Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1992 Jun 15;89(12):5620–5624. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.12.5620

Coevolution of genes and languages revisited.

L L Cavalli-Sforza 1, E Minch 1, J L Mountain 1
PMCID: PMC49344  PMID: 1608971

Abstract

In an earlier paper it was shown that linguistic families of languages spoken by a set of 38 populations associate rather strongly with an evolutionary tree of the same populations derived from genetic data. While the correlation was clearly high, there was no evaluation of statistical significance; no such test was available at the time. This gap has now been filled by adapting to this aim a procedure based on the consistency index, and the level of significance is found to be much stronger than 10(-3). Possible reasons for coevolution of strictly genetic characters and the strictly cultural linguistic system are discussed briefly. Results of this global analysis are compared with those obtained in independent local analysis.

Full text

PDF

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cavalli-Sforza L. L., Piazza A., Menozzi P., Mountain J. Reconstruction of human evolution: bringing together genetic, archaeological, and linguistic data. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Aug;85(16):6002–6006. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.16.6002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Karlin S., Kenett R., Bonné-Tamir B. Analysis of biochemical genetic data on Jewish populations: II. Results and interpretations of heterogeneity indices and distance measures with respect to standards. Am J Hum Genet. 1979 May;31(3):341–365. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kimura M, Weiss G H. The Stepping Stone Model of Population Structure and the Decrease of Genetic Correlation with Distance. Genetics. 1964 Apr;49(4):561–576. doi: 10.1093/genetics/49.4.561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Mantel N. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res. 1967 Feb;27(2):209–220. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. O'Grady R. T., Goddard I., Bateman R. M., DiMichele W. A., Funk V. A., Kress W. J., Mooi R., Cannell P. F. Genes and tongues. Science. 1989 Mar 31;243(4899):1651–1651. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Wright S. Isolation by Distance. Genetics. 1943 Mar;28(2):114–138. doi: 10.1093/genetics/28.2.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Zei G., Guglielmino C. R., Siri E., Moroni A., Cavalli-Sforza L. L. Surnames as neutral alleles: observations in Sardinia. Hum Biol. 1983 May;55(2):357–365. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES