Skip to main content
Genome Biology and Evolution logoLink to Genome Biology and Evolution
letter
. 2016 Jun 27;8(6):1804–1811. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evw106

Revisiting the Plastid Phylogenomics of Pinaceae with Two Complete Plastomes of Pseudolarix and Tsuga

Edi Sudianto 1,2,3, Chung-Shien Wu 3, Ching-Ping Lin 3,4, Shu-Miaw Chaw 1,3,*
PMCID: PMC4943178  PMID: 27352945

Abstract

Phylogeny of the ten Pinaceous genera has long been contentious. Plastid genomes (plastomes) provide an opportunity to resolve this problem because they contain rich evolutionary information. To comprehend the plastid phylogenomics of all ten Pinaceous genera, we sequenced the plastomes of two previously unavailable genera, Pseudolarix amabilis (122,234 bp) and Tsuga chinensis (120,859 bp). Both plastomes share similar gene repertoire and order. Here for the first time we report a unique insertion of tandem repeats in accD of T. chinensis. From the 65 plastid protein-coding genes common to all Pinaceous genera, we re-examined the phylogenetic relationship among all Pinaceous genera. Our two phylogenetic trees are congruent in an identical tree topology, with the five genera of the Abietoideae subfamily constituting a monophyletic clade separate from the other three subfamilies: Pinoideae, Piceoideae, and Laricoideae. The five genera of Abietoideae were grouped into two sister clades consisting of (1) Cedrus alone and (2) two sister subclades of PseudolarixTsuga and Abies—Keteleeria, with the former uniquely losing the gene psaM and the latter specifically excluding the 3 psbA from the residual inverted repeat.

Keywords: plastid phylogenomics, Tsuga, Pseudolarix, plastid DNA, Pinaceae, accD

Introduction

Pinaceae, the largest family of conifers, comprises more than 230 species in 10 genera—Abies Mill., Cathaya Chun & Kuang, Cedrus Trew, Keteleeria Carrière, Larix Mill., Picea A. Dietr., Pinus L., Pseudotsuga Carrière, Pseudolarix Gordon, and Tsuga (Endl.) Carrière. The family is an important resource for timber, pulp, essential oils, and other forest products. The Pinaceae are exclusively distributed in the northern hemisphere, except for one species, Pinus merkusii Jungh. & de Vriese, whose habitat crosses the equator in Sumatra (Thieret 1993).

The plastid genomes (plastomes) of photosynthetic seed plants are typically small (∼150 kb) with a quadripartite structure containing two inverted repeats (IRA and IRB, ∼20 to 30 kb each), which separate the large and small single copy regions (LSC and SSC) (Jansen and Ruhlman 2012). However, the plastomes of Pinaceous species only range from 107 to 120 kb (Lin et al. 2010) because of their highly reduced IRs (Wu et al. 2007; Wu, Wang, et al. 2011). In addition, Wu, Lin, et al. (2011) reported four distinct plastomic organizations among Pinaceous genera. The diversity of Pinaceous plastomic forms was proposed to be associated with intraplastomic homologous recombination, which is mainly triggered by two types of Pinaceae-specific IR, type 1 and 3 repeats (Wu, Lin, et al. 2011).

The plastome has served as a practical resource to resolve many questions in evolutionary studies, especially in green plant phylogeny (Ruhfel et al. 2014). Previously, Pinaceae plastid phylogenomic study (Lin et al. 2010) evaluated the phylogenetic relationships among eight of the ten Pinaceous genera. However, the remaining two, Pseudolarix and Tsuga, were not included in the study because of the unavailability of samples. Pseudolarix is a monotypic genus restricted to hills and plains along the Yangtze River valley in southeast China (LePage and Basinger 1995), whereas Tsuga contains nine recognized species in East Asia and North America (Havill et al. 2008).

In this study, we determined the complete plastomes of Pseudolarix amabilis and T. chinensis. Comparative plastomic analyses across the ten Pinaceous genera revealed that the accD of Tsuga is expanded with tandem repeats of PD/H amino acids. Our plastid phylogenomic results indicate that the five genera of Abietoideae constitute a monophyletic clade with Cedrus as sister to the clade of the other four genera, including Abies, Keteleeria, Pseudolarix, and Tsuga; and Pseudolarix and Tsuga form a subclade as a sister to the Abies-Keteleeria subclade.

Results and Discussion

Plastomic Features of P. amabilis and Tsuga chinensis

The plastomes of P. amabilis (LC095867) and T. chinensis (LC095866) are circular molecules of 122,234 and 120,859 bp, respectively (supplementary fig. S1, Supplementary Material online). Like other plastomes of Pinaceous genera, the IRs of Pseudolarix and Tsuga are highly reduced, only 449 and 417 bp long, respectively. Their size, gene number, LSC and SSC lengths, and AT content are comparable to those in other Abietoideae genera (table 1). Tsuga and Pseudolarix plastomes share a similar gene repertoire of 35 tRNA genes, four rRNA genes, and 73–74 protein-coding genes (table 1). The Tsuga plastome has one less protein-coding gene than Pseudolarix because its psbI gene is truncated in the type 1 repeat (T1R; see Wu, Lin, et al. 2011) (table 1; supplementary fig. S1, Supplementary Material online). Variations for the total number of genes among Pinaceous genera are due to loss/gain of genes within the T1R. No functional ndh gene has been found in the plastomes of Pseudolarix and Tsuga (supplementary fig. S1, Supplementary Material online), which confirms the loss of all 11 plastid ndh genes from Pinaceae (Braukmann et al. 2009).

Table 1.

Comparisons of Plastome Features Among the Five Genera of Abietoideae

Features Abies koreana Cedrus deodara Keteleeria davidiana Pseudolarix amabilis Tsuga chinensis
Size (bp) 121,373 119,299 117,720 122,234 120,859
 LSC length 66,648 65,052 64,648 65,892 65,105
 SSC length 54,197 53,775 52,067 55,444 54,920
 Residual IR length 264 426 262 449 417
 Pinaceae-specific repeatsa
  Type 1 Repeat (T1R) 1,186 1,335 1,286 1,314 1,098
% AT content 61.8 60.9 61.4 61.5 61.9
Total number of genes 113 114 113 113 112
 Number of protein-coding genesb 74 75 75 74 73
 Number of tRNA genes 35 35 34 35 35
 Number of rRNA genes 4 4 4 4 4
 Number of duplicated genes 4 5 5 4 3
  Within IR/T1R 1/3 1/4 1/4 1/3 1/2
a

Pinaceae-specific repeats identified by Wu, Lin, et al. (2011).

b

All ndh genes have been lost from the plastomes of all Pinaceous genera.

Both Pseudolarix and Tsuga plastomes have the A form gene order and contain a pair of T1Rs. However, the T1Rs differ between Pseudolarix and Tsuga, with the former containing a full length psbI gene and being 1,314 bp in length, which is remarkably longer than that of the latter (1,098 bp). Because repeats longer than 200 bp are effective substrates for homologous recombination (Day and Madesis 2007), the T1Rs of both Tsuga and Pseudolarix might also be capable of triggering homologous recombination. No type 2 or type 3 repeat was detected in the plastomes of both species.

Expansion of the AccD Reading Frame in Tsuga

The accD of Tsuga is 1,257 bp, which is longer than the average accD for other Pinaceous genera (969 ± 5 bp). The sequences of accD are highly conserved among the five representative Pinaceous genera (>75% similarity; see fig. 1A), with the exception of an about 300-bp insertion that is unique to Tsuga. This insertion is characterized by 23 repeats of the PD/H amino acids (fig. 1B).

Fig. 1.—

Fig. 1.—

Comparisons of accD between Tsuga and other Pinaceous genera. (A) mVISTA similarity plots of accD. Blank areas between 300 and 650 bp indicate an insertion specific to Tsuga. (B) Alignment of amino acid sequences showing PD/H tandem repeats in the insertion specific to Tsuga. Repeats are denoted with blue colored-boxes. The histogram below the aligned sequences indicates the level of sequence similarity.

In conifers, expansion of accD was previously discovered in Taiwania and Cephalotaxus with specific tandem repeats characterized by KKD(EY)CDNNE and SDIEED amino acids, respectively (Yi et al. 2013). Including the PD/H tandem repeats in Tsuga, tandem repeats within accD are diverse among conifers. These repeats might have high turnover rates, resembling those within ycf4 of legumes (Magee et al. 2010). Furthermore, Gurdon and Maliga (2014) suggested that in Medicago truncatula, the tandem repeats within accD are recombinationally active and variable among ten ecotypes. Therefore, the repeat is a good population genetic marker. The repeats we discovered in the accD of Tsuga may also be useful in population genetic study of the genus.

AccD codes for the carboxyl transferase β-subunit of the acetyl-CoA carboxylase protein, which is required in fatty acid synthesis (Sasaki and Nagano 2004) and plays a role in leaf development in tobacco (Kode et al. 2005). Positive selection for accD in some angiosperms was proposed to be associated with adaption to various environments (Hu et al. 2015). In Tsuga, we also detected positive selection (dN/dS = 79.04549, P = 0.0319) in the 3’ region of accD where the catalytic sites are located (supplementary fig. S2, Supplementary Material online; Lee et al. 2004); however, its impacts on the evolution of Tsuga require further evaluation.

Phylogeny of Ten Pinaceous Genera Revisited

Overall, 21 taxa were used in the phylogenetic analyses (table 2). Both maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI) trees have an identical topology (fig. 2), with almost all nodes being strongly supported with 100% bootstrap supports (BS) and 1.0 posterior possibility (PP), except for the trichotomy among Pinus, Picea, and Cathaya. The placement of Cathaya has been inconsistent among many studies; some placed it as sister to Picea (Wang et al. 2000; Lu et al. 2014) and others as sister to Pinus (e.g., Lin et al. 2010). Hence, it is best to regard the three closely related genera as a trichotomy (Nkolongo and Mehes-Smith 2012). Incorporating additional genes from either nuclear or mitochondrial genomes may resolve the trichotomy.

Table 2.

Plant Materials and GenBank Accession Numbers of the Plastid Genome Sequences used in the Phylogenetic Analysis

Species of interest Collection locality GenBank accession no. Voucher informationa
Pinaceae
Pinus koraiensis Siebold & Zucc. AY228468
Pinus thunbergii Parl. NC_001631
Cathaya argyrophylla Chun & Kuang Sanzhi District, Taiwan AB547400 Chaw 1486 (HAST)
Picea morrisonicola Hayata Xitou Nature Education Area, Taiwan AB480556 Chaw 1484 (HAST)
Larix decidua Mill. Yangmingshan National Park, Taiwan AB501189 Chaw 1485 (HAST)
Pseudotsuga sinensis var. wilsoniana (Hayata) L. K. Fu & Nan Li Wuling Farm, Taiwan AB601120 Chaw 1487 (HAST)
Abies koreana E. H. Wilson Jeju Island, South Korea KP742350 KHB1465044 (KH)
Keteleeria davidiana (Bertrand) Beissner Academia Sinica, Taiwan AP010820 Chaw 1482 (HAST)
Tsuga chinensis (Franch.) Pritzel ex Diels. Taipingshan Forest Park, Taiwan LC095866 Chaw 1494 (HAST)
Pseudolarix amabilis (J.Nelson) Rehder Sanzhi District, Taiwan LC095867 Chaw 1495 (HAST)
Cedrus deodara (Roxb.) G.Don Xitou Nature Education Area, Taiwan AB480043 Chaw 1483 (HAST)
Araucariaceae
Araucaria heterophylla (Salisb.) Franco University of Adelaide, Australia KM067155 EB1024 (ADU)
Agathis dammara (Lamb.) Rich. National Taiwan University, Taiwan AB830884 Chaw 1490 (HAST)
Podocarpaceae
Nageia nagi Thunb. O. Kuntze Academia Sinica, Taiwan AB830885 Chaw 1491 (HAST)
Podocarpus totara G.Benn. ex D.Don KC306742
Taxaceae
Amentotaxus formosana H.L. Li Dr. Cecilia Koo Botanic Conservation Center, Taiwan AP014574 Chaw 1493 (HAST)
Cephalotaxus wilsoniana Hayata Xitou Nature Education Area, Taiwan AP012265 Chaw 1492 (HAST)
Cupressaceae s.l.
Cunninghamia lanceolata (Lamb.) Hooker Longshan Forest Farm, China KC427270
Juniperus scopulorum Sarg. KF866299 Adams 13594 (BAYLU)
Ginkgoaceae
Ginkgo biloba L. Academia Sinica, Taiwan AB684440 Chaw 1488 (HAST)
Cycadaceae
Cycas taitungensis Shen, Hill, Tsou & Chen National Taiwan University, Taiwan AP009339 Chaw 1489 (HAST)
a

KH = Korea National Arboretum, South Korea; ADU = The University of Adelaide, Australia; HAST = Herbarium, Biodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan; BAYLU = Baylor University, United States.

Fig. 2.—

Fig. 2.—

Phylogenomic trees inferred from 65 plastid protein-coding genes. The tree framework is based on the ML tree. Values at nodes are arranged by bootstrap supports (BS) for RAxML and posterior probabilities (PP) for MrBayes. Only nodes with support less than 100% BS/1.0 PP are shown. Inset showed the high support of Pinus-Cathaya sisterhood (0.95 PP) based on the BI phylogeny.

Pseudolarix and Tsuga exhibited similar branch lengths to other Pinaceous genera (fig. 2), which generally have slower substitution rates than cupressophytes (Wu and Chaw 2015). Recent molecular studies (e.g., Lin et al. 2010; Lockwood et al. 2013; Lu et al. 2014) and the present results (fig. 2) congruently suggest two separate groups in Pinaceae; one is Abietoideae comprising Abies, Cedrus, Keteleeria, Pseudolarix, and Tsuga; the other consists of all non-Abietoideae genera, including Pinus, Cathaya, Picea, Pseudotsuga, and Larix. This molecular division agrees with the morphological studies of Van Tieghem (1891) and Price et al. (1987), who divided Pinaceae into Abietoid (Cédrées) and Pinoid (Pinées) groups.

Pseudolarix and Tsuga Are Sisters

In figure 2, Cedrus is the only genus that sisters to the clade of the other four Abietoideae genera (i.e., Abies, Keteleeria, Pseudolarix, and Tsuga). The sisterhood of Cedrus and other Abietoideae genera is fully supported (100% BS and 1.0 PP in fig. 2). The presumed alternative relationships, including Cedrus as sister to the other nine Pinaceous genera, the Abies—Keteleeria subclade, and the Tsuga—Pseudolarix subclade, were all rejected by the AU tests (supplementary table S1, Supplementary Material online). Thus, our data reaffirm the position of Cedrus as sister to the remaining Abietoideae genera (Gernandt et al. 2008; Lin et al. 2010; Lu et al. 2014), rather than to the other Pinaceous genera (Wang et al. 2000).

Our two trees congruently indicate the divergence of the other four genera of Abietoideae into two subclades: (1) Abies—Keteleeria and (2) Pseudolarix—Tsuga. Close sisterhood relationships between and within the two subclades received the maximal support (100% BS and 1.0 PP in fig. 2). The likelihood of alternative relationships previously proposed by other studies, such as the (Tsuga,(Pseudolarix,Keteleeria)) suggested by morphological studies (Frankis 1988; Farjon 1990) and (Tsuga,(Pseudolarix,(Abies,Keteleeria))) inferred from cladistics analysis (Hart 1987) and single-copy nuclear genes (Lu et al. 2014), were statistically different on the AU test (supplementary table S1, Supplementary Material online). Therefore, our work clearly supports the sisterhood of Pseudolarix and Tsuga and disagrees with any other alternatives.

Loss of PsaM as A Synapomorphy of Pseudolarix and Tsuga

Figure 3A shows a comparison of residual IRs among the Abietoideae genera. We reannotated the residual IR of Cedrus from 236 (Lin et al. 2010) to 426 bp. Excluding Abies and Keteleeria, the remaining three genera of Abietoideae have residual IRs that include 3’psbA and trnI-CAU. This suggests that the common ancestor of Abies and Keteleeria has shortened its residual IRs to exclude 3’psbA.

Fig. 3.—

Fig. 3.—

Characteristics of the residual IR and T1R in Abietoideae genera. (A) Comparisons of the residual IRs showing the IR contraction to exclude 3’psbA in Abies and Keteleeria. The residual IRs are denoted by grey bars. (B) Specific loss of psaM from the T1Rs of Pseudolarix and Tsuga. The T1Rs of each species are depicted by the green arrows with their lengths indicated. The presence or absence of psaM is marked with blue solid or dashed lines, respectively. Asterisks indicate intron-containing genes. (C) Simplified phylogeny depicting support of a sisterhood relationship between Pseudolarix-Tsuga and Abies-Keteleeria based on characteristics specified in (A) and (B).

In the Abietoideae genera, the T1Rs vary from 1,098 to 1,335 bp (table 1; fig. 3B). The T1R in Tsuga is the shortest, containing only partial psbI and lacking psaM. In contrast, although the T1R of Pseudolarix is the second longest, it also lacks psaM. Apparently, loss of psaM is a synapomorphic character inherited from the common ancestor of Tsuga and Pseudolarix (fig. 3C). Collectively, these data indicate that the characteristics of the residual IR and T1R have evolved phylogenetically, rather than randomly.

Conclusions

We reaffirm that the three common plastomic characters, i.e., short residual IRs, presence of a T1R, and loss of all plastid ndh genes, signify the plastomes of all Pinaceous genera. The A form observed in both sequenced plastomes also reinforces Wu, Lin, et al. preposition (2011) that the A form is the most primitive among Pinaceae plastomes. We discovered a unique insertion of PD/H tandem repeats that resulted in the expansion of accD in Tsuga, despite the underlying cause remains unclear. In addition, our plastid phylogenomics supports that the five genera of Abietoideae are monophyletic and that they split into (1) Cedrus alone and (2) two sister subclades, Pseudolarix—Tsuga and Abies—Keteleeria.

Material and Methods

Young leaves from T. chinensis (voucher Chaw 1494) and Pseudolarix amabilis (voucher Chaw 1495) were collected from Taipingshan Forest Park and Sanzhi District, Taiwan, respectively (table 2). Voucher specimens were deposited in the herbarium of Biodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei (HAST). Total DNA was extracted following the CTAB protocol (Stewart and Via 1993). P. amabilis was subjected to long-range polymerase chain reaction (PCR) following the protocol in Lin et al. (2010). T. chinensis was sequenced at Yourgene Bioscience (New Taipei City) using the Illumina GAII platform, producing 1 Gb of 100-bp paired-end reads.

Raw reads from T. chinensis were trimmed and de novo-assembled by using the CLC Genomics Workbench v5.5.1 (CLC Bio, Aarhus, Denmark). Contigs < 1 kb and <50× coverage were discarded. Plastome contigs were searched by using the blastn against the K. davidiana plastome with a threshold of E-value < 1010. Gaps between plastome contigs were closed with PCR using specific primers. The plastome of P. amabilis was assembled from 12 partially overlapping amplicons of 8–16 kb with >8× coverage. The complete plastome sequences were then annotated by using DOGMA (Wyman et al. 2004) and tRNAscan-SE 1.21 (Schattner et al. 2005) with default options. Plastome maps were drawn by using OGDraw (Lohse et al. 2013).

For phylogenetic analyses, a total of 21 taxa were sampled. The collection sites and GenBank accession information are provided in table 2. All protein-coding genes were extracted from the plastomes of 21 taxa and aligned using MUSCLE (Edgar 2004) implemented in MEGA6 (Tamura et al. 2013) with the Align Codons option and default parameters. We used SequenceMatrix (Vaidya et al. 2011) to concatenate the 65 protein-coding genes (supplementary table S2, Supplementary Material online) common to Pinaceae and selected outgroups. The ML and BI trees were constructed from the concatenated matrix by using raxmlGUI v1.3.1 (Silvestro and Michalak 2012) and MrBayes (Huelsenbeck and Ronquist 2001), respectively. ML analysis was conducted with the GTRGAMMA model, which was recommended by jModelTest v2.1.7 (Darriba et al. 2012). The node supports in the ML tree were estimated with 1,000 bootstrap replicates under a majority-rule consensus. The BI tree was evaluated under the GTRGAMMAI model suggested by MrModeltest v2.3 (Nylander 2004). The analysis was run for 1,000,000 generations and sampled every 100 generations, yielding 10,000 trees. The first 25% of trees were discarded as burn-in, and the remaining trees were used to estimate the Bayesian posterior probabilities.

The Approximately Unbiased (AU) test implemented in CONSEL 0.2 (Shimodaira and Hasegawa 2001) was used to assess the probability of alternative relationships among some discordant nodes. We used mVISTA (Frazer et al. 2004) to compare the sequence variability of accD among the representative Pinaceous genera with Tsuga as the reference. Tandem repeats were manually identified in regions of low similarity in the mVISTA plot. Positive selection of accD was detected by using CODEML of pamlX (Xu and Yang 2013) with the branch-site model A (Yang 2007). The branch leading to Tsuga was specified as a foreground branch and the likelihood values of the alternative and null models were calculated by using the options of seqtype = 1, runmode = 0, CodonFreq = 2, model = 2, NSsites = 2, omega = 1 and either fix_omega = 0 (alternative model) or fix_omega = 1 (null model). The likelihood ratio test (LRT) was used to test model fit.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by research grants from the Investigator’s Award of Academia Sinica, the Ministry of Science and Technology Taiwan MOST103-2621-B-001-007-MY3 (to S.-M.C), and the Taiwan International Graduate Program Student Fellowship (to E.S.). We are grateful to the two anonymous reviewers for their critical reading and helpful suggestions in improving the manuscript.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary figures S1, S2 and table S1 are available at Genome Biology and Evolution online (http://www.gbe.oxfordjournals.org/).

Literature Cited

  1. Braukmann TW, Kuzmina M, Stefanović S. 2009. Loss of all plastid ndh genes in Gnetales and conifers: extent and evolutionary significance for the seed plant phylogeny. Curr Genet. 55(3):323–337. doi:10.1007/s00294-009-0249-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Darriba D, Taboada G, Doallo R, Posada D. 2012. jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat Methods. 9:772–772. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Day A, Madesis P. 2007. DNA replication, recombination, and repair in plastids In: Bock R, editor. Cell and molecular biology of plastids. Topics in current genetics. Vol. 19. Heidelberg (Germany: ): Springer; p. 65–119. [Google Scholar]
  4. Edgar RC. 2004. MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity. BMC Bioinformatics. 5:113. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-5-113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Farjon A. 1990. Pinaceae: drawings and descriptions of the genera Abies, Cedrus, Pseudolarix, Keteleeria, Nothotsuga, Tsuga, Cathaya, Pseudotsuga, Larix and Picea. Konigstein: Koeltz Scientific Books. [Google Scholar]
  6. Frankis MP. 1988. Generic inter-relationships in Pinaceae. Notes R Bot Gard Edinb. 45:527–548. [Google Scholar]
  7. Frazer KA, Pachter L, Poliakov A, Rubin EM, Dubchak I. 2004. VISTA: computational tools for comparative genomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 32:W273–W279. doi:10.1093/nar/gkh458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gernandt DS, et al. 2008. Use of simultaneous analyses to guide fossil‐based calibrations of Pinaceae phylogeny. Int J Plant Sci. 169:1086–1099. doi:10.1086/590472. [Google Scholar]
  9. Gurdon C, Maliga P. 2014. Two distinct plastid genome configurations and unprecedented intraspecies length variation in the accD coding region in Medicago truncatula. DNA Res. 21:417–427. doi:10.1093/dnares/dsu007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hart JA. 1987. A cladistic analysis of conifers: preliminary results. J Arn Arb. 68:269–307. [Google Scholar]
  11. Havill NP, et al. 2008. Phylogeny and Biogeography of Tsuga (Pinaceae) Inferred from Nuclear Ribosomal ITS and Chloroplast DNA Sequence Data. Syst Bot. 33:478–489. doi:10.1600/036364408785679770. [Google Scholar]
  12. Hu S, et al. 2015. Plastome organization and evolution of chloroplast genes in Cardamine species adapted to contrasting habitats. BMC Genomics 16:306. doi:10.1186/s12864-015-1498-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F. 2001. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17:754–755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Jansen RK, Ruhlman TA. 2012. Plastid genomes of seed plants In: Bock R, Knoop V, editors. Genomics of chloroplasts and mitochondria, advances in photosynthesis and respiration, vol. 35. Heidelberg (Germany: ): Springer; pp. 103–126. [Google Scholar]
  15. Kode V, Mudd EA, Iamtham S, Day A. 2005. The tobacco plastid accD gene is essential and is required for leaf development. Plant J. 44:237–244. doi:10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02533.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lee SS, et al. 2004. Characterization of the plastid-encoded carboxyltransferase subunit (accD) gene of potato. Mol Cells 17:422–429. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. LePage BA, Basinger JF. 1995. Evolutionary history of the genus Pseudolarix Gordon (Pinaceae). Int J Plant Sci. 156:910–950. [Google Scholar]
  18. Lin CP, Huang JP, Wu CS, Hsu CY, Chaw SM. 2010. Comparative chloroplast genomics reveals the evolution of Pinaceae genera and subfamilies. Genome Biol Evol. 2:504–517. doi:10.1093/gbe/evq036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lockwood JD, et al. 2013. A new phylogeny for the genus Picea from plastid, mitochondrial, and nuclear sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 69:717–727. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2013.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lohse M, Drechsel O, Kahlau S, Bock R. 2013. OrganellarGenomeDRAW – a suite of tools for generating physical maps of plastid and mitochondrial genomes and visualizing expression data sets. Nucleic Acids Res. 41:W575–W581. doi:10.1093/nar/gkt289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lu Y, Ran JH, Guo DM, Yang ZY, Wang XQ. 2014. Phylogeny and divergence times of gymnosperms inferred from single-copy nuclear genes. PLoS ONE 9:e107679. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0107679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Magee AM, et al. 2010. Localized hypermutation and associated gene losses in legume chloroplast genomes. Genome Res. 20:1700–1710. doi:10.1101/gr.111955.110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Nkolongo KK, Mehes-Smith M. 2012. Karyotype evolution in the Pinaceae: implication with molecular phylogeny. Genome 55:735–753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Nylander JAA. 2004. MrModeltest v2. Program distributed by the author. Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University.
  25. Price RA, Olsen-Stojkovich J, Lowenstein JM. 1987. Relationships among the genera of Pinaceae: An immunological comparison. Syst Bot. 12:91–97. [Google Scholar]
  26. Ruhfel BR, Gitzendanner MA, Soltis PS, Soltis DE, Burleigh JG. 2014. From algae to angiosperms–inferring the phylogeny of green plants (Viridiplantae) from 360 plastid genomes. BMC Evol Biol. 14:23.. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Sasaki Y, Nagano Y. 2004. Plant acetyl-CoA carboxylase: structure, biosynthesis, regulation, and gene manipulation for plant breeding. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 68:1175–1184. doi:10.1271/bbb.68.1175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Schattner P, Brooks AN, Lowe TM. 2005. The tRNAscan-SE, snoscan and snoGPS web servers for the detection of tRNAs and snoRNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 33:W686–W689. doi:10.1093/nar/gki366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Shimodaira H, Hasegawa M. 2001. CONSEL: for assessing the confidence of phylogenetic tree selection. Bioinformatics 17:1246–1247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Silvestro D, Michalak I. 2012. raxmlGUI: a graphical front-end for RAxML. Organ Diver Evol. 12:335–337. doi:10.1007/s13127-011-0056-0. [Google Scholar]
  31. Stewart CN, Via LE. 1993. A rapid CTAB DNA isolation technique useful for RAPD fingerprinting and other PCR applications. BioTechniques 14:748–750. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. 2013. MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol. 30:2725–2729. doi:10.1093/molbev/mst197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Thieret JW. 1993. Pinaceae In: Flora of North America Editorial Committee, editors. Flora of North America North of Mexico Vol. 2. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press; pp. 3523–98. [Google Scholar]
  34. Vaidya G, Lohman DJ, Meier R. 2011. SequenceMatrix: concatenation software for the fast assembly of multi-gene datasets with character set and codon information. Cladistics 27:171–180. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2010.00329.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Van Tieghem P. 1891. Structure et affinities des Abies et des genres les plus voisins. Bull Soc Bot Fr. 38:406–415. [Google Scholar]
  36. Wang XQ, Tank DC, Sang T. 2000. Phylogeny and divergence times in Pinaceae: evidence from three genomes. Mol Biol Evol. 17:773–781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Wu CS, Chaw SM. 2015. Evolutionary stasis in cycad plastomes and the first case of plastome GC-biased gene conversion. Genome Biol Evol. doi:10.1093/gbe/evv125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Wu CS, Wang YN, Hsu CY, Lin CP, Chaw SM. 2011. Loss of different inverted repeat copies from the chloroplast genomes of Pinaceae and cupressophytes and influence of heterotachy on the evaluation of gymnosperm phylogeny. Genome Biol Evol. 3:1284–1295. doi:10.1093/gbe/evr095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Wu CS, Lin CP, Hsu CY, Wang RJ, Chaw SM. 2011. Comparative chloroplast genomes of Pinaceae: insights into the mechanism of diversified genomic organizations. Genome Biol Evol. 3:309–319. doi:10.1093/gbe/evr026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Wu CS, Wang YN, Liu SM, Chaw SM. 2007. Chloroplast genome (cpDNA) of Cycas taitungensis and 56 cp protein-coding genes of Gnetum parvifolium: Insights into cpDNA evolution and phylogeny of extant seed plants. Mol Biol Evol. 24(6):1366–1379. doi:10.1093/molbev/msm059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Wyman SK, Jansen RK, Boore JL. 2004. Automatic annotation of organellar genomes with DOGMA. Bioinformatics 20:3252–3255. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bth352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Xu B, Yang Z. 2013. PAMLX: a graphical user interface for PAML. Mol Biol Evol. 30:2723–2724. doi:10.1093/molbev/mst179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Yang Z. 2007. PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol Biol Evol. 24(8):1586–1591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Yi X, Gao L, Wang B, Su YJ, Wang T. 2013. The complete chloroplast genome sequence of Cephalotaxus oliveri (Cephalotaxaceae): evolutionary comparison of cephalotaxus chloroplast DNAs and insights into the loss of inverted repeat copies in gymnosperms. Genome Biol Evol. 5:688–698. doi:10.1093/gbe/evt042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genome Biology and Evolution are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES