Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2016 May 4;116(6):544–553. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2016.03.030

Immune-mediated Reactions to Vancomycin: A Systematic Case Review and Analysis

Jasmit Minhas 1, Paige G Wickner 2,3, Aidan A Long 3,4, Aleena Banerji 3,4, Kimberly G Blumenthal 3,4,5,6
PMCID: PMC4946960  NIHMSID: NIHMS797774  PMID: 27156746

INTRODUCTION

Vancomycin, a tricyclic glycopeptide,1 is one of the oldest and most effective antibiotics used to treat gram positive aerobic species. Vancomycin is the optimal parenteral treatment for many infections, including septicemia, pneumonia, cellulitis, endocarditis, and meningitis caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Orally, vancomycin is first-line treatment for the growing healthcare associated infection, Clostridium difficile pseudomembranous colitis.2 Vancomycin is also commonly used for treating infections in hospitalized patients and surgical patients with prior hypersensitivity to penicillins and/or cephalosporins.3

Clinicians are largely familiar with the adverse drug reactions (ADRs) that occur with vancomycin use, including nephrotoxicity, ototoxicity, and hematologic toxicity.4 These ADRs are most pronounced among patients receiving extended courses of parenteral vancomycin therapy as outpatients, where the observed frequency of ADRs approaches 10% .5 Vancomycin is also known for causing red man syndrome an immediate reaction that is IgE-independent, or pseudoallergic, in nature. Red man syndrome can affect between 4 and 47% of patients treated with vancomycin,6 and symptoms range from erythema to cardiovascular compromise/shock.

Vancomycin also has the potential to cause immune-mediated reactions, or hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs), which may be less frequently recognized. Vancomycin HSRs include immediate, type I HSR (immunoglobulin [Ig]E)-mediated); organ specific reactions such as acute interstitial nephritis (AIN), typically a Type II HSR (antibody dependent); and other non-immediate HSRs, commonly type IV HSRs (cell-mediated, delayed-type). These HSRs include maculopapular rash, drug rash eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome, linear IgA bullous dermatosis (LABD), and Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN).

While syntheses of vancomycin ADRs have been reported,4 to our knowledge, no formal review of immune-mediated HSRs to vancomycin is available. Therefore, we aimed to identify the most commonly reported vancomycin HSRs through systematic case review.

METHODS

We performed a systematic case report and case series review, with a protocol that adhered closely to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses statement.7 The literature search was performed during January, 2015 and included Ovid MEDLINE (1982-present), PubMed (1982- present), the Cochrane Library (1982-present). The base of the search used the medical subject heading vancomycin with a subheading limiter of “adverse effects.” Additionally, text word searches for vancomycin were matched against a list of HSR key words: hypersensitivity, allergic, urticaria, hives, rash, drug induced hypersensitivity syndrome, DIHS drug rash eosinophilia and systemic symptoms, eosinophilia, , bullous, dermatosis, IgA, IgE, anaphylaxis, nephritis, acute interstitial nephritis, and AIN.8 We identified additional articles by reviewing references of included manuscripts. The last date searched was July 31, 2015.

Inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria were specified in advance. We included case reports and case series of vancomycin HSRs in English, or original work that was translated into English, from 1982 until present. In order to synthesize clinical data, only publications with available full texts were included. Each case was identified and screened by one physician (JM). Inclusion of only convincing HSR reports was determined by a board-certified allergist/immunologist (KGB), with final case inclusion approved by all board-certified allergist co-investigators (KGB, PGW, AAL, AB). Final inclusion necessitated a clear presentation of a patient with signs and symptoms of the HSR with appropriate causal logic in attribution of HSR to vancomycin. We excluded cases of ADRs that were possibly toxicities (e.g., cytopenias) and cases reporting immediate symptoms that were more likely red man syndrome than IgE. To distinguish from red man syndrome, and to be included in possible IgE-mediated HSR, cases of immediate reactions needed to have at least one of the following: (1) positive skin testing using a non-irritating concentration,9,10 (2) immediate symptoms consistent with anaphylaxis11 despite a red man syndrome protocol (slowed infusion and antihistamine premedication),12,13,14 or (3) symptoms consistent with IgE-mediated reaction during a vancomycin desensitization15,16,17.

Clinical data were collected from each case, and included patient characteristics, infection being treated, and reaction details including timing of HSR onset, available subjective and objective clinical data confirming the HSR, and subsequent treatment and course. For each HSR, we performed summary descriptive statistics, including frequenciesand medians with interquartile ranges.

RESULTS

The search identified 201 possible publications, of which 84 were relevant to our topic and screened (Figure 1). Of these, 82 full-text articles were available of which 57 demonstrated vancomycin HSRs and met inclusion quality standards for qualitative and quantitative analysis. The 57 articles included 71 cases of patients with a vancomycin HSR (Supplemental Table 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Flow chart of methodology for studies chosen for the review

Legend. Of 201 identified publications; 84 were screened and 58 met inclusion criteria. The 58 articles included 71 HSR cases.

Overall, patients had a median age 60 years [IQR 46 years, 71 years] and 40 (56%) male sex. HSRs were immediate (IgE/anaphylaxis, n=7) and non-immediate (n=64). Non-immediate HSRs identified were LABD ( n=34), DRESS syndrome (n=16), AIN (n=8), and SJS/TEN (n=6, Figure 2). HSR timing varied by HSR, with median latency of 7 days [IQR 4 days, 10 days] for LABD, 9 days [IQR 9 days, 22 days] for SJS/TEN, 21 days [IQR 17 days, 28 days] for DRESS syndrome and 26 days [IQR 7 days, 29 days] for AIN (Figure 3a). Overall, 11 (16%) of patients died, with 4 (6%) dying from HSR complications (Figure 3b).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Cases of Immune-Mediated Hypersensitivity Reactions to Vancomycin

Legend. HSRs were immediate (n=7) and non-immediate (n=64). Non-immediate hypersensitivity reactions included LABD ( n=34), DRESS syndrome (n=16), acute interstitial nephritis (n=8), and SJS/ TEN (n=6).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Figure 3

Immune-mediated Hypersensitivity Reactions to Vancomycin. (a) Timing of Hypersensitivity Reactions (b) Observed fatalities by Hypersensitivity Reaction

Legend: (A) Median time to onset of hypersensitivity reactions varied by type. (B) Overall 11 (16%) of patients with vancomycin HSRs died, with 4(6%) of deaths attributed to HSR.

We identified seven cases of presumed IgE-mediated HSR to vancomycin (Table 1). Patients had median age of 43 years [IQR 39 years, 46 years] and females represented a majority (57%). Each patient exhibited immediate symptoms meeting definition of anaphylaxis. While skin findings were commonly present (n=5, 71%), 5 patients (71%) had respiratory symptoms and 4 patients (57%) had hypotension. In five patients, there was documentation of prior exposure to vancomycin. Patients had onset of reaction a median of two minutes [IQR 1 minute, 5 minutes] into the dose. Treatment included steroids and antihistamines, with epinephrine used in 4 patients (5 7%). Two of the reported cases required intubation, with one fatality, attributed to bilateral pneumonia and overwhelming sepsis.18,19 After experiencing a HSR, 4 (57%) of patients underwent skin testing or a re-challenge. One patient had a positive skin test, that was defined by a wheal diameter of 3mm larger than the negative control to vancomycin (wheal 10 mm / flare 35 mm) using 50 mg/ml of vancomycin solution.10 One patient had symptoms despite a red man syndrome protocol20.21 Two patients were desensitized to vancomycin with breakthrough symptoms. 19,22

Table 1.

Clincal data for cases of IgE-mediated reactions to vancomycin (n=7)

Age
(yrs)
Gender
(M/F)
Number of
vancomycin
doses
previously
Infection
treated
Reaction
timing*
(minutes)
Symptoms Treatment Outcome Skin-
testing or
re-
challenge
Justification
for IgE
Otani
et al.
2015
60 F NA Enterococcus
faecalis
8m Dyspnea
Hypotension
Skin erythema
Flushing
Steroids
Antihistamines
Epinephrine
Improved Yes Skin testing
positive
Bosse
et al.
2013
35 M 1 Clostridium
difficile
colitis
35m Dyspnea
Throat tightness,
laryngeal
edema, Facial
erythema
Steroids
IVF
Antihistamines
Epinephrine
Switched therapy
Improved No Convincing
clinical
diagnosis
Kupsta
ie et al.
2010
23 M 1 Polymicrobia
l bactermia
including
Enterococcus
faecalis and
MRSA
1m Dyspnea
Hypotension
(80/60)
Tachycardia
Facial flushing,
cold sweat,
tremor
Steroids
IVF
Antihistamines
Switched therapy
Improved,
negative
repeat
culture
No Convincing
clinical
diagnosis
Kitaza
wa et
al.
2005
43 M 1 MRSA
abscess
1m Wheezing
Flushing
Antihistamines Improved Yes Breakthrough
symptoms
despite
premedication
and
desensitization
Hassab
alla et
al.
2000
45 F NA Enterococcus
wound
infection
1m Cardiac arrest
Hypotension
Flushing
Tongue swelling
Emesis,
Diaphoresis
Intubated
Epinephrine
Steroids
Antihistamines
Desensitized to
vancomycin
Improved No Convincing
clinical
diagnosis
Chopra
et al.
2000
46 F 1 MRSA
dialysis
catheter
infection
2m Respiratory
distress,
Wheezing,
Cyanosis,
Pruritus,
Erythema,
Steroids
Antihistamines
Deceased,
from
sepsis
Yes Severe
reaction
despite red
man syndrome
prophylactic
administration
Vilavic
encio
et al.
1998
43 F 1 MRSA wound
infection
2m Hypotension,
Facial swelling,
Lip Swelling
CPR
Intubation
Epinephrine
Improved Yes Severe
reaction with
breakthrough
symptoms
despite
premedication
and
desensitization
*

Timing from vancomycin dose to reaction onset

Abbreviations: NA: not available; IVF: intravenous fluids; MRSA: methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; CPR: cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Thirty-four cases of LABD from vancomycin wereidentified(Table 2). Patients median age was 70 years [IQR 61 years, 76 years)] and men represented over half (56%) of cases. Patients reported with LABD developed the rash a median of 7 days [IQR 4 days, 10 days] into vancomycin course. Thirty-two patients (94%) had bullous eruptions. Two patients (6%) had macules and papules only. The rash among cases of LABD included skin sloughing (n=5, 15%), mucosal involvement (n=7, 21%), urticaria (n=2, 6%), vesicles (n=6, 18%), target lesions (n=3, 9%), and involvement of palms and soles (n=5, 15%) All patients had biopsies with characteristic subepidermal bulla with neutrophilic abscesses in the papillary dermis with direct immunofluorescence confirming a linear pattern of IgA deposition along the basement membrane zone. Treatment included topical and/or oral steroids. Three patients (9%) were treated with dapsoneThirty patients (88%) improved. The median time to resolution among 17 cases was 14 days [IQR 14 days, 21 days]. Sixpatients 18%) died, with 3 deaths directly related to LABD.

Table 2.

Clinical data for cases of Linear IgA bullous dermatosis to vancomycin (LABD, n=34). All patients had characteristic skin biopsy findings and direct immunoflourescence with linear IgA deposition along the basement membrane/dermal-epidermal junction.

Age
(yrs)
Sex
(M/
F)
Infection
treated
Reactio
n
timing
Skin
Sloughing
Mucosal
Involvement
Other rash
atypical
feature
Treatment Outcome
Kakar et
al. 2013
91 F Acute
cholecystitis
Sepsis
2d 40% BSA Oral Vesicles Comfort
measures only
Deceased, from
HSR
Selvaraj
et al.
2013
70 F Post-
operative
sepsis
5d Oral Vesicles
Palms
affected
Discontinuation
of vancomycin
Full resolution
within 14d
Jawitz et
al. 2011
78 F HAP post-op 28d Topical steroids Full resolution in
10d
O’Brien
et al.
2011
45 M Clostridium
dificile
colitis
2d Discontinuation
of vancomycin
Camphorylated
moisturizer
Full resolution
McDonal
d et al.
2010
32 M VAP 10d Discontinuation
of vancomycin
Full resolution
Walshe et
al. 2009
76 M Staphylococ
cus
bacteremia
9d Oral steroids
Discontinuation
of vancomycin
Full resolution
Khan et
al. 2008
57 M Liver and
splenic
abscesses
Laparotomy
35d 75% BSA Palms and
Soles
affected
Topical steroids
HD
IVIG
Deceased, from
HSR
Senanaya
ke et al.
2008
68 M Post-op
wound
infection
4d Oral Palms
affected
Oral steroids
Discontinuation
of vancomycin
Full resolution
Billet et
al. 2008
70 M Post-op
perihepatic
abscess,
MRSA,
Enterococcu
s
5d No bullae Oral steroids
Dapsone
Clinically
improved within
3d
Billet et
al. 2008
61 F Post-op
wound
abdominal
infection
13d No bullae Topical steroids
Discontinuation
of vancomycin
Clinically
improved in 6d
Navi et al.
2006
73 M ICD
placement
3d Vesicles Discontinuation
of vancomycin
Full resolution in
2 weeks
Waldman
et al.
2004
77 M CABG,
complicated
post-op
course
6d 46% BSA Silvadene
dressing
changes q12h
Dapsone
Complete re-
epithelialization
within 3 weeks
Deceased, from
cardiac
complications
Joshi et
al. 2004
48 F TVH c/b
pelvic
abscess
10d Discontinuation
of vancomycin
Full resolution
Armstron
g et al.
2004
81 M AAA repair
c/b wound
infection
3d Target
lesions
Discontinuation
of vancomycin
Full resolution in
3 weeks
Dellavalle
et al.
2003
74 M Pneumonia 4d 90% BSA Oral Discontinuation
of vancomycin
Deceased, from
septic shock
Neughbau
er et al.
2002
52 F Escherichia
coli
urosepsis
<1d Vesicles Discontinuation
of vancomycin
Full resolution in
2 weeks
Palmer et
al. 2001
75 F Infected
varicose
ulcer
6d Urticaria Oral steroids
Dapsone
Full resolution
Palmer et
al. 2001
86 F Fracture of
femur s/p
repair
4d “Diffuse” Oral steroids Deceased, from
pneumonia and
complications of
HSR
Palmer et
al. 2001
78 F CABG c/b
MRSA
wound
infection
15d Urticaria Topical steroids
Discontinuation
of vancomycin
Resolution of
rash
Deceased, from
renal failure
Klein et
al. 2000
65 M Sepsis due
to Klebsiella
pneumoniae,
P.aeruginos
a,
Staphylococ
cus species
14d Discontinuation
of vancomycin
Full resolution in
4 weeks
Mofid et
al. 2000
87 F Urinary tract
infection
11d Oral IV steroids
Discontinuation
of vancomycin
Full resolution
Danielsen
et al.
1999
68 M Culture
negative
endocarditis
9d Vesicles Topical steroids
Discontinuation
of vancomycin
Full resolution
within 10d
Bernstein
et al.
1998
60 F Enterocutan
eous fistula
10d Oral steroids
Discontinuation
of vancomycin
Full resolution
Nousari et
al. 1998
65 F P.aeruginos
a
S.epidermidi
s sepsis
7d Discontinuation
of vancomycin
Full resolution
within 30 days
Whitwort
h et al.
1996
63 M Cardiac
catherization
1d Oral steroids
Discontinuation
of vancomycin
Full resolution
within 3 weeks
Richard et
al. 1995
72 F Total pelvic
ex-
enteration
for TCC of
the bladder
2d Oral and
genital
Target
lesions
Papules
Discontinuation
of vancomycin
Full resolution of
eruptions over 2
weeks
Geismann
et al.
1995
79 M S. aureus
cellulitis
8d Oral and
genital
Discontinuation
of vancomycin
Full resolution
Kuechle
et al.
1994
69 M Draining
sinus tract
status-post
CABG
14d Discontinuation
of vancomycin
Full resolution
within 3 weeks
Kuechle
et al.
1994
74 F Sternal
wound
infection
status-post
CABG
5d Target
lesions
Palms
affected
Discontinuation
of vancomycin
Full resolution
Kuechle
et al.
1994
67 M Sternal
wound
infection
status-post
CABG
1d Vesicles Discontinuation
of vancomycin
Full resolution
Carpenter
et al.
1992
54 M Bowel
perforation
10d Discontinuation
of vancomycin
Full resolution
within 9 months
Carpenter
et al.
1992
72 F Intra-
abdominal
abscess
7d Palms and
soles
affected
Discontinuation
of vancomycin
Full resolution
within 2 weeks
Carpenter
et al.
54 M Osteomyeliti
s
21d Vancomycin
continued for
an additional 3
weeks without
worsening
Full resolution
Baden et
al. 1988
68 M E.coli
urosepsis
Post-op
(CABG)
9d Discontinuation
of vancomycin
Twice daily
compresses
Bacitracin
Resolution
within 2 weeks

* Timing from vancomycin dose to reaction onset

Abbreviations: d: days; BSA: body surface area; HSR: hypersensitivity reaction; HAP: hospital acquired pneumonia; VAP: ventilator associated pneumonia; HD: hemodialysis; IVIG: intravenous immunoglobulins; MRSA: methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; ICD; implantable cardioverter defibrillator; CABG: coronary artery bypass graft; h: hours; TVH: total vaginal hysterectomy; c/b: complicated by; AAA: abdominal aortic aneurysm; s/p: status-post; IV: intravenous; TCC: transitional cell carcinoma

We identified 16 cases of DRESS syndrome from vancomycin (Table 3). Median age was 52 years [IQR 47 years, 61 years] and men represented a majority (56%). HSR occurred a median of 21 days [IQR 17 days, 28 days] into the patient’s treatment course. Symptoms included edema (63%), lymphadenopathy (19%), and fever (81%). Cases with liver involvement (n=13, 81%), reported median peak alanine aminotransferase of 163 mg/dL [113 mg/dL, 337 mg/dL) and aspartate aminotransferase of 157 mg/mL [IQR 91 mg/mL, 313 mg/mL]. Of nine (56%) cases with renal involvement, eight reported peak Creatinine, with a median of 2.2 mg/dL [IQR 0.7 mg/dL, 4.2 mg/dL). The median absolute eosinophil count (AEC) among 16 cases was 3,180/mL [IQR 1,883/mL, 6,001/mL]. Four cases commented on atypical lymphocytes with three of them reporting they were present and one reported that they were absent. HHV6 reactivation was tested for in five cases, and elevated in only one case (1:320, Tamagawa).23 Registry of Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions (regiSCAR) scoring methods were included in only four (25%) of reported cases. Thirteen patients (81%) were treated with steroids (intravenous and/or oral). Other agents used for treatment included cyclosporine (n=1)24 and IVIG (n=1).25 All patients experienced complete resolution of the HSR; among five cases reporting time to resolution, there was a median time to resolution of 7 days [IQR 5 days, 60 days]

Table 3.

Clinical data for cases of Drug Rash Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS) syndrome to vancomycin (n=16)

Age
(yrs)
Gender
(m/f)
Infection treated Reaction
timing*
Clinical signs and
symptoms
Laboratory
findings
Treatment Outcome
Young et al.
2014
24 M Corynebacterium
jeikeium septic
arthritis
21d MP rash,
arthralgia,
lymphadenopathy,
fever
AEC: 2,900/L
AST M/ALT
270mg/dL
No nephritis
RegiSCAR
score 7
IV steroids
with a
prednisone
taper
Clinically
improved
with
resolution of
symptoms
Young et al
2014
48 F L5/S1
osteomyelitis
14d MP rash, facial
edema,
odynophagia,
fever, chills
AEC: 2,200/L
AST M/ALT
337mg/dL
No nephritis
RegiSCAR
score 6
IV steroids
with
prolonged
prednisone
taper
Clinically
improved
within 5
days
Young et al.
2014
59 F MRSA wound
infection
21d MP rash, fever
and facial edema
AEC:
10,400/L
AST M/ALT
113mg/dL
No nephritis
RegiSCAR
score 6
Oral and
topical
steroids
Antihistamines
Clinically
improved
Della-Torre
et al. 2013
75 M Culture negative
endocarditis
27d MP rash, fever AEC: 0.6 ×
109
AST 45/ALT
264mg/dL
Cr. (bl M, max
1.31mg/dL)
RegiSCAR
score > 7
IV steroids
Antihistamines
IVIG
Clinically
improved,
labs
normalized
Blumenthal
et al. 2013
65 M β-hemolytic
Streptococcus
group B empyema
12d MP rash AEC: 3460/L
AST
440mg/dL/AL
T 105mg/dL
Cr. (bl 0.5,
max
2.1mg/dL)
Atypical
lymphocytes:
none
IV Steroids Clinical
improvement
within 48h
DRESS
resolved
after 2
months
Blumenthal
et al. 2013
40 M Propionibacterium
and
Peptostreptococcus
prosthetic joint
infection
28d MP rash, fever,
cervical
lymphadenopathy,
splenomegaly,
pitting edema
AEC:3,890/L
AST
178mg/dL/AL
T 122mg/dL
Cr (bl
0.8mg/dL,max
2.2mg/dL)
HHV6 IgG
<1:20
IV steroids,
followed by 6
month oral
taper
Clinical
improvement
within 2
days
Blumenthal
et al. 2013
48 F Coagulase negative
S.aureus prosthetic
joint infection
28d MP rash, fever AEC:1,900/L
AST
85mg/dL/ALT
137mg/dL
No nephritis
HHV6 <1:20
No steroids
used in
management
Antihistamines
Gradual
clinical
improvement
with
supportive
care
Blumenthal
et al. 2013
74 M Gram positive
cocci cellulitis after
traumatic hand
injury
21d MP rash, fever,
facial and
peripheral edema,
hypotension,
tachycardia
AEC: 6,550/L
AST
75mg/dL/ALT
170mg/dL
Cr (bl 1.4
mg/dL,max
2.3mg/dL)
HHV6 <1:20
No steroids
used in
management
IVF
Switched
therapy
Clinically
improved
Blumenthal
et al. 2013
51 M Osteomyelitis 21d MP rash,
periorbital edema,
chest tightness,
nausea, fever,
chills,
lightheadedness
AEC: 1,620/L
AST 107
mg/dL/ALT
347mg/dL
No nephritis
HHV6 DNA
<600
IV steroids
Switched
therapy
Clinically
improved
Dauby et al.
2012
54 F Methicillin-
resistant
Staphylococcus
epidermis catheter
associated
bacteremia (febrile
neutropenia in
setting of
chemotherapy for
breast cancer)
7d MP rash, fever,
chills
AEC: 6,380/L
AST 31mg/dL
/ALT 45
mg/dL
No nephritis
Topical
steroids
Antihistamines
Antipyretic
Switched
therapy
Clinically
improved
O’Meara et
al. 2011
66 M ORIF c/b MRSA 28d MP rash, fever,
facial edema,
lymphadenopathy
AEC: 3,620/L
AST
163mg/dL
/ALT
144mg/dL
Cr (bl
1.3mg/dL,max
4.9mg/dL)
IV steroids Clinically
improved
after
prolonged
treatment
course
Boet et al.
2009
38 F Streptococcus
oralis endocarditis
30d MP rash, fever,
facial edema
AEC: 2820/L
No nephritis
IV steroids Clinically
improved,
discharged
within few
weeks
Vauthey et
al. 2008
60 F MRSA cellulitis
after amputation
18d MP rash, fever,
periorbital edema
AEC: 1,251/L
Cr Cl
30mL/min
IV steroids
Topical
steroids
Antihistamines
Gradually
improved,
discharged
after 2
months
Tamagawa-
Mineoka et
al. 2007
52 M Cholesteatoma s/p
tymanoplasty
(MRSA infection
from ear wound)
4d MP rash, fever,
facial edema
AEC: 1,832/L
AST 358
mg/dL/ALT
547mg/dL
Cr (bl NA,
max 3.58
mg/dL)
HHV6 DNA
1:320
IV steroids
followed by
prednisone
taper
Clinically
resolved
Zuliani et al.
2005
45 F Coagulase negative
endocarditis
18d MP rash, fever,
facial edema
AEC: 1,474/L
AST 385
mg/dL/ALT
599 mg/dL
Cr (bl 0.8
mg/dL,max
5.3 mg/dL)
IV steroids
with
prednisone
taper
Antihistamines
Hemodialysis
Cyclosporine
After two
cutaneous
relapses,
Clinically
improved
Marik et al.
1997
51 M Culture negative
endocarditis
30d MP rash,
palpitations,
malaise, dyspnea
and rigors
AEC: 5,875/L
Cr (bl 1.0
mg/dL, max
7.8 mg/dL)
IV steroids Clinically
improved in
1 week.
Hospital
course c/b
urosepsis
*

Timing from vancomycin dose to reaction onset

Abbreviations: d: days; MP: maculopapular; AEC: absolute neutrophil count; M: missing; RegiSCAR: registry of severe cutaneous adverse reactions; IV: intravenous; MRSA: methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Cr: creatinine; bl: baseline; IVIG: intravenous immunoglobins; DRESS: drug rash eosinophilia with systemic symptoms; HHV6: human herpesvirus 6; IVF: intravenous fluids; ORIF: open reduction internal fixation; c/b: complicated by; Cl: clearance;

Among 8 AIN cases patients had median age of 58 years [IQR 42 years, 68 years]and majority (75%) were male (Table 4). The median treatment time prior to HSRwas 26 days [IQR 7 days, 29 days]. Rash was present in six patients (75%), with more than half of the rashes described as maculopapular. Median peak Creatinine was a 6.6 mg/dL [IQR 3.5 mg/dL, 8.8 mg/dL].. Peripheral blood eosinophilia was quantified in 5 cases with a median peak AEC of 936/mL [IQR 861/mL, 979/mL]. All biopsied cases were proven AIN by kidney biopsy including interstitial edema, with eosinophils, and mononuclear infiltrations. Five patients(63%) received steroid treatment and five patients alsorequired renal replacement therapy. One patient received steroid-sparing agents cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetilafter failing steroid treatment.26 Complete resolution occurred in 6/8 (75%) of the patients, with four cases quantifying the median time to resolution (60 days [IQR 49 days, 165 days]). There were two deaths, both attributed to underlying infections..

Table 4.

Clinical data for cases of acute interstitial nephritis (AIN) to vancomycin (n=8)

Age
(yrs)
Gender
(m/f)
Infection
treated
Reaction
timing*
Symptoms Lab data Biopsy Treatment Outcome
Htike et
al. 2012
79 F Coagulase-neg
Staphylococcus
Bacteremia
7d Malaise,
fatigue
Cr (bl 0.9
mg/dL,max
11.7 mg/dL,
92.3%
change)
No urine
eosinophils
ATN changes:
Loss of
tubular cells
tubular
dilatation
AIN changes:
Interstitial
edema
Eosinophils
Mononuclear
infiltrate
Oral steroids
for 2 weeks
Renal
function
resolved over
4 weeks
Salazar
et al.
2010
51 M MRSA
osteomyelitis
28d Rash Cr (bl 0.9
mg/dL, max
2.2,59.0%
change)
AEC:
2318/L
Interstitial
edema
Eosinophils
Mononuclear
infiltrations
Oral steroids One
recurrence
Followed by
resolution
Michail
et al.
2009
35 M S. aureus
empyema
4d MP rash,
arthralgia
Cr (bl
normal, max
6.5 mg/dL)
No urine
eoisinophils
Mononuclear
inflammatory
infiltration
Furosemide
HD
Switched
therapy
Renal
function
resolved over
10m
Hong et
al. 2007
44 M Polymicrobial
wound
infection with
Staphylococcus
aureus, Group
B Streptococci,
and S.mitis
28d Rash, fever,
hypotensio
n
Cr (bl 3.1
mg/dL, max
8.5 mg/dL,
63.5%
change
AEC: 640/L
Giant cell
granulomas
Mononuclear
interstitial
infiltration
After failed
IV and oral
steroids x
1w, switched
to
cyclosporine
and MMF
HD
Switched therapy
Renal
function
improved
with
cyclosporine,
MMF and
HD for 2m
Hsu et al.
2001
70 M MRSA abscess 23d Fever, MP
rash
Cr (bl 2.0
mg/dL, max
3.5
mg/dL,42.9
% change)
AEC: 936
Interstitial
edema
Eosinophils
Mononuclear
infiltrations
Oral steroids
CVVH
Switched
therapy
Several
readmissions
followed by
death from
polymicrobial
sepsis
Wai et
al. 1998
64 M MRSA sternal
wound
dehiscence s/p
CABG
39d Fever, MP
rash
Cr (bl 1.1
mg/dL,max
9.5
mg/dL,88.4
% change)
AEC: 979/L
Interstitial
mononuclear
infiltrations
Granulomata
Oral steroids
HD
over 2 weeks
Switched
therapy
Renal
function
improved
Several
readmissions
and

complicated
post-
operative
course
Codding
et al.
1989
67 M Staphylococcus
aureus
endocarditis
30d Fever, MP
rash
Cr (bl 1.5
mg/dL, max
6.6mg/dL)
AEC: 861
Interstitial
mononuclear
infiltration
Granulomata
HD
Switched
therapy
Clinically
deteriorated
Deceased
from septic
shock
Bergman
et al.
1988
34 F Endometritis,
Staphylococcus
aureus
6d Fever,
pedal
edema
Cr (bl 1.5
mg/dL,max
3.4 mg/dL)
AEC: normal
Refused renal
biopsy
Discontinued
vancomycin
Renal
function
resolved
within 15
days
*

Timing from vancomycin dose to reaction onset

Abbreviations: d: days; Cr: Creatinine; bl: baseline; max: maximum; ATN: acute tubular nephrosis; AIN: allergic interstitial nephritis; MRSA: methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; AEC: absolute eosinophil count; MP: maculopapular; HD: hemodialysi; IV: intravenous; w: weeks; MMF: mycofenolate mofetil; m: months; CVVH: continuous-veno-venous hemofiltration; s/p: status-post; CABG: coronary artery by-pass graft

Of the six cases of vancomycin-induced SJS or TEN, .patients had a median age of 38 years [IQR 36 years, 46 years]and half were male (Table 5). The median treatment time prior to HSR was 9 days IQR [9 days, 22days]. All cases had biopsies consistent with SJS or TEN (e.g., revealing epidermal necrosis and blisters along the dermal-epidermal junction). Steroids were used for treatment in two cases. Resolution occurred in four (67%) of cases, with time to resolution (reported in three cases), a median of 56 days [IQR 29 days, 57 days].Two patients (33%) died with one death attributed to HSR complications, and the other death being attributed to terminal illness

Table 5.

Clinical data for cases of Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS)/toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) to vancomycin (n=6)

Age
(yrs
)
Sex
(m/f
)
Infection
treated
Reactio
n
timing*
Rash description Lab data Biopsy Treatment Outcome
Changela
et al.
2013
35 M MRSA
abscess
9d Dusky purpuric
plaques and
multiple fluid
filled blisters on
the trunk, upper
and lower
extremities. 30%
of BSA
IgA:
154mg/dL
Necrotic
epidermis
Severe
blisters at
DE junction
Necrotic
keratocytes
IV steroids for
4d
Oral steroid
taper
Clinically
improved
O’Brien
et al.
2011
46 F Respiratory
failure
“few” d Epidermal
sloughing,
erosions and
blisters over 40%
BSA. Nikolsky
sign positive
Epidermal
necrosis,
minimal
interface,
and
perivascular
lymphocytic
infiltrate
Discontinuatio
n of
vancomycin
Terminally
ill, deceased
Bouaziz
et al.
2006
38 F Fistula 9d MP rash, fever,
oral, ocular and
mucous membrane
erosions, diffuse
blisters, Nikolsky
sign positive, 50%
epidermal skin
detachment
Serum drug
level
20mg/L
Follicular
necrosis DE
detachment
IV fluids
Anti-infectious
therapy
Nutritional
support
Skin care
Deceased
day 13, from
HSR
Chan-
Tack
2000
46 F Infected hip
joint
prosthesis
8d Diffuse flaccid
bullae covering
50% BSA,
necrotic epidermis.
Epidermal
necrosis and
detachment
Whirlpool
therapy
Topical
antimicrobial
Nutritional
support
Pain control
Clinically
improved,
discharged
after 8
weeks
Alexande
r et al.
1996
36 M Endocarditi
s
17d MP rash involving
torso, abdomen,
legs and arms.
Lymphadenopathy
, pharyngreal
irritation, lip
swelling, and
conjunctival
irritation.
ANC:
1;911/mm3
Eosinophili
a (13-28%)
Epidermal
necrosis
DE junction
blisters
Dermal
infiltration
Steroid therapy Clinical
improvemen
t within 24h
Vidal et
al. 1992
28 M S. aureus
sepsis
(history of
AIDS)
27d MP rash, fever,
oral mucosa and
genitals involved.
Nikolsky’s sign
positive
ESR:
78mm/hour
ANC:
1,349/mm3
Lymphocyti
c and
neutrophilic
subdermal
infiltration
Switched
therapy
Recovered,
discharged
after 57d
*

Timing from vancomycin dose to reaction onset

Abbreviations: MRSA: methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus; d: days; BSA: body surface area; DE: dermal-epidermal; IV: intravenous; MP: maculopapular; HSR: hypersensitivity reaction; ANC: absolute neutrophil count; AIDS: acquired immunodeficiency syndrome; ESR: erythrocyte sedimentation rate

DISCUSSION

We performed a systematic case review of vancomycin HSRs and found 71 cases representing a variety of HSRs, including IgE-mediated, LABD, DRESS syndrome, AIN, and SJS/TEN. The most frequently observed HSRs from vancomycin were non-immediate (n=64) with LABD the most frequently reported vancomycin HSR (n=34). We were able to appreciate some variability in case diagnosis and treatment that may inform future care of these patients and encourage standard case reporting or rare HSRs. We observed a high frequency of case fatality, which in some cases was directly related to the HSR, indicating a need for increased awareness of vancomycin HSRs.

The most challenging HSR to identify in our review was IgE-mediated vancomycin HSRs because it was difficult to diagnose and distinguish from red man syndrome. There are no serum tests that exist, skin testing is not validated, and vancomycin is known to be a direct mast cell activator.27 The current accepted skin testing protocol for IgE-mediated vancomycin allergy includes using a non-irritating concentration with skin prick concentration 50mg/mL and intradermal concentration 0.01 and 0.1 mcg/mL.28,10 Although only one of our IgE-mediated HSRs to vancomycin cases used skin testing, other included cases had clinical courses that supports possible existence of an IgE mechanism; many had prior vancomycin exposure to account for sensitization and many failed red man syndrome protocols or desensitization. While severe red man syndrome is clinically indistinguishable from IgE-mediated anaphylaxis, IgE-independent reactions can often be overcome with premedication. Additionally, drug hypersensitivity literature previously reported that it is often patients with IgE-mediated reactions who have breakthrough reactions during desensitization procedures.12,13 We believe that this case review highlights the need for allergist involvement when patients fail red man syndrome protocols. Such patients may benefit from vancomycin skin testing and future doses may need to be given by a desensitization procedure.

LABD was the most commonly identified vancomycin HSR, although overall LABD incidenceranges from 0.2 to 2.3 cases per million individuals per year.29,30 Our data was similar to previous data, with patients commonly over 60 years old; however, our cases included eight patients who were 60 years old or younger.29,31 This review highlights why this HSR can be confused with other HSRs, including SJS/TEN, erythema multiforme, maculopapular rash, and others. While only two cases did not present with a typical bullous eruption, cases included other exam features such as target lesions, vesicles, skin desquamation and/or mucous membrane involvement. Our findings reinforce the importance of skin biopsy in the diagnosis of cutaneous HSRs.

DRESS syndrome is a morbid, systemic HSR that includes rashes, hematologic abnormalities, lymphadenopathy, and internal organ involvement, most commonly the liver and/or kidneys. DRESS syndrome is a clinical diagnosis, usually of exclusion, and is ideally diagnosed using the regiSCAR clinical score developed by European investigators in surveillance studies.32,33 However, among the vancomycin DRESS cases synthesized, the majority did not report the regiSCAR score. Beyond its usefulness in the clinical care of patients with potential DRESS syndrome, using objective scoring is the best available method to convey diagnostic clinical certainty when publishing a case report. Finally, although DRESS syndrome has a reported mortality rate from 4-10%,34,35 our described DRESS cases had no fatalities. While there are no experimental trials evaluating the use of corticosteroids for the treatment of DRESS syndrome, our DRESS patients largely received steroids for DRESS syndrome and all experienced clinical recovery.

Because renal toxicity is at the forefront of a clinician’s mind when treating patients with vancomycin who develop an acute change in creatinine,36,37 AIN to vancomycin is likely underdiagnosed. However AIN is the cause of 10-27% of acute kidney injury without a clear cause.38 AIN clinically presents with rash, peripheral eosinophilia, and/or eosinophiliuria. By microscopy, the urine may have white blood cell casts. However, the diagnosis of AIN is made with a kidney biopsy, and because there is rarely a clinical need to perform a biopsy, there are few cases of biopsy-proven acute interstitial nephritis.39 Several risk factors for developing vancomycin-induced AIN have been identified: concurrent treatment with aminoglycosides, elevated vancomycin trough >10mg/L, and prolonged treatment (>21 days).40 We similarly found the median number of days of vancomycin therapy prior to AIN was >21 days (26 days); therefore. it may be useful to consider vancomycin AIN when patients develop a change in creatinine after a prolonged vancomycin course. There is limited prognostic data available for vancomycin-induced AIN. One case series found that patients’ serum creatinine remained elevated in approximately 40% of patients and the mean recovery time of renal function was 1.5 months.41 We found that 75% of the cases had recovery of their renal function, although five (63%) required renal replacement therapy and, overall, recovery generally took a number of months.

Our review has a number of important limitations. The first limitation concerns bias within the studies themselves. Although we established clinical case standards, all cases of HSRs to vancomycin are naturally limited by our clinical diagnostic tools in drug allergy. This is less important for HSRs that were biopsy-proven (e.g., LABD) and more important for HSRs that relied on a clinical diagnosis (e.g., IgE-mediated, DRESS syndrome). The included cases may have suffered from misattribution; many of the patients were on other drugs concurrent with vancomycin and we had to rely on the primary case author’s causality assessment. Another limitation with this type of analysis is that there is bias across studies including publication bias and selective reporting. Although we found the most cases of LABD, we cannot determine that this observed frequency is related to the actual frequency of the HSR. Our findings may be due to clinicians being more inclined to write-up cases with severe or dramatic outcomes, which could also explain the high overall mortality. Nevertheless, HSRs from vancomycin are occurring and can be severe.

In summary, we identified a variety of HSRs to vancomycin that all clinicians using vancomycin should have knowledge of, especially since vancomycin is commonly used in the United States.42 Our review reveals valuable clinical pictures of these HSRs, and highlights the need for improved diagnostic and reporting tools for rare HSRs.

Supplementary Material

01

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors would like to thank Niki Holtzman for her research assistance.

Funding

This work was conducted with the support from Harvard Catalyst | The Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center (National Center for Research Resources and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health Award UL1 TR001102) and financial contributions from Harvard University and its affiliated academic healthcare centers. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of Harvard Catalyst, Harvard University and its affiliated academic healthcare centers, or the National Institutes of Health.

Abbreviations

IgE

Immunnoglobulin E

LABD

Linear IgA Bullous Dermatosis

DRESS

drug rash eosinophilia and systemic symptoms

AIN

acute interstitial nephritis

SJS/TEN

Stevens-Johnson’s syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Conflicts of interest: none

REFERENCES

  • 1.Rubinstein E, Keynan Y. Vancomycin revisited - 60 years later. Front public Heal. 2014 Oct 2;217 doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2014.00217. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2014.00217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rybak M, Lomaestro B, Rotschafer JC, et al. Therapeutic monitoring of vancomycin in adult patients: a consensus review of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, and the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2009;66(1):82–98. doi: 10.2146/ajhp080434. doi:10.2146/ajhp080434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bratzler DW, Dellinger EP, Olsen KM, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2013;70(3):195–283. doi: 10.2146/ajhp120568. doi:10.2146/ajhp120568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bruniera R. The use of vancomycin with its therapeutic and adverse effects : a review. 2015. pp. 694–700. [PubMed]
  • 5.Wynn M, Dalovisio JR, Tice AD, Jiang X. Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy for infections with methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus. South Med J. 2005;98(6):590–595. doi: 10.1097/01.SMJ.0000145300.28736.BB. doi:10.1097/01.SMJ.0000145300.28736.BB. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sivagnanam S, Deleu D. Red man syndrome. 2003:119–121. doi: 10.1186/cc1871. doi:10.1186/cc1871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions : Explanation and Elaboration. 2009;6(7) doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Weiss ME, Bernstein DI, Blessing-moore J, et al. Drug allergy: an updated practice parameter. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2010;105(4):259–273. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2010.08.002. doi:10.1016/j.anai.2010.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.PF W. Vancomycin hypersensitivity. UpToDate. http://www.uptodate.com/contents/vancomycin-hypersensitivity. Published 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Otani Iris M., Kuhlen James, Jr, Blumenthal Kimberly, Autumn Guyer AB. A role for vancomycin epicutaneous skin testing in the evaluation of perioperative anaphylaxis. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2015 doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2015.06.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Campbell RL, Li JTC, Nicklas R a, Sadosty AT. Emergency department diagnosis and treatment of anaphylaxis: a practice parameter. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2014;113(6):599–608. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2014.10.007. doi:10.1016/j.anai.2014.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Solensky R. Drug allergy: an updated practise parameter. Ann Allergy, Asthma Immunol. 2010;105(4):259–273. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2010.08.002. KD. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Jingu A, Fukuda J, Taketomi-Takahashi A. Breakthrough reactions of iodinated and gadolinium contrast media after oral steroid premedication protocol. BMC Med Imaging. 2014;14(34) doi: 10.1186/1471-2342-14-34. TY. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Renz CL, Thurn JD, Finn HA, Lynch JP. Antihistamine prophylaxis permits rapid vancomycin infusion. Crit Care Med. 1999;27(9):1732–1737. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199909000-00006. MJ. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mezzano V, Giavina-Bianchi P, Picard M, Caiado J. Drug desensitization in the management of hypersensitivity reactions to monoclonal antibodies and chemotherapy. BioDrugs. 2014;28(2):133–144. doi: 10.1007/s40259-013-0066-x. CM. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hesterberg PE, Banerji A, Oren E, et al. Risk stratification for desensitization of patients with carboplatin hypersensitivity: clinical presentation and management. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009;123(6):1262–1267.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.02.042. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2009.02.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Castells Guitart MC. Rapid drug desensitization for hypersensitivity reactions to chemotherapy and monoclonal antibodies in the 21st century. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2014;24(2):72–79. quiz 2 p following 79. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24834769. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hassaballa Hesham, Naveed Mallick JO. Vancomycin Anaphylaxis in a Patient with Vancomycin-induced red man syndrome. Am J Ther. 2000;7(319):320. doi: 10.1097/00045391-200007050-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Villavicencio Alan, Hey Lloyd, Dhavalkumar Patel PB. Acute cardiac and pulmonary arrest after infusion of vancomycin with subsequent desensitization. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1998;100(6):853–854. doi: 10.1016/s0091-6749(97)70287-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Chopra N, Oppenheimer J, Derimanov GS, Fine PL. Vancomycin anaphylaxis and successful desensitization in a patient with end stage renal disease on hemodialysis by maintaining steady antibiotic levels. Ann Allergy, Asthma Immunol. 2000;84(6):633–635. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62416-7. doi:10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62416-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Polk RE, Healy DP, Schwartz LB, Rock DT, Garson ML. Vancomycin and the red-man syndrome: pharmacodynamics of histamine release. J Infect Dis. 1988;157(3):502. doi: 10.1093/infdis/157.3.502. RK. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kitazawa T, Ota Y, Kada N, Morisawa Y, Yoshida A. Successful Vancomycin Desensitization with a Combination. 2005:317–321. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.45.1388. February 1998. doi:10.2169/internalmedicine.45.1388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Tamagawa-Mineoka R, Katoh N, Nara T, Nishimura Y, Yamamoto S, Kishimoto S. DRESS syndrome caused by teicoplanin and vancomycin, associated with reactivation of human herpesvirus-6. Int J Dermatol. 2007;46(6):654–655. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2007.03255.x. doi:10.1111/j.1365-4632.2007.03255.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zuliani E, Zwahlen H, Gilliet F, Marone C. Vancomycin-induced hypersensitivity reaction with acute renal failure: resolution following cyclosporine treatment. Clin Nephrol. 2005;64(08):155–158. doi: 10.5414/cnp64155. doi:10.5414/CNP64155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Della-Torre E, Yacoub M-R, Pignatti P, et al. Optimal management of DRESS syndrome in course of infectious endocarditis. Ann Allergy, Asthma Immunol. 2013;110(4):303–305. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2013.01.006. doi:10.1016/j.anai.2013.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hsu SI. Biopsy-Proved Acute Tubulointerstitial Nephritis and. Pharmacology. p. 200AD. Ph D. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 27.Sugimoto Y1, Iba Y, Utsugi K. Influences of everninomicin, vancomycin and teicoplanin on chemical mediator release from rat peritoneal mast cells. Jpn J Pharmacol. 2000;83(4):300–305. doi: 10.1254/jjp.83.300. KC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Polk RE, Israel D, Wang J, Venitz J, Miller J, Stotka J. Vancomycin skin tests and prediction of “red man syndrome” in healthy volunteers. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993;37(10):2139–2143. doi: 10.1128/aac.37.10.2139. doi:10.1128/AAC.37.10.2139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Fortuna G, Marinkovich MP. Linear immunoglobulin A bullous dermatosis. Clin Dermatol. 2012;30(1):38–50. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2011.03.008. doi:10.1016/j.clindermatol.2011.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mintz EM, Morel KD. Clinical features, diagnosis, and pathogenesis of chronic bullous disease of childhood. Dermatol Clin. 2011;29(3):459–462. doi: 10.1016/j.det.2011.03.022. ix. doi:10.1016/j.det.2011.03.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Wojnarowska F, Marsden RA, Bhogal B. Chronic bullous disease of childhood, childhood cicatricial pemphigoid, and linear IgA disease of adults. A comparative study demonstrating clinical and immunopathologic overlap. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1988;19:792–805. doi: 10.1016/s0190-9622(88)70236-4. BM. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Cacoub P, Musette P, Descamps V, et al. The DRESS syndrome: a literature review. Am J Med. 2011;124(7):588–597. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.01.017. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.01.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kardaun SH, Sekula P, Valeyrie-Allanore L, et al. Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS): an original multisystem adverse drug reaction. Results from the prospective RegiSCAR study. Br J Dermatol. 2013;169(5):1071–1080. doi: 10.1111/bjd.12501. doi:10.1111/bjd.12501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Chen Y-C, Chiu H-C, Chu C-Y. Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms: a retrospective study of 60 cases. Arch Dermatol. 2010;146(12):1373–1379. doi: 10.1001/archdermatol.2010.198. doi:10.1001/archdermatol.2010.198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wongkitisophon P, Chanprapaph K, Rattanakaemakorn P, Vachiramon V. Six-year retrospective review of drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms. Acta Derm Venereol. 2012;92(2):200–205. doi: 10.2340/00015555-1222. doi:10.2340/00015555-1222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Van Hal SJ, Paterson DL, Lodise TP. Systematic review and meta-analysis of vancomycin-induced nephrotoxicity associated with dosing schedules that maintain troughs between 15 and 20 milligrams per liter. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57(2):734–744. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01568-12. doi:10.1128/AAC.01568-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Jeffres MN, Isakow W, Doherty J a, Micek ST, Kollef MH. A retrospective analysis of possible renal toxicity associated with vancomycin in patients with health care-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia. Clin Ther. 2007;29(6):1107–1115. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.06.014. doi:10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.06.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Perazella M a. Diagnosing drug-induced AIN in the hospitalized patient: a challenge for the clinician. Clin Nephrol. 2014;81(6):381–388. doi: 10.5414/CN108301. doi:10.5414/CN108301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Htike NL, Santoro J, Gilbert B, Elfenbein IB, Teehan G. Biopsy-proven vancomycin-associated interstitial nephritis and acute tubular necrosis. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2012;16(2):320–324. doi: 10.1007/s10157-011-0559-1. doi:10.1007/s10157-011-0559-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Rybak MJ1, Albrecht LM, Boike SC. Nephrotoxicity of vancomycin, alone and with an aminoglycoside. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1990;25(4):679–687. doi: 10.1093/jac/25.4.679. CP. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Rossert J1. Drug-induced acute interstitial nephritis. Kidney Int. 2001;60:804–817. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2001.060002804.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kirst Herbert A., Thompson Diane G., TIN Historical Yearly Usage of Vancomycin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998;42(5):1303–1304. doi: 10.1128/aac.42.5.1303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

01

RESOURCES