Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Pathology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Pathology
. 1981 Oct;34(10):1110–1113. doi: 10.1136/jcp.34.10.1110

Appraisal in the diagnostic laboratory of three commercially available anaerobic cabinets

KD Phillips 1, AT Willis 1
PMCID: PMC494375  PMID: 7031095

Abstract

Three commercially available anaerobic cabinets are described and their performance in relation to one another and to a standard anaerobic jar technique are reported upon from a clinical laboratory.

Full text

PDF
1110

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Arank A., Syed S. A., Kenney E. B., Freter R. Isolation of anaerobic bacteria from human gingiva and mouse cecum by means of a simplified glove box procedure. Appl Microbiol. 1969 Apr;17(4):568–576. doi: 10.1128/am.17.4.568-576.1969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Burt R., Phillips K. D. A new anaerobic jar. J Clin Pathol. 1977 Nov;30(11):1082–1084. doi: 10.1136/jcp.30.11.1082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ferguson I. R., Phillips K. D., Willis A. T. An evaluation of the 'GasKit' disposable hydrogen and carbon dioxide generator for the culture of anaerobic bacteria. J Appl Bacteriol. 1976 Dec;41(3):433–437. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1976.tb00656.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Killgore G. E., Starr S. E., Del Bene V. E., Whaley D. N., Dowell V. R., Jr Comparison of three anaerobic systems for the isolation of anaerobic bacteria from clinical specimens. Am J Clin Pathol. 1973 Apr;59(4):552–559. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/59.4.552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Tabaqchali S., Peach S., Snedden W. Mass spectral measurement of residual oxygen in the atmosphere of an anaerobic culture chamber. J Clin Microbiol. 1978 Sep;8(3):339–341. doi: 10.1128/jcm.8.3.339-341.1978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Watt B., Collee J. G., Brown R. The isolation of strict anaerobes: the use of an anaerobic cabinet compared with a conventional procedure. J Med Microbiol. 1974 Aug;7(3):315–324. doi: 10.1099/00222615-7-3-315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Pathology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES