Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Pathology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Pathology
. 1994 Jun;47(6):481–492. doi: 10.1136/jcp.47.6.481

Borderline nuclear changes in cervical smears: guidelines on their recognition and management. National Coordinating Network (National Cervical Screening Programme), British Society for clinical Cytology, and Royal College of Pathologists' Working Party.

PMCID: PMC494721  PMID: 8063926

Full text

PDF
481

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Evans D. M., Hudson E. A., Brown C. L., Boddington M. M., Hughes H. E., Mackenzie E. F., Marshall T. Terminology in gynaecological cytopathology: report of the Working Party of the British Society for Clinical Cytology. J Clin Pathol. 1986 Sep;39(9):933–944. doi: 10.1136/jcp.39.9.933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hirschowitz L., Raffle A. E., Mackenzie E. F., Hughes A. O. Long term follow up of women with borderline cervical smear test results: effects of age and viral infection on progression to high grade dyskaryosis. BMJ. 1992 May 9;304(6836):1209–1212. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6836.1209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ismail S. M. Cone biopsy causes cervical endometriosis and tubo-endometrioid metaplasia. Histopathology. 1991 Feb;18(2):107–114. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.1991.tb01452.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Parham D. M., Wiredu E. K., Hussein K. A. Significance of borderline nuclear abnormality in cervical smears. Cytopathology. 1992;3(2):85–91. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.1992.tb00030.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Reiter R. C. Management of initial atypical cervical cytology: a randomized, prospective study. Obstet Gynecol. 1986 Aug;68(2):237–240. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Pathology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES