Skip to main content
Genome Announcements logoLink to Genome Announcements
. 2016 Jul 14;4(4):e00603-16. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00603-16

Draft Genome Sequence of Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica Serovar Lille Strain CRJJGF_000101 (Phylum Gammaproteobacteria)

Sushim K Gupta a, Elizabeth A McMillan a,b, Charlene R Jackson a, Prerak T Desai c, Steffen Porwollik c, Michael McClelland c, Lari M Hiott a, Shaheen B Humayoun a, Jonathan G Frye a,
PMCID: PMC4945789  PMID: 27417829

Abstract

Here, we report a 4.98 Mbp draft genome sequence of Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Lille strain CRJJGF_000101, isolated from ground beef in 2007.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Salmonellosis is a major public-health concern worldwide. Consumption of raw or improperly prepared or contaminated foods, mostly of animal origin, is considered the major route of human salmonellosis (1). There are more than 2,500 serovars of Salmonella, exhibiting more than 46 different O groups and 114 different H groups; all of them are considered a potential threat to human health (2). The Salmonella strain CRJJGF_000101 was isolated from ground beef in 2007 using standard microbiology techniques and serotyped using SMART (3). The isolate was serogrouped using serogroup-specific antisera (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, MI) and the serovar was determined at the National Veterinary Services Laboratories, APHIS, USDA (Ames, IA). This bacterium belonged to antigenic group O:7(C1), along with Salmonella serovar Rumford, and contained somatic O antigen 7 and only phase1 flagellar H antigens z38 (7:z38:-) (4). Using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) as described by PulseNet (5), the isolate was assigned PFGE pattern LPPX01.0020. MICs (µg/ml) were determined by broth microdilution using the Sensititre semi-automated antimicrobial susceptibility system (TREK Diagnostics Systems, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Oakwood Village, OH). Results were interpreted according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines (6).

The genomic DNA was isolated using a GenElute bacterial genomic DNA kit (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) and the DNA library was constructed using a Nextera-XT DNA preparation kit and paired-end sequencing was performed on an Illumina HiSeq2500 (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA) using a 500-cycle MiSeq reagent kit. About 4,304,692 reads with quality score >30 were assembled using Velvet assembler (7), which resulted in 196 contigs with minimum contig length ≥200 bp. The total assembly size was 4.98 Mbp, with N50 values of 70.7 kbp, and G+C content of 51.98%. The contigs were ordered with MAUVE using Salmonella LT2 as a reference (8), and prodigal (9) and ARAGORN (10) were used to predict coding sequences (CDS) and tRNAs. A total of 4,764 coding sequences (≥50 amino acids) and 48 tRNAs were predicted within the genome. Prophages, signal peptides, and resistance genes were predicted using PHAST (11), signalp (12), and ARG-ANNOT (13), respectively. We identified signal peptides in 462 genes, two clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) (14) loci, and 5-intact/6-incomplete phages in the genome. We detected an aac6-Iaa resistance gene, which remains cryptic and a tetracycline resistance gene tetC, which was confirmed phenotypically. The detected arsenic resistance genes (pstBACS) (15) correlated with the phenotypes. The strain’s MIC was 411 and 58 µg/ml compared to a wild type median MIC, of 51 and 15 µg/ml for arsenate and arsenite, respectively. The pathogenesis analysis of Salmonella serovar Lille in the mouse model categorized the strain in the low invasive group (16). However, Salmonella serovar Lille has been reported during salmonellosis outbreaks (17). Host specific invasion may be the reason for low invasiveness in mice. The information generated from the genome may enhance our understanding of the variations in the virulence genes for host specific infection.

Nucleotide sequence accession number.

The genome sequence of Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Lille strain CRJJGF_000101 has been deposited in GenBank under the accession number JQWF00000000. This paper describes the first version of the genome.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Calvin Williams for all the technical support.

J.G.F. and C.R.J. were supported by USDA projects 6040-32000-006-00 and 6040-32000-009-00, and a grant from the Foundation for Meat and Poultry Research and Education. M.M. was supported in part by NIH grants R01AI052237, AI039557 AI052237, AI073971, AI075093, AI077645 AI083646, USDA grants 2009-03579 and 2011-67017-30127, the Binational Agricultural Research and Development Fund, and a grant from the Center for Produce Safety.

The mention of trade names or commercial products in this article is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

Funding Statement

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Footnotes

Citation Gupta SK, McMillan EA, Jackson CR, Desai PT, Porwollik S, McClelland M, Hiott LM, Humayoun SB, Frye JG. 2016. Draft genome sequence of Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Lille strain CRJJGF_000101 (phylum Gammaproteobacteria). Genome Announc 4(4):e00603-16. doi:10.1128/genomeA.00603-16.

REFERENCES

  • 1.D’Aoust JY. 1991. Pathogenicity of foodborne Salmonella. Int J Food Microbiol 12:17–40. doi: 10.1016/0168-1605(91)90045-Q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Malorny B, Hauser E, Dieckmann R. 2011. New approaches in subspecies-level Salmonella classification, p. 1–23. In Porwollik S. (ed). Salmonella from genome to function. Caister Academic Press, Norfolk, United Kingdom. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Leader BT, Frye JG, Hu J, Fedorka-Cray PJ, Boyle DS. 2009. High-throughput molecular determination of Salmonella enterica serovars by use of multiplex PCR and capillary electrophoresis analysis. J Clin Microbiol 47:1290–1299. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02095-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Grimont P, Weill F. 2007. Antigenic formulae of the Salmonella serovars. 9th ed WHO Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Salmonella, Geneva, Switzerland: https://www.pasteur.fr/sites/www.pasteur.fr/files/wklm_en.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gerner-Smidt P, Hise K, Kincaid J, Hunter S, Rolando S, Hyytiä-Trees E, Ribot EM, Swaminathan B, Pulsenet Taskforce . 2006. PulseNet USA: a five-year update. Foodborne Pathog Dis 3:9–19. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2006.3.9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute 2015. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing: 25th informational supplement (m100–S25). Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zerbino DR, Birney E. 2008. Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res 18:821–829. doi: 10.1101/gr.074492.107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Rissman AI, Mau B, Biehl BS, Darling AE, Glasner JD, Perna NT. 2009. Reordering contigs of draft genomes using the Mauve aligner. Bioinformatics 25:2071–2073. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hyatt D, Chen GL, Locascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW, Hauser LJ. 2010. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics 11:119. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Laslett D, Canback B. 2004. ARAGORN, a program to detect tRNA genes and tmRNA genes in nucleotide sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 32:11–16. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zhou Y, Liang Y, Lynch KH, Dennis JJ, Wishart DS. 2011. PHAST: a fast phage search tool. Nucleic Acids Res 39:W347–W352. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Petersen TN, Brunak S, von Heijne G, Nielsen H. 2011. SignalP 4.0: discriminating signal peptides from transmembrane regions. Nat Methods 8:785–786. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gupta SK, Padmanabhan BR, Diene SM, Lopez-Rojas R, Kempf M, Landraud L, Rolain JM. 2014. Arg-Annot, a new bioinformatic tool to discover antibiotic resistance genes in bacterial genomes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:212–220. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01310-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Grissa I, Vergnaud G, Pourcel C. 2007. CRISPRFinder: a web tool to identify clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats. Nucleic Acids Res 35:W52–W57. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Pal C, Bengtsson-Palme J, Rensing C, Kristiansson E, Larsson DG. 2014. BacMet: antibacterial biocide and metal resistance genes database. Nucleic Acids Res 42:D737–D743. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.McWhorter AR, Davos D, Chousalkar KK. 2015. Pathogenicity of Salmonella strains isolated from egg shells and the layer farm environment in Australia. Appl Environ Microbiol 81:405–414. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02931-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lehmacher A, Bockemühl J, Aleksic S. 1995. Nationwide outbreak of human salmonellosis in Germany due to contaminated paprika and paprika-powdered potato chips. Epidemiol Infect 115:501–511. doi: 10.1017/S0950268800058660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genome Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES