Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2016 Jul 8;6:28983. doi: 10.1038/srep28983

Methotrexate Nanoparticles Prepared with Codendrimer from Polyamidoamine (PAMAM) and Oligoethylene Glycols (OEG) Dendrons: Antitumor Efficacy in Vitro and in Vivo

Yanna Zhao 1, Yifei Guo 1,a, Ran Li 2, Ting Wang 2, Meihua Han 1, Chunyan Zhu 1, Xiangtao Wang 1,b
PMCID: PMC4937365  PMID: 27388443

Abstract

The novel methotrexate-loaded nanoparticles (MTX/PGD NPs) prepared with amphiphilic codendrimer PGD from polyamidoamine and oligothylene glycol dendrons were obtained via antisolvent precipitation method augmented by ultrasonication. Based on the excellent hydrophility of PGD, the drug-loaded nanoparticles could be investigated easily with the high drug-loading content (~85.2%, w/w). The MTX/PGD NPs possessed spherical morphology, nanoscaled particle size (approximately 182.4 nm), and narrow particle size distribution. Release of MTX from MTX/PGD NPs showed a sustained release manner and completed within 48 h. Hemolytic evaluation indicated MTX/PGD NPs presented good blood compatibility, and the cytotoxicity of nanoparticles against breast cancer cells in vitro, biodistribution in tumor tissue, and antitumor efficacy in vivo were enhanced significantly compared to MTX injection. According to the higher drug-loading content, enhanced antitumor efficacy, and appropriate particle size, MTX/PGD NPs as the drug delivery systems could have potential application for cancer chemotherapy in clinic.

Chemotherapy is commonly preferred for human malignancies, as surgery and radiation therapy may not be fully effective at advanced stages of cancer1. Methotrexate (MTX) has played an instrumental role in the treatment of various cancers2,3,4,5,6,7,8. However, the application of MTX is seriously limited due to its poor solubility, toxic side effects, and nonspecific drug delivery9. In order to improve the therapeutic efficacy and reduce the side effects, various nanoscaled drug delivery systems (NDDS) such as microemulsions10, liposomes11, nano-conjugates12, nanoparticles13, nanocapsules14, and polymeric micelles15, have been developed. Nanoparticles (NPs) are one of the typical drug delivery systems with an average particle size of nanometer range, which could improve the solubility of hydrophobic drugs, stabilize and protect drugs from degradation, facilitate targeted drug delivery, enhance accumulation in the tumor site via the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect, prolong circulation time by avoiding the rapid renal clearance and reticuloendothelial systems (RES)16.

Based on these advantages, much research was focused on the preparation of MTX-loaded nanoparticles from linear or star amphiphilic copolymers via physical entrapment or chemical conjugation17,18,19,20,21. Majid Afshari et al. prepared MTX-loaded PLGA and PLGA-PEG nanoparticles as spherical shaped particles with a particle size of approximately 200 nm, the cytotoxicity effect was enhanced significantly19. Luo et al. developed a MTX-loaded PEG-chitosan nanoparticles system that showed enhanced cytotoxicity both in vitro and in vivo22. Wang et al. prepared core-shell nanoparticles from conjugated pullulan with MTX, these nanoparticles exhibited significant inhibitory effect on the cell proliferation23. Baker et al. researched the polyvalent dendrimer-MTX conjugate, which inhibited dihydrofolate reductase and induced cytotoxicity in KB cells24.

In our previous study, the amphiphilic codendrimer PGD from polyamidoamine (PAMAM) and oligoethylene glycols (OEG) dendrons was synthesized and utilized to prepare drug-loaded micelles (Fig. 1)25,26. Due to the highly branched structure, good biocompatibility, and environmental stimuli, PGD was considered to be potential feasible to be used as the drug carrier. Although these researches enhanced the solubility, promoted or maintained the cytotoxicity, the drug-loaded content (DLC) was unsatisfied (<40%), which may induce the side effect and limit its application.

Figure 1. Structure of the codendrimer PGD and MTX/PGD NPs.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Here, we report a novel strategy of preparation MTX nanoparticles (MTX/PGD NPs) based on amphiphilic codendrimer PGD via the antisolvent precipitation method augmented by ultrasonication (Fig. 1), and the DLC of MTX/PGD NPs was improved to 85.2% (w/w). Furthermore, the physiochemical properties of nanoparticles including the particle size, morphology, stability, release profiles, and antitumor efficacy both in vitro and in vivo were evaluated, which showed the MTX/PGD nanoparticles could be utilized as a potential drug delivery vehicle for breast cancer therapy.

Results and Discussion

Preparation of MTX/PGD NPs

In our previous studies, the drug-loaded micelles were prepared from amphiphilic codendrimers and anticancer drugs via classic dialysis method. Here, the MTX-loaded PGD nanoparticles (MTX/PGD NPs) were prepared via the revised antisolvent precipitation method augmented by ultrasonication, the resultant nanoparticles were dispersed in deionized water with slight yellow color (Fig. 2a), and the DLC was approximately 85.2%.

Figure 2. DLS curves of MTX/PGD NPs in aqueous solutions (a) and TEM images (b).

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Scale bar: 200 nm.

Particle Size, Zeta Potential, and Morphology of Nanoparticles

The particle size and zeta potential of MTX/PGD NPs in aqueous solution were measured by dynamic light scattering (DLS). The nanoparticles had a mean diameter of approximately 182.4 ± 7.5 nm and a very narrow size distribution (PDI = 0.11 ± 0.01). The particle size distribution curve is shown in Fig. 2a. The appropriate particle size (<200 nm) of MTX-loaded nanoparticles benefited to avoid reticuloendothelial system uptake and achieve passive tumor targeting through EPR effect27,28. The surface charge of this nanoparticles was approximately 15.9 ± 0.2 mV, while the surface charge of the MTX bulk powder suspensions (MTX suspension) was about −29.3 ± 1.2 mV. The reversal surface charge of the nanoparticles could be attributed to the codendrimer PGD, which presented positive charge and distributed on the surface of the nanoparticles.

Morphology of MTX/PGD NPs was investigated by TEM observation, the nanoparticles were well dispersed as individual particles with the regularly spherical shape, and the mean diameter was approximately 40 nm (Fig. 2b). The variation in particle size measured by TEM and particle-size analyzer was attributed to the fact that dynamic light scattering (DLS) measurement of the particle size analyzer gave the hydrodynamic diameter rather than the actual diameter of the dried particles29. To compare the morphology of MTX/PGD NPs with MTX bulk powder, they were detected by SEM further. SEM micrograph revealed that MTX/PGD NPs were spherical shape with approximately 50 nm in size (Fig. 3b); however, MTX bulk powder presented irregular shapes with the larger size (>1 μm, Fig. 3a), composed mostly of fragmented drug crystals. These results suggested the crystalline structure of MTX was lost during the preparation of the MTX/PGD NPs.

Figure 3. SEM images of MTX bulk powder (a) and MTX/PGD NPs (b).

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Measurement of the Fixed Aqueous Layer Thickness

The fixed aqueous layer thickness (FALT) of MTX/PGD NPs was determined by the method introduced by Sadzuka and Shi30,31, which was 10.3 nm (Supplementary Information, Table S1). The FALT of MTX/PGD NPs was almost 10 times thicker than that of MTX suspension (approximately 1.0 nm), the result suggested that codendrimer PGD was distributed on the surface of these nanoparticles and branched OEG chains might form ‘brush’ structures due to the strong steric hindrance32. A higher FALT could possibly provide a shift of the hydrodynamic phase of shear to greater distances from the particle surface, afford steric hindrance and prevent the particles to form aggregation and/or agglomeration, hence increase the stability of the nanoparticles2. Accordingly, the circulation time of the nanoparticles in blood was likely to increase, and prevent the attraction of opsonins to the nanoparticles33.

Surface Element Analysis

EDS analysis was employed to determine the composition and content on the surface of MTX bulk powder and MTX/PGD NPs (Supplementary Information, Figure S1). The amount of O element in MTX/PGD NPs was significantly increased compared with MTX bulk powder; meanwhile, the amount of N element in MTX/PGD NPs was 3-fold lower than MTX bulk powder. From these results, it seemed that the amphiphilic codendrimer PGD was mostly distributed on the surface of MTX/PGD NPs, due to the outside OEG dendron of PGD showed higher oxygen content, the lower N element could be attributed to the PAMAM core in PGD. The exposed OEG dendron chains, the same as poly(ethylene glycol) chains, could suppress the interaction between the nanoparticles and plasma proteins, decrease their immunogenicity and prolong their circulation time in the blood34.

Measurement of Stability

For the storage stability study, MTX/PGD NPs were stored at 4 °C, 25 °C, and 37 °C, respectively. The particle sizes of these samples were monitored over 14 days by DLS without further ultrasonication (Supplementary Information, Figure S2). After 14 days, the particle sizes of MTX/PGD NPs were approximately 193.8 ± 7.8, 194.5 ± 8.9, and 194.7 ± 3.7 nm for 4 °C, 25 °C and 37 °C respectively, no significant difference (P > 0.05) was obtained when compared to the value at day 0 (p = 0.3, 0.3, and 0.2 for 4 °C, 25 °C, and 37 °C relatively).

The stability in vivo is more important in clinical application, thus the stability of MTX/PGD NPs in plasma at 37 °C was studied. The mean diameter of MTX/PGD NPs was increased from 75.6 ± 6.5 to 90.1 ± 3.8 nm throughout the stability test (Supplementary Information, Figure S2). Although the average particle size was increased slightly, no significant difference was obtained compared to day 0 (p > 0.05), indicating the high stability in vivo.

For the lyophilization stability study, MTX/PGD NPs were lyophilized directly without any protector and reconstituted with water. After reconstitution, MTX/PGD NPs presented the regularly spherical shape with the mean diameter of approximately 181.1 ± 9.3 nm and a narrow size distribution (PDI = 0.15 ± 0.02), the zeta potential of the reconstituted nanoparticles was 14.1 ± 0.8 mV, all of these showed no significant changes compared with MTX/PGD NPs before lyophilization (Supplementary Information, Figure S3), which could be explained by the peripheral hydrophilic OEG dendron hindered the aggregation of particles.

All the results suggested that the MTX/PGD NPs showed the enhanced stability due to the branched OEG section, the similar phenomenon had been reported broadly that PEGlation can promote the stability of nanoparticles32,35. Based on the good stability, MTX/PGD NPs could be researched in vivo further.

Differential Scanning Calorimetry and X-ray Diffraction Analysis

To confirm the existing state of MTX in the nanoparticles, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) was utilized to elucidate the thermal transitions of MTX in bulk, in a physical mixtures and within MTX/PGD NPs analyses (Supplementary Information, Figure S4). The spectrum of MTX showed a sharp endothermic peak at 148 °C, which was associated with the melting of MTX according to the reports before36. Thermograms of PGD exhibited no endotherm during the whole heating procedure. The melting endothermic peak of MTX could be detected in the physical mixtures of MTX and PGD, however disappeared in MTX/PGD NPs.

X-ray powder diffraction was also used to confirm the state of MTX in drug-loaded nanoparticles. Free MTX bulk powder, physical mixture, and MTX/PGD NPs were measured (Supplementary Information, Figure S4). The intense peaks indicative MTX existed as the crystalline compound, which could be observed from the spectra of MTX bulk powder and physical mixture of MTX and PGD. While, in the MTX/PGD NPs, the characteristic diffraction peaks of MTX powder disappeared, which was in good agreement with the result from DSC.

Both the results from DSC and XRD analyses verified the state of MTX in MTX/PGD NPs was not physical mixed simply and suggested MTX was existed as either molecular dispersion or amorphous in MTX/PGD NPs, the interactions between MTX and PGD caused these changes37,38. These results were in accordance with the results of SEM and EDS.

In Vitro Studies on Release Kinetics

The in vitro drug release behavior of MTX/PGD NPs was evaluated in the 150 mM NaCl at 37 °C. A control experiment using free MTX was also carried out under similar conditions, and the results are shown in Fig. 4. For free MTX, complete diffusion across the dialysis membrane was found to occur within 4 h. Contrarily, the MTX/PGD NPs was sustained release for 48 h and the release procedure was fitted to a two-stage exponential kinetic model, with initial burst release followed by a slow separately release. Approximately 40% MTX was released from the nanoparticles within the initial 2 h, and then 60% MTX was released slowly during the following 46 h. Verified by EDS, DSC and XRD, the plausible explanation was the OEG dendrons might incorporate in the outer layer of MTX/PGD NPs, with the branched OEG segments extending outwards and forming a hydrophilic “shell” around the hydrophobic drug nanoparticles, which suggested that the amphiphilic codendrimer PGD could retain the MTX in the core of nanoparticles.

Figure 4. Cumulative MTX release from MTX solution and MTX/PGD NPs in 150 mM NaCl solution at 37 °C within 48 h (n = 3).

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Cytotoxicity Assay

The hemolytic activity of MTX/PGD NPs on rat RBC was researched to study its suitability for intravenous administration (Supplementary Information, Figure S5). After incubation with the 2% (w/v) RBC suspension at 37 °C for 5 h, the hemolysis rates of MTX/PGD NPs were below 2% in concentration ranging from 0.01 to 1 mg/mL (MTX equivalent concentration), suggesting no RBC membrane related toxicity.

To investigate in vitro antitumor efficacy of MTX/PGD NPs, the viability of two different cancer cell lines including MCF-7 cells and 4T1 cells were measured with an MTT assay, the concentration of MTX in both formulations ranged from 0.01 to 500 μg/mL. As shown in Fig. 5, amphiphilic codendrimer PGD showed no significant cytotoxicity against MCF-7 cells and 4T1 cells (inhibition <10%). On the contrary, MTX/PGD NPs inhibited the growth of MCF-7 cells and 4T1 cells in a dose-dependent manner after incubated for 48 h. MTX/PGD NPs exhibited enhanced cytotoxicity against MCF-7 cells, the half inhibition to cell growth (IC50) of the nanoparticles was detected as 8.9 μg/mL and 7.5-fold lower than MTX injection with the IC50 of 66.6 μg/mL (Fig. 5a). The cytotoxicity of MTX/PGD NPs against 4T1 cells were studied then, and the similar results were obtained as those from MCF-7 cells. MTX/PGD NPs exhibited a higher cytotoxicity compared to free MTX, the IC50 values for nanoparticles and free MTX were 3.8, 29.9 μg/mL (Fig. 5b), inhibition efficacy enhanced by 8-fold. It was generally considered that free drug was only transported into cells by passive diffusion while the nanoparticles could be nonspecifically internalized into cells via endocytosis, phagocytosis or pinocytosis after accumulating on the surface of the cells39. Besides, it was reported that the nanoparticles with positive charged could present better association and internalization rates due to the electrostatic interaction between the particles and the negatively charged cell membrane39,40. Hence, MTX/PGD NPs were potent to be much more effective in enhancing the in vitro inhibition effect in comparison with free MTX.

Figure 5. Cytotoxicities of MTX/PGD NPs towards MCF-7 cells (a) and 4T1 cells (b) after incubation for 48 h (n = 5).

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Cellular Uptake

Cellular uptake of MTX/PGD NPs and MTX injection was characterized in 4T1 cell line using fluorescent microcopy imaging system. To qualitatively investigate the cellular uptake of the MTX/PGD NPs, 4T1 cells were incubated with the cy5.5-labeled agents (cy5.5 was mixed with MTX injection or encapsulated in MTX/PGD NPs) at the equivalent cy5.5 concentration for 4 h. The MTX injection showed weak fluorescence signals in 4T1 cells, on the contrary, MTX/PGD NPs exhibited greater fluorescence signals (Fig. 6). Calculated from the fluorescence intensity (185.2 ± 7.4 vs. 1018.5 ± 8.1, MTX injection vs. nanoparticles), the uptake efficacy of nanoparticles was enhanced approximately 5.5-fold (p < 0.001), indicating that the MTX/PGD NPs were taken up better by 4T1 cells. It was possible that nanoparticles with a diameter of approximately 180 nm could be preferentially internalized via endocytosis pathway, while free MTX was transported into cells by passive diffusion.

Figure 6. Representative fluorescent microcopy images of 4T1 cells incubated with MTX injection and MTX/PGD NPs for 4 h.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Red: cy5.5, scale bar: 20 μm.

In Vivo Antitumor Efficacy

Motivated by the high in vitro anticancer effect and cell uptake efficacy, the in vivo antitumor activitites of MTX/PGD NPs were further investigated by using BALB/c mice bearing 4T1 breast tumor model via intravenous administration, while the saline and MTX injection were used as control (Fig. 7). Tumor-bearing mice were randomly divided into five groups (n = 8): saline (blank control), MTX injection (positive control, 8 mg/Kg mice), and three MTX/PGD NPs agents (test groups, 2, 4, 8 mg equivalent MTX/Kg mice), which were applied every two days for 5 times. The tumor volume and body weight were monitored every two days for 10 days. At the end of this in vivo experiment, the tumors of all different groups were removed, photographed, and weighted. The tumor sizes from nanoparticles groups were obviously smaller than those from both blank control and MTX injection groups (Fig. 7c). As shown in Fig. 7a, the time-related tumor volume increase was observed, the tumor sizes in saline control group increased by 23.0-fold. Compared to saline control group, MTX injection group only presented moderate antitumor efficacy, tumor volume increased by 17.4-fold. In contrast, the three test groups treated with nanoparticles produced dose-dependent antitumor effects, the dose was selected as 2, 4, and 8 mg/Kg and the tumor volume increased by 18.3-fold, 13.5-fold, and 9.6-fold respectively. The statistically significant difference was obtained for mice treated with three nanoparticles groups compared with saline control group (p < 0.001), and two nanopaticles groups with the dose of 4 and 8 mg/Kg showed the statistically significant difference compared with MTX injection group (p < 0.001).

Figure 7. In vivo antitumor efficacy of MTX/PGD NPs by the intravenous route: tumor volume change of 4T1 bearing BALB/c mice (a), body weight change (b), tumor images (c) in 4T1 bearing BALB/c mice.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

For each animal, five consecutive doses were given (marked by arrows). Data represent mean ± SD (n = 8). **p < 0.001 vs. saline control group, ##p < 0.001 vs. MTX injection.

Calculated tumor inhibition rates based on the averaged weight of the tumors, which were removed from all five groups at the end of this in vivo experiment, further indicating the better antitumor effect by the MTX/PGD NPs (Supporting Information, Table S2). The average tumor weight of the saline control, MTX injection, and three test groups were 0.92 ± 0.06, 0.51 ± 0.02, 0.63 ± 0.04, 0.41 ± 0.03, and 0.20 ± 0.03 g, respectively. Relative to the saline control, the inhibition rates were 44.8% and 31.7%, 55.4%, 78.5% for the MTX injection and three nanoparticles groups, which were statistically significant different (p < 0.001). Relative to the MTX injection, the inhibition effect was enhanced by approximately 2-fold under the same dose 8 mg/Kg, furthermore, the higher inhibition effect was observed even reducing the dose to 4 mg/Kg, and both of them presented statistically significant difference (p < 0.001). Either from tumor growth progression curves or the final weight of the tumor, the MTX/PGD NPs exhibited higher antitumor efficacy, which was in good agreement with these results from in vitro antitumor efficacy and cell uptake efficacy. Enhanced inhibition activity of MTX/PGD NPs could be attributed to longer blood circulation, potential higher accumulation in tumor via EPR effect, and higher cell uptake efficacy41,42.

The change in the body weight of mice in the whole experiment and blood biochemistry analysis at the end of this in vivo experiment were carried out to investigate the adverse effects of the nanoparticles. As seen in Fig. 7b, the mice treated with all five agents grew at approximately 20% of their initial weight, and no statistically difference was observed among them (p > 0.05), suggesting a low level potential of systemic toxicity. Furthermore, liver function markers including alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and the kidney function markers such as blood urea nitrogen, creatinine were measured to evaluate the safety of drug-loaded nanoparticles (Supplementary Information, Table S2). These results from test groups showed no significant difference when compared with the saline group (p > 0.05), suggesting no obvious hepatic or renal toxicity43. All these results of in vivo antitumor studies indicated that MTX/PGD NPs could improve antitumor efficacy without significant toxicity.

In/Ex Vivo Tumor Targeted Imaging

To evaluate the biodistribution in various organs and tumor tissue of MTX/PGD NPs, DIR as the fluorescent dye was used to label nanoparticles and the fluorescence imaging study was performed with 4T1 bearing mice, the results were shown in Fig. 8. In vivo fluorescent images were taken at different time after intravenously. As shown in Fig. 8a, during the whole monitoring procedure, the nanoparticles were found to accumulate into tumor at 1 h after intravenous injection, while extremely weak signal was found in tumors from the mice treated with MTX injection. Meanwhile, for nanoparticle groups, strong signals were detected in livers and spleens. All mice were sacrificed at 24 h after intravenous injection, the tumors and main organs were removed and fluorescencently imaged (Fig. 8b). Compared to injection group, the tumors in nanoparticle groups showed the strong fluorescence signals (p < 0.01). Besides, the signals in liver, spleen, lung, and kidney were strengthened. The average signals further confirmed the ex-vivo images well as shown in Fig. 8c. These results suggested that nanoparticles were mainly distributed in the tumor tissue due to the EPR effect, as well as reticuloendothelial system (RES) organs such as liver, spleen, and kidney.

Figure 8. The in vivo and ex-vivo typical fluorescence images.

Figure 8

Open in a new tab

The mice bearing 4T1 tumors were injected one time with DIR labeled MTX injection and nanoparticles (MTX equivalent, 8 mg Kg−1): In vivo images of mice after 0.5, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 h post injection (a), ex-vivo fluorescence images of main tissues, all the organs and tumors were placed in the order of (heart, liver, spleen, lung, kidney, brain, and tumor) after 24 h post injection (b), intensity of fluorescent signal in organs and tumor after 24 h post injection (c). *p < 0.01 vs. MTX injection.

Conclusions

In this study, amphiphilic codendrimer PGD was utilized to prepare spherical methotrexate nanoparticles (MTX/PGD NPs) via antisolvent precipitation method augmented by ultrasonication, with the mean diameter of approximately 182.4 nm and a very narrow size distribution, and the DLC was 85.2%. The FALT and surface element analysis results suggested the amphiphilic codendrimer PGD was dispersed on the surface of MTX nanoparticles. Besides, MTX/PGD nanoparticles showed higher stability and sustained release for 48 h in vitro. The MTX/PGD nanoparticles presented promising high tumor inhibition and biosafety, which was confirmed by in vitro cytotoxicity study, cell uptake, biodistribution in tumor tissue, in vivo tumor growth inhibition, and blood biochemistry analysis. These results suggested the potential advantages of MTX/PGD nanoparticles as safe and efficient drug delivery system for anticancer therapy in clinic.

Materials and Methods

Materials

Codendrimer (PGD) was synthesized according to pervious papers44. Methotrexate (MTX, purity >98%) was purchased from Shanghai Heng Yuan Bio-Tech Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Dialysis membrane of molecular weight cut-off of 14000 Da was obtained from Spectrapor. Normal saline solution was purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (America). Other reagents and solvents were purchased of analytical grade and obtained from commercial company.

The human breast cancer cell line (MCF-7 cells) and murine 4T1 breast cancer cell line (4T1 cells) were purchased from the Institute of Basic Medical Science, Chinese Academy of Medical Science (Beijing, China). RPMI-1640 was purchased from Hyclone Thermo Scientific (America). Fetal bovine serum (FBS, 10%) was purchased from Gibco Thermo Scientific (America), and 100 unit/mL penicicillin G and streptomycin were purchased from Biotopped Science & Technology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China).

Male BALB/c mice (20 ± 2 g), male Sprague-Dawley rats (200 ± 20 g) and male nu/nu nude mice (20 ± 2 g) were purchased from Vital River Laboratory Animal Technology Co., Ltd (Beijing, China). All the animals were acclimatized in a laminar flow room at controlled temperature of 25 ± 2 °C, relative humidity of 50–60% and 12 h light-dark cycles with standard diet ad libitum for 1 week prior to experimentation. All experimental procedures comply with the Guidelines and Policies for Ethical and Regulatory for Animal Experiments as approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Peking Union Medical College (Beijing, China).

Preparation of MTX-PGD NPs

MTX/PGD nanoparticles (MTX/PGD NPs) were prepared via antisolvent precipitation augmented by ultrasonication. Briefly, MTX (16 mg) and PGD (2 mg) was dissolved in DMF (1 mL) in the glass vial, and then the DMF solution was injected into deionized water (5 mL) at room temperature under continuous ultrasonication (250 W) for 10 min. The mixed solution was transferred into the dialysis bag (MWCO 14000) and dialyzed against deionized water (4 × 1 L) for 4 h to remove DMF and the free drug. To quantify the drug-loading content (DLC), the drug in the nanoparticles was collected by lyophilized and analyzed by HPLC (UltiMate 3000, DIONEX) using a UV detector operated at 306 nm. The quantitative analysis was carried out on a Thermo C18 (4.60 mm × 250 mm, 5 μm) and compared to a calibration curve generated from 9:1 PBS (pH = 7.4, 0.1 M):CH3CN (y = 1.36x + 0.03, R2 = 0.9999). The flow rate was 1.0 mL/min, and the sample injection volume was 20 μL. The DLC was calculated as follows, the experiments were conducted in triplicates, and the data were shown as the mean values plus standard deviation (±SD).

graphic file with name srep28983-m1.jpg

Particle Size and Zeta Potential Measurements

The particle size, size distribution, and zeta potential analysis of MTX/PGD NPs were determined by the dynamic light scattering (DLS) using a Zetasizer Nano-ZS analyzer (Malvern Instruments, UK) with an integrated 4 mV He-Ne laser, λ = 633 nm, which used the backscattering detection (scattering angle θ = 173°) at room temperature. Samples were prepared in deionized water at a concentration of 1 mg/mL. The experiments were conducted in triplicates. The data were shown as the mean values plus standard deviation (±SD).

Measurement of the Fixed Aqueous Layer Thickness (FALT)

The MTX/PGD NPs were centrifuged at 25 °C for 20 min at 13000 rpm to obtain the nanoparticles, and the pellet was washed with a phosphate buffer solution. Then the pellet was resuspended in NaCl solutions of different ion concentrations. The zeta potential was measured and the calculation of FALT (L) was based on the linear correlation between ln ζ (zeta potential) and κ (Debye–Huckel parameter): ln ζ = ln A−κL. Where A is regarded as constant and κ is Debye–Huckel parameter, expressed as κ = Inline graphic/0.3 for univalent salts where C is the molarity of electrolytes. The slope L gives the position of the slipping plane or thickness of the fixed aqueous layer in nm units. The experiments were conducted in triplicates. The data were shown as the mean values plus standard deviation (±SD).

Transmission Electron Microscope

Transmission electronic microscopy (TEM) measurements were performed on a JEM-1400, operating at an acceleration voltage of 80 kV. A drop of MTX/PGD NPs (0.2 mg/mL) was placed on carbon-coated copper grid. After 2 min, the grid was drained by filter paper to remove the aqueous solution, air-drying at room temperature, and then dyeing with uranyl acetate solution (2%, w/v).

Scanning Electron Microscope and Surface Element Analysis

The morphology and surface chemical composition of MTX bulk powders and MTX/PGD NPs were investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) with Energy Dispersive Spectrometer (SEM-EDS; S-4800, Hitachi Limited., Tokyo, Japan). MTX bulk powders and MTX/PGD NPs were lyophilized directly, a drop of MTX/PGD NPs solution (0.2 mg/mL) was placed on matrix and air-drying, then these samples were sputter-coated with a conductive layer of gold-palladium (Au/Pd) for 1 min. An accelerating potential of 30 mV was used for the observation and analysis.

Stability Study

For the storage stability study, MTX/PGD NPs were stored at 4, 25, and 37 °C over 14 days separately. The particle size and polydispersity index (PDI) of the samples were measured at 0, 1, 3, 7, and 14 days. The experiments were conducted in triplicates, and the data were shown as the mean values plus standard deviation (±SD).

For the stability study under physiological conditions, MTX/PGD NPs were suspended in plasma at 37 °C over 12 h, and the particle size of the samples was measured at 0, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 h. The experiments were conducted in triplicates, and the data were shown as the mean values plus standard deviation (±SD).

For the lyophilized stability study, after freeze-drying, MTX/PGD NPs were resuspended in water under transient ultrasonication to their original concentration and characterized by DLS. The particle size, PDI, and zeta potential were measured. The experiments were conducted in triplicates, and the data were shown as the mean values plus standard deviation (±SD).

Differential Scanning Calorimetry

Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) measurements were carried out in aluminum pans with lids using a DSC Q200 (TA Co., USA) under dynamic nitrogen atmosphere. Thermograms were obtained by heating the samples from 20 to 280 °C with a scan rate of 10 °C/min.

X-ray Diffraction Analysis

The X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis was performed using graphite filtered CuKα radiation (λ = 1.54 Å) at 40 KV and 100 mA with a scanning rate of 8 degree per minute (2θ from 3° to 80°) by a Japan D/Max 2500PC X-ray diffractomer (Rigaku, Japan) at room temperature. MTX mixed with PGD in the same ratio of MTX/PGD nanoparticles were used for all the experiments.

In vitro Studies on Release Kinetics

In vitro release characteristics of MTX/PGD NPs were studied by the dialysis method. Briefly, MTX/PGD nanoparticles solution (1 mL) was placed in a dialysis bag (MWCO 14000), then immersed in 50 mL of 150 mM NaCl solution. The release studies were performed at 37 °C with continuous magnetic stirring at 100 rpm under sink conditions. A control experiment using of MTX injection solution was also carried out under similar conditions. At predetermined time intervals, 5 mL external solution was withdrawn for analysis and an equal volume of fresh media was replenished. The drug release study was performed for 48 h and all release experiments were performed in triplicates. The amount of MTX released was quantified by a UV-HPLC, the data were shown as the mean values plus standard deviation (±SD).

Hemolytic Effect

Approximately 2 mL of blood was taken from the orbital venous plexus of a male Sprague–Dawley rat and centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 5 min. The plasma supernatant was removed, and the erythrocytes were resuspended in normal saline solution. The MTX/PGD NPs were incubated with the 2% (w/v) RBC suspension at 37 °C for 5 h with different concentrations. Then the RBCs were removed by centrifugation, 150 μL of the supernatant was pipetted into a 96-microwell plate, and the absorbance was measured at 540 nm using a microplate reader (Versamax Tunable Microplate Reader). The results were expressed as percentage hemolysis with the assumption that deionized water caused 100% hemolysis and NS solution 0% hemolysis. The experiments were conducted in triplicate, and the data were shown as the mean values plus standard deviation (±SD).

MTT Assays

The in vitro cytotoxicity against the human breast cancer cell line (MCF-7 cells) and murine 4T1 breast cancer cell line (4T1 cells) were evaluated by an MTT assay. Briefly, cells were seeded in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, and 100 units/mL penicicillin G and streptomycin at 37 °C with 5% CO2 in 96-well plates at a density of 8000 cells per well. After incubation for 48 h, the growth medium was replaced with fresh RPMI-1640. Then, PGD, MTX/PGD NPs, and MTX injection were added into the wells. After incubation for 48 h, 10 μL MTT solutions (5 mg/mL) were added to each well and incubation were continued for another 4 h. The medium was removed and 150 μL DMSO was added into each well to dissolve the formazan by pipetting up and down for several times. The absorbance of solution in each well was measured using an ELISA plate reader at a test wavelength of 570 nm to determine the OD value. The cell inhibition rate was calculated as follows. Cell inhibition = (1-ODtreated/ODcontrol) × 100%, where ODtreated was obtained for the cells treated by the nanoparticles, ODcontrol was obtained for the cells treated by the culture medium, and the other culture conditions were the same. Each experiment was done in quintuplicates. The data were shown as the mean values plus standard deviation (±SD).

In Vitro Cellular Uptake of MTX/PGD NPs

The 4T1 cells (1 × 105 per cell) were seeded in a 6-well plate and cultured at 37 °C for 24 h in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2, then the cy5.5 labeled agents were added into the 6-well plate. After 4 h of additional incubation at 37 °C, the medium was removed and the cells were washed with PBS three times, fixed with 4% of paraformaldehyde PBS solution for 15 min. The cellular uptake images were recorded with Delta Vision Microscopy Imaging Systems (λ = 670 nm), and all the images and average fluorescence intensity were recorded under the same condition.

In Vivo Antitumor Activity

In vivo antitumor activity was evaluated using 4T1 bearing BALB/c mice models. Briefly, male BALB/c mice (5–6 weeks, 18–22 g) were induced 4T1 tumor by subcutaneous injection of 0.2 mL cell suspension containing 2 × 106 4T1 cells into the right armpit. When tumor exceeded 50 mm3 (5 days after implantation), mice were randomly divided into 5 groups (8 mice per group). Mice were administrated with saline (control group), MTX injection at a dose of 8 mg/Kg (positive group), MTX/PGD NPs at a dose of 2, 4, and 8 mg/Kg (test groups) in the final volume of 0.2 mL via the tail vein every 2 days for 5 times. Tumor volume was measured every two days with a caliper, and calculated by the following formula: tumor volume (mm3) = 0.5 × L × W2, where L and W represent the largest diameter and the smallest diameter, respectively. The body weight of the mice was monitored as an index of systemic toxicity. All animals were sacrificed on the 10th day and the tumors were excised, weighted. The inhibition rate of the tumor was calculated as follows: IR = (tumor weight of positive or treated group/tumor weight of the control group) × 100%. The data were shown as the mean values plus standard deviation (n = 8).

Plasma samples separated from the blood samples were also collected at the end of the experiment by centrifugation. The level of aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and creatinine (CRE) were determined by routine clinical laboratory techniques.

Biodistribution in 4T1-Tumor Bearing Mice

To determine the in vivo biodistribution further, male nu/nu nude mice bearing 4T1 tumor model was established. Briefly, 2 × 106 4T1 cells were inoculated subcutaneously into the right armpit of the nude mice (4–5 weeks, 14–16 g). When the tumor exceeded 200 mm3 (10 days after implantation), the mice were randomly divided into 2 groups (6 mice per group), and treated with DIR/MTX solution and DIR/MTX NPs intravenously at the dosage of 0.2 μg DIR/mice, respectively. The real-time distribution and tumor accumulation of free DIR/HCPT solution and DIR/HCPT NPs were recorded at 0.5, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 h post injection using an in vivo imaging system (IVIS Spectrum 200, Perkin-Elmer Co., MA, USA). Mice were sacrificed at 24 h after post-injection and the tissues were excised and observed by the imaging system. The signal intensity of different tissues was quantified as the sum of all the detected photon counts within the region of interest (ROI) in the unit of [p/s/cm2/sr]/[μW/cm2].

Statistical Analysis

The results obtained from hydrodynamic diameter, drug-loading and release experiments, cytotoxicity were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 19.0 software. Student’s t-test was used to evaluate the differences between groups, and P < 0.05 was considered significant.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Zhao, Y. et al. Methotrexate Nanoparticles Prepared with Codendrimer from Polyamidoamine (PAMAM) and Oligoethylene Glycols (OEG) Dendrons: Antitumor Efficacy in Vitro and in Vivo. Sci. Rep. 6, 28983; doi: 10.1038/srep28983 (2016).

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information
srep28983-s1.docx (510.9KB, docx)

Acknowledgments

This work is financially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 21444003), PUMC Youth Fund (no. 33320140184) and PUMC Graduate Innovation Fund (no. 2015-1007-17).

Footnotes

Author Contributions Y.Z. and Y.G. wrote most of main text and figures. Y.G. conceived the experiment(s). Y.Z., R.L. and T.W. conducted the experiment(s). M.H., C.Z. and X.W. analysed the results. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

References

  1. Mangaiyarkarasi R., Chinnathambi S., Aruna P. & Ganesan S. Synthesis and formulation of methotrexate (MTX) conjugated LaF3:Tb3+/chitosan nanoparticles for targeted drug delivery applications. Biomed. Pharmacother. 69, 170–178 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Abdelbary A. A., Li X., El-Nabarawi M., Elassasy A. & Jasti B. Effect of fixed aqueous layer thickness of polymeric stabilizers on zeta potential and stability of aripiprazole nanosuspensions. Pharm. Dev. Technol. 18, 730–735 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Parker L. M., Griffiths C. T., Yankee R. A., Knapp R. C. & Canellos G. P. High-dose methotrexate with leucovorin rescue in ovarian cancer: A phase II study. Cancer. Treat. Rep. 63, 275–279 (1979). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Muss H. B. et al. Methotrexate in advanced endometrial carcinoma:A phase II trial of the gynecologic oncology group. Am. J. Clin. Oncol. 13, 61–63 (1990). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Colleoni M. et al. Low-dose oral methotrexate and cyclophosphamide in metastatic breast cancer: antitumor activity and correlation with vascular endothelial growth factor levels. Ann. Oncol. 13, 73–80 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Vis A. et al. A phase II trial of methotrexate-human serum albumin (MTX-HSA) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who progressed under immunotherapy. Cancer Chemother. Pharm. 49, 342–345 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Zanetta S. et al. A dose finding and pharmacokinetic study of docetaxel (TXT) and methotrexate (MTX) in patients with epithelial cancer. Eur. J. Cancer. 35, S288 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  8. Jacot W. et al. Carmustine-methotrexate combination in breast cancer patients presenting with brain metastases. Cancer Res. 69, 6119 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lisa B. P. & Blanchette J. O. Nanoparticle and targeted systems for cancer therapy. Adv. Drug Deliver. Rev. 56, 1649–1659 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Karasulu H. Y., Karabulut B., Göker E., Güneri T. & Gabor F. Controlled release of methotrexate from W/O microemulsion and its in vitro antitumor activity. Drug Deliv. 14, 225–233 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Weinstein J. N., Magin R. L., Yatvin M. B. & Zaharko D. S. Liposomes and local hyperthermia: Selective delivery of methotrexate to heated tumors. Science 204, 188–191 (1979). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ming-Hsin L. et al. Dendrimer-based multivalent methotrexates as dual acting nanoconjugates for cancer cell targeting. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 47c, 560–572 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Nogueira D. R. et al. In vitro antitumor activity of methotrexate via pH-sensitive chitosan nanoparticles. Biomaterials 34, 2758–2772 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Tatiane S., Fabio S. M., Ariane P. C. & Angela M. D. C. Development and validation of a fast RP-HPLC method for determination of methotrexate entrapment efficiency in polymeric nanocapsules. J. Chromatogr. Sci. 46, 505–509 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Zhang Y., Jin T. & Zhuo R. X. Methotrexate-loaded biodegradable polymeric micelles: Preparation, physicochemical properties and in vitro drug release. Colloid. Surface. B 44, 104–109 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. van Nostrum C. F. Polymeric micelles to deliver photosensitizers for photodynamic therapy. Adv. Drug. Deliv. Rev. 56, 9–16 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Khan Z. A., Tripathi R. & Mishra B. Methotrexate: A detailed review on drug delivery and clinical aspects. Expert Opin. Drug Del. 9, 151–169 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Wosikowski K. et al. In vitro and in vivo antitumor activity of methotrexate conjugated to human serum albumin in human cancer cells. Clin. Cancer Res. 9, 1917–1926 (2003). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Afshari M., Derakhshandeh K. & Hosseinzadeh L. Characterisation, cytotoxicity and apoptosis studies of methotrexate-loaded PLGA and PLGA-PEG nanoparticles. J. Microencapsul. 31, 239–245 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Taheri A. et al. Enhanced anti-tumoral activity of methotrexate-human serum albumin conjugated nanoparticles by targeting with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) peptide. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 12, 4591–4608 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Taheri A., Dinarvand R., Ahadi F., Khorramizadeh M. R. & Atyabi F. The in vivo antitumor activity of LHRH targeted methotrexate–human serum albumin nanoparticles in 4T1 tumor-bearing Balb/c mice. Int. J. Pharm. 431, 183–189 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Chen J. et al. Methotrexate-loaded PEGylated chitosan nanoparticles: Synthesis, characterization, and in vitro and in vivo antitumoral activity. Mol. Pharm. 11, 2213–2223 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Liu Y. et al. Core–shell nanoparticles based on pullulan and poly(β-amino) ester for hepatoma-targeted codelivery of gene and chemotherapy agent. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 6, 18712–18720 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Thomas T. P. et al. Polyvalent dendrimer-methotrexate as a folate receptor-targeted cancer therapeutic. Mol. Pharm. 9, 2669–2676 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Guo Y., Zhao Y., Han M., Hao C. & Wang X. Codendrimer (PAG) from polyamidoamine (PAMAM) and oligoethylene glycols (OEG) dendron: Evaluation as drug carrier. J. Mater. Chem. 1, 6078–6084 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Zhao Y. et al. A series of codendrimers from polyamidoamine (PAMAM) and oligoethylene glycols (OEG) dendrons as drug carriers: The effects of OEG dendron decorated degree. RSC Adv. 5, 85547–85555 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  27. Duncan R., Connors T. A. & Meada H. Drug targeting in cancer therapy: The magic bullet, what next? J. Drug. Target. 3, 317–319 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Schmalenberg K. E., Frauchiger L., Nikkhouy-Albers L. & Uhrich K. E. Cytotoxicity of a unimolecular polymeric micelle and its degradation products. Biomacromolecules 2, 851–855 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Liu J., Gong T., Wang C., Zhong Z. & Zhang Z. Solid lipid nanoparticles loaded with insulin by sodium cholate-phosphatidylcholine-based mixed micelles: Preparation and characterization. Int. J. Pharm. 340, 153–162 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Sadzuka Y. & Hirota S. Physical properties and tissue distribution of adriamycin encapsulated in polyethyleneglycol-coated liposomes. Adv. Drug. Deliv. Rev. 24, 257–263 (1997). [Google Scholar]
  31. Bin S., Chao F. & Yuanying P. Stealth PEG-PHDCA niosomes: Effects of chain length of PEG and particle size on niosomes surface properties, in vitro drug release, phagocytic uptake, in vivo pharmacokinetics and antitumor activity. J. Pharm. Sci 95, 1873–1887 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Zhang H., Hu H., Dai W., Wang X. & Zhang Q. Effects of PEGylated paclitaxel nanocrystals on breast cancer and its lung metastasis. Nanoscale 7, 10790–10800 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Hirota S. & Duzgunes N. Physico-chemical approach to targeting phenomena. Curr. Drug. Discov. Technol. 8, 286–286 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Kojima C., Kono K., Maruyama K. & Takagishi T. Synthesis of polyamidoamine dendrimers having poly(ethylene glycol) grafts and their ability to encapsulate anticancer drugs. Bioconjugate Chem. 11, 910–917 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Jain V. et al. Paclitaxel loaded PEGylated gleceryl monooleate based nanoparticulate carriers in chemotherapy. Biomaterials 33, 7206–7220 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Vadia N. & Rajput S. Study on formulation variables of methotrexate loaded mesoporous MCM-41 nanoparticles for dissolution enhancement. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 45, 8–18 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Zhang Y. & Zhuo R. X. Synthesis and drug release behavior of poly (trimethylene carbonate)–poly (ethylene glycol)–poly (trimethylene carbonate) nanoparticles. Biomaterials 26, 2089–2094 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Ji J. et al. Preparation, characterization of hydrophilic and hydrophobic drug in combine loaded chitosan/cyclodextrin nanoparticles and in vitro release study. Colloid. Surface. B 83, 103–107 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Lou H. et al. Oridonin nanosuspension enhances anti-tumor efficacy in SMMC-7721 cells and H22 tumor bearing mice. Colloid. Surface. B 87, 319–325 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Fröhlich E. The role of surface charge in cellular uptake and cytotoxicity of medical nanoparticles. Int. J Nanomed. 7, 5577–5591 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. She W. H. et al. Dendronized heparin-doxorubicin conjugate based nanoparticle as pH-responsive drug delivery system for cancer therapy. Biomaterials 34, 2252–2264 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Zhang H., Hollis C. P., Zhang Q. & Li T. L. Preparation and antitumor study of camptothecin nanocrystals. Int. J. Pharm. 415, 293–300 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Chen Y. et al. The therapeutic effect of methotrexate-conjugated Pluronic-based polymeric micelles on the folate receptor-rich tumors treatment. Int. J Nanomed. 10, 4043–4057 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  44. Guo Y. et al. A codendrimer of PAMAM decorated with oligoethylene glycol dendrons: Synthesis, self-assembly, and application as a drug carrier. Soft Matter 9, 10306–10313 (2013). [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information
srep28983-s1.docx (510.9KB, docx)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES