Skip to main content
Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants logoLink to Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants
. 2016 May 20;22(2):193–205. doi: 10.1007/s12298-016-0356-0

Seed traits, fatty acid profile and genetic diversity assessment in Pongamia pinnata (L.) Pierre germplasm

Shyam Sundar Sharma 1,2, Md Aminul Islam 1, Anoop Anand Malik 1, Kamlesh Kumar 2, Madan Singh Negi 2, Shashi Bhushan Tripathi 1,2,
PMCID: PMC4938823  PMID: 27436911

Abstract

Phenotypic variation of important seed traits like seed length, seed breadth, seed thickness, 100 seed weight and seed oil content were recorded in a total of 157 collected accessions of Pongamia. Out of these, fatty acid profiles of 38 accessions selected based on their high and low oil content was analyzed. Fatty acid profile revealed high variability in stearic, oleic and linoleic acid which varied from 0.42 to 10.61 %, 34.34 to 74.58 %, and 7.00 to 31.28 % respectively. Variations in palmitic and linolenic acid were small. Iodine value, saponification number and cetane number (CN) of fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) of seed oil ranges from 186.99 to 201.25, 81.13 to 108.19 and 46.16 to 56.47 respectively. Fatty acid compositions, degree of unsaturation and CN are the important parameters, which are used to determine quality of FAME were used as biodiesel. Some of the Pongamia accessions identified were higher in oil content while some accessions showed higher degree of unsaturation and a few of them had CN values higher than 55. Genetic diversity analysis with six TE-AFLP primers generated a total of 334 bands out of which 174 (52.10 %) were polymorphic. The genetic similarity ranged from 0.11 to 0.47. These findings clearly showed high level of genetic diversity and all economically desirable traits were not present in a single genotype of Pongamia. All these traits could be selected from these CPTs and transfer to a single elite variety through selection and breeding programme and could be utilized for large scale multiplication and plantation to produce high quantity and quality biodiesel in future.

Keywords: Pongamia pinnata, Oil content, Fatty acid methyl esters, Gas chromatography, TE-AFLP, Genetic diversity

Introduction

Energy security is an important issue all over the world because reservoirs of fossil fuels are depleting day by day which also lead to increase in prices of petroleum products. So, we have to think an alternative and renewable source of energy which also emits less carbon to environment. A number of Tree Borne Oilseed species (TBOs), which can produce oil as a source of energy in the form of biodiesel have been identified in India and other countries (Tewari 2003). Pongamia pinnata (L.) Pierre has been found to be one of the most suitable feedstock because its oil can be used as a source of fuel for the biodiesel industry (Karmee and Chadha 2005). Pongamia also have other additional favorable attributes like its hardy nature, capable of fixing atmospheric nitrogen, high yield, high oil recovery and quality of oil. Pongamia tree also has several applications in area of medicine (Elanchezhiyan et al. 1993; Shivanna and Rajakumar 2010) and is also used in insecticides (Pavela 2009). Pongamia is a non-edible oil producing tree legume of India (Lakshmikanthan 1978). The species is found predominantly in Western Ghats of India and Southeast Asia. It is fast growing medium sized tree and starts to yield 7 years after planting (Pavithra et al. 2013). Each mature pod generally encloses 1–2 kidney shaped or elongated brownish red seeds. Oil yield is one of the most important traits determining the commercial viability of Pongamia pinnata as an energy crop. The oil content of Pongamia seed is about 32–42 % (Kaushik et al. 2007), which can be converted into biodiesel (FAME) by transesterification with methanol in the presence of an alkali catalyst (Karmee and Chadha 2005; Naik et al. 2008).

In recent years, significant research efforts have been made to explore plant-based fuels (Martini and Shell 1998). The potentiality of Pongamia oil as an important source of biodiesel is now well recognized (Karmee and Chadha 2005; Azam et al. 2005). The Pongamia seed oil predominantly contains four fatty acids, namely, palmitic, stearic, oleic and linoleic acid. In addition to these major fatty acids, its oil also contains very less amounts of linolenic, behenic and eicosenoic acid. Oleic acid is the major fatty acid among pongamia trees and generally constitute about half of the oil with a range from approximately one to two thirds (Arpiwi et al. 2012; Sunil et al. 2009). The biodiesel properties of seed oil and FAME are: saponification number (SN), which specifies the relative fatty acid chain length of the FAMEs; the iodine value (IV), measures number of double bonds in respective fatty acids and cetane number (CN), which measures indication of ignition quality of fuel. In the US biodiesel standard (BS 2002), the minimum CN value is 47, where the Pongamia accessions analyzed in this study exhibit CN values from 50 to 59 with a mean of 54.4 (Mukta et al. 2009).

The major bottleneck in harnessing the biofuel potential of this tree is the unavailability of any improved and characterized planting stock. The variation in the pattern of fruiting and flowering was observed in different individuals of this species, also few trees bear high fruit numbers as expected. The high phenotypic diversity was observed in this species, thus providing an opportunity for its genetic improvement (Kaushik et al. 2007). It is important to characterize and select candidate plus trees (CPTs) of Pongamia for the improvement of this species. A plus tree is an individual tree of a species possessing superior morphological and reproductive characters than other individuals of the same species (Kesari and Rangan 2010).

Recently, initiatives have been taken towards molecular characterization and identification of superior genotypes of Pongamia. In the previous work, we attempted to analyze changes in oil and fatty acid profile at various developmental stages of seed in Pongamia (Sharma et al. 2015). The present study was carried out to assess variability and divergence of oil, fatty acids profile and important biodiesel traits for selection of CPTs with more efficient biodiesel yielder and their large scale commercial plantation for its development as an economically viable tree for biodiesel production across India and other tropical countries.

Materials and methods

Plant material

Germplasm collection surveys were conducted during the months of April–June, 2007–2011 from different regions of NCT of Delhi. Some accessions were also collected from other states of India (Assam, Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh) and a total of 157 accessions were collected. Passport data including site of collection, number of pods per bunch, number of seeds per pod and important seed traits were recorded. Global Positioning System (Garmin eTrex Vista Cx) used to mark the location of collected germplasm. Explored area lies between 28°32′8″–28°41′22″N and 77°23′28″–77°07′52″E covering parts of East Delhi, Central Delhi, West Delhi, East Delhi and Noida region of NCT of Delhi, India. Representative samples consisting of 1–2 kg mature pods were collected in cloth bags and seeds were separated from pods by manual dehulling. The mature trees which attained age of 6–10 years were selected. Seeds were dried in an oven at 50 °C till no weight loss was seen on further drying.

Oil content analysis

For oil content analysis, several seeds were pooled to represent an accession. Seed oil content was analyzed by solvent extraction using n-hexane as solvent in a Soxhlet apparatus (SOCS PLUS, Pelican Equipments, Chennai). Seed powder (1 g) and 60 mL of n-hexane were used per batch. Extraction was carried out at 80 °C for 1 h after which fast solvent recovery was done at 180 °C for 30 min. Two replicates of each accession were used and means were taken. The oil content for each accession was calculated and expressed as percentage (w/w) of dry seed using following equation

Percent oil content=Wfb-Wib/Ws×100

where, Wfb is final beaker weight, Wib is initial beaker weight and Ws is the sample weight.

Fatty acid analysis

For fatty acid analysis using gas chromatography (GC), 38 Pongamia accessions were selected from both the tails of the oil content distribution of 157 accessions representing the top as well as the bottom of the distribution table. Analysis was done in two replicates using the method described by Thies (1971) with minor modifications. Dried seed samples of individual accessions were taken and crushed to powder with the help of mortar and pestle. Seed powder (25 mg) was incubated with 750 µL of sodium methylate for 20 min. Then iso-octane (300 µL) was added and incubated for additional 20 min. The clear upper phase was taken in a GC vial and 400 µL of iso-octane was added. Fatty acid profiles were analyzed using a GC (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) fitted with a flame ionization detector (FID). The oven, injector and detector blocks temperature were maintained at 210, 230 and 250 °C respectively and nitrogen gas was used as the carrier. The proportion of FAME was expressed as percentage of total fatty acids excluding the minor constituents.

Biodiesel properties like SN, IV of oil were calculated using FAMEs composition of oil with the help of following equations (Kalayasiri et al. 1996):

SN=560×Ai/MWiIV=254×D×Ai/MWi

where, Ai is the percentage, D is the number of double bonds and MWi is the molecular weight of each component.

Whereas, Cetane Number of FAMEs was calculated by the following equation (Krisnangkura 1986):

CN=46.3+5458SN-0.225×IV

Descriptive statistics on oil content and fatty acid data was analyzed. Correlation coefficients between various seed and oil traits of Pongamia genotypes were calculated using SPSS software (Version 17.0). Pongamia accessions were classified into three categories, namely, low (<x¯ − 1s), medium (x¯ − 1s to x¯ + 1s) and high (>x¯ + 1s) based on seed oil and biodiesel traits where x¯ and s are the mean and standard deviation respectively (Mukta et al. 2009; Sarkar and Deb 1984).

Three endonuclease (TE)-AFLP assay

The protocol for TE-AFLP marker analysis was based on van der Wurff et al. (2000) with minor modifications. In current study, Eco RI, Pst I and Mse I were used instead of Bam HI, Xba I and Rsa I that were used in the original protocol. The detailed protocol of TE-AFLP has already published by our group (Sharma et al. 2011).

Genotyping and evaluation of molecular marker attributes

A total of 38 accessions were genotyped using six TE-AFLP primers combinations. The amplicons were in the size range of 80–450 bps. Amplified fragments were scored manually for their presence (denoted as ‘1’) or absence (denoted as ‘0’) for each primer combination. For analysis clear, distinct and polymorphic bands were recorded.

The binary matrix was used to estimate genetic dissimilarities using Jaccard’s coefficient [GDij = (b + c)/a + (b + c); (Jaccard 1908)], where GD is the genetic dissimilarity measures between individuals i and j, a is the number of polymorphic bands that are shared by i and j, b is the number of bands present in i and absent in j, c is the number of bands present in j and absent in i. The dissimilarity matrix was subjected to neighbor joining clustering in order to construct the phenetic dendrogram DARWin software version 5.0.158 (Perrier and Jacquemoud-Collet 2006). The robustness and reliability of the phenograms were tested by bootstrap analysis for 1000 bootstraps for computing probabilities in terms of percentage for each node of the tree using the DARWin software (Perrier and Jacquemoud-Collet 2006). Different marker attributes like polymorphic information content (PIC), resolving power (RP), marker index (MI) and degree of polymorphism were analyzed (Sharma et al. 2011).

Results and discussion

Seed and oil traits

The mean performance of seed traits like seed width, seed length, seed thickness, seed weight and total seed oil content of 157 Pongamia accessions revealed significant differences (Table 1). Maximum value for seed length (25.40 mm) was observed in P276 and minimum (16.40 mm) in P002 accession. Seed thickness also varied significantly among all the accessions. It has been observed that maximum 100-seed weight (250 g) was recorded from P276 accession. In this context of seed trait, Pongamia accession P276 from Dwarka region of Delhi has maximum seed length and 100-seed weight. A study on seed and oil traits across twenty four CPTs from Jharkhand revealed that, a genotype CPT-19 recorded maximum values for seed length (27.93 mm), 100-seed weight (202.89 g) and total oil content (44.33 %) (Divakara et al. 2010) which are more similar to results of current study.

Table 1.

Mean values for important seed traits in Pongamia accessions

Sr. no. Accession ID Seed length (mm) Seed breadth (mm) Seed thickness (mm) 100-seed weight (g) Oil content (%)
1 P001 22.1 16.2 5.6 115 37.80
2 P002 16.4 12.9 7.2 91 29.50
3 P002 18.0 13.5 6.2 98 34.20
4 P003 21.2 13.0 6.8 132 37.93
5 P004 16.8 12.2 5.0 76 33.34
6 P007 17.2 11.3 5.8 120 20.20
7 P008 21.2 12.0 8.2 100 27.83
8 P009 17.4 13.5 5.2 92 33.86
9 P010 21.2 17.4 7.2 118 34.66
10 P012 18.8 13.2 5.8 76 31.81
11 P013 22.2 14.9 7.1 109 38.88
12 P015 23.4 15.0 8.4 117 36.83
13 P016 21.8 12.2 7.1 112 33.13
14 P017 20.8 12.2 6.8 64 27.81
15 P018 18.2 14.4 6.2 63 30.26
16 P019 17.8 16.2 6.8 115 33.53
17 P020 22.2 14.2 7.8 126 30.56
18 P021 23.4 17.2 8.1 165 28.71
19 P022 21.2 11.2 7.2 103 33.60
20 P024 18.2 12.4 7.2 99 30.80
21 P028 20.2 16.5 7.2 120 30.60
22 P031 17.2 12.8 6.8 76 36.69
23 P033 21.1 11.4 7.3 67 25.34
24 P037 18.2 16.8 7.2 117 32.43
25 P039 17.4 16.2 6.2 112 34.58
26 P042 17.7 12.6 6.2 64 35.53
27 P051 21.2 12.0 6.9 111 24.75
28 P053 19.3 12.3 6.5 91 31.85
29 P054 23.2 11.2 7.1 98 30.21
30 P056 17.3 13.6 5.3 69 22.60
31 P057 22.2 12.6 7.3 76 32.47
32 P058 17.8 14.2 5.8 120 33.98
33 P059 19.4 12.6 6.7 100 35.19
34 P060 23.4 11.3 7.8 92 31.54
35 P061 18.2 15.8 7.2 118 31.40
36 P062 20.8 12.0 6.5 76 32.40
37 P065 19.2 13.2 6.4 67 32.74
38 P070 23.8 16.7 8.0 117 35.06
39 P071 19.2 12.2 8.2 112 23.02
40 P075 18.2 12.8 6.6 60 28.77
41 P076 19.1 14.2 5.2 63 26.30
42 P077 17.5 16.2 6.2 113 30.60
43 P078 19.2 14.5 7.4 126 27.20
44 P079 23.1 13.8 8.4 165 31.20
45 P082 22.2 15.2 6.2 103 31.87
46 P083 18.3 13.3 6.6 99 24.95
47 P084 22.4 16.2 6.1 120 36.35
48 P085 19.2 14.4 7.8 70 29.88
49 P086 23.3 11.4 6.8 90 32.80
50 P089 22.2 12.2 7.1 91 29.20
51 P094 21.3 11.8 7.5 83 29.40
52 P099 20.2 13.8 8.7 133 33.20
53 P101 22.3 12.4 7.8 81 31.74
54 P103 23.2 13.5 7.4 123 33.00
55 P104 21.1 12.2 7.5 105 34.51
56 P105 22.9 12.2 7.3 70 37.99
57 P106 23.3 11.4 7.4 96 32.41
58 P107 22.3 12.4 7.5 91 28.60
59 P108 21.8 11.2 7.2 90 35.22
60 P110 21.6 13.2 8.2 127 34.40
61 P111 21.2 11.2 8.4 113 31.40
62 P124 21.3 11.3 7.8 102 28.00
63 P126 23.7 11.8 8.2 92 30.20
64 P127 20.2 14.2 7.8 128 29.75
65 P130 22.8 14.4 7.2 126 33.75
66 P133 22.0 12.3 7.2 70 29.60
67 P134 23.1 11.5 7.2 96 32.00
68 P135 23.1 11.3 6.5 91 30.80
69 P137 22.8 12.4 7.2 90 30.00
70 P139 22.8 13.4 6.2 94 30.20
71 P140 20.2 14.1 6.2 80 28.00
72 P147 21.5 12.8 6.8 94 29.40
73 P148 22.2 13.3 8.2 87 29.00
74 P157 19.2 13.4 7.8 139 34.73
75 P158 22.2 13.8 8.8 155 27.82
76 P159 20.2 14.1 6.3 86 23.66
77 P160 21.4 12.3 7.8 113 28.06
78 P161 23.1 11.4 7.1 88 37.97
79 P162 21.1 14.2 7.2 99 36.47
80 P164 19.2 13.2 8.2 109 34.19
81 P165 20.1 13.3 5.8 85 23.31
82 P166 17.2 12.1 6.5 51 23.47
83 P167 23.1 11.8 6.4 92 29.00
84 P168 23.3 11.4 6.5 85 34.32
85 P169 22.2 15.0 7.4 154 31.87
86 P170 22.8 12.3 6.8 94 34.19
87 P171 23.3 13.2 5.5 80 29.87
88 P172 23.2 12.8 6.2 90 30.49
89 P173 22.2 12.6 7.2 121 34.49
90 P174 21.8 12.2 8.0 109 31.42
91 P175 22.1 10.2 7.7 114 33.77
92 P176 23.4 11.2 6.8 91 30.20
93 P178 22.3 12.2 6.5 86 34.03
94 P179 18.2 13.2 8.2 107 33.13
95 P185 20.2 14.4 6.2 124 25.46
96 P186 22.2 15.1 6.5 105 32.02
97 P187 23.4 11.3 6.5 91 30.51
98 P188 21.4 13.0 8.4 134 33.93
99 P189 22.4 12.4 7.2 132 37.98
100 P190 21.4 14.2 7.2 125 31.20
101 P191 21.2 12.3 7.6 110 33.80
102 P192 20.4 14.2 6.2 84 36.60
103 P193 22.2 12.5 6.5 92 34.80
104 P194 21.2 13.2 7.2 88 33.40
105 P195 22.4 12.8 6.8 178 34.40
106 P196 22.2 14.2 9.8 44 29.80
107 P197 20.3 13.4 7.2 114 30.00
108 P198 21.2 14.2 6.8 118 37.00
109 P200 22.2 12.1 8.3 132 30.20
110 P201 19.5 12.8 6.6 96 28.40
111 P202 22.2 12.2 6.2 91 31.80
112 P203 22.4 12.2 6.6 90 35.60
113 P204 21.2 14.2 7.4 127 30.80
114 P205 21.1 11.4 7.5 113 32.20
115 P206 22.2 15.2 6.4 102 25.40
116 P207 21.2 12.4 6.2 92 24.00
117 P208 21.2 15.2 7.1 128 31.60
118 P209 21.2 14.2 7.3 126 37.20
119 P210 21.1 14.2 7.8 117 35.80
120 P211 19.3 13.5 6.5 94 33.20
121 P212 21.2 14.4 7.2 102 30.20
122 P213 22.1 15.2 7.2 163 36.00
123 P214 18.8 13.2 5.8 77 28.37
124 P215 20.2 14.2 8.2 133 32.87
125 P216 23.8 14.2 10.1 224 33.60
126 P217 19.5 14.3 7.4 144 34.72
127 P218 22.2 13.4 6.8 145 33.80
128 P219 21.2 14.2 7.0 168 29.60
129 P220 23.2 16.3 8.2 181 33.40
130 P221 22.6 12.4 7.7 136 29.00
131 P222 19.2 12.3 6.8 101 32.00
132 P223 21.3 16.2 6.3 118 33.80
133 P224 22.2 14.2 7.2 148 34.60
134 P225 19.8 13.6 6.8 93 33.80
135 P226 21.3 12.8 7.2 84 31.00
136 P227 21.4 14.2 9.2 155 36.85
137 P228 21.0 13.8 8.2 135 40.28
138 P229 22.2 14.4 9.2 159 32.00
139 P230 21.8 13.2 7.6 109 37.80
140 P232 20.2 14.2 7.2 120 31.42
141 P233 20.2 14.4 7.4 133 35.00
142 P234 24.4 16.3 8.0 182 32.34
143 P235 21.0 13.5 9.0 135 33.80
144 P236 22.2 14.8 8.2 151 36.00
145 P237 21.2 15.1 7.8 162 34.20
146 P273 21.0 14.2 6.3 80 31.20
147 P274 22.8 15.2 9.6 180 31.80
148 P275 23.3 15.4 8.5 175 34.00
149 P276 25.4 16.4 9.2 250 37.20
150 P277 23.2 16.2 8.8 192 32.00
151 Assam-1 22.2 14.8 8.2 155 28.20
152 Assam-2 22.4 12.8 8.2 182 29.00
153 Assam-3 NA NA NA 104 28.60
154 Assam-4 NA NA NA 122 28.40
155 Bangalore-1 23.0 12.2 7.5 133 28.00
156 Eluru-1 NA NA NA 102 26.00
157 Eluru-2 21.2 13.4 7.2 113 23.50
Mean 12.14 13.45 7.21 111.45 31.70
SD 1.84 1.51 0.93 32.60 3.71

Based on seed oil content, 157 Pongamia accessions were categorized in five groups (Table 2). Oil content of accessions varied from 20.20 to 40.28 % with a mean of 31.7 %. About 55 % of the accessions had oil content between 30 and 35 %. Ten accessions had oil content less than 25 % whereas one accession had oil content more than 40 %. Other studies also showed oil content was highly variable trait among trees. Across 75 germplasm accessions from Andhra Pradesh oil content ranges from 9.5 to 46 % (Mukta et al. 2009) and across 123 accessions from Andhra Pradesh and Orissa oil content ranges from 15 to 47 % (Sunil et al. 2009).

Table 2.

Distribution of 157 Pongamia pinnata accessions for seed oil content

Phenotypic trait Range (%) Number of accession
Seed oil content (%) >40 1
35–40 25
30–35 86
25–30 35
<25 10

There was a positive correlation (all at P = 0.01) between seed weight and seed length (r = 0.35), seed breadth, (r = 0.46) and seed thickness (r = 0.56). There was no significant correlation these seed traits and oil content (Table 3). The results obtained in this study correlated with the earlier study by Sunil et al. (2009) and Arpiwi et al. (2012).

Table 3.

Correlation between important seed and oil traits of Pongamia genotypes

Seed length Seed breadth Seed thickness 100-seed weight Oil content
Seed length 1.00
Seed breadth −0.05 1.00
Seed thickness 0.410** 0.12 1.00
100-seed weight 0.359** 0.465** 0.568** 1.00
Oil content 0.201** 0.192** 0.166* 0.239** 1.00

** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level

* Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level

Fatty acid profile analysis

The fatty acid composition of oil governs its chemical properties and its efficacy as biodiesel. Gas chromatography analysis of the selected accessions exhibited very high variability in palmitic, stearic, oleic, linoleic and linolenic acid content (Table 4). Accessions P001, P003, P189 and P198 had high (>67.75 %) oleic acid content whereas accessions P017, P056, P105, P140, P158 and P161 had high (>22.57 %) linoleic acid content. The oleic acid content observed in these accessions is slightly higher than the previous report (Mukta et al. 2009). Accessions P056, P105, P140, P161 and P166 had high (>12.49 %) palmitic acid content whereas accessions P070, P105, P140, P161 and P165 had high (>7.82 %) stearic acid content (Table 5). Total unsaturated fatty acid content in the accessions varied from 68.7 to 87.6 %. Considering high genetic and phenotypic variability observed in Pongamia from India, effect of genetic factors on seed oil composition is very likely (Sharma et al. 2011; Kaushik et al. 2007). Bala and coworkers (Bala et al. 2011) reported the presence of significant levels of erucic acid in Pongamia trees from Western India. The absence of erucic acid in the present accessions may be due to genetic as well as environmental factors. Sharma et al. (2015) reported the significant variation in seed oil and fatty acid composition during seed development in Pongamia.

Table 4.

Phenotypic variations in seed oil content, fatty acid profile and biodiesel properties of 38 of Pongamia accessions

Accession Oil content (%) Palmitic Stearic Oleic Linoleic Linolenic Oleic/linoleic ratio Saponification number Iodine value Cetane number
P001 37.80 8.66 5.01 67.98 13.06 1.07 5.21 191.77 87.72 55.02
P003 37.93 9.69 0.52 70.29 15.61 1.67 4.50 196.07 96.05 52.52
P007 20.20 11.02 5.94 62.33 16.59 1.49 3.76 195.45 90.18 53.94
P008 27.83 12.36 7.44 63.58 10.07 2.09 6.31 191.99 81.13 56.47
P013 38.88 9.02 4.39 63.79 16.02 3.45 3.98 193.73 95.82 52.91
P015 36.83 10.16 4.18 61.67 17.55 1.98 3.51 191.70 92.67 53.92
P017 27.81 11.38 3.74 52.63 27.92 3.76 1.89 199.87 108.19 49.26
P031 36.69 9.04 4.56 60.98 17.94 2.77 3.40 191.00 94.91 53.52
P033 25.34 7.98 7.35 60.71 17 1.61 3.57 189.43 89.79 54.91
P042 35.53 10.45 6.43 56.05 19.53 2.53 2.87 190.68 92.70 54.07
P051 24.75 10.18 4.55 61.68 17.17 2.11 3.59 192.00 92.34 53.95
P056 22.60 13.72 1.46 50.85 31.28 0.68 1.63 197.48 104.25 50.48
P059 35.19 9.96 5.49 60.75 16.66 2.99 3.65 192.27 92.99 53.76
P070 35.06 10.09 8.04 58.81 15.87 2.09 3.71 190.34 87.35 55.32
P071 23.02 10.84 6.52 62.49 16.7 0.32 3.74 194.38 87.32 54.73
P076 26.30 9.94 7.46 58.08 19.24 3.19 3.02 196.36 95.81 52.54
P078 27.20 10.46 4.73 58.34 21.11 3.05 2.76 196.10 99.05 51.85
P083 24.95 12.07 4.91 63.72 15.98 3.02 3.99 200.33 94.51 52.28
P105 37.99 15.49 8.05 45.35 24.96 5.1 1.82 199.67 99.95 51.15
P108 35.22 8.06 6.44 65.6 14.4 1.08 4.56 191.25 88.03 55.03
P124 28.00 9.99 6.46 57.11 18.25 4.28 3.13 192.80 96.13 52.98
P140 28.00 14.41 9.83 34.34 27.13 7.27 1.27 187.68 99.92 52.90
P158 27.82 10.65 5.47 51.01 25.93 2.69 1.97 192.34 100.20 52.13
P161 37.97 13.33 10.02 43.8 24.67 3.86 1.78 192.68 94.64 53.33
P162 36.47 9.33 5.85 64.24 16.07 2.13 4.00 195.62 92.71 53.34
P165 23.31 8.06 10.61 64.1 14.14 0.18 4.53 194.15 83.75 55.57
P166 23.47 14.18 6.1 63.62 14.22 1.87 4.47 201.25 88.09 53.60
P189 37.98 8.9 5.55 74.58 10.8 0.16 6.91 200.10 87.07 53.99
P198 37.00 7.82 5.51 71.42 11.61 0.57 6.15 193.84 86.81 54.92
P203 35.60 9.79 6.71 60.52 14.17 2.84 4.27 188.57 87.86 55.47
P206 25.40 12.18 4.93 62.13 14.07 3.72 4.42 195.05 91.54 53.69
P209 37.20 10.58 5.05 59.93 17.18 2.26 3.49 190.71 91.20 54.40
P210 35.80 10.18 4.79 62.07 16.58 3.14 3.74 194.14 94.44 53.16
P213 36.00 10.5 5.34 59.73 15.54 2.04 3.84 186.99 87.44 55.81
P228 40.28 11.78 4.74 54.75 21.38 3.85 2.56 194.03 98.50 52.27
P230 37.80 12.48 0.42 65.29 16.67 1.39 3.92 193.61 92.71 53.63
P236 36.00 9.53 5.59 66.42 12.66 2.78 5.25 194.36 90.27 54.07
P276 37.20 8.99 5.18 63.58 18.97 1.23 3.35 196.23 94.90 52.76
Mean 32.06 10.61 5.67 60.11 17.76 2.43 3.70 193.84 92.87 53.57
SD 6.06 1.87 2.15 7.63 4.82 1.43 1.27 3.49 5.58 1.49
Range 20.20–38.88 7.82–15.49 0.42–10.61 34.34–74.58 10.07–31.28 0.16–7.27 1.27–6.91 186.99–201.25 81.13–108.19 46.16–56.47

Table 5.

Distribution of Pongamia pinnata accessions based on seed oil content, fatty acid profile and biodiesel properties

Trait Low (<x¯ − 1s) Medium (x¯ − 1s to x¯ + 1s) High (>x¯ + 1s)
Seed oil content (%) 007, 033, 051, 056, 071, 083, 165, 166, 206 001, 003, 008, 015, 017, 031, 042, 049, 070, 076, 078, 105, 108, 124, 140, 158, 161, 162, 189, 203, 209, 210, 213, 230, 236, 276 013, 228
Fatty acid content (%)
Palmitic 001, 033, 108, 165, 198 003, 007, 008, 013, 015, 017, 031, 042, 051, 059, 070, 071, 076, 078, 083, 124, 158, 162, 189, 203, 206, 209, 210, 213, 218, 230, 236,276 056, 105, 140,161, 166
Stearic 003, 056, 230 001, 007, 008, 013, 015, 017, 031, 033, 042, 051, 059, 071, 076, 078, 083, 108, 124, 158, 162, 166, 189, 198, 203, 206, 209, 210, 213, 228, 236, 276 070, 105, 140, 161, 165
Oleic 056, 105, 140, 158, 161 007,008, 013, 015, 017, 031, 033, 042, 051, 059, 070, 071, 076, 078, 083, 108, 124, 162, 165, 166, 203, 206, 209, 210, 213, 228, 230, 236, 276 001, 003, 189, 198
Linoleic 008, 189, 198, 236 001, 003, 007, 013, 015, 031, 033, 042, 059, 070, 071, 076, 078, 083, 108, 124, 162, 165, 166, 203, 206, 209, 210, 213, 228, 230, 276 017, 056, 105, 140, 158,161
Linolenic 056, 071, 165, 189, 198 001, 003, 007, 008, 013, 015, 017, 031, 033, 042, 051, 059, 070, 076, 078, 083, 108, 158, 162, 166, 203, 206, 209, 210, 213, 228, 230, 236, 276 105, 124, 140, 161
Oleic/linoleic ratio 017, 056, 105, 140, 158, 161 003, 007, 013, 015, 031, 033, 042, 051, 059, 070, 071, 076, 078, 083, 108, 124, 162, 165, 166, 203, 206, 209, 210, 213, 228, 230, 276 001, 008, 189,198, 236
Saponification number 033, 070, 140, 203, 213 001, 003, 007, 008, 013, 015, 031, 042, 051, 059, 071, 076, 078, 108, 124, 158, 161, 162, 165, 198, 206, 209, 210, 228, 230, 236, 276 017, 056, 083, 105, 166, 189
Iodine value 008, 165, 189, 198 001, 003, 007, 013, 015, 031, 033, 042, 051, 059, 070, 071, 076, 083, 108, 124, 161, 162, 166, 203, 206, 209, 210, 213, 230, 236, 276 017, 056, 078, 105, 140, 158, 228
Cetane number 017, 056, 078, 105 001, 003, 007, 013, 015, 031, 033, 042, 051, 059, 071, 076, 083, 108, 124, 140, 158, 161, 162, 166, 189, 198, 206, 209, 210, 228, 230, 236, 276 008, 070, 165, 203, 213

Assessment of genetic diversity

In the present study, a total of 38 accessions were genotyped using six TE-AFLP primer combinations (Table 6), which were standardized previously for their polymorphism content (Sharma et al. 2011). The representative TE-AFLP gel profile obtained with primer combination E-AG × P-C is shown in (Fig. 1). Six primer combinations produced a total of 334 bands of which 174 (52.10 %) were polymorphic (Table 6). The maximum genetic similarity (Jc = 0.11) was between accessions P070 and P071, both from South Delhi. In contrast, the minimum genetic similarity (Jc = 0.47) was found between accessions P078 (from Eastern NCR) and P209 (from Kerala). The mean genetic distance among accessions was 0.32, which indicates that high level of genetic diversity exists in the analyzed accessions.

Table 6.

Summary of the number of TE-AFLP fragments scored for different primer pairs used in selective amplification

Sl no. Primer combination Total bands Polymorphic bands Polymorphism (%) PIC MI RP
1 E-AG × P-A 63 36 57.14 0.33 11.99 17.69
2 E-AG × P-C 61 37 60.66 0.29 10.82 16.00
3 E-AG × P-G 39 21 53.85 0.31 5.58 10.00
4 E-AT × P-A 73 31 42.47 0.34 10.41 15.34
5 E-AC × P-C 45 18 40.00 0.35 6.36 9.78
6 E-AC × P-A 53 31 58.49 0.26 8.21 11.21
Total 334 174 52.10 0.31 8.90 13.34

PIC polymorphic information content, MI marker index, RP resolving power

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Representative gel profiles of Pongamia using TE-AFLP primer E-AG × P-C. Lane numbers are the same as the serial numbers of the accessions mentioned in Table 4

For cluster analysis neighbor joining method was used and all accessions were grouped into three major clusters (Fig. 2). The cluster I grouped all accessions belongs to South Delhi and Eastern NCR, cluster II grouped accessions from East and West Delhi region whereas cluster III includes accessions from both clusters. This indicates that these accessions had significant similarity with accessions within Delhi and NCR used in this study. No significant grouping were observed based on oil content and fatty acid profile. The bootstrap values of all major nodes were higher than 40 % and a majority of them were in the range of 50–99 % indicating robustness of data and clustering results.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Dendrogram showing neighbor joining clustering of Pongamia. The numbers on nodes indicate % bootstrap values

Marker attributes

Discriminatory power of each TE-AFLP primers combination was studied by calculated PIC, MI and RP with polymorphic bands only. PIC value ranged from 0.26 (E-AC × P-A) to 0.35 (E-AC × P-C) and MI value from 5.58 (E-AG × P-G) to 11.99 (E-AG × P-A) while RP varied from 9.78 (E-AC × P-C) to 17.69 (E-AG × P-A) (Table 6).

In current years, studies have been directed to assess molecular diversity in P. pinnata using molecular markers such as RAPD, ISSR, AFLP and TE-AFLP (Kesari et al. 2010; Sahoo et al. 2010; Thudi et al. 2010; Sharma et al. 2011, 2014). Both TE-AFLP and AFLP indicated a high level of genetic diversity of P. pinnata collected from different locations of NCT of Delhi, India (Sharma et al. 2011) whilst ISSR indicated narrow genetic diversity within the trees from several regions of Orissa, India (Sahoo et al. 2010). AFLP detected higher levels of genetic diversity (100 %) in natural populations of P. pinnata on contrary the RAPD and ISSR showed lesser genetic diversity (aprox. 10 %) (Kesari et al. 2010). Another study on genetic diversity of Pongamia populations using AFLP markers in 33 CPT was undertaken in five agro-ecological zones of Southern Peninsular India (Pavithra et al. 2014). This study revealed relatively higher levels of gene diversity and high number of unique bands from eastern dry zone of Karnataka and southern dry and transition zone of Karnataka.

In the recent study a total of 38 Pongamia individuals from different locality of NCT of Delhi genotyped using six TE-AFLP primer combinations. Pongamia exhibited very high genetic diversity even within the accessions from Delhi and surrounding regions. All accessions grouped into three major clusters and highest genetic similarity was found in the accessions from South Delhi. It may be noted that this area of National Capital harbours the largest number of Pongamia trees. High diversity in pod and fruit traits in Pongamia from a neighboring area of NCT of Delhi has been reported earlier (Kaushik et al. 2007). A high level of genetic diversity in Pongamia is expected because of its presumed Indian origin. Scott et al. (2008) also suggested that P. pinnata were probably introduced from India to Australia early in human history.

Conclusions

Currently, no elite variety of Pongamia is available. Therefore, this species has high scope of improvement to make it suitable feedstock for biodiesel production through selection of economically important traits such as high seed yield, high oil content and desirable fatty acid composition. The current study showed that Pongamia accession P276 is high in 100 seed weight and seed yield, the accessions P013 and P228 high in oil content, the accessions P001, P003, P189 and P198 high in unsaturated fatty acids and likewise, accessions P008, P070, P165, P203 and P213 have CN values higher than 55. These findings clearly showed that all economically desirable traits are not present in a single genotype of Pongamia. Further, high level of genetic diversity was observed in collected germplasm of Pongamia and therefore there is a scope for its genetic improvement. In future, these identified CPTs could be used as parental material to combine all desirable traits in a single elite variety though selection and tree breeding programme in this species and further can be utilized for large scale multiplication and plantation to produce high quantity and quality biodiesel production.

Acknowledgments

The authors sincerely acknowledge the funding received from the Department of Science and Technology, Government of India, for the project (Grant Number SR/SO/PS-08/2006). Mr. Shyam Sundar Sharma thanks to Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, Government of India, for providing fellowship for this work. We thank Dr. Y. S. Sodhi, The Centre for Genetic Manipulation of crop plants, university of Delhi for their assistance in fatty acid profiling.

References

  1. Arpiwi NL, Yan G, Barbour EL, Plummer JA. Genetic diversity, seed traits and salinity tolerance of Millettia pinnata (L.) Panigrahi, a biodiesel tree. Genet Res Crop Evol. 2012 [Google Scholar]
  2. Azam MM, Waris A, Nahar NM. Prospects and potential of fatty acid methyl esters of some non-traditional seed oils for use as biodiesel in India. Biomass Bioenergy. 2005;29:293–302. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2005.05.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bala M, Nag TN, Kumar S, Vyas M, Kumar A, Bhogal NS. Proximate composition and fatty acid profile of Pongamia pinnata, a potential biodiesel crop. J Am Oil Chem Soc. 2011;88:559–562. doi: 10.1007/s11746-010-1699-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. BS (2002) Biodiesel Standard ASTM D6751, USA
  5. Divakara BN, Alur AS, Tripati S. Genetic variability and relationship of pod and seed traits in Pongamia Pinnata (L.) Pierre., a potential agroforestry tree. Int J Plant Prod. 2010;4:131–141. [Google Scholar]
  6. Elanchezhiyan M, Rajarajan S, Rajendran P, Subramaniyan S, Thyagarajan SP. Antiviral properties of the seed extracts of an Indian medicinal plant, Pongamia pinnata, Linn., against herpes simplex virus: in vitro studies on Vero cells. J Med Microbial. 1993;38:262–264. doi: 10.1099/00222615-38-4-262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jaccard P. Nouvelles rescherches sur la distribution florale. Bulletin de la Société vaudoise des sciences naturelles. 1908;44:223–270. [Google Scholar]
  8. Kalayasiri P, Jayashke N, Krisnangkura K. Survey of seed oils for use as diesel fuels. J Am Oil Chem Soc. 1996;73:471–474. doi: 10.1007/BF02523921. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Karmee SK, Chadha A. Preparation of biodiesel from crude oil of Pongamia pinnata. Bioresour Technol. 2005;96:1425–1429. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2004.12.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kaushik N, Kumar S, Kumar K, Beniwal R, Kaushik N, Roy S. Genetic variability and association studies in pod and seed traits of Pongamia pinnata (L.) Pierre in Haryana, India. Genet Res Crop Evol. 2007;54:1827–1832. doi: 10.1007/s10722-006-9204-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kesari V, Rangan L. Development of Pongamia pinnata as an alternative biofuel crop—current status and scope of plantations in India. J Crop Sci Biotechnol. 2010;13:127–137. doi: 10.1007/s12892-010-0064-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kesari V, Madurai V, Sathyanarayana Parida A, Rangan L. Molecular marker-based characterization in candidate plus trees of Pongamia pinnata, a potential biodiesel legume. AoB Plants. 2010 doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plq017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Krisnangkura K. A simple method for estimation of cetane index of vegetable oil methyl esters. J Am Oil Chem Soc. 1986;63:552–553. doi: 10.1007/BF02645752. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lakshmikanthan V. Tree borne oil seeds. Mumbai: Directorate of non edible oils and soap industries, Khadi and Village Industries Commission; 1978. p. 10. [Google Scholar]
  15. Martini N, Shell JS, editors. Plant oils as fuels—present state of science and future development. Berlin: Springer; 1998. [Google Scholar]
  16. Mukta N, Murthy IYLN, Sripal P. Variability assessment in Pongamia pinnata (L.) Pierre germplasm for biodiesel traits. Ind Crops Prod. 2009;29:536–540. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2008.10.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Naik M, Meher LC, Naik SN, Das LM. Production of biodiesel from high free fatty acid Karanja (Pongamia pinnata) oil. Biomass Bioenergy. 2008;32:354–357. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.10.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Pavela R. Effectiveness of some botanical insecticides against Spodoptera littoralis boisduvala (Lepidoptera: Noctudiae), Myzus persicae Sulzer (Hemiptera: Aphididae) and Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) Plant Prot Sci. 2009;45:161–167. [Google Scholar]
  19. Pavithra HR, Gowda B, Prasann KT, Shivanna MV. Pod and seed traits in candidate plus trees of Pongamia pinnata (L.) Pierre from southern peninsular India in relation to provenance variation and genetic variability. J Crop Sci Biotechnol. 2013;16:131–142. doi: 10.1007/s12892-012-0052-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Pavithra HR, Shivanna MB, Chandrika K, Prasanna KT, Gowda B. Genetic analysis of Pongamia pinnata (L.) Pierre populations using AFLP markers. Tree Genet Genomes. 2014;10:173–188. doi: 10.1007/s11295-013-0674-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Perrier X, Jacquemoud-Collet JP (2006) DARwin software, Version 5.0.158. http://darwin.cirad.fr/darwin
  22. Sahoo D, Aparajita S, Rout G. Inter and intra-population variability of Pongamia pinnata: a bioenergy legume tree. Plant Syst Evol. 2010;285:121–125. doi: 10.1007/s00606-009-0254-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Sarkar AK, Deb DL. Micronutrient cation extracting ability of some improved rice cultivars. J Ind Soc Soil Sci. 1984;32:115–119. [Google Scholar]
  24. Scott PT, Pregelj L, Chen N, Hadler JS, Djordjevic MA, Gresshoff PM. Pongamia pinnata: an untapped resource for the biofuels industry of the future. Bioenergy Res. 2008;1:2–11. doi: 10.1007/s12155-008-9003-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Sharma SS, Negi MS, Sinha P, Kumar K, Tripathi SB. Assessment of genetic diversity of biodiesel species Pongamia pinnata accessions using AFLP and three endonuclease-AFLP. Plant Mol Biol Rep. 2011;29:12–18. doi: 10.1007/s11105-010-0204-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Sharma SS, Aadil K, Negi MS, TripathI SB. Efficacy of two dominant marker systems, ISSR and TE-AFLP for assessment of genetic diversity in biodiesel species Pongamia pinnata. Curr Sci. 2014;106:1576–1580. [Google Scholar]
  27. Sharma SS, Islam MA, Negi MS, Tripathi SB. Changes in oil content and fatty acid profiles during seed development in Pongamia pinnata (L.) Pierre. Ind J Plant Physiol. 2015 [Google Scholar]
  28. Shivanna MB, Rajakumar N. Ethno-medico-botanical knowledge of rural folk in Bhadravathi taluk of Shimoga district, Karanataka. Ind J Tradit Knowl. 2010;9:158–162. [Google Scholar]
  29. Sunil N, Kumar V, Sivaraj N, Lavanya C, Prasad RBN, Rao BVSK, Varaprasad KS. Variability and divergence in Pongamia pinnata (L.) Pierre germplasm—a candidate tree for biodiesel. GCB Bioenergy. 2009;1:382–391. doi: 10.1111/j.1757-1707.2009.01030.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Tewari DN. Report of the committee on development of Bio-fuel. New Delhi: Planning Commission, Government of India; 2003. [Google Scholar]
  31. Thies W. Rapid and easy analysis of fatty acid composition in individual rapeseed cotyledons. Z Pflanzenzhchtg. 1971;65:181–202. [Google Scholar]
  32. Thudi M, Revathi M, Wani SP, Tatikonda L, Hoisington DA, Varshney RK. Analysis of genetic diversity in Pongamia [Pongamia pinnata (L.) Pierre] using AFLP markers. J Plant Biochem Biotechnol. 2010;19:209–216. doi: 10.1007/BF03263342. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. van der Wurff AWG, Chan YL, van Straalen NM, Schouten J. TE-AFLP: combining rapidity and robustness in DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28:e105. doi: 10.1093/nar/28.24.e105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES