Abstract
Nucleation of branched actin filaments by Arp2/3 complex is tightly regulated to control actin assembly in cells. Arp2/3 complex activation involves conformational changes brought about by ATP, Nucleation Promoting Factor (NPF) proteins, actin filaments and NPF-recruited actin monomers. To understand how these factors promote activation, we must first understand how the complex is held inactive in their absence. Here we demonstrate that the Arp3 C-terminal tail is a structural switch that prevents Arp2/3 complex from adopting an active conformation. The interaction between the tail and a hydrophobic groove in Arp3 blocks movement of Arp2 and Arp3 into an activated filament-like (short pitch) conformation. Our data indicate ATP binding destabilizes this interaction via an allosteric link between the Arp3 nucleotide cleft and the hydrophobic groove, thereby promoting the short-pitch conformation. Our results help explain how Arp2/3 complex is locked in an inactive state without activators and how autoinhibition is relieved.
Arp2/3 complex nucleates branched actin filaments, and is inactive in the absense of activators. Here the authors present a model of Arp2/3 autoinhibition, whereby the Arp3 C-terminal tail acts as a structural switch that blocks movement of Arp2 and Arp3 into an activated filament-like conformation.
Arp2/3 (Actin-related protein 2/3) complex is a seven-subunit protein assembly that plays a key role in regulating the actin cytoskeleton. By nucleating branched actin filaments in response to cellular signals, it controls the assembly of dendritic actin networks required for a broad range of cellular processes, including endocytosis, protrusion of invadopodia and lamellipodia, and positioning of the meiotic spindles1,2,3. In the absence of activating factors, Arp2/3 complex is held in an inactive or low activity state. Activation typically requires interactions with several activating factors, including preformed actin filaments, actin monomers, ATP and a class of proteins called nucleation promoting factors (NPFs)4,5,6,7,8,9,10. The nucleation activity of Arp2/3 complex must be tightly regulated by these factors for cells to properly control the dynamics and architectures of actin networks11,12,13. Despite the importance of ensuring that the complex does not nucleate filaments in the absence of activators, the molecular basis by which the complex is held in an autoinhibited state is not understood.
Several high-resolution structures of autoinhibited/inactive Arp2/3 complex are available14,15,16,17. In this conformation, the two actin-related subunits in the complex, Arp2 and Arp3, align roughly end-to-end in a conformation referred to as ‘splayed' (Fig. 1). Activation is thought to require a substantial structural change in which Arp2 moves ∼25 Å into position side-by-side with Arp3, creating an Arp2–Arp3 ‘short pitch' heterodimer that mimics two consecutive actin monomers within a filament. The short-pitch conformation is hypothesized to provide the nucleus to template a new filament14. While this hypothesis has never been directly tested, several lines of evidence indicate that activating factors stimulate movement of Arp2 and Arp3 into the short-pitch conformation, suggesting this conformational change may be a key activation step7,18,19,20,21,22. Therefore, controlling the conformational switch from the splayed to the short-pitch state could be a critical aspect of Arp2/3 complex regulation. However, despite the availability of high-resolution structures of the inactive complex and several mutational studies, the structural features of the complex that stabilize the splayed/autoinhibited state in the absence of activators have yet to be clearly identified. Activating mutations on four Arp2/3 complex subunits (Arp2, Arp3, ARPC2 and ARPC4) have been identified either in screens or in targeted mutational analysis, but the mechanism by which these mutations influence the conformation of the complex is unknown7,13,20,23,24,25,26. Identification and structural dissection of autoinhibitory features would not only reveal how nucleation is prevented in the absence of activating factors, but would provide a framework for understanding how activators stimulate nucleation.
Multiple inputs (NPFs, actin monomers, actin filaments and ATP) are required for activation of the complex. Mounting evidence indicates that each of these inputs plays an important role in regulating the dynamics and architectures of Arp2/3-nucleated actin networks in vivo4,10,27,28,29. For instance, NPFs such as the WASP family proteins link Arp2/3 complex to cellular signalling pathways, while the requirement for preformed filaments ensures that the complex creates exclusively branched actin filaments4,10. Likewise, bound ATP provides a built-in timer that controls branch lifetimes, since hydrolysis of ATP occurs on the complex following nucleation and stimulates debranching28,30,31. Like WASP, ATP binding causes conformational changes in the complex, but how these changes are linked to activation is not known. In X-ray crystal structures, ATP binding causes the nucleotide cleft of Arp3 to close, moving subdomain 4 of Arp3 closer to subdomain 2 (refs 15, 16). ATP binding increases FRET in Arp2/3 complex tagged with fluorescent proteins, providing additional evidence for ATP-induced structural changes21. A precise understanding of these changes and how they are linked to activation is critical, both to determine how the ATP-binding requirement is structurally encoded into the branching nucleation mechanism and to uncover the molecular basis for regulating branched actin network dynamics.
Here we identify interactions at the Arp2–Arp3 splayed interface as key autoinhibitory features of the Arp2/3 complex. We show that destabilizing this interface stimulates population of the short-pitch conformation and activates Arp2/3 complex nucleation activity. We identify the Arp3 C-terminal tail as a switchable molecular element that controls the activity of the complex in vitro and in vivo by controlling the stability of the Arp2–Arp3 splayed interface. Specifically, our data indicate that engagement of the Arp3 C-terminal tail with the Arp3-barbed end groove helps hold the complex in the inactive splayed conformation, while release of the tail destabilizes the splayed interface to stimulate the short-pitch conformation. ATP binding stimulates the short-pitch conformation, likely through an allosteric connection between the nucleotide binding cleft (NBC) and the barbed end groove that triggers release of the Arp3 C terminus. Therefore, this work reveals a molecular mechanism by which ATP contributes to activation and provides a structural framework to understand how activators of Arp2/3 complex can relieve autoinhibition to activate branching nucleation.
Results
The Arp3 C terminus holds the complex in the inactive state
Both Arp2 and Arp3 contain several conserved inserts/extensions relative to actin, suggesting that in addition to mimicking actin during nucleation, the actin-related subunits play additional structural roles in the function of the complex24,32. Consistent with this hypothesis, we recently discovered two insertions within the Arp3 subunit that harbour complex-specific functions, one in controlling interactions with actin filaments and another in stabilizing attachment of a non-actin-related subunit to the complex24. These observations led us to wonder if other insertions/extensions could be involved in the response of the complex to its regulators. Our analysis led to one promising candidate, a conserved extension in Arp3 termed the C-terminal tail, which wedges into a cleft between subdomains 1 and 3 called the barbed end groove (Fig. 2a). The surface of the barbed end groove is largely hydrophobic, and two conserved non-polar residues within the Arp3 C terminus pin it into the groove in some structures (Fig. 2b)14,16. Molecular dynamics simulations suggested the engagement of the C-terminal tail with the barbed end groove could allosterically influence the conformation of the Arp3 nucleotide-binding cleft (NBC)33, so we reasoned that the tail could be important for controlling the conformation and activity of the complex. To test this, we created a budding yeast strain expressing an arp3 mutant (arp3ΔC) lacking 10 residues from its C terminus as its sole copy of Arp3. We purified Arp3ΔC complex from budding yeast and tested its activity in a pyrene actin polymerization assay (Fig. 2c,d, Supplementary Fig. 1). The C-terminal truncation potently increased the NPF-independent activity of Arp2/3 complex. In reactions containing 50 nM Arp2/3 complex the maximum polymerization rate increased ∼20-fold on deletion of the Arp3 C terminus. These data demonstrate that the Arp3 C terminus plays a critical role in keeping the complex inactive in the absence of activators. To determine whether the autoinhibitory function of the Arp3 C terminus is conserved, we truncated the homologous residues from the C terminus of Schizosaccharomyces pombe Arp3. As observed with budding yeast Arp3, deletion of the C terminus of S. pombe Arp3 increased the NPF-independent activity of the complex (Fig. 2e,f). In the absence of nucleation promoting factors, 200 nM S. pombe Arp3ΔC increased the maximum polymerization rate almost two-fold over actin alone in a pyrene actin polymerization assay. Under the same conditions, wild-type Arp2/3 complex showed only a ∼16% increase in the maximum polymerization rate over reactions with actin alone. These data demonstrate that the C terminus of Arp3 has a conserved role in autoinhibiting Arp2/3 complex.
The Arp3 C terminus influences endocytic actin assembly
We next asked whether deletion of the C terminus has functional consequences in vivo. Specifically, we tested whether deletion of the Arp3 C-terminal tail influences S. pombe actin patches, cortical actin networks required for plasma membrane invagination during endocytosis7,23,34,35,36,37. To monitor actin patch dynamics, we used green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged Fim1, an actin crosslinking protein that binds actin filaments in the patches and shows the same accumulation and disassembly kinetics as actin38,39. Actin patches in the arp3ΔC strain were similar in quantity and overall appearance to wild-type patches (Fig. 3a,b). In wild-type cells, the Fim1-GFP signal typically accumulated at the cortex and then moved inward as it disappeared, consistent with previous studies40,41. Importantly, actin patches in the arp3ΔC strain frequently failed to internalize, with only 51 % of actin patches (n=114) moving off of the cortex compared with 76 % of the patches tracked in wild-type cells (n=113, Fig. 3c). Actin patches in the arp3ΔC strain also had longer lifetimes than wild-type patches (Fig. 3d, Supplementary Movie 1 and 2). To determine whether the increased lifetimes were caused by decreased patch assembly or disassembly rates, we measured Fim1-GFP intensity throughout the patch lifetime in both wild type and arp3ΔC mutant cells. Both assembly and disassembly were slowed, and the total intensity of Fim1-GFP was less in the mutant (Fig. 3e). This result was unexpected, since increases in Arp2/3 complex activity might be expected to accelerate actin patch assembly (see discussion). We next asked if the actin defects influenced endocytosis by pulsing cells with the lipophilic dye FM4-64. In wild-type cells, the dye was immediately internalized from the plasma membrane, and stained endosomes and other internal membranes even at the first imaging time point, similar to previous reports24 (Fig. 3f). In contrast, uptake was delayed in the arp3ΔC strain, with strong FM4-64 staining of the plasma membrane 5 min after the initial pulse. By comparison, the delay was more pronounced in a wsp1Δ strain42, where strong staining was visible at the plasma membrane up to 20 min after the pulse. The observed defects in both actin patch dynamics and endocytosis indicate that the C-terminal tail of Arp3 is required to properly regulate Arp2/3 complex in vivo.
Arp3 C terminus blocks formation of the short-pitch dimer
Our data show that the Arp3 C-terminal tail plays a critical role in keeping the complex inactive in the absence of activators. We analysed the available X-ray crystal structures to determine how the tail could influence activity. The N-terminal portion of the tail, which we refer to as the ‘base' of the tail, wraps around the bottom of subdomain 1, fills the back end of the barbed end groove and directly contacts subdomain 4 of Arp2 at the splayed interface14,15,16. The C-terminal end of the tail, which we will refer to as the ‘tip', wedges into the front portion of the barbed end groove and is pinned into position by L445 and F446 (Fig. 4a). In some X-ray crystal structures, the tip engages the groove while in others, it is disengaged and disordered14,15,16. Because the base of the Arp3 C-terminal tail occupies a critical position at the Arp2–Arp3 splayed interface and the tip adopts multiple conformational states, we hypothesized that the Arp3 C terminus could be a switchable structural element that enables activating factors to influence the stability of the Arp2–Arp3 splayed interface.
To test this, we first asked whether the Arp3 C-terminal tail is required to hold the complex in the splayed conformation. We used a previously described crosslinking assay in which engineered cysteines on Arp2 and Arp3 can be crosslinked by the 8 Å crosslinker bismaleimidoethane (BMOE) only when the complex is in the short-pitch conformation22 (Fig. 4b). The Arp3 C-terminal deletion is not predicted to significantly influence either the solvent accessibility or the pKa of the engineered cysteine residues, ensuring that changes in short-pitch crosslinking efficiency are due to the conformational change and not the chemical reactivity of the thiol groups (Supplementary Table 1). Deletion of the Arp3 C-terminal tail in the context of the dual cysteine S. cerevisiae Arp2/3 complex potently stimulated crosslinking between the engineered cysteines (Fig. 4c,d). A 30-s reaction with 25 μM BMOE, 200 μM ATP and no NPF yielded 31±6 % crosslinking with the Arp3ΔC complex, while a negligible amount of the wild-type complex was crosslinked under the same conditions. These data indicate that the Arp3 C-terminal tail autoinhibits the complex by blocking it from adopting the short-pitch conformation. We note that analysis with the program X-walk showed that the minimal crosslinking length required to bond the engineered cysteines when the complex is in the short-pitch conformation (Cβ to Cβ) is between 8.0 and 11.3 Å, very close to the maximum expected crosslinking distance of BMOE (∼8 Å from sulfur to sulfur)43. Therefore, the crosslinked complex is held in or very near the short-pitch conformation. For simplicity, we refer to the crosslinked complex as being in the short-pitch conformation in the sections that follow, though it is important to note that we cannot currently eliminate the possibility that Arp2 and Arp3 could deviate somewhat from a perfect filament-like arrangement and still form the engineered crosslink.
Destabilizing the splayed interface activates Arp2/3 complex
The base of the Arp3 C-terminal tail directly contacts Arp2 at the splayed interface, suggesting the tail prevents adoption of the short-pitch conformation by stabilizing the splayed conformation (Fig. 4a). However, some residues in the Arp3 C-terminal tail are near the Arp2–Arp3 short-pitch interface in the electron tomography model of a branch junction44 (Supplementary Fig. 2), so it is also possible that the C-terminal truncation influences the conformation of the complex by stabilizing short-pitch contacts between Arp2 and Arp3. To investigate these possibilities, we first sought more conservative mutations to test whether destabilization of the splayed Arp2–Arp3 interface is sufficient to stimulate the short-pitch conformation. We initially considered R441 and N442 in the base of the Arp3 C-terminal tail. These residues contribute to the splayed Arp2–Arp3 interface, but are also close to the predicted short-pitch interface (Fig. 4a, Supplementary Fig. 2). In contrast, the αE/αF loop in subdomain 4 of Arp2 contributes several residues to the Arp2–Arp3 splayed interface. None of these residues are predicted to contribute to the short-pitch interface (Fig. 5a,b, Supplementary Fig. 3)44. Therefore, we constructed budding yeast strains expressing Arp2 αE/αF loop mutants as their sole copy of Arp2, then purified and characterized the mutant complexes (Fig. 5c). At Arp2 position 207 we changed the wild-type alanine to bulkier amino acids to disrupt contacts of the αE/αF loop with Arp3. In addition, we mutated Arp2 F203 to Tyr. F203Y is one of two mutated residues found in an Arp2 mutant isolated in a genetic screen, arp2-7, that confers increased NPF-independent activity to the complex13,23,45,46. Because of its position in the Arp2 αE/αF loop, we reasoned that the F203Y mutation could also destabilize the Arp2–Arp3 splayed interface. To determine whether these mutations influence the conformation of the complex, we used the short-pitch crosslinking assay. We found that three of the splayed interface mutations increased formation of short-pitch crosslinks (Fig. 5d,e, Supplementary Table 2). In 1-min reactions, the Arp2-A207W, A207C and F203Y mutants increased crosslinking 5-, 6- and 12-fold compared with the wild-type complex, respectively. These results demonstrate that the Arp2–Arp3 splayed interface helps hold the complex in the inactive conformation. Furthermore, they show that destabilizing the splayed interface potently stimulates the short-pitch conformation. We note that the Arp2(A207I) mutant complex was prone to degradation, but when isolated showed similar behaviour in the crosslinking assay as wild-type complex, indicating not all mutations of residue 207 can stimulate the short-pitch conformation.
To determine whether the splayed interface mutations increased the NPF-independent activity of the complex, we tested the mutants in pyrene actin polymerization assays. The Arp2(A207C), Arp2(A207W) and Arp2(F203Y) mutant complexes each showed increased NPF-independent nucleation activity compared with wild-type Arp2/3 complex, consistent with their increased propensity to adopt the short-pitch conformation (Fig. 5f,g). The A207C and F203Y mutations showed the most potent activation, and at 100 nM increased the maximum polymerization rate 3.6- and 2.6-fold over the wild-type complex, respectively. The A207W mutant showed a more modest 1.8-fold increase in activity compared with the wild-type complex, and the A207I mutant was nearly identical to wild type. Altogether, our data demonstrate that destabilization of the splayed interface not only potently stimulates formation of the short-pitch conformation, but also increases the NPF-independent nucleation activity of the complex. These data support a model in which the C terminus prevents spurious activation of the complex by locking it into the splayed conformation.
ATP binding stimulates the short-pitch conformation
The requirement for the Arp3 C-terminal tail in regulation of Arp2/3 complex in vitro and in vivo, together with evidence for structural plasticity of this feature, suggests factors that activate Arp2/3 complex could target the tail to decrease the stability of the splayed Arp2–Arp3 interface. Structural information addressing the influence of WASP family proteins on the complex is limited to low resolution EM reconstructions7,19,20, small angle X-ray scattering models18, FRET19,47, crosslinking48,49,50,51,52, photo-activatable label transfer-based constraints53, and X-ray crystal structures showing electron densities that likely represent partial segments of bound WASP. In these structures, electron density at the interface of subdomain 3 and 4 in Arp3 is consistent with three residues of the A region of N-WASP54,55. Further, tubes of electron density at the barbed ends of Arp2 and Arp3 in these structures could correspond to the predicted alpha helical segment in C54,55. The lack of complete high-resolution structures for the bound activators makes it unclear how binding of WASP could switch Arp2/3 complex from the splayed to the short-pitch state. ATP is also required for activation, and in contrast to other activators, several high-resolution structures of the complex in apo- versus ATP-bound states are available14,15,16. While these structures show that ATP binding closes the NBC of Arp3, Arp2 and Arp3 remain in a splayed conformation, so it is unclear how ATP could contribute to activation. However, in these structures, NBC closure is correlated with widening of the barbed end groove and release of the tip of the Arp3 C terminus33 (Fig. 6a). These observations led us to propose a model in which ATP helps activate the complex by stimulating closure of the Arp3 nucleotide cleft, causing release of the autoinhibitory C terminus from the barbed end groove and subsequent destabilization the splayed Arp2–Arp3 interface (Fig. 6a). As a first test of this model, we asked if binding of ATP to the complex stimulates population of the short-pitch conformation. The crosslinking assays in Figs 4 and 5 of this study were run in buffers containing ATP to match conditions of polymerization assays, so we ran a set of experiments to directly compare short-pitch crosslinking with and without ATP. These data demonstrate that ATP stimulates the short-pitch conformation in the wild-type complex. Even after five minutes of crosslinking, we did not detect any crosslinking in the absence of ATP, whereas 19±2 % of the complex crosslinked in the presence of ATP (Fig. 6b,c). ATP binds to both Arp2 and Arp3, so binding to either Arp could be responsible for stimulating the splayed to short-pitch conformational change6,30. Therefore, we tested the ability of ATP to increase short-pitch crosslinking using a previously described mutant complex defective in ATP binding to Arp3, Arp3(G358Y)7. Consistent with our model, the Arp3 NBC mutant Arp3(G358Y) reduced the ability of the ATP to stimulate short-pitch crosslinking, demonstrating that ATP binding to Arp3 is important for stimulating the short-pitch dimer (Fig. 6d). To probe for a role for ATP binding to Arp2, we generated two mutations in the Arp2 NBC, D10A and G302Y. Both of these mutations decrease crosslinking of ATP to the Arp2 subunit and potently decrease Arp2/3 complex activity (Supplementary Fig. 4)7. Unexpectedly, both mutations completely blocked ATP-induced stimulation of short-pitch conformation. Altogether, these data demonstrate that ATP binding to both Arp3 and Arp2 is important for stimulation of the short-pitch conformation, but that ATP engagement at the Arp2 NBC plays a larger role.
To further investigate the link between nucleotide binding and the stability of the Arp2–Arp3 splayed interface, we tested how activating mutations in the C terminus or in the Arp2 αE/αF loop influenced the ability of ATP to stimulate the short-pitch conformation. While the wild-type complex showed no short-pitch crosslinkling in the absence of ATP, two of the mutants, including Arp2(A207C) and Arp2(F203Y), showed significant crosslinking in the absence of ATP (Fig. 6d). Importantly, ATP-bound mutant complexes showed 8–15-fold more potent crosslinking than ATP-bound wild-type complex (Fig. 6e, Supplementary Table 3). These data indicate that the intrinsic stability of the splayed interface tunes the ability of ATP to shift the conformation toward the short-pitch state. We note that the relatively weak ATP-induced stimulation of short-pitch crosslinking in the wild-type complex is consistent with the weak NPF-independent activity of the wild-type S. cerevisiae complex in pyrene actin polymerization assays (Fig. 2c)20,56.
Release of C terminus stimulates short-pitch conformation
Our data show that ATP binding to Arp3 stimulates adoption of the short-pitch dimer, even though the nucleotide-binding site is ∼20 Å from the Arp2–Arp3 splayed interface. Therefore, we wondered if structural changes initiated at the Arp3 NBC could allosterically destabilize the splayed Arp2–Arp3 interface. As mentioned above, crystal structures with ATP bound show the Arp3 cleft in a closed conformation, a state correlated with widening of the barbed end groove and disordering of the tip of the Arp3 C terminus16,33,57 (Fig. 6a). In contrast, crystal structures of the complex with no nucleotide bound to Arp3 tend to show an open NBC, a closed barbed end groove, and the Arp3 C terminus engaged14,16. These structural comparisons, along with molecular dynamics simulations, indicate that the NBC, the barbed end groove, and the Arp3 C terminus are allosterically linked33. The structural link between these regions is consistent with our measurements of etheno-ATP (ɛ-ATP) binding to the S. pombe complex, which specifically measures nucleotide binding to the Arp3 subunit (see Methods section). Specifically, we found that ɛ-ATP bound ∼2.7-fold more tightly to the Arp3ΔC mutant than the wild-type SpArp2/3 complex (Supplementary Fig. 5). Unexpectedly, the binding affinity of ɛ-ATP for the S. cerevisiae complex did not change when the Arp3 C terminus was deleted (Supplementary Fig. 5). This was surprising given that ATP binding and truncation of the Arp3 C terminus stimulate the same conformational change in ScArp2/3 complex (Fig. 4). While we cannot currently explain this result, one possibility is that ɛ-ATP engages the NBC differently than ATP so fails to form the same allosteric link to the Arp3 C terminus.
The allosteric link between the NBC, the barbed end groove, and the Arp3 C terminus suggests that ATP binding could influence the stability of the splayed interface by controlling the engagement of the Arp3 C terminus with the barbed end groove. However, in the x-ray crystal structures, nucleotide-induced NBC closure generally results in disorder of the tip of the Arp3 C-terminal tail, while the base of the tail remains fully or partially ordered (Fig. 7a, Supplementary Fig. 6). The Arp3 C-terminal truncations we describe above remove both the tip and base of the tail (Fig. 2b). Removal of base of the tail could directly destabilize the splayed conformation because it eliminates residues that participate in the splayed Arp3–Arp2 interface (Fig. 4a). Therefore, we wondered if disruption of the tip alone could allosterically destabilize the splayed interface. To test this, we mutated to aspartate the two conserved hydrophobic residues that pin the tip into the barbed end groove (Fig. 7b). Like the complete C-terminal deletion, this mutation, Arp3(L445D/F446D), increased NPF-independent activity compared with the wild-type complex (Fig. 7c,d). In addition, the Arp3(L445D/F446D) mutation stimulated formation of the short-pitch conformation in the crosslinking assay, despite the fact that neither of the mutated residues directly contribute to the splayed interface (Figs 4a and 7e). Similar to the C-terminal deletion mutant, the Arp3(L445D/F446D) mutant required ATP for potent stimulation of the short-pitch conformation (Fig. 7e). Furthermore, like the Arp3 C-terminal truncation, the Arp3(L445D/F446D) mutant formed a secondary (non-short pitch) Arp3–Arp2 crosslinked band in the BMOE crosslinking assay (Fig. 7f). This secondary product forms due to a crosslink between an endogenous cysteine in Arp3, C426 and Arp2. C426 is at the barbed end of Arp3 adjacent to the C-terminal tail, and is reactive when the C-terminal tail is deleted, but not in the wild-type complex (Fig. 7b,d, Supplementary Fig.7). That the C426 non-short-pitch crosslink occurs in the Arp3(L445D/F446D) mutant suggests that mutation of the tip of the tail increases the solvent exposure of Arp3 C426 similarly to the C-terminal truncation, providing additional evidence that the Arp3(L445D/F446D) mutation releases the tail from the barbed end groove. Together, these data support a model in which release of the tip of the Arp3 C terminus from the barbed end groove allosterically influences the conversion from the splayed to short-pitch conformation, providing a molecular mechanism by which ATP helps relieve autoinhibition of Arp2/3 complex.
Discussion
Our data indicate that Arp2/3 complex must be locked in the splayed conformation to prevent its spurious activation. Interactions that stabilize the splayed conformation can be described by two major sets of contacts14,15,16. First, Arp2 and Arp3 are held by a molecular clamp formed by ARPC1, ARPC2, ARPC4 and ARPC5 (Supplementary Fig. 8). The clamp buries ∼1,500 Å2 of surface area of Arp2 and 2,100 Å2 of Arp3. Second, Arp2 and Arp3 interact end-to-end in the splayed conformation within the clamp (Supplementary Fig. 8). The contact area of the splayed Arp2–Arp3 interface is relatively small (∼800 Å2), and based on analysis with the program PISA is not a relevant dimer interface in the absence of the clamp58. However, we show that the Arp2–Arp3 splayed interface is critical for controlling the conformation of the complex. Furthermore, our data suggest that at least one activator, ATP, targets the splayed interface to activate the complex. In addition to Arp2/3 complex activators, we note that at least one inhibitor also targets the splayed Arp2–Arp3 interface. CK-666, a small molecule Arp2/3 complex inhibitor, binds in a pocket at the splayed interface, directly stabilizing the splayed arrangement to inactivate the complex22. Therefore, tuning the strength of the splayed Arp2–Arp3 interface may be a general mechanism by which regulators control branching nucleation by Arp2/3 complex.
Here we present a ‘tail release' model in which the Arp3 C-terminal tail serves as a molecular switch that controls the conformation and activity of the complex. In this model, when the tip of the tail is released from the barbed end groove, it destabilizes interactions between the base of the tail and Arp2, thereby stimulating the short-pitch conformation (Fig. 6a). Existing biochemical and structural data support the tail release model, but several lines of evidence indicate that activation involves additional structural mechanisms. For instance, ATP binding increased short-pitch crosslinking in the Arp3ΔC mutant, demonstrating that deletion of the Arp3 C-terminal tail is not sufficient to completely populate the short-pitch state (Fig. 6e). In addition, while ATP binding to Arp3 contributed to stimulation of the short-pitch conformation, our data showed that ATP binding to Arp2 is actually more important, so nucleotide binding must also stimulate the short-pitch conformation through mechanisms not directly involving the Arp3 C terminus. We note that several other mutations in Arp2/3 complex are known to increase the NPF-independent nucleation activity of the complex. While the structural basis by which these mutations relieve autoinhibition is unknown, the location of the amino-acid changes suggests they may not be directly linked to the tail release mechanism20,25. Understanding how multiple structural features in the complex coordinately stimulate activation, and how Arp2/3 complex regulators target these features remain important open questions. We anticipate that the short-pitch crosslinking assay will provide an important tool in this regard.
ATP hydrolysis by Arp2/3 complex stimulates branch disassembly, so the requirement for ATP in activation creates a built-in timing mechanism to control turnover of branched actin networks28,29,30. Mutational analysis shows that ATP binding to both Arp2 and Arp3 is important for branching nucleation7,21, but how nucleotide binding to either Arp subunit could influence the activity of the complex was unknown. Here we show that ATP stimulates formation of the short-pitch conformation, explaining how it contributes to activation. By mutating the NBC of Arp3, we showed that ATP binding to Arp3 is important for stimulation of the short-pitch conformation, consistent with the tail release model. Previously published FRET experiments are consistent with our data, since mutations in the Arp3 NBC blocked an ATP-induced increase in FRET21. However, these data also showed that NBC mutations in Arp2 did not block the conformational change measured by FRET21, whereas the same mutations completely blocked short-pitch crosslinking in our assays here, making it unclear if the FRET assay measures the short-pitch conformational change. That ATP binding to Arp2 stimulates the short-pitch conformation is also supported by a previously described NBC mutation in Arp2, Y309A. Arp2-Y309A increases the activity of the complex both in the presence and absence of NPF7. In EM reconstructions of negatively stained particles, the Y309A complex favors a conformation more closely resembling the wild-type NPF-bound than free complex7. This suggests that it may stimulate the short-pitch conformation, and that like Arp3, the nucleotide cleft of Arp2 is allosterically linked to overall positions of Arp3 and Arp2 in the complex. Dissection of the structural basis for this allosteric link will be important for understanding how Arp2/3 complex is activated. We note that at cellular concentrations, ATP will bind rapidly to the nucleotide-free Arp subunits, so the apo-complex is likely more transient that the ADP-bound states. Therefore, determining precisely why ADP cannot activate Arp2/3 complex will also be important for understanding the nucleotide-controlled timing mechanism for branch dissociation.
Mutations that selectively uncouple the activity of Arp2/3 complex from each of its activating inputs (ATP, actin monomers, actin filaments and NPFs) will be critical to understand how Arp2/3 complex integrates activating signals to control branching nucleation in vivo4,5,6,7,8,9,10. While substantial work remains to identify new mutants and characterize existing ones, important trends have already emerged. First, despite potent in vitro NPF-independent activation by some mutations, the phenotype of existing activating mutations is relatively mild. For instance, deletion of the Arp3 β4/β5 insert increased activation of S. pombe Arp2/3 complex by WASP (Wsp1), but had no influence on endocytic actin patches24. Similarly, the budding yeast Arp2(Y309A) mutant showed no obvious defects in endocytic actin patch localization or organization7. The arp2-7 budding yeast strain, which harbours the Arp2(F203Y) mutation we characterize here (plus one additional mutation in Arp2), showed defects in patch dynamics13,23,45,46, but like the arp3ΔC strain, the patches remained cortical and resembled wild-type actin patches. The failure of existing activating mutations to cause accumulation of ectopic actin structures suggests additional mechanisms regulate the activity of the mutant complexes in vivo. One possibility is that these mutations fail to uncouple the activity of the complex from the requirement to bind preformed filaments. Consistent with this hypothesis, several experiments suggest the in vivo activity of wild-type Arp2/3 complex is limited by the availability of suitable preformed substrate filaments9,42,59. Negative regulators of the complex or its activators (for example, Crn1, Syp1, Bbc1, Sla1, Lsb1) may also dampen the in vivo influence of the mutations, explaining the mild phenotypes13,50,60,61. A second emerging trend is that while relatively mild, the phenotypes of each of the activating mutations are distinct. These differences cannot be explained by the relative in vitro potency of the mutations. For instance, the S. pombe Arp3ΔC mutation shows modest activity in vitro but has the most pronounced influence on actin dynamics in vivo. We speculate that the precise molecular mechanism by which these mutations uncouple activation from activating inputs influences their in vivo effect on actin dynamics. We note that the arp3ΔC mutant is particularly intriguing in that its influence on the dynamics of the actin patches (increased Fim1 lifetime and defective internalization) is similar to what has been observed for mutations that compromise the activity of the complex rather than activate it7,13. We anticipate that further dissection of this and other key Arp2/3 complex mutants will provide important insight into the in vivo function of the complex.
Methods
Construction of fission yeast strains
A fission yeast strain harbouring the arp3ΔC(416-427) mutation was made by transforming the TP150 strain with a cassette harbouring a premature stop codon and the KanMX6 marker62. FIM1 was tagged with GFP by homologous recombination strategy using a cassette generated from pFA6a-GFP-NatMX6 (ref. 63). Both integrations were confirmed by amplifying and sequencing the entire regions. See Supplementary Table 4 for all fission yeast strains used in this study.
Construction of budding yeast strains
Splayed interface mutations in Arp2 were constructed by Quick Change PCR using as a template a previously constructed vector in which arp2(R198C) was subcloned into pRS317 with native promotor and terminator sequences22. Arp3(L445D/F446D), Arp3ΔC440-449 and Arp3ΔC440-449(C426A) expression plasmids were created by the same method, using a previously described template in which arp3(L155C) is flanked by native promoter and terminator sequences was cloned into pRS315. These plasmids were introduced into haploid strains with the corresponding Arp subunit knocked out and rescued on a URA plasmid. Haploid strains expressing Arp subunits off of the pRS plasmids were then mated, sporulated and selected through random spore analysis to generate the final yeast expression strains22. See Supplementary Table 5 and 6 for all budding yeast plasmids and strains used in this study.
Protein purification and labelling
Pyrene-labelled rabbit skeletal muscle actin was purified by extracting actin monomers with G-buffer (2 mM Tris pH 8.0, 0.2 mM ATP, 0.5 mM DTT, 0.1 mM CaCl2, 1 mM NaN3) and polymerized by adding 50 mM KCl and 2 mM MgCl2. After 1 h, [KCl] was increased to 800 mM to promote dissociation of actin-binding proteins and then pelleted for 2 h at 32 K rpm in a F37L rotor (Thermo scientific). The actin pellet was resuspended in G-buffer and dialysed for ∼3 days against G-buffer, changing the buffer multiple times before gel filtering on a 300-ml Sephacryl S300-HR column. To label the actin with pyrene, a portion of the unlabelled actin was repolymerized in labelling buffer (25 mM Tris pH 7.5, 100 mM KCl, 2 mM MgSO4, 0.3 mM ATP, 3 mM NaN3) and labelled overnight with a 7:1 molar excess of N-(1-Pyrene)Iodoacetamide (10 mM stock in DMF). The pyrene-labelled actin was pelleted, and the resuspended actin pellet was dialysed and gel filtered similar to the unlabelled actin. For expression of S. pombe Arp2/3 complex, S. pombe cells were grown in 200 ml of YES medium at 30 °C. After ∼24 h, 10 ml of this culture was used to inoculate 1 l cultures of YES, which were grown at 30 °C for 12–16 h. An additional 35 g of YES was added to each 1-l culture, and cells were grown to an optical density at 600 nm of ∼6.0 before harvesting. To produce S. cerevisiae cell pellets for protein purification, a starter culture grown in synthetic media lacking Leu, Lys, His and Trp was added to 1-l YPD medium and allowed to grow to OD600 ∼7–8. An additional 50 g L−1 YPD powder was added and cells were harvested at OD600 ∼15–16. Before collecting, 2 mM EDTA and 0.5 mM PMSF was added to prevent proteolysis. Cells were pelleted in a F8B rotor at 5K rpm for 5 min. Cells were resuspended in lysis buffer (20 mM Tris pH 8.0, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT), and stored at −80 degrees Celsius. S. pombe Arp2/3 complex was purified using an ammonium sulfate cut, a GST-N-WASP-VCA affinity column, a MonoQ anion ion exchange column (GE Healthcare), and a Superdex 200 gel filtration (GE Healthcare). S. cerevisiae Arp2/3 complexes were purified using an ammonium sulfate cut, a GST-N-WASP-VCA affinity column and a gel filtration step. Unlike the other complexes reported here, the Arp3ΔC mutant complexes could not be eluted from a GST-N-WASP-VCA affinity column using high salt. These complexes were instead eluted with 50 mM reduced glutathione solution. The pooled fractions were then purified by monoQ and glutathione sepharose columns to remove any contaminating GST-N-WASP-VCA. Like the wild-type complexes, the Arp3ΔC complexes were gel filtered as a final purification step before flash freezing in liquid nitrogen. Anti-GST (Genescript A00865) western blots were used to demonstrate that there was no detectable GST-N-WASP-VCA in the complexes prepared with the modified purification method (Supplementary Fig. 9).
Actin polymerization assays and kinetic data analysis
Pyrene actin polymerization assays were carried out by adding 1 μl of 100 × antifoam (100X: 0.005% Antifoam-204, Sigma) and 2 μl of 10X ME buffer (10X: 5 mM MgCl2, 20 mM EGTA) to 20 μl of a 5X actin stock and incubated for 2 min. Polymerization was initiated by adding 77 μl of KMEI (final concentration: 10 mM Imidazole pH 7.0, 50 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA, 200 μM ATP, 1 mM DTT) with and without Arp2/3 complex where indicated. Fluorescence changes were monitored by exciting the sample at 365 nm and measuring the emission at 407 nm using a Tecan Safire 2 plate reader. The maximum rate of polymer formation was calculated using the equation:
Where the concentration of polymer is equal to the equilibrium concentration (total actin minus 0.1 μM).
Microscopy
Confocal microscopy of S. pombe cells was carried out at 30 °C using a Yokagawa CSU10 spinning-disc head. Cells were maintained in the exponential phase for 2 days before immobilization on a gelatin pad. Images were collected using Micomanager software and actin patches were tracked manually in Image J64,65. For patch internalization measurements, patches were tracked from multiple cells in 3 different movies, using custom Matlab particle tracking scripts66. Patches that moved 2 pixels (∼0.2 μm) from their origin were classified as internalized, even if the patch movement was not perpendicular to the cell cortex. To quantify the intensity of patches over time, a circle with a diameter of seven pixels was drawn in ImageJ over isolated patches and the intensity was measured for each frame. The background was subtracted by measuring the intensity of a circle of the same size in the cytoplasm of the cells. Due to the frequent patch internalization failures in the Arp3ΔC strain, patches were aligned to the maximal intensity of Fim1-GFP, which typically reflects the time at which patch movement starts to occur40,67. FM4-64 uptake assays were carried out by growing cells in YE5S to midexponential phase and incubating at room temperature with 20 μM FM4-64 for one minute. Cells were washed with fresh medium before placing on a gelatin pad and imaging.
ɛ-ATP-binding assays
ɛ-ATP binding was measured by titration of a solution of 0.5 μM wild type or mutant fission yeast Arp2/3 complex in 10 mM Hepes pH 7.0, 50 mM KCl, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM DTT, 1.4 % acrylamide with ɛ-ATP and measuring the fluorescence at 420 nm (excitation=340 nm). The background fluorescence of unbound ɛ-ATP was subtracted by assuming a linear relationship between the signal and ɛ-ATP at saturating concentrations. Data were fit to the following equation:
Where IB and IF are the intensity values of fully bound and free ɛ-ATP, respectively. We note that while both actin-related subunits in the complex bind nucleotide, previous experiments showed that mutations in the Arp2-binding pocket that potently decreased crosslinking of ATP to Arp2 had no influence on the nucleotide affinity measured by this assay, indicating ɛ-ATP measures binding specifically to the Arp3 subunit7.
Short-pitch crosslinking assays
All crosslinking assays were performed with budding yeast Arp2/3 complex containing the arp2(R198C) and arp3(L155C) mutations. Reaction mixes containing Arp2/3 complex with or without additional components (for example, ATP or NPF) in KMEI were mixed with 4 μl of 125 μM BMOE for indicated times at 21 °C before adding SDS–PAGE loading buffer (1xSDS-PAGE buffer: 0.3 % SDS, 33 mM DTT, bromophenol blue) to stop the reaction. Reactions mixes were analysed by SDS–PAGE and western blotting with goat anti-Arp3 (Santa Cruz, sc-11973, 1:1,000 dilution), goat anti-Arp2 (Santa Cruz, sc-11969, 1:1,000 dilution) or mouse anti-Arp3 (Santa Cruz, sc-376625, 1:1,000 dilution) antibodies. Blots were imaged using a LICOR Odyssey Fc system.
Structural modeling
Models used for surface area and pKa calculations were constructed by first creating homology models of ScArp2 and ScArp3 with SWISS-Model (http://swissmodel.expasy.org) using 4JD2 as a template. Arp2 was then moved into the short-pitch conformation using the Oda, et. al. filament model68. Specifically, Arp3 was superposed onto an actin subunit and Arp2 was then overlaid onto the subunit in the short-pitch position relative to Arp3. The geometry of the structure was minimized using Phenix before running the calculations69.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
Additional information
How to cite this article: Rodnick-Smith, M. et al. Identification of an ATP-controlled allosteric switch that controls actin filament nucleation by Arp2/3 complex. Nat. Commun. 7:12226 doi: 10.1038/ncomms12226 (2016).
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank Tom Stevens (University of Oregon), Rong Li (Stowers Institute) and Vladimir Sirotkin (SUNY Upstate Medical University) for sharing plasmids and yeast strains. We thank Ken Prehoda and members of the Nolen Lab for comments on the manuscript and Daniela Olivas, Dar Yoon and Mike Montgomery for assistance creating budding yeast strains. This work was supported by a National Institutes of Health Grant RO1-GM092917 (to B.J.N) and the Pew Biomedical Scholar Program (to B.J.N).
Footnotes
Author contributions B.J.N. and M.R.-S. designed the experiments and interpreted the data. B.J.N., M.R.-S. and C.J.B wrote the manuscript. B.J.N., M.R.-S., S.-L.L., C.J.B and Q.L. generated reagents and carried out experiments.
References
- Goley E. D. & Welch M. D. The ARP2/3 complex: an actin nucleator comes of age. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 7, 713–726 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rotty J. D., Wu C. & Bear J. E. New insights into the regulation and cellular functions of the ARP2/3 complex. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 14, 7–12 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yi K. et al. Dynamic maintenance of asymmetric meiotic spindle position through Arp2/3-complex-driven cytoplasmic streaming in mouse oocytes. Nat. Cell Biol. 13, 1252–1258 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Achard V. et al. A ‘primer'-based mechanism underlies branched actin filament network formation and motility. Curr. Biol. 20, 423–428 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marchand J. B., Kaiser D. A., Pollard T. D. & Higgs H. N. Interaction of WASP/Scar proteins with actin and vertebrate Arp2/3 complex. Nat. Cell Biol. 3, 76–82 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dayel M. J., Holleran E. A. & Mullins R. D. Arp2/3 complex requires hydrolyzable ATP for nucleation of new actin filaments. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 14871–14876 (2001). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Martin A. C. et al. Effects of Arp2 and Arp3 nucleotide-binding pocket mutations on Arp2/3 complex function. J. Cell Biol. 168, 315–328 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Le Clainche C., Didry D., Carlier M. F. & Pantaloni D. Activation of Arp2/3 complex by Wiskott-Aldrich Syndrome protein is linked to enhanced binding of ATP to Arp2. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 46689–46692 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wagner A. R., Luan Q., Liu S.-L. & Nolen B. J. WISH/DIP/SPIN90 proteins form a class of Arp2/3 complex activators that function without preformed actin filaments. Curr. Biol. 23, 1990–1998 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Campellone K. G. & Welch M. D. A nucleator arms race: cellular control of actin assembly. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11, 237–251 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moulding D. A. et al. Unregulated actin polymerization by WASp causes defects of mitosis and cytokinesis in X-linked neutropenia. J. Exp. Med. 204, 2213–2224 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Devriendt K. et al. Constitutively activating mutation in WASP causes X-linked severe congenital neutropenia. Nat. Genet. 27, 313–317 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boettner D. R. et al. The F-BAR protein Syp1 negatively regulates WASp-Arp2/3 complex activity during endocytic patch formation. Curr. Biol. 19, 1979–1987 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Robinson R. C. et al. Crystal structure of Arp2/3 complex. Science 294, 1679–1684 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nolen B. J., Littlefield R. S. & Pollard T. D. Crystal structures of actin-related protein 2/3 complex with bound ATP or ADP. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 15627–15632 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nolen B. J. & Pollard T. D. Insights into the influence of nucleotides on actin family proteins from seven structures of Arp2/3 complex. Mol. Cell 26, 449–457 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Luan Q. & Nolen B. J. Structural basis for regulation of Arp2/3 complex by GMF. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20, 1062–1068 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boczkowska M. et al. X-Ray scattering study of activated Arp2/3 complex with bound actin-WCA. Structure 16, 695–704 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xu X. P. et al. Three-dimensional reconstructions of Arp2/3 complex with bound nucleation promoting factors. EMBO J. (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rodal A. A. et al. Conformational changes in the Arp2/3 complex leading to actin nucleation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 12, 26–31 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Goley E. D., Rodenbusch S. E., Martin A. C. & Welch M. D. Critical conformational changes in the Arp2/3 complex are induced by nucleotide and nucleation promoting factor. Mol. Cell 16, 269–279 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hetrick B., Han M. S., Helgeson L. A. & Nolen B. J. Small molecules CK-666 and CK-869 inhibit actin-related protein 2/3 complex by blocking an activating conformational change. Chem. Biol. 20, 701–712 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moreau V., Madania A., Martin R. P. & Winson B. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae actin-related protein Arp2 is involved in the actin cytoskeleton. J. Cell Biol. 134, 117–132 (1996). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu S. L., May J. R., Helgeson L. A. & Nolen B. J. Insertions within the actin core of actin-related protein 3 (Arp3) modulate branching nucleation by Arp2/3 complex. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 487–497 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Daugherty K. M. & Goode B. L. Functional surfaces on the p35/ARPC2 subunit of Arp2/3 complex required for cell growth, actin nucleation, and endocytosis. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 16950–16959 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Narayanan A., LeClaire L. L. 3rd, Barber D. L. & Jacobson M. P. Phosphorylation of the Arp2 subunit relieves auto-inhibitory interactions for Arp2/3 complex activation. PLoS Comput. Biol. 7, e1002226 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Suarez C. et al. Profilin regulates F-actin network homeostasis by favoring formin over Arp2/3 complex. Dev. Cell 32, 43–53 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Martin A. C., Welch M. D. & Drubin D. G. Arp2/3 ATP hydrolysis-catalysed branch dissociation is critical for endocytic force generation. Nat. Cell Biol. 8, 826–833 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ingerman E., Hsiao J. Y. & Mullins R. D. Arp2/3 complex ATP hydrolysis promotes lamellipodial actin network disassembly but is dispensable for assembly. J. Cell Biol. 200, 619–633 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Le Clainche C., Pantaloni D. & Carlier M. F. ATP hydrolysis on actin-related protein 2/3 complex causes debranching of dendritic actin arrays. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 6337–6342 (2003). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dayel M. J. & Mullins R. D. Activation of Arp2/3 complex: addition of the first subunit of the new filament by a WASP protein triggers rapid ATP hydrolysis on Arp2. PLoS Biol. 2, E91 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Muller J. et al. Sequence and comparative genomic analysis of actin-related proteins. Mol. Biol. Cell 16, 5736–5748 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dalhaimer P., Pollard T. D. & Nolen B. J. Nucleotide-mediated conformational changes of monomeric actin and Arp3 studied by molecular dynamics simulations. J. Mol. Biol. 376, 166–183 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Winter D., Podtelejnikov A. V., Mann M. & Li R. The complex containing actin-related proteins Arp2 and Arp3 is required for the motility and integrity of yeast actin patches. Curr. Biol. 7, 519–529 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rizvi S. A. et al. Identification and characterization of a small molecule inhibitor of formin-mediated actin assembly. Chem. Biol. 16, 1158–1168 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morrell J. L., Morphew M. & Gould K. L. A mutant of Arp2p causes partial disassembly of the Arp2/3 complex and loss of cortical actin function in fission yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell 10, 4201–4215 (1999). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cabrera R., Suo J., Young E. & Chang E. C. Schizosaccharomyces pombe Arc3 is a conserved subunit of the Arp2/3 complex required for polarity, actin organization, and endocytosis. Yeast 28, 495–503 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sirotkin V., Beltzner C. C., Marchand J. B. & Pollard T. D. Interactions of WASp, myosin-I, and verprolin with Arp2/3 complex during actin patch assembly in fission yeast. J. Cell Biol. 170, 637–648 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kaksonen M., Toret C. P. & Drubin D. G. A modular design for the clathrin- and actin-mediated endocytosis machinery. Cell 123, 305–320 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sirotkin V., Berro J., Macmillan K., Zhao L. & Pollard T. D. Quantitative analysis of the mechanism of endocytic actin patch assembly and disassembly in fission yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell 21, 2894–2904 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kaksonen M., Sun Y. & Drubin D. G. A pathway for association of receptors, adaptors, and actin during endocytic internalization. Cell 115, 475–487 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Basu R. & Chang F. Characterization of dip1p reveals a switch in Arp2/3-dependent actin assembly for fission yeast endocytosis. Curr. Biol. 21, 905–916 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kahraman A., Malmstrom L. & Aebersold R. Xwalk: computing and visualizing distances in cross-linking experiments. Bioinformatics 27, 2163–2164 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rouiller I. et al. The structural basis of actin filament branching by the Arp2/3 complex. J. Cell Biol. 180, 887–895 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Madania A. et al. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae homologue of human Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein Las17p interacts with the Arp2/3 complex. Mol. Biol. Cell 10, 3521–3538 (1999). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- D'Agostino J. L. & Goode B. L. Dissection of Arp2/3 complex actin nucleation mechanism and distinct roles for its nucleation-promoting factors in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 171, 35–47 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boczkowska M., Rebowski G., Kast D. J. & Dominguez R. Structural analysis of the transitional state of Arp2/3 complex activation by two actin-bound WCAs. Nat. Commun. 5, 3308 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kreishman-Deitrick M. et al. NMR analyses of the activation of the Arp2/3 complex by neuronal Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein. Biochemistry 44, 15247–15256 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kelly A. E., Kranitz H., Dotsch V. & Mullins R. D. Actin binding to the central domain of WASP/Scar proteins plays a critical role in the activation of the Arp2/3 complex. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 10589–10597 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu S. L., Needham K. M., May J. R. & Nolen B. J. Mechanism of a concentration-dependent switch between activation and inhibition of Arp2/3 complex by coronin. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 17039–17046 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weaver A. M. et al. Interaction of cortactin and N-WASp with Arp2/3 complex. Curr. Biol. 12, 1270–1278 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zalevsky J., Grigorova I. & Mullins R. D. Activation of the Arp2/3 complex by the Listeria acta protein. Acta binds two actin monomers and three subunits of the Arp2/3 complex. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 3468–3475 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Padrick S. B., Doolittle L. K., Brautigam C. A., King D. S. & Rosen M. K. Arp2/3 complex is bound and activated by two WASP proteins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, E472–E479 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ti S. C., Jurgenson C. T., Nolen B. J. & Pollard T. D. Structural and biochemical characterization of two binding sites for nucleation-promoting factor WASp-VCA on Arp2/3 complex. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, E463–E471 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jurgenson C. T. & Pollard T. D. Crystals of the Arp2/3 complex in two new space groups with structural information about actin-related protein 2 and potential WASP binding sites. Acta Crystallogr. F. Struct. Biol. Commun. 71, 1161–1168 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wen K. K. & Rubenstein P. A. Acceleration of yeast actin polymerization by yeast Arp2/3 complex does not require an Arp2/3-activating protein. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 24168–24174 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nolen B. J. & Pollard T. D. Structure and biochemical properties of fission yeast ARP2/3 complex lacking the ARP2 subunit. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 26490–26498 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Krissinel E. & Henrick K. Inference of macromolecular assemblies from crystalline state. J. Mol. Biol. 372, 774–797 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen Q. & Pollard T. D. Actin filament severing by cofilin dismantles actin patches and produces mother filaments for new patches. Curr. Biol. 23, 1154–1162 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rodal A. A., Manning A. L., Goode B. L. & Drubin D. G. Negative regulation of yeast WASp by two SH3 domain-containing proteins. Curr. Biol. 13, 1000–1008 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Humphries C. L. et al. Direct regulation of Arp2/3 complex activity and function by the actin binding protein coronin. J. Cell Biol. 159, 993–1004 (2002). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bahler J. et al. Heterologous modules for efficient and versatile PCR-based gene targeting in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Yeast 14, 943–951 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sato M., Dhut S. & Toda T. New drug-resistant cassettes for gene disruption and epitope tagging in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Yeast 22, 583–591 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schneider C. A., Rasband W. S. & Eliceiri K. W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 671–675 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Edelstein A., Amodaj N., Hoover K., Vale R. & Stuurman N. Computer control of microscopes using microManager. Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol. Chapter 14, Unit14–Unit20 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Helgeson L. A. & Nolen B. J. Mechanism of synergistic activation of Arp2/3 complex by cortactin and N-WASP. eLife 2, e00884 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Berro J. & Pollard T. D. Local and global analysis of endocytic patch dynamics in fission yeast using a new ‘temporal superresolution' realignment method. Mol. Biol. Cell 25, 3501–3514 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Oda T., Iwasa M., Aihara T., Maeda Y. & Narita A. The nature of the globular- to fibrous-actin transition. Nature 457, 441–445 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Afonine P. V. et al. Towards automated crystallographic structure refinement with phenix.refine. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 68, 352–367 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.