Skip to main content
NCBI home page
G3: Genes | Genomes | Genetics logoLink to G3: Genes | Genomes | Genetics
. 2016 May 17;6(7):2173–2179. doi: 10.1534/g3.116.029009

Construction and Annotation of a High Density SNP Linkage Map of the Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar) Genome

Hsin Y Tsai *,1, Diego Robledo *,†,1, Natalie R Lowe *, Michael Bekaert ‡, John B Taggart ‡, James E Bron ‡,1, Ross D Houston *,2
PMCID: PMC4938670  PMID: 27194803

Abstract

High density linkage maps are useful tools for fine-scale mapping of quantitative trait loci, and characterization of the recombination landscape of a species’ genome. Genomic resources for Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) include a well-assembled reference genome, and high density single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays. Our aim was to create a high density linkage map, and to align it with the reference genome assembly. Over 96,000 SNPs were mapped and ordered on the 29 salmon linkage groups using a pedigreed population comprising 622 fish from 60 nuclear families, all genotyped with the ‘ssalar01’ high density SNP array. The number of SNPs per group showed a high positive correlation with physical chromosome length (r = 0.95). While the order of markers on the genetic and physical maps was generally consistent, areas of discrepancy were identified. Approximately 6.5% of the previously unmapped reference genome sequence was assigned to chromosomes using the linkage map. Male recombination rate was lower than females across the vast majority of the genome, but with a notable peak in subtelomeric regions. Finally, using RNA-Seq data to annotate the reference genome, the mapped SNPs were categorized according to their predicted function, including annotation of ∼2500 putative nonsynonymous variants. The highest density SNP linkage map for any salmonid species has been created, annotated, and integrated with the Atlantic salmon reference genome assembly. This map highlights the marked heterochiasmy of salmon, and provides a useful resource for salmonid genetics and genomics research.

Keywords: Salmo salar, linkage map, SNP array, recombination, RNA-Seq

Linkage maps are valuable tools for the investigation of the genetic basis of complex traits in farmed animal species. For several decades, linkage maps have enabled the mapping of quantitative trait loci (QTL), and formed the basis of attempts at positional cloning of these QTL in both terrestrial (Goddard and Hayes 2009) and aquatic farmed species (Danzmann and Gharbi 2001). High throughput sequencing technologies have now expedited the discovery of millions of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers (Liu 2010). These SNPs form the basis of modern, high-resolution genetics studies, and underpin genomic selection for faster genetic improvement in terrestrial livestock, and, laterally, aquaculture breeding programs (Meuwissen et al. 2001; Goddard et al. 2010; Sonesson 2010; Yáñez et al. 2014, 2015). Scoring of genome-wide SNPs in large populations is achieved either through genotyping by sequencing (Davey et al. 2011), or by creation and application of SNP arrays (e.g., Houston et al. 2014a; Yáñez et al. 2016). High density linkage maps based on these SNP datasets can aid in high resolution mapping of loci underpinning complex traits in farmed animals (e.g., Shi et al. 2014; Wang et al. 2015), improvements in assembly of reference sequences (Fierst 2015), and knowledge of the recombination landscape of the genome (e.g., Groenen et al. 2009; Tortereau et al. 2012).

Reference genome assemblies are now available for several aquaculture species, including Atlantic salmon (Davidson et al. 2010; Lien et al. 2016). Once anchored and annotated, these genome assemblies provide invaluable physical maps of the genome. Due to a recent whole genome duplication, and the relatively high frequency of long and diverse repeat elements (de Boer et al. 2007; Davidson et al. 2010; Lien et al. 2016), assembly of the Atlantic salmon genome has been challenging, with ∼22% of the current assembly (NCBI GCA_000233375.4) yet to be assigned to chromosome. Salmonid species exhibit marked heterochiasmy, with males showing very low recombination rates across much of the genome, but with much higher recombination rates thought to occur in telomeric regions (e.g., Sakamoto et al. 2000; Lien et al. 2011; Miller et al. 2011; Brieuc et al. 2014; Gonen et al. 2014). This phenomenon may be related to the pairing and recombination between homeologous regions of the genome, particularly in males (Wright et al. 1983; Allendorf and Thorgaard 1984; Allendorf et al. 2015). Several high density SNP arrays exist for Atlantic salmon (Houston et al. 2014a; Yáñez et al. 2016), and integrated linkage maps based on those arrays would facilitate detailed interrogation of the unusual recombination landscape. Further, while the high density SNP arrays have been applied for genome-wide association study (GWAS) and genomic prediction (Ødegård et al. 2014; Correa et al. 2015; Tsai et al. 2015; Tsai et al. 2016), such studies would be enhanced by annotation of the SNPs according to their genomic position, nearby genes, and their predicted effects.

Therefore, the purposes of this study were: (i) to construct a linkage map of the SNPs contained on the publicly available high density Affymetrix Atlantic salmon SNP array ‘ssalar01’ (Houston et al. 2014); (ii) to align and compare the linkage map to the latest Atlantic salmon reference genome assembly (GenBank assembly accession GCA_000233375.4); (iii) to assign previously unmapped reference genome contigs and genes to chromosomes; (iv) to investigate and compare patterns of male and female recombination across the genome; and (v) to annotate the SNPs according to their position relative to putative genes, including prediction of variant effects.

Materials and Methods

Animals

The population used for the linkage analysis was a subset of those described in Gharbi et al. (2015), purchased from Landcatch Natural Selection (LNS, Ormsary, UK). The juvenile fish used in the current study were from the 2007 year group of the LNS broodstock, and were from 60 full sibling families (28 sires and 60 dams) comprising at least six progeny per family. The trial (which focused on resistance to sea lice) was performed by Marine Environmental Research Laboratory (Machrihanish, UK), and under approval of ethics review committee in the University of Stirling (UK). Full details of the trial, and the population used, have been described previously (Houston et al. 2014b; Gharbi et al. 2015; Tsai et al. 2015, 2016).

SNP array genotyping

Genomic DNA from each sample was extracted (Qiagen, Crawley, UK), and genotyped for the ‘ssalar01’ Affymetrix Axiom SNP array containing ∼132,000 validated SNPs. Details of the creation and testing of the SNP array are given in Houston et al. (2014a). Details of the quality control filtering of the genotypes are given in Tsai et al. (2015). Briefly, the Plink software was used to filter the validated SNPs by removing individuals and SNPs with excessive (> 1%) Mendelian errors, and SNPs with minor allele frequency (MAF) < 0.05 in this dataset. In total, 111,908 SNPs were retained for 622 fish (534 offspring, 28 sires, and 60 dams). Details of all the SNP markers are available at dbSNP ​(Sherry et al. 2001) (NCBI ss# 947429275–947844429.)

Linkage analysis

Lep-Map2 (Rastas et al. 2016) was used to construct the linkage maps. The ‘Filtering’ function was applied to the initial input dataset, with ‘MAFLimit’ set at 0.05 (consistent with filtering described above), and ‘dataTolerance’ set at 0.001 to remove markers exhibiting significant segregation distortion. The ‘SeparateChromosomes’ function was applied to cluster markers into linkage groups, with the LOD threshold of 36 applied (chosen because this is the level at which 29 groups were formed, consistent with the expected karyotype of European Atlantic salmon). The function ‘JoinSingles’ was applied to assign additional single SNPs to existing linkage groups. Subsequently, the function ‘OrderMarkers’ was applied to estimate the marker order within each linkage group. Using parallelized computing, this step was repeated several times to assess consistency of marker order between replicates. Sex-specific linkage maps were generated because of the known difference in recombination rate between male and female Atlantic salmon (Gilbey et al. 2004; Moen et al. 2004; Lien et al. 2011; Gonen et al. 2014). To compare the genetic and physical maps, the flanking sequence for each SNP locus (35 bp either side) was aligned with the Atlantic salmon reference genome assembly (GenBank assembly GCA_000233375.4) (Davidson et al. 2010), and only complete and exact matches to the reference genome (e-value = 3 × 10−29) were retained. In cases where the SNP flanking sequence aligned exactly with > 1 genomic region, the alignment corresponding to the chromosome that was consistent with the linkage mapping of the SNP was retained.

RNA sequencing

Atlantic salmon fry samples from two different families from the Scottish breeding nucleus of Landcatch Natural Selection Ltd were selected for RNA sequencing, corresponding to families ‘B’ and ‘S’ in Houston et al. (2010). Full details of the library preparation and sequencing are given in Houston et al. (2014a) (although for the current study, only two of the three families previously sequenced were used for assembling the transcriptome. This was because the third family, ‘C’, had large variation in sequence coverage between samples). Briefly, a total of 48 individual fry were homogenized in 5 ml TRI Reagent (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) using a Polytron mechanical homogenizer (Kinemetica, Switzerland). The RNA was isolated from 1 ml of the homogenate, using 0.5 vol of RNA precipitation solution (1.2 mol/l sodium chloride; 0.8 mol/l sodium citrate sesquihydrate), and 0.5 vol isopropanol. Following resuspension in nuclease-free water, the RNA was purified using the RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen, UK). The RNA integrity numbers from the Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA) were all over 9.9. Thereafter, the Illumina Truseq RNA Sample Preparation kit v1 protocol was followed directly, using 4 μg of RNA per sample as starting material. Libraries were checked for quality, and quantified using the Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent), before being sequenced in barcoded pools of 12 individual fish on the Illumina Hisequation 2000 instrument (100 base paired-end sequencing, v3 chemistry); all sequence data were deposited in the European Nucleotide Archive under accession number ERP003968.

Transcriptome assembly

The quality of the sequencing output was assessed using FastQC (http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/; version 0.11.2). Quality filtering and removal of residual adaptor sequences was conducted on read pairs using Trimmomatic v.0.32 (Bolger et al. 2014). Specifically, residual Illumina specific adaptors were clipped from the reads, leading and trailing bases with a Phred score less than 15 were removed, and the read trimmed if a sliding window average Phred score over four bases was less than 20. Only paired-end reads where both sequences had a length greater than 36 bases postfiltering were retained. The most recent salmon genome assembly (ICSASG_v2, NCBI assembly GCA_000233375.4) was used as a reference for read mapping. Filtered reads were mapped to the genome using Tophat2 v. 2.0.12 (Kim et al. 2013), which leverages the short read aligner Bowtie2 v.2.2.3 (Langmead and Salzberg 2012), allowing a maximum of two mismatches. Using Cuffdiff v.2.2.1 (Trapnell et al. 2012), the aligned reads were merged into a transcriptome assembly. The transcriptome was annotated against NCBI nonredundant protein and nucleic acid databases using local Blast v.2.3.0+ (Altschul et al. 1997) with a cut-off e-value of 10−5. The completeness of the salmon transcriptome was evaluated using Blast searches with a cut-off e-value of 10−25 against a set of 248 core eukaryotic genes (Parra et al. 2007).

SNP annotation

For every gene, the most highly expressed transcript variant was selected to identify candidate coding regions using Transdecoder v.2.0.1 (http://transdecoder.sourceforge.net/). Open reading frames (ORF) were predicted for every transcript, requiring a minimum of 100 amino acids (to reduce the number of potential false positives). All the predicted proteins were aligned against the manually curated UniRef90 database using local Blast v.2.3.0+ (Altschul et al. 1997) with a cut-off e-value of 10−5, discarding ORFs without positive matches. Finally, the longest ORF was selected as the canonical protein for each transcript. The final set of coding regions was used to build a genome annotation file which was used to predict the functional significance of all the SNPs on the ‘ssalar01’ SNP array using SnpEff v.4.2 (Cingolani et al. 2012).

Data availability

The authors state that all data necessary for confirming the conclusions presented in the article are represented fully within the article.

Results and Discussion

Linkage map construction

A pedigreed population of 622 individual Atlantic salmon (534 offspring, 28 sires, and 60 dams) were successfully genotyped using the high density Affymetrix SNP array ‘ssalar01’ (Houston et al. 2014a). SNPs were assigned to putative linkage groups, and then ordered on each linkage group using Lep-Map2 (Rastas et al. 2016). A total of 111,908 SNPs was retained following QC filtering, of which 96,396 (86%) were assigned and ordered on the 29 linkage groups (which correspond to the karyotype of European Atlantic salmon). The number of SNPs per chromosome varied from 1128 to 6080, and was positively correlated with the number of SNPs per chromosome in previously published Atlantic salmon SNP linkage maps of Lien et al. (2011) (r = 0.94), and Gonen et al. (2014) (r = 0.87). The flanking sequences of the SNPs on the linkage map were aligned to the salmon reference genome assembly (GCA_000233375.4) to determine their putative physical position (Supplemental Material, File S1). There was a high positive correlation between the genetic map position and the reference sequence position of the SNPs (Table 1), and the number of SNPs per chromosome was dependent on chromosome sequence length (Figure 1). SNP density for the successfully genotyped and mapped markers from the ‘ssalar1’ array is relatively constant across the genome, with an average of 1 SNP per ∼23 kb in the assembled chromosomes, and 1 SNP per 0.05 cM (male) and 0.07 cM (female) in the full linkage map.

Table 1. The characteristics of the physical and genetic maps of the 29 Atlantic salmon (pairs of) chromosomes (GenBank reference GCA_000233375.4; Davidson et al. 2010).

Male Female
Chr. SNPs Physical Length (MB)a Physical Length of Unassigned Contigs (MB)a Max (cM) Correlationb Max (cM) Correlationb
1 6080 159 1.6 428.8 0.97 551.3 0.98
2 3506 73 3.1 173.5 0.80 404.4 0.85
3 4013 93 2.2 332.2 0.84 467.7 0.96
4 4173 82 1.1 156.6 0.82 183.6 0.95
5 3916 81 1.9 274.4 0.91 529.9 0.93
6 4073 87 2.3 264.2 0.88 689.1 0.89
7 2875 59 1.2 183.7 0.85 249.0 0.97
8 1128 26 0.6 181.6 0.87 326.4 0.97
9 4774 142 1.7 278.8 0.77 392.2 0.81
10 4146 116 0.9 82.8 0.79 166.8 0.97
11 3953 94 2.8 166.2 0.79 291.0 0.81
12 4321 92 2.6 95.7 0.80 239.5 0.80
13 4472 108 1.3 178.0 0.62 213.8 0.91
14 3878 94 1.4 96.4 0.73 123.5 0.92
15 4335 104 1.9 77.3 0.64 136.9 0.91
16 3316 88 2.3 141.9 0.80 137.7 0.90
17 2607 58 2.0 171.2 0.90 307.2 0.96
18 3196 71 1.4 91.7 0.85 105.9 0.92
19 3210 83 1.5 74.5 0.76 103.2 0.90
20 3687 87 1.5 96.5 0.82 112.5 0.93
21 2355 58 0.7 93.2 0.80 159.1 0.84
22 2634 63 0.4 73.6 0.74 78.0 0.88
23 2670 50 0.6 77.5 0.65 84.4 0.96
24 2538 49 0.3 379.0 0.91 458.2 0.97
25 2332 51 0.7 147.0 0.92 175.3 0.96
26 2063 48 2.2 166.2 0.92 161.8 0.95
27 2458 44 0.4 73.3 0.72 72.6 0.91
28 1878 40 0.7 143.1 0.94 156.0 0.99
29 1809 42 0.6 70.2 0.73 76.4 0.88
Total 96,396 2242 41.9 4769.0 — 7153.2 —
Avg 3324 77 1.4 164.5 0.81 246.7 0.92
Open in a new tab
a

The physical length is taken from the latest Atlantic salmon genome assembly [GenBank reference GCA_000233375.4 (Davidson et al. 2010)], and ‘unassigned contigs’ are those that were unplaced on the reference assembly but mapped to the chromosome in the linkage map.

b

The correlation between the genetic distance of SNPs (cM) on the linkage map and the physical distance (bp) according to the reference genome assembly.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Comparison of the number of SNPs in corresponding chromosomes and physical length retrieving from recent reference assembly (GenBank assembly reference GCA_000233375.4, Davidson et al. 2010). The correlation was approximately 0.95.

The most recent Atlantic salmon reference genome assembly (GCA_000233375.4) contains 2240 MB of sequence contigs anchored to chromosomes (78% of total assembly), and 647 MB of contigs that are not yet assigned to chromosome (22% of total assembly). Linkage mapping using high density SNP arrays was applied to orientate reference genome contigs and scaffolds, and to identify putative misassemblies in the recently published salmon genome paper (Lien et al. 2016). However, those linkage maps are unpublished. In the current study, a total of 4581 previously unassigned contigs comprising 41.9 MB of sequence was tentatively mapped to the 29 salmon chromosomes (Table 1 and File S2). While additional experiments would be required to confirm the correct position of these genome contigs, this linkage map has enabled an additional ∼1% of the entire reference genome assembly to be tentatively mapped to chromosomes, corresponding to ∼6.5% of the previously unassigned genome assembly. These contigs were spread across all 29 chromosome pairs (Table 1, and details given in File S1). Novel potentially misassembled regions were also identified in the reference sequence via regions of discordance between the linkage and physical maps, an example of which is between ∼11.5 MB and 11.8 MB on Chromosome 26 (File S3).

There were substantial differences in the patterns of recombination between the sexes. The female linkage map covered 7153 cM (ranging from 72.6 to 689.0 cM per chromosome), whereas the male linkage map covered 4769 cM (ranging from 70.2 to 428.8 cM per chromosome) (Table 1). Overall, the female map was ∼1.5 × longer than the male map, consistent with previous Atlantic salmon SNP linkage maps (Lien et al. 2011; Gonen et al. 2014). The pattern of recombination across the genome was notably different between the sexes, with female recombination rates being higher across much of the genome, except for some subtelomeric regions where male recombination was substantially higher (e.g., Figure 2). This phenomenon has been observed in several previous salmonid linkage maps (Sakamoto et al. 2000; Lien et al. 2011; Miller et al. 2011; Brieuc et al. 2014; Gonen et al. 2014), but the availability of the reference genome enables a more detailed investigation. Therefore, linkage and physical maps were aligned, and a proxy of recombination rate (number of centimorgans per megabase) was estimated at regular intervals on each chromosome, with each interval corresponding to 2% of the total chromosome’s physical length. The average recombination rate for each corresponding interval on the 29 chromosomes was calculated and graphed against the distance from the nearest telomere (Figure 3). The results highlight the phenomenon of markedly high male recombination in some subtelomeric regions, on average ∼10 × higher than regions of the genome nearer the middle of the chromosome (Figure 3).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

A comparison between genetic and physical maps of a representative chromosome (Chr 22), reflecting the recombination pattern difference between males and females. Details of genetic distance and physical distance for all mapped loci are given in File S1.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

A comparison of male and female recombination level (cM/Mb) graphed according to physical distance from the nearest chromosome end (expressed as a percentage of total chromosome size in megabases).

Transcriptome assembly and annotation

To annotate the mapped SNPs and predict their function according to their position relative to putative genes, an annotated reference transcriptome was created. RNA-seq of 48 individual salmon fry yielded 927 M raw paired-end sequence reads, of which 93% remained after trimming and filtering. Filtered reads were aligned to the most recent Atlantic salmon reference genome assembly (GCA_000233375.4; 82.2% concordant pair alignment) to generate a reference transcriptome. The alignment resolved 202,009 putative transcripts corresponding to 65,803 putative genes, consisting of 36,846 single transcript genes, and 28,957 multi-transcript genes (Table 2 and File S4). The average length of the transcripts was 4127 bp, with an N50 of 5710, an N90 of 2323, and > 90% of transcripts longer than 500 bp. The assembled transcripts were annotated using BLASTx and BLASTn searches against the NCBI nonredundant protein and nucleic acid databases, respectively. Of the 65,803 total putative genes, 58,416 (88.8%) showed significant similarity to known proteins, while an additional 2732 (4.2%) showed significant similarity to nucleotide entries in the NCBI nonredundant nucleotide database (File S5). The proportion of unannotated genes was higher for the shorter transcript sequences (File S6), but all transcripts were retained (since a relevant minimum size threshold was not apparent). The completeness of the transcriptome was evaluated against a set of 248 core eukaryotic genes described in Parra et al. (2007); 247 of these genes were found in our transcriptome (BLASTn e-value < E10−25), 222 of which had at least 90% coverage, and 153 of which were fully covered. A total of 53,950 identified genes was located within chromosomes on the Atlantic salmon genome assembly, while the remaining 11,853 were aligned to unassigned contigs. Of these 11,853 genes, 1647 (13.9%) were located in contigs assigned to chromosomes using the linkage map of the current study (Table 1 and File S7).

Table 2. Summary statistics for the Atlantic salmon RNA-seq transcriptome assembly.

Transcriptome assembly details Number
Transcripts 202,009
Genes 65,803
Single transcript genes 36,846
Multi-transcript genes 28,957
Genes in assembled chromosomes 53,950
Genes in unassigned contigs 11,853
Average transcript length 4127
N50 5710
N90 2323
Transcripts > 500 bp 195,224
Genes annotated using protein database 58,416
Genes annotated using DNA database 2732
Open in a new tab

SNP annotation

The RNA-seq based transcriptome described above was used to predict ORFs and protein sequences in order to annotate the SNPs present on the ‘ssalar01’ array (Table 3 and File S8). A total of 106,424 SNPs (95%) matched a single genome location, while 2857 SNPs matched two different genomic positions, related in part to the salmonid specific genomic duplication. An additional 880 SNPs mapped to three or more genome locations, indicative of repetitive elements or protein domains. It should be noted that filtering of SNPs during the design process for the array would have removed the majority of SNPs mapping to two or more locations (Houston et al. 2014a). The tentative annotation of all SNPs is given (File S6), but only those mapping to unique genomic regions are described below. Of these 106,424 unique SNPs, 48,842 (45.9%) were located in putative genes, with the remainder mapping to intergenic regions. Of the genic SNPs, the majority were in putative intronic regions (34,534; 70.7%), although 483 of these were associated with splicing regions, and therefore have a higher likelihood of being functionally relevant. The remaining genic SNPs were mapped to putative untranslated regions (UTRs; 8091), with a larger amount of SNPs in the 3′-UTR as expected (6224 vs. 1867 in the 5′-UTR); and to putative exons (5856). A total of 2465 putative nonsynonymous SNPs was identified, in addition to 39 SNPs predicted to cause gain/loss of start/stop codons, which have a high likelihood of functional consequences (File S8). As an example, a premature stop codon was found in phospholipase D, an enzyme which produces the signal molecule phosphatidic acid, which is also a precursor for the biosynthesis of many other lipids (McDermott et al. 2004). The distribution of the SNP functional categories across the 29 chromosome pairs is given in Table 4. It is important to note that these predicted SNP effects will contain a proportion of false positives due to inevitable errors in the predicted structure of the genes. Nonetheless, their annotation combined with their linkage and physical mapping provides a valuable resource for users of the high density ‘ssalar01’ array in particular, and for salmonid genomics researchers in general.

Table 3. Predicted numbers, location and effect of the mapped SNPs according to their position on the annotated reference genome.

Summary of annotated SNPs
Intergenic 57,582
Genic 48,842 UTR 8091 5′ 1867
3′ 6224
Intron 34,534 Splice region 483
Nonsplice region 34,051
Exon 5856 Synonymous 3352
Nonsynonymous 2465
Gain or loss of start/stop codon 39
Open in a new tab

Table 4. Number of predicted genes and functional categories of SNPs split according to chromosome.

Genes and SNPs per Chromosome
Chromosome Genes Exonic SNPs Intronic SNPs UTR SNPs Intergenic SNPs
1 3507 181 877 206 4717
2 2711 222 1116 284 1630
3 2741 225 1209 312 2026
4 2255 246 1301 309 2066
5 2286 220 1184 299 2030
6 2441 217 1286 312 2006
7 1526 152 928 192 1455
8 875 44 335 67 525
9 3062 244 1415 374 2563
10 2568 217 1341 300 2140
11 2308 162 1168 249 2207
12 2672 268 1398 349 2088
13 2524 276 1516 328 2181
14 2343 236 1154 314 2034
15 2400 271 1415 294 2138
16 2205 193 1003 253 1721
17 1770 144 744 206 1307
18 1767 142 1041 205 1654
19 1694 125 1013 203 1743
20 2072 211 1093 257 1830
21 1056 129 700 160 1252
22 1398 153 811 189 1416
23 1138 142 863 192 1400
24 1040 146 860 187 1238
25 1032 113 585 133 1431
26 1372 102 606 128 1082
27 1096 129 828 195 1221
28 912 92 593 147 992
29 821 88 598 120 937
Total 55,592 5090 28,981 6764 51,030
Avg 1917 176 999 233 1760
Open in a new tab

Conclusion

A linkage map comprising > 96,000 SNPs from the ‘ssalar01’ array was created, annotated, and integrated with the reference genome assembly. This represents the highest density SNP linkage map for any salmonid species. Alignment of the linkage and physical maps revealed good agreement between genetic map, and the mapping allowed a further circa 1% of the salmon reference genome assembly to be tentatively assigned to chromosomes. Marked heterochiasmy was observed, with male recombination rate substantially lower than females across much of the genome, but with a notably high level in some subtelomeric regions. Finally, the mapped SNPs were annotated and categorized according to their predicted function. The map will be another useful resource for salmonid genomics research.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Material
supp_6_7_2173__index.html (1.8KB, html)

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge (i) Mike Stear, Karim Gharbi, Bill Roy, Matt Tinsley, Alastair Hamilton, Derrick Guy, and Alan Tinch for provision of the data and samples from the population used for map construction; (ii) David Verner-Jeffreys, Richard Paley, Georgina Rimmer, and Ian Tew at the Centre for Environment Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas) for contribution to the disease challenge experiment from which the RNA-Seq samples were derived; and (iii) Lep-Map 2 software developer, Pasi Rastas, for the technical suggestions for the linkage map construction. RNA sequencing and SNP array genotyping were carried out by Edinburgh Genomics, The University of Edinburgh. Edinburgh Genomics is partly supported through core grants from the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) (R8/H10/56), Medical Research Council (MRC) (MR/K001744/1), and the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) (BB/J004243/1). This research was supported by BBSRC grants (BB/H022007/1, BB/F002750/1, BB/F001959/1) awarded to The Roslin Institute and University of Stirling, and by BBSRC Institute Strategic Funding Grants to The Roslin Institute (BB/J004235/1, BB/J004324/1, BB/J004243/1). D.R. was funded by a postgraduate grant from Fundación Barrié. The authors also acknowledge the support of the MASTS pooling initiative (The Marine Alliance for Science and Technology for Scotland) in the completion of this study. MASTS is funded by the Scottish Funding Council (grant reference HR09011). and contributing institutions. The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author contributions: R.D.H., J.E.B., and J.B.T. conceived and designed the study; N.R.L. performed laboratory experiments; H.Y.T., D.R., and M.B. analyzed data; and H.Y.T., D.R., and R.D.H. wrote the manuscript.

Footnotes

Supplemental material is available online at www.g3journal.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1534/g3.116.029009/-/DC1

Communicating editor: D. J. de Koning

Literature Cited

  1. Allendorf, F. W., and G. H. Thorgaard, 1984 Evolutionary genetics of fishes, pp. 55–93 in Tetraploidy and the Evolution of Salmonid Fishes, edited by B. J. Turner, Plenum Press, New York. [Google Scholar]
  2. Allendorf F. W., Bassham S., Cresko W. A., Limborg M. T., Seeb L. W., et al. , 2015.  Effects of crossovers between homeologs on inheritance and population genomics in polyploid-derived salmonid fishes. J. Hered. 106: 217–227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Altschul S. F., Madden T. L., Schäffer A. A., Zhang J., Zhang Z., et al. , 1997.  Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25: 3389–3402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bolger A. M., Lohse M., Usadel B., 2014.  Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30: 2114–2120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brieuc M. S. O., Waters C. D., Seeb J. E., Naish K., 2014.  A dense linkage map for Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) reveals variable chromosomal divergence after an ancestral whole genome duplication event. G3 (Bethesda) 4: 447–460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cingolani P., Platts A., Wang L. L., Coon M., Nguyen T., et al. , 2012.  A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff: SNPs in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster strain w 1118; iso-2; iso-3. Fly (Austin) 6: 80–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Correa K., Lhorente J. P., López M. E., Bassini L., Naswa S., et al. , 2015.  Genome-wide association analysis reveals loci associated with resistance against Piscirickettsia salmonis in two Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) chromosomes. BMC Genomics 16: 854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Danzmann R. G., Gharbi K., 2001.  Gene mapping in fishes: a means to an end. Genetica 111: 3–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Davey J. W., Hohenlohe P. A., Etter P. D., Boone J. Q., Catchen J. M., et al. , 2011.  Genome-wide genetic marker discovery and genotyping using next-generation sequencing. Nat. Rev. Genet. 12: 499–510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Davidson W. S., Koop B. F., Jones S. J. M., Iturra P., Vidal R., et al. , 2010.  Sequencing the genome of the Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Genome Biol. 11: 403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. de Boer J. G., Yazawa R., Davidson W. S., Koop B. F., 2007.  Bursts and horizontal evolution of DNA transposons in the speciation of pseudotetraploid salmonids. BMC Genomics 8: 422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Fierst J. L., 2015.  Using linkage maps to correct and scaffold de novo genome assemblies: methods, challenges, and computational tools. Front. Genet. 6: 220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gharbi K., Matthews L., Bron J., Roberts R., Tinch A., et al. , 2015.  The control of sea lice in Atlantic salmon by selective breeding. J. R. Soc. Interface 12: 20150574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gilbey J., Verspoor E., McLay A., Houlihan D., 2004.  A microsatellite linkage map for Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Anim. Genet. 35: 98–105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Goddard M. E., Hayes B. J., 2009.  Mapping genes for complex traits in domestic animals and their use in breeding programmes. Nat. Rev. Genet. 10: 381–391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Goddard M. E., Hayes B. J., Meuwissen T. H., 2010.  Genomic selection in livestock populations. Genet. Res. 92: 413–421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gonen S., Lowe N. R., Cezard T., Gharbi K., Bishop S. C., et al. , 2014.  Linkage maps of the Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) genome derived from RAD sequencing. BMC Genomics 15: 166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Groenen M. A. M., Wahlberg P., Foglio M., Cheng H. H., Megens H. J., et al. , 2009.  A high-density SNP-based linkage map of the chicken genome reveals sequence features correlated with recombination rate. Genome Res. 19: 510–519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Houston R. D., Haley C. S., Hamilton A., Guy D. R., Mota-Velasco J. C., et al. , 2010.  The susceptibility of Atlantic salmon fry to freshwater infectious pancreatic necrosis is largely explained by a major QTL. Heredity (Edinb.) 105: 318–327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Houston R. D., Taggart J. B., Cézard T., Bekaert M., Lowe N. R., et al. , 2014a.  Development and validation of a high density SNP genotyping array for Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). BMC Genomics 15: 90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Houston, R. D., S. C. Bishop, D. R. Guy, A. E. Tinch, J. B. Taggart et al., 2014b Genome wide association analysis for resistance to sea lice in Atlantic salmon: application of a dense SNP array. Proceedings of the 10th World Congress of Genetics Applied to Livestock Production. August 17-22 2014, pp 10-12 [Google Scholar]
  22. Kim D., Pertea G., Trapnell C., Pimentel H., Kelley R., et al. , 2013.  TopHat2: accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions. Genome Biol. 14: R36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Langmead B., Salzberg S. L., 2012.  Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9: 357–359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lien S., Gidskehaug L., Moen T., Hayes B. J., Berg P. R., et al. , 2011.  A dense SNP-based linkage map for Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) reveals extended chromosome homeologies and striking differences in sex-specific recombination patterns. BMC Genomics 12: 615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lien S., Koop B. F., Sandve S. R., Miller J. R., Kent M. P., et al. , 2016.  The Atlantic salmon genome provides insights into rediploidization. Nature 10.1038/nature17164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Liu Z. J., 2010.  Next Generation Sequencing and Whole Genome Selection in Aquaculture, Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Des Moines, IA, 10.1002/9780470958964. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. McDermott M., Wakelam M. J. O., Morris A. J., 2004.  Phospholipase D. Biochem. Cell Biol. 82: 225–253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Meuwissen T. H. E., Hayes B. J., Goddard M. E., 2001.  Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 157: 1819–1829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Miller M. R., Brunelli J. P., Wheeler P. A., Liu S., Rexroad C. E., 3rd, et al. , 2011.  A conserved haplotype controls parallel adaptation in geographically distant salmonid populations. Mol. Ecol. 21: 237–249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Moen T., Hoyheim B., Munck H., Gomez-Raya L., 2004.  A linkage map of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) reveals an uncommonly large difference in recombination rate between the sexes. Anim. Genet. 35: 81–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Ødegård¸ J., Moen T., Santi N., Korsvoll S. A., Kjøglum S., et al. , 2014.  Genomic prediction in an admixed population of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Front. Genet. 5: 402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Parra G., Bradnam K., Korf I., 2007.  CEGMA: A pipeline to accurately annotate core genes in eukaryotic genomes. Bioinformatics 23: 1061–1067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Rastas P., Calboli F. C. F., Guo B., Shikano T., Merilä J., 2016.  Construction of ultradense linkage maps with Lep-MAP2: stickleback F2 recombinant crosses as an example. Genome Biol. Evol. 8: 78–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Sakamoto T., Danzmann R. G., Gharbi K., Howard P., Ozaki A., et al. , 2000.  A Microsatellite linkage map of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) characterized by large sex-specific differences in recombination rates. Genetics 155: 1331–1345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Sherry S. T., Ward M. H., Kholodov M., Baker J., Phan L., et al. , 2001.  dbSNP: the NCBI database of genetic variation. Nucleic Acids Res. 29: 308–311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Shi Y., Wang S., Gu Z., Lv J., Zhan X., et al. , 2014.  High-density single nucleotide polymorphisms linkage and quantitative trait locus mapping of the pearl oyster, Pinctada fucata martensii Dunker. Aquaculture 434: 376–384. [Google Scholar]
  37. Sonesson, A. K., 2010 Genomic selection for aquaculture: principles and procedures, pp. 151–163 in Next Generation Sequencing and Whole Genome Selection in Aquaculture, edited by Z. (J.) Liu. Blackwell Publishing, Des Moines, IA. [Google Scholar]
  38. Tortereau F., Servin B., Frantz L., Megens H.-J., Milan D., et al. , 2012.  A high density recombination map of the pig reveals a correlation between sex-specific recombination and GC content. BMC Genomics 13: 586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Trapnell C., Roberts A., Goff L., Pertea G., Kim D., et al. , 2012.  Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and Cufflinks. Nat. Protoc. 7: 562–578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Tsai H. Y., Hamilton A., Tinch A. E., Guy D. R., Gharbi K., et al. , 2015.  Genome wide association and genomic prediction for growth traits in juvenile farmed Atlantic salmon using a high density SNP array. BMC Genomics 16: 969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Tsai H. Y., Hamilton A., Tinch A. E., Guy D. R., Gharbi K., et al. , 2016.  Genomic prediction of host resistance to sea lice in farmed Atlantic salmon populations. Genet. Sel. Evol. (Accepted). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Wang L., Wan Z. Y., Bai B., Huang S. Q., Chua E., et al. , 2015.  Construction of a high-density linkage map and fine mapping of QTL for growth in Asian seabass. Sci. Rep. 5: 16358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Wright J. E., Jr., Johnson K., Hollister A., May B., 1983.  Meiotic models to explain classical linkage, pseudolinkage, and chromosome pairing in tetraploid derivative salmonid genomes. Isozymes Curr. Top. Biol. Med. Res. 10: 239–260. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Yáñez J. M., Houston R. D., Newman S., 2014.  Genetics and genomics of disease resistance in salmonid species. Front. Genet. 5: 415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Yáñez J. M., Newman S., Houston R. D., 2015.  Genomics in aquaculture to better understand species biology and accelerate genetic progress. Front. Genet. 6: 128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Yáñez J. M., Naswa S., López M. E., Bassini L., Correa K., et al. , 2016.  Genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) discovery in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar): validation in wild and farmed American and European populations. Mol. Ecol. Resour. (in press). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Material
supp_6_7_2173__index.html (1.8KB, html)
supp_g3.116.029009_FileS1.xls (22.6MB, xls)
supp_g3.116.029009_FileS2.xls (1.1MB, xls)
supp_g3.116.029009_FileS3.jpg (67KB, jpg)
supp_g3.116.029009_FileS4.zip (111MB, zip)
supp_g3.116.029009_FileS5.xlsx (8.2MB, xlsx)
supp_g3.116.029009_FileS6.tif (368.5KB, tif)
supp_g3.116.029009_FileS7.xlsx (8.4KB, xlsx)
supp_g3.116.029009_FileS8.xlsx (7.8MB, xlsx)

Data Availability Statement

The authors state that all data necessary for confirming the conclusions presented in the article are represented fully within the article.

Articles from G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES