthritis Rheum. 52, 2313–2322 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Saal J. G., Krimmel M., Steidle M., Gerneth F., Wagner S., Fritz P., Koch S., Zacher J., Sell S., Einsele H., and Müller C. A. (1999) Synovial Epstein-Barr virus infection increases the risk of rheumatoid arthritis in individuals with the shared HLA-DR4 epitope. Arthritis Rheum. 42, 1485–1496 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Saal J. G., Steidle M., Einsele H., Müller C. A., Fritz P., and Zacher J. (1992) Persistence of B19 parvovirus in synovial membranes of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatol. Int. 12, 147–151 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. van der Heijden I. M., Wilbrink B., Tchetverikov I., Schrijver I. A., Schouls L. M., Hazenberg M. P., Breedveld F. C., and Tak P. P. (2000) Presence of bacterial DNA and bacterial peptidoglycans in joints of patients with rheumatoid arthritis and other arthritides. Arthritis Rheum. 43, 593–598 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Walle T. K., Vartio T., Helve T., Virtanen I., and Kurki P. (1990) Cellular fibronectin in rheumatoid synovium and synovial fluid: a possible factor contributing to lymphocytic infiltration. Scand. J. Immunol. 31, 535–540 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Braddock M., and Quinn A. (2004) Targeting IL-1 in inflammatory disease: new opportunities for therapeutic intervention. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 3, 330–339 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Braddock M., Quinn A., and Canvin J. (2004) Therapeutic potential of targeting IL-1 and IL-18 in inflammation. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 4, 847–860 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Bresnihan B., Alvaro-Gracia J. M., Cobby M., Doherty M., Domljan Z., Emery P., Nuki G., Pavelka K., Rau R., Rozman B., Watt I., Williams B., Aitchison R., McCabe D., and Musikic P. (1998) Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with recombinant human interleukin-1 receptor antagonist. Arthritis Rheum. 41, 2196–2204 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Eastgate J. A., Symons J. A., Wood N. C., Grinlinton F. M., di Giovine F. S., and Duff G. W. (1988) Correlation of plasma interleukin 1 levels with disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet 2, 706–709 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Kahle P., Saal J. G., Schaudt K., Zacher J., Fritz P., and Pawelec G. (1992) Determination of cytokines in synovial fluids: correlation with diagnosis and histomorphological characteristics of synovial tissue. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 51, 731–734 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Horai R., Saijo S., Tanioka H., Nakae S., Sudo K., Okahara A., Ikuse T., Asano M., and Iwakura Y. (2000) Development of chronic inflammatory arthropathy resembling rheumatoid arthritis in interleukin 1 receptor antagonist-deficient mice. J. Exp. Med. 191, 313–320 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Joosten L. A., Helsen M. M., van de Loo F. A., and van den Berg W. B. (1996) Anticytokine treatment of established type II collagen-induced arthritis in DBA/1 mice. A comparative study using anti-TNFα, anti-IL-1α/β, and IL-1Ra. Arthritis Rheum. 39, 797–809 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. van den Berg W. B., Joosten L. A., Kollias G., and van De Loo F. A. (1999) Role of tumour necrosis factor α in experimental arthritis: separate activity of interleukin 1β in chronicity and cartilage destruction. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 58, Suppl. 1, I40–I48 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Ruan Q., Kameswaran V., Zhang Y., Zheng S., Sun J., Wang J., DeVirgiliis J., Liou H. C., Beg A. A., and Chen Y. H. (2011) The Th17 immune response is controlled by the Rel-RORγ-RORγT transcriptional axis. J. Exp. Med. 208, 2321–2333 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Abdollahi-Roodsaz S., Joosten L. A., Koenders M. I., Devesa I., Roelofs M. F., Radstake T. R., Heuvelmans-Jacobs M., Akira S., Nicklin M. J., Ribeiro-Dias F., and van den Berg W. B. (2008) Stimulation of TLR2 and TLR4 differentially skews the balance of T cells in a mouse model of arthritis. J. Clin. Investig. 118, 205–216 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Pierer M., Wagner U., Rossol M., and Ibrahim S. (2011) Toll-like receptor 4 is involved in inflammatory and joint destructive pathways in collagen-induced arthritis in DBA1J mice. PLoS One 6, e23539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Sacre S. M., Andreakos E., Kiriakidis S., Amjadi P., Lundberg A., Giddins G., Feldmann M., Brennan F., and Foxwell B. M. (2007) The Toll-like receptor adaptor proteins MyD88 and Mal/TIRAP contribute to the inflammatory and destructive processes in a human model of rheumatoid arthritis. Am. J. Pathol. 170, 518–525 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Schenten D., Nish S. A., Yu S., Yan X., Lee H. K., Brodsky I., Pasman L., Yordy B., Wunderlich F. T., Brüning J. C., Zhao H., and Medzhitov R. (2014) Signaling through the adaptor molecule MyD88 in CD4+ T cells is required to overcome suppression by regulatory T cells. Immunity 40, 78–90 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Data

Articles from The Journal of Biological Chemistry are provided here courtesy of American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

RESOURCES