Skip to main content
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases logoLink to PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
. 2016 Jul 14;10(7):e0004720. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004720

In Vitro and In Vivo Miltefosine Susceptibility of a Leishmania amazonensis Isolate from a Patient with Diffuse Cutaneous Leishmaniasis: Follow-Up

Adriano C Coelho 1,¤, Cristiana T Trinconi 1, Carlos H N Costa 2, Silvia R B Uliana 1,*
Editor: Charles L Jaffe3
PMCID: PMC4945063  PMID: 27416021

Miltefosine is the most efficacious oral drug available for the treatment of leishmaniasis. While miltefosine has been in use in India for the treatment of visceral leishmaniasis for a number of years [1], its application to the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis is still under investigation [24]. We recently reported that miltefosine was effective in the treatment of Leishmania amazonensis infections in a mouse experimental model [5]. Those results were obtained in BALB/c mice infected with two different L. amazonensis strains: a type strain (M2269) and an isolate obtained from a patient with diffuse cutaneous leishmaniasis (2506). Five weeks after infection, treatment was initiated when lesions on the hind left footpad were apparent. Miltefosine 13 mg/kg/day was given orally for 15 consecutive days to groups composed of five mice. The animals infected with M2269 or 2506 parasites were considered clinically cured at the end of treatment. One week after the end of treatment, the mice were humanely killed for parasitological examination. Histopathological examinations of the infection site and limiting dilution assays performed with the footpad tissue revealed an absence of parasites [5]. Clinical follow-up for 15 weeks after the end of the treatment showed no signs of relapse. These results were considered as evidence that treatment with miltefosine in this murine model of cutaneous leishmaniasis, a model of extreme susceptibility, was highly efficacious.

Subsequently, one of the groups described, consisting of four remaining mice infected with the M2269 strain and treated with the same dose of miltefosine, was followed up for a longer period. These animals relapsed from the 23rd week post-infection. Lesions became apparent in all four mice and appeared individually in weeks 23, 36, 39, and 39 post-infection. At these times, parasites were recovered from lesions, and the susceptibility to miltefosine was determined, as described by Coelho et al. [5]. No significant changes in drug susceptibility were found, indicating that there was no acquired resistance to miltefosine during therapy.

Furthermore, we reported that the diffuse cutaneous leishmaniasis patient from which the 2506 strain had been isolated was responding well to miltefosine and pentamidine combined therapy [5]. However, after 18 months the disease reoccurred, requiring a new course of treatment. Previous clinical studies also described the occurrence of relapses after miltefosine chemotherapy in patients with diffuse cutaneous leishmaniasis [6,7].

Parasite persistence after treatment with various drugs has been described [811] and may, in fact, be the rule in leishmaniasis. The relapses observed in this group of mice indicate that the techniques used in our previous report to characterize the parasite burden (histopathology and limiting dilution) lack the sensitivity to detect these remaining or quiescent parasites. We believe these findings are significant to the data previously reported.

Funding Statement

This work was funded by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP, 2011/20484-7 and 2015/09080-2) and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq, 473343/2012-6). ACC and CTT are supported by FAPESP fellowships 2012/14629-5 and 2011/18858-6, respectively. SRBU is the recipient of a senior researcher scholarship from CNPq. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Sundar S, Jha TK, Thakur CP, Engel J, Sindermann H, et al. (2002) Oral miltefosine for Indian visceral leishmaniasis. N Engl J Med 347: 1739–1746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Soto J, Berman J (2006) Treatment of New World cutaneous leishmaniasis with miltefosine. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 100 Suppl 1: S34–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dorlo TP, Balasegaram M, Beijnen JH, de Vries PJ (2012) Miltefosine: a review of its pharmacology and therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of leishmaniasis. J Antimicrob Chemother 67:2576–2597. doi: 10.1093/jac/dks275 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.PAHO. Leishmaniasis en las Americas: recomendaciones para el tratamiento. 2013. http://www.paho.org/hq/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_view&gid=22226&Itemid.
  • 5.Coelho AC, Trinconi CT, Costa CH, Uliana SR (2014) In Vitro and In Vivo Miltefosine Susceptibility of a Leishmania amazonensis Isolate from a Patient with Diffuse Cutaneous Leishmaniasis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 8: e2999 doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002999 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Calvopina M, Gomez EA, Sindermann H, Cooper PJ, Hashiguchi Y (2006) Relapse of new world diffuse cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania (Leishmania) mexicana after miltefosine treatment. Am J Trop Med Hyg 75: 1074–1077. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zerpa O, Ulrich M, Blanco B, Polegre M, Avila A, et al. (2007) Diffuse cutaneous leishmaniasis responds to miltefosine but then relapses. Brit J Dermatol 156: 1328–1335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Schubach A, Marzochi MC, Cuzzi-Maya T, Oliveira AV, Araujo ML, et al. (1998) Cutaneous scars in American tegumentary leishmaniasis patients: a site of Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis persistence and viability eleven years after antimonial therapy and clinical cure. Am J Trop Med Hyg 58:824–827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mendonça MG, de Brito ME, Rodrigues EH, Bandeira V, Jardim ML, Abath FG. (2004) Persistence of leishmania parasites in scars after clinical cure of American cutaneous leishmaniasis: is there a sterile cure? J Infect Dis 189: 1018–1023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Coutinho SG, Pirmez C, Da-Cruz AM. Parasitological and immunological follow-up of American tegumentary leishmaniasis patients (2002) Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 96 Suppl 1:S173–178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Vergel C, Palacios R, Cadena H, Posso CJ, Valderrama L, et al. (2006) Evidence for Leishmania (Viannia) parasites in the skin and blood of patients before and after treatment. J Infect Dis 194:503–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES