Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2016 Jul 13;6:29653. doi: 10.1038/srep29653

Multimodal Imaging of Nanocomposite Microspheres for Transcatheter Intra-Arterial Drug Delivery to Liver Tumors

Dong-Hyun Kim 1,2,a, Weiguo Li 1, Jeane Chen 1, Zhuoli Zhang 1,2, Richard M Green 3, Sui Huang 4, Andrew C Larson 1,2,5,6,7
PMCID: PMC4942792  PMID: 27405824

Abstract

A modern multi-functional drug carrier is critically needed to improve the efficacy of image-guided catheter-directed approaches for the treatment of hepatic malignancies. For this purpose, a nanocomposite microsphere platform was developed for selective intra-arterial transcatheter drug delivery to liver tumors. In our study, continuous microfluidic methods were used to fabricate drug-loaded multimodal MRI/CT visible microspheres that included both gold nanorods and magnetic clusters. The resulting hydrophilic, deformable, and non-aggregated microspheres were mono-disperse and roughly 25 um in size. Sustained drug release and strong MRI T2 and CT contrast effects were achieved with the embedded magnetic nano-clusters and radiopaque gold nanorods. The microspheres were successfully infused through catheters selectively placed within the hepatic artery in rodent models and subsequent distribution in the targeted liver tissues and hepatic tumors confirmed with MRI and CT imaging. These multimodal nanocomposite drug carriers should be ideal for selective intra-arterial catheter-directed administration to liver tumors while permitting MRI/CT visualization for patient-specific confirmation of tumor-targeted delivery.

Hepatocellular cancer (HCC) is the world’s second leading cause of cancer death1; the poor prognosis for HCC patients is typically complicated by concurrent liver cirrhosis. Surgical intervention, consisting of resection and transplantation, remains the only curative approach for the treatment of HCC. However, given advanced disease stage and/or the lack of available donors for transplant, most patients are not considered surgical candidates. Non-surgical, primarily palliative approaches include percutaneous ablation (RFA, cryo- or micro-wave ablation) and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE). For decades, TACE has been a mainstay for the treatment of HCC patients with intermediate-stage disease2,3. TACE relies upon differences in the blood supply between HCC and normal liver tissues. Hepatic arteries supply ~90% of blood flow to HCC but only ~25% of flow to normal liver4. TACE involves arterial infusion of chemotherapeutic drugs (doxorubicin, cisplatin, and/or mitomycin-C) emulsified within lipiodol (viscous embolic oil) and embolization of the parent vessel with gel-foam or beads5,6,7. However, recent data suggests that even with catheter-directed hepatic arterial infusion, the systemic exposure to chemotherapy agents following conventional TACE remains high; many patients still suffer from systemic side effects. The overall survival benefit afforded by current liver-directed transcatheter approaches remains relatively modest8,9,10. Recently, drug-eluting bead (DEB) TACE approaches were developed for DOX delivery via non-resorbable hydrophilic polymers intended to permit sustained drug release for extended exposure of tumor tissues; however, despite providing a potentially preferable safety profiles, DEB-TACE has not yet demonstrated significant improvements in treatment outcomes compared with conventional TACE using iodinated oil.

TACE requires intra-procedural imaging with x-ray-based digital subtraction angiography (DSA) for catheter guidance and monitoring of subsequent drug infusion and embolization procedures. There is an increasing interest to introduce magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) into the interventional radiology suite to offer the benefit of functional measurements to guide therapeutic endpoints11,12,13. However, current DEB technology, lipiodol oil and the gel foams used in clinical settings are visible with both imaging modalities; importantly, the delivery of DEBs is not directly monitored as these are not visible with x-ray or MRI modalities14.

A modern multi-functional drug carrier for image guided catheter-directed procedures is critically needed to improve therapeutic outcomes. Incorporation of imaging agents into the drug source itself (i.e., a radiopaque/magnetic microspheres) should offer several advantages over current embolization agents not visible with clinical imaging modalities15,16,17,18. Multimodal MRI/CT visible microspheres would permit direct visualization of these drug carriers and during the delivery the tumoricidal drugs. Monitoring the distribution of these drug-loaded microspheres is paramount to determine the success of a given procedure to permit physicians to either administer additional microspheres to achieve an optimal tumor dose or even reposition the catheter to ensure complete coverage of the targeted lesion. In this study, MRI/CT visible drug eluting nanocomposite microspheres containing multimodal imaging contrast agents (magnetic clusters and Au nanorods) were fabricated by adopting a microfluidic gelation process. The drug release profile and imaging properties of these MRI/CT visible nanocomposite microsphere drug carriers were first evaluated in vitro and in vivo studies in orthotopic HCC rat models demonstrated potential for MRI/CT detection of these nanocomposite microspheres following intra-arterial infusion procedures.

Materials and Methods

Chemicals

FeCl3, polyacrylic acid (PAA), sodium hydroxide, diethylene glycol (DEG), hydrogen tetrachloroaurate(III) trihydrate (HAuCl4∙3H20, 99.9%), silver nitrate (AgNO3, 99%), L-ascorbic acid (AA; C6H8O6, ≥98%), sodium borohydrate (NaBH4, 98%) and CTAB (cetyltrimethylammonium bromide, 99%), sodium alginate, calcium chloride, span 80 and n’-hexadecane were used as purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, USA). Amine-PEG-thiol (MW 5K) was purchased from Laysan Bio (Arab, Al, USA). 6-methoxyethylamino numonafide (MEAN), demonstrated efficacy against HCC was selected as a model drug19,20,21. 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT, Sigma, USA) and dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO, Amresco, USA) were used for MTT assays.

Synthesis of Magnetic Clusters and Au nanorods

Magnetic clusters were synthesized with a high temperature hydrolysis reaction22,23. Briefly, a NaOH/DEG stock solution (NaOH (2 g) in diethylene glycol (DEG) (20 ml)) was prepared. The solution was heated to 120 °C for 30 min under nitrogen, cooled, and kept at 70 °C. A mixture of FeCl3 (0.4 mmol), polyacrylic acid (PAA) (4 mmol), and DEG (17 ml) was heated to 220 °C in a nitrogen atmosphere for 30 min with vigorous stirring to form a transparent solution. NaOH/DEG stock solution (2 ml) was injected into the hot mixture. The resulting mixture was further heated for 1 h. The final products were washed with a mixture of Milli-Q water and ethanol 3 times and re-dispersed in Milli-Q water. 10 mmol MEAN was loaded on the magnetic clusters by mixing in ethanol/H2O (1:1, v/v) mixture, centrifuge and drying adsorption processes. Au nanorods were synthesized with a seed mediated method24. For synthesizing Au seeds, 250 uL of an aqueous 0.01 M solution of HAuCl4∙3H20 was added to 7.5 mL of a 0.1 M CTAB solution in a glass vial. The solutions were gently mixed by inversion. Next, 0.6 mL of an aqueous 0.01 M ice-cold NaBH4 solution was added, followed by rapid inversion mixing. The synthesized Au seeds were used for growing Au nanorods. 4.75 mL of 0.1 M CTAB, 200 uL of 0.01 M HAuCl4∙3H20, and 30 uL of 0.01 M AgNO3 solutions were added, one by one, to a glass vial, followed by gentle mixing by inversion. 32 uL of 0.1 M AA was added to this mixture. Finally, 0.010 mL of the Au seed solution was added, and the reaction mixture gently mixed for 10 s before leaving undisturbed for at least 3 h. The synthesized Au nanorods were further modified with amine-PEG-thiol. 100 mL of aqueous amine-PEG-thiol (2 mM) was added to 10 mL of Au nanorods (0.02 M). The mixture was stirred and incubated at room temperature for 3 h to allow complete PEG modification of the Au nanorods with thiol of PEG. The mixture was then purified by centrifugation at 8500 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant was decanted, and the pellet was re- suspended in 5 mL MilliQ water.

Microfluidic Fabrication of Nanocomposite Microspheres

Microfluidic chips with channel dimensions of 130 um in depth and width were fabricated by soft lithography techniques. A previously reported two-step droplet gelation process was adopted to produce nanocomposite microspheres19. An oil, used as the continuous phase, was composed of n’-hexadecane and span80 (2% w/w). An aqueous mixture solution of sodium alginate (2% w/w), MEAN-magnetic clusters (1.5% w/w) and Au nanorods (1.5% w/w) was prepared for the dispersed phase. All flow streams were individually driven using independent syringe pumps (New Era NE-1000, NY, USA) to maintain a constant flow rate. The inlet ports were connected to the syringes (20 ml) using Tygon tubing (.02 inch I.D). A microscope (Olympus, Japan) was used for observation. Microspheres generated by shearing the dispersed phase were collected in a calcium chloride (50 mM; 40 ml) reservoir. The resulting microspheres were separated from the oil solution with a centrifuge and magnetic separation procedure. These microspheres were subsequently washed 3 times with 30 mL of Milli-Q water.

Characterization of Nanocomposite Microspheres

The morphology and size of the synthesized magnetic clusters and Au nanorods were characterized using a transmission electronic microscope (TEM; FEI Tecnai Spirit G2). The structures of the samples were determined by X-ray diffraction (XRD; D/MAX Rint2000, Rigaku, Japan) using Ni-filtered Cu-ka X-rays with the phase being identified by a comparison with the JCPDS database. The morphologies and magnetic properties of the synthesized microspheres were characterized with an optical microscope (CKX41, Olympus, Japan) equipped with a video camera (QColor5, Olympus, Japan), scanning electronic microscope (JEOL, JSM-5200, Japan), confocal laser-scanning microscope (Zeiss LSM 510 META laser scanning confocal, Germany) and superconducting quantum interface device (SQUID, MPMS-XL, USA). 300 microspheres within these optical images were randomly selected to estimate the average size and size distribution. Images were analyzed with the aid of image processing software (Image J).

Drug Loading Efficiency and Release Studies

The amount of MEAN drug loaded into the microspheres during synthesis was measured by dissolving the fabricated nanocomposite microspheres in a 50 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) solution with sonication for 10 min. Drug elution studies were performed to investigate MEAN release kinetics from nanocomposite microspheres incorporating alginate (40 wt%), magnetic clusters (30 wt%) and Au nanorods (30 wt%) at 37 °C. An aqueous sample solution (10 mg/ml; 1 ml) was placed in a membrane bag (Spectra/Por MWCO 10,000, Spectrum, Los Angeles, CA, USA) and then immersed in 40 ml of PBS (Phosphate Buffer Solution, pH 7.2) solution. The temperature of the medium was maintained at 37 °C using a water bath. At specific time intervals, PBS (1 ml) medium was extracted and replaced with fresh medium. The extracted PBS was diluted with ethanol (1:1 v/v) to measure MEAN concentrations. The concentration of released MEAN from each sample was determined using fluorescent spectroscopy (SpectraMax M5, Molecular Devices, CA, USA). These measurements were performed three times and averaged to determine percentages of cumulative drug release amounts over time. The MEAN loaded nanocomposite microspheres were also imaged using confocal fluorescent microscopy at characteristic excitation and emission wavelengths for MEAN (λex = 445 nm and λem = 550 nm).

In vitro Cytotoxicity of Nanocomposite Microsphere Drug-Delivery Platform

Cytotoxicity of the nanocomposite microspheres was evaluated with MTT assay. McA-RH7777 hepatoma cell line and Clone 9 liver cell line (ATCC, CRL-1601, Manassas, VA, USA) were cultured in respective Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium and F-12K medium (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA) and 0.1% gentamycin (Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA). Cells from the exponential phase of the culture were harvested and diluted to a cell density of about 2 × 104 per ml. 100 ul of the cell suspension was added to 180 ul of medium in each well of a 96-well plate, incubated at 37 °C, 5% CO2 and 95% air for 1 day. A 10 ul solution consisting of different amounts of nanocomposite microspheres (composed of 40 wt% alginate, 30 wt% magnetic clusters and 30 wt% Au nanorods but without MEAN loading as intention was to study biocompatibility of the drug carrier) was then added to the respective wells and incubated for specific periods of time. Control studies were conducted using dose wells with normal saline. Exposure time was 40 h. Treated cells were then rinsed with PBS before 20 ul of PBS containing 5 mg/ml of MTT was added prior to incubation for another 4 h. This was followed by the addition of 150 ul of DMSO and plate agitation for 10 min. The optical density (OD) of the contents in each well was then measured at 570 nm using a bioassay reader (SpectraMax M5, Molecular Devices, CA, USA). OD measurements were repeated in triplicate. Cell viability for each sample was calculated as the ratio between OD measurements within control and treatment wells (%viability = (ODtreatment/ODcontrol)*100). Significant differences were determined using the Student’s t-test where differences were considered significant (p < 0.05).

Characterization of MR Relaxivity Properties

T2 relaxation times for the nanocomposite microspheres were determined using a 7 Tesla MRI scanner (Clinscan, Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA). Imaging phantoms were prepared by diluting samples in 1% agarose at various concentrations of nanocomposite microsphere. The atomic Fe concentrations of the stock solutions were determined using Inductively Coupled Plasma Spectroscopy (ICP-MS, Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) and MRI signal changes were measured with increasing Fe concentrations of the nanocomposite microspheres. Samples were suspended within agarose phantoms. For T2 measurement, a Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill (CPMG) sequence of 6 echoes was used with TR  =  1000 ms and TE  =  6.4–44.8 ms with an echo interval of 6.4 ms. The T2 values were calculated on a voxel-wise basis using a least squares single exponential fitting model and then a signal ROI selected for each phantom to report the mean T2 value. Finally, we calculated the linear fit line between these T2 relaxation values and nanocomposite microspheres concentration with corresponding slope thus providing relaxivity estimate (Origin 7.0, Northhampton, MA).

Characterization of CT Attenuation Properties

CT imaging of agarose phantoms that included nanocomposite microspheres (concentrations ranging from 2 to 10 mg/ml) was performed using a Siemens SOMATOM Definition Flash (Siemens, Forchheim, Germany) with the following acquisition protocol: pitch 0.8, collimation 32 × 0.5 mm. 140 kVp, 260 mAs, FOV 96 × 114 mm, the matrix size 512 × 512. The data were reconstructed using a B40f kernel. CT images were analyzed using OsiriX (OsiriX Foundation, Geneva, Switzerland).

McA-RH7777 Rat Hepatoma Model

McA-RH7777 hepatoma cells were implanted in the left lateral liver lobe during mini-laparotomy procedures in 10 male Sprague Dawley rats. Briefly, rats were anesthetized with isoflurane (mixture of 5% isoflurane and oxygen at 3 L/min). A mini-laparotomy performed and left hepatic lobe exposed. 1 × 106 McA-RH7777 cells were injected in the left lateral lobe and surgical site closed in 2-layers. Tumors were allowed to grow for 7 days to reach a size >5 mm in diameter while observing animal daily for any signs of distress. All animal studies were performed in accordance with protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Northwestern University.

Hepatic Intra-arterial Transcatheter Infusion of Nanocomposite Microspheres

After 7 days of tumor growth, the following steps were used to invasively catheterize the left hepatic artery (LHA) for selective infusion of the nanocomposite microspheres in each animal25,26. First, rats were anesthetized with isoflurane induction. After laparotomy, a cotton-tipped applicator was used to expose the common hepatic artery (CHA), proper hepatic artery (PHA), and gastroduodenal artery (GDA). A micro bulldog clamp (World Precision Instruments, Sarasota, FL) was placed on the CHA to prevent bleeding during catheterization. 4-0 Vetacryl absorbable polyglycolic acid suture (Webster Veterinary, Devens, MA) was then used to ligate the GDA distally to control retrograde bleeding during catheterization. Next, a 24G SurFlash polyurethane catheter (Terumo Medical Co., Somerset, NJ) was inserted into the GDA, advanced into the PHA and then distally into the LHA. X-ray digital subtraction angiographic (DSA) was used to confirm catheter placement in common branch of PHA using iodinated contrast (Omnipaque, Amersham). After selective catheterization, 0.1 mL of heparin was infused before infusing the nanocomposite microspheres (20 mg in 250 ul of PBS); each infusion was followed by a 0.2 mL saline flush. The catheter was then withdrawn, and a 3-0 suture used to permanently ligate the GDA above the insertion position. Finally, abdomen was closed using two-layer technique. The animals were then moved to the MRI and CT scanner located adjacent to the surgical suite. Post MRI scans were typically performed 1 hour after IA infusion. This time delay was necessary to allow us to withdraw catheter, surgically close the animal, and move to adjacent MRI.

MRI and CT Visualization of Nanocomposite Microsphere Delivery

MRI studies were performed using a Bruker 7.0T ClinScan high-field small animal MRI system with a commercial rat coil (Bruker Biospin). Body temperature was monitored continuously and controlled with a water-bed (SA Instruments, Stony Brook, NY). T2-weighted images were collected pre- and post-arterial infusion of the nanocomposite microspheres. MR scans were performed using a gradient-echo sequence with following parameters: TR/TE = 1,300/7.2 ms, 0.7 mm slice thickness, FOV 71 × 85 mm, 216 × 256 matrix, respiratory triggering with MRI-compatible small animal gating system (Model 1025, SA Instruments, Stony Brook, NY). In vivo contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was calculated as the ratio between the image contrast between tumor regions and liver regions with the image noise, which was given by CNR = (SNRtumor rim−SNRliver)/SNRtumor rim.

For in vivo CT imaging, a Siemens SOMATOM Definition Flash (Siemens, Forchheim, Germany) system was used. Rats (n = 6) were imaged post-infusion of the nanocomposite microspheres. Images were acquired using following parameters: 140 kVp, 260 mAs, 0.6 mm slice thickness, a matrix size of 512 × 512 and a 10 × 10 mm FOV. The data were reconstructed using a D30f kernel and analyzed using OsiriX (OsiriX Foundation, Geneva, Switzerland).

Histology

Each rat was euthanized after catheterization and imaging procedures. HCC specimens were sliced at 2 mm intervals; these slices were further sectioned into 5 um thick slices for hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and Prussian blue staining to identify regions of HCC tissue and deposition of the nanocomposite microspheres within the tumor. All slides were digitized at x200 optical magnification using a TissueFAXS microscope (TissueGnostics GmbH, Vienna, Austria). Post-processing was performed using the HistoQuest software package (TissueGnostics GmbH).

Results

Fabrication of Nanocomposite Microspheres

~62 nm iron oxide nanoclusters (Fig. 1a) and Au nanorods with average dimensions (length × width) of 33 × 8.6 nm (Fig. 1b) were synthesized. The XRD patterns of the prepared magnetic clusters were indexed to the (220), (311), (400), (511), (440), (422), and (533) planes of a cubic unit cell (Fig. S1), which primarily corresponds to that of the magnetite structure (JCPDS No. 79-0417)27. These magnetic clusters were supramolecular structures formed by controlled agglomeration of iron oxide nanoparticles. The magnetic cluster solution was strongly water-dispersible and stable in aqueous solution with a surface charge of −42.1 mV (zeta-potential). 75% of initial amount of drug (MEAN) was loaded onto the magnetic clusters. Then, Au nanorods were synthesized with seed mediated methods. The synthesized Au nanorods also confirmed the fcc Au crystalline structure in the XRD measurement. The peak indexing were corresponding to (111), (200), (220) and (311) reflections of Au (Fig. S2). The length of the Au nanorods was 32 nm and the aspect ratio of the rods was 3.83. These MEAN-magnetic clusters and Au nanorods were incorporated into the alginate microsphere using a microfluidic channel. The microfluidic fabrication methods produced nanocomposite microspheres when using 5 ul/min and 25 ul/min flow rates for the dispersed and continuous oil phase solutions, respectively (Fig. 1c). The sheared microsphere aqueous phase in the microfluidic channel was gelled into solid nanocomposite microspheres upon contact with CaCl2 solution by crosslinking. The MEAN-magnetic clusters and Au nanorods were encapsulated within the microspheres (Fig. 1c). The shape of the microspheres remained spheroidal after the crosslinking gelation. The measured average diameter of the microspheres was 25 um with a variation of 10%, as demonstrated by the size distribution of these magnetic microspheres in aqueous solution (Fig. 1d). These nanocomposite microspheres demonstrated superparamagnetic properties preserving the magnetic properties of the magnetic clusters; incorporation of the Au nanorods was confirmed with a near infrared absorption at 800 nm (Fig. S1). Loading of the MEAN-magnetic clusters into the nanocomposite microspheres was confirmed with fluorescent images that showed the MEAN distribution within the nanocomposite microspheres (Fig. 2a). Drug-loaded nanocomposite microspheres demonstrated sustained MEAN release rates (47% in 24 hours) (Fig. 2b). The biocompatibility of these nanocomposite microspheres was validated during hepatoma and hepatic epithelial cell exposure studies (Fig. 2c). No significant toxicities were observed for either McA-Rh7777 hepatoma cells or the Clone 9 liver epithelial cell line upon exposure to these nanocomposite microspheres across concentrations ranging from 0 to 3 mg/mL.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

TEM images of (a) iron oxide nanoclusters and (b) gold nanorods, (c) optical microscopy image and (d) size distribution of microfluidic fabricated nanocomposite microspheres (incorporating alginate, iron oxide nanoclusters and Au nanorods).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

(a) Fluorescent microscope images of MEAN loaded nanocomposite microspheres (MEAN: green fluorescent (λexcitation = 445 and λemission = 550 nm)), (b) MEAN drug release profile of nanocomposite microspheres and (c) cytotoxicity of the nanocomposite microspheres (alginate:magnetic nanoclusters:Au nanorods = 1.33:1:1 wt%) in McA-Rh7777 hepatoma cells and Clone9 liver epithelial cells.

In vitro MRI and CT Imaging Characteristics of Nanocomposite Microspheres

Agar phantom signal intensities during T2-weighted MR imaging decreased with increasing concentration of nanocomposite microspheres encapsulating MEAN-magnetic clusters (1.5% w/w) and Au nanorods (1.5% w/w) (Fig. 3a). Across the five magnetic microsphere concentrations evaluated, T2-weighted signal decreased in proportion to increasing nanocomposite microsphere concentration. Thus, quantitative R2 (=1/T2) measurements increased with increasing microsphere concentration (Fig. 3a); the calculated r2 relaxivity from these measurements was 15.2 mg−1s−1. Next, the CT contrast characteristics of these microspheres were evaluated. Attenuation values, expressed in Hounsfield units (HU), were measured in agar phantoms with increasing concentration of the nanocomposite microspheres (5, 15, 30, 50 and 60 mg/mL). As demonstrated in Fig. 3b, as the concentration of nanocomposite microspheres increased, CT attenuation increased. HU as a function of microsphere concentration exhibited a linear relationship (R2 = 0.9917), described by the following equation: HU = 4.03651X + 41.529. (HU: CT numbers; X: concentration of nanocomposite microspheres, mg/mL) (Fig. 3b).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

(a) A plot of R2 signal intensity versus nanocomposite microspheres concentrations in 1% agar phantoms and (inset) MRI T2-weighted images at TE = 32 ms showing the expected contrast effects by the nanocomposite microspheres in phantom and (b) Concentration versus CT signal (Hounsfield units, HU) curve of the nanocomposite microspheres. Inset shows CT images of the nanocomposite microspheres comparing with 1% agar phantoms.

Catheterization and MRI/CT Visualization of Nanocomposite Microsphere Delivery

Transcatheter intra-arterial infusion followed by in vivo MR and CT imaging of nanocomposites microsphere delivery was performed in HCC orthotopic rat model (Fig. 4). MRI was used to confirm tumor growth in each rat prior to catheterization procedures (Fig. 4a, Pre). Tumor sizes ranged from 2.5 to 8.1 mm in diameter 7 days post-implantation. Catheterization procedures were successfully performed in each animal. No adverse reactions or complications °Ccurred during or after the IA infusion procedures. Representative T2-weighted images acquired before and after transcatheter nanocomposite microsphere infusion are shown in Fig. 4a,b (and Fig. S3). Tumors were depicted as hyperintense relative to surrounding liver tissues in T2-weighted MRI images (Fig. 4a). Intra-hepatic microsphere delivery was restricted to the targeted tumor-bearing liver lobe with positions of nanocomposite microsphere deposition observed as local reductions to the signal intensity in the peripheral rim of tumor (Fig. 4b). To confirm the T2 contrast of the delivered nanocomposite microspheres, CNR of the rim area of tumor was compared at pre and post IA infusion of the nanocomposite microspheres. Significantly improved CNR of the tumor-rim area at post IA infusion was achieved by the nanocomposite microspheres in in vivo MRI (Fig. 4c). After MRI, the rats were imaged with CT to confirm the multi-modal visibility of these nanocomposite microspheres. CT coronal and 3D MIP (maximum intensity projection) views of a representative rat following microsphere infusion demonstrated enhanced attenuation (~205 HU) around the tumor position (Fig. 4b and Fig. S4).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

(a) T2-weighted MRI acquired (a) before or (b) after transcatheter intra-arterial infusion of nanocomposite microspheres in McA-RH7777 rat HCC models, (c) contrast to noise ratio (CNR) of tumor rim (inset: yellow roi regions) in MRI T2 weighted images at pre- and post-transcatheter infusion of nanocomposite microspheres, and (d) CT (left) coronal and (right) 3D MIP (maximum intensity projection) views (WL = 418, WW = 3106) of the whole mouse body after intra-arterial transcatheter infusion of nanocomposite microspheres in McA-RH7777 rat HCC models. Circles indicate regions with enhanced contrast.

Histology

Nanocomposite microsphere deposition within the peripheral rim of HCC tumor regions (as observed in MRI and CT images) was confirmed with H&E and Prussian blue staining in rat tissue specimens post-necropsy (Fig. 5a,b). The IA infused nanocomposites microspheres were preferentially distributed to blood vessels around the HCC tumor rim regions rather than the normal hepatic tissues.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

(a) H&E and (b) Prussian blue stained HCC liver tissues in McA-RH7777 rat hepatoma. Prussian blue staining of IA treated tumor tissues confirmed delivery of the nanocomposite microspheres (blue: microspheres deposits well depicted from representative histology slide). A region depicting both tumor rim and adjacent normal liver tissues from a treatment group.

Discussion

Systemic chemotherapy is typically not well tolerated by liver cancer patients, particularly those with significant underlying hepatic dysfunction. A significant challenge for liver cancer chemotherapies is to deliver efficacious doses of drug to tumor tissues with minimal systemic toxicity. Another challenge is the highly variable biodistribution of chemotherapy drugs upon administration; patient-specific knowledge of the dose delivered to individual tumors should be valuable for timely adjustments to the therapeutic regimen. In our study, a nanocomposite microsphere drug-delivery platform was developed to permit transcatheter intra-arterial infusion and follow-up multi-modal (MRI/CT) imaging of the dose delivered to the targeted liver tumor tissues. Iron oxide nanoclusters and gold nanoparticles were incorporated into the fabrication of MRI/CT visible nanocomposite microspheres. The iron oxide nanoclusters demonstrated 3 times higher r2 relaxivity compared to non-clustered 7 nm iron oxide nanoparticles19,23. The hydrophilic PAA polymer and pores generated among the iron oxide nanoparticles increase interaction been susceptibility-induced local field gradients and hydrogen atoms of the local water molecules thus significantly increasing transverse relaxation rates. These strong T2 contrast effects permitted in vivo MRI detection of nanocluster microsphere-containing distribution upon catheter-directed infusion. Au nanoparticles have been widely used for CT imaging given a high X-ray absorption coefficient and the biocompatibility of Au nanoparticles28. In our study, Au nanorods were synthesized to provide a CT imaging component to our microspheres. MRI and CT imaging components and the chemotherapy drug MEAN were encapsulated within microspheres via microfluidic techniques. FDA approved biodegradable polysaccharide alginate polymers were selected for the microsphere matrix. Alginate importantly offers unique properties including biocompatibility, a relatively inert environment within the matrix, and a mild room temperature gelation process19,29. Microfluidic methods were effective for fabrication of nanocomposite microspheres encapsulating both imaging contrast nanoparticles and drug. The size of the nanocomposite microspheres was readily adjusted between 25 to 70 um by changing flow rates of dispersed and continuous phase channels. We targeted production of 20~40 um of nanocomposite microspheres considering diameter of the hepatic artery in rats30 thus ultimately producing 25 um nanocomposite microspheres (1.3:1:1 wt ratio of alginate, iron oxide nanoclusters and Au nanorods) with the following ratio of flow rates (5 ul/min: 25 ul/min, dispersed: continuous oil phase). MEAN drug was recently developed as a less toxic form of anti-neoplastic amonafide (DNA intercalater). MEAN has showed potent inhibition of HCC tumor cell growth with less toxicity than amonafide19,20. The chemotherapeutic agent (MEAN) loaded in the nanocomposite microspheres during the microfluidic process offers potent inhibition of tumor cell growth. A 75% drug loading efficiency was achieved along with sustained drug release characteristics (42% cumulative drug release within one day, drug release lasting for 2 weeks). However, when only the drug MEAN was loaded into the alginate microspheres (without inclusion of the iron-oxide nanoclusters), 90% MEAN drug was released within single day suggesting that the polyelectrolyte PAA-iron oxide nanoclusters slowed release rates, likely due to large pores among cross-linked alginate structures.

MR and CT imaging are the most important modalities for staging and follow-up imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) following catheter directed chemotherapy31. Advantages of CT are that the modality is widely available, rapid, robust, and compared with MR imaging requires less expertise to perform and interpret acquired images. Disadvantages include radiation exposure and relatively low soft-tissue contrast. By comparison, MR imaging provides superior soft-tissue contrast and permits the assessment of a greater number of functional tissue properties, which in principle should assist in lesion detection and characterization. However, given potential ambiguities during MR imaging (eg. pre-existing signal voids prior to microsphere deposition), these MRI detection methods will likely require pre-infusion measurements and thus may be more time consuming and costly. Quantitative MRI methods typically require a greater level of expertise to perform and interpret images. Ultimately MRI and CT imaging are complementary for follow-up monitoring tumor response following catheter directed interventions for the treatment of HCC. The iron oxide cluster component of the microspheres demonstrated high r2 relaxivity (r2 = 199 mM−1s−1 at 3 T), which was higher MR r2 relaxivity than clinical grade Ferucarbotran (r2 = 146.1 mM−1s−1 at 3T), for strong MRI contrast effects32. At the same time, radio opaque Au nanorods were included for simultaneous CT contrast. Traditional CT imaging agents such as barium or iodine have high X-ray absorption coefficients but potentially serious renal toxicities. Gold nanoparticles are generally biocompatible and provide greater contrast than iodinated contrast agents due to the high atomic number (Z = 79) and k-edge value (80.7 keV)33. Furthermore, the contrast effects of iodine, which is sensitive to X-rays at low energies, is strongly dependent upon the environment33. For example, the X-ray attenuation of iodine in water is much lower than X-ray attenuation of iodine in air. The X-ray attenuation of gold nanoparticles is not significantly reduced in water. These results continue to suggest the strong potential for Au nanorods to serve as contrast agents for CT imaging28,34,35,36.

In vivo efficacy of the MRI/CT visible nanocomposite microspheres was evaluated following hepatic intra-arterial infusion procedure in McA-RH7777 rat hepatoma model. In our protocol, MRI was used for identifying tumor regions and MRI/CT used to confirm successful microspheres delivery to the targeted HCC following selective arterial infusion. For trans-arterial liver-directed therapies, visualization of the dose delivered to a targeted tumor could be used to adjust the administered dose (infuse additional drug-carrier) and/or adjust the position of the infusion catheter to achieve complete tumor coverage. Further, MRI/CT visualization of microsphere delivery should allow timely prediction of therapeutic outcome and patient prognosis.

Conclusion

Microfluidics methods were used to fabricate multi-functional nanocomposite microspheres. The fabricated nanocomposite microspheres provided strong MRI T2 and CT image contrast and demonstrated sustained drug release behavior for a representative HCC-targeted drug (MEAN). The microspheres were successfully administered via hepatic intra-arterial routes. In vivo MRI/CT imaging was used to monitor intra-hepatic distribution and confirm delivery to the targeted tumor regions following catheter-directed infusion. These biocompatible MRI/CT visible nanocomposite microspheres should permit sustained targeted drug-delivery and valuable intra-procedural feedback for patient-specific optimization during liver-directed transcatheter therapies.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Kim, D.-H. et al. Multimodal Imaging of Nanocomposite Microspheres for Transcatheter Intra-Arterial Drug Delivery to Liver Tumors. Sci. Rep. 6, 29653; doi: 10.1038/srep29653 (2016).

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information
srep29653-s1.pdf (1.2MB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Basic Research Grant from ACS (American Cancer Society, ACS 279148) and by grants R01CA159178, R01CA181658, R01CA196967, R21CA173491, R21EB017986 and R21CA185274 from the National Cancer Institute and National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering. This work was also supported by the Center for Translational Imaging at Northwestern University.

Footnotes

Author Contributions D.-H.K. and A.C.L. conceived and designed the study. D.-H.K., W.L. and J.C. contributed experimental works. D.-H.K., W.L., J.C., Z.Z., R.M.G., S.H. and A.C.L. contributed collection, analysis of data and manuscript preparation. D.-H.K. and A.C.L. wrote and revised the manuscript.

References

  1. Wild B. W. S. C. P. World Cancer Report 2014. (IARC, 2014). [Google Scholar]
  2. Ono Y. et al. Long-term results of lipiodol-transcatheter arterial embolization with cisplatin or doxorubicin for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. American journal of clinical oncology 23, 564–568 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Raoul J. L. et al. Chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinomas. A study of the biodistribution and pharmacokinetics of doxorubicin. Cancer 70, 585–590 (1992). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ackerman N. B. Experimental studies on the circulation dynamics of intrahepatic tumor blood supply. Cancer 29, 435–439 (1972). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Geschwind J. F., Ramsey D. E., Choti M. A., Thuluvath P. J. & Huncharek M. S. Chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma: results of a metaanalysis. American Journal of Clinical Oncology 26, 344–349 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Llovet J. M. & Bruix J. Systematic review of randomized trials for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: Chemoembolization improves survival. Hepatology 37, 429–442 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lo C. M. et al. Randomized controlled trial of transarterial lipiodol chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 35, 1164–1171 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Johnson P. J. et al. Pharmacokinetics and toxicity of intraarterial adriamycin for hepatocellular carcinoma: effect of coadministration of lipiodol. Journal of hepatology 13, 120–127 (1991). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lewis A. L. et al. DC bead: in vitro characterization of a drug-delivery device for transarterial chemoembolization. Journal of vascular and interventional radiology: JVIR 17, 335–342, doi: 10.1097/01.RVI.0000195323.46152.B3 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Simonetti R. G., Liberati A., Angiolini C. & Pagliaro L. Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Annals of oncology: official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology/ESMO 8, 117–136 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kos S. et al. Feasibility of real-time magnetic resonance-guided angioplasty and stenting of renal arteries in vitro and in Swine, using a new polyetheretherketone-based magnetic resonance-compatible guidewire. Investigative radiology 44, 234–241, doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e31819b00f1 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kramer N. A. et al. Preclinical evaluation of a novel fiber compound MR guidewire in vivo. Investigative radiology 44, 390–397, doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181a66ab5 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Vetter S., Schultz F. W., Strecker E. P. & Zoetelief J. Patient radiation exposure in uterine artery embolization of leiomyomata: calculation of organ doses and effective dose. European radiology 14, 842–848, doi: 10.1007/s00330-003-2088-0 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Sharma K. V. et al. Development of “imageable” beads for transcatheter embolotherapy. Journal of vascular and interventional radiology: JVIR 21, 865–876, doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2010.02.031 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Cilliers R. et al. Modification of embolic-PVA particles with MR contrast agents. Magnetic resonance in medicine: official journal of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine/Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 59, 898–902, doi: 10.1002/mrm.21518 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Horak D. et al. Hydrogels in endovascular embolization. III. Radiopaque spherical particles, their preparation and properties. Biomaterials 8, 142–145 (1987). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lee K. H. et al. Distribution of iron oxide-containing Embosphere particles after transcatheter arterial embolization in an animal model of liver cancer: evaluation with MR imaging and implication for therapy. Journal of vascular and interventional radiology: JVIR 19, 1490–1496, doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2008.06.008 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Namur J. et al. MR imaging detection of superparamagnetic iron oxide loaded tris-acryl embolization microspheres. Journal of vascular and interventional radiology: JVIR 18, 1287–1295, doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2007.07.015 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kim D. H. et al. Microfluidic fabrication of 6-methoxyethylamino numonafide-eluting magnetic microspheres. Acta Biomater 10, 742–750, doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.10.018 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Liu Y. et al. Methoxyethylamino-numonafide is an efficacious and minimally toxic amonafide derivative in murine models of human cancer. Neoplasia 13, 453–460 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Norton J. T. et al. Synthesis and anticancer activities of 6-amino amonafide derivatives. Anticancer Drugs 19, 23–36, doi: 10.1097/CAD.0b013e3282f00e17 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ge J. P., Hu Y. X., Biasini M., Beyermann W. P. & Yin Y. D. Superparamagnetic magnetite colloidal nanocrystal clusters. Angew Chem Int Edit 46, 4342–4345 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kim D. H. et al. Temperature-sensitive magnetic drug carriers for concurrent gemcitabine chemohyperthermia. Adv Healthc Mater 3, 714–724, doi: 10.1002/adhm.201300209 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Sau T. K. & Murphy C. J. Seeded high yield synthesis of short Au nanorods in aqueous solution. Langmuir: the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids 20, 6414–6420, doi: 10.1021/la049463z (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Dong-Hyun Kim J. C., Reed A. Omary & Andrew C Larson. MRI Visible Drug Eluting Magnetic Microspheres for Transcatheter Intra-Arterial Delivery to Liver Tumors. Theranostics 5, 477–488 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Chen J. et al. Poly(lactide-co-glycolide) microspheres for MRI-monitored transcatheter delivery of sorafenib to liver tumors. J Control Release 184, 10–17, doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.04.008 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kim D. H., Kim K. N., Kim K. M. & Lee Y. K. Targeting to carcinoma cells with chitosan- and starch-coated magnetic nanoparticles for magnetic hyperthermia. J Biomed Mater Res A 88, 1–11, doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.31775 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lee N., Choi S. H. & Hyeon T. Nano-sized CT contrast agents. Adv Mater 25, 2641–2660, doi: 10.1002/adma.201300081 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Kim D. H., Chen J., Omary R. A. & Larson A. C. MRI visible drug eluting magnetic microspheres for transcatheter intra-arterial delivery to liver tumors. Theranostics 5, 477–488, doi: 10.7150/thno.10823 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Bastian P., Bartkowski R., Kohler H. & Kissel T. Chemo-embolization of experimental liver metastases. Part I: distribution of biodegradable microspheres of different sizes in an animal model for the locoregional therapy. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 46, 243–254 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Choi J. Y., Lee J. M. & Sirlin C. B. CT and MR imaging diagnosis and staging of hepatocellular carcinoma: part II. Extracellular agents, hepatobiliary agents, and ancillary imaging features. Radiology 273, 30–50, doi: 10.1148/radiol.14132362 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Jeon M. J. et al. Transcatheter intra-arterial infusion of doxorubicin loaded porous magnetic nano-clusters with iodinated oil for the treatment of liver cancer. Biomaterials 88, 25–33, doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.02.021 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Chen H., Rogalski M. M. & Anker J. N. Advances in functional X-ray imaging techniques and contrast agents. Physical chemistry chemical physics: PCCP 14, 13469–13486, doi: 10.1039/c2cp41858d (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Cormode D. P. et al. Atherosclerotic plaque composition: analysis with multicolor CT and targeted gold nanoparticles. Radiology 256, 774–782, doi: 10.1148/radiol.10092473 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Reuveni T., Motiei M., Romman Z., Popovtzer A. & Popovtzer R. Targeted gold nanoparticles enable molecular CT imaging of cancer: an in vivo study. Int J Nanomedicine 6, 2859–2864, doi: 10.2147/IJN.S25446 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Lusic H. & Grinstaff M. W. X-ray-computed tomography contrast agents. Chem Rev 113, 1641–1666, doi: 10.1021/cr200358s (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information
srep29653-s1.pdf (1.2MB, pdf)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES