Abstract
Recent evidence suggests that sexual contact may give rise to transmission of Ebola virus long after infection has been cleared from blood. We develop a simple mathematical model that incorporates contact transmission and sexual transmission parametrized from data relating to the 2013–2015 West African Ebola epidemic. The model explores scenarios where contact transmission is reduced following infection events, capturing behaviour change, and quantifies how these actions reducing transmission may be compromised by sexual transmission in terms of increasing likelihood, size and duration of outbreaks. We characterize the extent to which sexual transmission operates in terms of the probability of initial infection resolving to sexual infectiousness and the sexual transmission rate, and relate these parameters to the overall case burden. We find that sexual transmission can have large effects on epidemic dynamics (increasing attack ratios from 25% in scenarios without sexual transmission but with contact-transmission-reducing behaviour, up to 80% in equivalent scenarios with sexual transmission).
Keywords: Ebola virus, sexual transmission, mathematical model, epidemic, population dynamics
1. Introduction
The recent Ebola virus outbreak in West Africa posed a global threat and came at significant morbidity (approx. 30 000 cases) and mortality costs (case fatality rate 40–70%) [1,2]. Owing to the rapid and concerted local and international intervention, focused on breaking the chain of direct transmission, the epidemic was eventually brought under control. Recent evidence suggests that the virus can persist in semen for several months [3] and genomic evidence has identified at least one instance of sexual transmission from male to female [4]. Here, we use a mathematical model to study the extent to which sexual transmission may compromise interventions and seed future epidemics. Our model comprised both direct-contact and sexual transmission modes, parametrized using recent data on Ebola virus transmission and shedding in semen. Uncertain parameters, such as the probability of becoming sexually infectious, are varied through plausible ranges and metrics of epidemic impact; specifically increase in outbreak size, duration and probability are attributed to the degree to which sexual transmission is assumed to be in operation. We find that sexual transmission can dramatically affect the course of the outbreak and that the probability of becoming sexually infectious is a key parameter determining outbreak size.
2. Model and analysis
To parametrize the dynamics of the sexually infectious class, we used recently published data from a convenience survey of men who recovered from Ebola virus infection during the 2013–2015 epidemic [3], which suggested that virus can remain present in the semen for a considerable time (figure 1).
The four-month lag before the probability of virus detection in semen drops below 100% suggests a gamma distribution rather than an exponential distribution to describe the probability of remaining sexually infectious over time. Accordingly, we fitted the gamma probability density function
2.1 |
to the data using maximum likelihood (details in the electronic supplementary material).
We used the method of stages [5] to produce a gamma distributed residence time in the sexually infectious class, with mean duration and corresponding recovery rate . After fitting the model, we recast α to its nearest integer and refitted η. The results of the fitting exercise show that the optimal model contains α = 5 sexually infectious pseudo-stages with a pseudo-stage transition rate of 0.722 months−1 (alternative plausible parametrizations, α = 4,6, are explored in the electronic supplementary material).
We developed a Susceptible-Infectious-Sexually Infectious-Recovered (SIYR) model to describe the dynamics of the epidemic in a population of size . Susceptible individuals (S) may transition to the symptomatic infectious state (I) via two modes of virus transmission: direct- or sexual contact with infectious (I and Y, respectively) individuals. The parameter βC is the transmission rate for infection that occurs through density-dependent direct-contact, which is scaled by the function . Here acts to reduce direct-contact transmission when the number of cases is high, reflecting behaviour and intervention changes that reduce transmission (one of several ways to model outbreaks brought under control). The parameter βS is the transmission rate of the virus that occurs through frequency-dependent sexual contact. Individuals transition out of the directly infectious class at rate γ, or die due to infection with probability ψ. After transitioning from class I, a proportion of individuals (p) become sexually infectious and transition through the five equally infectious pseudo-stages, with pseudo-stage transition rate η. Individuals who transition from the last pseudo-stage (Y5) or did not become sexually infectious are then recovered (R) and are immune to reinfection.
2.2 |
Using the next generation matrix method [6], the basic reproductive ratio of virus in the system is
2.3 |
i.e. the sum of the basic reproductive ratios associated with contact transmission, , and sexual transmission, . We set to 2.0, consistent with data-derived estimates, which include the common assumption of a two week infectious period [7]. Parameter ϕ was determined by selecting an attack ratio of 25% in the absence of sexual transmission (assuming that an Ebola outbreak may affect as many as one in four individuals even with behaviour change; electronic supplementary material). Without such behaviour change (ϕ = 0) attack ratios are typically 80% in this model. Parameter values are listed in table 1.
Table 1.
description | value | |
---|---|---|
N | total population size | 1000 |
γ | mean recovery rate from symptomatic infection | 2 |
ϕ | degree of intervention to current incidence | 0.054 |
βC | transmission rate through direct-contact | 0.01334 |
α | scaling parameter of gamma distribution/number of sexually infectious pseudo-stages | 5 |
η | rate parameter of gamma distribution/pseudo-stage transition rate | 0.722 |
ω | mean recovery rate from sexually infectious phase (η/α) | 0.144 |
p | proportion of directly infectious individuals who become sexually infectious | 0.0–0.5 |
βS | transmission rate through sexual contact | 0.0–0.5 |
ψ | probability of disease-induced mortality | 0.7 |
Because some parameters relating to sexual transmission (p, βS) are uncertain, these were varied through plausible ranges: , with maximum values increasing overall R0 up to 2.5. Baseline epidemic metrics (probability, size and duration) in the absence of sexual transmission are discerned by including in simulations. Models were implemented as stochastic simulations using Gillespie's direct method [8] to link parameter values with increases in average outbreak size, average duration of the outbreak and the probability of an outbreak. Replication was at the scale of 1000 outbreaks per parameter set and each simulation began with one symptomatically infectious individual (I0 = 1), with all other individuals assumed susceptible. Simulations ran until there were no infectious individuals (I = Y = 0).
Probability of large outbreaks was established by seeking the relative size of the second, large mode for outbreak sizes from the appropriate histogram [9]. For each parameter set a histogram of the size of outbreaks was generated (breaks occurring at every 50 individuals). All sets exhibited a U-shaped distribution, from which we found the outbreak size that separated the two modes of the distribution (local minimum of the distribution function). Additionally, extinction time (time until last infectious individual, I or Y, recovers) and size were calculated only from the set of large outbreaks (i.e. conditional on a large outbreak occurring).
3. Results
The average outbreak size, extinction time and outbreak probability increased with sexual transmission rate, βS, and the proportion of individuals that become sexually infectious, p (figure 2). When there is no sexual transmission (), outbreak size and outbreak probability are at their minimum. Extinction time is shortest for p = 0, and only longer for βS = 0, p > 0 because individuals can enter the sexually infectious phase (Y) without transmitting, and extinction time is measured as the time they recover from class Y.
The three panels A, B, and C in figure 2 are example outbreaks that occur with each denoted parameter pairing. When both βS and p are small (A), outbreaks that occur have lower sizes and happen over a shorter time. Intermediate values of βS and p (B), result in slightly longer outbreak duration with larger sizes. With the largest values of βS and p (C), the outbreaks have similar duration to those associated with (B) and have the largest outbreak sizes. In each example, the direct-contact chain breaks (red curves showing incidence of symptomatic cases at 0) and is rescued by sexually infectious individuals.
4. Discussion
Adding sexual transmission to a direct-transmission compartment model increases parasite fitness by augmenting the possible ways in which the parasite may achieve onward transmission. The parasite basic reproductive ratio is the sum of the direct and sexual transmission basic reproductive ratios, similar to the sum of direct and environmental transmission ratios derived for avian influenza viruses [10] and waterborne pathogens [11]. The degree to which sexual transmission compromises mitigation of an outbreak that is waning due to behaviour change reducing direct-contact transmission depends on the probability that regular infections resolve to a sexually infectious state, the duration of that state and the sexual transmission rate. The inclusion of sexual transmission increases the probability of outbreaks occurring partly by repairing broken transmission chains, which augments the reproductive ratio used in the stochastic threshold theorem for epidemic probability derived using a birth–death model [12].
The study explores the possibility that Ebola virus outbreaks could be reignited by sexual transmission post-convalescence. Our model provides a way to evaluate the extent to which this transmission mode may increase outbreak size and duration, as well as its ability to repair broken, or stuttering, direct-transmission chains. The probability that individuals become sexually infectious is key to this process and is a relatively unknown parameter. The ongoing advice and counselling to Ebola survivors aimed at preventing sexual transmission [13], when translated to a reduced probability of being sexually infectious, could have a striking impact even if it is hard to measure in practice. The aim of the model presented is to provide a timely, broad perspective on the potential role of sexual transmission and an appreciation of which controllable parameters have the largest effect on outbreaks. Available data [3] were invaluable in enabling the model to describe non-exponentially distributed residence times in the sexually infectious class. Future data sources are likely to further improve on basic compartment models, such as data on the disproportionate role that individuals may play based on partner exchange rates [14], and the network structure of sexual contacts [15]. These enhancements may ultimately refine predictions on the role of sexual transmission in otherwise direct-contact contagious processes like Ebola.
Supplementary Material
Data accessibility
The research uses only previously published data. Details of certain methods are explained in the electronic supplementary material.
Authors' contributions
J.E.V., J.M.D., P.R. and A.W.P. participated in the design of the study and drafted the manuscript; J.E.V and A.W.P. performed the mathematical analysis and numerical simulation; all authors gave final approval for publication and agree to be held accountable for the content therein.
Competing interests
We declare we have no competing interests.
Funding
We acknowledge funding from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under Award number U01GM110744 and funding from the National Science Foundation under Rapid Award number 1515194.
References
- 1.Agua-Agum J, et al. 2015. West African Ebola epidemic after one year–slowing but not yet under control. N. Engl. J. Med. 372, 584–587. ( 10.1056/NEJMc1414992) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Rougeron V, Feldmann H, Grard G, Becker S, Leroy EM. 2015. Ebola and Marburg haemorrhagic fever. J. Clin. Virol. 64, 111–119. ( 10.1016/j.jcv.2015.01.014) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Deen GF, et al. 2015. Ebola RNA persistence in semen of Ebola virus disease survivors—preliminary report. N. Engl. J. Med. ( 10.1056/NEJMoa1511410) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mate SE, et al. 2015. Molecular evidence of sexual transmission of Ebola virus. N. Engl. J. Med. 373, 2448–2454. ( 10.1056/NEJMoa1509773) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wearing HJ, Rohani P, Keeling MJ. 2005. Appropriate models for the management of infectious diseases. PLoS Med. 2, e174 ( 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020174) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Diekmann O, Heesterbeek H, Britton T. 2013. Mathematical tools for understanding infectious disease dynamics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar]
- 7.King AA, Domenech de Cellès M, Magpantay FMG, Rohani P. 2015. Avoidable errors in the modelling of outbreaks of emerging pathogens, with special reference to Ebola. Proc. R. Soc. B 282, 20150347 ( 10.1098/rspb.2015.0347) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Keeling MJ, Rohani P. 2008. Modeling infectious diseases in humans and animals. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Nåsell I. 2008. The threshold concept in deterministic and stochastic models. In Epidemic models: their structure and relation to data (ed. Mollison D.), p. 444 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Rohani P, Breban R, Stallknecht DE, Drake JM. 2009. Environmental transmission of low pathogenicity avian influenza viruses and its implications for pathogen invasion. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 10 365–10 369. ( 10.1073/Pnas.0809026106) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Tien JH, Earn DJD. 2010. Multiple transmission pathways and disease dynamics in a waterborne pathogen model. Bull. Math. Biol. 72, 1506–1533. ( 10.1007/s11538-010-9507-6) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Renshaw E. 1993. Modelling biological populations in space and time. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Christie A, et al. 2015. Possible sexual transmission of Ebola virus—Liberia, 2015. Morb. Mortal. Wkly Rep. 64, 479–481. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.May RM, Anderson RM. 1987. Transmission dynamics of HIV infection. Nature 326, 137–142. ( 10.1038/326137a0) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Keeling MJ, Eames KTD. 2005. Networks and epidemic models. J. R. Soc. Interface 2, 295–307. ( 10.1098/rsif.2005.0051) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The research uses only previously published data. Details of certain methods are explained in the electronic supplementary material.