Skip to main content
Public Health Reports logoLink to Public Health Reports
. 2016 Jul-Aug;131(4):526–530. doi: 10.1177/0033354916662209

An Approach to Achieving the Health Equity Goals of the National HIV/AIDS Strategy for the United States Among Racial/Ethnic Minority Communities

Donna Hubbard McCree a,, Linda Beer a, Cynthia Prather a, Zanetta Gant a, Norma Harris a, Madeline Sutton a, Catlainn Sionean a, Erica Dunbar a, Jennifer Smith a, Pascale Wortley a
PMCID: PMC4937112  PMID: 27453595

Since the early 1980s, substantial progress has been made in the prevention and treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection in the United States. However, HIV remains a major public health concern due in part to significant disparities1 in rates of infection among racial/ethnic minority communities, with black/African American (hereinafter referred to as African American) and Hispanic/Latino populations being the most affected subgroups.2 African Americans comprised 44% of new HIV diagnoses in 2014, despite representing only 12% of the population; 23% of new HIV diagnoses were among Hispanics/Latinos, who represent about 16% of the U.S. population. Gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (MSM) are the most disproportionately affected subpopulations among African Americans and Hispanics/Latinos. In 2014, an estimated 78% of diagnosed HIV infections among African American males and 84% of diagnosed HIV infections among Hispanic/Latino males resulted from male-to-male sexual contact.2 The causes of these disparities are complex and interrelated and can be attributed to myriad individual, social, contextual, and environmental factors. Accordingly, prevention strategies to reduce disparities must be based on an integrated, targeted approach that addresses the individual, social, structural, and contextual environments in which disparities occur.3

The White House released the National HIV/AIDS Strategy (NHAS) for the United States in 2010 and updated it in July 2015. Both the 2010 and 2015 NHAS provide a plan for federal agencies to address HIV-related disparities by reducing mortality in communities at high risk for HIV, adopting community approaches to reduce new HIV infections, and reducing HIV-related stigma and discrimination. The updated NHAS lists action steps to reduce HIV-related disparities, including scaling up effective, evidence-based programs that address social determinants of health and promoting evidence-based public health approaches to HIV prevention and care.4,5

In 2012, a multidisciplinary workgroup was convened in the Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to review research on factors that contribute to disparities in rates of HIV infection among racial/ethnic groups and develop an approach for achieving the health equity goals of the updated NHAS in African American and Hispanic/Latino communities. In this article, we discuss the existing literature on factors that contribute to disparities in rates of HIV infection among racial/ethnic groups and present an approach for achieving the equity goals of the updated NHAS in African American and Hispanic/Latino communities. Practitioners, policy makers, intervention program managers, community-based organizations, and other partners in HIV prevention can use this approach to guide collective actions and monitor progress toward health equity in these communities.

FACTORS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO DISPARITIES IN HIV RATES

Individual risk behaviors (e.g., having multiple partners, not using condoms) alone do not account for disparities in rates of HIV infection among racial/ethnic groups.68 These disparities are associated with differences in the social and structural environments in which risk behaviors occur.9,10 For example, some African American and Hispanic/Latino communities experience high rates of sexually transmitted infections (STIs),11 poverty,1214 and incarceration,1519 as well as low levels of socioeconomic status and education.8,1214 The patterns of assortative sexual-partner selection (i.e., selecting sexual partners who are of the same race/ethnicity)6,20 in these communities, coupled with the higher background prevalence of HIV infection and other STIs, may create sexual networks that facilitate HIV transmission among these racial/ethnic populations.14,2123 High rates of poverty and low levels of education can affect access to high-quality health care and HIV prevention and care services.24 High incarceration rates may disrupt social and sexual networks, leading to more risky behaviors and fragmented care for individuals who are in and out of the penal system.1519 Additionally, Hispanics/Latinos face obstacles to care because of immigration status and language barriers.14

HIV is one of the most stigmatizing illnesses in the United States. Stigma and related attitudes within and about racial/ethnic minority communities are typically disparaging of HIV.2527 Such attitudes may lead HIV-positive people in these communities to be less likely to disclose their HIV status and to feel less connected to social support systems.25,26 HIV-positive members of racial/ethnic minority communities may experience the combined negative effects of HIV stigma, racism, and racial discrimination, which are associated with increased psychological distress and sexual risk behavior among people living with HIV infection. These factors may impede efforts to stop the spread of HIV and may further increase disparities among African American and Hispanic/Latino populations.2527

Differences in antiretroviral therapy (ART) use by race/ethnicity are documented frequently in the scientific literature, with results showing that use of ART is lower for African Americans than for non-Hispanic white people and Hispanics/Latinos.2830 African Americans and Hispanics/Latinos are also less likely to be aware of their HIV status and less likely to be retained in care than non-Hispanic white people.31,32 These differences may explain the lower rates of viral suppression among African Americans and Hispanics/Latinos compared with non-Hispanic white people. Lower rates of viral suppression in racial/ethnic minority communities may produce sexual networks in which HIV transmission is more likely.

African American and Hispanic/Latino MSM experience additional challenges. African American and Hispanic/Latino MSM do not engage in more risky behaviors (i.e., having multiple partners, not using condoms) than MSM of other racial/ethnic groups.30,3337 The higher background prevalence of HIV30,33,34,37 and assortative partner selection practices33,36,37 in these communities, along with stigma3336,38,39 and homonegative attitudes,3336,3840 place African American and Latino MSM at higher risk for HIV infection than MSM of other racial/ethnic groups. Compared with MSM of other racial/ethnic groups, African American MSM are also less likely to be aware of their HIV status, and those who are aware of their status have lower rates of linkage to care, retention in care, and viral suppression.40

AN APPROACH TO ADDRESS THE PROBLEM

Given the factors associated with HIV-related disparities among African Americans and Hispanics/Latinos, prevention approaches must be informed by an integrated and targeted approach that addresses the individual, social, structural, and contextual environments in which these disparities occur.4 The workgroup offers the following approaches to address inequities in rates of HIV among African American and Hispanic/Latino communities.

Cross-agency collaboration among federal agencies that addresses factors associated with HIV-related health disparities

Collaboration among federal agencies to address the economic, educational, and justice-related (i.e., incarceration) factors associated with HIV-related disparities may be a primary resource for achieving health equity. These collaborations could identify effective methods for improving educational attainment; decreasing incarceration rates; and mitigating the effects of poverty, unstable housing, and employment status on access to, and engagement in, high-quality HIV care and prevention services.

Increase awareness of HIV status among African Americans and Hispanics/Latinos living with HIV

Increasing awareness of HIV status, especially among African American and Hispanic/Latino MSM, through HIV testing is essential for reducing the risk of transmission and for addressing disparities. Individuals who were HIV infected but unaware of their status accounted for 30% of HIV transmissions in 2009.41 CDC recommends that all people aged 13–64 years be tested for HIV at least once in their lifetime.42 Individuals at high risk for HIV should be tested at least annually. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force also recommends that clinicians routinely screen people aged 15–65 years for HIV.43 Despite these recommendations, an estimated one in eight Americans living with HIV infection is unaware of their HIV status.44 Effective strategies for increasing awareness of HIV status include supporting routine HIV testing in clinical settings with new testing technologies45 (e.g., emergency departments that see a large number of racial/ethnic minority individuals), expanding HIV testing initiatives in nonclinical settings, facilitating and promoting the use of HIV antigen-antibody combination assays to identify acute infections,45 strengthening partner services, and facilitating linkage to and reengagement in care. Implementing this approach will facilitate early diagnosis of HIV infection and allow infected people to obtain treatment that can improve the quality and length of their lives, lead to reductions in high-risk behaviors, and reduce the likelihood of HIV transmission.45,46 Expanding testing initiatives in nonclinical settings has the potential to reach more racial/ethnic minority individuals and decrease disparities in awareness of HIV status.

Identify and implement methods to improve viral suppression among African Americans and Hispanics/Latinos living with HIV

Access and adherence to ART are essential for viral suppression, which reduces morbidity and the likelihood of HIV transmission. Identifying evidence-based interventions that are effective in promoting linkage to, retention in, and reengagement in care and increasing the use of ART among racial/ethnic minority communities, particularly interventions tailored to MSM, are necessary to increase viral suppression among people living with HIV.28,44 Mistrust of the medical establishment may be a barrier to accessing HIV care and treatment services, especially among African Americans.28 Consequently, training for health-care providers could focus on providing services for racially and ethnically diverse patient populations and on teaching techniques for promoting trust in patient–provider relationships. Additionally, training providers on effective methods for delivering treatment and prevention services to racial/ethnic, sexual, and gender minority groups is crucial for addressing HIV-related disparities in these subpopulations.

Promote community-level risk-reduction approaches

The most efficacious community-level strategies to reduce disparities address the social and structural conditions that may facilitate HIV transmission and impede care and treatment.10,47 Strategies that have demonstrated efficacy in reducing transmission in racial/ethnic minority communities and MSM include condom distribution programs,48 behavioral interventions,49 anti-stigma campaigns,49 provision of ART,49 preexposure prophylaxis,50 and nonoccupational postexposure prophylaxis for individuals at risk for HIV, specifically serodiscordant couples.51,52

Encourage additional research to address gaps in knowledge to inform strategies

Information is lacking on the pathways through which the social, economic, and structural factors described in this article affect HIV-related health disparities among African Americans and Hispanics/Latinos. Buot and colleagues proposed a model that specifies likely ways that social inequality, income inequality, and poverty contribute to racial/ethnic disparities in HIV incidence.9 More research is needed to identify the causal pathways through which the factors discussed in this article contribute to racial/ethnic disparities and to test these hypotheses to determine where best to intervene to have the maximum effect.

Estimate and monitor measurable outcomes and impact

A major challenge to monitoring outcomes is the limited availability and use of uniform definitions for health equity across agencies and in the scientific literature. Measures are needed to assess improvements in the socioeconomic factors associated with HIV-related health disparities and how these improvements are linked to reductions in risk behavior and transmission and improvements in care and treatment.

CONCLUSION AND NEXT STEPS

More than three decades after recognition of the first case of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, and despite the discovery and implementation of effective treatment and prevention efforts, disparities in HIV infection remain. Although current prevention efforts and the advent of ART in recent years have helped to stabilize the number of new infections, continued growth in the number of HIV-infected people who are undiagnosed and those who are diagnosed but not in care will ultimately lead to more new infections if prevention, care, and treatment efforts are not intensified. Although challenging to implement, social and structural interventions delivered at the community level hold the greatest promise for optimal synergy with behavioral and biomedical strategies, and for reaching health equity goals. In addition to ongoing federal collaborations, public–private partnerships, community mobilization, and greater community engagement may be required to support health equity efforts.

Footnotes

The findings and conclusions in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Braveman P. What are health disparities and health equity? We need to be clear. Public Health Rep. 2014;129(Suppl 2):5–8. doi: 10.1177/00333549141291S203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US) Diagnoses of HIV infection in the United States and dependent areas, 2014. HIV Surveill Rep. 2015;26:1–123. Also available from: http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/library/reports/surveillance [cited 2016 Apr 27] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Brown D, McCree DH, Eke A. African Americans and HIV: epidemiology, context, behavioral interventions, and future directions for prevention. In: Hall JC, Hall BJ, Cockerell CJ, editors. HIV/AIDS in the post-HAART era: manifestations, treatment, and epidemiology. Shelton (CT): People's Medical Publishing House; 2011. pp. 656–78. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.White House (US), Office of National AIDS Policy. National HIV/AIDS strategy for the United States [cited 2016 Apr 27] Available from: http://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/eop/onap/nhas.
  • 5.White House (US), Office of National AIDS Policy. National HIV/AIDS strategy for the United States: updated to 2020 [cited 2016 Apr 27] Available from: https://www.aids.gov/federal-resources/national-hiv-aids-strategy/nhas-update.pdf.
  • 6.Mosher WD, Chandra A, Jones J. Sexual behavior and selected health measures: men and women 15–44 years of age, United States, 2002. Adv Data. 2005;362:1–56. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hallfors DD, Iritani BJ, Miller WC, Bauer DJ. Sexual and drug behavior patterns and HIV and STD racial disparities: the need for new directions. Am J Public Health. 2007;97:125–32. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.075747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Tillerson K. Explaining racial disparities in HIV/AIDS incidence among women in the U.S.: a systematic review. Stat Med. 2008;27:4132–43. doi: 10.1002/sim.3224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Buot ML, Docena JP, Ratemo BK, Bittner MJ, Burlew JT, Nuritdinov AR, et al. Beyond race and place: distal sociological determinants of HIV disparities. PLoS One. 2014;9:e91711. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Adimora AA, Auerbach JD. Structural interventions for HIV prevention in the United States. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010;55(Suppl 2):S132–5. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181fbcb38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US), Division of STD Prevention. Atlanta: CDC; 2013. Sexually transmitted disease surveillance 2012. Also available from: http://www.cdc.gov/std/stats12/surv2012.pdf [cited 2014 Oct 8] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Denning PH, DiNenno EA, Wiegand RE. Characteristics associated with HIV infection among heterosexuals in urban areas with high AIDS prevalence—24 cities, United States, 2006–2007. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011;60(31):1045–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Aidala A, Cross JE, Stall R, Harre D, Sumartojo E. Housing status and HIV risk behaviors: implications for prevention and policy. AIDS Behav. 2005;9:251–65. doi: 10.1007/s10461-005-9000-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bowleg L, Raj A. Shared communities, structural contexts, and HIV risk: prioritizing the HIV risk and prevention needs of black heterosexual men. Am J Public Health. 2012;102(Suppl 2):S173–7. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Widner L, Noar SM, Golin CE, Willoughby JF, Crosby R. Incarceration and unstable housing interact to predict sexual risk behaviors among African American STD clinic patients. Int J STD AIDS. 2013;25:348–54. doi: 10.1177/0956462413505999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Adimora AA, Schoenbach VJ, Martinson FE, Coyne-Beasley T, Doherty I, Stancil TR, et al. Heterosexually transmitted HIV infection among African Americans in North Carolina. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2006;41:616–23. doi: 10.1097/01.qai.0000191382.62070.a5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Knittel AK, Snow RC, Griffith DM, Morenoff J. Incarceration and sexual risk: examining the relationship between men's involvement in the criminal justice system and risky sexual behavior. AIDS Behav. 2013;17:2703–14. doi: 10.1007/s10461-013-0421-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Thomas JC, Torren E. Incarceration as forced migration: effects on selected community health outcomes. Am J Public Health. 2006;96:1762–5. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.081760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Khan MR, Doherty IA, Schoenbach JV, Taylor EM, Epperson MW, Adimora AA. Incarceration and high-risk sex partnerships among men in the United States. J Urban Health. 2009;86:584–601. doi: 10.1007/s11524-009-9348-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sprecher S, Sullivan Q, Hatfield E. Mate selection preferences: gender differences examined in a national sample. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994;66:1074–80. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.66.6.1074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Neblett RC, Davey-Rothwell M, Chander G, Latkin CA. Social network characteristics and HIV sexual risk behavior among urban African American women. J Urban Health. 2011;88:54–65. doi: 10.1007/s11524-010-9513-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Friedman SR, Cooper HL, Osborne AH. Structural and social contexts of HIV risk among African Americans [published erratum appears in Am J Public Health 2009;99:1352] Am J Public Health. 2009;99:1002–8. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.140327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Das M, Chu PL, Santos GM, Scheer S, Vittinghoff E, McFarland W, et al. Decreases in community viral load are accompanied by reductions in new HIV infections in San Francisco. PloS One. 2010;5:e11068. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hogben M, Leichliter JS. Social determinants and sexually transmitted disease disparities. Sex Transm Dis. 2008;35(12 Suppl):S13–8. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e31818d3cad. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Choi KH, Han CS, Paul J, Ayala G. Strategies of managing racism and homophobia among U.S. ethnic and racial minority men who have sex with men. AIDS Educ Prev. 2011;23:145–58. doi: 10.1521/aeap.2011.23.2.145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Rao D, Pryor JB, Gaddist BW, Mayer R. Stigma, secrecy, and discrimination: ethnic/racial differences in the concerns of people living with HIV/AIDS. AIDS Behav. 2008;12:265–61. doi: 10.1007/s10461-007-9268-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Radcliffe J, Doty N, Hawkins LA, Gaskins CS, Beidas R, Rudy BJ. Stigma and sexual health risk in HIV-positive African American young men who have sex with men. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2010;24:493–9. doi: 10.1089/apc.2010.0020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Beer L, Heffelfinger J, Frazier E, Mattson C, Roter B, Barash E, et al. Use of and adherence to antiretroviral therapy in a large U.S. sample of HIV-infected adults in care, 2007–2008. Open AIDS J. 2012;6:213–23. doi: 10.2174/1874613601206010213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Fleishman JA, Yehia BR, Moore RD, Gebo KA, Agwu AL HIV Research Network. Disparities in receipt of antiretroviral therapy among HIV-infected adults (2002–2008) Med Care. 2012;50:419–27. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31824e3356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Oster AM, Wiegand RE, Sionean C, Miles IJ, Thomas PE, Melendez-Morales L, et al. Understanding disparities in HIV infection between black and white MSM in the United States. AIDS. 2011;25:1103–12. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e3283471efa. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Mermin J, Fenton KA. The future of HIV prevention in the United States. JAMA. 2012;308:347–8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.8693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Bradley H, Hall HI, Wolitski RJ, Van Handel MV, Stone AE, LaFlam M, et al. Vital signs: HIV diagnosis, care, and treatment among persons living with HIV—United States, 2011. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2014;63(47):1113–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Millett GA, Peterson JL, Wolitski RJ, Stall R. Greater risk for HIV infection of black men who have sex with men: a critical literature review. Am J Public Health. 2006;96:1007–19. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.066720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Millett GA, Flores SA, Peterson JL, Bakeman R. Explaining -disparities in HIV infection among black and white men who have sex with men: a meta-analysis of HIV risk behaviors. AIDS. 2007;21:2083–91. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e3282e9a64b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Flores SA, Bakeman R, Millett GA, Peterson JL. HIV risk among bisexually and homosexually active racially diverse young men. Sex Transm Dis. 2009;36:325–9. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3181924201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Harawa NT, Greenland S, Bingham TA, Johnson DF, Cochran SD, Cunningham WE, et al. Associations of race/ethnicity with HIV prevalence and HIV-related behaviors among young men who have sex with men in 7 urban centers in the United States. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2004;35:526–36. doi: 10.1097/00126334-200404150-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Feldman MB. A critical literature review to identify possible causes of higher rates of HIV infection among young black and Latino men who have sex with men. J Natl Med Assoc. 2010;102:1206–21. doi: 10.1016/s0027-9684(15)30776-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Jeffries WL, 4th, Marks G, Lauby J, Murrill CS, Millett GA. Homophobia is associated with sexual behavior that increases risk of acquiring and transmitting HIV infection among black men who have sex with men. AIDS Behav. 2013;17:1442–53. doi: 10.1007/s10461-012-0189-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Jeffries WL, 4th, Johnson OD. Homonegative attitudes and risk behaviors for HIV and other sexually transmitted infections among sexually active men in the United States. Am J Public Health. 2015;105:2466–72. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Rosenberg ES, Millett GA, Sullivan PS, del Rio C, Curran JW. Understanding the HIV disparities between black and white men who have sex with men in the USA using the HIV care continuum: a modeling study. Lancet HIV. 2014;1:e112–8. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(14)00011-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Skarbinski J, Rosenberg E, Paz-Bailey G, Hall HI, Rose CE, Viall AH, et al. Human immunodeficiency virus transmission at each step of the care continuum in the United States. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175:588–96. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.8180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Branson BM, Handsfield HH, Lampe MA, Janssen RS, Taylor AW, Lyss SB, et al. Revised recommendations for HIV testing of adults, adolescents, and pregnant women in health-care settings. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2006;55(RR-14):1–17. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Moyer VA U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for HIV: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2013;159:51–60. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-159-1-201307020-00645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Hall HI, Ann Q, Tang T, Song R, Chen M, Green T, et al. Prevalence of diagnosed and undiagnosed HIV infection—United States, 2008–2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015;64(24):657–62. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Branson BM. HIV testing updates and challenges: when regulatory caution and public health imperatives collide. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2015;12:117–26. doi: 10.1007/s11904-014-0251-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Marks G, Crepaz N, Senterfitt JW, Janssen RS. Meta-analysis of high-risk sexual behavior in persons aware and unaware they are infected with HIV in the United States: implications for HIV prevention programs. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2005;39:446–53. doi: 10.1097/01.qai.0000151079.33935.79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Higa D, Crepaz N, Lyles C for the Prevention Research Synthesis Team. Identification of evidence-based interventions for promotion, linkage to, retention, and re-engagement in HIV medical care: findings from a systematic review of randomized controlled trials, 1996–2012. Presentation at IAPAC 9th International Conference on HIV Treatment and Prevention Adherence; 2014 Jun 8–10; Miami. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Charania MR, Crepaz N, Guenther-Gray C, Henny K, Liau A, Willis LA, et al. Efficacy of structural-level condom distribution interventions: a meta-analysis of U.S. and international studies, 1998–2007. AIDS Behav. 2011;15:1283–97. doi: 10.1007/s10461-010-9812-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Lyles CM, Kay LS, Crepaz N, Herbst JH, Passin WF, Kim AS, et al. Best evidence interventions: findings from a systematic review of HIV behavioral interventions for US populations at high risk, 2000–2004. Am J Public Health. 2007;97:133–43. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.076182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Grant RM, Lama JR, Anderson PL, McMahan V, Liu AY, Vargas L, et al. Preexposure chemoprophylaxis for HIV prevention in men who have sex with men. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:2587–99. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1011205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Baeten JM, Donnell D, Ndase P, Mugo NR, Campbell JD, Wangisi J, et al. Antiretroviral prophylaxis for HIV prevention in heterosexual men and women. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:399–410. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1108524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Thigpen MC, Kebaabetswe PM, Paxton LA, Smith DK, Rose CE, Segolodi TM, et al. Antiretroviral preexposure prophylaxis for heterosexual HIV transmission in Botswana. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:423–34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1110711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Public Health Reports are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES