Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry logoLink to Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry
. 1974 Jan;37(1):47–54. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.37.1.47

Disturbances in the voluntary recruitment order of anterior tibial motor units in bradykinesia of Parkinsonism 1

Lennart Grimby 1, Jan Hannerz 1
PMCID: PMC494562  PMID: 4813427

Abstract

The recruitment of motor units is studied with an electromyographic technique for secure identification of single motor unit potentials. It has been shown in previous studies that the recruitment order is different in tonic and in phasic activities; in tonic activity the recruitment order is stable and low frequency units are always recruited before high frequency units; in phasic activity, however, the recruitment order is unstable and units with a higher frequency range may be recruited before units with lower frequency range. In this investigation the shifts between tonic and phasic recruitment order in voluntary contraction were compared in normal subjects and in patients with severe bradykinesia of Parkinsonism. Upon initiation of a voluntary contraction in a normal subject, phasic recruitment order may be used for a few 100 msec but tonic recruitment order then takes over. In bradykinetic patients, however, this shift from phasic to tonic recruitment order is delayed. After termination of tonic voluntary contraction in a normal subject, phasic recruitment order can again be used after a few seconds. In bradykinetic patients, however, the shift back from tonic to phasic recruitment order is also delayed. In favourable experimental situations the shift from phasic to tonic recruitment order can be normalized by passive stretch of the muscle and the shift from tonic to phasic recruitment pattern by unloading the muscle. It is discussed whether the pathological recruitment in bradykinesia might be due to disturbed gamma loop function.

Full text

PDF
47

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ashworth B., Grimby L., Kugelberg E. Comparison of voluntary and reflex activation of motor units. Functional organization of motor neurones. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1967 Apr;30(2):91–98. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.30.2.91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Buchthal F., Schmalbruch H. Contraction times and fibre types in intact human muscle. Acta Physiol Scand. 1970 Aug;79(4):435–452. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1970.tb04744.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. ECCLES J. C., ECCLES R. M., LUNDBERG A. The action potentials of the alpha motoneurones supplying fast and slow muscles. J Physiol. 1958 Jul 14;142(2):275–291. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1958.sp006015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Edström L., Grimby L., Hannerz J. Correlation between recruitment order of motor units and muscle atrophy pattern in upper motoneurone lesion: significance of spasticity. Experientia. 1973 May 15;29(5):560–561. doi: 10.1007/BF01926664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Edström L., Kugelberg E. Histochemical composition, distribution of fibres and fatiguability of single motor units. Anterior tibial muscle of the rat. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1968 Oct;31(5):424–433. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.31.5.424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. GRANIT R., PHILLIPS C. G., SKOGLUND S., STEG G. Differentiation of tonic from phasic alpha ventral horn cells by stretch, pinna and crossed extensor reflexes. J Neurophysiol. 1957 Sep;20(5):470–481. doi: 10.1152/jn.1957.20.5.470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Grimby L., Hannerz J. Differences in recruitment order of motor units in phasic and tonic flexion reflex in "spinal man". J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1970 Oct;33(5):562–570. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.33.5.562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Grimby L., Hannerz J. Recruitment order of motor units on voluntary contraction: changes induced by proprioceptive afferent activity. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1968 Dec;31(6):565–573. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.31.6.565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. HENNEMAN E., OLSON C. B. RELATIONS BETWEEN STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION IN THE DESIGN OF SKELETAL MUSCLES. J Neurophysiol. 1965 May;28:581–598. doi: 10.1152/jn.1965.28.3.581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hagbarth K. E., Hongell A., Wallin G. Parkinson's disease: afferent muscle nerve activity in rigid patients. A preliminary report. Acta Soc Med Ups. 1970;75(1-2):70–76. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hannerz J. Discharge properties of motor units in man. Experientia. 1973 May 1;29(1):45–46. doi: 10.1007/BF01913242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hannerz J., Grimby L. Recruitment order of motor units in man: significance of pre-existing state of facilitation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1973 Apr;36(2):275–281. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.36.2.275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. RUSHWORTH G. Spasticity and rigidity: an experimental study and review. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1960 May;23:99–118. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.23.2.99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES