Skip to main content
Annals of Botany logoLink to Annals of Botany
. 2016 Jul 5;118(1):89–91. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcw147

Orchid conservation: further links

Michael F Fay 1,2,*
PMCID: PMC4934403  PMID: 27385771

Abstract

Background: Due in great part to their often complex interactions with mycorrhizal fungi, pollinators and host trees, Orchidaceae present particular challenges for conservation. Furthermore, orchids, as potentially the largest family of angiosperms with >26000 species, species complexes and frequent hybrid formation, are complex to catalogue. Following a highlight in 2015, a further seven papers focusing on orchids, their interactions with beneficial organisms, pollinators and mycorrhiza, and other factors relating to their conservation, including threats from human utilization and changing land use, are presented here.

Conclusions: The production of an online flora of all known plants and an assessment of the conservation status of all known plant species as far as possible, to guide conservation action are the first two targets of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation. Without knowing how many species there are and how they should be circumscribed, neither of these targets is achievable. Orchids are a fascinating subject for fundamental research with rapid species evolution, specific organ structure and development, but they also suffer from high levels of threat. Effective orchid conservation must take account of the beneficial interactions with fungi and pollinators and the potentially detrimental effects of over-collection and changes in land use.

Keywords: Conservation biology, fungi, mycorrhizas, Orchidaceae, orchids, pollination ecology, taxonomy


Orchids continue to be a high-profile group of plants from biological and conservation perspectives, and some groups, e.g. slipper orchids, are among the most endangered groups of organisms (Fay and Rankou, 2016; Fig. 1). Following a previous Highlight (Fay, Pailler and Dixon, 2015, and seven associated papers), many new papers have been published on orchids, their conservation and their interactions with other organisms including humans. In some of these interactions, the orchids are clearly dependent on the other organisms, e.g. mycorrhizal fungi and pollinators, but in one recent paper, the role of litter-trapping plants, including some orchids, in providing food and housing for commensal organisms was stressed (Zona and Christenhusz, 2015).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

A. Damage to the habitat of two Cypripedium species caused by road building in Yunnan, China: an example of the threats to orchids caused by changes in land use. B. One of the remaining plants of C. tibeticum at this site (Photos: Maarten Christenhusz)

A further seven papers relating to orchids are presented here. Of these, two relate mycorrhizal associations (Jacquemyn et al., 2016; Mujica et al., 2016), two relate to interactions, direct or indirect, with humans (Blambert et al., 2015; Vogt-Schilb et al., 2016) and two relate to pollination and reproduction (Hetherington-Rauth and Ramírez, 2016; Krawczyk et al., 2016).

The remaining paper (Pedersen, Srimuang and Watthana, 2016) does not deal directly with interactions with other organisms, instead focusing on the importance of establishing a robust system of classification in setting conservation strategy. Targets 1 and 2 of the current version of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation (Convention on Biological Diversity, 2011) relate directly to the importance of such a robust classification in directing conservation activities. Target 1 calls for the production of an online flora of all known plants and Target 2 calls for an assessment of the conservation status of all known plant species as far as possible, to guide conservation action. Without knowing how many species there are and how they should be circumscribed, neither of these targets is achievable. Orchids, as potentially the largest family of angiosperms (Chase et al., 2015), present a challenge in this respect, with >26000 species to catalogue, and the existence of species complexes and occurrence of hybridization in some groups of orchids further complicate the process. Here, Pedersen et al. (2016) use a combination of multivariate morphometric analysis and genetic fingerprinting to resolve a species complex in Geodorum, demonstrating that the apparently conservation-dependent G. pulchellum is not distinct from its commoner relative, G. siamense, and that it does not warrant conservation attention. In a recent phylogenetic study (Bone, Cribb and Buerki, 2015), Geodorum was shown to be embedded in Eulophia, and the genus may end up being subsumed as a result; however, the results presented here relate to the species level and are robust, regardless of any future decision to make Geodorum a synonym of Eulophia or to split Eulophia further.

Characteristics of habitats are important in determining distributions of plants in general and of orchids in particular, due to their often complex interactions with other organisms. For example, Damon et al. (2016) investigated orchid distributions in tropical mountain cloud forest ecosystems and demonstrated the importance of ravines as orchid-rich habitats. This was despite the instability of the steep slopes and landslips that are characteristic of these habitats, and the authors noted the importance of management of the surrounding areas in minimizing such risks. Here, Vogt-Schilb et al. (2016) investigate changes in orchid distributions on Corsica from surveys carried out 27 years apart at 45 sites on Corsica and the effect of land-use change (measured as change in woody plant cover). The study demonstrates stability at the regional (island) level, but high levels of turnover in species composition at the local level. The authors stress the importance of habitat mosaics for maintaining species diversity at large spatial scales. Blambert et al. (2016) investigate the effects of harvesting of two Jumellea species (used for their aromatic and medicinal properties) on reproductive patterns and genetic diversity, demonstrating that the rarer species is already affected by over-collection and fragmentation. The authors recommend ex situ cultivation as a way of meeting the needs of local people at the same time as preventing further impact on the wild populations.

Presence of suitable fungi has been implicated in orchid distributions (e.g. Rasmussen and Rasmussen, 2014; Rasmussen et al., 2015; Davis et al., 2015; Lee, Yang and Gebauer, 2015). Here, Jacquemyn et al. (2016) demonstrate differences in the mycorrhizal communities associated with recently diverged Epipactis species and draw attention to the need for further studies aimed at elucidating the role of habitat-specific adaptations and mycorrhizal divergence in the process of speciation in orchids. In the second paper related to this area of research, Mujica et al. (2016) characterize mycorrhizal communities associated with two Bipinnula species and examine the effect of soil nutrient availability on these communities.

Orchid reproduction and pollination continue to be active fields of research. The previous highlight included one paper on pollination of Sprecklinia species by Drosophila involving the production of aggregation pheromones by the orchids (Karremans et al., 2015) and one on evolution of reproductive isolation in Dendrobium species (Pinheiro et al., 2015). Other recent papers related to this general area have been published recently on pollination in non-rewarding Traunsteinera globosa (Jersáková et al., 2016) that mimics fly-pollinated rewarding species, pollinator rarity as a threat to an orchid with a specialized wasp pollination system (Phillips et al., 2015), the role of labellar secretions in attracting insect pollinators in Bulbophyllum (Stpiczyńska, Davies and Kamińska, 2015) and the long tongued hawkmoth pollinator niche in African plants with long floral tubes, including orchids (Johnson and Raguso, 2016). In this issue, Hetherington-Rauth and Ramírez (2016) investigate the role of floral scent in pollination of Gongora species by euglossine bees, demonstrating that floral scent chemotypes are correlated with distinct bee assemblies. Finally, Krawczyk et al. (2016) investigate modes of reproduction in the mycoheterotrophic Epipogium aphyllum, revealing that, despite the lack of prezygotic barriers, automatic self-pollination does not occur due to the position of the pollinia. In the absence of pollination, however, parthenogenesis can lead to the production of seed, a tactic that provides for continued seed production even when insect pollination fails.

The papers presented here demonstrate that research into orchids and their interactions with other organisms, including humans, is a vibrant field. We have still much to learn about these interactions, but it is clear that effective orchid conservation must take account of the beneficial interactions with fungi and pollinators and the potentially detrimental effects of over-collection and changes in land use.

LITERATURE CITED

  1. Blambert L, Mallet B, Humeau L, Pailler T. 2016. Reproductive patterns, genetic diversity and inbreeding depression in two closely related Jumellea species with contrasting patterns of commonness and distribution. Annals of Botany 118: 93–103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bone RE, Cribb PJ, Buerki S. 2015. Phylogenetics of Eulophiinae (Orchidaceae: Epidendroideae): evolutionary patterns and implications for generic delimitation. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 179: 43–56. [Google Scholar]
  3. Chase MW, Cameron KM, Freudenstein JV, Pridgeon AM, Salazar G, van den Berg C, Schuiteman A. 2015. An updated classification of Orchidaceae. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 177: 151–174. [Google Scholar]
  4. Conventional on Biological Diversity. 2011. Global Strategy for Plant Conservation. The targets 2011-2020. https://www.cbd.int/gspc/targets.shtml (last accessed 15 April 2016). [Google Scholar]
  5. Damon A, Almeida-Cerino C, Valle-Mora J, Bertolini V, López-Urbina J-H. 2015. Ravines as refuges for Orchidaceae in south-eastern Mexico. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 178: 283–297. [Google Scholar]
  6. Davis BJ, Phillips RD, Wright M, Linde CC, Dixon KW. 2015. Continent-wide distribution in mycorrhizal fungi: implications for the biogeography of specialized orchids. Annals of Botany 116: 413–421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fay MF, Pailler T, Dixon KW. 2015. Orchid conservation: making the links. Annals of Botany 116: 377-379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fay MF, Rankou H. 2016. Slipper orchids on the IUCN Red List. In: 2015 Annual Report to the Environment Agency - Abu Dhabi. Framework Support for Implementing the Strategic Plan of the IUCN Species Survival Commission, 106-111. http://cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads/2015_ead_report_final_web.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  9. Hetherington-Rauth MC, Ramírez SR. 2016. Evolution and diversity of floral scent chemistry in the euglossine bee-pollinated orchid genus Gongora. Annals of Botany 118: 135-148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Jacquemyn H, Waud M, Lievens B, Brys R. 2016. Differences in mycorrhizal communities between Epipactis palustris, E. helleborine and its presumed sister species E. neerlandica. Annals of Botany 118: 105-114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Jersáková J, Spaethe J, Streinzer M, Neumayer J, Paulus H, Dötterl S, Johnson SD. 2016. Does Traunsteinera globosa (the globe orchid) dupe its pollinators through generalized food deception or mimicry? Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 180: 269–294. [Google Scholar]
  12. Johnson SD, Raguso RA. 2016. The long-tongued hawkmoth pollinator niche for native and invasive plants in Africa. Annals of Botany 117: 25-36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Karremans AP, Pupulin F, Grimaldi D, Beentjes K, Butôt R, Fazzi GE, Kaspers K, Kruizinga J, Roessingh P, Smets E, Gravendeel B. 2015. Pollination of Specklinia by nectar feeding Drosophila: first reported case of a deceptive syndrome employing aggregation pheromones in Orchidaceae. Annals of Botany 116: 437-455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Krawczyk E, Rojek J, Kowalkowska AK, Kapusta M, Znaniecka J, Minasiewicz J. 2016. Sexual and asexual reproduction can act (together) in ghost orchid (Epipogium aphyllum Sw., Orchidaceae Juss.). Annals of Botany 118: 159-172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lee Y-I, Yang C-K, Gebauer G. 2015. The importance of associations with saprotrophic non-Rhizoctonia fungi among fully mycoheterotrophic orchids is currently under-estimated: novel evidence from sub-tropical Asia. Annals of Botany 116: 423–435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Mujica MI, Saez N, Cisternas M, Manzano M, Armesto JJ, Pérez F. 2016. Relationship between soil nutrients and mycorrhizal associations of two Bipinnula species (Orchidaceae) from central Chile. Annals of Botany 118: 149-158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Pedersen HÆ, Srimuang K-O, Watthana S. 2016. Strengthening the taxonomic backbone of Thai orchid conservation: genetic fingerprinting and morphometry applied to a species complex in Geodorum. Annals of Botany 118: 125-133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Pinheiro F, Cafasso D, Cozzolino S, Scopece G. 2015. Transitions between self-compatibility and self-incompatibility and the evolution of reproductive isolation in the large and diverse tropical genus Dendrobium (Orchidaceae). Annals of Botany 116: 457-467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Phillips RD, Peakall R, Retter BA, Montgomery K, Menz MHM, Davis BJ, Hayes C, Brown GR, Swarts ND, Dixon KW. 2015. Pollinator rarity as a threat to a plant with a specialized pollination system. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 179: 511–525. [Google Scholar]
  20. Rasmussen HN, Dixon KW, Jersáková J, Těšitelová T. 2015. Germination and seedling establishment in orchids: a complex of requirements. Annals of Botany 116: 391–402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Rasmussen HN, Rasmussen FN. 2014. Seedling mycorrhiza: a discussion of origin and evolution in Orchidaceae. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 175: 313–327. [Google Scholar]
  22. Stpiczyńska M, Davies KL, Kamińska M. 2015. Diverse labellar secretions in African Bulbophyllum (Orchidaceae: Bulbophyllinae) sections Ptiloglossum, Oreonastes and Megaclinium. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 179: 266–287. [Google Scholar]
  23. Vogt-Schilb H, Pradel R, Geniez P, Hugot L, Delage A, Richard F, Schatz B. 2016. Responses of orchids to habitat change in Corsica over 27 years. Annals of Botany 118: 115-123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Zona S, Christenhusz MJM. 2015. Litter-trapping plants: filter-feeders of the plant kingdom. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 179: 554–586. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of Botany are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES