Skip to main content
The Journal of Biological Chemistry logoLink to The Journal of Biological Chemistry
. 2016 May 24;291(29):15185–15195. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M116.727180

Structural Insights into an Oxalate-producing Serine Hydrolase with an Unusual Oxyanion Hole and Additional Lyase Activity*

Juntaek Oh 1, Ingyu Hwang 1, Sangkee Rhee 1,1
PMCID: PMC4946933  PMID: 27226606

Abstract

In Burkholderia species, the production of oxalate, an acidic molecule, is a key event for bacterial growth in the stationary phase. Oxalate plays a central role in maintaining environmental pH, which counteracts inevitable population-collapsing alkaline toxicity in amino acid-based culture medium. In the phytopathogen Burkholderia glumae, two enzymes are responsible for oxalate production. First, the enzyme oxalate biosynthetic component A (ObcA) catalyzes the formation of a tetrahedral C6-CoA adduct from the substrates acetyl-CoA and oxaloacetate. Then the ObcB enzyme liberates three products from the C6-CoA adduct: oxalate, acetoacetate, and CoA. Interestingly, these two stepwise reactions are catalyzed by a single bifunctional enzyme, Obc1, from Burkholderia thailandensis and Burkholderia pseudomallei. Obc1 has an ObcA-like N-terminal domain and shows ObcB activity in its C-terminal domain despite no sequence homology with ObcB. We report the crystal structure of Obc1 in its apo and glycerol-bound form at 2.5 Å and 2.8 Å resolution, respectively. The Obc1 N-terminal domain is essentially identical both in structure and function to that of ObcA. Its C-terminal domain has an α/β hydrolase fold that has a catalytic triad for oxalate production and a novel oxyanion hole distinct from the canonical HGGG motif in other α/β hydrolases. Functional analyses through mutagenesis studies suggested that His-934 is an additional catalytic acid/base for its lyase activity and liberates two additional products, acetoacetate and CoA. These results provide structural and functional insights into bacterial oxalogenesis and an example of divergent evolution of the α/β hydrolase fold, which has both hydrolase and lyase activity.

Keywords: acetyl coenzyme A (acetyl-CoA), crystal structure, enzyme catalysis, protein structure, quorum sensing, Burkholderia thailandensis, catalytic triad, oxalate biosynthetic component, public goods, serine hydrolase

Introduction

Bacteria produce and secrete a wide range of chemicals that can be beneficial to their survival in different environments (14). In particular, some molecules often referred to as “public goods” provide a fitness advantage for the whole population, including individuals (i.e. exploiters) that lack the ability to synthesize these molecules. Accordingly, the metabolic costs for producing public goods usually outweigh the benefits, unless the population of bacteria is very large. Therefore, the production of public goods occurs cooperatively in a population-dependent manner by quorum sensing. Bacterial quorum sensing is mediated via diffusible small chemicals, which can sense population density and respond to environmental changes during population growth (5, 6).

In Burkholderia species, quorum sensing-mediated oxalogenesis is an indispensable cellular event for survival during the stationary growth phase (1, 7). Oxalate is a highly acidic molecule that serves as a public good and plays a central role in maintaining pH homeostasis. Without oxalate, the whole population of Burkholderia species would collapse due to ammonia-mediated alkaline toxicity during the stationary growth phase.

In Burkholderia glumae and Burkholderia cepacia, oxalate production is mediated by a two-step enzymatic reaction (Fig. 1A) (810). The first enzyme, oxalate biosynthetic component A (ObcA),2 catalyzes the formation of a C6-CoA adduct, using acetyl-CoA and oxaloacetate as substrates (10). A second enzyme, ObcB, is responsible for the production of three different products, namely, oxalate, acetoacetate, and CoA. A tetrahedral C6-CoA adduct was proposed to be a product of ObcA (10), and the C2-C3 and C4-S bonds in the C6-CoA adduct are cleaved by ObcB (Fig. 1A). Interestingly, in Burkholderia thailandensis, Burkholderia pseudomallei, and Burkholderia mallei, the bifunctional enzyme Obc1 catalyzes these two reactions (11). Given that Obc1 functionally complements ObcA and ObcB, it is not surprising that it contains activities of both enzymes. The N-terminal domain of Obc1 exhibits 52% identity with the amino acid sequence of ObcA (10, 11) (Fig. 2); however, the Obc1 C-terminal domain does not show any sequence homology with ObcB even though it exhibits functional identity with ObcB.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1.

The overall reaction scheme of oxalogenesis in Burkholderia species and the structure of Obc1. A, in B. glumae, the two enzymes ObcA and ObcB are involved in oxalogenesis using acetyl-CoA and oxaloacetate as substrates (10), whereas in B. thailandensis, two domains in Obc1 mediate oxalogenesis. For convenience, atoms in oxaloacetate are colored according to the final products, and carbon atoms in the C6 moiety of the C6-CoA adduct are numbered. B, the overall structure of Obc1 in apo form is shown with its N-domain (green). The C-domain consists of two regions: a cap domain (cyan) and an α/β hydrolase fold (magenta). For clarity, β-strands are indicated in blue, except β1 (red) in the N-domain. The proposed active sites of the C-domain are located in a crevice between the cap domain and the α/β hydrolase fold, and the position of the catalytic Ser-935 residue near helix α30 is marked with an asterisk in black. In this orientation, the active site of the C-domain is directed out of the page, directly toward readers, but an opening to the active site of the N-domain is oriented by 180° relative to the C-domain. The active site of the N-domain is indicated with a metal ion in a black sphere. C, the N-domain is shown in a different orientation from that of panel B. The (β/α)8-barrel fold is within a circle. D, the topology of the α/β hydrolase fold in the Obc1 C-domain is shown. Color codes are the same as those in B, and the catalytic triad is indicated. This figure was prepared using TopDraw (37). Given that the Obc1 N-domain is essentially identical to that of ObcA (10), its topology was not presented.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2.

Sequence alignment of Obc1 with its homologs. The amino acid sequence of Obc1 from B. thailandensis (WP_009896555.1) is compared with that of other homologs, including those from B. mallei (WP_004188532.1), B. pseudomallei (YP_111366.1), Burkholderia andropogonis (WP_046153766.1), B. glumae (WP_015877888.1), and B. cepacia (WP_048244856.1). Note that unlike the other homologs, B. glumae and B. cepacia (red diamonds) require two enzymes for oxalogenesis, but only ObcA, and not ObcB, shows sequence homology with the Obc1 N-domain. Highly conserved residues are shown in red and boxed in blue, whereas strictly conserved residues are shown with a red background. Secondary structural elements defined in the apo form of Obc1 are shown for the corresponding Obc1 sequences. Selected residues are indicated with different notations, including the metal-coordinating residues and catalytic residue of the N-domain (His-225, His-227, Tyr-326, and Glu-350; green triangle), catalytic triad (Ser-935, Asp-997, and His-1069; blue inverted triangle), and putative oxyanion hole-forming residues (Arg-856 and Arg-999; green circle). In particular, His-934, a proposed catalytic residue for lyase activity, is marked with a gray star. This figure was prepared using ESPript (38).

Many Burkholderia species are involved in plant or human pathogenesis. For example, B. glumae causes bacterial panicle blight in rice (12), whereas B. cepacia is an opportunistic pathogen in immunocompromised individuals, including those with cystic fibrosis and chronic granulomatous disease (13). B. pseudomallei causes melioidosis, a lethal infection that leads to the formation of abscesses in internal organs (14). Given that the Burkholderia species mentioned above possess two monofunctional enzymes, ObcA and ObcB, or a bi-functional Obc1 for oxalogenesis (Fig. 2), understanding the molecular basis of these enzymes should provide the groundwork for the development of novel agents for disease control.

We report the crystal structure of Obc1 in its apo form and glycerol-bound form. Using structural and functional analyses, we investigated how Obc1 catalyzes the production of three different products. Together with our previous study on ObcA (10), these results provide structural insights into bacterial oxalogenesis.

Results

Overall Structure of ApoObc1

The bifunctional enzyme Obc1 has two structurally and functionally distinct domains (Fig. 1B): an N-domain consisting of an ObcA-like N-terminal region (residues Val-2 to Ser-528) and a C-domain consisting of an ObcB activity-exhibiting C-terminal region (residues Arg-529 to Gln-1106). These two domains are arranged in an elongated manner (i.e. 110 Å long and 56 Å wide); therefore, there are no extensive interactions between the two domains. The active sites of the two domains are separated by 47 Å and oriented in an opposite direction.

Monomeric Obc1 was identified in an asymmetric unit, and no obvious oligomeric structure was identified by crystallographic symmetry, consistent with chromatographic analysis that Obc1 is monomeric. The N-domain of Obc1 exhibits 52% sequence identity with ObcA (Fig. 2), and therefore, its structure is essentially identical to that of ObcA (PDB codes 4NNA, 4NNB, and 4NNC) (10). Specifically, the (β/α)8-barrel fold of the Obc1 N-domain is superimposable with ObcA (Fig. 1C), within a root mean square deviation of 1.0 Å for 482 Cα atoms and a Z-score of 51.2 using the structure-similarity search program DALI (15). Structural analysis revealed the presence of a metal binding site and the relative locations of residues in the active site. Given that detailed structural and functional features of ObcA have been reported (10), we decided to focus on C-domain features.

C-domain of ApoObc1

The Obc1 C-domain (residues Arg-529 to Gln-1106) extends from the bottom of the N-domain (β/α)8-barrel fold and forms an independent domain that does not interact extensively with the N-domain. The core structural region adopts an α/β hydrolase fold in which the central β-sheet is packed with flanking α-helices on both sides (Fig. 1B). The C-domain has structural features common to canonical α/β hydrolases (16). From the topological view, the C-domain consists of two structural subdomains (Fig. 1B). The first region includes Ser-740 to Gln-1106 and forms an α/β hydrolase fold (Fig. 1D). The second subdomain (Arg-529 to Ala-739) is located over a concave region formed by an α/β hydrolase fold, resulting in a crevice between the two regions. Residues Arg-529 to Ala-739 (hereafter, we call this region the cap domain) predominantly form an α-helical fold, with two layers of anti-parallel helices. Specifically, just after the N-domain, two long adjacent α-helices, α19 and α20/21, are oriented in an anti-parallel fashion and form a surface layer of cap domain. Underneath this surface layer, other anti-parallel helices, α24 and α25, are located in a perpendicular orientation relative to the surface layer helices. In addition to these elements, helices α22, α23, and η3 form a four-helix bundle-like fold with the C-terminal region of α21. Due to a kink in the middle of the surface layer α-helices, the cap domain exhibits a convex surface and a concave interior. This cap domain is oriented such that a concave region sits on the edge of the β-sheet in the α/β hydrolase fold, resulting in the formation of a crevice on one side of the β-sheet that serves as the active site of the C-domain (see below).

Following the cap domain α25, a long loop connects a β-strand (i.e. β25) to form an α/β hydrolase fold including Ser-740 to Gln-1106 (Figs. 1D and 2). In the α/β hydrolase fold, nine β-strands (β26, β25, β28, β27, β29, β30, β31, β33, β32 in order) constitute a central β-sheet, in which β32 is the innermost strand near the N-domain and β26 is located farther from the N-domain and forms the surface of Obc1. In the middle of the central β-sheet, six strands (β28, β27, β29, β30, β31, and β33) are in a parallel orientation, with each C-terminal end pointing to the concave interior of the cap domain. At the ends, the other three β-strands are in an anti-parallel orientation (Fig. 1D). Helices α26, α29, α30, α31 are located on the backside of the β-sheet where the cap domain surface helices α19 and α20/21 are stretched out; this leaves this side of the central β-sheet inaccessible from the solvent. In particular, helix α28 on this side is located under the surface layer of the cap domain. The remaining helices are positioned at the other side of the central β-sheet in an arrangement that generates a crevice on the C-terminal end of the central β-sheet.

Active Site of Obc1 C-domain

The crevice on the Obc1 C-domain suggested the location for putative ObcB activity in the bifunctional enzyme Obc1. Moreover, a DALI-based structure similarity search indicated the presence of a catalytic triad (Ser-His-Asp) in the Obc1 crevice. Specifically, the search revealed that the most similar α/β hydrolase was pancreatic lipase-related protein 2 (PDB code 2PVS) (17); however, this protein only had a Z-score of 9.3 and 8% sequence identity. Due to low similarity in structure and sequence, these two α/β hydrolases exhibited limited structural conservation in the positions of the central β-strands, with large differences in the location of the flanking α-helices. Despite these differences, structural superposition of the Obc1 C-domain with pancreatic lipase-related protein 2 showed conservation of the catalytic triad (Ser-His-Asp) in both position and relative orientation. In Obc1, the putative catalytic triad consists of Ser-935, Asp-997, and His-1069 located in a loop region between β29 and α30, β31 and α32, and β33 and α36, respectively (Figs. 1D and 3A). Not surprisingly, these residues are clustered in a crevice in the C-domain, and their relative locations are conserved in other α/β hydrolases, consistent with members of this superfamily (18).

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3.

The active site of Obc1. A, the catalytic triad and a putative oxyanion-binding site are shown in the apo structure of Obc1, with the same color codes as in Fig. 1B. Possible hydrogen bonds are indicated with a dashed line. A loop of Ser-785–Thr-786–Pro-787 (green) and two arginine residues (Arg-856 and Arg-999) are presented. A water molecule (red sphere) near Ser-935 mediates possible hydrogen bonds to nearby residues. Note that the side chain of Thr-786 points outward, and its hydroxyl group interacts with the water molecule, and Ser-785 and Pro-787 are removed for clarity. B, zoomed-out view of the active site showing the stereoview of Obc1 in glycerol-bound form. Bound glycerol (green) is overlaid with a FoFc electron density map contoured at 3.0 σ. Other residues crucial for activity are also indicated. Note that His-934 forms a possible hydrogen bond with the hydroxyl group of glycerol. C, active site interactions in glycerol-bound Obc1. Putative hydrogen bonds (dashed lines) and corresponding interatomic distances (Å) are shown. One exception is the interatomic distance between glycerol (green) C2 and NE2 in His-934.

The Obc1 C-domain displays unique features in its active site, in addition to many structural features conserved in the α/β hydrolase family of proteins (16). First, a GXSXG sequence motif (X; any residue) containing a nucleophilic serine residue was not found; instead, an AHSSG (S at position 935) sequence motif was observed in the Obc1 C-domain. Second, an HGGG motif, a tetrapeptide conserved in many α/β hydrolases for an oxyanion hole, was not found. In general, the HGGG motif is located in a part of the loop region that is near a nucleophilic serine residue. In this motif, the main chain nitrogen atoms from glycine stabilize the binding of a tetrahedral reaction intermediate by forming a hydrogen bond with negatively charged oxygen atoms in the intermediate. In this study structural superposition indicated that a proposed oxyanion hole conserved in the α/β hydrolase fold corresponded to a loop region including Ser-785–Thr-786–Pro-787 that connects β27 and α27 in the immediate vicinity of Ser-935 (Fig. 3A). In other α/β hydrolases, the HGGG motif has been found to be oriented in such a manner that the side chain of histidine points to the inner side of the loop, and the main chain nitrogen atoms of glycine are exposed to nucleophilic serine. However, the side chain hydroxyl group of Thr-786 in the Obc1 C-domain protrudes from the corresponding loop and is located 2.5 Å from Ser-936, a residue next to nucleophilic Ser-935, and 2.5 Å from a water molecule that also forms a hydrogen bond with Ser-935, a putative catalytic nucleophile (Fig. 3A). Given this structural feature and the presence of proline at amino acid number 787, the main chain nitrogen atoms in the loop region are unavailable for hydrogen bonding, suggesting that this loop may not serve as an oxyanion hole in Obc1. Instead, positively charged Arg-856 and Arg-999 are in the vicinity of nucleophilic Ser-935. In particular, Arg-999 appears to be very dynamic based on its disordered electron density.

The Binding of Glycerol in the Obc1 C-domain

In our experimental conditions we were unable to detect the binding of a C6-CoA adduct in the Obc1 C-domain. Instead, we characterized glycerol bound to the Obc1 C-domain. The resulting electron density map suggested that the glycerol binding site is located at the proposed crevice surrounded by an α/β hydrolase fold and a cap domain (Fig. 3B). Specifically, glycerol was found at the entrance of the crevice, near the catalytic triad. In fact, glycerol is ∼3.4–4.0 Å from the side chains of His-1069 and Ser-935. Based on the current binding environment, it is chemically sensible in glycerol that the C2 carbon and hydroxyl group on pro-S C1 is located near the side chain nitrogen of His-934 and that the hydroxyl groups at pro-R C3 positions are located near the main chain carbonyl oxygen of His-1069 (Fig. 3C).

Functional Analysis of Obc1

There is no direct structural evidence for the existence of a true substrate binding site, and functional roles of residues near the proposed active site have been elusive. Therefore, we selected 19 residues in the C-domain for site-directed mutagenesis to explore their functional roles. These residues form the putative catalytic triad (Ser-935, Asp-997, and His-1069), possible oxyanion binding sites (Ser-785, Thr-786, Arg-856, Ser-936, and Arg-999), and the putative binding site for a C6-CoA adduct along the crevice and on the surface of the cap domain (Arg-601, Ser-609, Phe-610, Tyr-701, His-934, Asp-1061, Asp-1066, Asp-1067, Ser-1070, Arg-1072, and Arg-1073).

Two different assays were performed using various Obc1 mutants. Previously, we constructed Obc1* that has three mutations (H227A, Y326A, E350A) in the N-domain to eliminate any possible ObcA activity (10). All Obc1 mutants used for functional analysis in this study were engineered to have a mutation at a designated residue in the C-domain as well as three mutations in Obc1*. One assay was used to detect the formation of product CoA, and another assay was used to measure oxalate production. Preliminary experiments indicated that the maximal initial velocity of Obc1 could be achieved in the presence of ObcA, and under these conditions there were no differences in the measured velocity between wild-type Obc1 and Obc1* (Fig. 4A). Under our kinetic assay conditions, we also found that a C6-CoA adduct produced from ObcA was stable and could not be converted into CoA in the absence of Obc1 or Obc1* (Fig. 4A), validating that the formation of CoA from the adduct is enzyme-dependent (Fig. 1A).

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4.

Obc1 activity assay. A, reaction progress curve showing the production of CoA as a function of time. Reaction mixtures containing 500 μm acetyl-CoA and oxaloacetate were identical to those of the kinetic assays, as described under “Experimental Procedures.” Measurements were initiated by adding 100 nm wild-type Obc1 or Obc1*. However, in the five independent assays in the figure, only the enzyme(s) indicated was included in the assay. B, relative activity of Obc1* and its variants. For Obc1* activity, the initial velocity for CoA production was 72.2 μm/min (blue) as determined in panel A, and the total oxalate produced was 347.6 μm for 5-min reaction (red). These values were compared with the values obtained for each mutant. For both assays, measurements were performed in triplicate (n = 3), with 100 nm Obc1* or its mutants, and values are reported as means with S.E. Specifically, three independent enzyme purifications were performed. The activities of the mutants, such as S785A, R1066A, and R1072A, were identical to that of Obc1*; therefore, these residues were not included in this figure. C, a steady-state kinetic analysis of CoA production from Obc1* and three mutant enzymes. In this assay the concentration of the C6-CoA adduct was assumed to be equal to that of acetyl-CoA or oxaloacetate. The regression curve was prepared using SigmaPlot, and the kinetic parameters of the enzymes are indicated in Table 1. D, surface representation of the Obc1 C-domain. Color codes are as follows: N-domain (green), cap domain (cyan), α/β hydrolase domain (gray), and catalytic Ser-935 (red). The surface of residues is indicated in magenta if they significantly affected Obc1 activity. Residues relatively tolerant to mutation are indicated in white. Buried residues, such as Phe-610, Thr-786, Arg-856, Ser-936, and Asp-997, are not labeled.

Among the Obc1 mutants, the activities of three mutants (S785A, D1066A, R1072A) were essentially identical to that of Obc1*, but other mutants exhibited reduced activities (Fig. 4B). Putative catalytic triad mutants (S935A, D997N, D997A, or H1069A) had significantly impaired enzyme activities, indicating that Ser-935, Asp-997, and His-1069 do indeed form a catalytic triad. Specifically, the production of CoA in these four catalytic triad mutants was ∼1.8% that of Obc1* activity, and oxalate production was 5.9–8.3% relative to that of Obc1*. Putative oxyanion-binding site mutants provided interesting results. Compared with Obc1*, T786A and S936A mutants exhibited ∼8.5% and 21.0% CoA production, and 12.2% and 34.9% oxalate production, respectively. These results suggest that an interaction between Thr-786 and Ser-936 (Fig. 3A) may be important for maintaining the structural integrity of a Ser-785–Thr-786–Pro-787 loop near catalytic Ser-935. Interestingly, two arginine residues, Arg-856 and Arg-999, were crucial for activity, further supporting our proposal that these two residues could serve as an oxyanion binding site in Obc1 (Fig. 3A). Specifically, R856A and R999A mutants essentially lost their enzymatic features, but their activities were somewhat restored in R856K and R999K mutants (Fig. 4B). Subsequent steady-state kinetic analyses on R856K and R999K mutants indicated that Arg-856 and Arg-999 are likely critical catalytic residues given that these mutants had significant decreases in kcat but not Km (Fig. 4C and Table 1). Specifically, the Km values of the R856K and R999K mutants were 44.2 and 67.1 μm, close to the Km of Obc1*; however, their kcat values were 3.9% and 15.7% of Obc1*, respectively. Therefore, relative to Obc1*, their catalytic efficiency was 6.0% for R856K and 15.7% for R999K. These results show that a positive charge in these two residues is crucial for catalysis.

TABLE 1.

Kinetic parameters of Obc1* and its mutants

Numbers in parentheses refer to standard error (n = 3). Specifically, three independent purifications and measurements of Obc1* or mutant were performed.

Enzyme kcat Km kcat/Km
s1 μm s1 μm1
Obc1* 13.07 (0.17) 67.0 (8.5) 1.95 × 10−1
R856K 0.51 (0.03) 44.2 (3.8) 1.16 × 10−2
R999K 2.05 (0.14) 67.1 (9.7) 3.06 × 10−2
H934A 0.95 (0.10) 74.7 (9.2) 1.27 × 10−2

Mutations of residues along the crevice or on the surface of the cap domain suggest that residues along the crevice of the α/β hydrolase fold, but not the surface of the cap domain, play an important role in catalysis (Fig. 4, B and D). Specifically, mutation of Tyr-701, Asp-1061, Asp-1067, Ser-1070, or Arg-1073 resulted in significant loss of activity despite the fact that these residues are far away from the catalytic Ser-935 residue or the glycerol binding site. In particular, four residues (Asp-1061, Asp-1067, Ser-1070, and Arg-1073) are clustered in a loop and a helix between β42 and α36 (Figs. 1C and 4D), indicating that this protruding region can serve as a binding site for a CoA moiety. Cap domain residues including Arg-601, Ser-609, and Phe-610 were relatively tolerant to mutation, indicating that these regions do not participate in catalysis (Fig. 4, B and D). We further found that His-934, a residue adjacent to catalytic Ser-935, is crucial for activity (Fig. 3B). An H934A mutant exhibited 5.3% CoA production and 16.8% oxalogenesis relative to Obc1* (Fig. 4B). Further kinetic analysis of H934A indicated that kcat was largely affected by mutation, and its value was 7.3% that of Obc1*, but no significant change in Km was observed (Fig. 4C and Table 1), resulting in a catalytic efficiency of ∼6.5% of Obc1*. These functional data and the vicinity of His-934 to catalytic Ser-935 led us to propose that His-934 serves as a catalytic base/acid for cleavage of the C4-S bond in the C6-CoA adduct (Fig. 1A; see “Discussion”), resulting in the formation of acetoacetate and CoA. Consistent with this, His-934 in Obc1 is conserved in other homologs among Burkholderia species (Fig. 2).

Discussion

Structure determination of Obc1, as well as in vitro functional analyses, unraveled details about Obc1. Specifically, we found that the Obc1 C-domain exhibits ObcB-like function. It is unusual that functionally identical proteins have a completely different amino acid sequence and number of residues (i.e. ∼600 residues for the Obc1 C-domain versus 176 residues for ObcB). In addition, sequence analyses of ObcB using BetaWrap (19) and Phyre2 (20) suggested that ObcB has a β-helix structure, in which parallel β-strands are associated in a helical pattern. Therefore, the Obc1 C-domain and ObcB are dissimilar in all aspects of protein features including sequence, length, and structure. However, a lack of structural information on ObcB precludes further discussion about these unusual discrepancies.

Recent structural studies also revealed another example of a bifunctional enzyme. In Arabidopsis thaliana and the parasitic nematode Haemonchus contortus (21, 22), there is a phosphobase methylation pathway. In A. thaliana, a bifunctional enzyme with N- and C-terminal domains catalyzes the successive methylation of phosphoethanolamine to form phosphocholine. Interestingly, these reactions are catalyzed by two monofunctional enzymes in H. contortus, with each enzyme exhibiting identical catalytic activity to that of a corresponding domain of the A. thaliana bifunctional enzyme.

Based on the structural and biochemical data presented here, the following reaction mechanism for Obc1 is proposed (Fig. 5). With high identity both in sequence and structure to ObcA, the Obc1 N-domain should catalyze its first reaction by following the previously reported mechanism for ObcA (10). In the Obc1 N-domain, two different substrates, acetyl-CoA and oxaloacetate, are converted into a C6-CoA adduct (Fig. 1A). Tyr-326, a proposed key catalytic base, and other active site residues including metal-coordinating residues are conserved in the Obc1 N-domain (Fig. 2). Given that the C6-CoA adduct from the first reaction is not chemically labile and the liberation of CoA occurs in Obc1*-dependent catalysis (Fig. 4A), the second step should occur in the C-domain and involve the release of three products, namely, oxalate, acetoacetate, and CoA. This second enzyme reaction requires cleavage of two different bonds, the C2-C3 bond and the C4-S bond in the C6-CoA adduct (Fig. 1A). From a chemical structure perspective, C2-C3 bond cleavage accounts for oxalate production, and C4-S bond cleavage is responsible for the release of acetoacetate and CoA. It is highly evident that within the C-domain crevice, the catalytic triad is responsible for C2-C3 bond cleavage in a manner identical to other serine hydrolases that cleave C-C bonds between trigonal and tetrahedral carbon atoms (18, 23). Specifically, given that C2 in the C6-CoA adduct is the only sp2 carbon, Ser-935, upon activation by His-1069, performs nucleophilic attack on the C2 carbonyl carbon, forming a tetrahedral reaction intermediate (Fig. 5, steps I and II). The negative charge on the enolate oxygen atom of the tetrahedral intermediate could be stabilized by the presence of Arg-856 or Arg-999 (Fig. 4B and Table 1). Subsequent collapse of the tetrahedral intermediate by His-1069 as a proton donor cleaves the C2-C3 bond and leaves an acyl moiety covalently attached to Obc1 (Fig. 5, step III). The resulting acyl-Obc1 complex is subsequently hydrolyzed by a water molecule, leading to the release of one molecule of oxalic acid (Fig. 5, steps IV and V). The two other products, acetoacetate and CoA, should be liberated from the remaining CoA adduct (Fig. 5, steps II and III).

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5.

Proposed mechanism for C6-CoA adduct degradation in the active site of the Obc1 C-domain. It is noteworthy that the pro-S C1 and C2 atoms in glycerol could correspond to their positions to C4 and S atoms in the C6-CoA adduct (step I). In brief, catalytic Ser-935 performs a nucleophilic attack on the trigonal C2 atom to generate a tetrahedral intermediate (step II). The resulting oxyanionic intermediate can be stabilized by positively charged Arg-856 and Arg-999. We further propose that His-934 acts first as a base to deprotonate the hydroxyl group at C4 and subsequently acts as a catalytic acid to cleave the C4-S bond in the adduct, liberating acetoacetate and CoA (step III). The resulting acyl-Obc1 intermediate would be subject to hydrolysis by a water molecule, generating oxalate as a product (step IV and V). This final step is a well known reaction by a catalytic triad in the α/β hydrolase fold.

Our analyses suggest a catalytic role for His-934 in the cleavage reaction of the C4-S bond, leading to the production of acetoacetate and CoA. First, the presence of a hydrogen-bonding network supports that His-934 acts as a catalytic base during an initial stage of catalysis and later as a catalytic acid (Fig. 5, steps II and III). Specifically, the ND1 atom (nitrogen near Cα) in the His-934 side chain likely forms a hydrogen bond with the main chain carbonyl oxygen of Phe-974 (Fig. 3, B and C), allowing the NE2 atom (nitrogen far from Cα) to exist in a deprotonated state for a catalytic base. Furthermore, the binding mode of glycerol could provide a clue to that of a C6 moiety in the C6-CoA adduct (Fig. 5, step I). If we assume that the C6-CoA adduct, whose structure is based on a C4-CoA adduct previously identified (10), is bound to the active site of the Obc1 C-domain, then the C2 atom of the adduct should be placed toward the catalytic Ser-935 residue (Fig. 5, step I). This placement suggests that the pro-S C1 and C2 atoms in glycerol correspond to the C4 and S atoms in the C6-CoA adduct, respectively. Under these structural circumstances, His-934 is proximal to the hydroxyl group at C4 in the C6-CoA adduct. In fact, His-934 is within 3.6 Å from the hydroxyl group at the pro-S C1 and C2 carbons of glycerol (Fig. 3, B and C). Moreover, our kinetic analysis indicated a significant role for His-934 in catalysis, in particular kcat, not Km (Table 1). Taken together, His-934 could accept a proton from the C4 hydroxyl group of the C6-CoA adduct and then donate a proton back to the sulfur atom of an intermediate (Fig. 5, steps II and III), cleaving the C4-S bond and producing acetoacetate and CoA.

However, it is unknown whether cleavage of the C2-C3 and C4-S bonds in the C6-CoA adduct are performed in a sequential or concerted manner. In this study we did not detect any mutant enzymes that liberated only one product, suggesting that these two bonds are likely cleaved in a concerted manner (Fig. 4B). Further kinetic experiments are required to resolve this issue.

The crystal structure of Obc1 in its apo form and a glycerol-bound form provides the first structural insights into the second step of oxalogenesis. This study provides insight into an unusual enzymatic feature, the dual catalytic role of the Obc1 C-domain. Specifically, the C-domain has hydrolase activity mediated by a well known catalytic triad and lyase activity mediated by a single histidine residue. Given that the overall structural features of the Obc1 C-domain are similar to that of α/β hydrolase containing a catalytic triad, this suggests that the presence of additional lyase activity is an example of divergent evolution. Consistent with this, oxalogenesis in Burkholderia species is indispensable for their survival in the stationary phase.

Experimental Procedures

Cloning and Purification of Wild-type Obc1 and Its Mutants

The gene for Obc1 from B. thailandensis (7, 11) was amplified by colony PCR and cloned into a modified pET28b expression vector (Merck) containing a tobacco etch virus protease recognition sequence between the His5 tag and multiple cloning site. The resulting plasmid containing N-terminal His-tagged Obc1 was transformed into Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) cells (Novagen). After induction of protein expression with 0.5 mm isopropyl β-d-l-thiogalactopyranoside, E. coli cells were cultured for an additional 14–16 h at 20 °C. Cells were sonicated in Buffer A containing 50 mm HEPES (pH 7.0), 300 mm NaCl, and 5% (v/v) glycerol. N-terminal His-tagged Obc1 was purified using a HisTrap HP column (GE Healthcare) and eluted with Buffer A plus 250 mm imidazole. The His tag was subsequently cleaved by treatment with 2 mm dithiothreitol and tobacco etch virus protease overnight at 22 °C using a 20:1 molar ratio of Obc1 to tobacco etch virus protease. The resulting tag-free Obc1 protein was further purified using a HisTrap HP column and subjected to size-exclusion chromatography using Superdex-200 (GE Healthcare) with Buffer A. The protein concentration was quantified using an extinction coefficient of 129,150 m−1 cm−1 at 280 nm and calculated using the ProParam tool in ExPASy (24).

For the activity assay, Obc1* was constructed as described previously (10). Briefly, Obc1* exhibits ObcB activity but essentially lacks ObcA activity due to the introduction of three mutations (H227A, Y326A, E350A) into the active site of the N-terminal domain (Fig. 2). Genes for the various mutants used in the functional assay (Fig. 4B) were amplified by PCR using Obc1* as a template and mutagenic sequences as primers. N-terminal His-tagged Obc1*, Obc1* mutants, and wild-type ObcA (10) were purified using a HisTrap HP column and then desalted using a HiPrep 26/10 column (GE Healthcare).

Crystallization and Data Collection

Crystallization was conducted at 22 °C using the sitting drop vapor diffusion method. Initial crystals were produced in a buffer containing 0.1 m HEPES (pH 7.0), 1 m sodium citrate tribasic, and 10 mg/ml protein. Later, we found that co-crystallization of Obc1 with 5 mm oxaloacetate and 2 mm acetyl-CoA led to the production of larger crystals with higher diffracting quality. However, the added substrates were not bound to the active site. Under these conditions, we obtained a crystal for the apo form of Obc1.

We also report the structure of Obc1 in complex with glycerol in its active site. Crystallization conditions for this complex were the same as those used for the apo form, except that a pre-grown crystal was soaked in the crystallization mother liquor plus 5 mm acetyl-CoA and 10 mm oxaloacetate. During protein purification, glycerol was a component of Buffer A; however, for unknown reasons, it was only bound to Obc1 when the crystal was soaked in the mother liquor-containing substrates.

X-ray diffraction data were collected at 100 K with a 0.5° oscillation angle on beamline 7A at the Pohang Accelerator Laboratory (Korea). Ethylene glycol (20% v/v) was used as the cryo-protectant during data collection, and the collected image files were processed using iMOSFLM (25). The space group of Obc1 crystals is R32, with one monomer in the asymmetric unit (Table 2). In particular, a high resolution cut-off of each data set was based on a CC1/2 statistical value of ∼0.5. The CC1/2 statistical value is superior to the Rmerge or signal-to-noise ratio as a statistical guide for deciding the usefulness of data (2628). In this study the CC1/2 value-based resolution cut-off indeed provided a higher-quality electron density map, compared with the map calculated using data based on the Rmerge value or signal-to-noise ratio.

TABLE 2.

Data and refinement statistics

r.m.s., root mean square.

Data set Apo Glycerol-bound
    PDB ID 5IKY 5IKZ
    Wavelength (Å) 0.9793 0.9793
    Resolution range (Å) 38.8-2.5 (2.6-2.5)a 46.35-2.8 (2.9-2.8)
    Unique reflections 88,989 (8845) 63,294 (6257)
    Multiplicity 2.0 (2.0) 2.0 (2.0)
    Completeness (%) 99.7 (100.0) 100.0 (100.0)
    Mean I/σ(I) 10.4 (1.4) 12.7 (1.6)
    Wilson B-factor (Å2) 57.1 57.0
    R-merge 0.040 (0.496) 0.056 (0.492)
    CC1/2b 0.998 (0.530) 0.997 (0.461)
    CC*c 0.999 (0.832) 0.999 (0.794)

Space group R32:H R32:H
    Unit cell a = b and c (Å) 230.8, 253.7 230.0, 253.8
    α = β, γ (°) 90, 120 90, 120

Refinement
    R-workd 0.198 (0.306) 0.199 (0.300)
    R-freee 0.227 (0.331) 0.227 (0.332)
    No. of atoms
        Protein 7835 7848
        Ligand 1 7
        Waters 200 207
    Protein residues 1048 1047
    r.m.s. (bonds) (Å) 0.003 0.003
    r.m.s. (angles) (°) 0.72 0.69
    Ramachandran favored (%) 96 96
    Ramachandran outliers (%) 0.6 0.4
    Average B-factor (Å2) 77.9 69.5
        Protein 78.2 69.9
        Ligand 54.4 79.7
        Waters 67.7 54.8

a Numbers in parentheses refer to data in the highest resolution shell.

b The CC1/2 is the Pearson correlation coefficient (CC) calculated from each subset containing a random half of the measurements of unique reflection.

c CC* = [2CC1/2/(1 + CC1/2)](1/2), a statistical guide for deciding useful data, as defined by Karplus and Diederichs (28).

d Rwork = Σ FobsFcal / Σ Fobs.

e Rfree is the same as Robs for a selected subset (2.25% in apo form, 5% in glycerol-bound form) of the reflections that was not included in prior refinement calculations.

Structure Determination and Refinement

The structure of apoObc1 was determined using the molecular replacement program MrBUMP (29, 30) with an apoObcA structure (10) (Protein Data Bank code 4NNA) using the N-terminal region of Obc1 as a search model. Unlike the N-terminal region, the quality of the electron density map for the remaining C-terminal region was relatively poor. The initial model was manually built and refined using the programs COOT (31), Buccaneer (30, 32), and PHENIX (33). Several cycles of model building and refinement improved the quality of the map, in particular for the C-terminal region. In the final model, 1048 residues were located, except for some highly disordered residues (Table 2). As seen in the structure of ObcA (10), an electron density map for a metal ion was found in the active site of the apoObc1 N-terminal domain even though no metal ion was added during purification or crystallization. Subsequently, the refined structure of apoObc1 was used as a starting model for refining Obc1 in complex with glycerol. In particular, an electron density map corresponding to glycerol was identified in the putative active site of the Obc1 C-domain. Further refinement was carried out using PHENIX.

Steady-state Kinetic Assay

Obc1 enzymatic activity was measured in a manner similar to that for ObcA (10). In brief, two different assays were employed, each measuring the production of different products. First, a steady-state kinetic assay was performed in the presence of 2,6-dichlorophenolindophenol, which is reduced by the free sulfhydryl group of CoA, causing a linear decrease in absorbance at 600 nm (3436). Second, total oxalate production was measured using an oxalate assay kit (Trinity Biotech) following the manufacturer's protocol. In both assays, the reaction mixture contained Co2+ ion as the most effective ion for ObcA activity (10).

Using 2,6-dichlorophenolindophenol, a steady-state kinetic assay was performed at 30 °C in a reaction mixture containing 50 mm HEPES (pH 8.0), 100 mm NaCl, 120 μm 2,6-dichlorophenolindophenol, 100 μm CoCl2, and 7.8–500 μm acetyl-CoA and oxaloacetate. Then 250 nm ObcA was added to the reaction mixture and preincubated for 10 min at 30 °C to produce C6-CoA adducts that served as substrates for the Obc1 C-terminal domain. After preincubation, 100–2000 nm Obc1* or its mutant was added to the reaction mixture for adduct cleavage to free CoA, acetoacetate, and oxalate. A decrease in absorbance at 600 nm was measured using a UV-visible spectrophotometer (Jasco), and the initial velocity was determined from 70 to 130 s. The initial velocity was used to determine the CoA production per minute based on a standard reaction curve (10). Km and Vmax values were obtained by fitting initial velocity versus substrate concentration data to the Michaelis-Menten equation using SigmaPlot. In this analysis we assumed that the concentration of the C6-CoA adduct produced was equal to the concentration of the substrates acetyl-CoA and oxaloacetate. Unlike the kinetic assays, to determine the relative activity of the Obc1* mutants, the assays were performed using 500 μm substrate and 100 nm Obc1* or its mutants, and the initial velocity was determined.

Total oxalate production was measured at 30 °C using the reaction mixture for kinetic analysis in the presence of 500 μm acetyl-CoA and 500 μm oxaloacetate but without 2,6-dichlorophenolindophenol. In brief, 500 nm ObcA was added to the reaction mixture and incubated for 5 min. Cleavage of the C6-CoA adduct was initiated and incubated for another 5 min after the addition of 100 nm Obc1*. The resulting reaction mixture was mixed with an oxalate assay reagent, and the absorbance at 590 nm was measured after 5 min. The concentration of oxalate was calculated from a standard curve obtained using oxalic acid.

Author Contributions

J. O., I. H. and S. R. designed the research. J. O. performed the research. J. O., I. H. and S. R. analyzed the data and wrote the paper.

*

This work was supported by Next-Generation BioGreen 21 Program of Rural Development Administration (Plant Molecular Breeding Center no. PJ01101901; to S. R.) of Republic of Korea. The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article.

The atomic coordinates and structure factors (codes 5IKY and 5IKZ) have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank (http://wwpdb.org/).

2
The abbreviations used are:
Obc
oxalate biosynthetic component
CC
Pearson correlation coefficient.

References

  • 1. Goo E., An J. H., Kang Y., and Hwang I. (2015) Control of bacterial metabolism by quorum sensing. Trends Microbiol. 23, 567–576 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Dandekar A. A., Chugani S., and Greenberg E. P. (2012) Bacterial quorum sensing and metabolic incentives to cooperate. Science 338, 264–266 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Pai A., Tanouchi Y., and You L. (2012) Optimality and robustness in quorum sensing (QS)-mediated regulation of a costly public good enzyme. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, 19810–19815 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Heilmann S., Krishna S., and Kerr B. (2015) Why do bacteria regulate public goods by quorum sensing? How the shapes of cost and benefit functions determine the form of optimal regulation. Front. Microbiol. 6, 767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Schuster M., Sexton D. J., Diggle S. P., and Greenberg E. P. (2013) Acyl-homoserine lactone quorum sensing: from evolution to application. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 67, 43–63 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Miller M. B., and Bassler B. L. (2001) Quorum sensing in bacteria. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 55, 165–199 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Goo E., Majerczyk C. D., An J. H., Chandler J. R., Seo Y. S., Ham H., Lim J. Y., Kim H., Lee B., Jang M. S., Greenberg E. P., and Hwang I. (2012) Bacterial quorum sensing, cooperativity, and anticipation of stationary-phase stress. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, 19775–19780 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Li H. Q., Matsuda I., Fujise Y., and Ichiyama A. (1999) Short-chain acyl-CoA-dependent production of oxalate from oxaloacetate by Burkholderia glumae, a plant pathogen which causes grain rot and seedling rot of rice via the oxalate production. J. Biochem. 126, 243–253 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Nakata P. A., and He C. (2010) Oxalic acid biosynthesis is encoded by an operon in Burkholderia glumae. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 304, 177–182 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Oh J., Goo E., Hwang I., and Rhee S. (2014) Structural basis for bacterial quorum sensing-mediated oxalogenesis. J. Biol. Chem. 289, 11465–11475 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Nakata P. A. (2011) The oxalic acid biosynthetic activity of Burkholderia mallei is encoded by a single locus. Microbiol. Res. 166, 531–538 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Ham J. H., Melanson R. A., and Rush M. C. (2011) Burkholderia glumae: next major pathogen of rice? Mol. Plant Pathol. 12, 329–339 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Leitão J. H., Sousa S. A., Ferreira A. S., Ramos C. G., Silva I. N., and Moreira L. M. (2010) Pathogenicity, virulence factors, and strategies to fight against Burkholderia cepacia complex pathogens and related species. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 87, 31–40 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Galyov E. E., Brett P. J., and DeShazer D. (2010) Molecular insights into Burkholderia pseudomallei and Burkholderia mallei pathogenesis. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 64, 495–517 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Holm L., and Rosenström P. (2010) Dali server: conservation mapping in 3D. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, W545–W549 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Kourist R., Jochens H., Bartsch S., Kuipers R., Padhi S. K., Gall M., Böttcher D., Joosten H. J., and Bornscheuer U. T. (2010) The α/β-hydrolase fold 3DM database (ABHDB) as a tool for protein engineering. Chembiochem 11, 1635–1643 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Eydoux C., Spinelli S., Davis T. L., Walker J. R., Seitova A., Dhe-Paganon S., De Caro A., Cambillau C., and Carrière F. (2008) Structure of human pancreatic lipase-related protein 2 with the lid in an open conformation. Biochemistry 47, 9553–9564 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Nardini M., and Dijkstra B. W. (1999) α/β hydrolase fold enzymes: the family keeps growing. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 9, 732–737 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Bradley P., Cowen L., Menke M., King J., and Berger B. (2001) BETAWRAP: successful prediction of parallel β-helices from primary sequence reveals an association with many microbial pathogens. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98, 14819–14824 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Kelley L. A., Mezulis S., Yates C. M., Wass M. N., and Sternberg M. J. (2015) The Phyre2 web portal for protein modeling, prediction and analysis. Nat. Protoc. 10, 845–858 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Lee S. G., and Jez J. M. (2013) Evolution of structure and mechanistic divergence in di-domain methyltransferases from nematode phosphocholine biosynthesis. Structure 21, 1778–1787 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Lee S. G., and Jez J. M. (2014) Nematode phospholipid metabolism: an example of closing the genome-structure-function circle. Trends Parasitol. 30, 241–250 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Buller A. R., and Townsend C. A. (2013) Intrinsic evolutionary constraints on protease structure, enzyme acylation, and the identity of the catalytic triad. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, E653–E661 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Gasteiger E., Gattiker A., Hoogland C., Ivanyi I., Appel R. D., and Bairoch A. (2003) ExPASy: The proteomics server for in-depth protein knowledge and analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 3784–3788 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Battye T. G., Kontogiannis L., Johnson O., Powell H. R., and Leslie A. G. (2011) iMOSFLM: a new graphical interface for diffraction-image processing with MOSFLM. Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 67, 271–281 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Evans P. R. (2011) An introduction to data reduction: space-group determination, scaling and intensity statistics. Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 67, 282–292 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Diederichs K., and Karplus P. A. (2013) Better models by discarding data? Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 69, 1215–1222 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Karplus P. A., and Diederichs K. (2012) Linking crystallographic model and data quality. Science 336, 1030–1033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Keegan R. M., and Winn M. D. (2007) Automated search-model discovery and preparation for structure solution by molecular replacement. Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 63, 447–457 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Winn M. D., Ballard C. C., Cowtan K. D., Dodson E. J., Emsley P., Evans P. R., Keegan R. M., Krissinel E. B., Leslie A. G., McCoy A., McNicholas S. J., Murshudov G. N., Pannu N. S., Potterton E. A., Powell H. R., Read R. J., Vagin A., and Wilson K. S. (2011) Overview of the CCP4 suite and current developments. Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 67, 235–242 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Emsley P., Lohkamp B., Scott W. G., and Cowtan K. (2010) Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 486–501 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Cowtan K. (2006) The Buccaneer software for automated model building. 1. Tracing protein chains. Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 62, 1002–1011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Adams P. D., Afonine P. V., Bunkóczi G., Chen V. B., Davis I. W., Echols N., Headd J. J., Hung L. W., Kapral G. J., Grosse-Kunstleve R. W., McCoy A. J., Moriarty N. W., Oeffner R., Read R. J., Richardson D. C., Richardson J. S., Terwilliger T. C., and Zwart P. H. (2010) PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 213–221 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Raychaudhuri A., Jerga A., and Tipton P. A. (2005) Chemical mechanism and substrate specificity of RhlI, an acylhomoserine lactone synthase from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Biochemistry 44, 2974–2981 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Nakamura H., Mogi Y., Hattori H., Kita Y., Hattori D., Yoshimura A., and Karube I. (2008) Absorption-based highly sensitive and reproducible biochemical oxygen demand measurement method for seawater using salt-tolerant yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae ARIF KD-003. Anal. Chim. Acta 620, 127–133 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Jones A. J., and Hirst J. (2013) A spectrophotometric coupled enzyme assay to measure the activity of succinate dehydrogenase. Anal. Biochem. 442, 19–23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Bond C. S. (2003) TopDraw: a sketchpad for protein structure topology cartoons. Bioinformatics 19, 311–312 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Robert X., and Gouet P. (2014) Deciphering key features in protein structures with the new ENDscript server. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, W320–W324 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Biological Chemistry are provided here courtesy of American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

RESOURCES