Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Pathology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Pathology
. 1981 Dec;34(12):1396–1399. doi: 10.1136/jcp.34.12.1396

Comparison of a modified microagglutination technique for HBsAg with the standard technique and a new RIA system.

E M Supran, P S Gardner, I Cayzer, G Court, S Chalmers
PMCID: PMC494616  PMID: 7328187

Abstract

A further modification of the standard RPHA technique (Hepatest, Wellcome Reagents) for the detection of HBsAg is described. This modification does not require a centrifugation step which is required by the other modifications that have been described previously and consequently takes a little longer to perform. It does, however, retain the advantages of increased sensitivity and decreased costs which are also features of the other modifications. A series of 939 routine clinical specimens were used to evaluate the method described and to evaluate a new RIA kit for the detection of HBsAg (Hepatube, Wellcome Reagents). Of 53 specimens found to be positive for HBsAg by RIA, 50 (94% were detected by the modified Hepatest RPHA as opposed to 47 (89%) by the standard technique.

Full text

PDF
1396

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Archer A. C. An improved haemagglutination technique for the detection of hepatitis Bs antigen. Med Lab Sci. 1977 Oct;34(4):345–350. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barbara J. A., Howell D. R., Cleghorn T. E., Cameron C. H., Briggs M., Dane D. S. A comparison of different methods of screening blood donations for HBsAg. Vox Sang. 1977;32(1):4–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.1977.tb00597.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cayzer I., Dane D. S., Cameron C. H., Denning J. V. A rapid haemagglutination test for hepatitis-B antigen. Lancet. 1974 May 18;1(7864):947–949. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(74)91259-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Pathology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES