Table 1.
Number of Trials Classified as Nonrandom as a Function of Participant, Foraging Method, and Condition.
| Finger foraging |
Gaze foraging |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Participant no. | Feature condition | Conjunction condition | Feature condition | Conjunction condition |
| 1 | 6 | 19 | 0 | 7 |
| 2 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 3 |
| 3 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 14 |
| 4 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 1 | 15 | 1 | 2 |
| 6 | 0 | 11 | 1 | 0 |
| 7 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 1 |
| 8 | 8 | 18 | 3 | 7 |
| 9 | 1 | 20 | 0 | 2 |
| 10 | 1 | 20 | 0 | 0 |
| 11 | 12 | 20 | 0 | 9 |
| 12 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 13 | 5 | 20 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | 4 | 13 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 7 | 20 | 0 | 2 |
| 16 | 6 | 20 | 0 | 2 |
| Average | 3.6 | 16.6 | 0.3 | 3.1 |
| SD | 3.4 | 5.2 | 0.8 | 4.0 |
Note. A trial is classified as nonrandom if it deviates significantly from the expected number of runs (assessed with a one-sample runs test). For example, many trials in the finger foraging conjunction condition are classified as nonrandom as participants typically use only two very long runs.