Skip to main content
Taylor & Francis Open Select logoLink to Taylor & Francis Open Select
. 2015 Oct 22;186(8):1316–1326. doi: 10.1080/03004430.2015.1092141

Longitudinal effects of a two-generation preschool programme on receptive language skill in low-income Canadian children to age 10 years

Muhammad Kashif Mughal a, Carla S Ginn a, Robert L Perry b, Karen M Benzies a,*
PMCID: PMC4940896  PMID: 27453625

ABSTRACT

We explored longitudinal effects of a two-generation preschool programme on receptive language scores in children (n = 78) at age 10 years, living with low income. Scores at four time-points, programme intake, exit, age 7, and age 10 years were measured using the Peabody picture vocabulary test (3rd ed.). Effects of culture (Aboriginal, other Canadian-born, and recent immigrant), and gender of the children were explored. Between programme intake and age 10, scores improved significantly, F(3, 75) = 21.11, p < .0005. There were significant differences among cultural groups at all time-points except age 10. Scores differed significantly for girls, but not boys, at age 10, F = 5.11, p = .01. Recent immigrant boys reached the Canadian average, while girls were two-thirds of the standard deviation below average. Early intervention programmes must include a focus on the unique circumstances of recent immigrant girls; supportive transition workers in schools are one recommendation.

KEYWORDS: Preschool children, family, poverty, cross-cultural comparison


More than 25% of children living in Canada have delayed development at school entry (Alberta Education, 2014), leading to difficulties with lifelong learning and health. The gradient effect of poverty on children's risk for developmental delay puts children in the poorest families most at risk (Hertzman & Boyce, 2010). Poverty in Canada has not been officially defined, but includes the inability to obtain the necessities of life such as food, clothing, shelter, and transportation (Collin & Campbell, 2008). Low income is more clearly defined, and is less than half the low-income cut-off (LICO), or when a family spends 20% more of its annual budget on food, shelter, and clothing than the average Canadian family (Statistics Canada, 20112012). The LICO for an urban-dwelling family of four before tax was $36,107 in 2002 and $43,942 in 2012 (Statistics Canada, 20112012). There are an increasing number of families in Canada living with low income, and children in these families experience innumerable disadvantages.

Children living with low income are likely to experience detrimental long-term effects on behaviour, cognitive development, emotional and physical health, and school achievement (Brooks-Gunn & Duncan, 1997; Spencer, Thanh, & Louise, 2013). Economic disparities begin prenatally (Oliver & Hayes, 2005), and are sustained through lower parental education, unemployment, and living in a risky neighbourhood (McEwen & Stewart, 2014; Oliver & Hayes, 2005). Lack of cognitive stimulation and unresponsive parent–child interactions negatively affect brain development (Hackman, Farah, & Meaney, 2010). Exposure to abuse and neglect affects learning, behaviour, and health through sustained activation of the body's stress response system, with lifelong effects (Fox, Levitt, & Nelson, 2010; Shonkoff & Garner, 2012). In contrast, early positive experiences such as reciprocal ‘serve and return’ interactions with parents, family members, and primary caregivers build healthy brain architecture (Fox et al., 2010). Two-generation, early intervention programmes are one strategy to effect positive change in children's environments, promoting school readiness, and contributing to child and family well-being (Anthony, King, & Austin, 2011). School readiness is the ability to respond adequately in cognitive-academic and social-emotional-behavioural ways to the demands of a school setting (Carlton & Winsler, 1999). School readiness improves children's self-efficacy, motivation, and resilience; increases achievement of healthy behaviour; and is a reliable marker for later health and success (Pagani & Fitzpatrick, 2013). Receptive language is a proxy measure of school readiness (Ryan, Fauth, & Brooks-Gunn, 2013), and school readiness is negatively affected by low income.

Considerations of culture

We compared children of three cultural groups at CUPS One World: Aboriginal (First Nations, Métis, or Inuit), other Canadian-born, and recent immigrant (within 10 years at study intake). Aboriginal people are strong and resilient, with a holistic world view that has the potential to contribute to the overall health and well-being of all Canadians (Kirmayer, Simpson, & Cargo, 2003; National Collaborating Centre for Aboriginal Health, 2013). Colonisation produced unimaginable adversity through the residential school system (Knopf, 2008), and intergenerational effects of this forced assimilation have affected individual as well as collective health (Waldram, Herring, & Young, 2006). Compared with other Canadians, Aboriginal people have lower life expectancies and education levels combined with higher rates of poverty, incarceration, family violence, crowded living conditions, accidents, homicides, addictions, major depression, history of sexual abuse in childhood, chronic disease, infectious disease, obesity, maternal morbidity and mortality, infant and young child mortality, food insecurity, malnutrition, stunted growth, and suicide rates (Mikkonen & Raphael, 2010; National Collaborating Centre for Aboriginal Health, 2013; Tjepkema, 2002; Tjepkema, Wilkins, Senecal, Guimond, & Penney, 2009; Wilkins, Houle, Berthelot, & Ross, 2000). Aboriginal people make up 4.3% of Canada's population (Statistics Canada, 2013a), are growing six times faster than the non-Aboriginal population, and are younger, with half under 24 years of age (The Environics Institute, 2012). Of Canadian children age 14 years and under in government care, a disproportionate number (48%) are Aboriginal (Statistics Canada, 2013a). Aboriginal children are more likely to experience poorer health than other Canadian-born children, and to achieve developmental language outcomes later (Findlay, Kohen, & Miller, 2014).

Canadian-born children living in low-income families are at risk of ineffective parenting, stress, and family dysfunction (Beiser et al., 2011). In 2002, 10% of urban-dwelling families of four lived below the LICO (Vanier Institute of the Family, 2008); in 2006, this increased to 12.8% (Statistics Canada, 2006), and is presently 14.9% (Statistics Canada, 20112012). Of Canadian children who live in one-parent families headed by mothers, 39% live with low income (Vanier Institute of the Family, 2008).

Recent immigrants are more likely to be living in poverty and with low social support than other Canadian families (Séguin et al., 2012; Van Hulst, Séguin, Zunzunegui, Vélez, & Nikiéma, 2011). Foreign-born children are more likely to experience poverty than Canadian-born children, but with fewer emotional and behavioural health problems than other Canadian-born children in poverty (Beiser et al., 2011). Although strong family support contributes positively to healthy development of immigrant children, they also require concrete academic support in order to achieve academic success (Este & Van Ngo, 2011). Immigrant children experience more stressors than other children, which are compounded during adolescence, with increased potential for involvement in gangs, criminal activity, violent behaviour, and drug and alcohol use (Este & Van Ngo, 2011). Foreign-born people make up 20.6% of Canada's population, and 19.2% of immigrants are children under the age of 14 years (Statistics Canada, 2013b).

Considerations of gender

Male gender is a risk factor for speech and language delay in preschool children (Nelson, Nygren, Walker, & Panoscha, 2006). Typically, girls surpass boys in vocabulary skills up to age 12 years, reflecting earlier maturation and capacity (Bornstein & Haynes, 1998; Hayiou-Thomas, Dale, & Plomin, 2012).

Research purpose and questions

The purpose of this study is to determine the longitudinal effects of a two-generation preschool programme on children's receptive language to age 10 years. The research questions are as follows: (a) were the effects of a two-generation preschool programme on child receptive language scores sustained up to age 10 years; (b) do these effects vary by culture (Aboriginal, other Canadian-born, and recent immigrant); (c) do these effects vary by gender; and (d) do these effects vary by gender within cultural groups?

Methods

Participants

Between December 2002 (programme start) and October 2008, 134 children and 79 caregivers participated in the study. Eligibility for the two-generation programme at CUPS One World included low income, and one or more risks for developmental delay such as parental mental illness, addiction, and lack of social support. Eligibility for the longitudinal follow-up study included enrolment in the programme for at least three consecutive months. Eligibility criteria for the programme and the present study are described fully in previous publications (Benzies et al., 2010, 2012). This longitudinal study was approved by the University of Calgary Conjoint Health Research Ethics Board (E ID #17566).

Follow-up data were available for 112 children at programme exit, 73 children at age 7 years, and 62 children at age 10 years. At age 10 years, we observed a significant difference in culture, with more recent immigrants participating than the other two cultural groups, concurring with findings at age 7 years (Benzies et al., 2012). At age 10 years, the sample comprised 27% Aboriginal, 37% other Canadian-born, and 36% recent immigrant children; most attrition at the age 10 follow-up occurred in the Aboriginal group, which decreased from 34% at intake to 27% at age 10 years. There were no significant differences in caregiver age, marital status, or child gender between those who participated in the study at age 10 years and those who did not. However, there was a significant difference in parental education at age 10 years, with parents who completed high school more likely to participate in the follow-up than those who did not. At age 7 years, there were no differences in parental education for those who completed the follow-up study and those who did not (Benzies et al., 2012).

The two-generation preschool programme

Calgary Urban Project Society (CUPS) Health Education and Housing Centres offers multiple programmes and services to facilitate resiliency in low-income families in Calgary, AB, Canada (CUPS Health and Education, 2010). CUPS One World Child Development Centre (hereafter referred to as CUPS One World) is a two-generation preschool programme that promotes school readiness and early childhood development through strengthening children's proximal environmental resources, providing access to centre-based early learning, and increasing parental psychosocial resources (Benzies et al., 2012). Children attend four days per week, five hours per day, with year-round programming, bussing, and provision of breakfast, lunch, and snacks. The curriculum builds on children's interests to motivate learning, teacher/child ratios are 1:8, and caregivers are encouraged to participate fully in children's classroom and recreational activities. Preschool teachers and social workers visit each home several times per year. Access to community health nurses, pediatricians, dental, vision, and hearing screenings is ensured. Caregivers attend a six-week series of parenting and life skills classes. CUPS One World is a clinical practicum site for students from nursing, social work, and early childhood education. Details of the parent education and family support components of the two-generation programme are described fully in another publication (Benzies et al., 2009).

Measurement

The Peabody picture vocabulary test (3rd ed.) (PPVT III) is an age-standardised, norm-referenced, observational measure of receptive vocabulary for individuals aged 2.5 to over 90 years (Dunn & Dunn, 1997). There are 204 test items grouped into 17 sets of 12 items each. Each item consists of four black-and-white illustrations on a page (picture plate) arranged in order of increasing difficulty. The test-taker must select the picture that best represents the meaning of a word read by the examiner, and most individuals complete five sets, or 60 items. A raw score is obtained by subtracting the number of errors from the total ceiling score; higher scores indicate better receptive vocabulary. Raw scores can be converted to age-referenced normative scores such as standard scores, percentiles, stanines, normal curve equivalents, and age equivalents. The PPVT III correlates well with other measures of vocabulary, and moderately well with other tests of verbal ability (Dunn & Dunn, 1997). Test–retest reliability ranges from .88 to .96 and Cronbach's α from .92 to .98. The PPVT III is simple to administer, is untimed, and can be completed in 11–12 minutes. We used PPVT III standard scores for this study.

Procedures

Caregivers of children consented to participate, and with children's assent, receptive language testing was conducted by trained research staff. While the child attended CUPS One World, receptive language testing was completed at the centre. At age 7 and 10 years, families were contacted by letter, phone, email, or Facebook (www.facebook.com; Mychasiuk & Benzies, 2012), and visited at home as close as possible to their child's birthdays. FaceTime (https://www.facebook.com/applefacetime) was used to complete receptive language testing with the children of one family living in an isolated area.

Data imputation and analyses

Ideally, children in the study would have had receptive language testing using the PPVT III at programme intake, yearly while in the programme, at programme exit, age 7, and age 10 years. Therefore, some of the children had up to seven completed PPVT III tests. For the purposes of our study, if a child was missing a PPVT III score at one time-point, but had data for a minimum of three other time-points, we imputed data at one missing time point in order to retain as much of our sample as possible. We imputed nine PPVT III scores at age 7 years by calculating the means of the two adjacent scores. We imputed 19 PPVT III scores at age 10 years by calculating means of all available scores (except intake score). Of the 312 PPVT III scores in our data set, we imputed 28 (9%). After imputing, 78 children had PPVT III scores at four time-points, intake, exit, age 7, and age 10 years. Data analyses with and without imputation of scores did not alter the level of statistical significance. Correlation analyses demonstrated significant relationships between PPVT III scores at programme exit and age 7 years, and between age 7 and 10 years (see discussion). This implies that the previous PPVT III score of the child is the best predictor of their next score, confirming our process for imputation of 28 scores.

We used repeated measures to compare receptive language scores in children at four time-points. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to compare receptive language scores based on culture and gender among the three cultural groups (Aboriginal, other Canadian-born, and recent immigrant) at four time-points. A two-way between-groups ANOVA was conducted to compare the effects of receptive language scores on culture and gender. Post hoc analyses were performed using Bonferroni correction, and effect sizes were calculated using eta squared (η 2). All analyses were completed using SPSS version 22.0, with a p value < .05 considered as significant.

Results

Demographic characteristics of participants, and percentages of receptive language scores in clinical range are presented in Table 1.

Table 1. Socio-demographic characteristics and percentages of PPVT III scores in clinical range.

  Aboriginal Other Canadian-born Recent immigrant All  
Variables na Frequency (%) n Frequency (%) n Frequency (%) N Frequency (%)
Children
Gender (% male) 21 11(52) 29 15(52) 28 14(50) 78 40(51)
Child age (months) 21 129(21.7) 29 121.7(4.7) 28 120.5(3.6) 78 123.2(12.1)
PPVT III % in clinical range at intake 21 6(29) 29 6(21) 28 14(50) 78 26(33)
PPVT III % in clinical range at exit 21 4(19) 29 2(7) 28 8(29) 78 14(18)
PPVT III % in clinical range at age 7 21 4(19) 29 4(14) 28 9(32) 78 17(22)
PPVT III % in clinical range at age 10 21 2(10) 29 2(7) 28 7(25) 78 11(14)
Caregivers
Caregiver age (years) 15 39.9(7.2) 22 40.7(6.5) 18 41.4(6.2) 55 40.7(6.5)
Partnered 11 7(64) 17 11(65) 16 10(63) 44 28(64)
Completed high school 11 6(55) 20 17(85) 18 15(83) 49 38 (78)
File opened with child welfare as a child 15 10(67) 22 6(27) 18 0(0) 55 16(29)

Note: PPVT III = Peabody picture vocabulary test (3rd ed.).

aSample size varied due to missing; 78 children with 56 caregivers.

Comparison of scores to age 10 years

The effects of a two-generation preschool programme on children's receptive language scores were sustained until age 10 years. Children's receptive language scores improved significantly between intake and age 10 years, F(3, 75) = 21.11, p < .001, η 2 = .46, but no significant improvement was observed in receptive language scores between programme exit and age 7 years, or programme exit and age 10 years. This is congruent with previous results, where no significant difference was noted in receptive language scores between programme exit and age 7 years (Benzies et al., 2012). There was a slight decrease in receptive language scores from exit to age 7 years (mean difference = 1.36). At age 10 years, receptive language scores of children equalled those at programme exit (see Table 2).

Table 2. PPVT III mean scores by cultural groups at four time-points.

    Aboriginal   Other Canadian-born   Recent Immigrant   All
PPVT III scores n M (SD) n M (SD) n M (SD) N M (SD)
Intake 21 86.90(16.97) 29 95.48(14.38)a 28 80.39(17.38)a 78 87.76(17.27)*
Exit 21 98.38(13.26) 29 102.14(10.53)a 28 93.32(11.44)a 78 97.96(12.09)
Seven years 21 97.10(11.41) 29 100.76(13.22)a 28 91.93(13.74)a 78 96.60(13.35)
Ten years 21 97.90(9.18) 29 100.62(11.25) 28 95.25(12.43) 78 97.96(11.29)*

Note: PPVT III = Peabody picture vocabulary test (3rd ed.).

a Post hoc analyses showed significant differences between groups.

*p < .001.

Comparison of receptive language scores based on culture

Different effects of the two-generation preschool programme on receptive language scores were observed within three cultural groups (Aboriginal, other Canadian-born, and recent immigrant). A one-way ANOVA was conducted, demonstrating significant differences among the three cultural groups at all time-points except age 10 years. Post hoc analyses identified significant differences in receptive language scores between programme intake, exit, and age 7 years for recent immigrants and other Canadian-born children. Recent immigrant children showed the greatest improvement in receptive language scores between age 7 and age 10 years (mean increase = 3.32) (see Table 2).

Comparison of receptive language scores based on gender

Receptive language scores of boys and girls were compared at four time-points among the three cultural groups. In boys, there were no significant differences in receptive language scores at any time-point among the three groups. Girl's receptive language scores differed significantly at four time-points: intake F(2, 35) = 6.489, p < .01, η 2 = .27; exit F(2, 35) = 3.547, p = .04, η 2 = .17; age 7 years F(2, 35) = 4.988, p = .01, η 2 = .22; and age 10 years F(2, 35) = 5.115, p = .01, η 2 = .27. Post hoc analyses demonstrated significant differences in receptive language scores between other Canadian-born and recent immigrant girls at programme intake, age 7 years (p = 0.01), and age 10 years (p < .01); however, these differences were not significant at study exit (see Table 3).

Table 3. PPVT III mean scores by gender at four time-points.

  Aboriginal boys Other Canadian-born boys Recent immigrant boys Aboriginal girls Other Canadian-born girls Recent immigrant girls
PPVT III scores M (SD) M (SD) M (SD) M (SD) M (SD) M (SD)
Intake 84.64(19.06) 96.13(14.73) 86.14(17.28) 89.40(14.93) 94.79(14.52)a 74.64(16.04)a,*
Exit 97.00(12.82) 103.93(11.38) 96.43(12.50) 99.90(14.25) 100.21(9.57) 90.21(9.72)*
Seven years 100.82(11.06) 101.60(14.81) 97.86(13.20) 93.00(10.86) 99.86(11.77)a 86.00(11.93)a,*
Ten years 97.73(9.42) 98.20(9.52) 100.29(13.19) 98.10(9.42) 103.21(12.69)a 90.21(9.60)a,*

Note: PPVT III = Peabody picture vocabulary test (3rd ed.).

a Post hoc analyses showed significant differences between groups.

*p < .05.

Comparison of receptive language scores based on culture and gender

A two-way ANOVA was conducted to explore the impact of gender and culture on receptive language scores at four time-points. The interaction effect between gender and culture was statistically significant at age 10 years, F(2, 72) = 3.548, p = .03, η 2 = .09, but was not significant at any other time-points. There was a statistically significant effect of culture on receptive language scores at intake, exit, and age 7 years. Post hoc analyses indicated statistically significant receptive language scores between other Canadian-born and recent immigrant children. This effect of gender on receptive language scores was not statistically significant at intake and exit; however, it was significant at age 7 years, F(2, 72) = 6.20, p = .01, η 2 = .08.

Comparison of receptive language scores by gender within cultural groups

Receptive language scores of boys and girls were compared within each cultural group. At age 10 years, Aboriginal and other Canadian-born boys were outperformed by girls, while recent immigrant boys performed better than girls. There was a marked difference in mean scores between recent immigrant boys and girls at age 10 years; boys M = 100.29, SD = 13.19, and girls M = 90.21, SD = 9.60.

Discussion

In our study, receptive language scores were sustained to the age of 10 years. These scores were not correlated with caregiver marital status, education level, or children's services files (for caregiver or child). Significant correlation was demonstrated between programme exit scores and age 7 scores, r = 0.701; n = 78, p < .01. Similarly, significant correlation was demonstrated between age 7 and age 10 scores, r = 0.712, n = 78, p < .01. Although fade-out effects have been noted in early intervention programmes (Anderson, Foster, & Frisvold, 2004), positive long-term effects of two-generation preschool programmes in the US. demonstrated increased language development, increased high school completion, and completion of more years of education (Karoly, Kilburn, & Cannon, 2005; Reynolds & Temple, 2008; Reynolds, Temple, White, Ou, & Robertson, 2011; Wasik, Bond, & Hindman, 2006).

Between age 7 and 10 years, receptive language scores improved slightly for Aboriginal children, decreased slightly for other Canadian-born children, and increased considerably for recent immigrant children. Among Canadian families living with low income, there may be protective effects for those of recent immigrant status; immigrant children have lower behaviour problems and higher school performance than other Canadian-born children living with low income (Georgiades, Boyle, & Duku, 2007).

At age 10 years, receptive language scores improved for 36% of the boys and 63% of the girls; girls typically outperform boys in verbal and language skills (Hayiou-Thomas et al., 2012). Receptive language scores of boys among the three cultural groups showed varying trends. At programme intake, receptive language scores of Aboriginal boys were more than one standard deviation below average, while those of other Canadian-born and recent immigrant boys were less than one standard deviation below average. There exist significant gaps in educational and language policies for Aboriginal people in Canada, which contribute to poorer educational outcomes (Haque & Patrick, 2014). Aboriginal boy's scores improved at exit and age 7 years, and dipped at age 10 years. Other Canadian-born boy's scores improved only at exit and then decreased at age 7 and 10 years. Recent immigrant boy's scores improved at all time-points, and at age 10 their scores were within the average range for Canadian children. Receptive language scores were higher for recent immigrant boys than Aboriginal and other Canadian-born boys at age 10 years. Supportive family ties and strong social cohesion in some immigrant families may positively influence bilingual language development in boys; for girls, supportive family ties may be more restrictive, decreasing opportunities for language development due to extra familial responsibilities (Lutz & Crist, 2009).

Changes in receptive language scores of girls were the same among all the three cultural groups. For girls, receptive language scores increased at exit, decreased at age 7 years, and increased at age 10 years. This increase in receptive language scores at age 10 years was significantly correlated with gender. In contrast, for recent immigrant girls, receptive language scores differed significantly from other girls at all time-points, except at programme exit. At programme intake, receptive language scores of recent immigrant girls were more than one standard deviation below average, while those of Aboriginal and other Canadian-born girls were less than one standard deviation below average. Moreover, recent immigrant girl's scores were one-third of a standard deviation lower than that of Aboriginal and other Canadian-born girls at the four time-points.

The comparison of receptive language scores between boys and girls within each cultural group showed no difference, except for recent immigrants. At age 10 years, the receptive language scores of recent immigrant girls decreased the overall mean scores for their cultural group, even though recent immigrant boys markedly improved their receptive language skills. These findings may relate to gender-based differences in acculturation for recent immigrants. Recent immigrant girls have increased potential for psychosocial distress in social and cultural connectedness, a sense of belonging, and mental health (Hilario, Vo, Johnson, & Saewyc, 2014). Investigation of sustained positive effects of early intervention for participants from CUPS One World is essential, but of significant concern are recent immigrant girls, who demonstrated lower receptive language scores than the other girls.

Limitations

Of the 134 children originally enrolled in this study, 42% were lost to follow-up; attrition in longitudinal studies is expected, especially with vulnerable populations (Horowitz, Ladden, & Moriarty, 2002). Of the children lost, 43% were Aboriginal, with similar attrition noted at the age 7 follow-up (Benzies et al., 2012). Participant attrition is an area for further research. The sample size of this study was small due to the intensity and cost of the programming at CUPS One World. There are spaces for 50 families per year in the programme, and were never enough families to create a wait-list control group. There is clear evidence that early intervention programmes make a positive difference in children's outcomes; therefore, withholding programming for some in order to have a control group for this study is not ethical. Confounding factors affecting receptive language scores at age 10 years may include moving from below to above the LICO, and parents/caregivers increasing their education. An increased focus on connections between caregiver psychosocial characteristics and children's developmental outcomes is an area for further research. Another area for exploration is how values and beliefs of recent immigrant families may affect children's developmental outcomes, in particular, those of new immigrant girls.

Policy implications

Findings of this longitudinal study to age 10 years of children living in low-income families provide several implications for policy-makers. We have identified that young immigrant girls may benefit the most from continued targeted intervention; this may become even more essential as they reach adolescence (Hilario et al., 2014). Immigrant children may experience socialisation into a new culture differently than their parents; in particular, when immigrant girls reach adolescence, they may experience conflict between cultural constraints and societal freedoms in a new country (Coll & Magnuson, 2001). Further research regarding cultural differences of immigrants from varying countries is an area for exploration (Vang, Sigouin, Flenon, & Gagnon, 2015). Sustained funding for early childhood and youth intervention programming for immigrant children and youth is essential (Este & Van Ngo, 2011).

Transition to school is a time of increased stress for children, especially those in low-income families, and those with limited language skills (Wong, 2014). The transition from intensive supportive early intervention programming to public neighbourhood schools may have been a difficult adjustment and resulted in decreased receptive language scores at age 7 years. By age 10 years, most children may have adapted to moving from the supportive programme environment, to the public school system, demonstrating increases in their receptive language scores overall. Initially, supportive transition workers for children leaving CUPS One World and transitioning into schools were part of programming, but were discontinued due to lack of funding. Supportive transition workers may be especially strategic for new immigrant girls. Provision of familiar, on-site, supportive transition workers for children may facilitate the transition to the children's neighbourhood school. Ongoing longitudinal research with this group of vulnerable families is warranted, with a focus on recent immigrant girls, and retention of Aboriginal participants.

ORCID

Muhammad Kashif Mughal http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1321-0619

Carla S. Ginn http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8343-1388

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the children, caregivers, and staff at CUPS One World Child Development Centre, and Carlene Donnelly, Executive Director. Thanks also to the many research assistants who collected and managed data. Dr M. Kashif Mughal is a University of Calgary, Eyes High Post-Doctoral Fellow. Carla Ginn holds the Stephanson Cooke Doctoral Scholarship.

Notes on contributors

Dr Karen Benzies, Professor, Faculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, has been the lead researcher in the community-university partnership since Calgary urban project society (CUPS) One World was established. Benzies brings expertise in early childhood development, developmental screening, early childhood interventions, family resiliency, as well as longitudinal and multiple methods research designs.

Dr Kashif Mughal (Postdoctoral Fellow, University of Calgary Eyes High Postdoctoral Fellow programme) has worked on a number of clinical research projects throughout his undergraduate and postgraduate education. Mughal brings experience in managing, reporting and analysing large data sets. His current postdoctoral position at the University of Calgary is to evaluate the effectiveness of evidence-based early parenting education and family support programme at CUPS on child mental health and overall well-being of the family.

Carla Ginn (Ph.D. Candidate, Faculty of Nursing, University of Calgary) holds a Master of Science in Nursing and has worked with vulnerable populations throughout her nursing practice. Her Ph.D. dissertation involves a mixed-methods follow-up at age 10 years, the experiences of caregivers whose children completed the programme at CUPS, and those who exited the programme early.

Robert Perry is the Senior Director – Strategic Initiatives at CUPS Health Education and Housing Centres, an inner-city, not-for-profit, registered charitable organisation with a goal of moving individuals and families out of poverty and helping them thrive.

Funding Statement

The Max Bell Foundation provided funding under [grant number 07-C-40].

Disclosure statement

None of the authors have any financial interest or benefit arising from the direct applications of this research study.

References

  1. Alberta Education . How are our young children doing? Final report of the early child development mapping project (ECMap) Edmonton: Government of Alberta; 2014. [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson K., Foster J., Frisvold D. Investing in health: The long-term impact of head start. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University; 2004. [Google Scholar]
  3. Anthony E. K., King B., Austin M. J.2011Reducing child poverty by promoting child well-being: Identifying best practices in a time of great need Children and Youth Services Review ,101999–2009. 10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.05.029 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Beiser M., Zilber N., Simich L., Youngmann R., Zohar A. H., Taa B., Hou F.2011Regional effects on the mental health of immigrant children: Results from the New Canadian Children and Youth Study (NCCYS) Health & Place ,3822–829. 10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.03.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Benzies K., Edwards N., Tough S., Nagan K., Mychasiuk R., Keown L. A., Donnelly C.2010Effects of a two-generation preschool programme on receptive language skill in low-income Canadian children Early Child Development and Care ,3397–412. 10.1080/03004430903424579 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Benzies K., Mychasiuk R., Kurilova J., Tough S., Edwards N., Donnelly C.2012Two-generation preschool programme: Immediate and 7-year-old outcomes for low-income children and their parents Child & Family Social Work ,2203–214. 10.1111/j.1365-2206.2012.00894.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Benzies K., Tough S., Edwards N., Nagan K., Nowicki B., Mychasiuk R., Donnelly C.2009Effects of a two-generation Canadian preschool program on parenting stress, self-esteem, and life skills Early Childhood Services ,119–32. [Google Scholar]
  8. Bornstein M. H., Haynes O. M.1998Vocabulary competence in early childhood: Measurement, latent construct, and predictive validity Child Development ,3654–671. 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1998.tb06235.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Brooks-Gunn J., Duncan G. J.1997The effects of poverty on children The Future of Children ,255–71. 10.2307/1602387 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Carlton M. P., Winsler A.1999School readiness: The need for a paradigm shift School Psychology Review ,3338–352. [Google Scholar]
  11. Coll C. G., Magnuson K. The psychological experience of immigration: A developmental perspective. Vol. 4. New York, NY: Routledge; 2001. pp. 69–110. [Google Scholar]
  12. Collin C., Campbell B. 2008 Measuring poverty: A challenge for Canada (Library of Parliament Publication No. PRB 08-65E). Ottawa, ON: Parliament of Canada.
  13. CUPS Health and Education . Paint a picture of hope. Calgary: CUPS Health and Education Centres; 2010. [Google Scholar]
  14. Dunn L., Dunn L. Peabody picture vocabulary test. 3rd ed. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Services; 1997. [Google Scholar]
  15. The Environics Institute . Urban Aboriginal peoples study: Calgary report. Toronto: Author; 2012. [Google Scholar]
  16. Este D., Van Ngo H. A resilience framework to examine immigrant and refugee children and youth in Canada. In: Chuang S. S., Moreno R. P., editors. Immigrant children: Change, adaptation, and cultural transformation. Plymouth: Lexington Books; 2011. pp. 27–50. [Google Scholar]
  17. Findlay L., Kohen D., Miller A.2014Developmental milestones among Aboriginal children in Canada Paediatrics and Child Health ,5241–246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Fox S. E., Levitt P., Nelson C. A., III2010How the timing and quality of early experiences influence the development of brain architecture Child Development ,128–40. 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01380.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Georgiades K., Boyle M. H., Duku E.2007Contextual influences on children's mental health and school performance: The moderating effects of family immigrant status Child Development ,51572–1591. 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01084.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hackman D. A., Farah M. J., Meaney M. J.2010Socioeconomic status and the brain: Mechanistic insights from human and animal research Nature Reviews Neuroscience ,9651–659. 10.1038/nrn2897 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Haque E., Patrick D.2014Indigenous languages and the racial hierarchisation of language policy in Canada Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development ,127–41. 10.1080/01434632.2014.892499 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hayiou-Thomas M. E., Dale P. S., Plomin R.2012The etiology of variation in language skills changes with development: A longitudinal twin study of language from 2 to 12 years Developmental Science ,2233–249. 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01119.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hertzman C., Boyce T.2010How experience gets under the skin to create gradients in developmental health The Annual Review of Public Health ,329–347. 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.012809.103538 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Hilario C. T., Vo D. X., Johnson J. L., Saewyc E. M.2014Acculturation, gender, and mental health of Southeast Asian immigrant youth in Canada Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health ,61121–1129. 10.1007/s10903-014-9978-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Horowitz J. A., Ladden M. D., Moriarty H. J.2002Methodological challenges in research with vulnerable families Journal of Family Nursing ,4315–333. 10.1177/107484002237510 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Karoly L. A., Kilburn M. R., Cannon J. S. Early childhood interventions: Proven results, future promise. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation; 2005. [Google Scholar]
  27. Kirmayer L., Simpson C., Cargo M.2003Healing traditions: Culture, community and mental health promotion with Canadian Aboriginal peoples Australasian Psychiatry ,s1S15–S23. 10.1046/j.1038-5282.2003.02010.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Knopf K. Aboriginal Canada revisited. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press; 2008. [Google Scholar]
  29. Lutz A., Crist S.2009Why do bilingual boys get better grades in English-only America: The impacts of gender, language and family interaction on academic achievement of Latino/a children of immigrants Ethnic and Racial Studies ,2346–368. 10.1080/01419870801943647 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. McEwen A., Stewart J. M.2014The relationship between income and children's outcomes: A synthesis of Canadian evidence Canadian Public Policy ,199–109. 10.3138/cpp.40.1-SYN [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Mikkonen J., Raphael D. Social determinants of health: The Canadian facts. Toronto: York University School of Health Policy and Management; 2010. [Google Scholar]
  32. Mychasiuk R., Benzies K.2012Facebook: An effective tool for participant retention in longitudinal research Child: Care, Health and Development ,5753–756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. National Collaborating Centre for Aboriginal Health . An overview of Aboriginal health in Canada. Prince George: University of Northern British Columbia; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  34. Nelson H. D., Nygren P., Walker M., Panoscha R.2006Screening for speech and language delay in preschool children: Systematic evidence review for the US preventive services task force Pediatrics ,2e298–e319. 10.1542/peds.2005-1467 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Oliver L. N., Hayes M. V. Neighbourhood socio-economic status and the prevalence of overweight Canadian children and youth. Canadian Journal of Public Health. 2005;(6):415–420. doi: 10.1007/BF03405180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Pagani L. S., Fitzpatrick C.2013Children's school readiness: Implications for eliminating future disparities in health and education Health Education & Behavior ,125–33. 10.1177/1090198113478818 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Reynolds A. J., Temple J. Cost-effective early childhood development programs from preschool to third grade. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology. 2008:109–139. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Reynolds A. J., Temple J. A., White B. A., Ou S. R., Robertson D. L. Age 26 cost–benefit analysis of the child-parent center early education program. Child Development. 2011;(1):379–404. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01563.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Ryan R. M., Fauth R. C., Brooks-Gunn J. Childhood poverty: Implications for school readiness and early childhood education. In: Spodek B., Saracho O. N., editors. Handbook of research on the education of young children. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Routledge; 2013. pp. 323–346. [Google Scholar]
  40. Sauve R., editor. The current state of Canadian family finances: 2007 report. Ottawa: Vanier Institute of the Family; 2008. [Google Scholar]
  41. Séguin L., Nikiema B., Gauvin L., Lambert M., Tu M. T., Kakinami L., Paradis G.2012Tracking exposure to child poverty during the first 10 years of life in a Quebec birth cohort Canadian Journal of Public Health ,4e270–e276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Shonkoff J. P., Garner A. S.2012The lifelong effects of early childhood adversity and toxic stress Pediatrics ,1e232–e246. 10.1542/peds.2011-2663 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Spencer N., Thanh T. M., Louise S.2013Low income/socio-economic status in early childhood and physical health in later childhood/adolescence: A systematic review Maternal and Child Health Journal ,3424–431. 10.1007/s10995-012-1010-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Statistics Canada 2006 Income of Canadians. Retrieved from www.statcan.ca/Daily/English/060330/d060330a.htm.
  45. Statistics Canada . Low income lines. Ottawa: Government of Canada; 2011–2012. [Google Scholar]
  46. Statistics Canada . 2011 national household survey: Aboriginal peoples in Canada: First Nations people, Metis, and Inuit. Ottawa: Government of Canada; 2013a. [Google Scholar]
  47. Statistics Canada . 2011 National household survey: Immigration and ethnocultural diversity in Canada. Ottawa: Government of Canada; 2013b. [Google Scholar]
  48. Tjepkema M. The health of the off-reserve Aboriginal population. Canadian Community Health Survey – 2002 Annual Report. 2002;(S):73–88. [Google Scholar]
  49. Tjepkema M., Wilkins R., Senecal S., Guimond E., Penney C.2009Mortality of metis and registered Indian adults in Canada: An 11-year follow-up study Statistics Canada Health Reports ,430–51. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Vang Z., Sigouin J., Flenon A., Gagnon A.2015The healthy immigrant effect in Canada: A systematic review Population Change and Lifecourse Strategic Knowledge Cluster Discussion Paper Series/Un Réseau stratégique de connaissances Changements de population et parcours de vie Document de travail ,11–43. [Google Scholar]
  51. Van Hulst A., Séguin L., Zunzunegui M.-V., Vélez M. P., Nikiéma B. The influence of poverty and social support on the perceived health of children born to minority migrant mothers. Ethnicity & Health. 2011;(3):185–200. doi: 10.1080/13557858.2011.559536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Waldram J. B., Herring A., Young T. K. Aboriginal health in Canada: Historical, cultural, and epidemiological perspectives. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; 2006. [Google Scholar]
  53. Wasik B., Bond M., Hindman A. The effects of a language and literacy intervention on head start children and teachers. Journal of Educational Psychology. 2006;(1):63–74. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.63. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  54. Wilkins R., Houle C., Berthelot J.-M., Ross N. The changing health status of Canada's children. Isuma. 2000;(2):57–63. [Google Scholar]
  55. Wong M.2014Voices of children, parents and teachers: How children cope with stress during school transition Early Child Development and Care ,4658–678. 10.1080/03004430.2014.948872 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Early Child Development and Care are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES