Skip to main content
Environmental Health Perspectives logoLink to Environmental Health Perspectives
. 2015 Dec 18;124(7):1084–1092. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1409362

Prenatal Exposure to Organophosphorous Pesticides and Fetal Growth: Pooled Results from Four Longitudinal Birth Cohort Studies

Kim G Harley 1,, Stephanie M Engel 2, Michelle G Vedar 1, Brenda Eskenazi 1, Robin M Whyatt 3, Bruce P Lanphear 4, Asa Bradman 1, Virginia A Rauh 5, Kimberly Yolton 6, Richard W Hornung 6, James G Wetmur 7, Jia Chen 8, Nina T Holland 1, Dana Boyd Barr 9, Frederica P Perera 3, Mary S Wolff 8
PMCID: PMC4937849  PMID: 26685281

Abstract

Background:

Organophosphorous (OP) pesticides are associated with reduced fetal growth in animals, but human studies are inconsistent.

Objectives:

We pooled data from four cohorts to examine associations of prenatal OP exposure with birth weight (n = 1,169), length (n = 1,152), and head circumference (n = 1,143).

Methods:

Data were from the CHAMACOS, HOME, Columbia, and Mount Sinai birth cohorts. Concentrations of three diethyl phosphate (ΣDEP) and three dimethyl phosphate (ΣDMP) metabolites of OP pesticides [summed to six dialkyl phosphates (ΣDAPs)] were measured in maternal urine. Linear regression and mixed-effects models were used to examine associations with birth outcomes.

Results:

We found no significant associations of ΣDEP, ΣDMP, or ΣDAPs with birth weight, length, or head circumference overall. However, among non-Hispanic black women, increasing urinary ΣDAP and ΣDMP concentrations were associated with decreased birth length (β = –0.4 cm; 95% CI: –0.9, 0.0 and β = –0.4 cm; 95% CI: –0.8, 0.0, respectively, for each 10-fold increase in metabolite concentration). Among infants with the PON1192RR genotype, ΣDAP and ΣDMP were negatively associated with length (β = –0.4 cm; 95% CI: –0.9, 0.0 and β = –0.5 cm; 95% CI: –0.9, –0.1).

Conclusions:

This study confirms previously reported associations of prenatal OP exposure among black women with decreased infant size at birth, but finds no evidence of smaller birth weight, length, or head circumference among whites or Hispanics. Contrary to our hypothesis, we found stronger inverse associations of DAPs and birth outcome in infants with the less susceptible PON1192RR genotype. The large pooled data set facilitated exploration of interactions by race/ethnicity and PON1 genotype, but was limited by differences in study populations.

Citation:

Harley KG, Engel SM, Vedar MG, Eskenazi B, Whyatt RM, Lanphear BP, Bradman A, Rauh VA, Yolton K, Hornung RW, Wetmur JG, Chen J, Holland NT, Barr DB, Perera FP, Wolff MS. 2016. Prenatal exposure to organophosphorous pesticides and fetal growth: pooled results from four longitudinal birth cohort studies. Environ Health Perspect 124:1084–1092; http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1409362

Introduction

Organophosphorous (OP) pesticides, a widely used class of insecticides, have been the subject of concern in recent years because of their potential for developmental and neurobehavioral toxicity (Bouchard et al. 2011; Engel et al. 2011; Rauh et al. 2011). Two common OP pesticides, chlorpyrifos and diazinon, were removed from residential pesticide use between 2001 and 2004, largely due to concerns about effects on health (U.S. EPA 2001); however, applications in agriculture continue. Although use of OP pesticides has declined substantially in recent years, they still accounted for 35% of insecticides applied in the United States in 2007, the latest year for which data are available (Grube et al. 2011).

Several OP pesticides have been associated with reduced fetal growth in rodent studies (Breslin et al. 1996; Qiao et al. 2002; Spyker and Avery 1977; Srivastava and Raizada 1996), but studies in humans are inconsistent. Two studies have examined maternal or fetal blood concentrations of OP pesticides (Barr et al. 2010; Whyatt et al. 2004), and four studies have looked at maternal urinary concentrations of OP metabolites (Eskenazi et al. 2004; Rauch et al. 2012; Wang et al. 2012; Wolff et al. 2007). Chlorpyrifos concentrations in umbilical cord blood were inversely associated with birth weight and length in a population of low-income, African-American and Dominican women in New York City recruited before the household ban (Columbia cohort) (Whyatt et al. 2004). However, a similar study conducted after the ban found no associations with birth outcome among pregnant women in New Jersey whose chlorpyrifos concentrations were considerably lower than the Columbia study (Barr et al. 2010). Dialkyl phosphate (DAP) metabolites of OP pesticides in maternal urine were inversely associated with infant head circumference but not birth weight or length in a racially and economically diverse population of women in New York City (Mount Sinai cohort) (Wolff et al. 2007). Prenatal urinary DAP metabolites were associated with shorter length of gestation and nonsignificantly increased birth weight, length, and head circumference in a cohort of low-income predominantly Mexican women in California (Center for the Health Assessment of Mothers and Children of Salinas; CHAMACOS cohort) (Eskenazi et al. 2004). A study of pregnant women in Cincinnati, Ohio (Health Outcomes and Measures of the Environment; HOME study) found that prenatal urinary DAPs were associated with decreased birth weight in African-American mothers and shorter length of gestation in white mothers (Rauch et al. 2012). However, a study in Shanghai, China, found no association between maternal urinary DAPs at time of labor and birth weight or length (Wang et al. 2012).

Inconsistencies in these findings may be attributable to differences in timing of exposure (e.g., early vs. late pregnancy), measurement of OP exposure (e.g., parent compounds in blood vs. nonspecific DAP metabolites in urine), variability in OP mixtures (e.g., chlorpyrifos or diazinon used residentially vs. a wider range of OP compounds used in agriculture), and patterns of exposure (residential vs. agricultural vs. dietary exposure) across studies. Other challenges to integrating these disparate results include the diverse racial/ethnic compositions of these cohorts, which contribute to differing frequencies of key genetic modifiers, among other sources of heightened susceptibility. For example, paraoxonase (PON) is an enzyme that plays a key role in metabolism and detoxification of some OP pesticides (Costa et al. 2008). Paraoxonase levels and efficiency are influenced by several common single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the PON1 gene whose allele frequencies vary significantly in different racial groups (Costa et al. 2003). SNPs at the –108 position in the promoter region of the PON1 gene appear to influence an individual’s quantity of the paraoxonase enzyme (subjects with PON1–108TT genotype have approximately 20% less paraoxonase enzyme), whereas SNPs at the 192 position in the coding region affect the catalytic efficiency of that enzyme in detoxifying OP pesticides with PON192QQ coding for the enzyme with the lowest efficiency (Costa et al. 2003).

To explore relationships between prenatal OP exposure and birth outcomes and potential modification by the PON1 genotype and race/ethnicity, we pooled data from four previously published longitudinal studies—the CHAMACOS, HOME, Columbia, and Mount Sinai cohorts. We hypothesized that DAP metabolites would be inversely associated with fetal growth, and that this effect would be especially prominent in infants with the susceptible PON1 genotypes with lower enzyme concentration and catalytic efficiency.

Methods

The study sample combined participants from cohorts that measured urinary DAP metabolites during pregnancy. DAP concentrations from the CHAMACOS, HOME, and Mount Sinai cohorts have been previously reported (Eskenazi et al. 2004; Rauch et al. 2012; Wolff et al. 2007). DAP concentrations were measured on only a subset of the Columbia cohort and have not been published elsewhere. These four studies were conducted using similar methods, with some key differences (Table 1). The CHAMACOS study enrolled low-income women between 1999 and 2000 through prenatal clinics serving the farmworker population of the agricultural Salinas Valley, California (Eskenazi et al. 2004). Women were enrolled into the HOME study though prenatal clinics in metropolitan Cincinnati between 2003 and 2006 (Rauch et al. 2012). The Columbia cohort enrolled African-American and Dominican pregnant women living in northern Manhattan or the South Bronx between 1998 and 2006 (Perera et al. 2003; Whyatt et al. 2004), and the Mount Sinai cohort enrolled an ethnically diverse population of primiparous women receiving prenatal care at Mount Sinai Hospital in lower Manhattan between 1998 and 2002 (Berkowitz et al. 2004; Wolff et al. 2007). Major differences between the cohorts were the geographic, racial/ethnic, and socioeconomic characteristics of the populations. Mount Sinai was the only cohort limited to primiparous women. Additionally, the CHAMACOS and HOME cohorts enrolled participants before 20 weeks gestation and obtained two urinary DAP measures (early and late pregnancy), whereas Mount Sinai and Columbia obtained a single DAP measure in the third trimester. In all four cohorts, participants were at least 18 years of age and started prenatal care before 26 weeks gestation.

Table 1.

Study design of the individual cohorts.

Design element CHAMACOS HOME Columbia Mount Sinai
Study location Salinas Valley, CA Cincinnati, OH New York, NY New York, NY
Sample size n = 486 n = 344 n = 314 n = 404
Enrollment years 1999–2000 2003–2006 1998–2006 1998–2002
Mean gestational age at enrollment 14.1 weeks 16.1 weeks 33.3 weeks 31.8 weeks
Recruitment sites Six prenatal clinics serving farmworkers Seven prenatal clinics in Cincinnati Prenatal clinics at Harlem and NY Presbyterian hospitals Prenatal clinic at Mt. Sinai Hospital
Eligibility criteria
  • ≥ 18 years old

  • < 20 weeks gestation

  • English or Spanish speaking

  • Low income (Medicaid eligible)

  • ≥ 18 years old

  • < 19 weeks gestation

  • Living in 5 surrounding counties

  • Living in home built before 1978

  • HIV negative

  • 18–35 years old

  • African-American or Dominican identity

  • Living in Northern Manhattan or South Bronx at least 1 year

  • First prenatal visit < 20 weeks

  • No tobacco or drug use in pregnancy

  • No chronic medical conditions (HIV, diabetes, hypertension)

  • ≥ 18 years old

  • Primiparous

  • First prenatal visit ≤ 26 weeks

  • No alcohol or drug use in pregnancy

  • Singleton birth

  • No chronic medical conditions (diabetes, hypertension) or pregnancy complications

Race/ethnicity Mexican Various African American and Dominican Various

For the main analysis, we excluded women with hypertension, diabetes, and other pregnancy complications that might affect fetal growth; twins and multiple births; stillbirths and neonatal deaths; and women providing urine samples that were dilute (< 10 mg/dL creatinine). The pooled data set included 1,235 women with urinary DAP measures during pregnancy and birth outcome data from each cohort: 484 women from the CHAMACOS study, 328 women from the HOME study, 82 women from Columbia, and 341 women from Mount Sinai. Informed consent was obtained from all women, and study procedures were approved by the institutional review boards at each research institution.

Data Collection

In each cohort, mothers were interviewed during pregnancy in their preferred language (English or Spanish). Data collected in common across the four cohorts included demographic information (age, marital status, race, ethnicity, country of birth, educational attainment), behavioral factors (smoking, alcohol, drug use during pregnancy), and pregnancy health (parity, prenatal care use, pregnancy complications). Household income was not collected in one cohort (Mount Sinai) and thus could not be included in the pooled data set; because maternal education level was collected in all cohorts, it was used as a proxy for socioeconomic status.

Infant weight, length, and head circumference at birth were abstracted from medical records at each location. Gestational age at birth was calculated by maternal report of last menstrual period (HOME study) or abstracted from medical records (CHAMACOS, Columbia, Mount Sinai). Because Columbia and Mount Sinai measured OP exposure in a late stage of pregnancy, there was a truncated range in gestational age outcomes and few preterm births in these cohorts, limiting power to detect associations with gestational duration. Thus, gestational age at birth was examined as a covariate in the models of fetal growth, but not as an outcome in the pooled analyses.

Organophosphorous Pesticide Exposure

In each cohort, spot urine samples were collected from pregnant women at the time of interview. This included two urine samples from women in the CHAMACOS (mean, 13.9 and 26.5 weeks gestation) and HOME (mean, 15.9 and 26.4 weeks gestation) cohorts and one urine collection from women in the Columbia (mean, 33.3 weeks gestation) and Mount Sinai (mean, 31.8 weeks gestation) cohorts. All urinary DAP measurements were conducted by the same laboratory at the Center for Disease Control and Prevention using gas chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS) and quantified using isotope dilution calibration (Bravo et al. 2002). Limits of detection (LODs) varied among the centers and ranged from 0.1 to 0.7 μg/L (see Table S1). Six individual DAP metabolites were quantified: three dimethyl phosphate (DMP) metabolites (dimethylphosphate, dimethylthiophosphate, dimethyldithiophosphate), derived from OP pesticides such as malathion and dimethoate; and three diethyl phosphate (DEP) metabolites (diethylphosphate, diethylthiophosphate, diethyldithiophosphate), derived from OP pesticides such as chlorpyrifos and diazinon. These DAP metabolites, in units of nanomoles per liter, were summed to yield ΣDMP, ΣDEP, and total ΣDAP for each individual. Many women had concentrations below the LOD for one or more of the metabolites, but only 25 women (2.1%) were below the LOD on all 6 metabolites (see Table S1). In cases where individual metabolite concentrations were below the LOD, the machine-read value was used if available or, if not, a non-zero, random number below the LOD was substituted before the individual DAPs were summed. The random values were selected from all values below the LOD using log-normal probability distributions whose cohort-specific parameters were obtained by maximum likelihood estimation (Lubin et al. 2004). Summed concentrations (ΣDMP, ΣDEP, and ΣDAP) were truncated at 3 standard deviations below the geometric mean of the pooled data set to avoid influentially low values. Creatinine concentrations in urine, measured using commercially available diagnostic enzyme methods, were used to account for urinary dilution. Creatinine-corrected ΣDMP, ΣDEP, and ΣDAP concentrations were log10-transformed for analysis. For the Columbia and Mount Sinai cohorts, the results of the single urinary measurements were used; for the HOME and CHAMACOS studies, the two measurements during pregnancy were averaged. The correlations between the two ΣDAP concentrations during pregnancy were 0.16 and 0.25 for CHAMACOS and HOME, respectively.

PON1 Genotype

PON1192 and PON1–108 genotyping was conducted separately at each research center using polymerase chain reaction (PCR)–based methods using umbilical cord blood for children and maternal blood. Genotyping methods have been previously published for the CHAMACOS cohort (Holland et al. 2006), the HOME Study (Rauch et al. 2012), and the Mount Sinai cohort (Chen et al. 2003). Mothers and children were genotyped as QQ, QR, or RR for PON1 192 and TT, CT, or TT for PON1–108. Maternal PON1–108 genotype was not available from the HOME study, and maternal PON1192 genotype was not available from the HOME or Columbia cohorts.

Data Analysis

We first compared demographic characteristics and urinary metabolite concentrations across the four cohorts. We examined the associations of urinary ΣDAP, ΣDEP, and ΣDMP concentrations with infant birth weight, length, and head circumference in the pooled data set using multivariable linear regression. We evaluated effect modification by cohort and performed analyses adjusted for and stratified by cohort. We fit mixed-effects models with random slope and intercept, allowing for different associations in each cohort, and with random intercept only. Mixed-effects model estimates for associations between DAP metabolites and the outcomes were similar to estimates from models that did not include random effects for cohort (data not shown), and mixed-effects models did not have significantly better performance based on likelihood ratio tests (α = 0.05), so estimates from mixed-effects models are not reported.

Creatinine-corrected, urinary DAP metabolites were considered as continuous (log10 transformed) variables. All models controlled for cohort, sex, self-identified race/ethnicity [non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, Hispanic (regardless of race), and other], country of origin (USA vs. other), maternal education (< high school vs. ≥ high school), parity (primiparous vs. multiparous), smoking during pregnancy (yes vs. no), marital status (married/living together vs. other), and maternal age (continuous) (Table 2). Covariate information was missing for 66 women, reducing the final sample size to 1,169 for birth weight, 1,152 for length, and 1,143 for head circumference models. The Hispanic category included women of Mexican, Puerto Rican, Dominican, and other Hispanic descent. To examine fetal growth independent of gestational age, we controlled for gestational age at birth using a cubic spline. We tested for effect modification by race/ethnicity, sex, maternal education, and child PON1192 and PON1–108 genotype by including cross-product interaction terms (e.g. for effect modification of DAPs by the 4-level race/ethnicity variable, we constructed 3 cross-product terms: black × DAPs, Hispanic × DAPs, other × DAPs). We compared models with and without the cross-product terms using Wald tests to examine overall categories of each potential modifier rather than category-by-category tests of interaction. We considered interaction to be statistically significant at α = 0.1. Stratified analyses were conducted according to cohort, race/ethnicity, and maternal and child PON1 genotype using separate models to obtain stratum-specific estimates. Because of the small size, the race/ethnicity category of “other” was omitted from stratified models, although it was included in the models with interaction terms. PON1 genotype was the most commonly missing variable, so the sample size was reduced for these interaction models (n = 947–953 for infant and n = 736–804 for maternal genotype).

Table 2.

Participant characteristics of the individual cohorts and pooled data set.

Characteristic Pooled CHAMACOS HOME Columbia Mount Sinai p-Valuea
n Mean ± SD or % n Mean ± SD or % n Mean ± SD or % n Mean ± SD or % n Mean ± SD or %
Gestational age (weeks) 1,235 39.1 ± 1.6 484 38.9 ± 1.7 328 39.2 ± 1.5 82 39.4 ± 1.3 341 39.3 ± 1.5 < 0.01
Birth weight (g) 1,235 3385.0 ± 514.1 484 3449.7 ± 516.4 328 3407.0 ± 566.3 82 3417.0 ± 470.9 341 3264.1 ± 444.9 < 0.01
Length (cm) 1,218 50.6 ± 2.6 478 50.2 ± 2.7 321 51.0 ± 2.8 80 50.9 ± 2.4 339 50.7 ± 2.3 < 0.01
Head circumference (cm) 1,209 34.0 ± 1.6 468 34.1 ± 1.5 322 34.3 ± 1.8 79 34.0 ± 1.5 340 33.8 ± 1.6 < 0.01
Maternal age (years) 1,235 25.9 ± 5.9 484 25.9 ± 5.0 328 28.8 ± 5.6 82 24.1 ± 5.1 341 23.4 ± 6.2 < 0.01
Prepregnancy BMI (kg/m2) 1,215 25.6 ± 5.5 484 26.9 ± 5.1 313 26.0 ± 6.3 77 26.0 ± 5.8 341 23.3 ± 4.4 < 0.01
Pregnancy weight gain (lb) 1,186 32.3 ± 15.3 481 30.0 ± 12.4 324 27.1 ± 13.7 78 37.0 ± 16.9 303 40.2 ± 17.1 < 0.01
Child sex
Male 617 50.0 243 50.2 149 45.4 34 41.5 191 56.0 0.02
Female 618 50.0 241 49.8 179 54.6 48 58.5 150 44.0
Year of birth
1998 60 4.9 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 60 17.6 < 0.01
1999 123 10.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 123 36.1
2000 466 37.7 308 63.6 0 0.0 35 42.7 123 36.1
2001 258 20.9 176 36.4 0 0.0 47 57.3 35 10.3
2003 26 2.1 0 0.0 26 7.9 0 0.0 0 0.0
2004 129 10.4 0 0.0 129 39.3 0 0.0 0 0.0
2005 122 9.9 0 0.0 122 37.2 0 0.0 0 0.0
2006 51 4.1 0 0.0 51 15.5 0 0.0 0 0.0
Maternal race/ethnicity
Non-Hispanic white 288 23.4 8 1.7 210 64.4 0 0.0 70 20.5 < 0.01
Non-Hispanic black 220 17.8 0 0.0 94 28.8 35 42.7 91 26.7
Hispanic 693 56.2 463 95.7 9 2.8 47 57.3 174 51.0
Other 32 2.6 13 2.7 13 4.0 0 0.0 6 1.8
Maternal country of origin
Other 535 45.0 416 86.0 18 5.5 37 45.1 64 21.6 < 0.01
USA 653 55.0 68 14.0 308 94.5 45 54.9 232 78.4
Maternal education
Less than high school 546 44.3 381 78.7 35 10.7 30 36.6 100 29.4 < 0.01
Completed high school 686 55.7 103 21.3 291 89.3 52 63.4 240 70.6
Marital status
Single 382 31.0 96 19.8 65 19.9 64 78.1 157 46.0 < 0.01
Married/living together 851 69.0 388 80.2 261 80.1 18 22.0 184 54.0
Parity
Nulliparous 693 56.2 162 33.5 143 43.9 47 57.3 341 100.0 < 0.01
Multiparous 540 43.8 322 66.5 183 56.1 35 42.7 0 0.0
Smoking during pregnancy
No 1,086 89.4 454 93.8 268 87.0 80 97.6 284 83.3 < 0.01
Yes 129 10.6 30 6.2 40 13.0 2 2.44 57 16.7
Child PON–108
TT 167 16.9 76 17.6 52 17.9 14 20.6 25 12.6 < 0.01
CT 453 45.8 224 52.0 113 38.8 32 47.1 84 42.2
CC 369 37.3 131 30.4 126 43.3 22 32.4 90 45.2
Child PON192
QQ 300 30.1 108 24.8 117 39.8 14 20.9 61 30.5 < 0.01
QR 450 45.2 222 51.0 115 39.1 25 37.3 88 44.0
RR 246 24.7 105 24.1 62 21.1 28 41.8 51 25.5
Maternal PON–108
TT 165 19.5 103 23.0 14 20.6 48 14.5 < 0.01
CT 374 44.1 218 48.7 31 45.6 125 37.7
CC 309 36.4 127 28.3 23 33.8 159 47.9
Maternal PON192
QQ 220 28.2 125 27.9 95 28.6 0.76
QR 364 46.7 206 46.0 158 47.6
RR 196 25.1 117 26.1 79 23.8
BMI, body mass index. ap-Values for differences across cohorts. F-tests for continuous variables, chi-square tests for categorical variables.

After constructing final models, we conducted sensitivity analyses including a) limiting analyses to nulliparous women, b) limiting to term births, c) treating values < LOD as LOD divided by the square root of 2, d) classifying women identifying as Hispanic black (e.g. Dominicans) as black rather than Hispanic, e) including women with pregnancy complications such as hypertension and diabetes, f) using DAP concentrations that were not corrected for creatinine, and g) using only one (late pregnancy) DAP measurement from the HOME and CHAMACOS cohorts. All analyses were conducted in Stata 13.

Results

The four cohorts differed on every characteristic measured, including racial/ethnic composition, country of origin, maternal education, and marital status (Table 2). The Columbia cohort was exclusively African American and Hispanic (Dominican); the CHAMACOS cohort predominantly Hispanic (Mexican); the Mount Sinai cohort racially diverse, but predominantly Hispanic (Puerto Rican); and the HOME study cohort largely white. Educational attainment was lowest in the CHAMACOS cohort and highest in the HOME study (21% vs. 89% completing high school, respectively). More women were married or living with their partner in the CHAMACOS and HOME studies (~ 80%) than in the two New York City studies (54% for Mount Sinai and 22% for Columbia). In the Columbia study, couples were defined as married/living together only if they had lived together at least 7 years, whereas the other studies included all cohabiting couples. Concentrations of urinary metabolites of OP pesticides in each cohort are shown in Table 3 (see also Figure S1). The geometric mean and median levels of total DAPs were highest in the agricultural CHAMACOS population, similar in the HOME study and Mount Sinai populations, and lowest in the Columbia cohort, despite the fact that the HOME study was the only study to enroll participants after the residential ban on chlorpyrifos (a DEP pesticide). The total DAP concentrations are dominated by DMP metabolites, with concentrations of DMP metabolites about three to four times greater than DEP metabolites.

Table 3.

Distributions of urinary metabolites of organophosphate pesticides (nmol/g creatinine) measured during pregnancy, by cohort and pooled.

Cohort n Geometric Mean (SD) < LOD (%) Percentile Maximum
25th 50th 75th 95th
CHAMACOSa
Total ΣDAP 484 105.63 (2.98) 0.0 50.3 102.0 220.9 697.0 3359.8
ΣDEP 484 16.41 (3.07) 0.0 7.8 16.3 34.8 100.6 453.5
ΣDMP 484 76.31 (3.63) 0.0 34.2 78.5 182.3 639.1 3228.9
HOMEa
Total ΣDAP 328 66.78 (3.52) 1.6 28.9 70.1 154.2 466.8 1715.4
ΣDEP 328 11.15 (4.47) 16.9 4.5 14.5 31.8 89.3 199.1
ΣDMP 328 44.61 (4.28) 4.8 16.5 46.4 115.1 448.3 1686.8
Columbia
Total ΣDAP 82 42.88 (7.44) 7.3 21.3 59.6 135.3 638.0 1622.8
ΣDEP 82 7.39 (13.38) 19.5 4.9 19.4 36.1 110.4 231.8
ΣDMP 82 11.36 (20.63) 25.6 2.9 29.1 110.3 445.4 1584.2
Mount Sinai
Total ΣDAP 341 75.54 (5.50) 4.1 29.5 77.9 209.0 894.7 8498.6
ΣDEP 341 12.79 (8.96) 14.4 6.9 19.4 52.9 163.1 1629.5
ΣDMP 341 41.10 (7.58) 5.6 13.3 47.3 153.9 760.4 8498.5
Pooled
Total ΣDAP 1,235 80.30 (4.14) 2.1 37.1 87.1 199.4 753.1 8498.6
ΣDEP 1,235 13.11 (5.49) 10.2 6.2 16.6 37.5 113.9 1629.5
ΣDMP 1,235 49.15 (5.94) 4.7 20.6 57.2 149.5 631.6 8498.5
Abbreviations: ΣDAP, dialkyl phosphate metabolites; ΣDEP, diethyl phosphate metabolites; ΣDMP, dimethyl phosphate metabolites. aCHAMACOS and HOME urinary metabolites are the average of two pregnancy measurements. Columbia and Mount Sinai are a single pregnancy measure.

No associations were seen between total urinary ΣDAP, ΣDEP, or ΣDMP and birth weight, length, and head circumference in the pooled cohort (Table 4). Associations with 10-fold increases in urinary ΣDAP concentrations were close to null for birth weight [β = 4.47; 95% confidence interval (CI): –35.56, 44.49], length (β = –0.00; 95% CI: –0.21, 0.22), and head circumference (β = –0.02; 95% CI: –0.16, 0.11). Estimates were similar for 10-fold increase in ΣDEP and ΣDMP metabolites (Table 4). Interactions with cohort were not statistically significant for any of the exposures or outcomes (p-values ranged from 0.11 to 0.85; Figure 1). Estimates stratified by cohort (Table 4 and Figure 1) were similar but not identical to those of previously published reports (Eskenazi et al. 2004; Rauch et al. 2012; Wolff et al. 2007) in which the CHAMACOS cohort tended to show positive trends of urinary OP metabolites with fetal growth while the other cohorts showed negative or null associations. Differences from previously reported results were attributable to slight changes in exclusions, sample size, covariates, correction for urinary dilution, and substitution methods for values < LOD.

Table 4.

Associations of 10-fold increases in urinary metabolites of organophosphate pesticides and fetal growth, by individual cohort and pooled data set.

Cohort, metabolite Birth weight (g) Length (cm) Head circumference
n β (95% CI) p-Value n β (95% CI) p-Value n β (95% CI) p-Value
CHAMACOS
Total ΣDAP 484 28.06 (–51.35, 107.46) 0.49 478 0.15 (–0.30, 0.61) 0.51 468 0.20 (–0.06, 0.46) 0.13
ΣDEP 484 66.59 (–10.09, 143.26) 0.09 478 0.22 (–0.22, 0.66) 0.32 468 0.27 (0.01, 0.52) 0.04
ΣDMP 484 16.25 (–51.31, 83.82) 0.64 478 0.10 (–0.29, 0.49) 0.62 468 0.13 (–0.10, 0.35) 0.26
HOME
Total ΣDAP 307 –28.29 (–130.43, 73.85) 0.59 300 –0.03 (–0.55, 0.48) 0.89 301 –0.19 (–0.53, 0.14) 0.26
ΣDEP 307 –22.84 (–104.18, 58.50) 0.58 300 –0.04 (–0.44, 0.37) 0.85 301 –0.05 (–0.32, 0.22) 0.70
ΣDMP 307 –5.71 (–92.62, 81.19) 0.90 300 0.02 (–0.42, 0.45) 0.93 301 –0.16 (–0.45, 0.12) 0.27
Columbia
Total ΣDAP 82 –10.40 (–124.30, 103.50) 0.86 80 0.07 (–0.52, 0.67) 0.80 79 –0.26 (–0.61, 0.09) 0.14
ΣDEP 82 35.11 (–52.03, 122.26) 0.42 80 0.33 (–0.13, 0.78) 0.15 79 –0.06 (–0.34, 0.21) 0.65
ΣDMP 82 –34.87 (–109.57, 39.84) 0.35 80 –0.16 (–0.55, 0.23) 0.41 79 –0.22 (–0.45, 0.02) 0.07
Mount Sinai
Total ΣDAP 296 –0.65 (–58.07, 56.76) 0.98 294 –0.08 (–0.39, 0.23) 0.63 295 –0.08 (–0.30, 0.14) 0.47
ΣDEP 296 –37.96 (–83.11, 7.18) 0.10 294 –0.06 (–0.31, 0.18) 0.62 295 0.02 (–0.16, 0.19) 0.86
ΣDMP 296 16.21 (–32.73, 65.14) 0.52 294 –0.05 (–0.31, 0.22) 0.71 295 –0.03 (–0.22, 0.16) 0.74
Pooled
Total ΣDAP 1,169 4.47 (–35.56, 44.49) 0.83 1,152 0.00 (–0.21, 0.22) 0.98 1,143 –0.02 (–0.16, 0.11) 0.73
ΣDEP 1,169 1.55 (–31.58, 34.67) 0.93 1,152 0.06 (–0.12, 0.24) 0.53 1,143 0.04 (–0.07, 0.15) 0.46
ΣDMP 1,169 2.96 (–29.66, 35.58) 0.86 1,152 –0.03 (–0.21, 0.15) 0.75 1,143 –0.03 (–0.14, 0.08) 0.59
Abbreviations: ΣDAP, dialkyl phosphate metabolites; ΣDEP, diethyl phosphate metabolites; ΣDMP, dimethyl phosphate metabolites. All urinary metabolites were creatinine-corrected. CHAMACOS and HOME urinary metabolites are the average of two pregnancy measurements. Models were adjusted for center, sex, race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, Hispanic, other), country of origin (USA, other), marital status (married/living as married, not married/living as married), maternal education (< and ≥ high school diploma/equivalent), smoking during pregnancy, parity (nulliparous and multiparous), maternal age at delivery, and gestational age (spline).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Association of 10-fold increase in maternal prenatal urinary total DAP, DMP, and DEP metabolites with infant birth weight (A), length (B), and head circumference (C) in each cohort and in the pooled data set. Models were adjusted for sex, race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, Hispanic, other), country of origin (USA, other), marital status (married/living as married, single), maternal education (< high school, high school graduate), smoking during pregnancy, parity (nulliparous, multiparous), maternal age at delivery, and gestational age (spline). Interaction p-values from Wald tests on cross-product terms.

No statistically significant interaction (α = 0.1) was seen for race/ethnicity (Figure 2), sex (data not shown), or education (data not shown). Although interaction by race/ethnicity was not statistically significant, we present stratified results (Figure 2) for non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, and Hispanic women (women of “other” race/ethnicity were dropped from the analysis due to small numbers) because the HOME study has reported differences in associations of DAP and birth outcome by race/ethnicity. We did find statistically significant interaction for some OP metabolites and PON1 genotypes, so we present results stratified by child (Figure 3) and maternal (see Figure S2) PON1 genotype.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Association of 10-fold increase in maternal prenatal urinary total DAP, DMP, and DEP metabolites with infant birth weight (A), length (B), and head circumference (C) in the pooled data set, stratified by race/ethnicity. Models adjusted for cohort, sex, country of origin (USA, other), marital status (married/living as married, single), maternal education (< high school, high school graduate), smoking during pregnancy, parity (nulliparous, multiparous), maternal age at delivery, and gestational age (spline). Participants of “other” race/ethnicity not included in figure. Interaction p-values from Wald tests on cross-product terms.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Association of 10-fold increase in maternal prenatal urinary total DAP, DMP, and DEP metabolites with infant birth weight, length, and head circumference in the pooled data set, stratified by infant PON–108 genotype (AC) and infant PON192 genotype (DF). Models adjusted for cohort, sex, race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, Hispanic, other), country of origin (USA, other), marital status (married/living as married, single), maternal education (< high school, high school graduate), smoking during pregnancy, parity (nulliparous, multiparous), maternal age at delivery, and gestational age (spline). Interaction p-values from Wald tests on cross-product terms.

In models stratified by race/ethnicity (Figure 2), higher concentrations of total ΣDMP were associated with lower infant weight (β = –66.78 g; 95% CI: –137.46, 3.90) and length (β = –0.40 cm; 95% CI: –0.76, –0.04), and ΣDAP were associated with decreased birth length (β = –0.46 cm; 95% CI: –0.91, –0.01) in non-Hispanic black women. When Hispanic blacks (specifically Dominican women in the Columbia cohort) were classified as black rather than Hispanic in sensitivity analyses, the associations between ΣDMP and birth weight (β = –43.63 g; 95% CI: –97.23, 9.97) and length (β = –0.23 cm; 95% CI: –0.51, 0.06) among blacks persisted but were attenuated, and negative associations were also seen with ΣDMP and head circumference (β = –0.18 cm; 95% CI: –0.37, 0.02), although none of the associations was statistically significant.

The distribution of maternal and child PON1 SNPs differed among the four cohorts (Table 2) and was likely related to the differing racial/ethnic composition of the cohorts since PON1 allele frequencies have been shown to vary by race/ethnicity (Rojas-Garcia et al. 2005). Analyses stratified by infant PON1–108 genotype (Figure 3), revealed nonsignificant negative associations of birth weight (β = –60.53 g; 95% CI: –123.59, 2.53) and ΣDEP and of length and ΣDAP (β = –0.33 cm; 95% CI: –0.72, 0.05), ΣDEP (β = –0.27 cm; 95% CI: –0.60, 0.05), and ΣDMP (β = –0.29 cm; 95% CI: –0.62, 0.02) among infants with the PON1–108CC genotype. In contrast, positive associations of DAPs and birth outcomes were seen among infants with the PON1–108TT genotype, including a statistically significant positive association of ΣDMP and length (β = 0.47 cm; 95% CI: 0.03, 0.91). Interaction terms for genotype × DAPs were statistically significant in the models of ΣDEP on birth weight (p = 0.08) and ΣDAP and ΣDMP on length (p = 0.07 and p = 0.02, respectively). With infant PON1192 genotype, we observed negative associations of length and ΣDAP (β = –0.42 cm; 95% CI: –0.89, 0.04; p interaction = 0.25) and ΣDMP (β = –0.46 cm; 95% CI: –0.86, –0.06; p interaction = 0.14) among the RR group. Positive associations were seen with head circumference and ΣDAP (β = –0.23 cm; 95% CI: –0.02, 0.47; p interaction = 0.05) and ΣDMP (β = –0.15 cm; 95% CI: –0.03, 0.33; p interaction = 0.11) among the heterozygous QR group. No statistically significant associations were seen for DAPs and birth outcome stratifying by maternal PON1 genotype (see Figure S2), except for a positive association of total ΣDEP and head circumference (β = 0.31 cm; 95% CI: 0.07, 0.55; p interaction = 0.13) in mothers with the PON1192QR genotype. Interaction terms for genotype × DAPs were statistically significant in the models of ΣDAP and ΣDMP on head circumference (p = 0.09 for both), again with positive associations seen in the heterozygous PON1192QR genotype, although no associations were statistically significant. Maternal PON1192 genotype was not available for Columbia participants, and no maternal PON1 genotypes were available for HOME participants.

In sensitivity analyses, results did not change substantively when the sample was limited to primiparous women (n = 638) or term births (n = 1,090) or when women with pregnancy complications (n = 103) were included (data not shown). Results were also similar when the DAP concentrations were uncorrected for creatinine, when values < LOD were assigned LOD divided by the square root of 2, and when only one late pregnancy measure of urinary metabolites was used for each woman (data not shown).

Discussion

We found no significant associations between metabolites of OP pesticides and birth weight, length, and head circumference in a pooled data set of > 1,000 pregnant women from four birth cohort studies. Animal studies suggest that OPs may restrict fetal growth, possibly by influencing the adenylyl cyclase signaling cascade, by increasing thyroxine levels, or by effects on placental transport of nutrients (Eskenazi et al. 1999). However, previously published results from these four birth cohorts (Eskenazi et al. 2004; Rauch et al. 2012; Whyatt et al. 2004; Wolff et al. 2007) showed associations between OP exposure and birth outcome that were inconsistent across studies. However, we did observe inverse associations of DAP and DM metabolites with birth length and nonsignificant inverse associations of DM metabolites with birth weight among black women. This is consistent with findings of decreased birth weight with increasing DAP, DE, and DM concentrations among black women in the HOME study (Rauch et al. 2012) and decreased birth weight and length with increasing blood concentrations of chlorpyrifos in African-American and Dominican women in the Columbia study (Whyatt et al. 2004)—although it should be noted that chlorpyrifos devolves to DEP metabolites (Bravo et al. 2002), and the main association seen in blacks in this study was with DMPs.

We hypothesized that we might see inverse associations of urinary OP metabolites with birth outcomes in mothers or children with the more vulnerable PON1–108TT and PON1192QQ genotypes. In the Mount Sinai cohort, DEP metabolites were associated with significantly lower birth weight among mothers with the PON1192QQ genotype (Wolff et al. 2007). In the CHAMACOS study, the inverse associations of DAPs with gestational duration were strongest among infants with PON1–108TT and PON1192QQ genotypes (Harley et al. 2011). However, this pattern was not seen in the HOME cohort, where decrements in birth weight and gestational age associated with DAP were greatest among infants with heterozygous PON1–108CT and PON1192QR genotypes (Rauch et al. 2012). In the pooled analysis, birth weight was negatively associated with total DEPs in infants with the PON1 –108 CC genotype, and birth length was negatively associated with both DAP and DMP metabolites among infants with the PON1 –108 CC and PON1 192 RR genotypes, rather than the less active PON1 –108 TT and PON1 192 QQ genotypes, as hypothesized. We found limited interaction of DAPs with maternal PON1 genotype, and the patterns of association did not support stronger negative associations among women with the more susceptible genotypes, even though maternal genotype might be hypothesized to be the more powerful determinant of susceptibility than infant genotype given that mothers have approximately four times the paraoxonase enzyme as newborns and have a 50% overlap with infant genotype (Holland et al. 2006). We had fewer observations for the maternal genotype analysis because HOME study participants did not have maternal genotype data for either SNP, and Columbia study participants had data for only one; however, there was little or no evidence of consistent patterns of association, as might be expected if the only issue was reduced precision. Thus, it is possible that the patterns with infant genotype were attributable to chance. An additional issue is that PON1 allele frequencies vary by race/ethnicity, as can be seen in the different SNP distributions across cohorts. Because race/ethnicity is associated with birth outcome and PON1 genotype and may also be associated with OP exposure, confounding by race/ethnicity is a possibility. Although we controlled for race/ethnicity in the models, there is considerable genetic variability within race/ethnicity categories (perhaps especially among the Hispanic category, which included women of Mexican, Puerto Rican, and Dominican origin), suggesting that we cannot completely discount the possibility of residual confounding.

In addition to racial and ethnic differences, the cohorts also varied in sources and routes of OP pesticide exposures, including food, home pesticide use, and agricultural drift or take-home exposure. Thus, urinary DAP concentrations may reflect different exposures in each cohort, limiting their interpretation in the pooled data set. In the farmworker CHAMACOS population, urinary DAPs likely represented a combination of agricultural, residential, and dietary exposure, a different mix of pesticides than would be experienced by the low-income, urban Columbia and Mount Sinai populations who were presumably exposed only through residential and dietary routes, or the more affluent HOME study participants who were enrolled after the residential ban and likely exposed mainly through diet. The HOME participants had relatively high DAP levels considering that their exposure was mainly dietary, suggesting that they may have had higher fruit and vegetable consumption, a very different route of exposure than women who may be exposed from home pesticide use.

Not all of the six urinary DAPs were equally detected. The proportion of women with values below the detection limit in the pooled sample ranged from 9% for DMTP to 78% for DEDTP. Individual OPs do not necessarily devolve to all three DE or DM metabolites—for example, malathion devolves to DMP, DMTP (dimethylthiophosphate), and DMDTP (dimethyldithiophosphate), whereas oxydemeton-methyl devolves only to DMP and DMTP (Bravo et al. 2002)—and it is expected that certain metabolites have lower detection frequencies than others. For this reason, we examined ΣDEP and ΣDMP metabolites to obtain comprehensive estimates of exposure to all DE- and DM-devolving OP pesticides. However, the large number of women with concentrations < LOD for some metabolites may have resulted in minor misclassification at the very lowest exposure levels. Misclassification of these minimal exposures would not be expected to seriously bias the exposure–response estimation across the full range of exposure.

Although urinary DAPs are a useful biomarker of OP pesticide exposure, they have limitations. OPs have short half-lives in the body and show considerable intra-individual variability over time; thus, urinary DAPs represent short-term rather than ongoing exposure. DAPs are nonspecific metabolites, and not all pesticides that devolve to the same metabolite are equally toxic; for example, both oxydemeton-methyl and malathion devolve to DMP metabolites, but the former is much more toxic (U.S. EPA 2002). Although we can determine whether the parent pesticide was from the DEP or DMP class, we cannot determine the mix of actual pesticide parent compounds to which the mother was exposed. Thus, we cannot examine how the toxicity of the pesticide mixture differed across cohorts. Additionally, OPs can break down to DAPs in the environment as well as in the body, so DAP concentrations in urine reflect a mixture of exposure to toxic parent compounds and nontoxic preformed DAPs in dust and food (Quirós-Alcalá et al. 2012). The proportion of preformed DAPs may be greater in populations receiving their exposure predominantly from food, where the parent pesticide has had more time to break down into DAPs before consumption. Finally, although DAP concentrations were all measured in the same laboratory using the same analytical methods, samples were stored for different amounts of time and analysis took place in different years. Thus, we cannot rule out the possibility of storage or batch effects, suggesting that, although rank order of DAP concentrations is internally consistent within cohort, rank may not be accurate when DAP concentrations measured in different batches (i.e. cohorts) are pooled together.

One strength of this study is its large sample size, which allows for better examination of race/ethnicity and genetic variability than in the more homogenous, individual cohorts. Methodologies were similar between cohorts and tests of interaction by cohort failed to reject the hypothesis of homogeneity by cohort. Analyses in our pooled cohort confirmed earlier findings of associations of OP exposure (as measured by DAPs in urine and chlorpyrifos in blood) with decreased birth weight in non-Hispanic black women, but not in whites or Hispanics (Rauch et al. 2012; Whyatt et al. 2004). In general, non-Hispanic black women had a wider range and more variability in birth weight, which may explain why an association was seen in this group.

Overall, this study does not support associations of OP pesticide exposure during pregnancy with decreased weight, length, or head circumference at birth, except in black women and possibly infants with the PON1–108CC and PON1192RR genotypes. However, this study also illustrates the limitations of pooling data when the population demographics and exposure patterns for biomarkers of exposure with a short half-life differ across cohorts. Although pooling data from multiple cohorts is tempting, careful consideration must be given to the interpretation of the exposure measures in each cohort and whether rank order is maintained and remains meaningful across the pooled cohort. In some cases, individual cohort studies with homogeneous populations may be preferable to pooled data.

Editor’s Note: In the Advance Publication, the symbols in the figure legends for Figures 2 and 3 were incorrect. In the Figure 2A–C legends, the correct symbols are triangles to indicate “Non-Hispanic Black” and circles to indicate “Hispanic.” In the Figure 3A–C legends, the correct symbols are triangles to indicate “CT” and circles to indicate “CC.” In the Figure 3D–F legends, the correct symbols are triangles to indicate “QR” and circles to indicate “RR.” The correct figure legends are included in this article.

Supplemental Material

(749 KB) PDF

Footnotes

This publication was supported by grants from the National Institute for Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS: 5P01ES009600, R01ES008977, 5R01ES11158, 5R01ES012468, 5R01ES10165, R01ESO12503, 1P01ES11261, 5R01ES014575, 1R01ES015517, P01ES09584, P30ESO1896, 2P01ES09605-06, 2PO1ES09601, R01ES09883, P30ES023515, and P60MD00222), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA: R827027, 82860901, RD832141, R827039, R82670901-5, RD83170901, RD834509, and R826886), the New York Community Trust, and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Association of Teachers of Preventive Medicine.

The contents of this paper are solely the responsibility of the grantees and do not necessarily represent the official views of the funders. Further, the U.S. EPA does not endorse the purchase of any commercial products or services mentioned in the publication.

A.B. has served as a consultant on cases unrelated to the issues covered in this paper and has participated as a member of the Board for The Organic Center, a non-profit organization that provides information for scientific research about organic food and farming. The other authors declare they have no actual or potential competing financial interests.

References

  1. Barr DB, Ananth CV, Yan X, Lashley S, Smulian JC, Ledoux TA, et al. Pesticide concentrations in maternal and umbilical cord sera and their relation to birth outcomes in a population of pregnant women and newborns in New Jersey. Sci Total Environ. 2010;408(4):790–795. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Berkowitz GS, Wetmur JG, Birman-Deych E, Obel J, Lapinski RH, Godbold JH, et al. 2004. In utero pesticide exposure, maternal paraoxonase activity, and head circumference. Environ Health Perspect 112 388 391, doi: 10.1289/ehp.6414 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bouchard MF, Chevrier J, Harley KG, Kogut K, Vedar M, Calderon N, et al. 2011. Prenatal exposure to organophosphate pesticides and IQ in 7-year-old children. Environ Health Perspect 119 1189 1195, doi: 10.1289/ehp.1003185 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bravo R, Driskell WJ, Whitehead RD, Jr, Needham LL, Barr DB. Quantitation of dialkyl phosphate metabolites of organophosphate pesticides in human urine using GC-MS-MS with isotopic internal standards. J Anal Toxicol. 2002;26(5):245–252. doi: 10.1093/jat/26.5.245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Breslin WJ, Liberacki AB, Dittenber DA, Quast JF. Evaluation of the developmental and reproductive toxicity of chlorpyrifos in the rat. Fundam Appl Toxicol. 1996;29(1):119–130. doi: 10.1006/faat.1996.0013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chen J, Kumar M, Chan W, Berkowitz G, Wetmur JG. 2003. Increased influence of genetic variation on PON1 activity in neonates. Environ Health Perspect 111 1403 1409, doi: 10.1289/ehp.6105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Costa LG, Cole TB, Jansen KL, Furlong CE. In: The Paraoxonases: Their Role in Disease Development and Xenobiotic Metabolism (Mackness B, Mackness M, Aviram M, Paragh G, eds) Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer; 2008. Paraoxonase (PON1) and organophosphate toxicity. pp. 209–220. [Google Scholar]
  8. Costa LG, Richter RJ, Li WF, Cole T, Guizzetti M, Furlong CE. Paraoxonase (PON 1) as a biomarker of susceptibility for organophosphate toxicity. Biomarkers. 2003;8(1):1–12. doi: 10.1080/13547500210148315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Engel SM, Wetmur J, Chen J, Zhu C, Barr DB, Canfield RL, et al. 2011. Prenatal exposure to organophosphates, paraoxonase 1, and cognitive development in childhood. Environ Health Perspect 119 1182 1188, doi: 10.1289/ehp.1003183 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Eskenazi B, Bradman A, Castorina R. Exposures of children to organophosphate pesticides and their potential adverse health effects. Environ Health Perspect. 1999;107(suppl 3):409–419. doi: 10.1289/ehp.99107s3409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Eskenazi B, Harley K, Bradman A, Weltzien E, Jewell NP, Barr DB, et al. 2004. Association of in utero organophosphate pesticide exposure and fetal growth and length of gestation in an agricultural population. Environ Health Perspect 112 1116 1124, doi: 10.1289/ehp.6789 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Grube A, Donaldson D, Kiely T, Wu L. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 2011. Pesticides Industry Sales and Usage: 2006 and 2007 Market Estimates. Available: http://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-10/documents/market_estimates2007.pdf [accessed 27 March 2015] [Google Scholar]
  13. Harley KG, Huen K, Aguilar Schall R, Holland NT, Bradman A, Barr DB, et al. 2011. Association of organophosphate pesticide exposure and paraoxonase with birth outcome in Mexican-American women. PloS One 6 8 e23923, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023923 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Holland N, Furlong C, Bastaki M, Richter R, Bradman A, Huen K, et al. 2006. Paraoxonase polymorphisms, haplotypes, and enzyme activity in Latino mothers and newborns. Environ Health Perspect 114 985 991, doi: 10.1289/ehp.8540 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lubin JH, Colt JS, Camann D, Davis S, Cerhan JR, Severson RK, et al. 2004. Epidemiologic evaluation of measurement data in the presence of detection limits. Environ Health Perspect 112 1691 1696, doi: 10.1289/ehp.7199 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Perera FP, Rauh V, Tsai WY, Kinney P, Camann D, Barr D, et al. 2003. Effects of transplacental exposure to environmental pollutants on birth outcomes in a multiethnic population. Environ Health Perspect 111 201 205, doi: 10.1289/ehp.5742 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Qiao D, Seidler FJ, Padilla S, Slotkin TA. Developmental neurotoxicity of chlorpyrifos: what is the vulnerable period? Environ Health Perspect. 2002;110:1097–1103. doi: 10.1289/ehp.021101097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Quirós-Alcalá L, Bradman A, Smith K, Weerasekera G, Odetokun M, Barr DB, et al. Organophosphorous pesticide breakdown products in house dust and children’s urine. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2012;22(6):559–568. doi: 10.1038/jes.2012.46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Rauch SA, Braun JM, Barr DB, Calafat AM, Khoury J, Montesano AM, et al. 2012. Associations of prenatal exposure to organophosphate pesticide metabolites with gestational age and birth weight. Environ Health Perspect 120 1055 1060, doi: 10.1289/ehp.1104615 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Rauh V, Arunajadai S, Horton M, Perera F, Hoepner L, Barr DB, et al. 2011. Seven-year neurodevelopmental scores and prenatal exposure to chlorpyrifos, a common agricultural pesticide. Environ Health Perspect 119 1196 1201, doi: 10.1289/ehp.1003160 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Rojas-Garcia AE, Solís-Heredia MJ, Piña-Guzmán B, Vega L, López-Carrillo L, Quintanilla-Vega B. Genetic polymorphisms and activity of PON1 in a Mexican population. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2005;205(3):282–289. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2004.10.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Spyker JM, Avery DL. Neurobehavioral effects of prenatal exposure to the organophosphate Diazinon in mice. J Toxicol Environ Health. 1977;3(5–6):989–1002. doi: 10.1080/15287397709529633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Srivastava MK, Raizada RB. Development effect of technical dimethoate in rats: maternal and fetal toxicity evaluation. Indian J Exp Biol. 1996;34(4):329–333. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. U.S. EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency) Diazinon revised risk assessment and agreement with registrants. Fed Reg. 2001;69:48864–48867. [Google Scholar]
  25. U.S. EPA. Washington, DC: U.S. EPA, Office of Pesticide Programs; 2002. Revised OP (Organophosphate) Cumulative Risk Assessment. [Google Scholar]
  26. Wang P, Tian Y, Wang XJ, Gao Y, Shi R, Wang GQ, et al. Organophosphate pesticide exposure and perinatal outcomes in Shanghai, China. Environ Int. 2012;42:100–104. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2011.04.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Whyatt RM, Rauh V, Barr DB, Camann DE, Andrews HF, Garfinkel R, et al. 2004. Prenatal insecticide exposures and birth weight and length among an urban minority cohort. Environ Health Perspect 112 1125 1132, doi: 10.1289/ehp.6641 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Wolff MS, Engel S, Berkowitz G, Teitelbaum S, Siskind J, Barr DB, et al. Prenatal pesticide and PCB exposures and birth outcomes. Pediatr Res. 2007;61(2):243–250. doi: 10.1203/pdr.0b013e31802d77f0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

(749 KB) PDF

Articles from Environmental Health Perspectives are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

RESOURCES