Abstract
An analytical study of 59 patients who underwent the posterior operation for cervical spondylosis with myelopathy at the London Hospital between 1945 and 1960 has been made. The postoperative period of observation ranged from five to 20 years with an average of 10 years. Initially 36 patients were improved by the operation, 24 considerably so, and in 15 patients further deterioration was prevented. Five years after operation 33 patients were still improved and in five patients co-existent disease had become apparent. Ten years after operation 30 patients had maintained their initial improvement; progression of the disease accounted for a drop of 10% in the success rate initially achieved. No patient in this series developed postoperative instability of the cervical spine. Patients with less than two years' duration of symptoms and with less neurological disability fared better. The importance of a long follow-up period for the proper assessment of results is thus emphasized. It is suggested that the posterior operation has stood the test of time and will continue to maintain a useful place in the treatment of this condition. Some points are outlined for the successful practice of this operation.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- ALLEN K. L. Neuropathies caused by bony spurs in the cervical spine with special reference to surgical treatment. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1952 Feb;15(1):20–36. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.15.1.20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- BRADSHAW P. Some aspects of cervical spondylosis. Q J Med. 1957 Apr;26(102):177–208. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- BRAIN W. R., NORTHFIELD D., WILKINSON M. The neurological manifestations of cervical spondylosis. Brain. 1952 Jun;75(2):187–225. doi: 10.1093/brain/75.2.187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- CAMPBELL A. M., PHILLIPS D. G. Cervical disk lesions with neurological disorder. Differential diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis. Br Med J. 1960 Aug 13;2(5197):481–485. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5197.481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- CLOWARD R. B. The anterior approach for removal of ruptured cervical disks. J Neurosurg. 1958 Nov;15(6):602–617. doi: 10.3171/jns.1958.15.6.0602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Crandall P. H., Batzdorf U. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neurosurg. 1966 Jul;25(1):57–66. doi: 10.3171/jns.1966.25.1.0057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- HAFT H., SHENKIN H. A. SURGICAL END RESULTS OF CERVICAL RIDGE AND DISK PROBLEMS. JAMA. 1963 Oct 26;186:312–315. doi: 10.1001/jama.1963.03710040038007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- LEES F., TURNER J. W. NATURAL HISTORY AND PROGNOSIS OF CERVICAL SPONDYLOSIS. Br Med J. 1963 Dec 28;2(5373):1607–1610. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5373.1607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- NORTHFIELD D. W. Diagnosis and treatment of myelopathy due to cervical spondylosis. Br Med J. 1955 Dec 17;2(4954):1474–1477. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.4954.1474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- ROGERS L. The treatment of cervical spondylitic myelopathy by mobilisation of the cervical cord into an enlarged spinal canal. J Neurosurg. 1961 Jul;18:490–492. doi: 10.3171/jns.1961.18.4.0490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- STOOPS W. L., KING R. B. CHRONIC MYELOPATHY ASSOCIATED WITH CERVICAL SPONDYLOSIS: ITS RESPONSE TO LAMINECTOMY AND FORAMENOTOMY. JAMA. 1965 Apr 26;192:281–284. doi: 10.1001/jama.1965.03080170009002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]