Abstract
Aerographite (AG) is a novel carbon-based material that exists as a self-supportive 3D network of interconnected hollow microtubules. It can be synthesized in a variety of architectures tailored by the growth conditions. This flexibility in creating structures presents interesting bioengineering possibilities such as the generation of an artificial extracellular matrix. Here we have explored the feasibility and potential of AG as a scaffold for 3D cell growth employing cyclic RGD (cRGD) peptides coupled to poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) conjugated phospholipids for surface functionalization to promote specific adhesion of fibroblast cells. Successful growth and invasion of the bulk material was followed over a period of 4 days.
Keywords: aerographite, tissue engineering, 3D scaffold, cyclic RGD, fibroblasts
Developing novel materials for tissue regeneration requires the consideration of principles of engineering and life sciences. The natural extracellular matrix (ECM) provides a network of intricate collagen fibers that arrange in filaments of 2–20 μm thickness to support cells, and guide their growth as well as their behavior.1 In order to imitate this topographical environment naturally derived and synthetic materials have been explored that are beginning to show notable progress.2−5 More recently, free-standing 3D scaffolds are increasingly favored over 2D materials to more accurately mimic the complex 3D cellular environment.4−7 Early work has shown promising results using microfiber constructs for organ reconstruction8 and neuronal regeneration in animal models.9
The macroscopic geometry is a key element in providing spatial organization for cell growth and appropriate nutritional conditions. Supplying oxygen and nutrients as well as waste removal by diffusion present growth constraints for cells in 3D. Thus, a conducive environment for cell growth and proliferation will be contingent on material porosity, pore size and interconnectivity of pores that allow cell migration and mass transport. The minimum pore size might be approximated by the diameter of cells in suspension, which depends on the cell type and varies broadly from 5 to 15 μm for fibroblasts of connective tissue up to 100–350 μm for bone.10
To mimic the ECM biochemically, cell-adhesive ligands, which are presented by the natural ECM in the form of fibronectin, vitronectin, and laminin, have to be included in the scaffold design.1 These ligands recruit cell surface receptors of the integrin-family, which play an active role in biochemical and mechanical signaling.11 A common motif of integrin-binding sites in fibronectin, vitronectin and laminin is the tripeptide RGD of the l-amino acids arginin (R), glycine (G), and aspartic acid (D). It is widely used in synthetic materials to promote adhesion of a variety of cells.12−14
Ultralightweight aerographite15,16 (AG) inherently fulfills the geometrical requirements posed by natural ECM very well. This novel material consists of a self-supporting highly porous (>99.9% free volume) network of seamlessly interconnected hollow graphite tubes with micrometer-scale diameters and mechanical flexibility (kPa modulus). Via surface functionalization, various biochemical signals may be introduced to provide appropriate conditions for 3D mammalian cell culture applications. In this study we investigated the use of AG as a scaffold for 3D cell growth for the first time. We employed cyclic RGD (cRGD) peptides coupled to poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) conjugated phospholipids to promote specific adhesion of REF52 fibroblast cells and followed cell growth and invasion into the bulk material over a period of 4 days.
Conventional methods to fabricate 3D fibrous matrices include the decellularization of donor-derived matrices17 and electrospinning methods.18 AG synthesis,15 in contrast, is a one-step chemical vapor deposition (CVD) process. In brief, ZnO templates (Figure 1A, top panel) are produced from a loose powder of microsized ZnO tetra- and multipods that are compressed and heated for 3h at 1200 °C.19 Under an argon and hydrogen atmosphere with toluene as a carbon source the templates are converted into AG at ∼760 °C. During deposition and formation of tubular graphitic carbon the underlying ZnO network is reduced to elemental Zn and removed entirely by the gas flow, resulting in a black opaque material (Figure 1A, bottom panel). An injection rate of 6 mL/h per g(ZnO) yielded sample densities of 1.0–1.2 mg/cm3 and a Young’s modulus of about 1 kPa.
Because the conversion process follows the template exactly, the resultant scaffold exhibits the same architecture and porosity. Hence, pore size and macroscopic shape of AG can be freely tailored through manipulating the template. By adjusting CVD parameters it is possible to tune filament diameter, thickness and aspect ratio and yield elastic moduli from 1 kPa up to several 100 kPa,15 which allows for a multitude of bioengineering possibilities.20
AG scaffolds in this study exhibited pore sizes varying from 10 μm to about 100 μm and filaments with diameters between 0.5 and 3 μm (Figure 1B), which compares well with natural ECM.1 Other carbon-based templates, such as graphene-foams21 or graphene oxide scaffolds22 lack the fibrous nature and form much larger pores. Capillary force induced restructuring of carbon nanotube-based networks, on the other hand, leads to confined cavities that are not accessible from all sides,23 whereas AG provides interconnected pores that afford penetrability and accessibility of all surfaces. In addition, the combination of ultralightweight and negligible volume fraction may prove advantageous for cells. After initial attachment to the scaffold, ECM producing cells may restructure and remodel their environment according to their adhesion needs through deposition of natural ECM. At the same time the hierarchical architecture of AG is able to withstand strong deformations making AG networks mechanically flexible.15
However, the application of AG in the biomedical field is initially hampered by its superhydrophobic nature (Figure 1C). To overcome this barrier, noncovalent functionalization schemes using amphiphilic molecules can be very attractive, as they do not require elaborate chemical modification that may alter the surface composition. Moreover, as pharmaceutical products often contain surfactants, a comprehensive library of approved agents is already available. In this study, we tested different agents (Supporting Information) including lipid–poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG-lipid) to improve the immersion properties of AG. In that regard the open mostly unconstrained interconnected pore space in AG should facilitate wetting of all surfaces within the bulk of the material. Amine terminated PEG conjugated phospholipid (DSPE-PEG2000-NH2) yielded immediate and complete immersion of AG at a surfactant concentration of 1 mg/mL in distilled water (Figure 1C). PEG-lipids are widely used in medical products24 and have been shown to successfully disperse various carbon based materials in aqueous media.25 The hydrophobic alkyl chains of the lipid part adsorbs onto the strongly hydrophobic surface of the carbon material, whereas PEG extends into the aqueous phase to impart hydrophilicity.24 Immersed samples were subjected to vacuum treatment to remove all air out from the bulk and ensure wetting of all surfaces.
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed to verify adsorption of PEG-lipids on the outer surface of the filaments (Figure 2). AG samples were dehydrated by super critical point drying (CPD) to avoid the destructive effect of surface tension on the network during evaporation of the liquid and a thin layer of gold was applied to improve visualization of biomolecules on the graphitic filaments. The PEG-lipids became visible at high magnification as bright dots (Figure 2B, C), and were found to decorate the surface as a dense and homogeneous monolayer of individual molecules. Control experiments with gold-coated pristine AG confirmed that the observed nanostructures were not artifacts of the coating procedure (Figure 2E).
Amine terminated PEG-lipids offer several advantages: long-chain PEG conveys inertness to the surfaces and prevents nonspecific binding of cells and proteins. The amine can be used for standard coupling of ligands, antibodies or therapeutic molecules to introduce specific functionalities, such as integrin mediated cell adhesion. Here we used cyclic RGD (cRGD) as ligand for the αvβ3 integrin in the plasma membrane of rat embryo fibroblasts (REF52). Fibroblasts were chosen in this pilot study, because this cell type synthesizes and deposits ECM to create an environment best suited to their function.7 AG scaffolds were functionalized with a 4:1 mixture of DSPE-PEG2000-NH2:DSPE-PEG2000-cRGD (Figure 2D). Assuming a uniform mixing of both types of PEG-lipids and taking into account a length of 9 nm for fully extended PEG2000, a ratio of 4:1 would yield a maximum spacing of integrin binding cRGD-sites of 45 nm. This is well within the range of distances that promote attachment and stable formation of focal adhesions by REF52 fibroblasts.26
REF52 were cultured for 4 days, then fixed with paraformaldehyde and prepared for SEM imaging by CPD. A thin layer of gold was applied for visualization of cells within the scaffolds and reduction of the destructive influence of the electron beam on biological samples. SEM images of fibroblasts near the surface of the AG bulk material (Figure 3) revealed the typical polygonal cell shape with elongated cytoplasm projections attaching to the scaffold. Images at higher magnification (Figure 3C,D) showed contact formation of the plasma membrane with the AG surface indicating the ability of cRGD functionalized AG to promote integrin mediated specific cell adhesion. The viability of cells upon exposure to pristine and DSPE-PEG2000-NH2 functionalized AG was tested according to the norm ISO 10993, which proposes standardized conditions for biological evaluation of medical devices and materials. In particular, assay protocols outlined in parts 5 (ISO 10993–5:2009) and 12 (ISO 10993–12:2004) of this norm were applied. Briefly, REF52 cells were cultured for 24 h in extract medium that had been incubated with AG and PEG-lipid conjugated AG at 37 °C for 72 h. To determine cell viability the colorimetric MTT metabolic activity assay was used with cells incubated in untreated medium as negative control and cells incubated in 15% DMSO as positive control (Figure 3E). The results were normalized to the viability of the negative control and show neither a negative effect of functionalized AG nor pristine AG on REF 52 cells.
Next, we explored the colonization depth within AG scaffolds using inherently fluorescent REF52 cells, which express YFP-paxillin. Paxillin is mainly located in the focal contacts formed by fibroblast upon adhesion (Figure 4A). Despite the extreme low density and open porous structure, AG scaffolds are opaque and have tremendous light absorbing capacities.15 Thus, fluorescence imaging proved most challenging and required extended illumination times of up to 5 s/frame. Optical image stacks were recorded up to a maximum penetration depth of 300 μm from the surface. Figure 4B shows an optical section image taken approximately 100 μm from the surface of an AG scaffold. In the image AG filaments are well visible as black fibers, as they absorbed all emitted light; fluorescence signals from embedded cells indicate progressive growth into the matrix. Figures 4C, D compare actin (red) and paxillin (green) distributions on 2D glass and in 3D AG. On a 2D substrate, actin assembles in stress fibers, and separate focal adhesion sites are clearly visible. In 3D, paxillin clusters are much smaller and actin forms more of a mesh. This is in agreement with previous studies that have shown that adhesion structures are quite different in 2D and 3D.6,27−29
Because of the obvious limitations of fluorescence microscopy due to the optical properties of AG, we prepared histological sections for bright-field microscopy. The samples were dehydrated, embedded in paraffin, and sections of 9 μm thickness were cut from the surface down to about half the sample height at 1.5 mm (see also Figure S4–S6). To visualize the embedded cells, we applied hematoxylin and eosin (HE) stain that color cell nuclei in blue and eosinophilic structures in the cytosol in shades of red and pink. AG scaffold fragments clearly show association with intact cells (Figure 4F–I). Through screening of all sections from multiple scaffolds we determined colonization depths of up to 580 μm. Higher-magnification images revealed fibroblasts of normal morphologies that were well interfaced with AG fragments (Figures 3F–L) and stretched out or spanned between adjacent filaments, in accordance with our observation from SEM.
In summary, we demonstrated the capacity of biofunctionalized AG as a novel ultra lightweight graphitic material to provide a scaffold conducive to directed three-dimensional cell growth. Cells were able to adhere, extend leading edges and elongate along the fibers of the matrix. The great advantages of AG compared to other porous 3D scaffolds are its extremely high porosity and the opportunity to tune the elastic modulus to accommodate different types of tissues.20 Together with the material’s excellent electrical properties (conductivity ∼1 S/m) AG may prove very promising for applications where guidance cues and electrical conductivity within a 3D environment are vital for cell proliferation and stimulation, e.g., in cardiac tissue engineering30,31 or regeneration of neural activity.32 Thus, our findings commend AG with its extensive possibilities of tailoring for further investigations of other tissue engineering and bioapplications.
Acknowledgments
This project was funded by the European Union’s Framework Programme 7 (2007-2013) under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie Grant Agreement 330418. In addition, C.S. acknowledges funding from the European Research Council under ERC Starting Grant no. 336104. R.A., I.P., and A.S acknowledge support through German Research Foundation (DFG) grant AD 183/17-1. M.M. and K.S. received funding through the DFG SFB 986 M3 project B1. and M.T. was supported by the Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst (DAAD) through a research grant for doctoral candidates (91526555-57048249). We gratefully acknowledge the help of Brook Shurtleff with English editing.
Glossary
Abbreviations
- AG
aerographite
- CVD
chemical vapor deposition
- CPD
super critical point drying
- cRGD
cyclic RGD
- DSPE-PEG2000-NH2
2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine-N-[amine(PEG)2000]
- ECM
extra cellular matrix
- PEG
poly(ethylene glycol)
- SEM
scanning electron microscopy
Supporting Information Available
The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acsami.6b00778.
Materials and Methods, test series using different surfactants for AG immersion, additional SEM images of functionalized AG without Au coating and pristine AG with Au coating, images of paraffin embedded AG, and corresponding thin sections of three types of AG with different specific weight (PDF)
Author Present Address
# C.L. is currently at Institute of Biophysics, Johannes Kepler University Linz, 4020 Linz, Austria
Author Contributions
The manuscript was written through contributions of all authors. All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript.
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
Supplementary Material
References
- Alberts B.; Johnson A.; Lewis J.; Raff M.; Roberts K.; Walter P.. The Extracellular Matrix of Animals. In Molecular Biology of the Cell, 4th ed.; Alberts B, Johnson A, Lewis J, Raff M, Roberts K., Walter P.., Eds.; Garland Science: New York, 2002; Chapter 19. [Google Scholar]
- Perez R. A.; Won J.-E.; Knowles J. C.; Kim H.-W. Naturally and Synthetic Smart Composite Biomaterials for Tissue Regeneration. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 2013, 65 (4), 471–496. 10.1016/j.addr.2012.03.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lutolf M. P.; Hubbell J. A. Synthetic Biomaterials as Instructive Extracellular Microenvironments for Morphogenesis in Tissue Engineering. Nat. Biotechnol. 2005, 23 (1), 47–55. 10.1038/nbt1055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zorlutuna P.; Annabi N.; Camci-Unal G.; Nikkhah M.; Cha J. M.; Nichol J. W.; Manbachi A.; Bae H.; Chen S.; Khademhosseini A. Microfabricated Biomaterials for Engineering 3D Tissues. Adv. Mater. 2012, 24 (14), 1782–1804. 10.1002/adma.201104631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bajaj P.; Schweller R. M.; Khademhosseini A.; West J. L.; Bashir R. 3D Biofabrication Strategies for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2014, 16, 247–276. 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071813-105155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cukierman E.; Pankov R.; Yamada K. M. Cell Interactions with Three-dimensional Matrices. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2002, 14 (5), 633–639. 10.1016/S0955-0674(02)00364-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grinnell F. Fibroblast Biology in Three-dimensional Collagen Matrices. Trends Cell Biol. 2003, 13 (5), 264–269. 10.1016/S0962-8924(03)00057-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Oberpenning F.; Meng J.; Yoo J. J.; Atala A. De Novo Reconstitution of a Functional Mammalian Urinary Bladder by Tissue Engineering. Nat. Biotechnol. 1999, 17 (2), 149–155. 10.1038/6146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Park K. I.; Teng Y. D.; Snyder E. Y. The injured brain interacts reciprocally with neural stem cells supported by scaffolds to reconstitute lost tissue. Nat. Biotechnol. 2002, 20 (11), 1111–1117. 10.1038/nbt751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang S. F.; Leong K. F.; Du Z. H.; Chua C. K. The Design of Scaffolds for Use in Tissue Engineering. Part 1. Traditional Factors. Tissue Eng. 2001, 7 (6), 679–689. 10.1089/107632701753337645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van der Flier A.; Sonnenberg A. Function and Interactions of Integrins. Cell Tissue Res. 2001, 305 (3), 285–298. 10.1007/s004410100417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hersel U.; Dahmen C.; Kessler H. RGD Modified Polymers: Biomaterials for Stimulated Cell Adhesion and Beyond. Biomaterials 2003, 24 (24), 4385–4415. 10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00343-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rahmany M. B.; Van Dyke M. Biomimetic Approaches to Modulate Cellular Adhesion in Biomaterials: A Review. Acta Biomater. 2013, 9 (3), 5431–5437. 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.11.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Battista E.; Causa F.; Lettera V.; Panzetta V.; Guarnieri D.; Fusco S.; Gentile F.; Netti P. A. Ligand Engagement on Material Surfaces is Discriminated by Cell Mechanosensoring. Biomaterials 2015, 45, 72–80. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.12.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mecklenburg M.; Schuchardt A.; Mishra Y. K.; Kaps S.; Adelung R.; Lotnyk A.; Kienle L.; Schulte K. Aerographite: Ultra Lightweight, Flexible Nanowall, Carbon Microtube Material with Outstanding Mechanical Performance. Adv. Mater. 2012, 24 (26), 3486–3490. 10.1002/adma.201200491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schuchardt A.; Braniste T.; Mishra Y. K.; Deng M.; Mecklenburg M.; Stevens-Kalceff M. A.; Raevschi S.; Schulte K.; Kienle L.; Adelung R.; Tiginyanu I. Three-dimensional Aerographite-GaN Hybrid Networks: Single Step Fabrication of Porous and Mechanically Flexible Materials for Multifunctional Applications. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 8839. 10.1038/srep08839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Crapo P. M.; Gilbert T. W.; Badylak S. F. An Overview of Tissue and Whole Organ Decellularization Processes. Biomaterials 2011, 32 (12), 3233–3243. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sill T. J.; von Recum H. A. Electrospinning: Applications in Drug Delivery and Tissue Engineering. Biomaterials 2008, 29 (13), 1989–2006. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.01.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mishra Y. K.; Kaps S.; Schuchardt A.; Paulowicz I.; Jin X.; Gedamu D.; Freitag S.; Claus M.; Wille S.; Kovalev A.; Gorb S. N.; Adelung R. Fabrication of Macroscopically Flexible and Highly Porous 3D Semiconductor Networks from Interpenetrating Nanostructures by a Simple Flame Transport Approach. Part. Part. Syst. Charact. 2013, 30 (9), 775–783. 10.1002/ppsc.201300197. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Seidi A.; Ramalingam M.; Elloumi-Hannachi I.; Ostrovidov S.; Khademhosseini A. Gradient biomaterials for soft-to-hard interface tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 2011, 7 (4), 1441–51. 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.01.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li N.; Zhang Q.; Gao S.; Song Q.; Huang R.; Wang L.; Liu L.; Dai J.; Tang M.; Cheng G. Three-dimensional Graphene Foam as a Biocompatible and Conductive Scaffold for Neural Stem Cells. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 1604. 10.1038/srep01604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Serrano M. C.; Patino J.; Garcia-Rama C.; Ferrer M. L.; Fierro J. L. G.; Tamayo A.; Collazos-Castro J. E.; del Monte F.; Gutierrez M. C. 3D Free-standing Porous Scaffolds Made of Graphene Oxide as Substrates for Neural Cell Growth. J. Mater. Chem. B 2014, 2 (34), 5698–5706. 10.1039/C4TB00652F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Correa-Duarte M. A.; Wagner N.; Rojas-Chapana J.; Morsczeck C.; Thie M.; Giersig M. Fabrication and Biocompatibility of Carbon Nanotube-based 3D Networks as Scaffolds for Cell Seeding and Growth. Nano Lett. 2004, 4 (11), 2233–2236. 10.1021/nl048574f. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Knop K.; Hoogenboom R.; Fischer D.; Schubert U. S. Poly(ethylene glycol) in Drug Delivery: Pros and Cons as Well as Potential Alternatives. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49 (36), 6288–6308. 10.1002/anie.200902672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang M.; Wada M.; Zhang M.; Kostarelos K.; Yuge R.; Iijima S.; Masuda M.; Yudasaka M. A High Poly(ethylene glycol) Density on Graphene Nanomaterials Reduces the Detachment of Lipid–poly(ethylene glycol) and Macrophage Uptake. Acta Biomater. 2013, 9 (1), 4744–4753. 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.09.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cavalcanti-Adam E. A.; Volberg T.; Micoulet A.; Kessler H.; Geiger B.; Spatz J. P. Cell Spreading and Focal Adhesion Dynamics are Regulated by Spacing of Integrin Ligands. Biophys. J. 2007, 92 (8), 2964–2974. 10.1529/biophysj.106.089730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baker B. M.; Chen C. S. Deconstructing the third dimension - how 3D culture microenvironments alter cellular cues. J. Cell Sci. 2012, 125 (13), 3015–3024. 10.1242/jcs.079509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cukierman E.; Pankov R.; Stevens D. R.; Yamada K. M. Taking cell-matrix adhesions to the third dimension. Science 2001, 294 (5547), 1708–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kubow K. E.; Horwitz A. R. Reducing background fluorescence reveals adhesions in 3D matrices (vol 13, pg 3, 2011). Nat. Cell Biol. 2012, 14 (12), 1344. 10.1038/ncb2630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dvir T.; Timko B. P.; Brigham M. D.; Naik S. R.; Karajanagi S. S.; Levy O.; Jin H. W.; Parker K. K.; Langer R.; Kohane D. S. Nanowired Three-dimensional Cardiac Patches. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2011, 6 (11), 720–725. 10.1038/nnano.2011.160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ganji Y.; Li Q.; Quabius E. S.; Böttner M.; Selhuber-Unkel C.; Kasra M. Cardiomyocyte Behavior on Biodegradable Polyurethane/Gold Nanocomposite Scaffolds Under Electrical Stimulation. Mater. Sci. Eng., C 2016, 59, 10–18. 10.1016/j.msec.2015.09.074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fabbro A.; Villari A.; Laishram J.; Scaini D.; Toma F. M.; Turco A.; Prato M.; Ballerini L. Spinal Cord Explants Use Carbon Nanotube Interfaces To Enhance Neurite Outgrowth and To Fortify Synaptic Inputs. ACS Nano 2012, 6 (3), 2041–2055. 10.1021/nn203519r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.